June 2022 Educational Film // Spin-off, IBM and Kyndryl
The evolution towards the cloud of an iconic IT giant via a de-affiliated subsidiary.
Kyndryl was created through the spin-off of IBM’s infrastructure services business, which was the core of IBM Global Technology Services. By the end of 2020, this business served a portfolio of nearly 4,400 customers, including 75 percent of the top 100 Fortune 100 companies.
On November 4, 2021, Kyndryl completed its separation from IBM and began trading as an independent company on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “KD.”
Professor Jacquet looks at the evolution of this scenario, which seems likely to benefit IBM investors more than Kyndryl stockholders.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:07.400 --> 00:00:10.100
Hello and welcome to this film which is devoted to
2
00:00:10.100 --> 00:00:14.800
an extremely important subject spin-off spin-off
3
00:00:13.800 --> 00:00:16.900
is very relevant today
4
00:00:16.900 --> 00:00:19.500
in Karen business situation. It's
5
00:00:19.500 --> 00:00:21.500
considered by a number of companies.
6
00:00:22.400 --> 00:00:26.300
Now I'm going to use the case of Kindle spun
7
00:00:25.300 --> 00:00:29.200
off from IBM quite recently
8
00:00:28.200 --> 00:00:32.200
in October 2020 IBM announced
9
00:00:31.200 --> 00:00:34.800
at the company's going to list. It's it
10
00:00:34.800 --> 00:00:37.600
infrastructure Services Unit, which
11
00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:40.400
is going to be named Kindred. It's represents
12
00:00:40.400 --> 00:00:43.600
something like 20 billion dollars of revenues out
13
00:00:43.600 --> 00:00:46.700
of the total of 80 billion for IBM as
14
00:00:46.700 --> 00:00:49.700
a whole. Well, it's 25% of the revenues
15
00:00:49.700 --> 00:00:52.600
but it is also half of the capital
16
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:55.500
expenditures. So you understand that this activity
17
00:00:55.500 --> 00:00:58.300
is slightly more Capital intensive at
18
00:00:58.300 --> 00:01:01.100
the rest of IBM and it is
19
00:01:01.100 --> 00:01:03.700
less profitable in a commercial point of view.
20
00:01:04.500 --> 00:01:07.300
If you look at the return on sales e b d
21
00:01:07.300 --> 00:01:11.500
a overseas over revenues. It's about 11 12% for
22
00:01:11.500 --> 00:01:13.000
the it infrastructure business.
23
00:01:13.900 --> 00:01:16.700
Prospectus provided by a Kindle and
24
00:01:16.700 --> 00:01:19.400
10K report now today kendril is
25
00:01:19.400 --> 00:01:22.800
out of IBM and what's remains hybrid cloud
26
00:01:22.800 --> 00:01:26.000
computing Consulting software. The big
27
00:01:25.100 --> 00:01:28.100
deal of sales is 26%
28
00:01:29.200 --> 00:01:32.000
So you understand that the assets turnover is higher for
29
00:01:32.600 --> 00:01:35.200
IBM, excluding Kindle and the return on service
30
00:01:35.200 --> 00:01:38.300
is higher. So definitely they want to get rid of
31
00:01:38.300 --> 00:01:41.700
this non-strategic asset. It's announced
32
00:01:41.700 --> 00:01:44.500
in October 2020. It's going to be completed in October
33
00:01:44.500 --> 00:01:47.200
2021 now kendril is
34
00:01:47.200 --> 00:01:50.500
listed ticker KD on New
35
00:01:50.500 --> 00:01:53.400
York Stock Exchange before we get back to the case. I
36
00:01:53.400 --> 00:01:56.300
would like that we spend some time discussing the motivations of
37
00:01:56.300 --> 00:01:59.500
companies when they decide to spin off and the
38
00:01:59.500 --> 00:02:02.500
various methods which are used by this
39
00:02:02.500 --> 00:02:02.700
companies.
40
00:02:03.500 --> 00:02:06.600
What about motivations first? It's about
41
00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:10.400
getting rid of non-core non-strategy
42
00:02:09.400 --> 00:02:12.600
asset it comes from where it
43
00:02:12.600 --> 00:02:15.600
comes from the fact that in the 70s and 80s,
44
00:02:15.600 --> 00:02:18.800
they were conglomerates with core and non-core
45
00:02:18.800 --> 00:02:21.800
assets Diversified conglomerates terrible
46
00:02:21.800 --> 00:02:24.800
reputations. And by the way, this is why the
47
00:02:24.800 --> 00:02:27.600
market for corporate control emerge in
48
00:02:27.600 --> 00:02:30.300
1980s as a consequence of
49
00:02:30.300 --> 00:02:33.900
freeing the market from any constraint. That's
50
00:02:33.900 --> 00:02:36.900
another story. Now, what does it mean non-core
51
00:02:36.900 --> 00:02:39.300
for a telecommunication operator you remember
52
00:02:39.300 --> 00:02:42.800
we discuss that in a video quite recently the
53
00:02:42.800 --> 00:02:45.600
towers why because Towers about
54
00:02:45.600 --> 00:02:48.400
relay State a piece of land a
55
00:02:48.400 --> 00:02:51.200
mask and so on not very strategic on a technology
56
00:02:51.200 --> 00:02:54.600
called point of view What is strategy is the location? This is
57
00:02:54.600 --> 00:02:57.200
why as a company I get rid of
58
00:02:57.200 --> 00:03:00.500
the towers, but I negotiate a long term contract or
59
00:03:00.500 --> 00:03:03.200
agreement with American Tower or sell next
60
00:03:03.700 --> 00:03:06.300
32 years four times eight years
61
00:03:06.300 --> 00:03:10.100
long-term location is again strategic.
62
00:03:12.100 --> 00:03:15.700
Beforehand. I was keeping at home my
63
00:03:15.700 --> 00:03:18.600
mass my Towers. But today I observed
64
00:03:18.600 --> 00:03:21.400
as they are seemingly over evaluated. What
65
00:03:21.400 --> 00:03:24.500
do I do? This? Non-strategy asset is
66
00:03:24.500 --> 00:03:27.400
really nonstrategy because I can sell
67
00:03:27.400 --> 00:03:30.400
it now at the price which is more than it's
68
00:03:30.400 --> 00:03:33.600
quotes fundamental value out of
69
00:03:33.600 --> 00:03:34.100
the picture.
70
00:03:34.900 --> 00:03:37.300
Sometimes it's very easy, you know
71
00:03:37.300 --> 00:03:40.300
the food company Denon Denon is
72
00:03:40.300 --> 00:03:43.600
in dairy product mineral water baby care baby food.
73
00:03:43.600 --> 00:03:46.500
And then on Once Upon a Time was in a champagne business
74
00:03:46.500 --> 00:03:49.600
for any reason champagne is luxury good
75
00:03:49.600 --> 00:03:52.700
baby food, baby care and mineral watery consumable
76
00:03:52.700 --> 00:03:55.700
Goods. There's no reason why you should keep the champagne
77
00:03:55.700 --> 00:03:58.700
business and it was sold in order to find on
78
00:03:58.700 --> 00:04:01.300
some Acquisitions in a consumer good business
79
00:04:01.300 --> 00:04:04.900
and of the motivation, which is quite interesting to analyze
80
00:04:04.900 --> 00:04:07.700
on a strategic point of view. Sometimes the
81
00:04:07.700 --> 00:04:10.300
mother company can be a constraint for the
82
00:04:10.300 --> 00:04:13.700
business development of the activity. It's exactly
83
00:04:13.700 --> 00:04:17.300
the case of the car industry decades ago.
84
00:04:17.300 --> 00:04:20.900
Gm4. They were very much integrated and
85
00:04:20.900 --> 00:04:24.300
they were producing Parts components modules.
