Educational film, September 2025 // Doordash and Deliveroo
A significant international development
Doordash, the only firm in the fast delivery sector whose share price is up compared to the day of its IPO, has invested significantly in its operations, which allows it, today, a significant international development by buying Deliveroo.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:07.545 --> 00:00:10.095
Hello and welcome to this educational film
2
00:00:10.625 --> 00:00:14.615
which is devoted to the very well known lo of jungle,
3
00:00:14.705 --> 00:00:17.135
which is eat or be eaten.
4
00:00:18.205 --> 00:00:20.895
This food chain perspective is going to be illustrated
5
00:00:21.035 --> 00:00:24.455
by the acquisition of delivery by DoorDash,
6
00:00:25.665 --> 00:00:30.015
which industry It's about on demand delivery at large.
7
00:00:30.805 --> 00:00:34.015
It's going to be about food from restaurants, about grocery,
8
00:00:34.285 --> 00:00:36.495
from supermarkets, grocery stores
9
00:00:36.635 --> 00:00:39.895
or whatsoever it's done by the bicycle
10
00:00:40.275 --> 00:00:42.455
or by drones flying everywhere.
11
00:00:43.115 --> 00:00:46.855
And basically this is a very old business which has been
12
00:00:46.885 --> 00:00:50.655
massively disrupted by internet obviously
13
00:00:50.755 --> 00:00:54.215
and emergence of platforms on internet so
14
00:00:54.215 --> 00:00:56.015
that you can share the information
15
00:00:56.355 --> 00:00:59.095
and you can optimize the delivery itself.
16
00:01:00.125 --> 00:01:04.015
Basically, it's one of the segments which have been Uberized
17
00:01:04.925 --> 00:01:07.215
with the name of Uber, as you know,
18
00:01:07.475 --> 00:01:11.135
and Uber Eats is a very important player in this business
19
00:01:11.615 --> 00:01:12.775
together with DoorDash.
20
00:01:13.495 --> 00:01:15.575
DoorDash makes very important
21
00:01:16.095 --> 00:01:18.455
announcement on the 6th of May this year,
22
00:01:19.155 --> 00:01:21.855
the company is going to acquire delivery.
23
00:01:22.575 --> 00:01:24.935
DoorDash is predominantly in North America.
24
00:01:25.245 --> 00:01:27.415
Deliveroo is predominantly in Europe,
25
00:01:27.955 --> 00:01:30.215
so there won't be any major problem in terms
26
00:01:30.215 --> 00:01:32.015
of antitrust legislation.
27
00:01:32.755 --> 00:01:36.055
The price is 2.9 billion sterling pounds
28
00:01:36.055 --> 00:01:40.095
because Deliveroo is listed on the London Stock Exchange,
29
00:01:40.095 --> 00:01:43.215
which represents about $3.9 billion
30
00:01:43.275 --> 00:01:44.975
and it's going to be paid in cash.
31
00:01:45.645 --> 00:01:48.535
It's not a stock transaction, it's cash out,
32
00:01:49.075 --> 00:01:52.455
but it's not the only announcement made on 6th of May
33
00:01:52.525 --> 00:01:56.095
because DoorDash will make another acquisition whose name
34
00:01:56.155 --> 00:01:57.535
is seven rooms.
35
00:01:58.115 --> 00:02:01.655
It has nothing to do with supply chain organization
36
00:02:01.715 --> 00:02:04.135
of the delivery clients or whatsoever.
37
00:02:04.605 --> 00:02:06.855
It's about technology, it's about software,
38
00:02:07.125 --> 00:02:10.575
it's about online booking, so you understand
39
00:02:10.575 --> 00:02:14.615
that the company is growing, is investing quite a lot,
40
00:02:15.075 --> 00:02:18.215
and at the end of the day it's capitalizing on customer's
41
00:02:18.215 --> 00:02:21.535
portfolio together with user experience.
42
00:02:22.155 --> 00:02:23.815
The price, which is going to be paid
43
00:02:23.995 --> 00:02:27.855
by DoorDash is $1.2 billion against in cash.
44
00:02:28.505 --> 00:02:32.535
3.8, 3.9 plus 1.2 is about five point.
45
00:02:32.595 --> 00:02:34.055
So saying no problem,
46
00:02:34.315 --> 00:02:37.295
the company had the monnet in the bank account.
47
00:02:37.875 --> 00:02:39.375
The price which is going to be paid
48
00:02:39.375 --> 00:02:41.415
by DoorDash is 1.8 pounds.
49
00:02:42.205 --> 00:02:45.095
It's about uh, 180 pe.
50
00:02:46.035 --> 00:02:49.535
It shows a premium of 44% against the last stock price,
51
00:02:49.635 --> 00:02:52.295
and you see that on the graph immediately.
52
00:02:52.295 --> 00:02:56.815
The stock price is going to adjust to 180 minus a time lag
53
00:02:56.815 --> 00:02:58.655
between the moment the announcement is made
54
00:02:58.835 --> 00:03:00.965
and the moment it's going to be actually packed.
55
00:03:00.965 --> 00:03:02.925
Though the markets are absolutely
56
00:03:03.015 --> 00:03:05.125
validating it's going to work.
57
00:03:05.495 --> 00:03:09.325
There will be no problem in the antitrust legislation
58
00:03:09.385 --> 00:03:11.405
and authorities management
59
00:03:11.905 --> 00:03:14.085
and basically there will be no counter offer
60
00:03:14.085 --> 00:03:15.165
from competitors.
61
00:03:15.595 --> 00:03:19.325
This is another story DoorDash was created in
62
00:03:19.625 --> 00:03:21.445
2013.
63
00:03:22.065 --> 00:03:25.325
The first name is palo alto delivery.com
64
00:03:25.785 --> 00:03:28.045
and it's going to be created by people living
65
00:03:28.145 --> 00:03:29.445
around Palo Alto.
66
00:03:29.765 --> 00:03:31.325
Students at the University of Stanford
67
00:03:31.855 --> 00:03:34.085
whose names are respectively, Mr.
68
00:03:34.465 --> 00:03:36.765
Sue, Mr. Tang and Mr. Fong.
69
00:03:37.145 --> 00:03:39.405
So you probably imagine where they come from.
70
00:03:40.025 --> 00:03:42.445
The company is going to be immediately accepted
71
00:03:42.665 --> 00:03:45.445
by this fantastic and very well-known accelerator,
72
00:03:45.445 --> 00:03:47.045
which is Y Combinator.
73
00:03:47.725 --> 00:03:50.205
Y Combinator is providing services against equity.
74
00:03:50.315 --> 00:03:52.605
They're going to take 7% of equity
75
00:03:52.985 --> 00:03:55.725
and it's going to be immediately renamed
76
00:03:56.005 --> 00:03:57.685
DoorDash a few years later.
77
00:03:57.745 --> 00:04:01.565
In 2018, the number one in the US market is grab her.
78
00:04:02.485 --> 00:04:03.805
I will discuss a little bit later.
79
00:04:04.025 --> 00:04:07.445
Number two, DoorDash and number three, Uber Eats.
80
00:04:08.065 --> 00:04:09.565
So this is quite successful
81
00:04:09.745 --> 00:04:14.285
and it is so successful as the year after in 2019.
82
00:04:15.065 --> 00:04:18.325
Now DoorDash is number one with a market share
83
00:04:18.425 --> 00:04:21.325
of 28% in the United States.
84
00:04:21.785 --> 00:04:25.925
United States is about 95% of the revenues of DoorDash.
85
00:04:26.635 --> 00:04:29.965
This is why in 2020 using,
86
00:04:30.185 --> 00:04:31.965
if I may say COVID
87
00:04:32.225 --> 00:04:35.405
and the momentum behind COVID, the company is going
88
00:04:35.405 --> 00:04:39.445
to be listed initial public offering in 2020,
89
00:04:40.665 --> 00:04:41.955
it's going to be a success.
90
00:04:42.215 --> 00:04:45.515
Why? Because DoorDash is a commercial success.
91
00:04:45.575 --> 00:04:47.155
The company is skyrocketing in terms
92
00:04:47.155 --> 00:04:49.475
of revenues and because of COVID.
93
00:04:50.565 --> 00:04:54.555
COVID created an opportunity for companies like DoorDash,
94
00:04:54.865 --> 00:04:57.075
like Zoom because it was the ability
95
00:04:57.175 --> 00:04:58.915
to keep on running the business
96
00:04:59.215 --> 00:05:01.915
and have a normal quote, life
97
00:05:02.465 --> 00:05:05.075
without too much interacting between people.
98
00:05:05.775 --> 00:05:08.955
The IPO takes place in 2020 in December,
99
00:05:09.255 --> 00:05:13.315
but in June the company made its last offer in terms
100
00:05:13.335 --> 00:05:18.235
of private equity issue of shares, private series H,
101
00:05:18.775 --> 00:05:20.955
and at that time, the premo evaluation
102
00:05:20.955 --> 00:05:25.075
of the company is just a little bit beyond $15 billion.
103
00:05:25.935 --> 00:05:28.315
In December, the IPO is going
104
00:05:28.315 --> 00:05:31.635
to evaluate the company at $71 billion.
105
00:05:32.145 --> 00:05:34.755
It's tremendous increase in six months time.
106
00:05:35.535 --> 00:05:39.595
The price which is offered for the IPO is $102 per share.
107
00:05:40.095 --> 00:05:43.595
The opening price is going to be 182,
108
00:05:44.255 --> 00:05:46.875
but the market likes very much a company.
109
00:05:47.425 --> 00:05:50.115
Then there will be some fluctuations during this day
110
00:05:50.455 --> 00:05:54.795
and the closing price is going to be 189.5.
111
00:05:55.535 --> 00:05:59.205
So this is definitely a tremendous success as far
112
00:05:59.205 --> 00:06:00.925
as capital markets are concerned.
113
00:06:01.785 --> 00:06:04.565
If you look at the evolution of the revenues of DoorDash,
114
00:06:04.865 --> 00:06:06.765
you have the commercial success.
115
00:06:07.565 --> 00:06:10.205
Skyrocketing growth is absolutely huge.
116
00:06:10.205 --> 00:06:13.765
You remember what I said in 20 18, 20 19,
117
00:06:13.945 --> 00:06:16.525
the market share is about 30%.
118
00:06:16.635 --> 00:06:19.965
It's going to grow from 28% to today,
119
00:06:20.335 --> 00:06:23.005
67%, so two thirds
120
00:06:23.005 --> 00:06:26.325
of the American market are in the hands of DoorDash,
121
00:06:26.335 --> 00:06:27.685
which is huge growth.
122
00:06:28.465 --> 00:06:30.965
Of course, you see the growth, which is a linear growth,
123
00:06:31.105 --> 00:06:34.485
but in relative terms it is slowing down
124
00:06:35.025 --> 00:06:36.445
quotes a little bit,
125
00:06:37.065 --> 00:06:38.805
but 2024 as opposed
126
00:06:38.805 --> 00:06:42.325
to 2023 shows an increase in the revenues
127
00:06:42.425 --> 00:06:44.045
by 25%.
128
00:06:44.635 --> 00:06:47.405
When we compare that with delivery in a few minutes time,
129
00:06:47.435 --> 00:06:49.725
it's going to be a completely different story.
130
00:06:50.105 --> 00:06:52.205
Now, the good news when you generate revenues
131
00:06:52.345 --> 00:06:54.725
and growing revenues is that you are going
132
00:06:54.725 --> 00:06:56.045
to generate economies of scale.
133
00:06:57.015 --> 00:07:00.165
Costs are fixed, variable jury speaking,
134
00:07:00.405 --> 00:07:02.405
a little bit semi fixed and semi variable.
