September 2023 Educational film // Nongfu Spring: How to transform water into gold
Not all Chinese billionaires are in technology
Portrait of one of the great non-technological fortunes of the Chinese economy, Nonfu Springs.
Nongfu Springs is a Chinese bottled water and beverage company headquartered in Hangzhou’s Xihu district. It is owned and chaired by its founder Zhong Shanshan.
The company recorded sales of 24 billion yuan (US$3.4 billion) in 2019, up from 20.47 billion yuan a year earlier.
Thanks to growth and acquisitions, Nongfu Spring has become China’s largest bottled water producer and one of the top three producers in the bottled tea and juice market.
Professor Jacquet explains and analyzes the company in detail.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:07.540 --> 00:00:12.170
Hello and welcome in this film, which contrary to what its title suggests,
2
00:00:12.470 --> 00:00:17.290
is not dedicated to alchemy or the transmutation of materials of
3
00:00:17.290 --> 00:00:18.030
any kind,
4
00:00:18.030 --> 00:00:23.010
but to known full spring a Chinese company that made the
5
00:00:23.010 --> 00:00:25.770
fortune of its founder and owner.
6
00:00:26.950 --> 00:00:31.210
You could imagine that the richest person in China comes from the tech universe,
7
00:00:31.420 --> 00:00:34.050
which is creating petty of billionaires around the world.
8
00:00:34.790 --> 00:00:39.650
Not exactly the richest person is a leader in mineral
9
00:00:39.650 --> 00:00:44.650
water, which is not exactly what you would qualify as an high tech business.
10
00:00:46.230 --> 00:00:50.770
Of course there's a difference between the wealth of an individual and the value
11
00:00:50.770 --> 00:00:54.330
of the company. If you look at the market capitalization in China,
12
00:00:54.960 --> 00:00:59.370
tech versus water number one, 10 cent, c e o,
13
00:00:59.510 --> 00:01:01.050
pan Ma, very well known,
14
00:01:01.640 --> 00:01:05.850
$400 billion Alibaba, Jack Ma,
15
00:01:06.150 --> 00:01:10.170
$240 billion and long full springing only
16
00:01:10.580 --> 00:01:12.170
$64 billion.
17
00:01:12.990 --> 00:01:17.290
But John Han whose nickname is the lone wolf,
18
00:01:18.130 --> 00:01:22.330
somebody who is quite discreet holds 84%.
19
00:01:23.230 --> 00:01:28.050
So what is very interesting is that known for spring is a fantastic economic and
20
00:01:28.050 --> 00:01:31.850
financial success, quite discreet under the radar,
21
00:01:32.430 --> 00:01:37.210
but this success has been generated by the company without diluting the
22
00:01:37.210 --> 00:01:41.930
founder, owner of the company, which is basically the subject of this film.
23
00:01:43.030 --> 00:01:45.770
If we go back to the valuation of known food springing,
24
00:01:45.870 --> 00:01:49.450
the company is private until September, 2020,
25
00:01:50.050 --> 00:01:52.370
i p o on the Hong Kong stock exchange,
26
00:01:52.960 --> 00:01:55.290
Hong Kong means H shares.
27
00:01:55.490 --> 00:01:59.570
I will elaborate a little bit later on about A versus H shares.
28
00:02:00.110 --> 00:02:05.010
The offered price is 21.5 Hong Kong dollars. The closing price,
29
00:02:05.230 --> 00:02:07.930
the first day of the listing is $35.
30
00:02:09.230 --> 00:02:13.050
Now the company issuing almost 400 million shares,
31
00:02:13.300 --> 00:02:18.010
which represents only 3.5% of the total number of
32
00:02:18.010 --> 00:02:18.850
shares outstanding.
33
00:02:19.270 --> 00:02:23.170
The company is going to raise 8.5 billion Hong Kong dollars,
34
00:02:23.170 --> 00:02:27.690
which represents a little bit more than $1 billion. But interestingly,
35
00:02:27.990 --> 00:02:29.730
the same year in 2020,
36
00:02:30.150 --> 00:02:34.210
the company's going to distribute a dividend of 8 billion Hong Kong dollars.
37
00:02:34.880 --> 00:02:38.490
It's as if the money which comes from the shares issue is distributed.
38
00:02:38.630 --> 00:02:41.370
The shareholders in 2019,
39
00:02:41.470 --> 00:02:46.450
the year before the dividend represented $9.6 billion.
40
00:02:46.510 --> 00:02:50.130
Though you can conclude that at the end of the day the company on a financial
41
00:02:50.130 --> 00:02:52.250
point of view did not need the I P O.
42
00:02:52.960 --> 00:02:55.570
What happened after the I P O first,
43
00:02:55.740 --> 00:03:00.560
there was a fantastic increase in stock price completely correlated from the
44
00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:03.200
market. The Hong is a little bit up,
45
00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:08.160
the non full springing stock price is skyrocketing then back to reality and
46
00:03:08.160 --> 00:03:10.680
what is very interesting, if you look at the last month,
47
00:03:11.380 --> 00:03:13.840
non food springing stock price is quite stable.
48
00:03:14.500 --> 00:03:18.640
Boring I would say when the Hong Index is down
49
00:03:19.350 --> 00:03:21.760
from the very beginning to the end of this period,
50
00:03:21.820 --> 00:03:26.520
if you look at non food break stock prices plus 20% plus 22
51
00:03:26.520 --> 00:03:30.480
exactly, plus the dividend you have to add if you want to calculate the total
52
00:03:30.480 --> 00:03:32.400
shareholders return. In the meantime,
53
00:03:32.500 --> 00:03:35.960
the Hong Index is down by 25%.
54
00:03:36.140 --> 00:03:39.320
So at the end the day it's quite a good story for the non-food spring
55
00:03:39.320 --> 00:03:43.520
shareholders, today's stock price is 44 Hong Kong dollars,
56
00:03:43.730 --> 00:03:48.560
which represents a capitalization of 500 billion Hong Kong
57
00:03:48.560 --> 00:03:53.320
dollars and Mr. Han owes 84% of that,
58
00:03:53.900 --> 00:03:55.000
but that not all.
59
00:03:55.510 --> 00:03:59.240
He's also the controlling interest of a company in the pharma business whose
60
00:03:59.240 --> 00:04:02.840
name is Beijing Onetime biological pharmacy.
61
00:04:03.100 --> 00:04:05.480
He owes 75%. He seems that Mr.
62
00:04:05.860 --> 00:04:10.320
Han enjoys very much keeping the control of the assets plus some other
63
00:04:10.590 --> 00:04:12.680
various mission assets.
64
00:04:13.020 --> 00:04:15.880
At the end of the day is total waste is evaluated at
65
00:04:15.880 --> 00:04:20.080
$62.4 billion according to Forbes,
66
00:04:20.700 --> 00:04:24.760
number one in China, number 20 worldwide.
67
00:04:25.180 --> 00:04:28.520
So he's a very, very wealthy, successful person.
68
00:04:29.720 --> 00:04:34.720
A few words about A versus H shares A means
69
00:04:34.720 --> 00:04:39.680
that the company is listed on the Shanghai or Xang Zhen stock market
70
00:04:40.740 --> 00:04:45.240
and a means that these shares are reserved to mainland citizens,
71
00:04:45.470 --> 00:04:46.680
Chinese citizens,
72
00:04:46.980 --> 00:04:51.320
and to some other investors which are named qualified investors.
73
00:04:52.320 --> 00:04:54.240
H means Hong Kong stock exchange,
74
00:04:54.240 --> 00:04:58.000
it's quite free in terms of access A is very restricted.
75
00:04:58.460 --> 00:05:02.880
Now the qualified foreign institutional investors is a very
76
00:05:02.990 --> 00:05:07.720
restrictive club of foreign investors who are allowed to buy and
77
00:05:07.750 --> 00:05:11.760
sell and trade Asia shares in Shanghai. In Shanghai,
78
00:05:13.040 --> 00:05:17.560
interestingly, I visited the China Securities Regulatory Commission website,
79
00:05:17.810 --> 00:05:20.880
which gives a list of these very selective club.
80
00:05:21.550 --> 00:05:26.440
It's a selective club with more than 550 members in which you can
81
00:05:26.440 --> 00:05:29.000
find the large international banks.
82
00:05:29.780 --> 00:05:33.880
The first one to join the list in 2003 is U B s,
83
00:05:34.100 --> 00:05:37.280
but followed by Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley,
84
00:05:37.700 --> 00:05:39.160
all the large banks are there,
85
00:05:40.110 --> 00:05:43.240
obviously asset managers because it's about trading stocks.
86
00:05:43.820 --> 00:05:46.960
The first to join the list is a Japanese company,
87
00:05:47.380 --> 00:05:51.800
no Secur is followed by BlackRock, MDI and so on so forth.
88
00:05:52.380 --> 00:05:56.280
But if you look at the list, there are some interesting names in the others,
89
00:05:57.240 --> 00:05:58.480
a kind of Ivy League,
90
00:05:58.540 --> 00:06:03.400
of course Ivy League is about Northeast American University and here you have
91
00:06:03.400 --> 00:06:07.320
some other universities. But the first one to join the list is Stanford,
92
00:06:08.400 --> 00:06:12.680
followed by Harvard, followed by Princeton, by Duke, and by M I t.