86
00:04:23.300 --> 00:04:26.300
So you understand that if
87
00:04:26.300 --> 00:04:30.100
you are producing the mold, you are the part for GM. It's
88
00:04:29.100 --> 00:04:32.100
a bit difficult to sell the same
89
00:04:32.100 --> 00:04:34.300
stuff to four or to be NW.
90
00:04:35.300 --> 00:04:39.100
Now this town was spun off from Ford. Delphi
91
00:04:38.100 --> 00:04:41.700
was spun off from General Motors for
92
00:04:41.700 --> 00:04:44.700
Asia was a controlling into S4 pairs
93
00:04:44.700 --> 00:04:47.200
app agency train now stellantis after the
94
00:04:47.200 --> 00:04:50.800
merger with FCA now for Asia is
95
00:04:50.800 --> 00:04:53.100
absolutely independent from PSA and
96
00:04:53.100 --> 00:04:56.600
from stantis. Now the spinoff is very important for
97
00:04:56.600 --> 00:05:00.100
the product development of the company. When
98
00:04:59.100 --> 00:05:02.500
you are a parts supplier a
99
00:05:02.500 --> 00:05:05.200
new contribute to the development of a car. What do
100
00:05:05.200 --> 00:05:08.800
you know plenty of information confidential about what
101
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:11.900
the product in the end will look like in two
102
00:05:11.900 --> 00:05:13.100
three four years time.
103
00:05:13.800 --> 00:05:16.300
And of course this information should not be
104
00:05:16.300 --> 00:05:19.900
shared. Now imagine that you are the auto part division
105
00:05:19.900 --> 00:05:22.400
of Ford imagine that
106
00:05:22.400 --> 00:05:25.700
GM wants to ask you to develop a part
107
00:05:25.700 --> 00:05:28.600
for a new product which is going to be launched into
108
00:05:28.600 --> 00:05:31.000
three years time. Then you have access to
109
00:05:31.700 --> 00:05:33.600
confidential information for GM.
110
00:05:34.300 --> 00:05:37.200
And you are a subsidiary and you are a division
111
00:05:37.200 --> 00:05:41.400
working for four. There's a little bit potential conflict
112
00:05:40.400 --> 00:05:43.300
of interest. So you want to get
113
00:05:43.300 --> 00:05:46.500
out of that now Vista Airlines completely quote in
114
00:05:46.500 --> 00:05:49.600
their pattern from four and then it can serve
115
00:05:49.600 --> 00:05:52.800
food and GM and any car manufacturer
116
00:05:52.800 --> 00:05:53.700
on the planet.
117
00:05:54.500 --> 00:05:58.100
So you understand that being out of allows
118
00:05:57.100 --> 00:06:00.500
you to get for further development.
119
00:06:01.900 --> 00:06:04.500
Sometimes the objective is to show the real
120
00:06:04.500 --> 00:06:08.000
value of an asset which is absolutely not visible in
121
00:06:07.500 --> 00:06:10.300
the balance sheet and in the business operations of
122
00:06:10.300 --> 00:06:13.600
the company, so you want to show the real value you
123
00:06:13.600 --> 00:06:16.100
make this pin off. Sometimes you want to
124
00:06:16.100 --> 00:06:19.300
give agility keep that in mind because I'm
125
00:06:19.300 --> 00:06:21.400
going to discuss that in a couple of minutes.
126
00:06:22.500 --> 00:06:25.700
But sometimes a motivations are not that
127
00:06:25.700 --> 00:06:28.700
prestigious I would say you remember
128
00:06:28.700 --> 00:06:31.500
the case of Coca-Cola on the bottling activity
129
00:06:31.500 --> 00:06:34.500
Why Did Coca Cola God
130
00:06:34.500 --> 00:06:37.800
read of the bottling activity to improve the financial ratios
131
00:06:37.800 --> 00:06:40.600
first of them economic profit to
132
00:06:40.600 --> 00:06:43.600
avoid being taken over and increase the
133
00:06:43.600 --> 00:06:46.300
stock price. So you want to improve the
134
00:06:46.300 --> 00:06:50.000
ratios. It's not about industry. It's about ratio.
135
00:06:50.700 --> 00:06:53.400
Also, sometimes the companies want
136
00:06:53.400 --> 00:06:56.400
to transfer a little bit of debt when there is
137
00:06:56.400 --> 00:06:59.600
too much debt in a company use pin-off and you
138
00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:02.000
load this spernoff company with a little bit of
139
00:07:02.100 --> 00:07:05.600
debt which reduces your own inadaptedness. Of course,
140
00:07:05.600 --> 00:07:08.400
it is not regarded as a main objective, but
141
00:07:08.400 --> 00:07:11.600
it's quite important in the process as well. Now, let's
142
00:07:11.600 --> 00:07:13.700
go back a minute on agility.
143
00:07:14.400 --> 00:07:17.400
Imagine that you are in charge of an activity
144
00:07:17.400 --> 00:07:20.700
of a business unit inside a big group. Your
145
00:07:20.700 --> 00:07:23.400
business is quite specific. It's quite different from
146
00:07:23.400 --> 00:07:26.700
the rest of the company and you have the feeling that you
147
00:07:26.700 --> 00:07:29.400
are not very much understood by the
148
00:07:29.400 --> 00:07:32.400
sea level the top guys and these
149
00:07:32.400 --> 00:07:35.300
guys you have to discuss plenty of other issues. You
150
00:07:35.300 --> 00:07:39.500
are quite small and they don't have enough time to devote to
151
00:07:39.500 --> 00:07:42.600
your activity. So you are a little bit left alone.
152
00:07:42.600 --> 00:07:45.900
You understand the rationality of spinning
153
00:07:45.900 --> 00:07:48.500
off. If you are out of the pictures and
154
00:07:48.500 --> 00:07:51.800
your sea level is going to take care of your business
155
00:07:51.800 --> 00:07:54.300
activity and that's much more
156
00:07:54.300 --> 00:07:57.300
important. You will have the possibility to attract new
157
00:07:57.300 --> 00:08:00.800
customers generate economies of you gain in agility
158
00:08:00.800 --> 00:08:03.200
in strategy and operating agility.
159
00:08:04.100 --> 00:08:08.000
And it is very true for activities with very different
160
00:08:07.600 --> 00:08:10.400
business economics. And as a
161
00:08:10.400 --> 00:08:13.700
consequence very different Financial metrics imagine for
162
00:08:13.700 --> 00:08:16.400
example, your Capital intensive business
163
00:08:16.400 --> 00:08:19.600
in a large group, which is very light in terms
164
00:08:19.600 --> 00:08:20.900
of capex consumption.
165
00:08:21.700 --> 00:08:24.500
If you are capital intensive what's very important is a
166
00:08:24.500 --> 00:08:28.000
return on Capital. It's to attract long term
167
00:08:27.600 --> 00:08:30.600
customers long-term contracts Rick your
168
00:08:30.600 --> 00:08:33.200
own and more revenues, but for the group, you know, the
169
00:08:33.200 --> 00:08:37.100
Rosa is much less important because Capital employees negligible
170
00:08:36.100 --> 00:08:40.300
and what is important is a churn right?
171
00:08:40.300 --> 00:08:43.300
So you understand that you don't speak the same language. You don't
172
00:08:43.300 --> 00:08:46.700
have the same Financial metrics then it's good idea to spin
173
00:08:46.700 --> 00:08:46.700
off.
174
00:08:47.800 --> 00:08:50.600
Different methods you can simply sell the
175
00:08:50.600 --> 00:08:53.600
business to private Equity to another company
176
00:08:53.600 --> 00:08:56.100
in industrial activity itself.
