Accounting for entrepreneurs, module 3 // Purchase of a machine, Progress Report
WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.900 --> 00:00:03.700
We Stand now at the end of the third module
2
00:00:03.700 --> 00:00:07.000
out of 5 of this course accounting
3
00:00:06.300 --> 00:00:08.800
for business operations
4
00:00:10.100 --> 00:00:14.400
During two modules. We have simply sold products
5
00:00:13.400 --> 00:00:16.400
which we had purchased from
6
00:00:16.400 --> 00:00:17.200
A supplier.
7
00:00:18.100 --> 00:00:22.100
But in the third module, I have introduced a very significant
8
00:00:21.100 --> 00:00:25.400
degree of complexity by creating
9
00:00:24.400 --> 00:00:28.100
our own manufacturing footprint.
10
00:00:29.300 --> 00:00:32.300
The reason why I think now that it's
11
00:00:32.300 --> 00:00:35.800
very important to take a step back at the
12
00:00:35.800 --> 00:00:38.500
end of these first 10 months of business
13
00:00:38.500 --> 00:00:41.600
operations so that we can get back
14
00:00:41.600 --> 00:00:44.500
to the fundamental contributions of this
15
00:00:44.500 --> 00:00:44.800
course.
16
00:00:45.700 --> 00:00:49.000
I truly believe that there are four fundamental
17
00:00:48.700 --> 00:00:51.300
contributions. We have to Deep dive in
18
00:00:51.300 --> 00:00:54.700
the first one constant from module 1
19
00:00:54.700 --> 00:00:57.700
to module 3 change in cash is
20
00:00:57.700 --> 00:01:00.800
not profit. There is a significant difference
21
00:01:00.800 --> 00:01:03.400
and there are many reasons why which I
22
00:01:03.400 --> 00:01:05.200
am going to detail a little bit later on.
23
00:01:06.100 --> 00:01:09.300
The second contribution is we have accounted for
24
00:01:09.300 --> 00:01:12.600
business operations. And what is very important
25
00:01:12.600 --> 00:01:16.000
to understand is that it's a process which is very stable
26
00:01:15.300 --> 00:01:18.900
robust mechanism. It's
27
00:01:18.900 --> 00:01:21.200
always the same story and it
28
00:01:21.200 --> 00:01:23.500
works very well and it's reliable.
29
00:01:25.100 --> 00:01:26.100
third contribution
30
00:01:26.800 --> 00:01:29.800
accounting is about producing numbers
31
00:01:29.800 --> 00:01:32.200
but financial analysis is
32
00:01:32.200 --> 00:01:36.400
not about reading numbers and making simple calculations. It
33
00:01:35.400 --> 00:01:38.700
goes much Beyond this very
34
00:01:38.700 --> 00:01:41.500
simple activity. And again, I
35
00:01:41.500 --> 00:01:42.300
will detail that.
36
00:01:43.300 --> 00:01:46.600
Last but not least the force contribution is something I
37
00:01:46.600 --> 00:01:50.300
repeatedly said during the stream modules growth
38
00:01:49.300 --> 00:01:52.800
is a very ambiguous process. Is
39
00:01:52.800 --> 00:01:55.200
it economic performance? Of course, it's
40
00:01:55.200 --> 00:01:58.800
great because it's value creation for the customer. But what
41
00:01:58.800 --> 00:02:01.500
are the potential negative impacts of
42
00:02:01.500 --> 00:02:01.900
growth?
43
00:02:03.100 --> 00:02:06.800
The first contribution is that definitely profit does
44
00:02:06.800 --> 00:02:09.600
not match with cash. There are
45
00:02:09.600 --> 00:02:12.800
plenty of reasons, but I developed four key
46
00:02:12.800 --> 00:02:14.600
reasons why they don't match.
47
00:02:15.200 --> 00:02:18.700
The first one is a concept whose name is operating working capital
48
00:02:18.700 --> 00:02:21.000
requirement. Which comes from what?
49
00:02:21.700 --> 00:02:24.500
First there's a time lag between the
50
00:02:24.500 --> 00:02:27.400
moment you account for a revenue and the moment
51
00:02:27.400 --> 00:02:30.600
you cash from sales. There's a timelap
52
00:02:30.600 --> 00:02:33.700
between the moment you purchase you can't
53
00:02:33.700 --> 00:02:37.000
for expenses and you pay your suppliers. This
54
00:02:36.200 --> 00:02:39.400
is why because of this time lag
55
00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:42.900
you account for accounts receivable. You can't for accounts
56
00:02:42.900 --> 00:02:45.500
payable and the end of the day cash and
57
00:02:45.500 --> 00:02:48.700
profits are not the same. There's a third
58
00:02:48.700 --> 00:02:51.900
reason why which is about inventories and
59
00:02:51.900 --> 00:02:54.500
it is calculated in the operating working
60
00:02:54.500 --> 00:02:57.300
capital requirement. In fact, there is is
61
00:02:57.300 --> 00:03:01.300
Cash in a warehouse, but it's not profit you
62
00:03:00.300 --> 00:03:04.000
need inventories because there is uncertainty
63
00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:06.000
on the demand there is maybe
64
00:03:06.500 --> 00:03:09.500
a lack of flexibility in the manufacturing footprint, but that
65
00:03:09.500 --> 00:03:12.500
the end of the day it's cash. It's no profit
66
00:03:12.500 --> 00:03:13.900
not yet profit.
67
00:03:14.500 --> 00:03:17.700
Then operating working capital requirement, which is inventories
68
00:03:17.700 --> 00:03:20.700
plus receivables minus payables is definitely
69
00:03:20.700 --> 00:03:23.900
the reason why at first profits
70
00:03:23.900 --> 00:03:26.500
and cash do not match you remember
71
00:03:26.500 --> 00:03:29.500
funds from operations is a bit duck
72
00:03:29.500 --> 00:03:32.300
profit minus changing the
73
00:03:32.300 --> 00:03:36.000
operating working capital requirement and six difference
74
00:03:35.500 --> 00:03:38.600
between profit and cash is definitely
75
00:03:38.600 --> 00:03:41.800
first operating working capital requirement
76
00:03:41.800 --> 00:03:42.300
change.
77
00:03:43.100 --> 00:03:46.700
But there are some other reasons you remember in a
78
00:03:46.700 --> 00:03:49.500
module 3. We are in April and we buy a
79
00:03:49.500 --> 00:03:52.800
machine and we start depreciating. I told you that the
80
00:03:52.800 --> 00:03:55.900
investment itself is a cash flow, but the
81
00:03:55.900 --> 00:03:58.300
depreciation is not a cash flow. It is
82
00:03:58.300 --> 00:04:01.500
a cost. It is a conception. It is a usage of the machine the
83
00:04:01.500 --> 00:04:04.200
progressive usage of the machine. So it is a
84
00:04:04.200 --> 00:04:07.900
non-cash expense, which is absolutely fundamental to
85
00:04:07.900 --> 00:04:10.500
take into account in the calculation of the production
86
00:04:10.500 --> 00:04:10.900
cost.
87
00:04:11.700 --> 00:04:14.300
This is a non-cash expense. This is
88
00:04:14.300 --> 00:04:17.700
in the profit but it's not cash second difference.
89
00:04:17.700 --> 00:04:20.500
There are some other non-cash expense. For
90
00:04:20.500 --> 00:04:23.100
example, if you receive stock options, it's going to
91
00:04:23.100 --> 00:04:26.800
show in a p&l as labor related expenses, but
92
00:04:26.800 --> 00:04:30.000
it's no cash out for the company even when
93
00:04:29.400 --> 00:04:31.300
it is exercised.
94
00:04:32.900 --> 00:04:35.200
Third reason let's go back to
95
00:04:35.200 --> 00:04:39.100
the machine. It's an investment. It's a cash outflow, but
96
00:04:38.100 --> 00:04:41.300
it's a cash out flow, which is not an expense.
97
00:04:41.300 --> 00:04:44.800
It will generate revenues an income
98
00:04:44.800 --> 00:04:47.800
in the future because you are going to generate cost savings.