93
00:06:13.380 --> 00:06:16.600
So it's quite interesting because as you know,
94
00:06:16.980 --> 00:06:21.760
the American students have a lot of debt in their own bounties or the debt of
95
00:06:21.760 --> 00:06:26.760
the average American student is in fact used in order to finance the growth
96
00:06:26.900 --> 00:06:31.440
and the investment and the prosperity of large Chinese companies listed in
97
00:06:31.520 --> 00:06:36.480
Shanghai and or in jy in the other others you
98
00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:39.480
have also quite interesting names such as the Mayo Clinic,
99
00:06:40.070 --> 00:06:44.920
very well known in Rochester, New York for the quality of its services.
100
00:06:45.180 --> 00:06:47.000
And you have the Bank of Taiwan,
101
00:06:47.370 --> 00:06:51.640
which is allowed to trade a Asias in Shanghai and Xang jy.
102
00:06:52.380 --> 00:06:56.080
Now let's go back to John Han and Nofo Spring. Mr.
103
00:06:56.500 --> 00:07:01.280
Han was born in 1954 when he is 12 years old
104
00:07:01.460 --> 00:07:05.680
in 1966. The cultural revolution starts in China,
105
00:07:06.090 --> 00:07:08.840
which is going to be an extremely dramatic event,
106
00:07:10.220 --> 00:07:12.360
is somewhere homeless,
107
00:07:12.820 --> 00:07:17.680
moving from one place to the other from the age of 12 to the age of 23.
108
00:07:18.030 --> 00:07:21.920
He's going to work in the construction industry as a mason,
109
00:07:22.220 --> 00:07:24.400
as a carpenter, and so on, so forth.
110
00:07:24.470 --> 00:07:27.280
This period was certainly a traumatic experience for Mr.
111
00:07:28.060 --> 00:07:32.720
Han and this is probably the reason why it is very much out
112
00:07:32.860 --> 00:07:34.400
of publicity,
113
00:07:35.170 --> 00:07:39.840
media TV and the Liqui Communist Party in China
114
00:07:39.930 --> 00:07:41.200
under ruling members.
115
00:07:42.080 --> 00:07:47.040
1977 is 23 years old and now the entrance in
116
00:07:47.040 --> 00:07:48.960
the university is allowed again.
117
00:07:49.550 --> 00:07:52.560
He's going to try and he's going to fail twice.
118
00:07:53.510 --> 00:07:56.280
He's going to be accepted in a community college,
119
00:07:56.290 --> 00:08:01.040
which is a kind of a technical school in order to get a job quite quickly
120
00:08:01.180 --> 00:08:04.280
and he is going to study communication, radio, tv, et cetera,
121
00:08:04.920 --> 00:08:07.080
becoming a journalist. He's being a journalist.
122
00:08:07.080 --> 00:08:12.080
During five years he's been able to observe businesses and he's going to
123
00:08:12.080 --> 00:08:16.360
get into business. He's going to start with a culture of mushroom.
124
00:08:16.540 --> 00:08:20.280
It seems that it was a kind of economic and financial disaster.
125
00:08:20.910 --> 00:08:24.440
Then he became member of the Wahaha community,
126
00:08:25.140 --> 00:08:27.200
Wahaha a company in the food industry,
127
00:08:27.200 --> 00:08:31.920
which is very well known for I would say questionable and dubious
128
00:08:32.360 --> 00:08:36.240
practices in business operations. But he's a number five in water,
129
00:08:36.340 --> 00:08:39.040
so he's going to be knowledgeable in this business.
130
00:08:39.310 --> 00:08:42.160
He's going to be part of the distribution in Hong Joh.
131
00:08:42.950 --> 00:08:47.880
Then he's going to move to kind of pharmacy producer of
132
00:08:48.360 --> 00:08:53.080
erectile dysfunction pills from turtle shell ball.
133
00:08:53.630 --> 00:08:56.240
It's going to be a very big commercial success,
134
00:08:56.340 --> 00:09:01.040
but there will be some issues with the authorities, the health authorities, uh,
135
00:09:01.060 --> 00:09:05.440
who are going to question the efficiency of the product as opposed to what is
136
00:09:05.600 --> 00:09:08.280
promised to the consumer. The big date,
137
00:09:08.480 --> 00:09:10.920
a big moment in his life is 1996.
138
00:09:11.070 --> 00:09:13.520
He's creating non full spring,
139
00:09:13.850 --> 00:09:18.200
which means a farmer's spring and he's going to operate very
140
00:09:18.250 --> 00:09:20.040
discreetly under the radar,
141
00:09:20.610 --> 00:09:25.560
quite different behavior from Jack Ma who is going to publicly give his
142
00:09:25.560 --> 00:09:30.400
opinion about how China is ruled by a number of people with some negative
143
00:09:30.400 --> 00:09:32.680
consequences. As you know now,
144
00:09:32.680 --> 00:09:37.000
it's going to be a fantastic commercial success because non fu springing is
145
00:09:37.390 --> 00:09:42.320
China's biggest selling bottle water company with
146
00:09:42.320 --> 00:09:47.120
12% of the market share and volume followed by a Chinese competitor with a
147
00:09:47.120 --> 00:09:49.840
little bit more than 10, et cetera, et cetera.
148
00:09:50.420 --> 00:09:55.240
Wahaha number five followed by big three international
149
00:09:55.260 --> 00:10:00.160
brands, Dan CocaCola, Dee and Slate, et cetera,
150
00:10:00.340 --> 00:10:02.120
et cetera. So it's very successful.
151
00:10:02.470 --> 00:10:06.480
Initially the success comes from the fact that it's spring water and not
152
00:10:07.040 --> 00:10:09.000
chemically purified water.
153
00:10:09.800 --> 00:10:14.080
A very interesting interview made by the Financial Times is
154
00:10:14.370 --> 00:10:16.600
disclosing what somebody says,
155
00:10:17.280 --> 00:10:19.400
I don't trust tap water.
156
00:10:19.650 --> 00:10:24.560
There is a very big security safety problem in the food and
157
00:10:24.560 --> 00:10:27.720
water in China, and so this gentleman says,
158
00:10:28.240 --> 00:10:31.960
I use half a bottle each and every day just for brushing teeth,
159
00:10:32.960 --> 00:10:37.400
a bottle for cooking for the kitchen, and four bottles for drinking.
160
00:10:38.180 --> 00:10:42.840
No tap water at all. I don't trust tap water. Now,
161
00:10:42.840 --> 00:10:47.440
what is characterizing the operations That non-food spray is very
162
00:10:47.870 --> 00:10:52.160
high performing industrial tool capacity production,
163
00:10:52.620 --> 00:10:54.120
supply chain distribution,
164
00:10:54.390 --> 00:10:58.960
extremely efficient and which is supporting a fantastic brand
165
00:10:59.240 --> 00:11:03.240
positioning nature health. It's natural on health,
166
00:11:03.290 --> 00:11:08.080
which is explained in the website of the company with statements like
167
00:11:08.410 --> 00:11:11.840
every drop of non full springing has its source.
168
00:11:12.300 --> 00:11:15.400
The closer to source, the better water we gain.
169
00:11:15.620 --> 00:11:18.840
You can see on the website fantastic marketing,
170
00:11:19.270 --> 00:11:21.360
very aggressive communication as well.
171
00:11:21.780 --> 00:11:25.920
In 2000 is going to launch a TV campaign
172
00:11:26.400 --> 00:11:28.920
demonstrating between quotes at spring,
173
00:11:28.920 --> 00:11:33.440
water is much better for planned growth and animal health
174
00:11:34.020 --> 00:11:38.240
and is going to very much criticize its competitors and there will be some
175
00:11:38.680 --> 00:11:42.360
difficulties with the competitors is going to be brought in front of the court
176
00:11:42.500 --> 00:11:46.520
and they will have to pay a fine for malicious competition,
177
00:11:47.180 --> 00:11:49.880
unfair disclosure and communication, et cetera.
178
00:11:50.700 --> 00:11:54.160
And at that time he's going to say, but you know, know it's normal business.
179
00:11:54.340 --> 00:11:59.240
The Pepsi Challenge was something quite interesting to observe. Uh,
180
00:11:59.300 --> 00:12:02.640
you film somebody in the street, you said to this person, Hey,
181
00:12:02.980 --> 00:12:06.760
do you drink coca or do you drink Pepsi? I'm a Coca fan.
182
00:12:06.880 --> 00:12:10.000
I will never change and so on. Okay, let's make a blind test.
183
00:12:10.000 --> 00:12:13.800
Do you prefer this one or this one? The person is testing the two and says,
184
00:12:14.280 --> 00:12:18.440
I prefer this one. Then you disclose this is Pepsi. Ah, what's a surprise?
185
00:12:18.540 --> 00:12:20.840
You produce sports at the TV and so on and so forth.
186
00:12:21.190 --> 00:12:26.040
What was not exactly explained that the Pepsi was very, very fresh,
187
00:12:26.470 --> 00:12:27.800
high and so on and so forth.
188
00:12:27.860 --> 00:12:32.560
The temperature was high outside and a Coke was not that
189
00:12:32.560 --> 00:12:33.220
fresh.
190
00:12:33.220 --> 00:12:38.120
So obviously people preferred Pepsi because it was much cooler than Coca,
191
00:12:38.680 --> 00:12:43.480
A bit unfair, but basically John Chan says, we're allowed to do that.
192
00:12:43.590 --> 00:12:47.840
It's normal business practice at the end of the day, it created a brand.