177
00:08:56.800 --> 00:08:59.800
When the acquiring company is overloaded with
178
00:08:59.800 --> 00:09:03.100
that it becomes a leverage buyout sometimes
179
00:09:02.100 --> 00:09:06.400
management leverage management buyout
180
00:09:05.400 --> 00:09:08.700
and as a alternative is a
181
00:09:08.700 --> 00:09:11.500
split up imagine that in a group. There are
182
00:09:11.500 --> 00:09:14.100
three different activities a b and c
183
00:09:14.100 --> 00:09:17.200
there is no Synergy between these activities or
184
00:09:17.200 --> 00:09:20.000
quite minimum synergies. What do you
185
00:09:20.100 --> 00:09:23.800
do you split up and you create three different entities.
186
00:09:23.800 --> 00:09:26.800
There are not owned by any holding
187
00:09:26.800 --> 00:09:29.700
any more and they have their own separate life.
188
00:09:29.700 --> 00:09:32.600
You remember the IPO Volvo from
189
00:09:32.600 --> 00:09:35.700
GLE. It's about listing the business unit
190
00:09:35.700 --> 00:09:39.000
as neighbor carve out as fast
191
00:09:38.500 --> 00:09:41.200
technology is concerned imagine that in your
192
00:09:41.200 --> 00:09:44.600
are in the labs. You have develop the specific technology, which
193
00:09:44.600 --> 00:09:47.300
you can protect with the pattern intellectual property
194
00:09:47.300 --> 00:09:50.300
and so on and so forth, but this technology is
195
00:09:50.300 --> 00:09:53.500
not part of your technology called strategy is not part
196
00:09:53.500 --> 00:09:56.500
of your business strategy. What do you do you put
197
00:09:56.800 --> 00:09:59.200
The team and the patterns in a separate
198
00:09:59.200 --> 00:10:03.500
entity and these guys start running the business buys himself.
199
00:10:03.500 --> 00:10:06.700
It happens very often when companies have
200
00:10:06.700 --> 00:10:09.100
a strategy of corporate venturing.
201
00:10:09.700 --> 00:10:13.200
It's been out and the last ones about spin-off
202
00:10:12.200 --> 00:10:15.600
which simply means that you are going to distribute the
203
00:10:15.600 --> 00:10:18.700
shares for example to the existing shareholders, which
204
00:10:18.700 --> 00:10:20.400
is a case of IBM.
205
00:10:21.300 --> 00:10:25.500
The IBM shareholders received one kindral
206
00:10:24.500 --> 00:10:27.600
share for each and every
207
00:10:27.600 --> 00:10:30.300
five IBM shares. So you have
208
00:10:30.300 --> 00:10:33.700
five IDM shares and as a dividend tax
209
00:10:33.700 --> 00:10:36.900
impact, you're going to receive one kind
210
00:10:36.900 --> 00:10:39.200
real share. Of course the value of
211
00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:42.600
your portfolio is not changed by one penny, but
212
00:10:42.600 --> 00:10:45.200
what is very important is that now? It's split
213
00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:48.600
into IBM standing alone and Kindle spun off
214
00:10:48.600 --> 00:10:52.000
now, it's impossible to speak about IBM without
215
00:10:51.400 --> 00:10:54.700
looking at the past and a fantastic history
216
00:10:54.700 --> 00:10:57.200
of this iconic firm. The company
217
00:10:57.200 --> 00:11:00.500
is going to be formally created in 1911 and will
218
00:11:00.500 --> 00:11:04.300
become International Business Machines in 1924.
219
00:11:05.300 --> 00:11:08.200
In 1914. The CEO is
220
00:11:08.200 --> 00:11:11.400
Thomas Watson senior. He's going to be the
221
00:11:11.400 --> 00:11:14.400
CEO up to 1956 and he's
222
00:11:14.400 --> 00:11:17.900
going to be replaced by Thomas Watson Jr. That's
223
00:11:17.900 --> 00:11:21.100
fantastic. Isn't it in 1915
224
00:11:20.100 --> 00:11:23.800
the Moto of the companies created
225
00:11:23.800 --> 00:11:26.700
sink and you remember that Steve
226
00:11:26.700 --> 00:11:29.300
Jobs slightly changed the stories
227
00:11:29.300 --> 00:11:31.600
with Apple Computers a few decades there.
228
00:11:32.300 --> 00:11:35.100
In 1934 in the middle
229
00:11:35.100 --> 00:11:38.500
of the crisis when there is a big depression in
230
00:11:38.500 --> 00:11:41.200
the United States people are paid by the
231
00:11:41.200 --> 00:11:44.300
peace and then Watson is going to replace that by
232
00:11:44.300 --> 00:11:48.500
a fixed salary, which is a fantastic social
233
00:11:47.500 --> 00:11:50.900
Improvement for the employees at
234
00:11:50.900 --> 00:11:51.600
IBM.
235
00:11:52.300 --> 00:11:56.700
now in 1952 the first real manframe
236
00:11:55.700 --> 00:11:59.300
computer IBM seven or
237
00:11:58.300 --> 00:11:59.400
one
238
00:12:00.400 --> 00:12:03.200
a few years later and 64. They're very
239
00:12:03.200 --> 00:12:06.600
famous IBM system 360 and
240
00:12:06.600 --> 00:12:09.800
also with word processing starts its
241
00:12:09.800 --> 00:12:13.100
history and the group is transferred into armock New
242
00:12:12.100 --> 00:12:15.800
York the head office now is there
243
00:12:16.400 --> 00:12:19.600
In 1966 the digital random
244
00:12:19.600 --> 00:12:22.500
access memory is no more in
245
00:12:22.500 --> 00:12:25.500
the hands of IBM as you know today but it was created
246
00:12:25.500 --> 00:12:29.200
invented in the labs of the company in 1966
247
00:12:28.200 --> 00:12:32.000
and also invention from the lab but
248
00:12:31.600 --> 00:12:35.000
one under brought a French mathematician
249
00:12:34.900 --> 00:12:39.000
invented the fractal geometry, which
250
00:12:37.100 --> 00:12:40.500
is very much different
251
00:12:40.500 --> 00:12:43.700
from the very famous goals log
252
00:12:43.700 --> 00:12:46.300
normal distribution of returns, which is widely used
253
00:12:46.300 --> 00:12:49.400
by academics in economics and finance. This
254
00:12:49.400 --> 00:12:52.400
is why I'm under broad was not very much accepted by
255
00:12:52.400 --> 00:12:55.300
the academic world, even though what it describes
256
00:12:55.300 --> 00:12:56.900
it's much closer to the reality.
257
00:12:57.900 --> 00:13:01.800
It happens in the academic world. It was 1967
258
00:13:00.800 --> 00:13:04.300
a few years later speech recognition
259
00:13:03.300 --> 00:13:06.800
the invention of the floppy disk
260
00:13:06.800 --> 00:13:10.100
1971 the first IBM PC
261
00:13:09.100 --> 00:13:13.200
as a response to Apple and some others shows
262
00:13:12.200 --> 00:13:15.600
in 1981. It is
263
00:13:15.600 --> 00:13:18.500
developed in the skunk work process in order
264
00:13:18.500 --> 00:13:21.900
to avoid pollution from the main frame developers and
265
00:13:21.900 --> 00:13:24.300
so on so forth now IBM looks
266
00:13:24.300 --> 00:13:27.600
very strong. Robust one century old
267
00:13:27.600 --> 00:13:30.800
company. Well, sometimes it was quite fragile
268
00:13:30.800 --> 00:13:33.500
and when Luke gerstner becomes a
269
00:13:33.500 --> 00:13:36.900
CEO in 1993 is a company is on
270
00:13:36.900 --> 00:13:39.400
the verge of bankruptcy. Now the company will bounce
271
00:13:39.400 --> 00:13:42.400
back but 93 is very tough moment
272
00:13:42.400 --> 00:13:45.300
in 95 acquisition of
273
00:13:45.300 --> 00:13:48.900
lotus Development Corporation everybody. Who
274
00:13:48.900 --> 00:13:51.700
knows what the spreadsheet is about. Maybe remember
275
00:13:51.700 --> 00:13:54.800
these nice period men frame
276
00:13:54.800 --> 00:13:57.700
soft the kids and computer super calculated.
