OCP Group E-Cademy Dominique Jacquet

  • E-learning
  • Podcasts & Vidcasts
  • Educational films
  • Courses and Certifications
  • OCP Issues Analysis
  • Fr
  • E-learning
  • Podcasts & Vidcasts
  • Educational films
  • Courses and Certifications
  • OCP Issues Analysis
  • Fr
  • Fr

Accounting for entrepreneurs, module 3 // Purchase of a machine, Progress Report

  1. Accounting for entrepreneurs
  2. Accounting for entrepreneurs, module 3 // Purchase of a machine, Progress Report
Étape Content
Course « Accounting For Entrepreneurs » Module 3 – Test / MCQ
Previous Étape
Back to Course
Next Exercise
WEBVTT 1 00:00:00.900 --> 00:00:03.700 We Stand now at the end of the third module 2 00:00:03.700 --> 00:00:07.000 out of 5 of this course accounting 3 00:00:06.300 --> 00:00:08.800 for business operations 4 00:00:10.100 --> 00:00:14.400 During two modules. We have simply sold products 5 00:00:13.400 --> 00:00:16.400 which we had purchased from 6 00:00:16.400 --> 00:00:17.200 A supplier. 7 00:00:18.100 --> 00:00:22.100 But in the third module, I have introduced a very significant 8 00:00:21.100 --> 00:00:25.400 degree of complexity by creating 9 00:00:24.400 --> 00:00:28.100 our own manufacturing footprint. 10 00:00:29.300 --> 00:00:32.300 The reason why I think now that it's 11 00:00:32.300 --> 00:00:35.800 very important to take a step back at the 12 00:00:35.800 --> 00:00:38.500 end of these first 10 months of business 13 00:00:38.500 --> 00:00:41.600 operations so that we can get back 14 00:00:41.600 --> 00:00:44.500 to the fundamental contributions of this 15 00:00:44.500 --> 00:00:44.800 course. 16 00:00:45.700 --> 00:00:49.000 I truly believe that there are four fundamental 17 00:00:48.700 --> 00:00:51.300 contributions. We have to Deep dive in 18 00:00:51.300 --> 00:00:54.700 the first one constant from module 1 19 00:00:54.700 --> 00:00:57.700 to module 3 change in cash is 20 00:00:57.700 --> 00:01:00.800 not profit. There is a significant difference 21 00:01:00.800 --> 00:01:03.400 and there are many reasons why which I 22 00:01:03.400 --> 00:01:05.200 am going to detail a little bit later on. 23 00:01:06.100 --> 00:01:09.300 The second contribution is we have accounted for 24 00:01:09.300 --> 00:01:12.600 business operations. And what is very important 25 00:01:12.600 --> 00:01:16.000 to understand is that it's a process which is very stable 26 00:01:15.300 --> 00:01:18.900 robust mechanism. It's 27 00:01:18.900 --> 00:01:21.200 always the same story and it 28 00:01:21.200 --> 00:01:23.500 works very well and it's reliable. 29 00:01:25.100 --> 00:01:26.100 third contribution 30 00:01:26.800 --> 00:01:29.800 accounting is about producing numbers 31 00:01:29.800 --> 00:01:32.200 but financial analysis is 32 00:01:32.200 --> 00:01:36.400 not about reading numbers and making simple calculations. It 33 00:01:35.400 --> 00:01:38.700 goes much Beyond this very 34 00:01:38.700 --> 00:01:41.500 simple activity. And again, I 35 00:01:41.500 --> 00:01:42.300 will detail that. 36 00:01:43.300 --> 00:01:46.600 Last but not least the force contribution is something I 37 00:01:46.600 --> 00:01:50.300 repeatedly said during the stream modules growth 38 00:01:49.300 --> 00:01:52.800 is a very ambiguous process. Is 39 00:01:52.800 --> 00:01:55.200 it economic performance? Of course, it's 40 00:01:55.200 --> 00:01:58.800 great because it's value creation for the customer. But what 41 00:01:58.800 --> 00:02:01.500 are the potential negative impacts of 42 00:02:01.500 --> 00:02:01.900 growth? 43 00:02:03.100 --> 00:02:06.800 The first contribution is that definitely profit does 44 00:02:06.800 --> 00:02:09.600 not match with cash. There are 45 00:02:09.600 --> 00:02:12.800 plenty of reasons, but I developed four key 46 00:02:12.800 --> 00:02:14.600 reasons why they don't match. 47 00:02:15.200 --> 00:02:18.700 The first one is a concept whose name is operating working capital 48 00:02:18.700 --> 00:02:21.000 requirement. Which comes from what? 49 00:02:21.700 --> 00:02:24.500 First there's a time lag between the 50 00:02:24.500 --> 00:02:27.400 moment you account for a revenue and the moment 51 00:02:27.400 --> 00:02:30.600 you cash from sales. There's a timelap 52 00:02:30.600 --> 00:02:33.700 between the moment you purchase you can't 53 00:02:33.700 --> 00:02:37.000 for expenses and you pay your suppliers. This 54 00:02:36.200 --> 00:02:39.400 is why because of this time lag 55 00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:42.900 you account for accounts receivable. You can't for accounts 56 00:02:42.900 --> 00:02:45.500 payable and the end of the day cash and 57 00:02:45.500 --> 00:02:48.700 profits are not the same. There's a third 58 00:02:48.700 --> 00:02:51.900 reason why which is about inventories and 59 00:02:51.900 --> 00:02:54.500 it is calculated in the operating working 60 00:02:54.500 --> 00:02:57.300 capital requirement. In fact, there is is 61 00:02:57.300 --> 00:03:01.300 Cash in a warehouse, but it's not profit you 62 00:03:00.300 --> 00:03:04.000 need inventories because there is uncertainty 63 00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:06.000 on the demand there is maybe 64 00:03:06.500 --> 00:03:09.500 a lack of flexibility in the manufacturing footprint, but that 65 00:03:09.500 --> 00:03:12.500 the end of the day it's cash. It's no profit 66 00:03:12.500 --> 00:03:13.900 not yet profit. 67 00:03:14.500 --> 00:03:17.700 Then operating working capital requirement, which is inventories 68 00:03:17.700 --> 00:03:20.700 plus receivables minus payables is definitely 69 00:03:20.700 --> 00:03:23.900 the reason why at first profits 70 00:03:23.900 --> 00:03:26.500 and cash do not match you remember 71 00:03:26.500 --> 00:03:29.500 funds from operations is a bit duck 72 00:03:29.500 --> 00:03:32.300 profit minus changing the 73 00:03:32.300 --> 00:03:36.000 operating working capital requirement and six difference 74 00:03:35.500 --> 00:03:38.600 between profit and cash is definitely 75 00:03:38.600 --> 00:03:41.800 first operating working capital requirement 76 00:03:41.800 --> 00:03:42.300 change. 77 00:03:43.100 --> 00:03:46.700 But there are some other reasons you remember in a 78 00:03:46.700 --> 00:03:49.500 module 3. We are in April and we buy a 79 00:03:49.500 --> 00:03:52.800 machine and we start depreciating. I told you that the 80 00:03:52.800 --> 00:03:55.900 investment itself is a cash flow, but the 81 00:03:55.900 --> 00:03:58.300 depreciation is not a cash flow. It is 82 00:03:58.300 --> 00:04:01.500 a cost. It is a conception. It is a usage of the machine the 83 00:04:01.500 --> 00:04:04.200 progressive usage of the machine. So it is a 84 00:04:04.200 --> 00:04:07.900 non-cash expense, which is absolutely fundamental to 85 00:04:07.900 --> 00:04:10.500 take into account in the calculation of the production 86 00:04:10.500 --> 00:04:10.900 cost. 87 00:04:11.700 --> 00:04:14.300 This is a non-cash expense. This is 88 00:04:14.300 --> 00:04:17.700 in the profit but it's not cash second difference. 