193
00:12:48.620 --> 00:12:53.080
The brand is based on three pillars. First, food security,
194
00:12:53.720 --> 00:12:56.240
a very, very big concern. Low price.
195
00:12:56.700 --> 00:13:00.840
Low price means that it's accessible to everybody and you are not concerned
196
00:13:00.840 --> 00:13:03.600
about using bottled water to brush your teeth.
197
00:13:04.900 --> 00:13:09.840
The last pillar is high production and distribution efficiency.
198
00:13:09.940 --> 00:13:11.640
The company is very good.
199
00:13:12.380 --> 00:13:15.960
Now a brand has a value as you know, each and every year.
200
00:13:15.960 --> 00:13:20.200
Inter brand produces a list of the 100 most valuable brands.
201
00:13:20.500 --> 00:13:22.160
No full springing is not part of the list,
202
00:13:22.940 --> 00:13:26.320
but the brand joined the list produced by K,
203
00:13:26.820 --> 00:13:28.720
the very well-known marketing firm,
204
00:13:29.660 --> 00:13:32.360
number one for K Apple
205
00:13:32.890 --> 00:13:36.560
$880 billion, absolutely fantastic.
206
00:13:37.150 --> 00:13:39.960
Then you have the brands by category of business.
207
00:13:40.220 --> 00:13:42.600
One category is food and beverage.
208
00:13:42.860 --> 00:13:46.760
Number one is CocaCola for the food and beverage with
209
00:13:46.760 --> 00:13:48.280
$106 billion,
210
00:13:48.930 --> 00:13:53.800
which puts CocaCola at the 10th rank in the total list and
211
00:13:54.060 --> 00:13:58.800
FU spraying is number A one in the list with $22 billion,
212
00:13:59.410 --> 00:14:03.400
which is about one third of the market value of the company.
213
00:14:03.940 --> 00:14:08.720
Now let me say again that non spray is a real economic and financial
214
00:14:08.720 --> 00:14:12.600
success, economic success, commercial success. First,
215
00:14:12.700 --> 00:14:15.320
if you look at the evolution of revenues over the last five years,
216
00:14:15.820 --> 00:14:20.280
the company doubled its revenues from about 17 billion revenue
217
00:14:21.300 --> 00:14:26.120
to 33, 30 4 billion. If you exclude 2020,
218
00:14:26.130 --> 00:14:29.640
which is a very specific year because of the pandemic,
219
00:14:30.260 --> 00:14:33.200
the annual growth is about 15% on the average.
220
00:14:33.270 --> 00:14:36.600
Sometimes it's a bit more recovery in 2021.
221
00:14:37.100 --> 00:14:39.520
So you have a huge potential for growth.
222
00:14:40.060 --> 00:14:43.040
The company is operating four different segments,
223
00:14:43.220 --> 00:14:47.840
but by far the largest one is water products. Number two,
224
00:14:48.560 --> 00:14:53.440
interestingly is ready to drink tea products and if you look at the
225
00:14:53.440 --> 00:14:56.600
evolution, this is a green line on the graph,
226
00:14:57.220 --> 00:14:59.960
you see that it's up and significantly up.
227
00:15:00.340 --> 00:15:04.480
For the others it's still quite marginal, but it's growing as well.
228
00:15:05.120 --> 00:15:05.820
Historically,
229
00:15:05.820 --> 00:15:10.760
the water products we representing 60% of the total revenues the
230
00:15:10.760 --> 00:15:14.600
last two years it's a bit down and H 1 20 23,
231
00:15:15.040 --> 00:15:19.640
I will tell you a little bit later it's about 15% of the revenues quite big.
232
00:15:19.940 --> 00:15:24.840
But if you look at the evolution of the relative percentage of T
233
00:15:24.840 --> 00:15:29.480
product is getting up and up 20% at the end of 2022,
234
00:15:29.670 --> 00:15:34.000
more than 25% first semester, 2023.
235
00:15:34.430 --> 00:15:38.160
Operating costs as a percentage to revenues are quite stable.
236
00:15:38.990 --> 00:15:43.480
Cost of sales from 40 to 45 depending more or less on energy cost.
237
00:15:43.860 --> 00:15:47.760
If you look at selling distribution expenses, it's about 25%.
238
00:15:48.440 --> 00:15:50.880
A little bit of economies of scale but extremely marginal,
239
00:15:50.970 --> 00:15:54.040
quite stable general and administrative expenses,
240
00:15:54.470 --> 00:15:59.200
5% straight though it looks like very predictable
241
00:15:59.260 --> 00:16:03.560
in terms of cost structure. At BM a day with 40,
242
00:16:03.560 --> 00:16:08.400
45% cost sales and five plus 25 OPAC
243
00:16:08.520 --> 00:16:11.160
indirect cost, the EBIT dies quite high.
244
00:16:11.750 --> 00:16:16.560
EBIT D is before the precision of the authorization and represents 30%
245
00:16:16.580 --> 00:16:21.520
to revenues for the juice beverage products which are vitamin product for
246
00:16:21.860 --> 00:16:26.800
people who are practicing sport and it is more than 40% for the other three
247
00:16:26.800 --> 00:16:31.480
segments. Tea and water is more than 40% ebitda,
248
00:16:31.570 --> 00:16:34.880
which is absolutely huge in terms of commercial profitability.
249
00:16:35.380 --> 00:16:39.560
So at the end of the day, the camp is EBITDA was 30% five years ago,
250
00:16:39.560 --> 00:16:44.360
it's now about 40%. In the meantime, the company double its revenues,
251
00:16:44.460 --> 00:16:47.960
so it's not growth at the expense of commercial profitability,
252
00:16:48.390 --> 00:16:52.160
it's growth and commercial profitability in parallel.
253
00:16:53.150 --> 00:16:56.680
This is about the ebitda. If you look at the ebit,
254
00:16:57.310 --> 00:17:00.280
that is the difference. That is the precision and multi.
255
00:17:00.670 --> 00:17:04.680
This is a consequence of investing in capacity and so and so forth.
256
00:17:05.070 --> 00:17:09.200
It's about eight to 10% of revenues depending on,
257
00:17:09.460 --> 00:17:12.800
and so at the end of the day, 40% is ebitda,
258
00:17:13.020 --> 00:17:15.680
30% plus is ebit.
259
00:17:16.020 --> 00:17:19.880
So a company extremely profitable in terms of p and a.
260
00:17:20.060 --> 00:17:23.080
You have growth and you have commercial profitability,
261
00:17:23.820 --> 00:17:26.360
but you know that performance is not return on sales.
262
00:17:26.360 --> 00:17:28.760
Performance is return on capital,
263
00:17:29.210 --> 00:17:33.440
which takes into account the assets turnover, the productivity of the asset.
264
00:17:34.060 --> 00:17:38.320
The productivity of the asset is the ability of the company to transform, uh,
265
00:17:38.840 --> 00:17:39.920
tangible, intangible,
266
00:17:40.110 --> 00:17:44.040
non-current assets and working counter requirement into revenues.
267
00:17:44.690 --> 00:17:48.760
Let's have a look at investment property, plant and equipment.
268
00:17:48.820 --> 00:17:53.680
The company invest each and every year from 10 to 12% of its
269
00:17:53.680 --> 00:17:58.320
revenues, which is quite high and the company is naturally depreciating.
270
00:17:58.740 --> 00:18:02.160
Its fixed asset depreciation and monetization,
271
00:18:02.450 --> 00:18:04.560
eight 10% of revenues.
272
00:18:04.860 --> 00:18:08.960
But at the end of the day you add 12 and you deduct 10.
273
00:18:09.140 --> 00:18:14.080
So property, plant and equipment is moving up but not that quickly.
274
00:18:14.540 --> 00:18:15.373
In the meantime,
275
00:18:16.060 --> 00:18:20.680
the company is perfectly managing its operations so that the cash conversion
276
00:18:20.690 --> 00:18:23.040
cycle is strongly negative.
277
00:18:23.040 --> 00:18:25.520
And here you have something very interesting to observe.
278
00:18:25.740 --> 00:18:28.400
Of course a company has inventories, it's normal.
279
00:18:28.940 --> 00:18:32.440
Of course a company is paying its suppliers with a delayed accounts people,
280
00:18:32.740 --> 00:18:34.880
but if you look at the accounts receivable,
281
00:18:35.020 --> 00:18:40.000
it represents five days of sales. So the wholesalers,
282
00:18:40.100 --> 00:18:43.160
the distributors of any kind, they pay very quickly.
283
00:18:43.630 --> 00:18:45.160
It's even better than that.
284
00:18:45.230 --> 00:18:50.200
They pay in advance and the company has a strong link with its distributors.
285
00:18:50.820 --> 00:18:54.640
But the consequence of this link and this contractual partnership with the
286
00:18:54.800 --> 00:18:58.680
distributors is that they pay advances. You receive advances from the customer.