99
00:04:47.800 --> 00:04:51.000
It's going to show in a p&l but later but the
100
00:04:50.100 --> 00:04:53.200
moment you account for the investment. It has
101
00:04:53.200 --> 00:04:56.400
absolutely no impact in a p&l the moment
102
00:04:56.400 --> 00:04:59.500
you start depreciating the investment. It has
103
00:04:59.500 --> 00:05:03.100
an impact on the p&l but it's not the capital expenditures itself
104
00:05:02.100 --> 00:05:04.300
as a cash outlay.
105
00:05:05.500 --> 00:05:08.500
Same story for the financing financing is Cash in but
106
00:05:08.500 --> 00:05:11.500
it's not an income. It's not a revenue and it's
107
00:05:11.500 --> 00:05:12.200
not an expense.
108
00:05:12.900 --> 00:05:15.800
When you convince the banker to provide funds so
109
00:05:15.800 --> 00:05:18.200
that you can Finance at least part of the
110
00:05:18.200 --> 00:05:21.700
purchase price of the machine. This is an inflow,
111
00:05:21.700 --> 00:05:24.500
but it does nothing to do with selling goods and
112
00:05:24.500 --> 00:05:27.400
services. So it should not be in the p&l. It
113
00:05:27.400 --> 00:05:30.500
is in the balance sheet. It is in a cash flow statement. It's
114
00:05:30.500 --> 00:05:31.300
not a profit.
115
00:05:32.300 --> 00:05:35.400
It was the same story by the way in module 1 when we
116
00:05:35.400 --> 00:05:38.600
created the company, we provided the cash
117
00:05:38.600 --> 00:05:41.500
account of the company with capital. It was cash.
118
00:05:41.500 --> 00:05:44.600
It was capital and we had not yet
119
00:05:44.600 --> 00:05:47.500
started the business operations. We had not
120
00:05:47.500 --> 00:05:50.500
yet started selling anything, but it was cash
121
00:05:50.500 --> 00:05:51.800
and it was financing.
122
00:05:52.300 --> 00:05:56.400
You understand that there are many reasons including four
123
00:05:55.400 --> 00:05:58.400
key factors, why profit and
124
00:05:58.400 --> 00:06:01.000
cash they definitely don't match.
125
00:06:02.500 --> 00:06:03.500
so on point
126
00:06:04.200 --> 00:06:07.900
these three statements are perfectly integrated.
127
00:06:07.900 --> 00:06:11.000
You remember we first build the p&l
128
00:06:10.200 --> 00:06:13.600
the income statement revenues less
129
00:06:13.600 --> 00:06:16.500
cost in parallel. We have a second film
130
00:06:16.500 --> 00:06:19.900
which is accounting for cash inflows and
131
00:06:19.900 --> 00:06:20.400
outflows.
132
00:06:21.400 --> 00:06:24.700
Which is very interesting is that there is an interaction between period and
133
00:06:24.700 --> 00:06:27.100
cash for example accounts receivable.
134
00:06:27.700 --> 00:06:30.300
You have the accounts receivable at the beginning of the month. What
135
00:06:30.300 --> 00:06:33.200
is due from your customers? What do you
136
00:06:33.200 --> 00:06:36.800
add a p&l item revenues? What
137
00:06:36.800 --> 00:06:40.000
do you deduct the cash collection
138
00:06:39.300 --> 00:06:42.500
from sales? What do you get at the
139
00:06:42.500 --> 00:06:45.400
end the accounts receivable at the end of the month which is going
140
00:06:45.400 --> 00:06:46.700
to show in the balancing.
141
00:06:47.300 --> 00:06:50.300
Through your understand that we are running to films in
142
00:06:50.300 --> 00:06:53.700
parallel. One is a p&l how much profit
143
00:06:53.700 --> 00:06:56.400
or loss do we generate out of selling goods
144
00:06:56.400 --> 00:06:59.300
and services. The second film
145
00:06:59.300 --> 00:07:02.300
is Cash in cash out. What is
146
00:07:02.300 --> 00:07:06.000
absolutely fascinating and integrated is
147
00:07:05.400 --> 00:07:08.400
out of these two films we end on the
148
00:07:08.400 --> 00:07:11.100
common picture which is a talented at
149
00:07:11.100 --> 00:07:14.700
the end of the period so we have two films to
150
00:07:14.700 --> 00:07:17.100
build a picture. This is a very
151
00:07:17.100 --> 00:07:19.400
well-oiled machine.
152
00:07:20.400 --> 00:07:23.200
You understand that we always do the same
153
00:07:23.200 --> 00:07:27.000
from module 1 to module three, I progressively introduced
154
00:07:26.800 --> 00:07:29.400
complexity but that we account
155
00:07:29.400 --> 00:07:32.500
for inventories. It's always the same thing when we account for
156
00:07:32.500 --> 00:07:36.000
accounts receivable. It's always the same thing when we account for net
157
00:07:35.500 --> 00:07:38.900
earnings more or less distributed more
158
00:07:38.900 --> 00:07:41.600
or less reinvested in a retain earnings. It's always
159
00:07:41.600 --> 00:07:44.700
the same thing though this mechanics. This
160
00:07:44.700 --> 00:07:47.600
machine is extremely robust and
161
00:07:47.600 --> 00:07:48.000
stable.
162
00:07:49.200 --> 00:07:52.800
One of the interesting consequence of that is
163
00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:56.100
the balance it always balances,
164
00:07:55.100 --> 00:07:57.200
whatever you do.
165
00:07:58.600 --> 00:08:01.800
Let's take four examples two business modifications
166
00:08:01.800 --> 00:08:03.200
and two mistakes.
167
00:08:04.200 --> 00:08:07.700
First you remember that we have decided to reinvest when
168
00:08:07.700 --> 00:08:10.600
her percent of the bottom line into retained earnings.
169
00:08:11.400 --> 00:08:14.300
Let's imagine that we change the dividend policy and we decided to
170
00:08:14.300 --> 00:08:15.300
distribute 50%
171
00:08:16.400 --> 00:08:19.500
What happens to the balance sheet it's going to be modified, but it
172
00:08:19.500 --> 00:08:20.000
will balance.
173
00:08:20.900 --> 00:08:23.400
Second modification you remember
174
00:08:23.400 --> 00:08:26.400
that we pay 50% of the purchases immediately and
175
00:08:26.400 --> 00:08:29.500
50% with a one month delay imagine that we've
176
00:08:29.500 --> 00:08:32.800
been able to convince our suppliers to pay one hundred
177
00:08:32.800 --> 00:08:35.600
percent of the purchases in one month instead
178
00:08:35.600 --> 00:08:38.000
of 50% What's going to
179
00:08:38.200 --> 00:08:41.900
happen to the balancy, but more interestingly. Let's imagine
180
00:08:41.900 --> 00:08:44.400
that we make a mistake. Oh in June
181
00:08:44.400 --> 00:08:47.700
we forgot to account for income tax the balance
182
00:08:47.700 --> 00:08:50.300
it will be wrong, but it's going to balance.
183
00:08:51.200 --> 00:08:54.400
Much more complex, imagine that in
184
00:08:54.400 --> 00:08:57.200
the calculation of the production cost. We forgot to account for
185
00:08:57.200 --> 00:09:01.300
the depreciation of the machine in the production costs calculation.
186
00:09:00.300 --> 00:09:03.500
The balance sheet will be wrong. The
187
00:09:03.500 --> 00:09:06.400
p&l will be wrong. But the balance sheet
188
00:09:06.400 --> 00:09:09.800
will balance. Let's have a look at these four situations one after
189
00:09:09.800 --> 00:09:10.300
the other.
190
00:09:11.100 --> 00:09:11.700
first one
191
00:09:12.500 --> 00:09:15.400
imagine that we decide to distribute 15% of
192
00:09:15.400 --> 00:09:20.500
the profit the net earnings in June were 12,886 50%
193
00:09:20.500 --> 00:09:24.100
of that is 6,443. If
194
00:09:23.100 --> 00:09:26.500
we decide at the end of June to distribute
195
00:09:26.500 --> 00:09:29.300
it if you don't to the shareholders will have to show that
196
00:09:29.300 --> 00:09:32.900
in the balance sheet. It's going to be dividend payable.