277
00:13:57.800 --> 00:14:00.300
Deep blue defeats Casper off
278
00:14:00.300 --> 00:14:04.400
in chess game in 1997 the
279
00:14:03.400 --> 00:14:06.500
PC story which started in
280
00:14:06.500 --> 00:14:09.500
81 is going to stop in 2005 when the
281
00:14:09.500 --> 00:14:13.600
business is sold to the Chinese manufacturer Lenovo again
282
00:14:12.600 --> 00:14:15.700
supercomputer what's on
283
00:14:15.700 --> 00:14:18.500
very well known in 2011. But
284
00:14:18.500 --> 00:14:21.500
even though the company is historically in the Mainframe
285
00:14:21.500 --> 00:14:24.800
and super calculator. It's progressively getting
286
00:14:24.800 --> 00:14:28.500
towards Services cloud computing software.
287
00:14:27.500 --> 00:14:31.400
And in 2019, IBM
288
00:14:30.400 --> 00:14:34.100
bought red hat for 34 billion
289
00:14:33.100 --> 00:14:36.500
dollars quite a big figure and
290
00:14:36.500 --> 00:14:38.200
a good will of the balance it today.
291
00:14:39.200 --> 00:14:42.200
And the consequence of transforming the
292
00:14:42.200 --> 00:14:45.100
company is what we are discussing today, which is
293
00:14:45.100 --> 00:14:49.600
a spinoff of kendrail announced in 2020 realized
294
00:14:48.600 --> 00:14:51.300
in 2021. Now what about
295
00:14:51.300 --> 00:14:56.000
the evolution of sales and revenues at IBM early 1970
296
00:14:54.200 --> 00:14:57.800
billion and then a dramatic
297
00:14:57.800 --> 00:15:00.700
moment low point in 93 the
298
00:15:00.700 --> 00:15:03.200
company bounces back and is going
299
00:15:03.200 --> 00:15:06.700
to reach more than 100 billion dollars at the
300
00:15:06.700 --> 00:15:09.400
beginning of the 2010. But what do
301
00:15:09.400 --> 00:15:13.100
You observe during the last 10 years the revenues
302
00:15:12.100 --> 00:15:15.800
of the company progressively went down
303
00:15:15.800 --> 00:15:18.500
then stabilized, of course
304
00:15:18.500 --> 00:15:21.200
now it's down because of the spinoff of Kindle. But
305
00:15:21.200 --> 00:15:24.600
even if you add Kinder revenues to IBM revenues
306
00:15:24.600 --> 00:15:27.400
today, you understand that it's very difficult
307
00:15:27.400 --> 00:15:30.500
to grow. And in the meantime, the cloud business is
308
00:15:30.500 --> 00:15:33.100
running like hell interestingly. When you
309
00:15:33.100 --> 00:15:36.800
look at the value of the brand IBM, it
310
00:15:36.800 --> 00:15:39.100
was in 2013 when the capital
311
00:15:39.200 --> 00:15:42.700
That it's maximum value 79 billion
312
00:15:42.700 --> 00:15:45.500
dollars according to into brand and then
313
00:15:45.500 --> 00:15:48.700
it goes down with the sales with the revenues.
314
00:15:48.700 --> 00:15:51.800
Of course today. The company is still number 18 in
315
00:15:51.800 --> 00:15:54.300
the list with a brand value, which is 33 billion
316
00:15:54.300 --> 00:15:58.700
dollars, but it's quite far from the maximum of 2013.
317
00:15:59.600 --> 00:16:03.200
Interestingly there are number 18 number 13
318
00:16:02.200 --> 00:16:05.600
Facebook with 30 6 billion
319
00:16:05.600 --> 00:16:08.900
just a little bit more but apple is number one by far
320
00:16:08.900 --> 00:16:11.600
with 48 billion dollars of
321
00:16:11.600 --> 00:16:14.600
brand value nurses was about revenues but
322
00:16:14.600 --> 00:16:17.300
what about operating expenses? You know that there is
323
00:16:17.300 --> 00:16:20.300
an operating expense which is research and development. It's not
324
00:16:20.300 --> 00:16:23.600
an expense. It's not a cause it's an investment quite stable
325
00:16:23.600 --> 00:16:26.200
as a percentage to revenues. Of course,
326
00:16:26.200 --> 00:16:29.800
it goes up during the last three years not because the companies investing
327
00:16:29.800 --> 00:16:32.800
more in R&D, but because the company
328
00:16:32.800 --> 00:16:35.700
spinning off kendril is taking
329
00:16:35.700 --> 00:16:38.600
real out of the p&l and the balance
330
00:16:38.600 --> 00:16:39.500
sheet and the accounts
331
00:16:40.200 --> 00:16:43.700
As a consequence Kindle is a company with plenty of revenues are
332
00:16:43.700 --> 00:16:47.100
not much R&D. So if you have roughly the
333
00:16:46.100 --> 00:16:49.600
same amount of R&D and significantly res Revenue
334
00:16:49.600 --> 00:16:52.100
are indeed to revenue is up. It does not
335
00:16:52.100 --> 00:16:56.600
mean that you invest more it means that you spun off a non-r&d
336
00:16:55.600 --> 00:16:58.600
intensive business unit. But
337
00:16:58.600 --> 00:17:03.600
what is interesting to observe what happens to sgna in
338
00:17:02.600 --> 00:17:05.200
direct costs real costs
339
00:17:05.200 --> 00:17:08.400
well stable and then it's up and it's a
340
00:17:08.400 --> 00:17:11.200
by five percent. This is why at the
341
00:17:11.200 --> 00:17:14.400
end of the day the return on sales is down by five
342
00:17:14.400 --> 00:17:17.700
percent during the last years when you
343
00:17:17.700 --> 00:17:20.200
calculate the return on says which you combine with
344
00:17:20.200 --> 00:17:23.500
the assets to an over the assets productivity of
345
00:17:23.500 --> 00:17:26.400
the other company. What do you get Deport? No more formula the
346
00:17:26.400 --> 00:17:30.000
Roses the return on Capital employed the economic indicator.
347
00:17:30.700 --> 00:17:33.100
And then you understand that when the assets don't
348
00:17:33.100 --> 00:17:36.400
always dramatically down during the last year's as a consequence of
349
00:17:36.400 --> 00:17:39.300
Acquisitions. The main one is
350
00:17:39.300 --> 00:17:42.300
red hat in 2019 and the assets don't
351
00:17:42.300 --> 00:17:45.300
always collapsing because you put a lot of good will at the
352
00:17:45.300 --> 00:17:48.700
denominators level of C assets turnover what happens assets turnover
353
00:17:48.700 --> 00:17:49.000
is down.
354
00:17:49.900 --> 00:17:53.200
We don't sales is down return capital is definitely
355
00:17:52.200 --> 00:17:55.400
down to 10% today.
356
00:17:55.400 --> 00:17:58.100
Now, once we have described the evolution
357
00:17:58.100 --> 00:18:01.800
of the economic indicators of return on Capital employed. It's interesting
358
00:18:01.800 --> 00:18:04.400
to make the correlation with a stock price. You should
359
00:18:04.400 --> 00:18:07.800
look at 1985. The stock price is quite
360
00:18:07.800 --> 00:18:10.500
stable and then he's going to drop with a
361
00:18:10.500 --> 00:18:14.000
low point in 1993 near bankruptcy.
362
00:18:13.300 --> 00:18:16.100
Then there will be a recovery.
363
00:18:16.800 --> 00:18:19.500
And when the NASDAQ is very much down as a consequence
364
00:18:19.500 --> 00:18:22.500
of the explosion of the internet bubble. IBM is
365
00:18:22.500 --> 00:18:25.500
down but less why because a company shows
366
00:18:25.500 --> 00:18:28.100
some resilience low beta I will
367
00:18:28.100 --> 00:18:31.600
tell you in a minute that the beta range of IBM is
368
00:18:31.600 --> 00:18:33.300
significantly less than one.