287
00:18:58.820 --> 00:19:02.920
So at the end of the day, the cash conversion cycle is quite negative,
288
00:19:03.850 --> 00:19:08.160
which is a curiosity for a company which is not in distribution but which is in
289
00:19:08.170 --> 00:19:09.920
production. General speaking,
290
00:19:09.940 --> 00:19:14.640
the working capital requirement is negative for retail and positive for
291
00:19:14.960 --> 00:19:15.880
producers here,
292
00:19:16.260 --> 00:19:20.520
the working capital requirement is strongly negative and is producing
293
00:19:21.110 --> 00:19:24.320
some cash resources. So interestingly,
294
00:19:24.320 --> 00:19:28.880
when the capital is growing at 15% and when the cash
295
00:19:28.880 --> 00:19:32.920
conversion cycle represents minus 20 days of sales,
296
00:19:33.750 --> 00:19:38.360
it's like if the working capital requirement is producing cash,
297
00:19:38.870 --> 00:19:42.280
15% of 20, which is three days of revenues,
298
00:19:42.420 --> 00:19:44.440
of additional cash each and every year,
299
00:19:44.530 --> 00:19:49.080
which contributes to the financing of the property plant and equipment which is
300
00:19:49.080 --> 00:19:53.520
not growing at the speed of light. So at the end of the day,
301
00:19:53.780 --> 00:19:57.120
the relationships with the distributors are absolutely phenomenal.
302
00:19:58.150 --> 00:20:02.240
They have strong links and they have kind of win-win partnership with revenue
303
00:20:02.350 --> 00:20:05.800
sharing practices of course, but at the end of the day,
304
00:20:06.060 --> 00:20:10.360
the company is receiving for 2.7 billion revenues advances
305
00:20:11.140 --> 00:20:14.640
and the company also shows operating liabilities in the penalty,
306
00:20:15.160 --> 00:20:17.240
discounts on rebate due to customers,
307
00:20:17.280 --> 00:20:21.400
an additional 1.1 billion and as a company is investing a lot,
308
00:20:21.420 --> 00:20:25.040
but paying with a delay payables on investment
309
00:20:25.500 --> 00:20:29.720
1.5 billion, the working character is extremely negative,
310
00:20:29.810 --> 00:20:32.840
which contributes to the financing. Now the consequence,
311
00:20:32.840 --> 00:20:37.600
the assets turnover is quite high. It's even better than high. It's improving.
312
00:20:38.550 --> 00:20:41.600
Five years ago the assets turnover was 2.5.
313
00:20:41.930 --> 00:20:43.600
Today it's about 4.5.
314
00:20:44.150 --> 00:20:47.390
Then return capital is return on sales times assets done over.
315
00:20:47.390 --> 00:20:49.080
When you multiply 30%,
316
00:20:49.490 --> 00:20:53.360
which is a very nice p and l by 4.5,
317
00:20:53.570 --> 00:20:55.600
which is a very nice balance aid,
318
00:20:55.980 --> 00:21:00.480
you get a return capital employed of 135%,
319
00:21:00.650 --> 00:21:04.120
which is absolutely outstanding. On financial point of view,
320
00:21:05.220 --> 00:21:09.640
of course there is a kind of correlation between performance return capital and
321
00:21:09.640 --> 00:21:13.160
value creation because performance is what creates value.
322
00:21:14.020 --> 00:21:18.000
But if you look at the market to book of the company during the last three years
323
00:21:18.260 --> 00:21:22.000
of listing 20 to 22, it's more than 60,
324
00:21:23.370 --> 00:21:27.760
which basically means that one MIB invested in business operations had a value,
325
00:21:27.760 --> 00:21:30.000
which is more than 60 MIB is today.
326
00:21:30.510 --> 00:21:34.200
This fantastic value creation seems to be quite correlated with their
327
00:21:34.270 --> 00:21:39.000
outstanding financial performance. But when you evaluate a company,
328
00:21:39.530 --> 00:21:43.560
there is performance in it because performance is what is creating value,
329
00:21:43.860 --> 00:21:48.560
but growth is boosting and accelerating performance to create value.
330
00:21:48.940 --> 00:21:53.760
So it's interesting to calculate the growth which is consistent with that
331
00:21:53.810 --> 00:21:55.960
value and the performance of the company.
332
00:21:56.700 --> 00:22:01.640
You can calculate the kind of theoretical market to book as if there was no
333
00:22:01.640 --> 00:22:04.720
growth in the free cash flows, revenues had been done whatsoever.
334
00:22:05.030 --> 00:22:09.600
Then you compare this market to book without growth with the actual market to
335
00:22:09.600 --> 00:22:11.520
book. And the intensity,
336
00:22:11.900 --> 00:22:16.640
if I may say of the gap gives you a kind of idea about the level of growth which
337
00:22:16.640 --> 00:22:20.640
is anticipated by financial investors. At the end of the time,
338
00:22:21.180 --> 00:22:24.680
the market to book without any growth should be 20.
339
00:22:25.460 --> 00:22:30.440
The actual market to book is more than 60. Then you understand that the market,
340
00:22:30.620 --> 00:22:34.920
the financial investors are anticipating a huge growth potential in
341
00:22:35.360 --> 00:22:38.320
revenues, in profits and in cash labs.
342
00:22:39.020 --> 00:22:43.680
Now it's very interesting to observe that the growth which you need during the
343
00:22:43.680 --> 00:22:48.360
next 10 years is 14% for the free cash
344
00:22:48.370 --> 00:22:52.280
flows each and every year, 14% during 10 years.
345
00:22:52.500 --> 00:22:56.440
That's quite big and it raises two phenomenal questions.
346
00:22:57.180 --> 00:22:58.000
The first one is,
347
00:22:58.000 --> 00:23:03.000
does a company have the growth drivers to keep on growing at the
348
00:23:03.000 --> 00:23:05.320
same rate? You remember it was about 15%.
349
00:23:05.900 --> 00:23:09.280
The second question is also quite interesting. When you grow,
350
00:23:09.500 --> 00:23:13.320
you consume financial resources, you need financial resources.
351
00:23:13.510 --> 00:23:16.960
Will a company be able to finance its growth?
352
00:23:17.780 --> 00:23:21.000
You remember what is at stake is the dilution of the owner.
353
00:23:21.730 --> 00:23:23.440
Let's first have a look at growth drivers.
354
00:23:24.180 --> 00:23:28.760
Of course in 2020 the business is a bit stable. 2022,
355
00:23:28.870 --> 00:23:33.080
it's a bit up and 2023, first semester, 23%.
356
00:23:33.980 --> 00:23:35.840
Wow. In the meantime, in China,
357
00:23:36.400 --> 00:23:39.120
G D P is growing at a level of 5.5%.
358
00:23:39.430 --> 00:23:42.880
Household consumption is uh, by 8.2%,
359
00:23:43.180 --> 00:23:47.200
and if you look at the different segments, water is 12%. Ah,
360
00:23:47.200 --> 00:23:50.520
12 is not 14 or 15 or whatsoever. Yes,
361
00:23:51.020 --> 00:23:55.920
but tea products are uh by 60% and the others juice
362
00:23:56.280 --> 00:23:58.840
beverages and so on and so forth. 20 to 30%.
363
00:23:58.940 --> 00:24:03.760
So you have the gross drivers and the first one is tea,
364
00:24:04.010 --> 00:24:05.640
ready to drink tea product.
365
00:24:06.970 --> 00:24:09.320
Let's have a look now at gross financing.
366
00:24:09.970 --> 00:24:13.760
Gross consumes financial resources. This is absolutely obvious why?
367
00:24:13.790 --> 00:24:17.480
Because the day you grow, you have to increase your production capacity,
368
00:24:17.480 --> 00:24:21.200
your manufacturing footprint, you remember 10 to 12%.
369
00:24:22.220 --> 00:24:25.560
You have also to take into account the working capital requirement. Ah,
370
00:24:25.710 --> 00:24:26.390
good news,
371
00:24:26.390 --> 00:24:30.920
it's strongly negatives and gross is producing cash and not consuming cash.
372
00:24:31.340 --> 00:24:36.320
The question is, is it durable? Is it enduring? Is it stable in the long term?
373
00:24:36.590 --> 00:24:41.280
That might be a question and the day you want to promote an increase
374
00:24:41.460 --> 00:24:45.880
growth rate of the other product, you have to invest in marketing, in promotion,
375
00:24:45.900 --> 00:24:49.240
in innovation and so on, so forth. So the question is,
376
00:24:49.620 --> 00:24:53.400
is your p and l going to be as stable as anticipated?
377
00:24:54.140 --> 00:24:54.820
Now in finance,
378
00:24:54.820 --> 00:24:59.360
we have a nice concept to explain the ability of the company to grow and to sell
379
00:24:59.400 --> 00:25:02.560
finances. Growth is name sustainable growth.
380
00:25:03.770 --> 00:25:05.200
Let's go back to this concept.
381
00:25:06.100 --> 00:25:10.840
The very big question is does a company have a capacity to finance his growth?
382
00:25:11.340 --> 00:25:15.000
Of course, you can't find on your growth. You raise debt, you raise equity,
383
00:25:15.180 --> 00:25:17.000
you issue shares and so on so forth.
384
00:25:17.300 --> 00:25:22.040
But the question is you want to finance your growth without diluting your
385
00:25:22.040 --> 00:25:22.700
shareholders.
386
00:25:22.700 --> 00:25:27.560
You remember that John Chan holds 84% of non
387
00:25:27.560 --> 00:25:29.840
full springing and he wants to keep the control.
388
00:25:30.620 --> 00:25:33.560
So you try to finance your growth without suing shares.