89 00:04:17.700 --> 00:04:20.500 There are some other non-cash expense. For 90 00:04:20.500 --> 00:04:23.100 example, if you receive stock options, it's going to 91 00:04:23.100 --> 00:04:26.800 show in a p&l as labor related expenses, but 92 00:04:26.800 --> 00:04:30.000 it's no cash out for the company even when 93 00:04:29.400 --> 00:04:31.300 it is exercised. 94 00:04:32.900 --> 00:04:35.200 Third reason let's go back to 95 00:04:35.200 --> 00:04:39.100 the machine. It's an investment. It's a cash outflow, but 96 00:04:38.100 --> 00:04:41.300 it's a cash out flow, which is not an expense. 97 00:04:41.300 --> 00:04:44.800 It will generate revenues an income 98 00:04:44.800 --> 00:04:47.800 in the future because you are going to generate cost savings. 99 00:04:47.800 --> 00:04:51.000 It's going to show in a p&l but later but the 100 00:04:50.100 --> 00:04:53.200 moment you account for the investment. It has 101 00:04:53.200 --> 00:04:56.400 absolutely no impact in a p&l the moment 102 00:04:56.400 --> 00:04:59.500 you start depreciating the investment. It has 103 00:04:59.500 --> 00:05:03.100 an impact on the p&l but it's not the capital expenditures itself 104 00:05:02.100 --> 00:05:04.300 as a cash outlay. 105 00:05:05.500 --> 00:05:08.500 Same story for the financing financing is Cash in but 106 00:05:08.500 --> 00:05:11.500 it's not an income. It's not a revenue and it's 107 00:05:11.500 --> 00:05:12.200 not an expense. 108 00:05:12.900 --> 00:05:15.800 When you convince the banker to provide funds so 109 00:05:15.800 --> 00:05:18.200 that you can Finance at least part of the 110 00:05:18.200 --> 00:05:21.700 purchase price of the machine. This is an inflow, 111 00:05:21.700 --> 00:05:24.500 but it does nothing to do with selling goods and 112 00:05:24.500 --> 00:05:27.400 services. So it should not be in the p&l. It 113 00:05:27.400 --> 00:05:30.500 is in the balance sheet. It is in a cash flow statement. It's 114 00:05:30.500 --> 00:05:31.300 not a profit. 115 00:05:32.300 --> 00:05:35.400 It was the same story by the way in module 1 when we 116 00:05:35.400 --> 00:05:38.600 created the company, we provided the cash 117 00:05:38.600 --> 00:05:41.500 account of the company with capital. It was cash. 118 00:05:41.500 --> 00:05:44.600 It was capital and we had not yet 119 00:05:44.600 --> 00:05:47.500 started the business operations. We had not 120 00:05:47.500 --> 00:05:50.500 yet started selling anything, but it was cash 121 00:05:50.500 --> 00:05:51.800 and it was financing. 122 00:05:52.300 --> 00:05:56.400 You understand that there are many reasons including four 123 00:05:55.400 --> 00:05:58.400 key factors, why profit and 124 00:05:58.400 --> 00:06:01.000 cash they definitely don't match. 125 00:06:02.500 --> 00:06:03.500 so on point 126 00:06:04.200 --> 00:06:07.900 these three statements are perfectly integrated. 127 00:06:07.900 --> 00:06:11.000 You remember we first build the p&l 128 00:06:10.200 --> 00:06:13.600 the income statement revenues less 129 00:06:13.600 --> 00:06:16.500 cost in parallel. We have a second film 130 00:06:16.500 --> 00:06:19.900 which is accounting for cash inflows and 131 00:06:19.900 --> 00:06:20.400 outflows. 132 00:06:21.400 --> 00:06:24.700 Which is very interesting is that there is an interaction between period and 133 00:06:24.700 --> 00:06:27.100 cash for example accounts receivable. 134 00:06:27.700 --> 00:06:30.300 You have the accounts receivable at the beginning of the month. What 135 00:06:30.300 --> 00:06:33.200 is due from your customers? What do you 136 00:06:33.200 --> 00:06:36.800 add a p&l item revenues? What 137 00:06:36.800 --> 00:06:40.000 do you deduct the cash collection 138 00:06:39.300 --> 00:06:42.500 from sales? What do you get at the 139 00:06:42.500 --> 00:06:45.400 end the accounts receivable at the end of the month which is going 140 00:06:45.400 --> 00:06:46.700 to show in the balancing. 141 00:06:47.300 --> 00:06:50.300 Through your understand that we are running to films in 142 00:06:50.300 --> 00:06:53.700 parallel. One is a p&l how much profit 143 00:06:53.700 --> 00:06:56.400 or loss do we generate out of selling goods 144 00:06:56.400 --> 00:06:59.300 and services. The second film 145 00:06:59.300 --> 00:07:02.300 is Cash in cash out. What is 146 00:07:02.300 --> 00:07:06.000 absolutely fascinating and integrated is 147 00:07:05.400 --> 00:07:08.400 out of these two films we end on the 148 00:07:08.400 --> 00:07:11.100 common picture which is a talented at 149 00:07:11.100 --> 00:07:14.700 the end of the period so we have two films to 150 00:07:14.700 --> 00:07:17.100 build a picture. This is a very 151 00:07:17.100 --> 00:07:19.400 well-oiled machine. 152 00:07:20.400 --> 00:07:23.200 You understand that we always do the same 153 00:07:23.200 --> 00:07:27.000 from module 1 to module three, I progressively introduced 154 00:07:26.800 --> 00:07:29.400 complexity but that we account 155 00:07:29.400 --> 00:07:32.500 for inventories. It's always the same thing when we account for 156 00:07:32.500 --> 00:07:36.000 accounts receivable. It's always the same thing when we account for net 157 00:07:35.500 --> 00:07:38.900 earnings more or less distributed more 158 00:07:38.900 --> 00:07:41.600 or less reinvested in a retain earnings. It's always 159 00:07:41.600 --> 00:07:44.700 the same thing though this mechanics. This 160 00:07:44.700 --> 00:07:47.600 machine is extremely robust and 161 00:07:47.600 --> 00:07:48.000 stable. 162 00:07:49.200 --> 00:07:52.800 One of the interesting consequence of that is 163 00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:56.100 the balance it always balances, 164 00:07:55.100 --> 00:07:57.200 whatever you do. 165 00:07:58.600 --> 00:08:01.800 Let's take four examples two business modifications 166 00:08:01.800 --> 00:08:03.200 and two mistakes. 167 00:08:04.200 --> 00:08:07.700 First you remember that we have decided to reinvest when 168 00:08:07.700 --> 00:08:10.600 her percent of the bottom line into retained earnings. 169 00:08:11.400 --> 00:08:14.300 Let's imagine that we change the dividend policy and we decided to 170 00:08:14.300 --> 00:08:15.300 distribute 50% 171 00:08:16.400 --> 00:08:19.500 What happens to the balance sheet it's going to be modified, but it 172 00:08:19.500 --> 00:08:20.000 will balance. 