369
00:18:34.300 --> 00:18:37.300
Stabilization increase and if you look at the last
370
00:18:37.300 --> 00:18:40.200
10 years you understand that stock prices a bit
371
00:18:40.200 --> 00:18:43.900
sad as a consequence of the declining economic
372
00:18:43.900 --> 00:18:46.400
performance of the company, it goes down.
373
00:18:46.400 --> 00:18:49.400
It seems to go a little bit bare the last
374
00:18:49.400 --> 00:18:52.200
month, but it's absolutely not fantastic.
375
00:18:53.900 --> 00:18:56.400
The Bay tide itself is in
376
00:18:56.400 --> 00:18:59.300
a Range, which is 0.4.8. Of course
377
00:18:59.300 --> 00:19:02.700
you remember that when you calculate an econometric beta sometimes
378
00:19:02.700 --> 00:19:05.700
it's very much up. Sometimes it's very much down even
379
00:19:05.700 --> 00:19:09.500
negative in the case of IBM sometimes but
380
00:19:08.500 --> 00:19:11.600
you understand that is a company
381
00:19:11.600 --> 00:19:15.600
is quite resilient 0.4 0.8. It's
382
00:19:15.600 --> 00:19:18.300
a robust company which goes throughout the
383
00:19:18.300 --> 00:19:21.500
turbulances. Now, it's always fundamental to
384
00:19:21.500 --> 00:19:24.900
make the correlation between the economic performance and value creation
385
00:19:24.900 --> 00:19:27.400
the relative value creation, which is a market to
386
00:19:27.400 --> 00:19:30.400
book Enterprise Value is market value of fancy
387
00:19:30.400 --> 00:19:33.200
plus net Financial that which is a value of
388
00:19:33.200 --> 00:19:36.800
the capital employ the value of the business operations and when
389
00:19:36.800 --> 00:19:39.300
you divide the value of business operations by how much
390
00:19:39.300 --> 00:19:42.700
is invested you get the relative value creation, which
391
00:19:42.700 --> 00:19:45.200
is obviously correlated with the economic
392
00:19:45.200 --> 00:19:48.500
performance the Rosie that with many
393
00:19:48.500 --> 00:19:51.000
companies and IBM is the same
394
00:19:51.300 --> 00:19:53.600
as the rest of the planet. There's a strong
395
00:19:53.900 --> 00:19:56.300
Station between the rousse and the market to
396
00:19:56.300 --> 00:19:59.700
book it's fascinating. Now. Let's go back to Kindle which
397
00:19:59.700 --> 00:20:02.400
is spun off from IBM kin drill
398
00:20:02.400 --> 00:20:05.400
is definitely in the roots in the historical roots in
399
00:20:05.400 --> 00:20:06.600
the past of five year.
400
00:20:07.200 --> 00:20:09.400
But there's a company have a future.
401
00:20:10.200 --> 00:20:13.400
If you look at the recent years, the revenues are down.
402
00:20:13.400 --> 00:20:16.700
The sales are down in 2018. Looking
403
00:20:16.700 --> 00:20:19.100
at the financial communication provided by
404
00:20:19.100 --> 00:20:22.900
the company the revenues where almost 22 billion
405
00:20:22.900 --> 00:20:26.600
today. It is a bit more than 18.5
406
00:20:25.600 --> 00:20:29.000
billion dollars. So declining in
407
00:20:28.600 --> 00:20:31.800
the meantime, as a
408
00:20:31.800 --> 00:20:35.300
percentage to revenue is down and capex
409
00:20:34.300 --> 00:20:37.400
as a percentage to revenue is down. Of
410
00:20:37.400 --> 00:20:40.100
course you pay your capex with your big die. If you remember
411
00:20:40.100 --> 00:20:43.400
the concept of the free cash flow. This is why the
412
00:20:43.400 --> 00:20:46.800
company is investing as a profitabetes declining the
413
00:20:46.800 --> 00:20:49.200
commercial activity is declining which is
414
00:20:49.200 --> 00:20:52.600
not very attractive for an investor. Of course,
415
00:20:52.600 --> 00:20:55.500
you have the company the former CFO of
416
00:20:55.500 --> 00:20:58.200
IBM size. Now, we are standing alone.
417
00:20:58.200 --> 00:21:01.200
We have gaining agility and we
418
00:21:01.200 --> 00:21:04.200
are going to be able to bounce back but it has to be
419
00:21:04.200 --> 00:21:07.600
demonstrated. Now what happened to Kindle since
420
00:21:07.600 --> 00:21:09.900
the listing at the end of October?
421
00:21:10.200 --> 00:21:14.400
2021 the opening stock price 20 seconds
422
00:21:14.400 --> 00:21:18.300
of October in the morning is $50 and it's
423
00:21:18.300 --> 00:21:21.500
represents an Enterprise Value, which is five to
424
00:21:21.500 --> 00:21:24.300
six times the ability a few weeks
425
00:21:24.300 --> 00:21:27.800
later the 16th of November the stock
426
00:21:27.800 --> 00:21:30.600
prices under 20 starting from
427
00:21:30.600 --> 00:21:31.200
50.
428
00:21:32.100 --> 00:21:35.900
In 22, it's going to get to a low point which is about 10
429
00:21:35.900 --> 00:21:38.200
dollars and today it stands within the
430
00:21:38.200 --> 00:21:40.100
range which is 11 to 13.
431
00:21:41.400 --> 00:21:44.600
That means a market capitalization which multiplied bus
432
00:21:44.600 --> 00:21:47.600
number of shares outstanding is about 2.6 billion dollars.
433
00:21:48.500 --> 00:21:51.500
When you add 1 billion dollar of net
434
00:21:51.500 --> 00:21:54.600
financial debt, you get to an Enterprise Value, which is 3.6 billion
435
00:21:54.600 --> 00:21:57.700
dollars. It is less than twice yet
436
00:21:57.700 --> 00:22:00.700
just a bit da so you understand that. The credibility
437
00:22:00.700 --> 00:22:02.100
of the company is low.
438
00:22:02.900 --> 00:22:05.700
When you look at the graph of the New York Stock Exchange
439
00:22:05.700 --> 00:22:08.200
as opposed to Kindle New York
440
00:22:08.200 --> 00:22:12.300
Stock Exchange went down gradually down but kind real was significant
441
00:22:11.300 --> 00:22:14.600
drop and then it followed the
442
00:22:14.600 --> 00:22:17.300
Marquette and in addition to that. The last news
443
00:22:17.300 --> 00:22:20.600
are not very optimistic on the 31st
444
00:22:20.600 --> 00:22:23.300
of May 2022 a few
445
00:22:23.300 --> 00:22:26.300
days ago the walls an announcement made by
446
00:22:26.300 --> 00:22:30.400
the court of Houston, Texas BMC Software
447
00:22:30.400 --> 00:22:33.900
had a case against IBM because IBM
448
00:22:33.900 --> 00:22:36.800
store one big client American Telephone
449
00:22:36.800 --> 00:22:39.800
and Telegraph, this is quite a big one. Now. The
450
00:22:39.800 --> 00:22:43.100
Houston Court said this is absolutely illegal practice
451
00:22:42.100 --> 00:22:45.400
and IBM has to pay a fine of
452
00:22:45.400 --> 00:22:48.200
1.6 billion dollars what happens to
453
00:22:48.200 --> 00:22:51.500
stock price of IBM not much. But what happened
454
00:22:51.500 --> 00:22:55.100
to the stock price of kinville minus 11%
455
00:22:54.100 --> 00:22:57.600
why because Kindle might
456
00:22:57.600 --> 00:23:00.400
be involved in the dispute and in charge
457
00:23:00.400 --> 00:23:02.400
of paying the bill so clearly
458
00:23:02.900 --> 00:23:05.400
Is not very nice for Kindle as far
459
00:23:05.400 --> 00:23:08.000
as IBM is concerned life is absolutely great.