197
00:09:33.500 --> 00:09:36.200
It's decided in June. It's going to be Pat in July,
198
00:09:36.200 --> 00:09:37.200
August or whatsoever.
199
00:09:37.900 --> 00:09:40.400
But if we decide to distribute it
200
00:09:40.400 --> 00:09:43.500
if it done we are going to reinvest Less in
201
00:09:43.500 --> 00:09:46.400
the retained earnings. You remember that retainer. This
202
00:09:46.400 --> 00:09:48.400
is earnings minus dividends.
203
00:09:49.200 --> 00:09:52.600
So they retainer Nicks are going to be reduced by the amount
204
00:09:52.600 --> 00:09:55.500
of dividend which is going to be paid
205
00:09:55.500 --> 00:09:58.100
to the shareholders. And if you don't
206
00:09:58.100 --> 00:10:01.500
which is not going to be reinvested in the shareholders equity.
207
00:10:02.200 --> 00:10:06.500
So retainer earnings are down by 6,443 and
208
00:10:05.500 --> 00:10:10.100
dividends payable is by 6,443.
209
00:10:08.100 --> 00:10:12.000
The total balance.
210
00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:14.800
It is the same. There's plus something
211
00:10:14.800 --> 00:10:18.000
here and minus something there the
212
00:10:17.500 --> 00:10:19.200
balance it is balancing.
213
00:10:20.500 --> 00:10:23.000
Second situation in which the total balance it
214
00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:26.600
is modified, even though the balance of the balance sheet
215
00:10:26.600 --> 00:10:29.300
is preserved. You have negotiated with your
216
00:10:29.300 --> 00:10:32.400
suppliers to pay them 100% of the purchases in
217
00:10:32.400 --> 00:10:34.700
one month instead of 50%
218
00:10:35.600 --> 00:10:38.800
What is a consequence of the balance sheet the accounts
219
00:10:38.800 --> 00:10:41.900
payable figure is going to be very much incremented. It's
220
00:10:41.900 --> 00:10:44.300
no more 50% of the purchases. It's
221
00:10:44.300 --> 00:10:49.400
100% of the purchases now. It's 50,960 which
222
00:10:48.400 --> 00:10:51.400
is the entire purchases of the
223
00:10:51.400 --> 00:10:51.800
months.
224
00:10:52.700 --> 00:10:53.700
that the first point
225
00:10:54.600 --> 00:10:57.300
now what is a second impact on the balance sheet
226
00:10:57.300 --> 00:10:59.200
it will show on the asset side.
227
00:10:59.800 --> 00:11:02.800
Because if you have postponed the payment of the
228
00:11:02.800 --> 00:11:05.900
50% of the purchases, you used
229
00:11:05.900 --> 00:11:07.900
to pair to your suppliers before.
230
00:11:08.800 --> 00:11:11.200
Now this cash is in your pocket.
231
00:11:11.800 --> 00:11:14.400
So you have more cash in your bank account
232
00:11:14.400 --> 00:11:17.600
simply because you did not pay your suppliers
233
00:11:17.600 --> 00:11:20.100
by the amount of money which shows
234
00:11:20.100 --> 00:11:23.200
in your accounts payable at the end of the month. So you have
235
00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:26.700
more cash which exactly compensates more accounts
236
00:11:26.700 --> 00:11:27.300
payable.
237
00:11:28.400 --> 00:11:30.900
What is interesting in these two situations is?
238
00:11:31.700 --> 00:11:34.200
The first alternative is that the compensation is
239
00:11:34.200 --> 00:11:37.800
going to show in the same column either assets
240
00:11:37.800 --> 00:11:39.400
or equity and liabilities.
241
00:11:40.200 --> 00:11:43.800
You have more dividend payable and you have less retained
242
00:11:43.800 --> 00:11:46.700
earnings plus minus. The resulting
243
00:11:46.700 --> 00:11:49.200
impact is Neil and the total balance sheet
244
00:11:49.200 --> 00:11:52.800
Remains the Same Sergeant alternative the compensation in
245
00:11:52.800 --> 00:11:55.400
one column will show in the other column.
246
00:11:56.100 --> 00:11:59.600
Then you're going to compensate accounts payable and cash for
247
00:11:59.600 --> 00:12:02.200
example, but then the balance sheet is
248
00:12:02.200 --> 00:12:05.800
going to keep on balancing which is extremely predictable.
249
00:12:05.800 --> 00:12:08.200
But the total balance sheet
250
00:12:08.200 --> 00:12:11.500
is going to be affected by the change in
251
00:12:11.500 --> 00:12:13.500
the value of these items.
252
00:12:14.200 --> 00:12:17.300
Now the next two steps are quite interesting because we
253
00:12:17.300 --> 00:12:20.100
are going to make a mistake. The p&l is
254
00:12:20.100 --> 00:12:23.500
going to be wrong the balance it is going to be wrong. But the
255
00:12:23.500 --> 00:12:26.300
balance it will balance imagine for example
256
00:12:26.300 --> 00:12:29.400
that we made a mistake and we forgot to account for
257
00:12:29.400 --> 00:12:32.500
taxes in June. So there is
258
00:12:32.500 --> 00:12:35.400
no increment in income tax payable
259
00:12:35.400 --> 00:12:38.200
because what is missing is 20% of the earnings before
260
00:12:38.200 --> 00:12:41.400
tax generated by our activity in the month
261
00:12:41.400 --> 00:12:41.800
of June.
262
00:12:43.600 --> 00:12:46.400
If the income tax payable is down by the tax which
263
00:12:46.400 --> 00:12:49.800
disappeared you have generated more earnings after
264
00:12:49.800 --> 00:12:52.400
tax because earnings before tax
265
00:12:52.400 --> 00:12:55.300
and the earnings after tax now and it's wrong
266
00:12:55.300 --> 00:12:56.100
are the same.
267
00:12:56.900 --> 00:12:59.500
You have not reduced the retainer earnings
268
00:12:59.500 --> 00:13:02.600
by the amount of tax. You should have paid and this
269
00:13:02.600 --> 00:13:05.400
decrease in a tax payable show in your contacts
270
00:13:05.400 --> 00:13:08.900
payable. The compensation is more earnings after
271
00:13:08.900 --> 00:13:11.700
tax and more retained earnings. So
272
00:13:11.700 --> 00:13:14.400
here the mistake is the amount of income tax.
273
00:13:14.400 --> 00:13:17.500
You should have accounted as tax payable in June.
274
00:13:17.500 --> 00:13:21.100
It is reducing the income
275
00:13:20.100 --> 00:13:24.000
tax payable and increasing the return
276
00:13:23.400 --> 00:13:25.700
and it's by exactly is the same amount.
277
00:13:26.700 --> 00:13:29.400
So you made a mistake the p&l is
278
00:13:29.400 --> 00:13:32.400
wrong because the bottom line is wrong the balance it
279
00:13:32.400 --> 00:13:35.400
is wrong because there are two items in the balance sheet
280
00:13:35.400 --> 00:13:38.400
which are wrong. But at the end of the day, there's no
281
00:13:38.400 --> 00:13:41.400
change in the total balance sheet and the balance
282
00:13:41.400 --> 00:13:42.100
it is balancing.
283
00:13:43.800 --> 00:13:46.500
Sagon mistake, which is a much more complex and
284
00:13:46.500 --> 00:13:49.400
sophisticated imagine that in June you
285
00:13:49.400 --> 00:13:52.500
forget to account for the depreciation of the machine in
286
00:13:52.500 --> 00:13:54.000
a calculation of the production cost.