173 00:08:20.900 --> 00:08:23.400 Second modification you remember 174 00:08:23.400 --> 00:08:26.400 that we pay 50% of the purchases immediately and 175 00:08:26.400 --> 00:08:29.500 50% with a one month delay imagine that we've 176 00:08:29.500 --> 00:08:32.800 been able to convince our suppliers to pay one hundred 177 00:08:32.800 --> 00:08:35.600 percent of the purchases in one month instead 178 00:08:35.600 --> 00:08:38.000 of 50% What's going to 179 00:08:38.200 --> 00:08:41.900 happen to the balancy, but more interestingly. Let's imagine 180 00:08:41.900 --> 00:08:44.400 that we make a mistake. Oh in June 181 00:08:44.400 --> 00:08:47.700 we forgot to account for income tax the balance 182 00:08:47.700 --> 00:08:50.300 it will be wrong, but it's going to balance. 183 00:08:51.200 --> 00:08:54.400 Much more complex, imagine that in 184 00:08:54.400 --> 00:08:57.200 the calculation of the production cost. We forgot to account for 185 00:08:57.200 --> 00:09:01.300 the depreciation of the machine in the production costs calculation. 186 00:09:00.300 --> 00:09:03.500 The balance sheet will be wrong. The 187 00:09:03.500 --> 00:09:06.400 p&l will be wrong. But the balance sheet 188 00:09:06.400 --> 00:09:09.800 will balance. Let's have a look at these four situations one after 189 00:09:09.800 --> 00:09:10.300 the other. 190 00:09:11.100 --> 00:09:11.700 first one 191 00:09:12.500 --> 00:09:15.400 imagine that we decide to distribute 15% of 192 00:09:15.400 --> 00:09:20.500 the profit the net earnings in June were 12,886 50% 193 00:09:20.500 --> 00:09:24.100 of that is 6,443. If 194 00:09:23.100 --> 00:09:26.500 we decide at the end of June to distribute 195 00:09:26.500 --> 00:09:29.300 it if you don't to the shareholders will have to show that 196 00:09:29.300 --> 00:09:32.900 in the balance sheet. It's going to be dividend payable. 197 00:09:33.500 --> 00:09:36.200 It's decided in June. It's going to be Pat in July, 198 00:09:36.200 --> 00:09:37.200 August or whatsoever. 199 00:09:37.900 --> 00:09:40.400 But if we decide to distribute it 200 00:09:40.400 --> 00:09:43.500 if it done we are going to reinvest Less in 201 00:09:43.500 --> 00:09:46.400 the retained earnings. You remember that retainer. This 202 00:09:46.400 --> 00:09:48.400 is earnings minus dividends. 203 00:09:49.200 --> 00:09:52.600 So they retainer Nicks are going to be reduced by the amount 204 00:09:52.600 --> 00:09:55.500 of dividend which is going to be paid 205 00:09:55.500 --> 00:09:58.100 to the shareholders. And if you don't 206 00:09:58.100 --> 00:10:01.500 which is not going to be reinvested in the shareholders equity. 207 00:10:02.200 --> 00:10:06.500 So retainer earnings are down by 6,443 and 208 00:10:05.500 --> 00:10:10.100 dividends payable is by 6,443. 209 00:10:08.100 --> 00:10:12.000 The total balance. 210 00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:14.800 It is the same. There's plus something 211 00:10:14.800 --> 00:10:18.000 here and minus something there the 212 00:10:17.500 --> 00:10:19.200 balance it is balancing. 213 00:10:20.500 --> 00:10:23.000 Second situation in which the total balance it 214 00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:26.600 is modified, even though the balance of the balance sheet 215 00:10:26.600 --> 00:10:29.300 is preserved. You have negotiated with your 216 00:10:29.300 --> 00:10:32.400 suppliers to pay them 100% of the purchases in 217 00:10:32.400 --> 00:10:34.700 one month instead of 50% 218 00:10:35.600 --> 00:10:38.800 What is a consequence of the balance sheet the accounts 219 00:10:38.800 --> 00:10:41.900 payable figure is going to be very much incremented. It's 220 00:10:41.900 --> 00:10:44.300 no more 50% of the purchases. It's 221 00:10:44.300 --> 00:10:49.400 100% of the purchases now. It's 50,960 which 222 00:10:48.400 --> 00:10:51.400 is the entire purchases of the 223 00:10:51.400 --> 00:10:51.800 months. 224 00:10:52.700 --> 00:10:53.700 that the first point 225 00:10:54.600 --> 00:10:57.300 now what is a second impact on the balance sheet 226 00:10:57.300 --> 00:10:59.200 it will show on the asset side. 227 00:10:59.800 --> 00:11:02.800 Because if you have postponed the payment of the 228 00:11:02.800 --> 00:11:05.900 50% of the purchases, you used 229 00:11:05.900 --> 00:11:07.900 to pair to your suppliers before. 230 00:11:08.800 --> 00:11:11.200 Now this cash is in your pocket. 231 00:11:11.800 --> 00:11:14.400 So you have more cash in your bank account 232 00:11:14.400 --> 00:11:17.600 simply because you did not pay your suppliers 233 00:11:17.600 --> 00:11:20.100 by the amount of money which shows 234 00:11:20.100 --> 00:11:23.200 in your accounts payable at the end of the month. So you have 235 00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:26.700 more cash which exactly compensates more accounts 236 00:11:26.700 --> 00:11:27.300 payable. 237 00:11:28.400 --> 00:11:30.900 What is interesting in these two situations is? 238 00:11:31.700 --> 00:11:34.200 The first alternative is that the compensation is 239 00:11:34.200 --> 00:11:37.800 going to show in the same column either assets 240 00:11:37.800 --> 00:11:39.400 or equity and liabilities. 241 00:11:40.200 --> 00:11:43.800 You have more dividend payable and you have less retained 242 00:11:43.800 --> 00:11:46.700 earnings plus minus. The resulting 243 00:11:46.700 --> 00:11:49.200 impact is Neil and the total balance sheet 244 00:11:49.200 --> 00:11:52.800 Remains the Same Sergeant alternative the compensation in 245 00:11:52.800 --> 00:11:55.400 one column will show in the other column. 246 00:11:56.100 --> 00:11:59.600 Then you're going to compensate accounts payable and cash for 247 00:11:59.600 --> 00:12:02.200 example, but then the balance sheet is 248 00:12:02.200 --> 00:12:05.800 going to keep on balancing which is extremely predictable. 249 00:12:05.800 --> 00:12:08.200 But the total balance sheet 250 00:12:08.200 --> 00:12:11.500 is going to be affected by the change in 251 00:12:11.500 --> 00:12:13.500 the value of these items. 