460
00:23:08.800 --> 00:23:11.300
If you look at the evolution of the stock price of
461
00:23:11.300 --> 00:23:15.600
IBM since the spin-off first mechanically
462
00:23:14.600 --> 00:23:17.400
the stock price of IBM is
463
00:23:17.400 --> 00:23:20.400
down. Why because basically you take
464
00:23:20.400 --> 00:23:23.400
some value of the campaign and it is out of the
465
00:23:23.400 --> 00:23:27.500
company 50 dollars per share presumably and
466
00:23:27.500 --> 00:23:30.300
divided by five. It is about $10 per share.
467
00:23:30.300 --> 00:23:33.200
So the stock price is down by 10 dollars mechanically.
468
00:23:34.200 --> 00:23:37.400
And interestingly a few weeks later back to
469
00:23:37.400 --> 00:23:40.200
the initial position. If you look at the evolution of
470
00:23:40.200 --> 00:23:43.500
the NASDAQ IBM of z-correlated and then it's
471
00:23:43.500 --> 00:23:46.900
a correlated again with a NASDAQ as if nothing happened
472
00:23:46.900 --> 00:23:49.300
then IBM and the
473
00:23:49.300 --> 00:23:53.000
nice Dax, they follow the same path and interestingly what happens
474
00:23:52.400 --> 00:23:55.700
in the beginning of April. NASDAQ is
475
00:23:55.700 --> 00:23:58.500
significantly down and IBM is
476
00:23:58.500 --> 00:24:02.200
doing well. So you understand that the company has
477
00:24:01.200 --> 00:24:05.700
a reputation of resilience stability
478
00:24:04.700 --> 00:24:07.600
and probably getting rid
479
00:24:07.600 --> 00:24:10.800
of Kindred is quite good news for the company after the
480
00:24:10.800 --> 00:24:12.200
announcement of the first quarter.
481
00:24:13.200 --> 00:24:16.400
Now what about the return on investment? If you are an IBM
482
00:24:16.400 --> 00:24:19.300
shareholder imagine that on the 20th of October
483
00:24:19.300 --> 00:24:22.400
you hold five IBM shares.
484
00:24:23.100 --> 00:24:26.000
The wells is five times the stock price the stock
485
00:24:26.200 --> 00:24:30.200
prices by hand 35 times. It's 600 and 675. Now
486
00:24:29.200 --> 00:24:32.300
you receive one kind real share
487
00:24:32.300 --> 00:24:35.000
which is supposedly worth $50,
488
00:24:35.700 --> 00:24:38.700
but you still have your five IBM shares and you're
489
00:24:38.700 --> 00:24:40.000
worse has not changed.
490
00:24:40.900 --> 00:24:43.500
So in October 21, the IBM share
491
00:24:43.500 --> 00:24:46.500
is down to 122. It's down
492
00:24:46.500 --> 00:24:49.800
by about $10, which is fifty dollars
493
00:24:49.800 --> 00:24:52.700
Kindle divided by five one can
494
00:24:52.700 --> 00:24:55.700
really share for five IBM shares. So your
495
00:24:55.700 --> 00:24:58.300
new quotes Wells is five times
496
00:24:58.300 --> 00:25:01.400
a stock price for IBM plus the value of
497
00:25:01.400 --> 00:25:04.800
Kindred which is supposedly again 15. It's
498
00:25:04.800 --> 00:25:07.000
about 660 quite the same.
499
00:25:07.900 --> 00:25:10.500
But again, it's quite the same if the Kinder
500
00:25:10.500 --> 00:25:13.500
is stock price is supposedly remaining at its initial
501
00:25:13.500 --> 00:25:17.100
value of $50, which is absolutely not the case. Now,
502
00:25:16.100 --> 00:25:19.500
if you look at the return investment for an
503
00:25:19.500 --> 00:25:22.300
IBM shareholders today, not shortly after
504
00:25:22.300 --> 00:25:26.100
the listing of Kindle. You still have your five IBM
505
00:25:25.100 --> 00:25:28.800
shares imagine that you capture. What is
506
00:25:28.800 --> 00:25:31.900
the stock price of IBM today 141
507
00:25:31.900 --> 00:25:34.500
multiplied by 5 plus 11 is
508
00:25:34.500 --> 00:25:37.800
716 now life
509
00:25:37.800 --> 00:25:40.400
is okay for the IBM shareholders you remember
510
00:25:40.400 --> 00:25:40.600
you
511
00:25:40.900 --> 00:25:43.900
Hold five IBM shares your wealth
512
00:25:43.900 --> 00:25:46.900
is 675. Now your wealthy
513
00:25:46.900 --> 00:25:49.500
716 in the meantime,
514
00:25:49.500 --> 00:25:52.800
the NASDAQ has collapsed and so you understand that kind
515
00:25:52.800 --> 00:25:55.900
real is a little bit quote marginal in
516
00:25:55.900 --> 00:25:58.800
the calculation of the return investment for the IBM
517
00:25:58.800 --> 00:26:01.800
shareholders. The good news for IBM
518
00:26:01.800 --> 00:26:04.200
is at the company demonstrated that
519
00:26:04.200 --> 00:26:07.900
it was quite resilient. When the
520
00:26:07.900 --> 00:26:11.100
NASDAQ was dropping now, your
521
00:26:10.100 --> 00:26:13.400
IBM Kindra is out of the picture.
522
00:26:13.400 --> 00:26:16.900
It's completely marginal. It's no more problem and
523
00:26:16.900 --> 00:26:19.200
you can concentrate on the development of
524
00:26:19.200 --> 00:26:22.900
the cloud and the growth is supposedly back
525
00:26:22.900 --> 00:26:23.700
for the company.
526
00:26:24.800 --> 00:26:27.400
Now it was a case but a very
527
00:26:27.400 --> 00:26:31.200
specific case I observed plenty of spin-offs
528
00:26:30.200 --> 00:26:33.700
and I will have the opportunity to describe a
529
00:26:33.700 --> 00:26:37.300
few of them later in the future of the academy. Now,
530
00:26:36.300 --> 00:26:39.600
let me tell you there are as many
531
00:26:39.600 --> 00:26:43.300
value creation patterns as spin-off
532
00:26:42.300 --> 00:26:45.700
situations every case
533
00:26:45.700 --> 00:26:48.900
is quite specific and extremely interesting
534
00:26:48.900 --> 00:26:51.500
to observe which we'll do a little
535
00:26:51.500 --> 00:26:52.200
bit in the future.
536
00:26:53.600 --> 00:26:54.200
Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to this film which is devoted to an extremely important subject spin-off spin-off is very relevant today in Karen business situation.
It's considered by a number of companies.
Now I'm going to use the case of Kindle spun off from IBM quite recently in October 2020 IBM announced at the company's going to list.
It's it infrastructure Services Unit, which is going to be named Kindred.
It's represents something like 20 billion dollars of revenues out of the total of 80 billion for IBM as a whole.
Well, it's 25% of the revenues but it is also half of the capital expenditures.
So you understand that this activity is slightly more Capital intensive at the rest of IBM and it is less profitable in a commercial point of view.
If you look at the return on sales e b d a overseas over revenues.
It's about 11 12% for the it infrastructure business.
Prospectus provided by a Kindle and 10K report now today kendril is out of IBM and what's remains hybrid cloud computing Consulting software.
The big deal of sales is 26% So you understand that the assets turnover is higher for IBM, excluding Kindle and the return on service is higher.
So definitely they want to get rid of this non-strategic asset.
It's announced in October 2020.
It's going to be completed in October 2021 now kendril is listed ticker KD on New York Stock Exchange before we get back to the case.