287
00:13:55.300 --> 00:13:58.500
What's going to happen for impacts in the balance
288
00:13:58.500 --> 00:14:01.500
it the first one is obvious property plants and
289
00:14:01.500 --> 00:14:04.800
Equipment grows value no change 60,000 which
290
00:14:04.800 --> 00:14:07.800
is a purchase price of the machine but accumulator
291
00:14:07.800 --> 00:14:10.500
depreciation if you forget to depreciate in June,
292
00:14:10.500 --> 00:14:13.400
you have two months of depreciation instead of three. This
293
00:14:13.400 --> 00:14:16.800
is why your property plant and Equipment your tangible fixed
294
00:14:16.800 --> 00:14:20.100
assets net of accumulated depreciation is
295
00:14:19.100 --> 00:14:23.200
overevaluated and it's 58,000
296
00:14:22.200 --> 00:14:26.200
when it should be 57,000. So
297
00:14:25.200 --> 00:14:29.100
you increase your total assets by 1,000.
298
00:14:29.900 --> 00:14:32.900
The second impact is on the inventories.
299
00:14:33.400 --> 00:14:37.000
Because if you forget to account for depreciation you reduce
300
00:14:36.300 --> 00:14:39.800
by the same amount the production cost and
301
00:14:39.800 --> 00:14:41.900
the production cost per unit.
302
00:14:42.600 --> 00:14:45.300
This is why there will be an earned or
303
00:14:45.300 --> 00:14:48.300
evaluation of the inventories of finished goods at the end of the month.
304
00:14:49.200 --> 00:14:53.300
Here what You observe is 21,200 instead
305
00:14:52.300 --> 00:14:56.700
of 21,000,562.
306
00:14:57.300 --> 00:15:01.100
There is a difference of 362.
307
00:15:02.500 --> 00:15:04.400
Let's make a simple calculation.
308
00:15:05.100 --> 00:15:08.400
Depreciation figure which is missing is 1000.
309
00:15:09.400 --> 00:15:09.800
second
310
00:15:10.700 --> 00:15:15.500
the inventory level is under evaluated by 362.
311
00:15:16.200 --> 00:15:19.300
Out of 1000 you can deduct from
312
00:15:19.300 --> 00:15:23.400
that that 36.2% of
313
00:15:22.400 --> 00:15:26.100
the number of units produced in
314
00:15:25.100 --> 00:15:26.700
June.
315
00:15:27.300 --> 00:15:30.900
Have not been sold and show in the invatore
316
00:15:30.900 --> 00:15:32.000
is of finished goods.
317
00:15:32.700 --> 00:15:36.200
But if 362 of
318
00:15:35.200 --> 00:15:38.900
depreciation are wrongly under
319
00:15:38.900 --> 00:15:41.600
evaluating the inventory, what does
320
00:15:41.600 --> 00:15:44.900
it mean the net between this figure and 1000 is
321
00:15:44.900 --> 00:15:46.200
missing in the cost of sales?
322
00:15:47.200 --> 00:15:51.200
1000 minus 362 is
323
00:15:50.200 --> 00:15:53.400
exactly 600 and
324
00:15:53.400 --> 00:15:54.500
38.
325
00:15:55.300 --> 00:15:58.900
So the cost of sales have been wrongly decremented
326
00:15:58.900 --> 00:16:01.600
by 638.
327
00:16:02.700 --> 00:16:05.400
And this is definitely an over evaluation of
328
00:16:05.400 --> 00:16:07.200
the profit before tax.
329
00:16:07.800 --> 00:16:10.400
Now look at the consequence on the asset side
330
00:16:10.400 --> 00:16:14.100
of the balance sheet. We are and Julie increasing
331
00:16:13.100 --> 00:16:16.300
the property plant and Equipment net by
332
00:16:16.300 --> 00:16:17.200
1,000.
333
00:16:17.900 --> 00:16:20.400
And reducing the invitory by
334
00:16:20.400 --> 00:16:23.200
SRI Harrow 62 the difference between these two
335
00:16:23.200 --> 00:16:26.300
figures is 638 which
336
00:16:26.300 --> 00:16:29.200
is increase in a total asset, which is wrong.
337
00:16:29.900 --> 00:16:32.600
But the 600 and 38 is
338
00:16:32.600 --> 00:16:35.400
the increase in earnings before tax.
339
00:16:35.400 --> 00:16:38.400
What is the impact on the equity and liability side
340
00:16:38.400 --> 00:16:39.300
of the balance sheet?
341
00:16:39.900 --> 00:16:42.800
But if you're over evaluate your
342
00:16:42.800 --> 00:16:46.500
earnings before tax by 638, you
343
00:16:46.500 --> 00:16:49.300
are going to overevaluate your income tax
344
00:16:49.300 --> 00:16:53.400
payable by 20% of 638, which
345
00:16:53.400 --> 00:16:56.600
is 128. This is
346
00:16:56.600 --> 00:17:00.100
why your income tax payable is now 7,000 which
347
00:17:00.100 --> 00:17:04.300
is exactly 6,872 plus
348
00:17:03.300 --> 00:17:06.600
100 and 28.
349
00:17:07.500 --> 00:17:10.600
And you're over evaluate all so your
350
00:17:10.600 --> 00:17:13.300
bottom line your net earnings your earnings after
351
00:17:13.300 --> 00:17:17.000
tax by 80% of 600 and
352
00:17:16.800 --> 00:17:19.400
38, which is the earnings before
353
00:17:19.400 --> 00:17:21.700
tax minus income tax payable.
354
00:17:22.500 --> 00:17:25.400
And the difference is 638 minus
355
00:17:25.400 --> 00:17:29.400
128 which is 510. This
356
00:17:28.400 --> 00:17:31.500
is why your retain earnings are
357
00:17:31.500 --> 00:17:34.700
36,720, which
358
00:17:34.700 --> 00:17:39.600
is exactly the sum of 36,210 plus
359
00:17:39.600 --> 00:17:42.000
510.
360
00:17:42.600 --> 00:17:45.700
So you understand that both side of the balance sheet
361
00:17:45.700 --> 00:17:48.800
are going to be incremented by the
362
00:17:48.800 --> 00:17:51.700
increase in yearnings before
363
00:17:51.700 --> 00:17:54.400
tax, which is a consequence of making a
364
00:17:54.400 --> 00:17:58.000
mistake in a calculation of the production cost. I strongly
365
00:17:57.400 --> 00:18:00.500
suggest you go back to this calculation
366
00:18:00.500 --> 00:18:03.700
a little bit later quietly. But if
367
00:18:03.700 --> 00:18:06.800
you really understand the mechanics of
368
00:18:06.800 --> 00:18:09.200
this calculation, you are
369
00:18:09.200 --> 00:18:12.700
extremely comfortable with a mechanics of building
370
00:18:12.700 --> 00:18:16.100
the balance sheet as an integrated document
371
00:18:15.100 --> 00:18:18.800
with p&l and cash flow statement. Now,
372
00:18:18.800 --> 00:18:22.300
let's move to the third contribution financial
373
00:18:21.300 --> 00:18:25.100
analysis Financial Accounting. Why
374
00:18:24.100 --> 00:18:27.900
do we produce accounting statements simply
375
00:18:27.900 --> 00:18:30.500
to record what is happening in
376
00:18:30.500 --> 00:18:34.000
business operations so that we can understand what
377
00:18:33.300 --> 00:18:36.600
is really happening and we can take good
378
00:18:36.600 --> 00:18:40.300
decisions. You remember quite early
379
00:18:39.300 --> 00:18:42.400
in the process. I introduce.
380
00:18:42.700 --> 00:18:45.400
Financial analysis at the end of each
381
00:18:45.400 --> 00:18:46.200
and every month.
382
00:18:47.100 --> 00:18:51.100
Financial analysis is very useful process, but
383
00:18:50.100 --> 00:18:53.400
it is not simply reading the
384
00:18:53.400 --> 00:18:55.800
accounts and making simple calculations.
385
00:18:57.300 --> 00:19:00.800
It's not just about adding and subtracting figures. It
386
00:19:00.800 --> 00:19:03.500
is understanding the link between the figures and
387
00:19:03.500 --> 00:19:06.400
the reality of business operations. Let's
388
00:19:06.400 --> 00:19:08.300
take a very simple example.
389
00:19:09.500 --> 00:19:12.300
You remember that in May the gross margin is down.
390
00:19:13.300 --> 00:19:16.300
If you just observe that the gross margin is down. You're going
391
00:19:16.300 --> 00:19:19.200
to say something terrible, which is happening in a company,
392
00:19:19.200 --> 00:19:20.300
which is absolutely wrong.