135
00:07:03.345 --> 00:07:05.845
The good news is when your revenues are growing
136
00:07:05.845 --> 00:07:08.125
and your costs are growing in absolute terms,
137
00:07:09.025 --> 00:07:12.485
but at a rate which is less than the growth in the revenues,
138
00:07:12.585 --> 00:07:15.725
and then you increase your cost by in absolute terms,
139
00:07:16.105 --> 00:07:18.085
but relative to revenues, it's down
140
00:07:18.225 --> 00:07:21.205
and it's a very nice way to reach breakeven
141
00:07:21.385 --> 00:07:22.925
and operating profitability.
142
00:07:23.885 --> 00:07:25.965
DoorDash is providing some information
143
00:07:25.965 --> 00:07:27.205
about its operating expenses.
144
00:07:27.775 --> 00:07:31.365
First we have the cost of sales, the cost of delivering,
145
00:07:31.505 --> 00:07:33.765
the cost of producing the goods
146
00:07:33.765 --> 00:07:35.845
and services which are sold to the customer.
147
00:07:36.225 --> 00:07:39.045
It first goes down and then it stabilizes once in
148
00:07:39.045 --> 00:07:40.285
infrastructure is set.
149
00:07:40.665 --> 00:07:42.685
That's the way it works. General
150
00:07:42.825 --> 00:07:45.805
and admin is down gradually down
151
00:07:45.805 --> 00:07:49.645
because you need less people per dollar.
152
00:07:49.825 --> 00:07:51.965
Of course, if you need one accountant to account
153
00:07:51.985 --> 00:07:55.205
for a certain level of revenue, if you multiply
154
00:07:55.345 --> 00:07:57.405
by two the revenue generated by the company,
155
00:07:57.505 --> 00:07:59.005
you don't need two accountants.
156
00:07:59.065 --> 00:08:00.805
You are going to generate economies of scale,
157
00:08:01.105 --> 00:08:03.245
so you need 1.7, 1.8.
158
00:08:03.385 --> 00:08:06.485
You increase the number of people working in a general
159
00:08:06.585 --> 00:08:10.565
and admin, but relative to revenue is down gradually down.
160
00:08:11.565 --> 00:08:12.685
Interestingly, research
161
00:08:12.705 --> 00:08:16.365
and development, very often you have a kind of two phases.
162
00:08:16.825 --> 00:08:19.325
The first one is you start running the business.
163
00:08:19.325 --> 00:08:21.045
You have massively invested in research
164
00:08:21.045 --> 00:08:23.365
and development to be a market leader,
165
00:08:23.825 --> 00:08:27.605
and then you start amortizing your research and development.
166
00:08:27.905 --> 00:08:29.045
That's absolutely fair.
167
00:08:29.045 --> 00:08:30.405
You generate economies of scale,
168
00:08:30.825 --> 00:08:31.965
but then you are the leader.
169
00:08:32.145 --> 00:08:33.725
You have fantastic market share
170
00:08:33.725 --> 00:08:35.925
and you want to remain at the head of the market.
171
00:08:36.235 --> 00:08:37.645
Then what do you have to do?
172
00:08:37.945 --> 00:08:40.485
You have to invest in innovation in order
173
00:08:40.545 --> 00:08:42.925
to improve your algorithm, in order
174
00:08:43.025 --> 00:08:45.325
to improve your optimization user
175
00:08:45.335 --> 00:08:46.925
experience and things like that.
176
00:08:47.435 --> 00:08:51.405
This is why sometimes it stabilizes and goes up again
177
00:08:51.665 --> 00:08:53.845
or stabilizes and is plus minus,
178
00:08:54.225 --> 00:08:58.285
but you have to keep on investing in innovation if you want
179
00:08:58.285 --> 00:08:59.445
to remain the leader.
180
00:09:00.185 --> 00:09:01.845
That's about the investment together
181
00:09:01.845 --> 00:09:04.205
with the capital expenditures, which are a consequence
182
00:09:04.225 --> 00:09:05.685
of growing the revenue.
183
00:09:06.485 --> 00:09:08.525
Interestingly, there's a cost item which is very often
184
00:09:08.525 --> 00:09:10.525
generating massive economies of scale.
185
00:09:10.545 --> 00:09:14.805
It sits on marketing, very simple reason at first,
186
00:09:14.905 --> 00:09:17.605
you attract customers, so you have to pay
187
00:09:17.605 --> 00:09:19.765
for the customer acquisition cost
188
00:09:20.265 --> 00:09:22.325
and it's going to cost you quite a lot of money,
189
00:09:22.945 --> 00:09:25.565
but then once the customers love your product,
190
00:09:26.105 --> 00:09:28.405
you don't have to acquire them anymore, you have
191
00:09:28.405 --> 00:09:32.845
to retain them, and the retention costs are always much more
192
00:09:32.845 --> 00:09:34.645
work than the acquisition cost
193
00:09:35.025 --> 00:09:36.885
and this is why the company is generating
194
00:09:37.625 --> 00:09:41.685
as any successful company in terms of client attractiveness,
195
00:09:42.385 --> 00:09:44.325
lot of economies of scale.
196
00:09:44.835 --> 00:09:47.205
This will have an impact on the operating profit.
197
00:09:47.825 --> 00:09:50.445
Now, the consequence of generating economies
198
00:09:50.445 --> 00:09:53.805
of scale in a growing company is that the profit,
199
00:09:54.065 --> 00:09:56.045
the operating profit is going to be up.
200
00:09:56.675 --> 00:09:59.245
It's absolutely dramatic at the beginning of the period
201
00:09:59.705 --> 00:10:02.885
and then what's going to happen 2020 when the company goes
202
00:10:02.885 --> 00:10:05.205
public, we are close to breakeven.
203
00:10:06.065 --> 00:10:10.885
The EBITDA is not positive, the EBIT is not positive,
204
00:10:11.065 --> 00:10:14.005
but the adjusted EBITDA is just a breakeven.
205
00:10:14.545 --> 00:10:16.845
You remember that the difference between EBIT
206
00:10:16.845 --> 00:10:18.645
and EBITDA is deci precision
207
00:10:18.645 --> 00:10:20.965
and amortization, which is a non-cash item,
208
00:10:21.625 --> 00:10:23.485
but when you calculate your ebitda,
209
00:10:23.745 --> 00:10:25.525
the accounting authorities, they ask you
210
00:10:25.525 --> 00:10:28.245
to take into account the stock based compensation,
211
00:10:28.845 --> 00:10:30.965
restricted stock units, stock options
212
00:10:31.025 --> 00:10:32.725
and so on so forth to treat that
213
00:10:32.945 --> 00:10:36.365
as an operating expenses in the calculation of the ebitda,
214
00:10:36.835 --> 00:10:40.325
they are expense, but these are non cash items,
215
00:10:40.945 --> 00:10:43.285
but at the end of the day, if you want to calculate a kind
216
00:10:43.285 --> 00:10:46.525
of really cash operating profit, it's going
217
00:10:46.605 --> 00:10:47.845
to be adjusted EBITDA
218
00:10:48.105 --> 00:10:52.445
and adjusted EBITDA is a breakeven in 2020, in 21,
219
00:10:52.825 --> 00:10:57.125
and in 22 in 23 it's going to dramatically go up
220
00:10:57.705 --> 00:10:59.125
and in 24 it's up
221
00:10:59.425 --> 00:11:03.125
and if you look at the first semester of 25, again, it's up.
222
00:11:05.665 --> 00:11:09.265
Interestingly, the EBITDA taking into account stock-based
223
00:11:09.265 --> 00:11:12.865
compensation is going to go to breakeven in 2023
224
00:11:13.245 --> 00:11:16.625
and the EBIT is going to BRE even in 2024.
225
00:11:16.925 --> 00:11:18.745
So you understand that there is a momentum
226
00:11:18.965 --> 00:11:22.705
and a momentum is you increase the return on sales
227
00:11:23.265 --> 00:11:25.145
dramatically each and every year.
228
00:11:26.045 --> 00:11:29.025
The other point is are you able with your profit
229
00:11:29.565 --> 00:11:32.225
to finance your growth when you grow, you have
230
00:11:32.225 --> 00:11:33.825
to invest in capital expenditures.
231
00:11:33.895 --> 00:11:35.385
It's not only property, plant
232
00:11:35.385 --> 00:11:38.105
and equipment, it's also software development,
233
00:11:38.135 --> 00:11:41.225
capitalized software development, and then you invest.
234
00:11:41.885 --> 00:11:44.105
What's going to happen at DoorDash,
235
00:11:44.635 --> 00:11:47.385
CapEx is down at the very beginning.
236
00:11:47.565 --> 00:11:49.105
You have to build infrastructure
237
00:11:49.565 --> 00:11:51.225
and then progressively capital
238
00:11:51.225 --> 00:11:52.865
expenditures are going to be down.
239
00:11:53.295 --> 00:11:57.085
Again, not in absolute terms, but relative to revenues.
240
00:11:57.425 --> 00:12:00.325
Now, if you look at the graph, capital expenditures are down
241
00:12:00.705 --> 00:12:05.445
as a percentage to revenues, four, 3%, something like that.
242
00:12:05.945 --> 00:12:08.045
In the meantime, while CapEx is down,
243
00:12:08.405 --> 00:12:09.685
adjusted a bit dies up.
244
00:12:10.385 --> 00:12:14.325
So interestingly, adjusted EBITDA is at breakeven in
245
00:12:14.325 --> 00:12:18.365
20, 21, 22, but it does not pay the CapEx.
246
00:12:18.985 --> 00:12:21.925
You can calculate EBITDA minus CapEx.
247
00:12:22.225 --> 00:12:25.165
Now, I prefer to calculate EBITDA divided
248
00:12:25.385 --> 00:12:26.565
by capital expenditures.
249
00:12:27.225 --> 00:12:29.765
How many times you pay your capital expenditures
250
00:12:29.805 --> 00:12:31.485
with your cash operating profit
251
00:12:32.145 --> 00:12:35.925
and interestingly it's going to become more than one,
252
00:12:36.265 --> 00:12:41.085
so ebitda definitely paying the capital expenditures in 2023
253
00:12:41.385 --> 00:12:43.645
and it's going to go up in 2024.
254
00:12:44.235 --> 00:12:47.125
Then the capital is generating an adjusted ebitda.
255
00:12:47.135 --> 00:12:48.845
Again, cash operating profit,
256
00:12:49.175 --> 00:12:52.165
which pays five times the capital expenditures,
257
00:12:52.745 --> 00:12:55.485
but you understand that you have an extremely virtual circle
258
00:12:55.785 --> 00:12:58.005
now because you generate a free cash flow,
259
00:12:58.005 --> 00:12:59.485
which is positive, you don't have
260
00:12:59.485 --> 00:13:01.245
to visit your shareholders each
261
00:13:01.245 --> 00:13:04.845
and every year to accumulate equity in order to pay
262
00:13:05.185 --> 00:13:06.845
for the losses and in order to pay
263
00:13:06.965 --> 00:13:09.205
for the capital expenditures, the gross,
264
00:13:10.265 --> 00:13:11.485
and that's very important
265
00:13:11.485 --> 00:13:13.605
because if you are free, cash flow is positive.
266
00:13:13.835 --> 00:13:17.005
What do you do with the money? There are two alternatives.
267
00:13:17.505 --> 00:13:20.085
You retain and invest your returns.
268
00:13:20.085 --> 00:13:22.125
That's what we are going to observe for delivery
269
00:13:22.865 --> 00:13:25.405
if few financial metrics about the balance sheet
270
00:13:25.465 --> 00:13:27.085
of DoorDash balance sheet,
271
00:13:27.105 --> 00:13:30.325
you remember the accounting statements assets on the one
272
00:13:30.325 --> 00:13:32.645
hand, equity and liabilities on the other hand,
273
00:13:32.905 --> 00:13:34.445
we find those people, we transform
274
00:13:34.445 --> 00:13:37.245
that into capital employed net operating assets
275
00:13:37.745 --> 00:13:39.405
and net financial resources.