252 00:12:14.200 --> 00:12:17.300 Now the next two steps are quite interesting because we 253 00:12:17.300 --> 00:12:20.100 are going to make a mistake. The p&l is 254 00:12:20.100 --> 00:12:23.500 going to be wrong the balance it is going to be wrong. But the 255 00:12:23.500 --> 00:12:26.300 balance it will balance imagine for example 256 00:12:26.300 --> 00:12:29.400 that we made a mistake and we forgot to account for 257 00:12:29.400 --> 00:12:32.500 taxes in June. So there is 258 00:12:32.500 --> 00:12:35.400 no increment in income tax payable 259 00:12:35.400 --> 00:12:38.200 because what is missing is 20% of the earnings before 260 00:12:38.200 --> 00:12:41.400 tax generated by our activity in the month 261 00:12:41.400 --> 00:12:41.800 of June. 262 00:12:43.600 --> 00:12:46.400 If the income tax payable is down by the tax which 263 00:12:46.400 --> 00:12:49.800 disappeared you have generated more earnings after 264 00:12:49.800 --> 00:12:52.400 tax because earnings before tax 265 00:12:52.400 --> 00:12:55.300 and the earnings after tax now and it's wrong 266 00:12:55.300 --> 00:12:56.100 are the same. 267 00:12:56.900 --> 00:12:59.500 You have not reduced the retainer earnings 268 00:12:59.500 --> 00:13:02.600 by the amount of tax. You should have paid and this 269 00:13:02.600 --> 00:13:05.400 decrease in a tax payable show in your contacts 270 00:13:05.400 --> 00:13:08.900 payable. The compensation is more earnings after 271 00:13:08.900 --> 00:13:11.700 tax and more retained earnings. So 272 00:13:11.700 --> 00:13:14.400 here the mistake is the amount of income tax. 273 00:13:14.400 --> 00:13:17.500 You should have accounted as tax payable in June. 274 00:13:17.500 --> 00:13:21.100 It is reducing the income 275 00:13:20.100 --> 00:13:24.000 tax payable and increasing the return 276 00:13:23.400 --> 00:13:25.700 and it's by exactly is the same amount. 277 00:13:26.700 --> 00:13:29.400 So you made a mistake the p&l is 278 00:13:29.400 --> 00:13:32.400 wrong because the bottom line is wrong the balance it 279 00:13:32.400 --> 00:13:35.400 is wrong because there are two items in the balance sheet 280 00:13:35.400 --> 00:13:38.400 which are wrong. But at the end of the day, there's no 281 00:13:38.400 --> 00:13:41.400 change in the total balance sheet and the balance 282 00:13:41.400 --> 00:13:42.100 it is balancing. 283 00:13:43.800 --> 00:13:46.500 Sagon mistake, which is a much more complex and 284 00:13:46.500 --> 00:13:49.400 sophisticated imagine that in June you 285 00:13:49.400 --> 00:13:52.500 forget to account for the depreciation of the machine in 286 00:13:52.500 --> 00:13:54.000 a calculation of the production cost. 287 00:13:55.300 --> 00:13:58.500 What's going to happen for impacts in the balance 288 00:13:58.500 --> 00:14:01.500 it the first one is obvious property plants and 289 00:14:01.500 --> 00:14:04.800 Equipment grows value no change 60,000 which 290 00:14:04.800 --> 00:14:07.800 is a purchase price of the machine but accumulator 291 00:14:07.800 --> 00:14:10.500 depreciation if you forget to depreciate in June, 292 00:14:10.500 --> 00:14:13.400 you have two months of depreciation instead of three. This 293 00:14:13.400 --> 00:14:16.800 is why your property plant and Equipment your tangible fixed 294 00:14:16.800 --> 00:14:20.100 assets net of accumulated depreciation is 295 00:14:19.100 --> 00:14:23.200 overevaluated and it's 58,000 296 00:14:22.200 --> 00:14:26.200 when it should be 57,000. So 297 00:14:25.200 --> 00:14:29.100 you increase your total assets by 1,000. 298 00:14:29.900 --> 00:14:32.900 The second impact is on the inventories. 299 00:14:33.400 --> 00:14:37.000 Because if you forget to account for depreciation you reduce 300 00:14:36.300 --> 00:14:39.800 by the same amount the production cost and 301 00:14:39.800 --> 00:14:41.900 the production cost per unit. 302 00:14:42.600 --> 00:14:45.300 This is why there will be an earned or 303 00:14:45.300 --> 00:14:48.300 evaluation of the inventories of finished goods at the end of the month. 304 00:14:49.200 --> 00:14:53.300 Here what You observe is 21,200 instead 305 00:14:52.300 --> 00:14:56.700 of 21,000,562. 306 00:14:57.300 --> 00:15:01.100 There is a difference of 362. 307 00:15:02.500 --> 00:15:04.400 Let's make a simple calculation. 308 00:15:05.100 --> 00:15:08.400 Depreciation figure which is missing is 1000. 309 00:15:09.400 --> 00:15:09.800 second 310 00:15:10.700 --> 00:15:15.500 the inventory level is under evaluated by 362. 311 00:15:16.200 --> 00:15:19.300 Out of 1000 you can deduct from 312 00:15:19.300 --> 00:15:23.400 that that 36.2% of 313 00:15:22.400 --> 00:15:26.100 the number of units produced in 314 00:15:25.100 --> 00:15:26.700 June. 315 00:15:27.300 --> 00:15:30.900 Have not been sold and show in the invatore 316 00:15:30.900 --> 00:15:32.000 is of finished goods. 317 00:15:32.700 --> 00:15:36.200 But if 362 of 318 00:15:35.200 --> 00:15:38.900 depreciation are wrongly under 319 00:15:38.900 --> 00:15:41.600 evaluating the inventory, what does 320 00:15:41.600 --> 00:15:44.900 it mean the net between this figure and 1000 is 321 00:15:44.900 --> 00:15:46.200 missing in the cost of sales? 322 00:15:47.200 --> 00:15:51.200 1000 minus 362 is 323 00:15:50.200 --> 00:15:53.400 exactly 600 and 324 00:15:53.400 --> 00:15:54.500 38. 325 00:15:55.300 --> 00:15:58.900 So the cost of sales have been wrongly decremented 326 00:15:58.900 --> 00:16:01.600 by 638. 327 00:16:02.700 --> 00:16:05.400 And this is definitely an over evaluation of 328 00:16:05.400 --> 00:16:07.200 the profit before tax. 329 00:16:07.800 --> 00:16:10.400 Now look at the consequence on the asset side 330 00:16:10.400 --> 00:16:14.100 of the balance sheet. We are and Julie increasing 331 00:16:13.100 --> 00:16:16.300 the property plant and Equipment net by 332 00:16:16.300 --> 00:16:17.200 1,000. 333 00:16:17.900 --> 00:16:20.400 And reducing the invitory by 334 00:16:20.400 --> 00:16:23.200 SRI Harrow 62 the difference between these two 335 00:16:23.200 --> 00:16:26.300 figures is 638 which 336 00:16:26.300 --> 00:16:29.200 is increase in a total asset, which is wrong. 337 00:16:29.900 --> 00:16:32.600 But the 600 and 38 is 338 00:16:32.600 --> 00:16:35.400 the increase in earnings before tax. 339 00:16:35.400 --> 00:16:38.400 What is the impact on the equity and liability side 340 00:16:38.400 --> 00:16:39.300 of the balance sheet? 341 00:16:39.900 --> 00:16:42.800 But if you're over evaluate your 342 00:16:42.800 --> 00:16:46.500 earnings before tax by 638, you 343 00:16:46.500 --> 00:16:49.300 are going to overevaluate your income tax 344 00:16:49.300 --> 00:16:53.400 payable by 20% of 638, which 345 00:16:53.400 --> 00:16:56.600 is 128. This is 346 00:16:56.600 --> 00:17:00.100 why your income tax payable is now 7,000 which 347 00:17:00.100 --> 00:17:04.300 is exactly 6,872 plus 348 00:17:03.300 --> 00:17:06.600 100 and 28. 349 00:17:07.500 --> 00:17:10.600 And you're over evaluate all so your 350 00:17:10.600 --> 00:17:13.300 bottom line your net earnings your earnings after 351 00:17:13.300 --> 00:17:17.000 tax by 80% of 600 and 352 00:17:16.800 --> 00:17:19.400 38, which is the earnings before 353 00:17:19.400 --> 00:17:21.700 tax minus income tax payable. 354 00:17:22.500 --> 00:17:25.400 And the difference is 638 minus 355 00:17:25.400 --> 00:17:29.400 128 which is 510. This 356 00:17:28.400 --> 00:17:31.500 is why your retain earnings are 357 00:17:31.500 --> 00:17:34.700 36,720, which 358 00:17:34.700 --> 00:17:39.600 is exactly the sum of 36,210 plus 359 00:17:39.600 --> 00:17:42.000 510. 