389
00:25:33.660 --> 00:25:36.680
And then if you don't want to dilute your shareholders,
390
00:25:36.710 --> 00:25:40.560
your profit should be high because if you don't want to deteriorate your
391
00:25:40.560 --> 00:25:42.520
financial structure increasing debt,
392
00:25:42.740 --> 00:25:46.200
and if you want to keep debt over equity quite constant,
393
00:25:46.750 --> 00:25:50.640
then you need to generate plenty of profit or you can increase debt,
394
00:25:51.060 --> 00:25:55.360
but then you increase very much a financial risk and you put a company in a very
395
00:25:55.720 --> 00:25:56.553
dangerous situation.
396
00:25:56.820 --> 00:26:01.200
The three words which are quite important is you want to finance
397
00:26:01.540 --> 00:26:05.480
growth and you want to kind of self-financing.
398
00:26:05.620 --> 00:26:10.280
It should come from inside this equity increase so that you can keep
399
00:26:10.470 --> 00:26:15.280
your financial independence and you're not forced to issue shares each
400
00:26:15.280 --> 00:26:20.000
and every day. The definition, technical definition of sustainable growth,
401
00:26:20.100 --> 00:26:25.040
it is a maximum growth rate of capital employment that the
402
00:26:25.040 --> 00:26:28.680
company can assume and sustain without issuing shares,
403
00:26:28.680 --> 00:26:32.320
again dilution and without increasing the debt ratio,
404
00:26:32.320 --> 00:26:37.040
without increasing the gearing debt divided by equity. Now,
405
00:26:37.040 --> 00:26:39.320
in this definition, there are two phenomenal points.
406
00:26:39.830 --> 00:26:41.520
It's not gross in the revenues,
407
00:26:42.020 --> 00:26:46.400
in the growth of the capital employed for a very simple reason.
408
00:26:46.940 --> 00:26:51.440
You remember that shareholders and bankers, they don't finance the revenues.
409
00:26:51.830 --> 00:26:56.280
They finance industrial operations thanks to which you can produce and generate
410
00:26:56.360 --> 00:27:00.920
revenues though basically the what is at stake is a growth in
411
00:27:01.220 --> 00:27:04.400
is how much we invest in the development of your capital employee,
412
00:27:05.330 --> 00:27:06.600
which has a consequence,
413
00:27:06.600 --> 00:27:11.440
which is you can produce and you generate more revenues. This is first point.
414
00:27:11.440 --> 00:27:15.040
The second point is it's about internal financing.
415
00:27:15.460 --> 00:27:17.680
If it's about internal financing for equity,
416
00:27:17.980 --> 00:27:22.120
it means that it's about profitability and functional performance.
417
00:27:22.700 --> 00:27:25.840
How do you calculate the sustainable growth rate? Ah,
418
00:27:26.180 --> 00:27:29.480
you want to increase your equity. You have two ways to increase your equity.
419
00:27:29.860 --> 00:27:33.360
You can increase your retain earnings or you can issue shares capital increase.
420
00:27:33.380 --> 00:27:35.760
No, it should be zero. We don't want to issue shares.
421
00:27:35.760 --> 00:27:40.280
So the increase in equity is limited to increasing retain earnings,
422
00:27:40.690 --> 00:27:44.800
which is about an net earnings of the year minus dividends which are returned
423
00:27:44.800 --> 00:27:45.760
back to shareholders.
424
00:27:47.270 --> 00:27:51.200
Very important ratio which characterizes the dividend policy of the company
425
00:27:51.760 --> 00:27:52.600
dividend pout,
426
00:27:52.820 --> 00:27:57.360
the rate of distribution D is dividend divided by an net earnings.
427
00:27:57.360 --> 00:28:00.920
Which percentage of your net earnings you return to shareholders.
428
00:28:01.900 --> 00:28:04.880
So the increase in retail earnings is net earnings,
429
00:28:05.760 --> 00:28:09.920
earnings after taxes minus D multiplied by earnings after taxes,
430
00:28:10.020 --> 00:28:14.800
so it's earnings after taxes multiplied by open the bracket one minus D
431
00:28:15.050 --> 00:28:15.960
close bracket.
432
00:28:17.430 --> 00:28:22.400
Then the equity growth rate is the equity increase
433
00:28:22.470 --> 00:28:27.320
divided by the equity. So it's increase in return earnings divided by equity,
434
00:28:27.390 --> 00:28:32.360
it's earnings after tax multiplied by one minus D divided by equity,
435
00:28:33.340 --> 00:28:37.680
no problem. But earning such tax divided by equity is very well known.
436
00:28:38.390 --> 00:28:43.080
It's how much you earn as a shareholder divided by how much you invested as a
437
00:28:43.080 --> 00:28:45.400
shareholder. It's a return on shareholders' investment.
438
00:28:45.710 --> 00:28:48.800
It's a financial profitability, it's a return on equity.
439
00:28:49.700 --> 00:28:54.320
So you understand that the internal growth of equity without pursuing shares
440
00:28:54.320 --> 00:28:59.040
again is return equity multiplied by one minus dividend payout
441
00:28:59.090 --> 00:29:02.720
ratio. If you want to keep a stable financial structure,
442
00:29:03.510 --> 00:29:08.400
debt should grow at the same rate as equity. Then debt over equity is constant,
443
00:29:09.180 --> 00:29:12.160
but if debt is growing at the same rate as equity,
444
00:29:12.460 --> 00:29:15.760
you understand that capital employee should grow at the same rate.
445
00:29:15.910 --> 00:29:20.360
Otherwise you have an issue in the gross financing. So the self-finance,
446
00:29:20.380 --> 00:29:25.160
the sustainable growth rate is named G S and it's
447
00:29:25.160 --> 00:29:29.600
return equity multiplied by one minus dividend power ratio.
448
00:29:30.490 --> 00:29:32.520
Let's calculate it for non footprint.
449
00:29:33.020 --> 00:29:37.440
And then you have to observe the dividend policy of the company. Interestingly,
450
00:29:37.500 --> 00:29:41.760
the company before it's listed was distributing a fantastic dividend.
451
00:29:42.340 --> 00:29:46.160
It was distributing more than 150% of the earnings of the year.
452
00:29:46.580 --> 00:29:50.440
So you take dividend divided by the earnings of the year and you get something
453
00:29:50.440 --> 00:29:54.720
which is very high stabilization in 21, 22,
454
00:29:55.370 --> 00:29:59.840
about 50%. But the company says, we make no commitment,
455
00:29:59.980 --> 00:30:03.760
we provide no commitment on the distribution policy of the company.
456
00:30:04.450 --> 00:30:06.880
There will be a can of commitment,
457
00:30:06.880 --> 00:30:09.640
which is the ability to sell financial growth.
458
00:30:10.460 --> 00:30:12.440
And then if you calculate the return equity,
459
00:30:12.460 --> 00:30:16.400
you get something like 35 40% and
460
00:30:16.400 --> 00:30:20.720
35% minus 50% gives you a very nice
461
00:30:20.870 --> 00:30:25.520
sustainable growth rate. It was a bit more than 20% in 2021.
462
00:30:25.980 --> 00:30:29.440
It is a bit less than 20% in 2022.
463
00:30:29.620 --> 00:30:33.040
But then you have to compare the sustainable growth rate,
464
00:30:33.040 --> 00:30:36.240
which is the ability of the company to sell finances,
465
00:30:36.240 --> 00:30:40.240
growth with the actual capital employee growth and the capital employed for the
466
00:30:40.240 --> 00:30:44.760
reasons which I gave you before, increasing property, plant and equipment.
467
00:30:45.020 --> 00:30:45.610
But uh,
468
00:30:45.610 --> 00:30:50.440
investment minus the precision and negative working capital requirement
469
00:30:50.620 --> 00:30:54.160
and cash conversion cycle. The capital employees almost stable,
470
00:30:54.210 --> 00:30:59.160
which is quite outstanding for a company which is growing its revenues by
471
00:30:59.160 --> 00:30:59.993
15%.
472
00:31:00.500 --> 00:31:05.080
So you have stable capital employee growth and you have a strong ability to grow
473
00:31:05.420 --> 00:31:08.080
at the end of the day, no problem in the financing.
474
00:31:09.020 --> 00:31:12.240
No problem in the financing and the company can't distribute a lot of dividend.
475
00:31:12.340 --> 00:31:15.040
Why? Because it's cash rich.
476
00:31:15.750 --> 00:31:18.840
Cash by far exceeds debt in the balancing.
477
00:31:19.180 --> 00:31:20.840
The gearing is negative.
478
00:31:21.070 --> 00:31:25.800
Debt over equity debt is about minus 70% of equity.
479
00:31:26.100 --> 00:31:30.160
The leverage debt divided by EBITDA is strongly negative.
480
00:31:31.140 --> 00:31:34.560
In fact, cash represents one year Fitbit done to make it simple.
481
00:31:35.020 --> 00:31:36.000
So at the end of the day,
482
00:31:36.000 --> 00:31:40.720
you have a company whose financial structure is extremely robust,
483
00:31:41.330 --> 00:31:43.880
whose ability to grow is very high,
484
00:31:44.780 --> 00:31:48.280
and with growth in the capital employees quite controlled.
485
00:31:49.490 --> 00:31:53.320
Which information do we get from the first half? 2023 growth?
486
00:31:53.500 --> 00:31:57.560
23% net income plus 25%,
487
00:31:58.140 --> 00:32:02.440
and the company announces that they are going to pay a dividend of 7.6 billion
488
00:32:02.550 --> 00:32:06.920
rent. Maybe if you look at the earnings of last year,
489
00:32:06.990 --> 00:32:07.840
general speaking,
490
00:32:07.840 --> 00:32:11.440
the dividend of this year is a consequence of the dividend of last year.