276
00:13:39.505 --> 00:13:42.005
The net operating assets are predominantly made
277
00:13:42.025 --> 00:13:43.885
of long term assets
278
00:13:44.945 --> 00:13:47.445
and working capital requirements.
279
00:13:47.675 --> 00:13:51.845
Long-term assets is about 4.6 billion out
280
00:13:51.845 --> 00:13:53.805
of which you have a little bit of property plant
281
00:13:53.805 --> 00:13:57.005
and equipment obviously, but you have some goodwill
282
00:13:57.345 --> 00:14:01.485
and intangible assets which are very much a consequence
283
00:14:01.665 --> 00:14:03.085
of acquisitions.
284
00:14:03.675 --> 00:14:04.845
It's 2.8 billion,
285
00:14:05.345 --> 00:14:09.405
so 4.6 is 2.8 plus 1.8.
286
00:14:10.065 --> 00:14:13.125
It is about again, property, plant and equipment.
287
00:14:13.125 --> 00:14:15.005
The working capital requirement is made
288
00:14:15.005 --> 00:14:18.845
of in factories plus accounts receivable minus everything
289
00:14:18.845 --> 00:14:21.445
which is payable to operating stakeholders.
290
00:14:21.795 --> 00:14:24.885
There's no in factor discount business, it's pure service.
291
00:14:25.785 --> 00:14:27.685
Now you have some accounts with receiv well,
292
00:14:27.825 --> 00:14:31.205
but what is due to the stakeholders, the restaurants,
293
00:14:31.345 --> 00:14:35.925
the grocery stores, the dashers represent 2.2 billion.
294
00:14:36.195 --> 00:14:39.205
This is why the working character requirement is strongly
295
00:14:39.845 --> 00:14:41.445
negative by 3 billion.
296
00:14:42.205 --> 00:14:43.765
Interestingly, when you grow you have
297
00:14:43.765 --> 00:14:45.325
to finance your capital expenditures,
298
00:14:45.545 --> 00:14:47.725
but you also have to find out the growth in your working
299
00:14:47.725 --> 00:14:48.765
capital requirement,
300
00:14:48.985 --> 00:14:51.245
but when it's negative, if you grow,
301
00:14:51.435 --> 00:14:52.765
it's even more negative.
302
00:14:53.105 --> 00:14:55.685
The consequence is that the working capital requirement
303
00:14:56.405 --> 00:15:00.285
increase in absolute term is going to be a resource
304
00:15:00.545 --> 00:15:02.205
and not a use of funds.
305
00:15:03.105 --> 00:15:07.605
Now, 4.6 minus three is 1.6. This is cap employed.
306
00:15:08.265 --> 00:15:10.685
In front of that you have the net financial resources,
307
00:15:10.805 --> 00:15:13.725
a contribution of investors as a financing as a company.
308
00:15:14.235 --> 00:15:16.805
It's made of shareholders and financial creditors.
309
00:15:16.805 --> 00:15:19.445
Shareholders equity is 7.8,
310
00:15:19.945 --> 00:15:22.045
so it's much more than 1.6.
311
00:15:22.625 --> 00:15:25.765
Why? Because a net financial that the financial, that net
312
00:15:25.765 --> 00:15:28.765
of cash is strongly a negative.
313
00:15:28.825 --> 00:15:32.685
In fact, the company has much more cash than debt.
314
00:15:33.155 --> 00:15:35.965
Cash is exceeding debt by more than 6 billion.
315
00:15:36.355 --> 00:15:38.085
This is why when you do your shopping
316
00:15:38.225 --> 00:15:41.805
and you pay 5 billion, the money is in the bank account.
317
00:15:43.045 --> 00:15:46.085
Interestingly, shareholders equity is a contribution
318
00:15:46.465 --> 00:15:49.845
and the assets owned by the shareholders in the company,
319
00:15:49.985 --> 00:15:54.085
if I may say it's made of capital, additional paid capital
320
00:15:54.425 --> 00:15:56.685
and accumulated retain earnings,
321
00:15:57.345 --> 00:15:59.325
but retain earnings might be negative,
322
00:15:59.455 --> 00:16:03.245
especially when the company is starting its operations.
323
00:16:03.945 --> 00:16:05.765
Now if you take the example of DoorDash,
324
00:16:05.765 --> 00:16:10.125
shareholders equity is about 13.1 billion invested
325
00:16:10.705 --> 00:16:13.045
by the shareholders in the company
326
00:16:13.825 --> 00:16:17.525
before the company is listed, the debt company is listed
327
00:16:18.335 --> 00:16:20.685
minus the losses which were AC accumulated
328
00:16:20.705 --> 00:16:23.285
by the company in the first years of operations,
329
00:16:23.335 --> 00:16:26.205
which represent $5.3 billion.
330
00:16:26.905 --> 00:16:30.045
Of course, 7.8 minus 6.2 is 1.6.
331
00:16:30.345 --> 00:16:33.205
Net financial resources are matching with capital employed.
332
00:16:33.475 --> 00:16:37.435
This is accounting. Now, this was a balance sheet.
333
00:16:37.435 --> 00:16:39.715
Let's have a look at the profit and loss statement.
334
00:16:40.195 --> 00:16:43.595
Revenues in 20 24, 10 0.7 billion.
335
00:16:44.655 --> 00:16:47.435
Now if you divide the revenues by the capital employed,
336
00:16:47.495 --> 00:16:50.435
you get the assets turnover, the asset productivity,
337
00:16:50.725 --> 00:16:52.915
which we use in the DuPont and move formula.
338
00:16:53.215 --> 00:16:55.435
You remember, return capital is
339
00:16:55.655 --> 00:16:57.075
how much you make when you sell,
340
00:16:57.495 --> 00:17:00.435
but applied by how many times you generate revenues
341
00:17:00.485 --> 00:17:04.955
equivalent to invested capital assets to an over a 6.7,
342
00:17:04.965 --> 00:17:07.955
which is 10.7 divided by 1.6.
343
00:17:08.535 --> 00:17:12.035
Return on sales in 2024 is near the return.
344
00:17:12.035 --> 00:17:13.915
Capital is nearly obviously,
345
00:17:14.335 --> 00:17:19.155
but first semester 2025, the return on sales is 5%.
346
00:17:19.575 --> 00:17:22.315
If you multiply 5%, assuming that it's going
347
00:17:22.315 --> 00:17:24.315
to be the return sales for the whole year
348
00:17:24.615 --> 00:17:27.035
by the assets turnover, which is more than six,
349
00:17:27.415 --> 00:17:29.955
you get the return capital, which is going
350
00:17:29.955 --> 00:17:31.515
to be more than 30%.
351
00:17:31.745 --> 00:17:35.515
Then the company is by far paying its cost of capital.
352
00:17:36.055 --> 00:17:38.475
The company is generating a positive economic profit.
353
00:17:38.615 --> 00:17:40.155
The performance is positive.
354
00:17:40.975 --> 00:17:43.555
The growth or the value, which is a value of
355
00:17:43.555 --> 00:17:47.755
what you transport from the point of sale to the delivery
356
00:17:48.295 --> 00:17:50.565
is $47 billion.
357
00:17:51.045 --> 00:17:53.445
Interestingly, the adjusted EBITDA
358
00:17:53.445 --> 00:17:56.885
during the first semester again is one point 25 billion.
359
00:17:56.985 --> 00:18:00.165
If you divide one by the other, you get an EBITDA
360
00:18:00.685 --> 00:18:04.085
adjusted divided by growth order value, which is 2.6%.
361
00:18:04.995 --> 00:18:08.365
It's service. It's not huge margins
362
00:18:08.745 --> 00:18:11.085
but with a very high asset turnover,
363
00:18:11.465 --> 00:18:15.085
it can give you a return capital, which is extremely good
364
00:18:15.225 --> 00:18:18.405
and by far exceeding the weighted average cost of capital.
365
00:18:19.505 --> 00:18:21.685
Now, what is a consequence of that story
366
00:18:21.865 --> 00:18:24.325
and those matrix on the usual stock price,
367
00:18:25.245 --> 00:18:28.665
the companies listed on stock exchange in December 20.
368
00:18:29.455 --> 00:18:31.545
This is absolutely a success,
369
00:18:31.965 --> 00:18:35.025
but then there will be a post COVID period which is going
370
00:18:35.025 --> 00:18:38.145
to be dramatic for a number of companies and NASDAQ is down
371
00:18:38.525 --> 00:18:40.465
and DoorDash is very much down.
372
00:18:40.655 --> 00:18:45.585
It's going to get to a low point in 2022 at about 50 from
373
00:18:45.645 --> 00:18:49.945
200 down to 50, and then the NASDAQ is up
374
00:18:50.325 --> 00:18:52.105
and then DoorDash is up.
375
00:18:52.645 --> 00:18:54.625
The market capitalization of the company.
376
00:18:54.845 --> 00:18:58.065
The date is listed is you remember $71 billion.
377
00:18:58.635 --> 00:19:03.425
Today it's more than 110 billion, so there is a kind
378
00:19:03.425 --> 00:19:06.265
of additional market value added for the company,
379
00:19:06.355 --> 00:19:08.345
which is $40 billion.
380
00:19:08.805 --> 00:19:11.585
So it has been a good deal for the investors.
381
00:19:12.895 --> 00:19:16.665
It's about value creation. Why do you create value?
382
00:19:17.085 --> 00:19:18.905
Not because you are growing but
383
00:19:18.905 --> 00:19:21.425
because your growth is performing.
384
00:19:22.165 --> 00:19:24.425
Now you observe that their revenues were growing
385
00:19:24.885 --> 00:19:26.545
and the return capital employed,
386
00:19:26.545 --> 00:19:30.985
which was 0% in 2024 is now more than 30%,
387
00:19:31.325 --> 00:19:34.985
so it's not gross against profitability, it's growth
388
00:19:35.285 --> 00:19:36.305
for profitability,
389
00:19:36.925 --> 00:19:39.785
and then you are going to accelerate your profitability
390
00:19:40.055 --> 00:19:41.705
with a growth in your revenues.
391
00:19:41.955 --> 00:19:43.265
Again, it's about economies
392
00:19:43.265 --> 00:19:46.065
and scale, which is a perfect story for a company
393
00:19:46.445 --> 00:19:48.225
and that is about profitable.
394
00:19:48.575 --> 00:19:49.865
When you're experiencing
395
00:19:49.965 --> 00:19:52.865
and generating a profitable growth, you create value.
396
00:19:53.815 --> 00:19:55.505
Then if you want to calculate,
397
00:19:55.615 --> 00:19:58.265
observe the value which is created a stock market,
398
00:19:58.555 --> 00:20:00.105
there are different ratios.
399
00:20:00.285 --> 00:20:03.065
One which I very much use is a market to book,
400
00:20:03.065 --> 00:20:06.265
which is a price value divided by capital employed.
401
00:20:06.725 --> 00:20:08.905
The price value is market capital debt
402
00:20:09.165 --> 00:20:11.105
and capital employed is the amount
403
00:20:11.105 --> 00:20:13.265
of money you invest in your business operations,
404
00:20:13.885 --> 00:20:18.305
but capital employed is not that relevant for this kind
405
00:20:18.305 --> 00:20:20.025
of business because it's quite low.
406
00:20:20.415 --> 00:20:23.345
It's not very much capital intensive by far.
407
00:20:23.535 --> 00:20:26.145
Sometimes you can use a price to book,
408
00:20:26.165 --> 00:20:29.705
so you take the market cap divided by the book equity,
409
00:20:29.805 --> 00:20:33.065
but in the book equity you have not only what was invested
410
00:20:33.165 --> 00:20:34.345
by the shareholders,
411
00:20:34.645 --> 00:20:37.905
but also you have a few things like treasury stock,
412
00:20:38.455 --> 00:20:41.225
like losses, exactly for DoorDash,
413
00:20:41.525 --> 00:20:44.145
but what I prefer is to calculate the price to capital.