360 00:17:42.600 --> 00:17:45.700 So you understand that both side of the balance sheet 361 00:17:45.700 --> 00:17:48.800 are going to be incremented by the 362 00:17:48.800 --> 00:17:51.700 increase in yearnings before 363 00:17:51.700 --> 00:17:54.400 tax, which is a consequence of making a 364 00:17:54.400 --> 00:17:58.000 mistake in a calculation of the production cost. I strongly 365 00:17:57.400 --> 00:18:00.500 suggest you go back to this calculation 366 00:18:00.500 --> 00:18:03.700 a little bit later quietly. But if 367 00:18:03.700 --> 00:18:06.800 you really understand the mechanics of 368 00:18:06.800 --> 00:18:09.200 this calculation, you are 369 00:18:09.200 --> 00:18:12.700 extremely comfortable with a mechanics of building 370 00:18:12.700 --> 00:18:16.100 the balance sheet as an integrated document 371 00:18:15.100 --> 00:18:18.800 with p&l and cash flow statement. Now, 372 00:18:18.800 --> 00:18:22.300 let's move to the third contribution financial 373 00:18:21.300 --> 00:18:25.100 analysis Financial Accounting. Why 374 00:18:24.100 --> 00:18:27.900 do we produce accounting statements simply 375 00:18:27.900 --> 00:18:30.500 to record what is happening in 376 00:18:30.500 --> 00:18:34.000 business operations so that we can understand what 377 00:18:33.300 --> 00:18:36.600 is really happening and we can take good 378 00:18:36.600 --> 00:18:40.300 decisions. You remember quite early 379 00:18:39.300 --> 00:18:42.400 in the process. I introduce. 380 00:18:42.700 --> 00:18:45.400 Financial analysis at the end of each 381 00:18:45.400 --> 00:18:46.200 and every month. 382 00:18:47.100 --> 00:18:51.100 Financial analysis is very useful process, but 383 00:18:50.100 --> 00:18:53.400 it is not simply reading the 384 00:18:53.400 --> 00:18:55.800 accounts and making simple calculations. 385 00:18:57.300 --> 00:19:00.800 It's not just about adding and subtracting figures. It 386 00:19:00.800 --> 00:19:03.500 is understanding the link between the figures and 387 00:19:03.500 --> 00:19:06.400 the reality of business operations. Let's 388 00:19:06.400 --> 00:19:08.300 take a very simple example. 389 00:19:09.500 --> 00:19:12.300 You remember that in May the gross margin is down. 390 00:19:13.300 --> 00:19:16.300 If you just observe that the gross margin is down. You're going 391 00:19:16.300 --> 00:19:19.200 to say something terrible, which is happening in a company, 392 00:19:19.200 --> 00:19:20.300 which is absolutely wrong. 393 00:19:21.100 --> 00:19:24.800 The reason why the growth margin is down in May 394 00:19:24.800 --> 00:19:27.300 is that in the cost of sales now, we 395 00:19:27.300 --> 00:19:30.500 show the production cost of these products which 396 00:19:30.500 --> 00:19:33.700 we manufactured in April and whose cost 397 00:19:33.700 --> 00:19:37.200 per unit is 26 dollars as opposed to 20 or 398 00:19:36.200 --> 00:19:39.700 19. Why because volume was 399 00:19:39.700 --> 00:19:43.100 low. So the explanation is volume. It's 400 00:19:42.100 --> 00:19:46.300 a business explanation to an 401 00:19:45.300 --> 00:19:47.600 accounting reality. 402 00:19:48.300 --> 00:19:52.200 Then you understand that mastering technical skills 403 00:19:51.200 --> 00:19:54.300 in accounting is not just 404 00:19:54.300 --> 00:19:57.600 about observing the past. It is also being 405 00:19:57.600 --> 00:20:00.800 good at taking decisions whose impact 406 00:20:00.800 --> 00:20:02.600 is going to show in a future. 407 00:20:03.700 --> 00:20:07.000 And that's why accounting is absolutely of 408 00:20:06.500 --> 00:20:09.400 strategic importance. It's of strategic 409 00:20:09.400 --> 00:20:12.600 importance for the company, but it's of strategic importance 410 00:20:12.600 --> 00:20:16.000 all so for you managers in business operations. 411 00:20:17.300 --> 00:20:20.800 If you just observe the figures and you don't understand the 412 00:20:20.800 --> 00:20:24.400 mechanics, you don't understand the rationality behind 413 00:20:23.400 --> 00:20:27.000 the financial documents. You're 414 00:20:26.200 --> 00:20:29.900 not going to be able to understand really 415 00:20:29.900 --> 00:20:32.100 what happens and you're not going 416 00:20:32.100 --> 00:20:35.600 to be able to take the best decisions for your business 417 00:20:35.600 --> 00:20:36.400 operations. 418 00:20:37.300 --> 00:20:40.700 So you understand that there are very big difference between two 419 00:20:40.700 --> 00:20:44.300 managers two operating managers one who 420 00:20:43.300 --> 00:20:46.600 understands accounting the other 421 00:20:46.600 --> 00:20:47.600 one who does not. 422 00:20:48.400 --> 00:20:51.500 Really understanding what's behind the figures 423 00:20:51.500 --> 00:20:55.000 is a competitive Advantage for you managers 424 00:20:54.100 --> 00:20:56.800 when you run your business operations. 425 00:20:58.400 --> 00:21:01.600 But then you understand that the information which is 426 00:21:01.600 --> 00:21:04.800 in your hands should be as accurate as 427 00:21:04.800 --> 00:21:04.900 possible. 428 00:21:05.900 --> 00:21:08.600 If you use wrong figures in 429 00:21:08.600 --> 00:21:11.800 your understanding of reality and in 430 00:21:11.800 --> 00:21:14.800 your financial analysis, you're going to make wrong 431 00:21:14.800 --> 00:21:15.200 decisions. 432 00:21:16.200 --> 00:21:20.000 This is why accurate information is absolutely fundamental 433 00:21:19.600 --> 00:21:22.500 together with a relevant information. 434 00:21:23.400 --> 00:21:27.000 You managers in business operations, you 435 00:21:26.200 --> 00:21:30.100 need to be provided with information, which 436 00:21:29.100 --> 00:21:32.700 you need in order to take your decision. 437 00:21:33.400 --> 00:21:36.600 This is why you need to have relevant and 438 00:21:36.600 --> 00:21:39.400 accurate information to assess a situation 439 00:21:39.400 --> 00:21:43.000 understand judge evaluate 440 00:21:42.400 --> 00:21:44.000 and decide. 441 00:21:45.300 --> 00:21:48.800 Last but not least a contribution on which I insisted 442 00:21:48.800 --> 00:21:51.700 throughout the three modules growth. 443 00:21:52.200 --> 00:21:55.300 Of course if revenues are growing you're quite 444 00:21:55.300 --> 00:21:58.400 happy because it means that your business model 445 00:21:58.400 --> 00:22:01.400 is right you create value for your customers. 446 00:22:01.400 --> 00:22:04.600 You have the right product. The price is 447 00:22:04.600 --> 00:22:07.900 probably quite okay, at least for your customers and 448 00:22:07.900 --> 00:22:11.700 you are validating the commercial marketing policy 449 00:22:11.700 --> 00:22:14.600 of the firm. This is great because this 450 00:22:14.600 --> 00:22:17.600 is a purpose of the company to serve its customers. 