491
00:32:11.620 --> 00:32:15.840
It represents about 60% of the earnings after tax of 2022.
492
00:32:16.690 --> 00:32:19.160
Let's apply the ratio to the return equity,
493
00:32:19.260 --> 00:32:23.560
35% but applied by one minus D one minus 60%,
494
00:32:23.770 --> 00:32:27.080
40% of 35% is 14%.
495
00:32:27.270 --> 00:32:31.280
This is a sustainable growth rate and you remember that the value of the company
496
00:32:31.420 --> 00:32:33.880
is justified by an annual increase,
497
00:32:34.020 --> 00:32:38.400
an annual increase in the free cash flow of 14%. Same figure,
498
00:32:39.010 --> 00:32:39.880
quite harmony.
499
00:32:40.700 --> 00:32:45.640
The challenges which are going to be met by the company in the futures are first
500
00:32:45.850 --> 00:32:50.160
commercial challenges per you growth in a T
501
00:32:50.660 --> 00:32:53.800
in order of course and others and so on and so forth.
502
00:32:53.940 --> 00:32:57.000
You have to keep on growing your revenues.
503
00:32:57.460 --> 00:33:00.800
You can read some marketing comments and statements,
504
00:33:00.860 --> 00:33:03.760
say that the company should premiumize its water,
505
00:33:04.200 --> 00:33:08.080
increase the prices to make it simple luxury things and so on so forth.
506
00:33:08.740 --> 00:33:13.640
I'm not quite sure that it'll not have a depositioning consequence on
507
00:33:13.640 --> 00:33:16.680
the brand. In addition to the commercial challenges,
508
00:33:16.690 --> 00:33:21.080
there will be a financial challenge the company wants to keep on investing in
509
00:33:21.080 --> 00:33:23.320
it. Growth free cash load.
510
00:33:23.830 --> 00:33:26.280
What about the evolution of the working capital requirement?
511
00:33:26.390 --> 00:33:30.640
Investing in capacity manufacturing footprint and operating expenses.
512
00:33:30.640 --> 00:33:31.880
Because if you want to grow,
513
00:33:31.910 --> 00:33:36.680
sometimes you have to invest in marketing development expenses,
514
00:33:36.980 --> 00:33:41.760
but in my opinion, there will be also a third category of challenges,
515
00:33:41.760 --> 00:33:44.120
which is quite big. Societal challenges.
516
00:33:44.860 --> 00:33:48.360
The company was working under the radar. Nobody knows you,
517
00:33:48.360 --> 00:33:51.160
you can do whatever you like, no consequence,
518
00:33:51.820 --> 00:33:56.320
and nobody is looking at observing and criticizing what you do.
519
00:33:56.540 --> 00:33:58.280
Now the company is visible.
520
00:33:59.230 --> 00:34:03.720
Everybody in China was caught by a surprise understanding that the number one,
521
00:34:03.780 --> 00:34:07.120
the richest person in China now is producing mineral water.
522
00:34:07.900 --> 00:34:12.720
Now they are very interesting statements on social networks saying for
523
00:34:12.720 --> 00:34:13.320
example, oh,
524
00:34:13.320 --> 00:34:18.200
you produce Jewish beverage on peaches and the peaches come from
525
00:34:18.590 --> 00:34:19.960
Fukushima. Ah, okay,
526
00:34:20.180 --> 00:34:25.040
so maybe there is a problem somewhere because you heard about nuclear accident
527
00:34:25.100 --> 00:34:28.600
on Fukushima. Is there any consequence? Nobody knows,
528
00:34:28.600 --> 00:34:31.680
but everybody's criticizing on that statement.
529
00:34:32.030 --> 00:34:34.560
When you produce and sell some mineral water,
530
00:34:34.820 --> 00:34:39.520
you sell it in bottles poly ET to after that
531
00:34:40.200 --> 00:34:43.840
b e t. That's something which comes from carbon.
532
00:34:44.390 --> 00:34:47.040
It's something which comes from oil products.
533
00:34:47.040 --> 00:34:52.000
It's about chemical product and there will be some pollution here and
534
00:34:52.000 --> 00:34:54.160
there because you have to store, because et cetera,
535
00:34:54.160 --> 00:34:58.320
because you have to produce some scope three upstream
536
00:34:58.880 --> 00:35:01.840
purchases, uh, about your, about your production,
537
00:35:01.840 --> 00:35:04.800
and the company communicates very much on scope one, scope two,
538
00:35:04.900 --> 00:35:08.600
not very much on scope three downstream, no problem.
539
00:35:08.660 --> 00:35:13.640
You drink the water upstream problem because you have to produce the bottles and
540
00:35:13.640 --> 00:35:14.920
there will be major,
541
00:35:15.210 --> 00:35:20.200
major challenges and this is why the question is if you are so
542
00:35:20.210 --> 00:35:23.920
profitable, if you can't distribute a dividend in 2020,
543
00:35:24.010 --> 00:35:25.240
which is uh,
544
00:35:25.410 --> 00:35:29.360
about what you raised from the capital market without deteriorating the bounty,
545
00:35:30.020 --> 00:35:33.760
why list the company now? He's no more under the radar.
546
00:35:34.180 --> 00:35:36.960
He is in front of the screen. Everybody's observing.
547
00:35:37.540 --> 00:35:42.040
That's an additional challenge for the company. Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome in this film, which contrary to what its title suggests, is not dedicated to alchemy or the transmutation of materials of any kind, but to known full spring a Chinese company that made the fortune of its founder and owner.
You could imagine that the richest person in China comes from the tech universe, which is creating petty of billionaires around the world.
Not exactly the richest person is a leader in mineral water, which is not exactly what you would qualify as an high tech business.
Of course there's a difference between the wealth of an individual and the value of the company.
If you look at the market capitalization in China, tech versus water number one, 10 cent, c e o, pan Ma, very well known, $400 billion Alibaba, Jack Ma, $240 billion and long full springing only $64 billion.
But John Han whose nickname is the lone wolf, somebody who is quite discreet holds 84%.
So what is very interesting is that known for spring is a fantastic economic and financial success, quite discreet under the radar, but this success has been generated by the company without diluting the founder, owner of the company, which is basically the subject of this film.
If we go back to the valuation of known food springing, the company is private until September, 2020, i p o on the Hong Kong stock exchange, Hong Kong means H shares.
I will elaborate a little bit later on about A versus H shares.
The offered price is 21.5 Hong Kong dollars.
The closing price, the first day of the listing is $35.
Now the company issuing almost 400 million shares, which represents only 3.5% of the total number of shares outstanding.
The company is going to raise 8.5 billion Hong Kong dollars, which represents a little bit more than $1 billion.
But interestingly, the same year in 2020, the company's going to distribute a dividend of 8 billion Hong Kong dollars.
It's as if the money which comes from the shares issue is distributed.
The shareholders in 2019, the year before the dividend represented $9.6 billion.
Though you can conclude that at the end of the day the company on a financial point of view did not need the I P O.
What happened after the I P O first, there was a fantastic increase in stock price completely correlated from the market.
The Hong is a little bit up, the non full springing stock price is skyrocketing then back to reality and what is very interesting, if you look at the last month, non food springing stock price is quite stable.
Boring I would say when the Hong Index is down from the very beginning to the end of this period, if you look at non food break stock prices plus 20% plus 22 exactly, plus the dividend you have to add if you want to calculate the total shareholders return.
In the meantime, the Hong Index is down by 25%.
So at the end the day it's quite a good story for the non-food spring shareholders, today's stock price is 44 Hong Kong dollars, which represents a capitalization of 500 billion Hong Kong dollars and Mr.
Han owes 84% of that, but that not all.
He's also the controlling interest of a company in the pharma business whose name is Beijing Onetime biological pharmacy.
He owes 75%.
He seems that Mr.
Han enjoys very much keeping the control of the assets plus some other various mission assets.
At the end of the day is total waste is evaluated at $62.4 billion according to Forbes, number one in China, number 20 worldwide.
So he's a very, very wealthy, successful person.
A few words about A versus H shares A means that the company is listed on the Shanghai or Xang Zhen stock market and a means that these shares are reserved to mainland citizens, Chinese citizens, and to some other investors which are named qualified investors.
H means Hong Kong stock exchange, it's quite free in terms of access A is very restricted.
Now the qualified foreign institutional investors is a very restrictive club of foreign investors who are allowed to buy and sell and trade Asia shares in Shanghai.
In Shanghai, interestingly, I visited the China Securities Regulatory Commission website, which gives a list of these very selective club.
It's a selective club with more than 550 members in which you can find the large international banks.
The first one to join the list in 2003 is U B s, but followed by Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, all the large banks are there, obviously asset managers because it's about trading stocks.
The first to join the list is a Japanese company, no Secur is followed by BlackRock, MDI and so on so forth.
But if you look at the list, there are some interesting names in the others, a kind of Ivy League, of course Ivy League is about Northeast American University and here you have some other universities.
But the first one to join the list is Stanford, followed by Harvard, followed by Princeton, by Duke, and by M I t.
So it's quite interesting because as you know, the American students have a lot of debt in their own bounties or the debt of the average American student is in fact used in order to finance the growth and the investment and the prosperity of large Chinese companies listed in Shanghai and or in jy in the other others you have also quite interesting names such as the Mayo Clinic, very well known in Rochester, New York for the quality of its services.