414
00:20:44.935 --> 00:20:46.705
Capital is what was invested
415
00:20:46.725 --> 00:20:48.565
by the shareholders throughout the years
416
00:20:48.865 --> 00:20:50.965
and you remember it is 13.1.
417
00:20:51.505 --> 00:20:53.605
Now the value is 111.
418
00:20:53.705 --> 00:20:58.285
If you divide 111 by 13.1, you get 8.5,
419
00:20:58.575 --> 00:21:00.445
which means that on the average, each
420
00:21:00.445 --> 00:21:01.525
and every dollar invested
421
00:21:01.545 --> 00:21:06.005
by the shareholders in the company was multiplied by 8.5.
422
00:21:06.315 --> 00:21:07.765
This is value creation
423
00:21:07.945 --> 00:21:11.205
and this is a perfect consistency between performance,
424
00:21:11.505 --> 00:21:12.885
growth and value.
425
00:21:13.795 --> 00:21:17.725
This does not go without a little bit of legal issues,
426
00:21:17.895 --> 00:21:21.725
which were always observed as far as Uberization
427
00:21:22.235 --> 00:21:24.125
processes were observed.
428
00:21:24.865 --> 00:21:28.445
One is about labor relations, employee status.
429
00:21:29.265 --> 00:21:32.285
Are they employed of the company? Are they independent?
430
00:21:32.285 --> 00:21:35.285
Don't you understand that in terms of social security
431
00:21:35.385 --> 00:21:37.645
and a few things like that, it might have an
432
00:21:37.645 --> 00:21:39.245
importance remuneration.
433
00:21:39.865 --> 00:21:43.805
Is there any minimum remuneration? What about the ties?
434
00:21:43.805 --> 00:21:44.805
What about the tips?
435
00:21:45.105 --> 00:21:47.365
How are they shared within the company, et cetera.
436
00:21:47.465 --> 00:21:52.165
Plenty of problem cartel antitrust, GrubHub
437
00:21:52.545 --> 00:21:56.525
and Uber is and DoorDash are dominant on the US market
438
00:21:56.625 --> 00:21:58.765
and the antitrust authorities consider that.
439
00:21:59.235 --> 00:22:02.485
It's not exactly fair the way the companies are
440
00:22:02.485 --> 00:22:03.605
running the business.
441
00:22:04.075 --> 00:22:06.525
Sometimes DoorDash is accused
442
00:22:06.545 --> 00:22:09.165
of registering restaurants again, their will
443
00:22:09.625 --> 00:22:12.165
and then misappropriating orders.
444
00:22:12.695 --> 00:22:14.325
There is a very interesting example
445
00:22:14.425 --> 00:22:16.365
of a restaurant which did not want
446
00:22:16.365 --> 00:22:17.805
to be registered by DoorDash.
447
00:22:17.825 --> 00:22:21.485
It was registered by DoorDash on the platform of the company
448
00:22:22.185 --> 00:22:23.605
and when the clients they wanted
449
00:22:23.625 --> 00:22:26.485
to order something from the restaurants, DoorDash will say,
450
00:22:26.485 --> 00:22:28.125
no, no, it's too far from where you live,
451
00:22:28.305 --> 00:22:30.845
but by the way, we have another restaurant which is much
452
00:22:30.845 --> 00:22:31.965
closer to where you live
453
00:22:32.225 --> 00:22:36.245
and now they were redirecting the orders from the
454
00:22:36.525 --> 00:22:37.805
restaurant, which did not want
455
00:22:37.965 --> 00:22:41.125
to be DoorDash register into another restaurant which was
456
00:22:41.125 --> 00:22:42.445
paying the fees for DoorDash.
457
00:22:42.715 --> 00:22:44.405
It's absolutely illegal.
458
00:22:45.145 --> 00:22:47.125
It was also about illegal sales
459
00:22:47.225 --> 00:22:49.085
of data, et cetera, et cetera.
460
00:22:49.105 --> 00:22:52.085
You know that Uber, DoorDash, et cetera,
461
00:22:52.435 --> 00:22:56.205
they are not exactly um appropriate in terms
462
00:22:56.385 --> 00:22:58.925
of compliance with legal issues.
463
00:22:59.745 --> 00:23:02.765
Now, the target deliver story,
464
00:23:02.905 --> 00:23:07.165
the company starting 2013 is starting in United States.
465
00:23:07.265 --> 00:23:10.605
It is in Europe. United Arab ate
466
00:23:11.245 --> 00:23:14.445
a little bit in Asia through Singapore and Hong Kong.
467
00:23:14.905 --> 00:23:16.805
Do you understand? There is absolutely no
468
00:23:16.805 --> 00:23:18.205
overlap in terms of business.
469
00:23:18.425 --> 00:23:20.685
The DoorDash buys delivery is not going
470
00:23:20.685 --> 00:23:24.405
to change the competition in Europe, so no problem.
471
00:23:24.665 --> 00:23:28.525
The competitors are just e takeaway and Uber Eats.
472
00:23:29.225 --> 00:23:30.925
In 2021, the company is listed.
473
00:23:30.985 --> 00:23:33.165
You remember it was 24 DoorDash
474
00:23:33.905 --> 00:23:38.525
and the IPO stock price offer is 3.9 starting
475
00:23:38.525 --> 00:23:42.725
pounds, but it's not going to be as nice as
476
00:23:43.285 --> 00:23:48.165
DoorDash because now the stock price is closing at 2.84,
477
00:23:48.625 --> 00:23:52.845
so it's not going to be a success on an IPO point of view.
478
00:23:53.555 --> 00:23:56.885
They will have the same comparable legal problems,
479
00:23:57.695 --> 00:24:00.445
legal relation, antitrust and so on and so forth.
480
00:24:00.445 --> 00:24:02.165
They have even a client.
481
00:24:02.735 --> 00:24:05.165
There is even a problem which had not been experienced
482
00:24:05.165 --> 00:24:06.405
likely by DoorDash.
483
00:24:06.545 --> 00:24:09.125
One day a deliverable client is beaten.
484
00:24:09.665 --> 00:24:12.085
Um, it's not very good in terms of uh,
485
00:24:12.405 --> 00:24:13.605
UX and things like that.
486
00:24:14.105 --> 00:24:17.725
Now, the market share for DoorDash in the US is 68%
487
00:24:18.465 --> 00:24:19.685
for uk, France
488
00:24:19.785 --> 00:24:22.445
and Italy, which has dominant markets of deliver
489
00:24:22.475 --> 00:24:24.165
because of competition.
490
00:24:24.705 --> 00:24:27.005
The market share is around 30%,
491
00:24:27.785 --> 00:24:29.045
but you understand that you have
492
00:24:29.045 --> 00:24:30.685
to fight against big players
493
00:24:31.185 --> 00:24:33.965
and if you want to fight, you have to attract customers.
494
00:24:34.225 --> 00:24:36.085
If you want to attract customers, you have
495
00:24:36.085 --> 00:24:39.165
to improve the Euro experience and then you have to invest.
496
00:24:40.835 --> 00:24:45.045
What about the revenues generated by deliver skyrocketing?
497
00:24:45.645 --> 00:24:47.725
A nice increase Today it's about 2 billion.
498
00:24:47.995 --> 00:24:49.725
It's not the same size as 10 billion,
499
00:24:49.825 --> 00:24:52.005
but it's not the same geography as well.
500
00:24:52.385 --> 00:24:53.885
But what is very interesting is
501
00:24:53.885 --> 00:24:55.325
that if you look at the last three years,
502
00:24:55.465 --> 00:24:56.765
growth is out of the picture.
503
00:24:57.345 --> 00:25:00.845
It was a little bit closer to zero
504
00:25:01.445 --> 00:25:05.565
positive in 2022 and it's near in 23 and 24.
505
00:25:05.625 --> 00:25:07.885
Do you understand that growth is really
506
00:25:07.905 --> 00:25:09.045
an issue for the company?
507
00:25:09.235 --> 00:25:11.205
This is when the last presentation made
508
00:25:11.205 --> 00:25:12.525
to the financial analysis.
509
00:25:12.825 --> 00:25:15.445
The company says, oh, orders are back to growth.
510
00:25:15.955 --> 00:25:19.685
Outstanding growth. The number of orders growing by 2%.
511
00:25:20.505 --> 00:25:22.765
The gross order value, the value of
512
00:25:22.765 --> 00:25:26.845
what you are delivering is increased by 6%.
513
00:25:27.065 --> 00:25:29.725
So if the gross order value is up by 6%
514
00:25:30.065 --> 00:25:33.405
and the number of orders are by 2%, it means that the value
515
00:25:33.405 --> 00:25:36.605
of what you are delivering is up by 4%,
516
00:25:37.465 --> 00:25:40.765
but the company mentions in a small line that the 4%
517
00:25:41.345 --> 00:25:42.605
is definitely inflation.
518
00:25:43.345 --> 00:25:46.725
So what is growing your revenues is not really
519
00:25:46.795 --> 00:25:48.085
what people are buying,
520
00:25:48.455 --> 00:25:50.445
using your service and so on and so forth.
521
00:25:50.515 --> 00:25:54.085
It's just inflation, which is growing the revenues, which is
522
00:25:54.645 --> 00:25:55.965
absolutely not recommended.
523
00:25:57.655 --> 00:26:00.715
Of course a company generated the column is a scale
524
00:26:00.815 --> 00:26:04.555
and could reduce the cost per the company does not say very
525
00:26:04.555 --> 00:26:06.795
much about the indirect cost.
526
00:26:06.855 --> 00:26:09.475
You remember for DoorDash, we have displays sales
527
00:26:09.535 --> 00:26:12.995
and marketing, we have general admin, R
528
00:26:12.995 --> 00:26:14.195
and d and so on so forth.
529
00:26:14.615 --> 00:26:17.955
As far as delivery is concerned, we just have cost of sales
530
00:26:18.015 --> 00:26:20.915
and the other indirect cost, it's down
531
00:26:21.455 --> 00:26:24.035
and it's stabilizing for a very simple reason,
532
00:26:24.035 --> 00:26:26.155
which is the company is not growing.
533
00:26:26.535 --> 00:26:29.435
So you can improve your productivity, reducing your cost.
534
00:26:29.785 --> 00:26:31.635
It's going to improve a little bit the picture,
535
00:26:31.975 --> 00:26:35.035
but it's not very much the increase in the revenues,
536
00:26:35.035 --> 00:26:37.435
which is reducing your cost per revenue.
537
00:26:38.345 --> 00:26:41.035
When you observe the evolution of EBIT ebitda,
538
00:26:41.035 --> 00:26:44.885
an adjusted ebitda, you have roughly less the same track.
539
00:26:45.545 --> 00:26:48.285
So it's very strongly negative at the very beginning
540
00:26:48.285 --> 00:26:51.165
of the period for Deliveroo as it was for DoorDash
541
00:26:51.705 --> 00:26:55.045
and you are progressively getting to break even,
542
00:26:55.825 --> 00:26:57.125
but it's much slower
543
00:26:57.625 --> 00:27:02.085
and when you look at the evolution, you are EBITDA
544
00:27:02.465 --> 00:27:06.325
and adjusted EBITDA breakeven in online 23
545
00:27:06.785 --> 00:27:09.565
and 24 is just a little bit positive,
546
00:27:10.025 --> 00:27:12.845
but definitely it's not the same cost structure.
547
00:27:12.995 --> 00:27:14.565
It's not the same return on sales.
548
00:27:14.945 --> 00:27:16.845
So you understand that for DoorDash,
549
00:27:17.185 --> 00:27:20.325
the momentum is up for delivery.
550
00:27:20.585 --> 00:27:23.005
The momentum is a little bit more stable.
551
00:27:24.955 --> 00:27:26.255
Now, when you make a profit,
552
00:27:26.755 --> 00:27:28.975
you transform this profit into cash flow.