451 00:22:19.300 --> 00:22:22.200 And a performance point of view growth in 452 00:22:22.200 --> 00:22:25.300 revenues is also quite valid and 453 00:22:25.300 --> 00:22:26.300 good for the company. 454 00:22:27.100 --> 00:22:30.500 When you consider fixed costs, which 455 00:22:30.500 --> 00:22:33.400 are not affected by revenues, if you grow 456 00:22:33.400 --> 00:22:36.900 the volume you reduce a fixed cost per unit 457 00:22:36.900 --> 00:22:39.600 and then you improve the economic performance of 458 00:22:39.600 --> 00:22:42.100 the company, which is named economy is a 459 00:22:42.100 --> 00:22:42.200 scale. 460 00:22:43.300 --> 00:22:46.600 Take care because the fixed cost should be really fixed. 461 00:22:46.600 --> 00:22:50.200 And sometimes there are thresholds in 462 00:22:49.200 --> 00:22:51.000 the fixed cost. 463 00:22:51.700 --> 00:22:54.900 You remember the capacity of the machine is 5000 464 00:22:54.900 --> 00:22:57.700 units, but you need three operators from 465 00:22:57.700 --> 00:22:59.700 0 to 2500. 466 00:23:00.400 --> 00:23:03.400 If it goes beyond 2500 you need 467 00:23:03.400 --> 00:23:05.100 three additional operators. 468 00:23:05.800 --> 00:23:08.300 Then you understand that fixed costs are fixed 469 00:23:08.300 --> 00:23:10.600 within a range of figures. 470 00:23:11.200 --> 00:23:14.400 But if you cross the border, then the fixed costs 471 00:23:14.400 --> 00:23:17.600 are incremented by a lumpsum amount 472 00:23:17.600 --> 00:23:20.100 from three to six workers. 473 00:23:21.100 --> 00:23:24.200 I also mentioned depreciation as a fixed cost which is 474 00:23:24.200 --> 00:23:25.700 not entirely true. 475 00:23:26.500 --> 00:23:29.400 Depreciation is a consequence of buying a 476 00:23:29.400 --> 00:23:32.400 machine whose capacity is 5,000 units, 477 00:23:32.400 --> 00:23:35.000 but imagine that in a month, you have to 478 00:23:35.500 --> 00:23:38.200 produce more than 5,000 units. Then you need 479 00:23:38.200 --> 00:23:41.100 to increase the capacity of the machine all you need to buy a second 480 00:23:41.100 --> 00:23:45.000 machine in both case you are going to increase the depreciation. So 481 00:23:44.800 --> 00:23:47.400 depreciation is also a fixed cost 482 00:23:47.400 --> 00:23:51.000 which is fixed within a range beyond 483 00:23:50.300 --> 00:23:53.300 the range depreciation is no more 484 00:23:53.300 --> 00:23:56.000 fixed. It's incremented by the new capacity. 485 00:23:57.300 --> 00:24:00.600 So take care about fixed cost because fixed costs 486 00:24:00.600 --> 00:24:03.400 are fixed within a range and take care about what 487 00:24:03.400 --> 00:24:06.300 happened when you cross the border and you go beyond 488 00:24:06.300 --> 00:24:07.000 the threshold. 489 00:24:08.100 --> 00:24:11.800 We have so far observes a two positive impacts 490 00:24:11.800 --> 00:24:15.000 of growth even though there were some constraints 491 00:24:14.600 --> 00:24:16.600 unlimitation in seron one. 492 00:24:17.200 --> 00:24:19.900 The third one is definitely not positive. 493 00:24:20.700 --> 00:24:24.100 If you want to sell and produce more, what 494 00:24:23.100 --> 00:24:27.300 do you need to do increase your production capacity? 495 00:24:26.300 --> 00:24:30.100 You need to buy a machine. It's 496 00:24:29.100 --> 00:24:32.200 a cash conception you cash out the 497 00:24:32.200 --> 00:24:35.100 purchase price as a machine and what about the 498 00:24:35.100 --> 00:24:38.300 operating working capital requirements going to increase? 499 00:24:39.100 --> 00:24:42.700 You produce more you have more inventories. You 500 00:24:42.700 --> 00:24:45.200 sell more you have more cancerous of all 501 00:24:45.200 --> 00:24:48.200 you produce more you purchase more you have 502 00:24:48.200 --> 00:24:51.700 more accounts payable though. The operating working capital 503 00:24:51.700 --> 00:24:54.300 requirement is mechanically linked with 504 00:24:54.300 --> 00:24:57.600 volume of activity of the company and more 505 00:24:57.600 --> 00:25:00.500 operating working capital requirement is 506 00:25:00.500 --> 00:25:03.600 less cash you remember again, 507 00:25:03.600 --> 00:25:07.200 and again that funds from operations are ebida 508 00:25:06.200 --> 00:25:09.500 minus change in 509 00:25:09.500 --> 00:25:13.100 the operating working capital requirement more operating 510 00:25:12.100 --> 00:25:15.700 working capital requirement less funds 511 00:25:15.700 --> 00:25:16.400 from operations. 512 00:25:17.700 --> 00:25:20.300 Growth consumes cash. It's 513 00:25:20.300 --> 00:25:23.600 a fundamental statement for large companies and it 514 00:25:23.600 --> 00:25:27.000 is even more fundamental for startups. You 515 00:25:26.400 --> 00:25:29.700 are started you build a business model. You 516 00:25:29.700 --> 00:25:32.300 start selling your products and You observe 517 00:25:32.300 --> 00:25:33.400 a commercial success. 518 00:25:34.100 --> 00:25:37.300 So you are quite happy because it means that there's a product 519 00:25:37.300 --> 00:25:40.400 Market fit and it works. Absolutely great. 520 00:25:41.200 --> 00:25:44.800 But when you start selling your goods and services, maybe you 521 00:25:44.800 --> 00:25:47.300 have not yet Rich Break Even. You're a 522 00:25:47.300 --> 00:25:50.700 bit dies negative or you're a bit dies hardly positive. 523 00:25:51.500 --> 00:25:54.200 But if revenues are up you need 524 00:25:54.200 --> 00:25:57.800 to invest in capital expenditures cash out you are 525 00:25:57.800 --> 00:26:00.600 going to observe your operating working capital requirement, which 526 00:26:00.600 --> 00:26:02.000 is up cash out. 527 00:26:02.600 --> 00:26:06.100 And then negligible a bit minus capex 528 00:26:05.100 --> 00:26:08.600 minus increasing working capital requirement 529 00:26:08.600 --> 00:26:11.400 is going to give you a strongly negative free cash 530 00:26:11.400 --> 00:26:11.600 flow. 531 00:26:12.200 --> 00:26:15.100 Then you visit your bankers and your Bankers say I don't want to 532 00:26:15.100 --> 00:26:18.400 provide any debt because you're a bit is not large enough 533 00:26:18.400 --> 00:26:19.800 to pay the interest expense. 534 00:26:20.500 --> 00:26:23.300 So if Bankers are out of the picture, you have to visit the 535 00:26:23.300 --> 00:26:27.100 shareholders and what is very interesting is the 536 00:26:26.100 --> 00:26:29.300 more you grow the more you 537 00:26:29.300 --> 00:26:32.800 consume cash the quicker you have to visit your shareholders 538 00:26:32.800 --> 00:26:35.500 and the quicker as an entrepreneur you are 539 00:26:35.500 --> 00:26:36.800 going to be diluted. 540 00:26:37.700 --> 00:26:41.700 This is definitely one of the key issues startups 541 00:26:40.700 --> 00:26:43.600 and entrepreneurs are facing 542 00:26:43.600 --> 00:26:44.900 about growth. 