And you have the Bank of Taiwan, which is allowed to trade a Asias in Shanghai and Xang jy.
Now let's go back to John Han and Nofo Spring.
Mr.
Han was born in 1954 when he is 12 years old in 1966.
The cultural revolution starts in China, which is going to be an extremely dramatic event, is somewhere homeless, moving from one place to the other from the age of 12 to the age of 23.
He's going to work in the construction industry as a mason, as a carpenter, and so on, so forth.
This period was certainly a traumatic experience for Mr.
Han and this is probably the reason why it is very much out of publicity, media TV and the Liqui Communist Party in China under ruling members.
1977 is 23 years old and now the entrance in the university is allowed again.
He's going to try and he's going to fail twice.
He's going to be accepted in a community college, which is a kind of a technical school in order to get a job quite quickly and he is going to study communication, radio, tv, et cetera, becoming a journalist.
He's being a journalist.
During five years he's been able to observe businesses and he's going to get into business.
He's going to start with a culture of mushroom.
It seems that it was a kind of economic and financial disaster.
Then he became member of the Wahaha community, Wahaha a company in the food industry, which is very well known for I would say questionable and dubious practices in business operations.
But he's a number five in water, so he's going to be knowledgeable in this business.
He's going to be part of the distribution in Hong Joh.
Then he's going to move to kind of pharmacy producer of erectile dysfunction pills from turtle shell ball.
It's going to be a very big commercial success, but there will be some issues with the authorities, the health authorities, uh, who are going to question the efficiency of the product as opposed to what is promised to the consumer.
The big date, a big moment in his life is 1996.
He's creating non full spring, which means a farmer's spring and he's going to operate very discreetly under the radar, quite different behavior from Jack Ma who is going to publicly give his opinion about how China is ruled by a number of people with some negative consequences.
As you know now, it's going to be a fantastic commercial success because non fu springing is China's biggest selling bottle water company with 12% of the market share and volume followed by a Chinese competitor with a little bit more than 10, et cetera, et cetera.
Wahaha number five followed by big three international brands, Dan CocaCola, Dee and Slate, et cetera, et cetera.
So it's very successful.
Initially the success comes from the fact that it's spring water and not chemically purified water.
A very interesting interview made by the Financial Times is disclosing what somebody says, I don't trust tap water.
There is a very big security safety problem in the food and water in China, and so this gentleman says, I use half a bottle each and every day just for brushing teeth, a bottle for cooking for the kitchen, and four bottles for drinking.
No tap water at all.
I don't trust tap water.
Now, what is characterizing the operations That non-food spray is very high performing industrial tool capacity production, supply chain distribution, extremely efficient and which is supporting a fantastic brand positioning nature health.
It's natural on health, which is explained in the website of the company with statements like every drop of non full springing has its source.
The closer to source, the better water we gain.
You can see on the website fantastic marketing, very aggressive communication as well.
In 2000 is going to launch a TV campaign demonstrating between quotes at spring, water is much better for planned growth and animal health and is going to very much criticize its competitors and there will be some difficulties with the competitors is going to be brought in front of the court and they will have to pay a fine for malicious competition, unfair disclosure and communication, et cetera.
And at that time he's going to say, but you know, know it's normal business.
The Pepsi Challenge was something quite interesting to observe.
Uh, you film somebody in the street, you said to this person, Hey, do you drink coca or do you drink Pepsi? I'm a Coca fan.
I will never change and so on.
Okay, let's make a blind test.
Do you prefer this one or this one? The person is testing the two and says, I prefer this one.
Then you disclose this is Pepsi.
Ah, what's a surprise? You produce sports at the TV and so on and so forth.
What was not exactly explained that the Pepsi was very, very fresh, high and so on and so forth.
The temperature was high outside and a Coke was not that fresh.
So obviously people preferred Pepsi because it was much cooler than Coca, A bit unfair, but basically John Chan says, we're allowed to do that.
It's normal business practice at the end of the day, it created a brand.
The brand is based on three pillars.
First, food security, a very, very big concern.
Low price.
Low price means that it's accessible to everybody and you are not concerned about using bottled water to brush your teeth.
The last pillar is high production and distribution efficiency.
The company is very good.
Now a brand has a value as you know, each and every year.
Inter brand produces a list of the 100 most valuable brands.
No full springing is not part of the list, but the brand joined the list produced by K, the very well-known marketing firm, number one for K Apple $880 billion, absolutely fantastic.
Then you have the brands by category of business.
One category is food and beverage.
Number one is CocaCola for the food and beverage with $106 billion, which puts CocaCola at the 10th rank in the total list and FU spraying is number A one in the list with $22 billion, which is about one third of the market value of the company.
Now let me say again that non spray is a real economic and financial success, economic success, commercial success.
First, if you look at the evolution of revenues over the last five years, the company doubled its revenues from about 17 billion revenue to 33, 30 4 billion.
If you exclude 2020, which is a very specific year because of the pandemic, the annual growth is about 15% on the average.
Sometimes it's a bit more recovery in 2021.
So you have a huge potential for growth.
The company is operating four different segments, but by far the largest one is water products.
Number two, interestingly is ready to drink tea products and if you look at the evolution, this is a green line on the graph, you see that it's up and significantly up.
For the others it's still quite marginal, but it's growing as well.
Historically, the water products we representing 60% of the total revenues the last two years it's a bit down and H 1 20 23, I will tell you a little bit later it's about 15% of the revenues quite big.
But if you look at the evolution of the relative percentage of T product is getting up and up 20% at the end of 2022, more than 25% first semester, 2023.
Operating costs as a percentage to revenues are quite stable.
Cost of sales from 40 to 45 depending more or less on energy cost.
If you look at selling distribution expenses, it's about 25%.
A little bit of economies of scale but extremely marginal, quite stable general and administrative expenses, 5% straight though it looks like very predictable in terms of cost structure.
At BM a day with 40, 45% cost sales and five plus 25 OPAC indirect cost, the EBIT dies quite high.
EBIT D is before the precision of the authorization and represents 30% to revenues for the juice beverage products which are vitamin product for people who are practicing sport and it is more than 40% for the other three segments.
Tea and water is more than 40% ebitda, which is absolutely huge in terms of commercial profitability.
So at the end of the day, the camp is EBITDA was 30% five years ago, it's now about 40%.
In the meantime, the company double its revenues, so it's not growth at the expense of commercial profitability, it's growth and commercial profitability in parallel.
This is about the ebitda.
If you look at the ebit, that is the difference.
That is the precision and multi.
This is a consequence of investing in capacity and so and so forth.
It's about eight to 10% of revenues depending on, and so at the end of the day, 40% is ebitda, 30% plus is ebit.
So a company extremely profitable in terms of p and a.
You have growth and you have commercial profitability, but you know that performance is not return on sales.
Performance is return on capital, which takes into account the assets turnover, the productivity of the asset.
The productivity of the asset is the ability of the company to transform, uh, tangible, intangible, non-current assets and working counter requirement into revenues.
Let's have a look at investment property, plant and equipment.
The company invest each and every year from 10 to 12% of its revenues, which is quite high and the company is naturally depreciating.
Its fixed asset depreciation and monetization, eight 10% of revenues.
But at the end of the day you add 12 and you deduct 10.
So property, plant and equipment is moving up but not that quickly.
In the meantime, the company is perfectly managing its operations so that the cash conversion cycle is strongly negative.
And here you have something very interesting to observe.
Of course a company has inventories, it's normal.
Of course a company is paying its suppliers with a delayed accounts people, but if you look at the accounts receivable, it represents five days of sales.
So the wholesalers, the distributors of any kind, they pay very quickly.
It's even better than that.
They pay in advance and the company has a strong link with its distributors.
But the consequence of this link and this contractual partnership with the distributors is that they pay advances.
You receive advances from the customer.
So at the end of the day, the cash conversion cycle is quite negative, which is a curiosity for a company which is not in distribution but which is in production.
General speaking, the working capital requirement is negative for retail and positive for producers here, the working capital requirement is strongly negative and is producing some cash resources.
So interestingly, when the capital is growing at 15% and when the cash conversion cycle represents minus 20 days of sales, it's like if the working capital requirement is producing cash, 15% of 20, which is three days of revenues, of additional cash each and every year, which contributes to the financing of the property plant and equipment which is not growing at the speed of light.
So at the end of the day, the relationships with the distributors are absolutely phenomenal.
They have strong links and they have kind of win-win partnership with revenue sharing practices of course, but at the end of the day, the company is receiving for 2.7 billion revenues advances and the company also shows operating liabilities in the penalty, discounts on rebate due to customers, an additional 1.1 billion and as a company is investing a lot, but paying with a delay payables on investment 1.5 billion, the working character is extremely negative, which contributes to the financing.
Now the consequence, the assets turnover is quite high.
It's even better than high.
It's improving.
Five years ago the assets turnover was 2.5.
Today it's about 4.5.
Then return capital is return on sales times assets done over.
When you multiply 30%, which is a very nice p and l by 4.5, which is a very nice balance aid, you get a return capital employed of 135%, which is absolutely outstanding.
On financial point of view, of course there is a kind of correlation between performance return capital and value creation because performance is what creates value.
But if you look at the market to book of the company during the last three years of listing 20 to 22, it's more than 60, which basically means that one MIB invested in business operations had a value, which is more than 60 MIB is today.