553
00:27:29.355 --> 00:27:32.335
You are a bid die positive, adjusted or not,
554
00:27:32.635 --> 00:27:34.455
and you have to pay your capital expenditures
555
00:27:34.555 --> 00:27:37.295
and you have to finance your working capital requirement.
556
00:27:37.315 --> 00:27:40.095
The good news is a working capital requirement is negative
557
00:27:40.555 --> 00:27:43.255
for delivery and for DoorDash, no problem.
558
00:27:44.085 --> 00:27:46.135
It's essential. It is kind of business
559
00:27:46.315 --> 00:27:48.335
and then you are going to generate a positive
560
00:27:48.595 --> 00:27:49.855
EBITDA minus CapEx.
561
00:27:50.165 --> 00:27:52.655
Then your free cash flow is positive when you generate
562
00:27:52.815 --> 00:27:53.855
a positive free cash flow.
563
00:27:53.855 --> 00:27:56.655
What do you do with the money you retain
564
00:27:57.075 --> 00:27:58.735
and invest your return?
565
00:27:59.035 --> 00:28:01.375
And then OO is very proud to announce
566
00:28:01.445 --> 00:28:05.295
that in 2024 it's a first year of positive free cash flow.
567
00:28:05.435 --> 00:28:08.655
And what do they do with Monet? They buy back their share.
568
00:28:09.285 --> 00:28:10.455
They don't pay dividends
569
00:28:10.455 --> 00:28:11.975
because they accumulated plenty of losses,
570
00:28:12.355 --> 00:28:14.655
so they're returning the cash to the shareholders.
571
00:28:15.165 --> 00:28:19.735
More than 100 million starting pound in 2024.
572
00:28:20.365 --> 00:28:23.015
When the company is announcing the outlook in terms
573
00:28:23.015 --> 00:28:26.815
of growth and ebitda, the company is saying, oh, we are back
574
00:28:26.815 --> 00:28:30.975
to growth ball, single digit, high single digit,
575
00:28:30.975 --> 00:28:35.095
but single digit adjusted EBITDA is going to increase,
576
00:28:35.555 --> 00:28:37.855
but if you increase the EBITDA in order
577
00:28:37.915 --> 00:28:39.775
to increase the return to the shareholders,
578
00:28:40.445 --> 00:28:42.855
it's not extremely bright in terms
579
00:28:42.955 --> 00:28:44.495
of future for the company.
580
00:28:44.845 --> 00:28:48.215
When you benchmark the operating profit generated
581
00:28:48.315 --> 00:28:53.095
by DoorDash and deliver, interestingly it's quite the same.
582
00:28:53.275 --> 00:28:56.815
If you look at the EBIT itself, quite same level
583
00:28:56.995 --> 00:28:58.135
of operat income.
584
00:28:58.675 --> 00:29:01.015
Now they are breakeven in 2024,
585
00:29:01.355 --> 00:29:03.295
but there is no dramatic difference.
586
00:29:03.555 --> 00:29:08.055
The difference is in the adjusted ebitda, DoorDash wins
587
00:29:08.195 --> 00:29:11.735
by a very wide margin against Deliveroo
588
00:29:12.195 --> 00:29:15.895
and then what does Deliveroo do with its ebitda?
589
00:29:16.115 --> 00:29:20.415
It returns the cash. What does DoorDash do with ebitda?
590
00:29:20.875 --> 00:29:24.175
It invests. That's a completely different philosophy.
591
00:29:24.355 --> 00:29:25.775
Now let's try to correlate that
592
00:29:25.775 --> 00:29:27.095
with the original stock price.
593
00:29:27.515 --> 00:29:29.255
You remember what I said with DoorDash,
594
00:29:29.645 --> 00:29:33.455
fantastic IPO then down stabilization up.
595
00:29:33.645 --> 00:29:34.815
What about the competitors?
596
00:29:34.875 --> 00:29:39.135
The competitors are Deliveroo obviously, which is down
597
00:29:39.515 --> 00:29:40.575
and remains down.
598
00:29:40.715 --> 00:29:43.445
Oh, it's up during the last weeks. Why?
599
00:29:43.555 --> 00:29:45.565
Because DoorDash is making an offer,
600
00:29:46.065 --> 00:29:49.845
but without the offer of DoorDash it would remain flat.
601
00:29:50.675 --> 00:29:55.445
Maan in China, same story, just a takeaway, same story.
602
00:29:55.785 --> 00:29:57.285
The only winner in terms
603
00:29:57.285 --> 00:30:00.525
of shareholder value creation over the long term is
604
00:30:00.525 --> 00:30:02.205
definitely DoorDash.
605
00:30:03.775 --> 00:30:06.875
And now if you compare the stock market trajectories
606
00:30:06.875 --> 00:30:09.275
of all these companies, you understand that
607
00:30:09.275 --> 00:30:14.075
for the period DoorDash is plus 50% deliver roof
608
00:30:14.295 --> 00:30:16.355
and Mayan eight minus 60.
609
00:30:16.575 --> 00:30:19.555
Of course for deliver its minus 60 plus 20
610
00:30:19.785 --> 00:30:22.195
because of the offer made by DoorDash,
611
00:30:22.495 --> 00:30:25.235
but without the offer it would have been minus 60
612
00:30:26.155 --> 00:30:29.275
delivery hero just in takeaway minus 80.
613
00:30:30.055 --> 00:30:31.555
So you understand that the one
614
00:30:31.655 --> 00:30:33.555
and unique company which is creating value
615
00:30:33.555 --> 00:30:38.355
for its shareholders is by far DoorDash, as I just said,
616
00:30:38.355 --> 00:30:39.675
DoorDash has competitors.
617
00:30:40.025 --> 00:30:43.195
Deliveroo, we already discussed delivery Hero,
618
00:30:43.945 --> 00:30:45.915
just e takeaway and may try.
619
00:30:46.495 --> 00:30:49.565
Let's take a few minutes to discuss these competitors
620
00:30:49.785 --> 00:30:53.645
and their respective power delivery hero is a tremendous
621
00:30:53.675 --> 00:30:54.685
revenue growth,
622
00:30:55.375 --> 00:30:57.845
tremendous success in a commercial point of view.
623
00:30:58.385 --> 00:31:01.765
Now, the company we started from very low a few years ago is
624
00:31:01.765 --> 00:31:05.245
now at more than 12 billion euros of turnover.
625
00:31:05.905 --> 00:31:09.575
Global prisons, Europe, middle East
626
00:31:09.575 --> 00:31:12.815
and North Africa, Asia, Americas,
627
00:31:12.815 --> 00:31:14.455
north America, Latin America.
628
00:31:15.075 --> 00:31:17.015
The company is still generating losses,
629
00:31:17.595 --> 00:31:19.615
but the company is now positive in terms
630
00:31:19.755 --> 00:31:21.695
of free cash flow generation.
631
00:31:22.395 --> 00:31:25.455
So the company is generating these economies of scale,
632
00:31:25.455 --> 00:31:27.455
which are not high enough to reach break even,
633
00:31:27.875 --> 00:31:31.135
but the company is very big, is very successful,
634
00:31:31.675 --> 00:31:34.135
and now is not consuming cash anymore,
635
00:31:34.625 --> 00:31:37.095
which makes the company much more powerful in the
636
00:31:37.095 --> 00:31:39.595
competitive game process.
637
00:31:40.055 --> 00:31:41.675
Uh, process was not on the list.
638
00:31:41.675 --> 00:31:44.395
Process was indirectly on the list.
639
00:31:45.175 --> 00:31:49.155
The company has been created from Naspers, which is a very
640
00:31:49.815 --> 00:31:51.955
big investor in South Africa.
641
00:31:52.735 --> 00:31:56.315
Nasper decided to list separately on the Amsterdam stock
642
00:31:56.715 --> 00:32:00.515
exchange its investment arm, which was named process
643
00:32:01.415 --> 00:32:05.475
and now Naspers has 73.1% of process.
644
00:32:05.525 --> 00:32:08.115
Definitely the controlling interest by far
645
00:32:08.665 --> 00:32:10.475
process is very well known
646
00:32:11.095 --> 00:32:14.435
for its equity stake in Tencent today.
647
00:32:14.455 --> 00:32:17.915
The company holds 23.5% of Tencent.
648
00:32:18.175 --> 00:32:22.395
It was 45% in 2001, so it was
649
00:32:22.975 --> 00:32:25.315
in the early league of the shareholders
650
00:32:25.415 --> 00:32:28.475
and founders of the company, which was a tremendous success.
651
00:32:29.125 --> 00:32:33.835
Today, the value of the 23.5% is still holding in Tencent
652
00:32:34.055 --> 00:32:36.915
is $155 billion.
653
00:32:38.035 --> 00:32:40.530
Interestingly, when you look at the market capitalization
654
00:32:40.530 --> 00:32:44.365
of process, it's less, it's about $130 billion.
655
00:32:44.745 --> 00:32:47.725
So you understand that the stock market capitalization
656
00:32:47.725 --> 00:32:50.965
of the company is much less at this net asset value.
657
00:32:51.705 --> 00:32:54.565
You have at least one asset which is worth significantly
658
00:32:54.715 --> 00:32:56.645
more than the value of all the assets
659
00:32:57.665 --> 00:33:00.125
in the other assets held by process.
660
00:33:00.465 --> 00:33:03.365
You have 28% of delivery.
661
00:33:03.535 --> 00:33:06.045
Hello, you have 4%
662
00:33:06.145 --> 00:33:08.725
of MA value in the delivery business.
663
00:33:08.775 --> 00:33:13.565
Again, you have 100% of food which is based in Brazil.
664
00:33:13.795 --> 00:33:15.605
Same business. Same business.
665
00:33:16.295 --> 00:33:18.685
Wiggy in India, which was recently listed,
666
00:33:19.105 --> 00:33:21.445
the company holds 25%.
667
00:33:22.145 --> 00:33:25.605
So the company is very much in a global presence
668
00:33:26.225 --> 00:33:28.085
and is a significant players
669
00:33:28.115 --> 00:33:30.445
through different equity stakes.
670
00:33:31.365 --> 00:33:35.325
Interestingly, a few years ago in 2020 process wanted
671
00:33:35.465 --> 00:33:39.765
to buy, just eat for 5.5 billion pounds
672
00:33:40.545 --> 00:33:43.565
and in fact just it was acquired by takeaway
673
00:33:43.625 --> 00:33:47.685
and it became just eat takeaway in 2021,
674
00:33:47.715 --> 00:33:52.565
just eat takeaway bought GrubHub for $7.3 billion.
675
00:33:52.825 --> 00:33:57.525
You remember the one which was number one when DoorDash was
676
00:33:57.555 --> 00:34:01.885
only number two, but GrubHub was a disaster
677
00:34:02.705 --> 00:34:05.045
and what was acquired in 21
678
00:34:05.265 --> 00:34:08.685
for $7.3 billion is sold by Jesse
679
00:34:09.205 --> 00:34:13.365
Takeaway in 2024 for only $650 million.
680
00:34:13.875 --> 00:34:15.285
It's a dramatic loss.
681
00:34:16.115 --> 00:34:21.005
Then interestingly now process is by just in takeaway
682
00:34:21.385 --> 00:34:26.085
for $4.3 billion, so much less than what was paid
683
00:34:26.105 --> 00:34:28.725
by just takeaway to buy GrubHub.
684
00:34:28.825 --> 00:34:29.925
That's a terrible story.
685
00:34:30.025 --> 00:34:32.445
So processes buying just a takeaway,
686
00:34:32.615 --> 00:34:37.085
which is a significant shareholder of delivery Herald,
687
00:34:37.665 --> 00:34:39.125
that's going to be a problem
688
00:34:39.585 --> 00:34:41.005
and this is why in order
689
00:34:41.025 --> 00:34:44.645
to get the agreement from the antitrust authorities at the
690
00:34:44.645 --> 00:34:46.805
level of Europe, there will be partial
691
00:34:47.425 --> 00:34:52.005
or total sale of the delivery hero stake held by process.