393
00:19:21.100 --> 00:19:24.800
The reason why the growth margin is down in May
394
00:19:24.800 --> 00:19:27.300
is that in the cost of sales now, we
395
00:19:27.300 --> 00:19:30.500
show the production cost of these products which
396
00:19:30.500 --> 00:19:33.700
we manufactured in April and whose cost
397
00:19:33.700 --> 00:19:37.200
per unit is 26 dollars as opposed to 20 or
398
00:19:36.200 --> 00:19:39.700
19. Why because volume was
399
00:19:39.700 --> 00:19:43.100
low. So the explanation is volume. It's
400
00:19:42.100 --> 00:19:46.300
a business explanation to an
401
00:19:45.300 --> 00:19:47.600
accounting reality.
402
00:19:48.300 --> 00:19:52.200
Then you understand that mastering technical skills
403
00:19:51.200 --> 00:19:54.300
in accounting is not just
404
00:19:54.300 --> 00:19:57.600
about observing the past. It is also being
405
00:19:57.600 --> 00:20:00.800
good at taking decisions whose impact
406
00:20:00.800 --> 00:20:02.600
is going to show in a future.
407
00:20:03.700 --> 00:20:07.000
And that's why accounting is absolutely of
408
00:20:06.500 --> 00:20:09.400
strategic importance. It's of strategic
409
00:20:09.400 --> 00:20:12.600
importance for the company, but it's of strategic importance
410
00:20:12.600 --> 00:20:16.000
all so for you managers in business operations.
411
00:20:17.300 --> 00:20:20.800
If you just observe the figures and you don't understand the
412
00:20:20.800 --> 00:20:24.400
mechanics, you don't understand the rationality behind
413
00:20:23.400 --> 00:20:27.000
the financial documents. You're
414
00:20:26.200 --> 00:20:29.900
not going to be able to understand really
415
00:20:29.900 --> 00:20:32.100
what happens and you're not going
416
00:20:32.100 --> 00:20:35.600
to be able to take the best decisions for your business
417
00:20:35.600 --> 00:20:36.400
operations.
418
00:20:37.300 --> 00:20:40.700
So you understand that there are very big difference between two
419
00:20:40.700 --> 00:20:44.300
managers two operating managers one who
420
00:20:43.300 --> 00:20:46.600
understands accounting the other
421
00:20:46.600 --> 00:20:47.600
one who does not.
422
00:20:48.400 --> 00:20:51.500
Really understanding what's behind the figures
423
00:20:51.500 --> 00:20:55.000
is a competitive Advantage for you managers
424
00:20:54.100 --> 00:20:56.800
when you run your business operations.
425
00:20:58.400 --> 00:21:01.600
But then you understand that the information which is
426
00:21:01.600 --> 00:21:04.800
in your hands should be as accurate as
427
00:21:04.800 --> 00:21:04.900
possible.
428
00:21:05.900 --> 00:21:08.600
If you use wrong figures in
429
00:21:08.600 --> 00:21:11.800
your understanding of reality and in
430
00:21:11.800 --> 00:21:14.800
your financial analysis, you're going to make wrong
431
00:21:14.800 --> 00:21:15.200
decisions.
432
00:21:16.200 --> 00:21:20.000
This is why accurate information is absolutely fundamental
433
00:21:19.600 --> 00:21:22.500
together with a relevant information.
434
00:21:23.400 --> 00:21:27.000
You managers in business operations, you
435
00:21:26.200 --> 00:21:30.100
need to be provided with information, which
436
00:21:29.100 --> 00:21:32.700
you need in order to take your decision.
437
00:21:33.400 --> 00:21:36.600
This is why you need to have relevant and
438
00:21:36.600 --> 00:21:39.400
accurate information to assess a situation
439
00:21:39.400 --> 00:21:43.000
understand judge evaluate
440
00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:44.000
and decide.
441
00:21:45.300 --> 00:21:48.800
Last but not least a contribution on which I insisted
442
00:21:48.800 --> 00:21:51.700
throughout the three modules growth.
443
00:21:52.200 --> 00:21:55.300
Of course if revenues are growing you're quite
444
00:21:55.300 --> 00:21:58.400
happy because it means that your business model
445
00:21:58.400 --> 00:22:01.400
is right you create value for your customers.
446
00:22:01.400 --> 00:22:04.600
You have the right product. The price is
447
00:22:04.600 --> 00:22:07.900
probably quite okay, at least for your customers and
448
00:22:07.900 --> 00:22:11.700
you are validating the commercial marketing policy
449
00:22:11.700 --> 00:22:14.600
of the firm. This is great because this
450
00:22:14.600 --> 00:22:17.600
is a purpose of the company to serve its customers.
451
00:22:19.300 --> 00:22:22.200
And a performance point of view growth in
452
00:22:22.200 --> 00:22:25.300
revenues is also quite valid and
453
00:22:25.300 --> 00:22:26.300
good for the company.
454
00:22:27.100 --> 00:22:30.500
When you consider fixed costs, which
455
00:22:30.500 --> 00:22:33.400
are not affected by revenues, if you grow
456
00:22:33.400 --> 00:22:36.900
the volume you reduce a fixed cost per unit
457
00:22:36.900 --> 00:22:39.600
and then you improve the economic performance of
458
00:22:39.600 --> 00:22:42.100
the company, which is named economy is a
459
00:22:42.100 --> 00:22:42.200
scale.
460
00:22:43.300 --> 00:22:46.600
Take care because the fixed cost should be really fixed.
461
00:22:46.600 --> 00:22:50.200
And sometimes there are thresholds in
462
00:22:49.200 --> 00:22:51.000
the fixed cost.
463
00:22:51.700 --> 00:22:54.900
You remember the capacity of the machine is 5000
464
00:22:54.900 --> 00:22:57.700
units, but you need three operators from
465
00:22:57.700 --> 00:22:59.700
0 to 2500.
466
00:23:00.400 --> 00:23:03.400
If it goes beyond 2500 you need
467
00:23:03.400 --> 00:23:05.100
three additional operators.
468
00:23:05.800 --> 00:23:08.300
Then you understand that fixed costs are fixed
469
00:23:08.300 --> 00:23:10.600
within a range of figures.
470
00:23:11.200 --> 00:23:14.400
But if you cross the border, then the fixed costs
471
00:23:14.400 --> 00:23:17.600
are incremented by a lumpsum amount
472
00:23:17.600 --> 00:23:20.100
from three to six workers.
473
00:23:21.100 --> 00:23:24.200
I also mentioned depreciation as a fixed cost which is
474
00:23:24.200 --> 00:23:25.700
not entirely true.
475
00:23:26.500 --> 00:23:29.400
Depreciation is a consequence of buying a
476
00:23:29.400 --> 00:23:32.400
machine whose capacity is 5,000 units,
477
00:23:32.400 --> 00:23:35.000
but imagine that in a month, you have to
478
00:23:35.500 --> 00:23:38.200
produce more than 5,000 units. Then you need
479
00:23:38.200 --> 00:23:41.100
to increase the capacity of the machine all you need to buy a second
480
00:23:41.100 --> 00:23:45.000
machine in both case you are going to increase the depreciation. So
481
00:23:44.800 --> 00:23:47.400
depreciation is also a fixed cost
482
00:23:47.400 --> 00:23:51.000
which is fixed within a range beyond
483
00:23:50.300 --> 00:23:53.300
the range depreciation is no more
484
00:23:53.300 --> 00:23:56.000
fixed. It's incremented by the new capacity.
485
00:23:57.300 --> 00:24:00.600
So take care about fixed cost because fixed costs
486
00:24:00.600 --> 00:24:03.400
are fixed within a range and take care about what
487
00:24:03.400 --> 00:24:06.300
happened when you cross the border and you go beyond
488
00:24:06.300 --> 00:24:07.000
the threshold.
489
00:24:08.100 --> 00:24:11.800
We have so far observes a two positive impacts
490
00:24:11.800 --> 00:24:15.000
of growth even though there were some constraints
491
00:24:14.600 --> 00:24:16.600
unlimitation in seron one.