543 00:26:45.900 --> 00:26:48.500 Now, let's go back to you as managers and 544 00:26:48.500 --> 00:26:51.400 business operations. Of course, you have to increase 545 00:26:51.400 --> 00:26:54.200 a bit down. Take care. They are a little 546 00:26:54.200 --> 00:26:58.000 bit of biases with indicator. But if you increase a 547 00:26:57.200 --> 00:27:00.400 bit, it's not enough. You also 548 00:27:00.400 --> 00:27:03.600 have to manage a cash conversion cycle the operating 549 00:27:03.600 --> 00:27:06.700 working capital requirements so that you can transform the Bida 550 00:27:06.700 --> 00:27:09.500 into funds from operations. And you also 551 00:27:09.500 --> 00:27:13.100 have to carefully select your investment projects. You 552 00:27:12.100 --> 00:27:15.500 can invest in capital expenditures today 553 00:27:15.500 --> 00:27:19.000 because you selected great investment projects 554 00:27:18.400 --> 00:27:21.600 yesterday, we charge generating a bit 555 00:27:21.600 --> 00:27:24.900 today, which you can transform into funds from operations and 556 00:27:24.900 --> 00:27:27.300 those great projects which you decide to 557 00:27:27.300 --> 00:27:30.500 invest in today are going to generate even more funds from 558 00:27:30.500 --> 00:27:33.500 operations in the future. That is the essence 559 00:27:33.500 --> 00:27:36.500 of your job. You operating managers as 560 00:27:36.500 --> 00:27:39.800 Fast Finance and Accounting are concerned. 561 00:27:40.800 --> 00:27:43.500 Now the progress report on the first three 562 00:27:43.500 --> 00:27:46.300 modules is over we can start 563 00:27:46.300 --> 00:27:49.600 with module 4 now you remember in module 3 564 00:27:49.600 --> 00:27:52.400 we invested in material in 565 00:27:52.400 --> 00:27:56.100 tangible investment. We bought a machine property 566 00:27:55.100 --> 00:27:58.400 plant and Equipment a real asset but 567 00:27:58.400 --> 00:28:01.900 as you know companies invest intangible fixed 568 00:28:01.900 --> 00:28:04.500 assets increasing capacity in a manufacturing 569 00:28:04.500 --> 00:28:08.200 footprint, but they also invest in intensible assets. 570 00:28:07.200 --> 00:28:10.500 It's going to be the issue of 571 00:28:10.500 --> 00:28:11.300 module 4 572 00:28:12.200 --> 00:28:15.600 That will be two imagerial investment one is 573 00:28:15.600 --> 00:28:19.200 going to be purchasing intellectual property a 574 00:28:18.200 --> 00:28:21.200 software. I will give you the description of 575 00:28:21.200 --> 00:28:24.900 that and invest in research and development so 576 00:28:24.900 --> 00:28:27.700 that we can design different new 577 00:28:27.700 --> 00:28:30.700 Innovative products to serve our customers. 578 00:28:31.700 --> 00:28:34.700 This will be the focus of module 4.
We Stand now at the end of the third module out of 5 of this course accounting for business operations During two modules.
We have simply sold products which we had purchased from A supplier.
But in the third module, I have introduced a very significant degree of complexity by creating our own manufacturing footprint.
The reason why I think now that it's very important to take a step back at the end of these first 10 months of business operations so that we can get back to the fundamental contributions of this course.
I truly believe that there are four fundamental contributions.
We have to Deep dive in the first one constant from module 1 to module 3 change in cash is not profit.
There is a significant difference and there are many reasons why which I am going to detail a little bit later on.
The second contribution is we have accounted for business operations.
And what is very important to understand is that it's a process which is very stable robust mechanism.
It's always the same story and it works very well and it's reliable.
third contribution accounting is about producing numbers but financial analysis is not about reading numbers and making simple calculations.
It goes much Beyond this very simple activity.
And again, I will detail that.
Last but not least the force contribution is something I repeatedly said during the stream modules growth is a very ambiguous process.
Is it economic performance? Of course, it's great because it's value creation for the customer.
But what are the potential negative impacts of growth? The first contribution is that definitely profit does not match with cash.
There are plenty of reasons, but I developed four key reasons why they don't match.
The first one is a concept whose name is operating working capital requirement.
Which comes from what? First there's a time lag between the moment you account for a revenue and the moment you cash from sales.
There's a timelap between the moment you purchase you can't for expenses and you pay your suppliers.
This is why because of this time lag you account for accounts receivable.
You can't for accounts payable and the end of the day cash and profits are not the same.
There's a third reason why which is about inventories and it is calculated in the operating working capital requirement.
In fact, there is is Cash in a warehouse, but it's not profit you need inventories because there is uncertainty on the demand there is maybe a lack of flexibility in the manufacturing footprint, but that the end of the day it's cash.
It's no profit not yet profit.
Then operating working capital requirement, which is inventories plus receivables minus payables is definitely the reason why at first profits and cash do not match you remember funds from operations is a bit duck profit minus changing the operating working capital requirement and six difference between profit and cash is definitely first operating working capital requirement change.
But there are some other reasons you remember in a module 3.
We are in April and we buy a machine and we start depreciating.
I told you that the investment itself is a cash flow, but the depreciation is not a cash flow.
It is a cost.
It is a conception.
It is a usage of the machine the progressive usage of the machine.
So it is a non-cash expense, which is absolutely fundamental to take into account in the calculation of the production cost.
This is a non-cash expense.
This is in the profit but it's not cash second difference.
There are some other non-cash expense.
For example, if you receive stock options, it's going to show in a p&l as labor related expenses, but it's no cash out for the company even when it is exercised.
Third reason let's go back to the machine.
It's an investment.
It's a cash outflow, but it's a cash out flow, which is not an expense.
It will generate revenues an income in the future because you are going to generate cost savings.
It's going to show in a p&l but later but the moment you account for the investment.