692
00:34:52.655 --> 00:34:53.765
We'll see how it works,
693
00:34:54.425 --> 00:34:56.125
but you understand that process
694
00:34:56.785 --> 00:34:58.685
is an extremely strong company.
695
00:34:59.155 --> 00:35:02.245
They want cash to sell a few Tencent shares.
696
00:35:02.245 --> 00:35:05.525
So there the company has about $18 billion
697
00:35:05.625 --> 00:35:07.085
of cash in the bank account.
698
00:35:07.555 --> 00:35:10.085
It's a considerable financial power.
699
00:35:11.235 --> 00:35:14.075
Interestingly, the company was created in South Africa,
700
00:35:14.575 --> 00:35:16.635
but the company is in Brazil.
701
00:35:17.115 --> 00:35:20.275
Haifu, the company is in India, Sweden,
702
00:35:20.975 --> 00:35:23.195
the company is in China, Mayan,
703
00:35:23.935 --> 00:35:28.795
and now the company is in Europe with just a takeaway
704
00:35:29.015 --> 00:35:30.275
and delivery hero.
705
00:35:30.525 --> 00:35:31.555
Maybe, maybe not.
706
00:35:32.175 --> 00:35:36.195
If you combine Brazil, India and China
707
00:35:36.415 --> 00:35:39.965
and South Africa, you get something which is a little bit
708
00:35:40.065 --> 00:35:41.165
of the bricks
709
00:35:41.805 --> 00:35:44.925
'cause this is definitely a bricks company
710
00:35:45.715 --> 00:35:46.805
excluding Russia.
711
00:35:49.035 --> 00:35:52.615
If you look at May one now, may one was created in 2010
712
00:35:52.915 --> 00:35:55.735
by a gentleman who is still there, CEO
713
00:35:55.815 --> 00:35:57.175
of the company, Wong Singh.
714
00:35:57.485 --> 00:36:02.055
This is also a big player, 2024 market capitalization,
715
00:36:02.555 --> 00:36:06.255
$95 billion formula return,
716
00:36:06.255 --> 00:36:09.095
capital return on sales times assets, turnover.
717
00:36:09.435 --> 00:36:10.975
The assets turnover is only to your,
718
00:36:11.215 --> 00:36:13.375
remember it's six point something for DoorDash,
719
00:36:13.875 --> 00:36:17.175
but the e eeb as a percentage revenue is significantly
720
00:36:17.275 --> 00:36:21.375
higher, 8%, two times eight is 16%.
721
00:36:21.645 --> 00:36:24.095
It's not a 30% rose of DoorDash,
722
00:36:24.395 --> 00:36:26.295
but the company is profitable
723
00:36:26.795 --> 00:36:31.015
and the adjusted EBITDA represents 13% of revenues
724
00:36:31.235 --> 00:36:34.655
and pays four times the capital expenditures.
725
00:36:35.265 --> 00:36:38.215
Again, free cash flow, strongly positive.
726
00:36:38.925 --> 00:36:41.655
What do you do when you generate a free cash flow,
727
00:36:41.655 --> 00:36:44.815
which is positive, you can try to extend locally,
728
00:36:45.995 --> 00:36:50.575
but Mayan holds a market share in China, which is 65%.
729
00:36:51.405 --> 00:36:55.375
Alibaba is the other big competitor with its own site,
730
00:36:55.435 --> 00:36:57.375
la.com with 30%
731
00:36:57.395 --> 00:37:00.855
and the rest of the crowd including jdi jd.com,
732
00:37:00.915 --> 00:37:03.535
so JD taker web plus others 5%.
733
00:37:04.355 --> 00:37:06.255
So you understand that it's a op poll.
734
00:37:06.575 --> 00:37:08.655
A DU poll is generally speaking much better
735
00:37:08.675 --> 00:37:10.615
for the shareholders and for the clients,
736
00:37:11.075 --> 00:37:14.655
and this is why there are some conflicts locally in China
737
00:37:14.965 --> 00:37:16.455
with the competition authorities,
738
00:37:16.545 --> 00:37:18.415
which qualify the relationship
739
00:37:18.415 --> 00:37:21.175
between these different actors as irrational.
740
00:37:21.845 --> 00:37:25.575
They also have some difficulties with uh, people delivery,
741
00:37:25.575 --> 00:37:29.695
people dispute treatment of labor relation,
742
00:37:30.405 --> 00:37:32.375
same story as the rest of the crowd,
743
00:37:32.875 --> 00:37:36.815
but Maan is using its free cash flow to develop, to grow.
744
00:37:37.485 --> 00:37:38.855
They are based in Beijing
745
00:37:39.315 --> 00:37:41.335
and they decided to grow in Hong Kong.
746
00:37:41.485 --> 00:37:43.455
It's not that far a different distance.
747
00:37:43.595 --> 00:37:47.935
As Saudi Arabia in, they are exploiting their
748
00:37:48.475 --> 00:37:49.815
new software Keita
749
00:37:50.555 --> 00:37:54.535
and in Brazil in May this year, the company announced
750
00:37:54.535 --> 00:37:58.375
that they were going to invest $1 billion over the years
751
00:37:58.715 --> 00:37:59.775
in order to develop.
752
00:38:00.075 --> 00:38:01.935
You see the signing of the agreement
753
00:38:02.035 --> 00:38:04.055
and you have two presidents.
754
00:38:04.635 --> 00:38:06.535
You have the CEO of Maan
755
00:38:06.955 --> 00:38:09.015
and a little bit in the back you have the
756
00:38:09.015 --> 00:38:10.455
president of Brazil.
757
00:38:11.235 --> 00:38:15.295
So again, when we are discussing bricks, you have Brazil
758
00:38:16.235 --> 00:38:17.255
and you have China.
759
00:38:17.755 --> 00:38:19.255
The links are stronger.
760
00:38:19.955 --> 00:38:23.895
Bricks is not unless something which is valid on the
761
00:38:24.015 --> 00:38:26.055
international political relationship.
762
00:38:26.725 --> 00:38:29.335
It's also in the business, in the economics,
763
00:38:29.435 --> 00:38:31.375
and it is stronger and stronger.
764
00:38:32.155 --> 00:38:36.085
Now, if we go back to the acquisition of Deru by DoorDash,
765
00:38:36.595 --> 00:38:37.965
what is a rationality?
766
00:38:38.385 --> 00:38:40.005
Is it in synergies?
767
00:38:40.465 --> 00:38:43.005
Of course you can pull some R and D expenses.
768
00:38:43.365 --> 00:38:46.045
R and d is very much about software development,
769
00:38:46.195 --> 00:38:47.205
user experience,
770
00:38:47.275 --> 00:38:50.205
algorithm optimization, et cetera, et cetera.
771
00:38:50.945 --> 00:38:55.605
And DoorDash is spending 1.2 billion in 2024,
772
00:38:55.755 --> 00:38:58.965
including half a billion in stock based compensation.
773
00:38:59.385 --> 00:39:01.005
So you've tried to consider
774
00:39:01.075 --> 00:39:05.205
that maybe all these software developments can be amortized
775
00:39:05.705 --> 00:39:06.965
in the delivery business.
776
00:39:07.535 --> 00:39:10.045
There may be also some brand synergies.
777
00:39:10.585 --> 00:39:14.125
You are stronger, you are worldwide, your customers,
778
00:39:14.125 --> 00:39:16.165
they know you everywhere, et cetera.
779
00:39:16.515 --> 00:39:19.165
Synergies in terms of tangible fixed assets,
780
00:39:19.795 --> 00:39:22.685
it's a little bit discussion, property, plant and equipment.
781
00:39:22.825 --> 00:39:24.805
Now the infrastructure is quite local.
782
00:39:25.475 --> 00:39:30.005
Economies of scale, maybe shared services, maybe lobbying
783
00:39:30.965 --> 00:39:33.325
stronger means more effective lobbying.
784
00:39:33.585 --> 00:39:35.165
That's certainly a synergy,
785
00:39:36.065 --> 00:39:37.245
and so you can consider
786
00:39:37.355 --> 00:39:40.245
that it's maybe an offensive acquisition
787
00:39:40.395 --> 00:39:43.725
because of synergies, economies, scale, and all the like,
788
00:39:44.265 --> 00:39:47.565
but it's also probably a very strongly
789
00:39:48.315 --> 00:39:49.805
defensive acquisition.
790
00:39:50.505 --> 00:39:52.325
You have to control the field, you have
791
00:39:52.325 --> 00:39:53.645
to control the operations.
792
00:39:54.235 --> 00:39:57.285
Deliveroo is weak. There's a monopoly.
793
00:39:57.465 --> 00:39:58.965
The company's a perfect target,
794
00:39:59.425 --> 00:40:01.565
and your competitors are strong.
795
00:40:01.955 --> 00:40:05.965
They are extremely wealthy in terms of financial structure
796
00:40:06.435 --> 00:40:09.125
because they are generating plenty of free cash flows
797
00:40:09.125 --> 00:40:10.125
and they want to grow
798
00:40:10.195 --> 00:40:13.245
because they have plenty of assets which they can sell.
799
00:40:13.355 --> 00:40:14.445
They have plenty of cash.
800
00:40:14.745 --> 00:40:18.245
So you are confronting extremely powerful competitors
801
00:40:18.825 --> 00:40:22.285
and then in that case you have to eat, you have to grow.
802
00:40:22.515 --> 00:40:25.765
Otherwise you might be eaten by your competitors.
803
00:40:27.015 --> 00:40:27.805
Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to this educational film which is devoted to the very well known lo of jungle, which is eat or be eaten.
This food chain perspective is going to be illustrated by the acquisition of delivery by DoorDash, which industry It's about on demand delivery at large.
It's going to be about food from restaurants, about grocery, from supermarkets, grocery stores or whatsoever it's done by the bicycle or by drones flying everywhere.
And basically this is a very old business which has been massively disrupted by internet obviously and emergence of platforms on internet so that you can share the information and you can optimize the delivery itself.
Basically, it's one of the segments which have been Uberized with the name of Uber, as you know, and Uber Eats is a very important player in this business together with DoorDash.
DoorDash makes very important announcement on the 6th of May this year, the company is going to acquire delivery.
DoorDash is predominantly in North America.
Deliveroo is predominantly in Europe, so there won't be any major problem in terms of antitrust legislation.
The price is 2.9 billion sterling pounds because Deliveroo is listed on the London Stock Exchange, which represents about $3.9 billion and it's going to be paid in cash.
It's not a stock transaction, it's cash out, but it's not the only announcement made on 6th of May because DoorDash will make another acquisition whose name is seven rooms.
It has nothing to do with supply chain organization of the delivery clients or whatsoever.
It's about technology, it's about software, it's about online booking, so you understand that the company is growing, is investing quite a lot, and at the end of the day it's capitalizing on customer's portfolio together with user experience.
The price, which is going to be paid by DoorDash is $1.2 billion against in cash.
3.8, 3.9 plus 1.2 is about five point.
So saying no problem, the company had the monnet in the bank account.
The price which is going to be paid by DoorDash is 1.8 pounds.
It's about uh, 180 pe.
It shows a premium of 44% against the last stock price, and you see that on the graph immediately.
The stock price is going to adjust to 180 minus a time lag between the moment the announcement is made and the moment it's going to be actually packed.
Though the markets are absolutely validating it's going to work.
There will be no problem in the antitrust legislation and authorities management and basically there will be no counter offer from competitors.
This is another story DoorDash was created in 2013.
The first name is palo alto delivery.com and it's going to be created by people living around Palo Alto.
Students at the University of Stanford whose names are respectively, Mr.
Sue, Mr.
Tang and Mr.
Fong.
So you probably imagine where they come from.