This fantastic value creation seems to be quite correlated with their outstanding financial performance.
But when you evaluate a company, there is performance in it because performance is what is creating value, but growth is boosting and accelerating performance to create value.
So it's interesting to calculate the growth which is consistent with that value and the performance of the company.
You can calculate the kind of theoretical market to book as if there was no growth in the free cash flows, revenues had been done whatsoever.
Then you compare this market to book without growth with the actual market to book.
And the intensity, if I may say of the gap gives you a kind of idea about the level of growth which is anticipated by financial investors.
At the end of the time, the market to book without any growth should be 20.
The actual market to book is more than 60.
Then you understand that the market, the financial investors are anticipating a huge growth potential in revenues, in profits and in cash labs.
Now it's very interesting to observe that the growth which you need during the next 10 years is 14% for the free cash flows each and every year, 14% during 10 years.
That's quite big and it raises two phenomenal questions.
The first one is, does a company have the growth drivers to keep on growing at the same rate? You remember it was about 15%.
The second question is also quite interesting.
When you grow, you consume financial resources, you need financial resources.
Will a company be able to finance its growth? You remember what is at stake is the dilution of the owner.
Let's first have a look at growth drivers.
Of course in 2020 the business is a bit stable.
2022, it's a bit up and 2023, first semester, 23%.
Wow.
In the meantime, in China, G D P is growing at a level of 5.5%.
Household consumption is uh, by 8.2%, and if you look at the different segments, water is 12%.
Ah, 12 is not 14 or 15 or whatsoever.
Yes, but tea products are uh by 60% and the others juice beverages and so on and so forth.
20 to 30%.
So you have the gross drivers and the first one is tea, ready to drink tea product.
Let's have a look now at gross financing.
Gross consumes financial resources.
This is absolutely obvious why? Because the day you grow, you have to increase your production capacity, your manufacturing footprint, you remember 10 to 12%.
You have also to take into account the working capital requirement.
Ah, good news, it's strongly negatives and gross is producing cash and not consuming cash.
The question is, is it durable? Is it enduring? Is it stable in the long term? That might be a question and the day you want to promote an increase growth rate of the other product, you have to invest in marketing, in promotion, in innovation and so on, so forth.
So the question is, is your p and l going to be as stable as anticipated? Now in finance, we have a nice concept to explain the ability of the company to grow and to sell finances.
Growth is name sustainable growth.
Let's go back to this concept.
The very big question is does a company have a capacity to finance his growth? Of course, you can't find on your growth.
You raise debt, you raise equity, you issue shares and so on so forth.
But the question is you want to finance your growth without diluting your shareholders.
You remember that John Chan holds 84% of non full springing and he wants to keep the control.
So you try to finance your growth without suing shares.
And then if you don't want to dilute your shareholders, your profit should be high because if you don't want to deteriorate your financial structure increasing debt, and if you want to keep debt over equity quite constant, then you need to generate plenty of profit or you can increase debt, but then you increase very much a financial risk and you put a company in a very dangerous situation.
The three words which are quite important is you want to finance growth and you want to kind of self-financing.
It should come from inside this equity increase so that you can keep your financial independence and you're not forced to issue shares each and every day.
The definition, technical definition of sustainable growth, it is a maximum growth rate of capital employment that the company can assume and sustain without issuing shares, again dilution and without increasing the debt ratio, without increasing the gearing debt divided by equity.
Now, in this definition, there are two phenomenal points.
It's not gross in the revenues, in the growth of the capital employed for a very simple reason.
You remember that shareholders and bankers, they don't finance the revenues.
They finance industrial operations thanks to which you can produce and generate revenues though basically the what is at stake is a growth in is how much we invest in the development of your capital employee, which has a consequence, which is you can produce and you generate more revenues.
This is first point.
The second point is it's about internal financing.
If it's about internal financing for equity, it means that it's about profitability and functional performance.
How do you calculate the sustainable growth rate? Ah, you want to increase your equity.
You have two ways to increase your equity.
You can increase your retain earnings or you can issue shares capital increase.
No, it should be zero.
We don't want to issue shares.
So the increase in equity is limited to increasing retain earnings, which is about an net earnings of the year minus dividends which are returned back to shareholders.
Very important ratio which characterizes the dividend policy of the company dividend pout, the rate of distribution D is dividend divided by an net earnings.
Which percentage of your net earnings you return to shareholders.
So the increase in retail earnings is net earnings, earnings after taxes minus D multiplied by earnings after taxes, so it's earnings after taxes multiplied by open the bracket one minus D close bracket.
Then the equity growth rate is the equity increase divided by the equity.
So it's increase in return earnings divided by equity, it's earnings after tax multiplied by one minus D divided by equity, no problem.
But earning such tax divided by equity is very well known.
It's how much you earn as a shareholder divided by how much you invested as a shareholder.
It's a return on shareholders' investment.
It's a financial profitability, it's a return on equity.
So you understand that the internal growth of equity without pursuing shares again is return equity multiplied by one minus dividend payout ratio.
If you want to keep a stable financial structure, debt should grow at the same rate as equity.
Then debt over equity is constant, but if debt is growing at the same rate as equity, you understand that capital employee should grow at the same rate.
Otherwise you have an issue in the gross financing.
So the self-finance, the sustainable growth rate is named G S and it's return equity multiplied by one minus dividend power ratio.
Let's calculate it for non footprint.
And then you have to observe the dividend policy of the company.
Interestingly, the company before it's listed was distributing a fantastic dividend.
It was distributing more than 150% of the earnings of the year.
So you take dividend divided by the earnings of the year and you get something which is very high stabilization in 21, 22, about 50%.
But the company says, we make no commitment, we provide no commitment on the distribution policy of the company.
There will be a can of commitment, which is the ability to sell financial growth.
And then if you calculate the return equity, you get something like 35 40% and 35% minus 50% gives you a very nice sustainable growth rate.
It was a bit more than 20% in 2021.
It is a bit less than 20% in 2022.
But then you have to compare the sustainable growth rate, which is the ability of the company to sell finances, growth with the actual capital employee growth and the capital employed for the reasons which I gave you before, increasing property, plant and equipment.
But uh, investment minus the precision and negative working capital requirement and cash conversion cycle.
The capital employees almost stable, which is quite outstanding for a company which is growing its revenues by 15%.
So you have stable capital employee growth and you have a strong ability to grow at the end of the day, no problem in the financing.
No problem in the financing and the company can't distribute a lot of dividend.
Why? Because it's cash rich.
Cash by far exceeds debt in the balancing.
The gearing is negative.
Debt over equity debt is about minus 70% of equity.
The leverage debt divided by EBITDA is strongly negative.
In fact, cash represents one year Fitbit done to make it simple.
So at the end of the day, you have a company whose financial structure is extremely robust, whose ability to grow is very high, and with growth in the capital employees quite controlled.
Which information do we get from the first half? 2023 growth? 23% net income plus 25%, and the company announces that they are going to pay a dividend of 7.6 billion rent.
Maybe if you look at the earnings of last year, general speaking, the dividend of this year is a consequence of the dividend of last year.
It represents about 60% of the earnings after tax of 2022.
Let's apply the ratio to the return equity, 35% but applied by one minus D one minus 60%, 40% of 35% is 14%.
This is a sustainable growth rate and you remember that the value of the company is justified by an annual increase, an annual increase in the free cash flow of 14%.
Same figure, quite harmony.
The challenges which are going to be met by the company in the futures are first commercial challenges per you growth in a T in order of course and others and so on and so forth.
You have to keep on growing your revenues.
You can read some marketing comments and statements, say that the company should premiumize its water, increase the prices to make it simple luxury things and so on so forth.
I'm not quite sure that it'll not have a depositioning consequence on the brand.
In addition to the commercial challenges, there will be a financial challenge the company wants to keep on investing in it.
Growth free cash load.
What about the evolution of the working capital requirement? Investing in capacity manufacturing footprint and operating expenses.
Because if you want to grow, sometimes you have to invest in marketing development expenses, but in my opinion, there will be also a third category of challenges, which is quite big.
Societal challenges.
The company was working under the radar.
Nobody knows you, you can do whatever you like, no consequence, and nobody is looking at observing and criticizing what you do.
Now the company is visible.
Everybody in China was caught by a surprise understanding that the number one, the richest person in China now is producing mineral water.
Now they are very interesting statements on social networks saying for example, oh, you produce Jewish beverage on peaches and the peaches come from Fukushima.
Ah, okay, so maybe there is a problem somewhere because you heard about nuclear accident on Fukushima.
Is there any consequence? Nobody knows, but everybody's criticizing on that statement.
When you produce and sell some mineral water, you sell it in bottles poly ET to after that b e t.
That's something which comes from carbon.
It's something which comes from oil products.
It's about chemical product and there will be some pollution here and there because you have to store, because et cetera, because you have to produce some scope three upstream purchases, uh, about your, about your production, and the company communicates very much on scope one, scope two, not very much on scope three downstream, no problem.
You drink the water upstream problem because you have to produce the bottles and there will be major, major challenges and this is why the question is if you are so profitable, if you can't distribute a dividend in 2020, which is uh, about what you raised from the capital market without deteriorating the bounty, why list the company now? He's no more under the radar.
He is in front of the screen.
Everybody's observing.
That's an additional challenge for the company.
Thank you very much.