I would like that we spend some time discussing the motivations of companies when they decide to spin off and the various methods which are used by this companies.
What about motivations first? It's about getting rid of non-core non-strategy asset it comes from where it comes from the fact that in the 70s and 80s, they were conglomerates with core and non-core assets Diversified conglomerates terrible reputations.
And by the way, this is why the market for corporate control emerge in 1980s as a consequence of freeing the market from any constraint.
That's another story.
Now, what does it mean non-core for a telecommunication operator you remember we discuss that in a video quite recently the towers why because Towers about relay State a piece of land a mask and so on not very strategic on a technology called point of view What is strategy is the location? This is why as a company I get rid of the towers, but I negotiate a long term contract or agreement with American Tower or sell next 32 years four times eight years long-term location is again strategic.
Beforehand.
I was keeping at home my mass my Towers.
But today I observed as they are seemingly over evaluated.
What do I do? This? Non-strategy asset is really nonstrategy because I can sell it now at the price which is more than it's quotes fundamental value out of the picture.
Sometimes it's very easy, you know the food company Denon Denon is in dairy product mineral water baby care baby food.
And then on Once Upon a Time was in a champagne business for any reason champagne is luxury good baby food, baby care and mineral watery consumable Goods.
There's no reason why you should keep the champagne business and it was sold in order to find on some Acquisitions in a consumer good business and of the motivation, which is quite interesting to analyze on a strategic point of view.
Sometimes the mother company can be a constraint for the business development of the activity.
It's exactly the case of the car industry decades ago.
Gm4.
They were very much integrated and they were producing Parts components modules.
So you understand that if you are producing the mold, you are the part for GM.
It's a bit difficult to sell the same stuff to four or to be NW.
Now this town was spun off from Ford.
Delphi was spun off from General Motors for Asia was a controlling into S4 pairs app agency train now stellantis after the merger with FCA now for Asia is absolutely independent from PSA and from stantis.
Now the spinoff is very important for the product development of the company.
When you are a parts supplier a new contribute to the development of a car.
What do you know plenty of information confidential about what the product in the end will look like in two three four years time.
And of course this information should not be shared.
Now imagine that you are the auto part division of Ford imagine that GM wants to ask you to develop a part for a new product which is going to be launched into three years time.
Then you have access to confidential information for GM.
And you are a subsidiary and you are a division working for four.
There's a little bit potential conflict of interest.
So you want to get out of that now Vista Airlines completely quote in their pattern from four and then it can serve food and GM and any car manufacturer on the planet.
So you understand that being out of allows you to get for further development.
Sometimes the objective is to show the real value of an asset which is absolutely not visible in the balance sheet and in the business operations of the company, so you want to show the real value you make this pin off.
Sometimes you want to give agility keep that in mind because I'm going to discuss that in a couple of minutes.
But sometimes a motivations are not that prestigious I would say you remember the case of Coca-Cola on the bottling activity Why Did Coca Cola God read of the bottling activity to improve the financial ratios first of them economic profit to avoid being taken over and increase the stock price.
So you want to improve the ratios.
It's not about industry.
It's about ratio.
Also, sometimes the companies want to transfer a little bit of debt when there is too much debt in a company use pin-off and you load this spernoff company with a little bit of debt which reduces your own inadaptedness.
Of course, it is not regarded as a main objective, but it's quite important in the process as well.
Now, let's go back a minute on agility.
Imagine that you are in charge of an activity of a business unit inside a big group.
Your business is quite specific.
It's quite different from the rest of the company and you have the feeling that you are not very much understood by the sea level the top guys and these guys you have to discuss plenty of other issues.
You are quite small and they don't have enough time to devote to your activity.
So you are a little bit left alone.
You understand the rationality of spinning off.
If you are out of the pictures and your sea level is going to take care of your business activity and that's much more important.
You will have the possibility to attract new customers generate economies of you gain in agility in strategy and operating agility.
And it is very true for activities with very different business economics.
And as a consequence very different Financial metrics imagine for example, your Capital intensive business in a large group, which is very light in terms of capex consumption.
If you are capital intensive what's very important is a return on Capital.
It's to attract long term customers long-term contracts Rick your own and more revenues, but for the group, you know, the Rosa is much less important because Capital employees negligible and what is important is a churn right? So you understand that you don't speak the same language.
You don't have the same Financial metrics then it's good idea to spin off.
Different methods you can simply sell the business to private Equity to another company in industrial activity itself.
When the acquiring company is overloaded with that it becomes a leverage buyout sometimes management leverage management buyout and as a alternative is a split up imagine that in a group.
There are three different activities a b and c there is no Synergy between these activities or quite minimum synergies.
What do you do you split up and you create three different entities.
There are not owned by any holding any more and they have their own separate life.
You remember the IPO Volvo from GLE.
It's about listing the business unit as neighbor carve out as fast technology is concerned imagine that in your are in the labs.
You have develop the specific technology, which you can protect with the pattern intellectual property and so on and so forth, but this technology is not part of your technology called strategy is not part of your business strategy.
What do you do you put The team and the patterns in a separate entity and these guys start running the business buys himself.
It happens very often when companies have a strategy of corporate venturing.
It's been out and the last ones about spin-off which simply means that you are going to distribute the shares for example to the existing shareholders, which is a case of IBM.
The IBM shareholders received one kindral share for each and every five IBM shares.
So you have five IDM shares and as a dividend tax impact, you're going to receive one kind real share.
Of course the value of your portfolio is not changed by one penny, but what is very important is that now? It's split into IBM standing alone and Kindle spun off now, it's impossible to speak about IBM without looking at the past and a fantastic history of this iconic firm.
The company is going to be formally created in 1911 and will become International Business Machines in 1924.
In 1914.
The CEO is Thomas Watson senior.
He's going to be the CEO up to 1956 and he's going to be replaced by Thomas Watson Jr.
That's fantastic.
Isn't it in 1915 the Moto of the companies created sink and you remember that Steve Jobs slightly changed the stories with Apple Computers a few decades there.
In 1934 in the middle of the crisis when there is a big depression in the United States people are paid by the peace and then Watson is going to replace that by a fixed salary, which is a fantastic social Improvement for the employees at IBM.
now in 1952 the first real manframe computer IBM seven or one a few years later and 64.
They're very famous IBM system 360 and also with word processing starts its history and the group is transferred into armock New York the head office now is there In 1966 the digital random access memory is no more in the hands of IBM as you know today but it was created invented in the labs of the company in 1966 and also invention from the lab but one under brought a French mathematician invented the fractal geometry, which is very much different from the very famous goals log normal distribution of returns, which is widely used by academics in economics and finance.
This is why I'm under broad was not very much accepted by the academic world, even though what it describes it's much closer to the reality.
It happens in the academic world.
It was 1967 a few years later speech recognition the invention of the floppy disk 1971 the first IBM PC as a response to Apple and some others shows in 1981.
It is developed in the skunk work process in order to avoid pollution from the main frame developers and so on so forth now IBM looks very strong.
Robust one century old company.
Well, sometimes it was quite fragile and when Luke gerstner becomes a CEO in 1993 is a company is on the verge of bankruptcy.
Now the company will bounce back but 93 is very tough moment in 95 acquisition of lotus Development Corporation everybody.
Who knows what the spreadsheet is about.
Maybe remember these nice period men frame soft the kids and computer super calculated.
Deep blue defeats Casper off in chess game in 1997 the PC story which started in 81 is going to stop in 2005 when the business is sold to the Chinese manufacturer Lenovo again supercomputer what's on very well known in 2011.
But even though the company is historically in the Mainframe and super calculator.
It's progressively getting towards Services cloud computing software.
And in 2019, IBM bought red hat for 34 billion dollars quite a big figure and a good will of the balance it today.
And the consequence of transforming the company is what we are discussing today, which is a spinoff of kendrail announced in 2020 realized in 2021.