The company is going to be immediately accepted by this fantastic and very well-known accelerator, which is Y Combinator.
Y Combinator is providing services against equity.
They're going to take 7% of equity and it's going to be immediately renamed DoorDash a few years later.
In 2018, the number one in the US market is grab her.
I will discuss a little bit later.
Number two, DoorDash and number three, Uber Eats.
So this is quite successful and it is so successful as the year after in 2019.
Now DoorDash is number one with a market share of 28% in the United States.
United States is about 95% of the revenues of DoorDash.
This is why in 2020 using, if I may say COVID and the momentum behind COVID, the company is going to be listed initial public offering in 2020, it's going to be a success.
Why? Because DoorDash is a commercial success.
The company is skyrocketing in terms of revenues and because of COVID.
COVID created an opportunity for companies like DoorDash, like Zoom because it was the ability to keep on running the business and have a normal quote, life without too much interacting between people.
The IPO takes place in 2020 in December, but in June the company made its last offer in terms of private equity issue of shares, private series H, and at that time, the premo evaluation of the company is just a little bit beyond $15 billion.
In December, the IPO is going to evaluate the company at $71 billion.
It's tremendous increase in six months time.
The price which is offered for the IPO is $102 per share.
The opening price is going to be 182, but the market likes very much a company.
Then there will be some fluctuations during this day and the closing price is going to be 189.5.
So this is definitely a tremendous success as far as capital markets are concerned.
If you look at the evolution of the revenues of DoorDash, you have the commercial success.
Skyrocketing growth is absolutely huge.
You remember what I said in 20 18, 20 19, the market share is about 30%.
It's going to grow from 28% to today, 67%, so two thirds of the American market are in the hands of DoorDash, which is huge growth.
Of course, you see the growth, which is a linear growth, but in relative terms it is slowing down quotes a little bit, but 2024 as opposed to 2023 shows an increase in the revenues by 25%.
When we compare that with delivery in a few minutes time, it's going to be a completely different story.
Now, the good news when you generate revenues and growing revenues is that you are going to generate economies of scale.
Costs are fixed, variable jury speaking, a little bit semi fixed and semi variable.
The good news is when your revenues are growing and your costs are growing in absolute terms, but at a rate which is less than the growth in the revenues, and then you increase your cost by in absolute terms, but relative to revenues, it's down and it's a very nice way to reach breakeven and operating profitability.
DoorDash is providing some information about its operating expenses.
First we have the cost of sales, the cost of delivering, the cost of producing the goods and services which are sold to the customer.
It first goes down and then it stabilizes once in infrastructure is set.
That's the way it works.
General and admin is down gradually down because you need less people per dollar.
Of course, if you need one accountant to account for a certain level of revenue, if you multiply by two the revenue generated by the company, you don't need two accountants.
You are going to generate economies of scale, so you need 1.7, 1.8.
You increase the number of people working in a general and admin, but relative to revenue is down gradually down.
Interestingly, research and development, very often you have a kind of two phases.
The first one is you start running the business.
You have massively invested in research and development to be a market leader, and then you start amortizing your research and development.
That's absolutely fair.
You generate economies of scale, but then you are the leader.
You have fantastic market share and you want to remain at the head of the market.
Then what do you have to do? You have to invest in innovation in order to improve your algorithm, in order to improve your optimization user experience and things like that.
This is why sometimes it stabilizes and goes up again or stabilizes and is plus minus, but you have to keep on investing in innovation if you want to remain the leader.
That's about the investment together with the capital expenditures, which are a consequence of growing the revenue.
Interestingly, there's a cost item which is very often generating massive economies of scale.
It sits on marketing, very simple reason at first, you attract customers, so you have to pay for the customer acquisition cost and it's going to cost you quite a lot of money, but then once the customers love your product, you don't have to acquire them anymore, you have to retain them, and the retention costs are always much more work than the acquisition cost and this is why the company is generating as any successful company in terms of client attractiveness, lot of economies of scale.
This will have an impact on the operating profit.
Now, the consequence of generating economies of scale in a growing company is that the profit, the operating profit is going to be up.
It's absolutely dramatic at the beginning of the period and then what's going to happen 2020 when the company goes public, we are close to breakeven.
The EBITDA is not positive, the EBIT is not positive, but the adjusted EBITDA is just a breakeven.
You remember that the difference between EBIT and EBITDA is deci precision and amortization, which is a non-cash item, but when you calculate your ebitda, the accounting authorities, they ask you to take into account the stock based compensation, restricted stock units, stock options and so on so forth to treat that as an operating expenses in the calculation of the ebitda, they are expense, but these are non cash items, but at the end of the day, if you want to calculate a kind of really cash operating profit, it's going to be adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA is a breakeven in 2020, in 21, and in 22 in 23 it's going to dramatically go up and in 24 it's up and if you look at the first semester of 25, again, it's up.
Interestingly, the EBITDA taking into account stock-based compensation is going to go to breakeven in 2023 and the EBIT is going to BRE even in 2024.
So you understand that there is a momentum and a momentum is you increase the return on sales dramatically each and every year.
The other point is are you able with your profit to finance your growth when you grow, you have to invest in capital expenditures.
It's not only property, plant and equipment, it's also software development, capitalized software development, and then you invest.
What's going to happen at DoorDash, CapEx is down at the very beginning.
You have to build infrastructure and then progressively capital expenditures are going to be down.
Again, not in absolute terms, but relative to revenues.
Now, if you look at the graph, capital expenditures are down as a percentage to revenues, four, 3%, something like that.
In the meantime, while CapEx is down, adjusted a bit dies up.
So interestingly, adjusted EBITDA is at breakeven in 20, 21, 22, but it does not pay the CapEx.
You can calculate EBITDA minus CapEx.
Now, I prefer to calculate EBITDA divided by capital expenditures.
How many times you pay your capital expenditures with your cash operating profit and interestingly it's going to become more than one, so ebitda definitely paying the capital expenditures in 2023 and it's going to go up in 2024.
Then the capital is generating an adjusted ebitda.
Again, cash operating profit, which pays five times the capital expenditures, but you understand that you have an extremely virtual circle now because you generate a free cash flow, which is positive, you don't have to visit your shareholders each and every year to accumulate equity in order to pay for the losses and in order to pay for the capital expenditures, the gross, and that's very important because if you are free, cash flow is positive.
What do you do with the money? There are two alternatives.
You retain and invest your returns.
That's what we are going to observe for delivery if few financial metrics about the balance sheet of DoorDash balance sheet, you remember the accounting statements assets on the one hand, equity and liabilities on the other hand, we find those people, we transform that into capital employed net operating assets and net financial resources.
The net operating assets are predominantly made of long term assets and working capital requirements.
Long-term assets is about 4.6 billion out of which you have a little bit of property plant and equipment obviously, but you have some goodwill and intangible assets which are very much a consequence of acquisitions.
It's 2.8 billion, so 4.6 is 2.8 plus 1.8.
It is about again, property, plant and equipment.
The working capital requirement is made of in factories plus accounts receivable minus everything which is payable to operating stakeholders.
There's no in factor discount business, it's pure service.
Now you have some accounts with receiv well, but what is due to the stakeholders, the restaurants, the grocery stores, the dashers represent 2.2 billion.
This is why the working character requirement is strongly negative by 3 billion.
Interestingly, when you grow you have to finance your capital expenditures, but you also have to find out the growth in your working capital requirement, but when it's negative, if you grow, it's even more negative.
The consequence is that the working capital requirement increase in absolute term is going to be a resource and not a use of funds.
Now, 4.6 minus three is 1.6.
This is cap employed.
In front of that you have the net financial resources, a contribution of investors as a financing as a company.
It's made of shareholders and financial creditors.
Shareholders equity is 7.8, so it's much more than 1.6.
Why? Because a net financial that the financial, that net of cash is strongly a negative.
In fact, the company has much more cash than debt.
Cash is exceeding debt by more than 6 billion.
This is why when you do your shopping and you pay 5 billion, the money is in the bank account.
Interestingly, shareholders equity is a contribution and the assets owned by the shareholders in the company, if I may say it's made of capital, additional paid capital and accumulated retain earnings, but retain earnings might be negative, especially when the company is starting its operations.
Now if you take the example of DoorDash, shareholders equity is about 13.1 billion invested by the shareholders in the company before the company is listed, the debt company is listed minus the losses which were AC accumulated by the company in the first years of operations, which represent $5.3 billion.
Of course, 7.8 minus 6.2 is 1.6.
Net financial resources are matching with capital employed.
This is accounting.
Now, this was a balance sheet.
Let's have a look at the profit and loss statement.
Revenues in 20 24, 10 0.7 billion.
Now if you divide the revenues by the capital employed, you get the assets turnover, the asset productivity, which we use in the DuPont and move formula.
You remember, return capital is how much you make when you sell, but applied by how many times you generate revenues equivalent to invested capital assets to an over a 6.7, which is 10.7 divided by 1.6.
Return on sales in 2024 is near the return.
Capital is nearly obviously, but first semester 2025, the return on sales is 5%.
If you multiply 5%, assuming that it's going to be the return sales for the whole year by the assets turnover, which is more than six, you get the return capital, which is going to be more than 30%.
Then the company is by far paying its cost of capital.
The company is generating a positive economic profit.
The performance is positive.
The growth or the value, which is a value of what you transport from the point of sale to the delivery is $47 billion.
Interestingly, the adjusted EBITDA during the first semester again is one point 25 billion.
If you divide one by the other, you get an EBITDA adjusted divided by growth order value, which is 2.6%.
It's service.
It's not huge margins but with a very high asset turnover, it can give you a return capital, which is extremely good and by far exceeding the weighted average cost of capital.
Now, what is a consequence of that story and those matrix on the usual stock price, the companies listed on stock exchange in December 20.
This is absolutely a success, but then there will be a post COVID period which is going to be dramatic for a number of companies and NASDAQ is down and DoorDash is very much down.
It's going to get to a low point in 2022 at about 50 from 200 down to 50, and then the NASDAQ is up and then DoorDash is up.
The market capitalization of the company.
The date is listed is you remember $71 billion.
Today it's more than 110 billion, so there is a kind of additional market value added for the company, which is $40 billion.
So it has been a good deal for the investors.
It's about value creation.
Why do you create value? Not because you are growing but because your growth is performing.
Now you observe that their revenues were growing and the return capital employed, which was 0% in 2024 is now more than 30%, so it's not gross against profitability, it's growth for profitability, and then you are going to accelerate your profitability with a growth in your revenues.
Again, it's about economies and scale, which is a perfect story for a company and that is about profitable.
When you're experiencing and generating a profitable growth, you create value.
Then if you want to calculate, observe the value which is created a stock market, there are different ratios.
One which I very much use is a market to book, which is a price value divided by capital employed.
The price value is market capital debt and capital employed is the amount of money you invest in your business operations, but capital employed is not that relevant for this kind of business because it's quite low.
It's not very much capital intensive by far.
Sometimes you can use a price to book, so you take the market cap divided by the book equity, but in the book equity you have not only what was invested by the shareholders, but also you have a few things like treasury stock, like losses, exactly for DoorDash, but what I prefer is to calculate the price to capital.
Capital is what was invested by the shareholders throughout the years and you remember it is 13.1.
Now the value is 111.
If you divide 111 by 13.1, you get 8.5, which means that on the average, each and every dollar invested by the shareholders in the company was multiplied by 8.5.
This is value creation and this is a perfect consistency between performance, growth and value.
This does not go without a little bit of legal issues, which were always observed as far as Uberization processes were observed.
One is about labor relations, employee status.
Are they employed of the company? Are they independent? Don't you understand that in terms of social security and a few things like that, it might have an importance remuneration.
Is there any minimum remuneration? What about the ties? What about the tips? How are they shared within the company, et cetera.
Plenty of problem cartel antitrust, GrubHub and Uber is and DoorDash are dominant on the US market and the antitrust authorities consider that.