492
00:24:17.200 --> 00:24:19.900
The third one is definitely not positive.
493
00:24:20.700 --> 00:24:24.100
If you want to sell and produce more, what
494
00:24:23.100 --> 00:24:27.300
do you need to do increase your production capacity?
495
00:24:26.300 --> 00:24:30.100
You need to buy a machine. It's
496
00:24:29.100 --> 00:24:32.200
a cash conception you cash out the
497
00:24:32.200 --> 00:24:35.100
purchase price as a machine and what about the
498
00:24:35.100 --> 00:24:38.300
operating working capital requirements going to increase?
499
00:24:39.100 --> 00:24:42.700
You produce more you have more inventories. You
500
00:24:42.700 --> 00:24:45.200
sell more you have more cancerous of all
501
00:24:45.200 --> 00:24:48.200
you produce more you purchase more you have
502
00:24:48.200 --> 00:24:51.700
more accounts payable though. The operating working capital
503
00:24:51.700 --> 00:24:54.300
requirement is mechanically linked with
504
00:24:54.300 --> 00:24:57.600
volume of activity of the company and more
505
00:24:57.600 --> 00:25:00.500
operating working capital requirement is
506
00:25:00.500 --> 00:25:03.600
less cash you remember again,
507
00:25:03.600 --> 00:25:07.200
and again that funds from operations are ebida
508
00:25:06.200 --> 00:25:09.500
minus change in
509
00:25:09.500 --> 00:25:13.100
the operating working capital requirement more operating
510
00:25:12.100 --> 00:25:15.700
working capital requirement less funds
511
00:25:15.700 --> 00:25:16.400
from operations.
512
00:25:17.700 --> 00:25:20.300
Growth consumes cash. It's
513
00:25:20.300 --> 00:25:23.600
a fundamental statement for large companies and it
514
00:25:23.600 --> 00:25:27.000
is even more fundamental for startups. You
515
00:25:26.400 --> 00:25:29.700
are started you build a business model. You
516
00:25:29.700 --> 00:25:32.300
start selling your products and You observe
517
00:25:32.300 --> 00:25:33.400
a commercial success.
518
00:25:34.100 --> 00:25:37.300
So you are quite happy because it means that there's a product
519
00:25:37.300 --> 00:25:40.400
Market fit and it works. Absolutely great.
520
00:25:41.200 --> 00:25:44.800
But when you start selling your goods and services, maybe you
521
00:25:44.800 --> 00:25:47.300
have not yet Rich Break Even. You're a
522
00:25:47.300 --> 00:25:50.700
bit dies negative or you're a bit dies hardly positive.
523
00:25:51.500 --> 00:25:54.200
But if revenues are up you need
524
00:25:54.200 --> 00:25:57.800
to invest in capital expenditures cash out you are
525
00:25:57.800 --> 00:26:00.600
going to observe your operating working capital requirement, which
526
00:26:00.600 --> 00:26:02.000
is up cash out.
527
00:26:02.600 --> 00:26:06.100
And then negligible a bit minus capex
528
00:26:05.100 --> 00:26:08.600
minus increasing working capital requirement
529
00:26:08.600 --> 00:26:11.400
is going to give you a strongly negative free cash
530
00:26:11.400 --> 00:26:11.600
flow.
531
00:26:12.200 --> 00:26:15.100
Then you visit your bankers and your Bankers say I don't want to
532
00:26:15.100 --> 00:26:18.400
provide any debt because you're a bit is not large enough
533
00:26:18.400 --> 00:26:19.800
to pay the interest expense.
534
00:26:20.500 --> 00:26:23.300
So if Bankers are out of the picture, you have to visit the
535
00:26:23.300 --> 00:26:27.100
shareholders and what is very interesting is the
536
00:26:26.100 --> 00:26:29.300
more you grow the more you
537
00:26:29.300 --> 00:26:32.800
consume cash the quicker you have to visit your shareholders
538
00:26:32.800 --> 00:26:35.500
and the quicker as an entrepreneur you are
539
00:26:35.500 --> 00:26:36.800
going to be diluted.
540
00:26:37.700 --> 00:26:41.700
This is definitely one of the key issues startups
541
00:26:40.700 --> 00:26:43.600
and entrepreneurs are facing
542
00:26:43.600 --> 00:26:44.900
about growth.
543
00:26:45.900 --> 00:26:48.500
Now, let's go back to you as managers and
544
00:26:48.500 --> 00:26:51.400
business operations. Of course, you have to increase
545
00:26:51.400 --> 00:26:54.200
a bit down. Take care. They are a little
546
00:26:54.200 --> 00:26:58.000
bit of biases with indicator. But if you increase a
547
00:26:57.200 --> 00:27:00.400
bit, it's not enough. You also
548
00:27:00.400 --> 00:27:03.600
have to manage a cash conversion cycle the operating
549
00:27:03.600 --> 00:27:06.700
working capital requirements so that you can transform the Bida
550
00:27:06.700 --> 00:27:09.500
into funds from operations. And you also
551
00:27:09.500 --> 00:27:13.100
have to carefully select your investment projects. You
552
00:27:12.100 --> 00:27:15.500
can invest in capital expenditures today
553
00:27:15.500 --> 00:27:19.000
because you selected great investment projects
554
00:27:18.400 --> 00:27:21.600
yesterday, we charge generating a bit
555
00:27:21.600 --> 00:27:24.900
today, which you can transform into funds from operations and
556
00:27:24.900 --> 00:27:27.300
those great projects which you decide to
557
00:27:27.300 --> 00:27:30.500
invest in today are going to generate even more funds from
558
00:27:30.500 --> 00:27:33.500
operations in the future. That is the essence
559
00:27:33.500 --> 00:27:36.500
of your job. You operating managers as
560
00:27:36.500 --> 00:27:39.800
Fast Finance and Accounting are concerned.
561
00:27:40.800 --> 00:27:43.500
Now the progress report on the first three
562
00:27:43.500 --> 00:27:46.300
modules is over we can start
563
00:27:46.300 --> 00:27:49.600
with module 4 now you remember in module 3
564
00:27:49.600 --> 00:27:52.400
we invested in material in
565
00:27:52.400 --> 00:27:56.100
tangible investment. We bought a machine property
566
00:27:55.100 --> 00:27:58.400
plant and Equipment a real asset but
567
00:27:58.400 --> 00:28:01.900
as you know companies invest intangible fixed
568
00:28:01.900 --> 00:28:04.500
assets increasing capacity in a manufacturing
569
00:28:04.500 --> 00:28:08.200
footprint, but they also invest in intensible assets.
570
00:28:07.200 --> 00:28:10.500
It's going to be the issue of
571
00:28:10.500 --> 00:28:11.300
module 4
572
00:28:12.200 --> 00:28:15.600
That will be two imagerial investment one is
573
00:28:15.600 --> 00:28:19.200
going to be purchasing intellectual property a
574
00:28:18.200 --> 00:28:21.200
software. I will give you the description of
575
00:28:21.200 --> 00:28:24.900
that and invest in research and development so
576
00:28:24.900 --> 00:28:27.700
that we can design different new
577
00:28:27.700 --> 00:28:30.700
Innovative products to serve our customers.
578
00:28:31.700 --> 00:28:34.700
This will be the focus of module 4.
We Stand now at the end of the third module out of 5 of this course accounting for business operations During two modules.
We have simply sold products which we had purchased from A supplier.
But in the third module, I have introduced a very significant degree of complexity by creating our own manufacturing footprint.
The reason why I think now that it's very important to take a step back at the end of these first 10 months of business operations so that we can get back to the fundamental contributions of this course.
I truly believe that there are four fundamental contributions.
We have to Deep dive in the first one constant from module 1 to module 3 change in cash is not profit.
There is a significant difference and there are many reasons why which I am going to detail a little bit later on.
The second contribution is we have accounted for business operations.
And what is very important to understand is that it's a process which is very stable robust mechanism.
It's always the same story and it works very well and it's reliable.
third contribution accounting is about producing numbers but financial analysis is not about reading numbers and making simple calculations.