Now what about the evolution of sales and revenues at IBM early 1970 billion and then a dramatic moment low point in 93 the company bounces back and is going to reach more than 100 billion dollars at the beginning of the 2010.
But what do You observe during the last 10 years the revenues of the company progressively went down then stabilized, of course now it's down because of the spinoff of Kindle.
But even if you add Kinder revenues to IBM revenues today, you understand that it's very difficult to grow.
And in the meantime, the cloud business is running like hell interestingly.
When you look at the value of the brand IBM, it was in 2013 when the capital That it's maximum value 79 billion dollars according to into brand and then it goes down with the sales with the revenues.
Of course today.
The company is still number 18 in the list with a brand value, which is 33 billion dollars, but it's quite far from the maximum of 2013.
Interestingly there are number 18 number 13 Facebook with 30 6 billion just a little bit more but apple is number one by far with 48 billion dollars of brand value nurses was about revenues but what about operating expenses? You know that there is an operating expense which is research and development.
It's not an expense.
It's not a cause it's an investment quite stable as a percentage to revenues.
Of course, it goes up during the last three years not because the companies investing more in R&D, but because the company spinning off kendril is taking real out of the p&l and the balance sheet and the accounts As a consequence Kindle is a company with plenty of revenues are not much R&D.
So if you have roughly the same amount of R&D and significantly res Revenue are indeed to revenue is up.
It does not mean that you invest more it means that you spun off a non-r&d intensive business unit.
But what is interesting to observe what happens to sgna in direct costs real costs well stable and then it's up and it's a by five percent.
This is why at the end of the day the return on sales is down by five percent during the last years when you calculate the return on says which you combine with the assets to an over the assets productivity of the other company.
What do you get Deport? No more formula the Roses the return on Capital employed the economic indicator.
And then you understand that when the assets don't always dramatically down during the last year's as a consequence of Acquisitions.
The main one is red hat in 2019 and the assets don't always collapsing because you put a lot of good will at the denominators level of C assets turnover what happens assets turnover is down.
We don't sales is down return capital is definitely down to 10% today.
Now, once we have described the evolution of the economic indicators of return on Capital employed.
It's interesting to make the correlation with a stock price.
You should look at 1985.
The stock price is quite stable and then he's going to drop with a low point in 1993 near bankruptcy.
Then there will be a recovery.
And when the NASDAQ is very much down as a consequence of the explosion of the internet bubble.
IBM is down but less why because a company shows some resilience low beta I will tell you in a minute that the beta range of IBM is significantly less than one.
Stabilization increase and if you look at the last 10 years you understand that stock prices a bit sad as a consequence of the declining economic performance of the company, it goes down.
It seems to go a little bit bare the last month, but it's absolutely not fantastic.
The Bay tide itself is in a Range, which is 0.4.8.
Of course you remember that when you calculate an econometric beta sometimes it's very much up.
Sometimes it's very much down even negative in the case of IBM sometimes but you understand that is a company is quite resilient 0.4 0.8.
It's a robust company which goes throughout the turbulances.
Now, it's always fundamental to make the correlation between the economic performance and value creation the relative value creation, which is a market to book Enterprise Value is market value of fancy plus net Financial that which is a value of the capital employ the value of the business operations and when you divide the value of business operations by how much is invested you get the relative value creation, which is obviously correlated with the economic performance the Rosie that with many companies and IBM is the same as the rest of the planet.
There's a strong Station between the rousse and the market to book it's fascinating.
Now.
Let's go back to Kindle which is spun off from IBM kin drill is definitely in the roots in the historical roots in the past of five year.
But there's a company have a future.
If you look at the recent years, the revenues are down.
The sales are down in 2018.
Looking at the financial communication provided by the company the revenues where almost 22 billion today.
It is a bit more than 18.5 billion dollars.
So declining in the meantime, as a percentage to revenue is down and capex as a percentage to revenue is down.
Of course you pay your capex with your big die.
If you remember the concept of the free cash flow.
This is why the company is investing as a profitabetes declining the commercial activity is declining which is not very attractive for an investor.
Of course, you have the company the former CFO of IBM size.
Now, we are standing alone.
We have gaining agility and we are going to be able to bounce back but it has to be demonstrated.
Now what happened to Kindle since the listing at the end of October? 2021 the opening stock price 20 seconds of October in the morning is $50 and it's represents an Enterprise Value, which is five to six times the ability a few weeks later the 16th of November the stock prices under 20 starting from 50.
In 22, it's going to get to a low point which is about 10 dollars and today it stands within the range which is 11 to 13.
That means a market capitalization which multiplied bus number of shares outstanding is about 2.6 billion dollars.
When you add 1 billion dollar of net financial debt, you get to an Enterprise Value, which is 3.6 billion dollars.
It is less than twice yet just a bit da so you understand that.
The credibility of the company is low.
When you look at the graph of the New York Stock Exchange as opposed to Kindle New York Stock Exchange went down gradually down but kind real was significant drop and then it followed the Marquette and in addition to that.
The last news are not very optimistic on the 31st of May 2022 a few days ago the walls an announcement made by the court of Houston, Texas BMC Software had a case against IBM because IBM store one big client American Telephone and Telegraph, this is quite a big one.
Now.
The Houston Court said this is absolutely illegal practice and IBM has to pay a fine of 1.6 billion dollars what happens to stock price of IBM not much.
But what happened to the stock price of kinville minus 11% why because Kindle might be involved in the dispute and in charge of paying the bill so clearly Is not very nice for Kindle as far as IBM is concerned life is absolutely great.
If you look at the evolution of the stock price of IBM since the spin-off first mechanically the stock price of IBM is down.
Why because basically you take some value of the campaign and it is out of the company 50 dollars per share presumably and divided by five.
It is about $10 per share.
So the stock price is down by 10 dollars mechanically.
And interestingly a few weeks later back to the initial position.
If you look at the evolution of the NASDAQ IBM of z-correlated and then it's a correlated again with a NASDAQ as if nothing happened then IBM and the nice Dax, they follow the same path and interestingly what happens in the beginning of April.
NASDAQ is significantly down and IBM is doing well.
So you understand that the company has a reputation of resilience stability and probably getting rid of Kindred is quite good news for the company after the announcement of the first quarter.
Now what about the return on investment? If you are an IBM shareholder imagine that on the 20th of October you hold five IBM shares.
The wells is five times the stock price the stock prices by hand 35 times.
It's 600 and 675.
Now you receive one kind real share which is supposedly worth $50, but you still have your five IBM shares and you're worse has not changed.
So in October 21, the IBM share is down to 122.
It's down by about $10, which is fifty dollars Kindle divided by five one can really share for five IBM shares.
So your new quotes Wells is five times a stock price for IBM plus the value of Kindred which is supposedly again 15.
It's about 660 quite the same.
But again, it's quite the same if the Kinder is stock price is supposedly remaining at its initial value of $50, which is absolutely not the case.
Now, if you look at the return investment for an IBM shareholders today, not shortly after the listing of Kindle.
You still have your five IBM shares imagine that you capture.
What is the stock price of IBM today 141 multiplied by 5 plus 11 is 716 now life is okay for the IBM shareholders you remember you Hold five IBM shares your wealth is 675.
Now your wealthy 716 in the meantime, the NASDAQ has collapsed and so you understand that kind real is a little bit quote marginal in the calculation of the return investment for the IBM shareholders.
The good news for IBM is at the company demonstrated that it was quite resilient.
When the NASDAQ was dropping now, your IBM Kindra is out of the picture.
It's completely marginal.
It's no more problem and you can concentrate on the development of the cloud and the growth is supposedly back for the company.
Now it was a case but a very specific case I observed plenty of spin-offs and I will have the opportunity to describe a few of them later in the future of the academy.
Now, let me tell you there are as many value creation patterns as spin-off situations every case is quite specific and extremely interesting to observe which we'll do a little bit in the future.
Thank you very much.