It's not exactly fair the way the companies are running the business.
Sometimes DoorDash is accused of registering restaurants again, their will and then misappropriating orders.
There is a very interesting example of a restaurant which did not want to be registered by DoorDash.
It was registered by DoorDash on the platform of the company and when the clients they wanted to order something from the restaurants, DoorDash will say, no, no, it's too far from where you live, but by the way, we have another restaurant which is much closer to where you live and now they were redirecting the orders from the restaurant, which did not want to be DoorDash register into another restaurant which was paying the fees for DoorDash.
It's absolutely illegal.
It was also about illegal sales of data, et cetera, et cetera.
You know that Uber, DoorDash, et cetera, they are not exactly um appropriate in terms of compliance with legal issues.
Now, the target deliver story, the company starting 2013 is starting in United States.
It is in Europe.
United Arab ate a little bit in Asia through Singapore and Hong Kong.
Do you understand? There is absolutely no overlap in terms of business.
The DoorDash buys delivery is not going to change the competition in Europe, so no problem.
The competitors are just e takeaway and Uber Eats.
In 2021, the company is listed.
You remember it was 24 DoorDash and the IPO stock price offer is 3.9 starting pounds, but it's not going to be as nice as DoorDash because now the stock price is closing at 2.84, so it's not going to be a success on an IPO point of view.
They will have the same comparable legal problems, legal relation, antitrust and so on and so forth.
They have even a client.
There is even a problem which had not been experienced likely by DoorDash.
One day a deliverable client is beaten.
Um, it's not very good in terms of uh, UX and things like that.
Now, the market share for DoorDash in the US is 68% for uk, France and Italy, which has dominant markets of deliver because of competition.
The market share is around 30%, but you understand that you have to fight against big players and if you want to fight, you have to attract customers.
If you want to attract customers, you have to improve the Euro experience and then you have to invest.
What about the revenues generated by deliver skyrocketing? A nice increase Today it's about 2 billion.
It's not the same size as 10 billion, but it's not the same geography as well.
But what is very interesting is that if you look at the last three years, growth is out of the picture.
It was a little bit closer to zero positive in 2022 and it's near in 23 and 24.
Do you understand that growth is really an issue for the company? This is when the last presentation made to the financial analysis.
The company says, oh, orders are back to growth.
Outstanding growth.
The number of orders growing by 2%.
The gross order value, the value of what you are delivering is increased by 6%.
So if the gross order value is up by 6% and the number of orders are by 2%, it means that the value of what you are delivering is up by 4%, but the company mentions in a small line that the 4% is definitely inflation.
So what is growing your revenues is not really what people are buying, using your service and so on and so forth.
It's just inflation, which is growing the revenues, which is absolutely not recommended.
Of course a company generated the column is a scale and could reduce the cost per the company does not say very much about the indirect cost.
You remember for DoorDash, we have displays sales and marketing, we have general admin, R and d and so on so forth.
As far as delivery is concerned, we just have cost of sales and the other indirect cost, it's down and it's stabilizing for a very simple reason, which is the company is not growing.
So you can improve your productivity, reducing your cost.
It's going to improve a little bit the picture, but it's not very much the increase in the revenues, which is reducing your cost per revenue.
When you observe the evolution of EBIT ebitda, an adjusted ebitda, you have roughly less the same track.
So it's very strongly negative at the very beginning of the period for Deliveroo as it was for DoorDash and you are progressively getting to break even, but it's much slower and when you look at the evolution, you are EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA breakeven in online 23 and 24 is just a little bit positive, but definitely it's not the same cost structure.
It's not the same return on sales.
So you understand that for DoorDash, the momentum is up for delivery.
The momentum is a little bit more stable.
Now, when you make a profit, you transform this profit into cash flow.
You are a bid die positive, adjusted or not, and you have to pay your capital expenditures and you have to finance your working capital requirement.
The good news is a working capital requirement is negative for delivery and for DoorDash, no problem.
It's essential.
It is kind of business and then you are going to generate a positive EBITDA minus CapEx.
Then your free cash flow is positive when you generate a positive free cash flow.
What do you do with the money you retain and invest your return? And then OO is very proud to announce that in 2024 it's a first year of positive free cash flow.
And what do they do with Monet? They buy back their share.
They don't pay dividends because they accumulated plenty of losses, so they're returning the cash to the shareholders.
More than 100 million starting pound in 2024.
When the company is announcing the outlook in terms of growth and ebitda, the company is saying, oh, we are back to growth ball, single digit, high single digit, but single digit adjusted EBITDA is going to increase, but if you increase the EBITDA in order to increase the return to the shareholders, it's not extremely bright in terms of future for the company.
When you benchmark the operating profit generated by DoorDash and deliver, interestingly it's quite the same.
If you look at the EBIT itself, quite same level of operat income.
Now they are breakeven in 2024, but there is no dramatic difference.
The difference is in the adjusted ebitda, DoorDash wins by a very wide margin against Deliveroo and then what does Deliveroo do with its ebitda? It returns the cash.
What does DoorDash do with ebitda? It invests.
That's a completely different philosophy.
Now let's try to correlate that with the original stock price.
You remember what I said with DoorDash, fantastic IPO then down stabilization up.
What about the competitors? The competitors are Deliveroo obviously, which is down and remains down.
Oh, it's up during the last weeks.
Why? Because DoorDash is making an offer, but without the offer of DoorDash it would remain flat.
Maan in China, same story, just a takeaway, same story.
The only winner in terms of shareholder value creation over the long term is definitely DoorDash.
And now if you compare the stock market trajectories of all these companies, you understand that for the period DoorDash is plus 50% deliver roof and Mayan eight minus 60.
Of course for deliver its minus 60 plus 20 because of the offer made by DoorDash, but without the offer it would have been minus 60 delivery hero just in takeaway minus 80.
So you understand that the one and unique company which is creating value for its shareholders is by far DoorDash, as I just said, DoorDash has competitors.
Deliveroo, we already discussed delivery Hero, just e takeaway and may try.
Let's take a few minutes to discuss these competitors and their respective power delivery hero is a tremendous revenue growth, tremendous success in a commercial point of view.
Now, the company we started from very low a few years ago is now at more than 12 billion euros of turnover.
Global prisons, Europe, middle East and North Africa, Asia, Americas, north America, Latin America.
The company is still generating losses, but the company is now positive in terms of free cash flow generation.
So the company is generating these economies of scale, which are not high enough to reach break even, but the company is very big, is very successful, and now is not consuming cash anymore, which makes the company much more powerful in the competitive game process.
Uh, process was not on the list.
Process was indirectly on the list.
The company has been created from Naspers, which is a very big investor in South Africa.
Nasper decided to list separately on the Amsterdam stock exchange its investment arm, which was named process and now Naspers has 73.1% of process.
Definitely the controlling interest by far process is very well known for its equity stake in Tencent today.
The company holds 23.5% of Tencent.
It was 45% in 2001, so it was in the early league of the shareholders and founders of the company, which was a tremendous success.
Today, the value of the 23.5% is still holding in Tencent is $155 billion.
Interestingly, when you look at the market capitalization of process, it's less, it's about $130 billion.
So you understand that the stock market capitalization of the company is much less at this net asset value.
You have at least one asset which is worth significantly more than the value of all the assets in the other assets held by process.
You have 28% of delivery.
Hello, you have 4% of MA value in the delivery business.
Again, you have 100% of food which is based in Brazil.
Same business.
Same business.
Wiggy in India, which was recently listed, the company holds 25%.
So the company is very much in a global presence and is a significant players through different equity stakes.
Interestingly, a few years ago in 2020 process wanted to buy, just eat for 5.5 billion pounds and in fact just it was acquired by takeaway and it became just eat takeaway in 2021, just eat takeaway bought GrubHub for $7.3 billion.
You remember the one which was number one when DoorDash was only number two, but GrubHub was a disaster and what was acquired in 21 for $7.3 billion is sold by Jesse Takeaway in 2024 for only $650 million.
It's a dramatic loss.
Then interestingly now process is by just in takeaway for $4.3 billion, so much less than what was paid by just takeaway to buy GrubHub.
That's a terrible story.
So processes buying just a takeaway, which is a significant shareholder of delivery Herald, that's going to be a problem and this is why in order to get the agreement from the antitrust authorities at the level of Europe, there will be partial or total sale of the delivery hero stake held by process.
We'll see how it works, but you understand that process is an extremely strong company.
They want cash to sell a few Tencent shares.
So there the company has about $18 billion of cash in the bank account.
It's a considerable financial power.
Interestingly, the company was created in South Africa, but the company is in Brazil.
Haifu, the company is in India, Sweden, the company is in China, Mayan, and now the company is in Europe with just a takeaway and delivery hero.
Maybe, maybe not.
If you combine Brazil, India and China and South Africa, you get something which is a little bit of the bricks 'cause this is definitely a bricks company excluding Russia.
If you look at May one now, may one was created in 2010 by a gentleman who is still there, CEO of the company, Wong Singh.
This is also a big player, 2024 market capitalization, $95 billion formula return, capital return on sales times assets, turnover.
The assets turnover is only to your, remember it's six point something for DoorDash, but the e eeb as a percentage revenue is significantly higher, 8%, two times eight is 16%.
It's not a 30% rose of DoorDash, but the company is profitable and the adjusted EBITDA represents 13% of revenues and pays four times the capital expenditures.
Again, free cash flow, strongly positive.
What do you do when you generate a free cash flow, which is positive, you can try to extend locally, but Mayan holds a market share in China, which is 65%.
Alibaba is the other big competitor with its own site, la.com with 30% and the rest of the crowd including jdi jd.com, so JD taker web plus others 5%.
So you understand that it's a op poll.
A DU poll is generally speaking much better for the shareholders and for the clients, and this is why there are some conflicts locally in China with the competition authorities, which qualify the relationship between these different actors as irrational.
They also have some difficulties with uh, people delivery, people dispute treatment of labor relation, same story as the rest of the crowd, but Maan is using its free cash flow to develop, to grow.
They are based in Beijing and they decided to grow in Hong Kong.
It's not that far a different distance.
As Saudi Arabia in, they are exploiting their new software Keita and in Brazil in May this year, the company announced that they were going to invest $1 billion over the years in order to develop.
You see the signing of the agreement and you have two presidents.
You have the CEO of Maan and a little bit in the back you have the president of Brazil.
So again, when we are discussing bricks, you have Brazil and you have China.
The links are stronger.
Bricks is not unless something which is valid on the international political relationship.
It's also in the business, in the economics, and it is stronger and stronger.
Now, if we go back to the acquisition of Deru by DoorDash, what is a rationality? Is it in synergies? Of course you can pull some R and D expenses.
R and d is very much about software development, user experience, algorithm optimization, et cetera, et cetera.
And DoorDash is spending 1.2 billion in 2024, including half a billion in stock based compensation.
So you've tried to consider that maybe all these software developments can be amortized in the delivery business.
There may be also some brand synergies.
You are stronger, you are worldwide, your customers, they know you everywhere, et cetera.
Synergies in terms of tangible fixed assets, it's a little bit discussion, property, plant and equipment.
Now the infrastructure is quite local.
Economies of scale, maybe shared services, maybe lobbying stronger means more effective lobbying.
That's certainly a synergy, and so you can consider that it's maybe an offensive acquisition because of synergies, economies, scale, and all the like, but it's also probably a very strongly defensive acquisition.
You have to control the field, you have to control the operations.
Deliveroo is weak.
There's a monopoly.
The company's a perfect target, and your competitors are strong.
They are extremely wealthy in terms of financial structure because they are generating plenty of free cash flows and they want to grow because they have plenty of assets which they can sell.
They have plenty of cash.
So you are confronting extremely powerful competitors and then in that case you have to eat, you have to grow.
Otherwise you might be eaten by your competitors.
Thank you very much.