It goes much Beyond this very simple activity.
And again, I will detail that.
Last but not least the force contribution is something I repeatedly said during the stream modules growth is a very ambiguous process.
Is it economic performance? Of course, it's great because it's value creation for the customer.
But what are the potential negative impacts of growth? The first contribution is that definitely profit does not match with cash.
There are plenty of reasons, but I developed four key reasons why they don't match.
The first one is a concept whose name is operating working capital requirement.
Which comes from what? First there's a time lag between the moment you account for a revenue and the moment you cash from sales.
There's a timelap between the moment you purchase you can't for expenses and you pay your suppliers.
This is why because of this time lag you account for accounts receivable.
You can't for accounts payable and the end of the day cash and profits are not the same.
There's a third reason why which is about inventories and it is calculated in the operating working capital requirement.
In fact, there is is Cash in a warehouse, but it's not profit you need inventories because there is uncertainty on the demand there is maybe a lack of flexibility in the manufacturing footprint, but that the end of the day it's cash.
It's no profit not yet profit.
Then operating working capital requirement, which is inventories plus receivables minus payables is definitely the reason why at first profits and cash do not match you remember funds from operations is a bit duck profit minus changing the operating working capital requirement and six difference between profit and cash is definitely first operating working capital requirement change.
But there are some other reasons you remember in a module 3.
We are in April and we buy a machine and we start depreciating.
I told you that the investment itself is a cash flow, but the depreciation is not a cash flow.
It is a cost.
It is a conception.
It is a usage of the machine the progressive usage of the machine.
So it is a non-cash expense, which is absolutely fundamental to take into account in the calculation of the production cost.
This is a non-cash expense.
This is in the profit but it's not cash second difference.
There are some other non-cash expense.
For example, if you receive stock options, it's going to show in a p&l as labor related expenses, but it's no cash out for the company even when it is exercised.
Third reason let's go back to the machine.
It's an investment.
It's a cash outflow, but it's a cash out flow, which is not an expense.
It will generate revenues an income in the future because you are going to generate cost savings.
It's going to show in a p&l but later but the moment you account for the investment.
It has absolutely no impact in a p&l the moment you start depreciating the investment.
It has an impact on the p&l but it's not the capital expenditures itself as a cash outlay.
Same story for the financing financing is Cash in but it's not an income.
It's not a revenue and it's not an expense.
When you convince the banker to provide funds so that you can Finance at least part of the purchase price of the machine.
This is an inflow, but it does nothing to do with selling goods and services.
So it should not be in the p&l.
It is in the balance sheet.
It is in a cash flow statement.
It's not a profit.
It was the same story by the way in module 1 when we created the company, we provided the cash account of the company with capital.
It was cash.
It was capital and we had not yet started the business operations.
We had not yet started selling anything, but it was cash and it was financing.
You understand that there are many reasons including four key factors, why profit and cash they definitely don't match.
so on point these three statements are perfectly integrated.
You remember we first build the p&l the income statement revenues less cost in parallel.
We have a second film which is accounting for cash inflows and outflows.
Which is very interesting is that there is an interaction between period and cash for example accounts receivable.
You have the accounts receivable at the beginning of the month.
What is due from your customers? What do you add a p&l item revenues? What do you deduct the cash collection from sales? What do you get at the end the accounts receivable at the end of the month which is going to show in the balancing.
Through your understand that we are running to films in parallel.
One is a p&l how much profit or loss do we generate out of selling goods and services.
The second film is Cash in cash out.
What is absolutely fascinating and integrated is out of these two films we end on the common picture which is a talented at the end of the period so we have two films to build a picture.
This is a very well-oiled machine.
You understand that we always do the same from module 1 to module three, I progressively introduced complexity but that we account for inventories.
It's always the same thing when we account for accounts receivable.
It's always the same thing when we account for net earnings more or less distributed more or less reinvested in a retain earnings.
It's always the same thing though this mechanics.
This machine is extremely robust and stable.
One of the interesting consequence of that is the balance it always balances, whatever you do.
Let's take four examples two business modifications and two mistakes.
First you remember that we have decided to reinvest when her percent of the bottom line into retained earnings.
Let's imagine that we change the dividend policy and we decided to distribute 50% What happens to the balance sheet it's going to be modified, but it will balance.
Second modification you remember that we pay 50% of the purchases immediately and 50% with a one month delay imagine that we've been able to convince our suppliers to pay one hundred percent of the purchases in one month instead of 50% What's going to happen to the balancy, but more interestingly.
Let's imagine that we make a mistake.
Oh in June we forgot to account for income tax the balance it will be wrong, but it's going to balance.
Much more complex, imagine that in the calculation of the production cost.
We forgot to account for the depreciation of the machine in the production costs calculation.
The balance sheet will be wrong.
The p&l will be wrong.
But the balance sheet will balance.
Let's have a look at these four situations one after the other.
first one imagine that we decide to distribute 15% of the profit the net earnings in June were 12,886 50% of that is 6,443.
If we decide at the end of June to distribute it if you don't to the shareholders will have to show that in the balance sheet.
It's going to be dividend payable.
It's decided in June.
It's going to be Pat in July, August or whatsoever.
But if we decide to distribute it if it done we are going to reinvest Less in the retained earnings.
You remember that retainer.
This is earnings minus dividends.
So they retainer Nicks are going to be reduced by the amount of dividend which is going to be paid to the shareholders.
And if you don't which is not going to be reinvested in the shareholders equity.
So retainer earnings are down by 6,443 and dividends payable is by 6,443.
The total balance.
It is the same.
There's plus something here and minus something there the balance it is balancing.
Second situation in which the total balance it is modified, even though the balance of the balance sheet is preserved.
You have negotiated with your suppliers to pay them 100% of the purchases in one month instead of 50% What is a consequence of the balance sheet the accounts payable figure is going to be very much incremented.
It's no more 50% of the purchases.
It's 100% of the purchases now.
It's 50,960 which is the entire purchases of the months.
that the first point now what is a second impact on the balance sheet it will show on the asset side.
Because if you have postponed the payment of the 50% of the purchases, you used to pair to your suppliers before.
Now this cash is in your pocket.
So you have more cash in your bank account simply because you did not pay your suppliers by the amount of money which shows in your accounts payable at the end of the month.
So you have more cash which exactly compensates more accounts payable.
What is interesting in these two situations is? The first alternative is that the compensation is going to show in the same column either assets or equity and liabilities.
You have more dividend payable and you have less retained earnings plus minus.
The resulting impact is Neil and the total balance sheet Remains the Same Sergeant alternative the compensation in one column will show in the other column.
Then you're going to compensate accounts payable and cash for example, but then the balance sheet is going to keep on balancing which is extremely predictable.
But the total balance sheet is going to be affected by the change in the value of these items.
Now the next two steps are quite interesting because we are going to make a mistake.
The p&l is going to be wrong the balance it is going to be wrong.
But the balance it will balance imagine for example that we made a mistake and we forgot to account for taxes in June.
So there is no increment in income tax payable because what is missing is 20% of the earnings before tax generated by our activity in the month of June.
If the income tax payable is down by the tax which disappeared you have generated more earnings after tax because earnings before tax and the earnings after tax now and it's wrong are the same.
You have not reduced the retainer earnings by the amount of tax.
You should have paid and this decrease in a tax payable show in your contacts payable.
The compensation is more earnings after tax and more retained earnings.
So here the mistake is the amount of income tax.
You should have accounted as tax payable in June.
It is reducing the income tax payable and increasing the return and it's by exactly is the same amount.
So you made a mistake the p&l is wrong because the bottom line is wrong the balance it is wrong because there are two items in the balance sheet which are wrong.
But at the end of the day, there's no change in the total balance sheet and the balance it is balancing.
Sagon mistake, which is a much more complex and sophisticated imagine that in June you forget to account for the depreciation of the machine in a calculation of the production cost.
What's going to happen for impacts in the balance it the first one is obvious property plants and Equipment grows value no change 60,000 which is a purchase price of the machine but accumulator depreciation if you forget to depreciate in June, you have two months of depreciation instead of three.
This is why your property plant and Equipment your tangible fixed assets net of accumulated depreciation is overevaluated and it's 58,000 when it should be 57,000.
So you increase your total assets by 1,000.
The second impact is on the inventories.
Because if you forget to account for depreciation you reduce by the same amount the production cost and the production cost per unit.
This is why there will be an earned or evaluation of the inventories of finished goods at the end of the month.
Here what You observe is 21,200 instead of 21,000,562.
There is a difference of 362.
Let's make a simple calculation.
Depreciation figure which is missing is 1000.
second the inventory level is under evaluated by 362.
Out of 1000 you can deduct from that that 36.2% of the number of units produced in June.
Have not been sold and show in the invatore is of finished goods.
But if 362 of depreciation are wrongly under evaluating the inventory, what does it mean the net between this figure and 1000 is missing in the cost of sales? 1000 minus 362 is exactly 600 and 38.
So the cost of sales have been wrongly decremented by 638.
And this is definitely an over evaluation of the profit before tax.
Now look at the consequence on the asset side of the balance sheet.
We are and Julie increasing the property plant and Equipment net by 1,000.
And reducing the invitory by SRI Harrow 62 the difference between these two figures is 638 which is increase in a total asset, which is wrong.
But the 600 and 38 is the increase in earnings before tax.
What is the impact on the equity and liability side of the balance sheet? But if you're over evaluate your earnings before tax by 638, you are going to overevaluate your income tax payable by 20% of 638, which is 128.
This is why your income tax payable is now 7,000 which is exactly 6,872 plus 100 and 28.
And you're over evaluate all so your bottom line your net earnings your earnings after tax by 80% of 600 and 38, which is the earnings before tax minus income tax payable.
And the difference is 638 minus 128 which is 510.
This is why your retain earnings are 36,720, which is exactly the sum of 36,210 plus 510.
So you understand that both side of the balance sheet are going to be incremented by the increase in yearnings before tax, which is a consequence of making a mistake in a calculation of the production cost.
I strongly suggest you go back to this calculation a little bit later quietly.
But if you really understand the mechanics of this calculation, you are extremely comfortable with a mechanics of building the balance sheet as an integrated document with p&l and cash flow statement.
Now, let's move to the third contribution financial analysis Financial Accounting.
Why do we produce accounting statements simply to record what is happening in business operations so that we can understand what is really happening and we can take good decisions.
You remember quite early in the process.
I introduce.
Financial analysis at the end of each and every month.
Financial analysis is very useful process, but it is not simply reading the accounts and making simple calculations.
It's not just about adding and subtracting figures.
It is understanding the link between the figures and the reality of business operations.
Let's take a very simple example.
You remember that in May the gross margin is down.
If you just observe that the gross margin is down.
You're going to say something terrible, which is happening in a company, which is absolutely wrong.
The reason why the growth margin is down in May is that in the cost of sales now, we show the production cost of these products which we manufactured in April and whose cost per unit is 26 dollars as opposed to 20 or 19.
Why because volume was low.
So the explanation is volume.
It's a business explanation to an accounting reality.
Then you understand that mastering technical skills in accounting is not just about observing the past.
It is also being good at taking decisions whose impact is going to show in a future.
And that's why accounting is absolutely of strategic importance.
It's of strategic importance for the company, but it's of strategic importance all so for you managers in business operations.
If you just observe the figures and you don't understand the mechanics, you don't understand the rationality behind the financial documents.
You're not going to be able to understand really what happens and you're not going to be able to take the best decisions for your business operations.
So you understand that there are very big difference between two managers two operating managers one who understands accounting the other one who does not.
Really understanding what's behind the figures is a competitive Advantage for you managers when you run your business operations.
But then you understand that the information which is in your hands should be as accurate as possible.
If you use wrong figures in your understanding of reality and in your financial analysis, you're going to make wrong decisions.
This is why accurate information is absolutely fundamental together with a relevant information.
You managers in business operations, you need to be provided with information, which you need in order to take your decision.
This is why you need to have relevant and accurate information to assess a situation understand judge evaluate and decide.
Last but not least a contribution on which I insisted throughout the three modules growth.
Of course if revenues are growing you're quite happy because it means that your business model is right you create value for your customers.
You have the right product.
The price is probably quite okay, at least for your customers and you are validating the commercial marketing policy of the firm.
This is great because this is a purpose of the company to serve its customers.
And a performance point of view growth in revenues is also quite valid and good for the company.
When you consider fixed costs, which are not affected by revenues, if you grow the volume you reduce a fixed cost per unit and then you improve the economic performance of the company, which is named economy is a scale.
Take care because the fixed cost should be really fixed.
And sometimes there are thresholds in the fixed cost.
You remember the capacity of the machine is 5000 units, but you need three operators from 0 to 2500.
If it goes beyond 2500 you need three additional operators.
Then you understand that fixed costs are fixed within a range of figures.
But if you cross the border, then the fixed costs are incremented by a lumpsum amount from three to six workers.
I also mentioned depreciation as a fixed cost which is not entirely true.
Depreciation is a consequence of buying a machine whose capacity is 5,000 units, but imagine that in a month, you have to produce more than 5,000 units.
Then you need to increase the capacity of the machine all you need to buy a second machine in both case you are going to increase the depreciation.
So depreciation is also a fixed cost which is fixed within a range beyond the range depreciation is no more fixed.
It's incremented by the new capacity.
So take care about fixed cost because fixed costs are fixed within a range and take care about what happened when you cross the border and you go beyond the threshold.
We have so far observes a two positive impacts of growth even though there were some constraints unlimitation in seron one.
The third one is definitely not positive.
If you want to sell and produce more, what do you need to do increase your production capacity? You need to buy a machine.
It's a cash conception you cash out the purchase price as a machine and what about the operating working capital requirements going to increase? You produce more you have more inventories.
You sell more you have more cancerous of all you produce more you purchase more you have more accounts payable though.
The operating working capital requirement is mechanically linked with volume of activity of the company and more operating working capital requirement is less cash you remember again, and again that funds from operations are ebida minus change in the operating working capital requirement more operating working capital requirement less funds from operations.
Growth consumes cash.
It's a fundamental statement for large companies and it is even more fundamental for startups.
You are started you build a business model.
You start selling your products and You observe a commercial success.
So you are quite happy because it means that there's a product Market fit and it works.
Absolutely great.
But when you start selling your goods and services, maybe you have not yet Rich Break Even.
You're a bit dies negative or you're a bit dies hardly positive.
But if revenues are up you need to invest in capital expenditures cash out you are going to observe your operating working capital requirement, which is up cash out.
And then negligible a bit minus capex minus increasing working capital requirement is going to give you a strongly negative free cash flow.
Then you visit your bankers and your Bankers say I don't want to provide any debt because you're a bit is not large enough to pay the interest expense.
So if Bankers are out of the picture, you have to visit the shareholders and what is very interesting is the more you grow the more you consume cash the quicker you have to visit your shareholders and the quicker as an entrepreneur you are going to be diluted.
This is definitely one of the key issues startups and entrepreneurs are facing about growth.
Now, let's go back to you as managers and business operations.
Of course, you have to increase a bit down.
Take care.
They are a little bit of biases with indicator.
But if you increase a bit, it's not enough.
You also have to manage a cash conversion cycle the operating working capital requirements so that you can transform the Bida into funds from operations.
And you also have to carefully select your investment projects.
You can invest in capital expenditures today because you selected great investment projects yesterday, we charge generating a bit today, which you can transform into funds from operations and those great projects which you decide to invest in today are going to generate even more funds from operations in the future.
That is the essence of your job.
You operating managers as Fast Finance and Accounting are concerned.
Now the progress report on the first three modules is over we can start with module 4 now you remember in module 3 we invested in material in tangible investment.
We bought a machine property plant and Equipment a real asset but as you know companies invest intangible fixed assets increasing capacity in a manufacturing footprint, but they also invest in intensible assets.
It's going to be the issue of module 4 That will be two imagerial investment one is going to be purchasing intellectual property a software.
I will give you the description of that and invest in research and development so that we can design different new Innovative products to serve our customers.
This will be the focus of module 4.