It has absolutely no impact in a p&l the moment you start depreciating the investment.
It has an impact on the p&l but it's not the capital expenditures itself as a cash outlay.
Same story for the financing financing is Cash in but it's not an income.
It's not a revenue and it's not an expense.
When you convince the banker to provide funds so that you can Finance at least part of the purchase price of the machine.
This is an inflow, but it does nothing to do with selling goods and services.
So it should not be in the p&l.
It is in the balance sheet.
It is in a cash flow statement.
It's not a profit.
It was the same story by the way in module 1 when we created the company, we provided the cash account of the company with capital.
It was cash.
It was capital and we had not yet started the business operations.
We had not yet started selling anything, but it was cash and it was financing.
You understand that there are many reasons including four key factors, why profit and cash they definitely don't match.
so on point these three statements are perfectly integrated.
You remember we first build the p&l the income statement revenues less cost in parallel.
We have a second film which is accounting for cash inflows and outflows.
Which is very interesting is that there is an interaction between period and cash for example accounts receivable.
You have the accounts receivable at the beginning of the month.
What is due from your customers? What do you add a p&l item revenues? What do you deduct the cash collection from sales? What do you get at the end the accounts receivable at the end of the month which is going to show in the balancing.
Through your understand that we are running to films in parallel.
One is a p&l how much profit or loss do we generate out of selling goods and services.
The second film is Cash in cash out.
What is absolutely fascinating and integrated is out of these two films we end on the common picture which is a talented at the end of the period so we have two films to build a picture.
This is a very well-oiled machine.
You understand that we always do the same from module 1 to module three, I progressively introduced complexity but that we account for inventories.
It's always the same thing when we account for accounts receivable.
It's always the same thing when we account for net earnings more or less distributed more or less reinvested in a retain earnings.
It's always the same thing though this mechanics.
This machine is extremely robust and stable.
One of the interesting consequence of that is the balance it always balances, whatever you do.
Let's take four examples two business modifications and two mistakes.
First you remember that we have decided to reinvest when her percent of the bottom line into retained earnings.
Let's imagine that we change the dividend policy and we decided to distribute 50% What happens to the balance sheet it's going to be modified, but it will balance.
Second modification you remember that we pay 50% of the purchases immediately and 50% with a one month delay imagine that we've been able to convince our suppliers to pay one hundred percent of the purchases in one month instead of 50% What's going to happen to the balancy, but more interestingly.
Let's imagine that we make a mistake.
Oh in June we forgot to account for income tax the balance it will be wrong, but it's going to balance.
Much more complex, imagine that in the calculation of the production cost.
We forgot to account for the depreciation of the machine in the production costs calculation.
The balance sheet will be wrong.
The p&l will be wrong.
But the balance sheet will balance.
Let's have a look at these four situations one after the other.
first one imagine that we decide to distribute 15% of the profit the net earnings in June were 12,886 50% of that is 6,443.
If we decide at the end of June to distribute it if you don't to the shareholders will have to show that in the balance sheet.
It's going to be dividend payable.
It's decided in June.
It's going to be Pat in July, August or whatsoever.
But if we decide to distribute it if it done we are going to reinvest Less in the retained earnings.
You remember that retainer.
This is earnings minus dividends.
So they retainer Nicks are going to be reduced by the amount of dividend which is going to be paid to the shareholders.
And if you don't which is not going to be reinvested in the shareholders equity.
So retainer earnings are down by 6,443 and dividends payable is by 6,443.
The total balance.
It is the same.
There's plus something here and minus something there the balance it is balancing.
Second situation in which the total balance it is modified, even though the balance of the balance sheet is preserved.
You have negotiated with your suppliers to pay them 100% of the purchases in one month instead of 50% What is a consequence of the balance sheet the accounts payable figure is going to be very much incremented.
It's no more 50% of the purchases.
It's 100% of the purchases now.
It's 50,960 which is the entire purchases of the months.
that the first point now what is a second impact on the balance sheet it will show on the asset side.
Because if you have postponed the payment of the 50% of the purchases, you used to pair to your suppliers before.
Now this cash is in your pocket.
So you have more cash in your bank account simply because you did not pay your suppliers by the amount of money which shows in your accounts payable at the end of the month.
So you have more cash which exactly compensates more accounts payable.
What is interesting in these two situations is? The first alternative is that the compensation is going to show in the same column either assets or equity and liabilities.
You have more dividend payable and you have less retained earnings plus minus.
The resulting impact is Neil and the total balance sheet Remains the Same Sergeant alternative the compensation in one column will show in the other column.
Then you're going to compensate accounts payable and cash for example, but then the balance sheet is going to keep on balancing which is extremely predictable.
But the total balance sheet is going to be affected by the change in the value of these items.
Now the next two steps are quite interesting because we are going to make a mistake.
The p&l is going to be wrong the balance it is going to be wrong.
But the balance it will balance imagine for example that we made a mistake and we forgot to account for taxes in June.
So there is no increment in income tax payable because what is missing is 20% of the earnings before tax generated by our activity in the month of June.
If the income tax payable is down by the tax which disappeared you have generated more earnings after tax because earnings before tax and the earnings after tax now and it's wrong are the same.
You have not reduced the retainer earnings by the amount of tax.
You should have paid and this decrease in a tax payable show in your contacts payable.
The compensation is more earnings after tax and more retained earnings.
So here the mistake is the amount of income tax.
You should have accounted as tax payable in June.
It is reducing the income tax payable and increasing the return and it's by exactly is the same amount.
So you made a mistake the p&l is wrong because the bottom line is wrong the balance it is wrong because there are two items in the balance sheet which are wrong.
But at the end of the day, there's no change in the total balance sheet and the balance it is balancing.
Sagon mistake, which is a much more complex and sophisticated imagine that in June you forget to account for the depreciation of the machine in a calculation of the production cost.
What's going to happen for impacts in the balance it the first one is obvious property plants and Equipment grows value no change 60,000 which is a purchase price of the machine but accumulator depreciation if you forget to depreciate in June, you have two months of depreciation instead of three.
This is why your property plant and Equipment your tangible fixed assets net of accumulated depreciation is overevaluated and it's 58,000 when it should be 57,000.
So you increase your total assets by 1,000.
The second impact is on the inventories.
Because if you forget to account for depreciation you reduce by the same amount the production cost and the production cost per unit.
This is why there will be an earned or evaluation of the inventories of finished goods at the end of the month.
Here what You observe is 21,200 instead of 21,000,562.
There is a difference of 362.
Let's make a simple calculation.
Depreciation figure which is missing is 1000.
second the inventory level is under evaluated by 362.
Out of 1000 you can deduct from that that 36.2% of the number of units produced in June.
Have not been sold and show in the invatore is of finished goods.
But if 362 of depreciation are wrongly under evaluating the inventory, what does it mean the net between this figure and 1000 is missing in the cost of sales? 1000 minus 362 is exactly 600 and 38.
So the cost of sales have been wrongly decremented by 638.
And this is definitely an over evaluation of the profit before tax.
Now look at the consequence on the asset side of the balance sheet.
We are and Julie increasing the property plant and Equipment net by 1,000.
And reducing the invitory by SRI Harrow 62 the difference between these two figures is 638 which is increase in a total asset, which is wrong.
But the 600 and 38 is the increase in earnings before tax.
What is the impact on the equity and liability side of the balance sheet? But if you're over evaluate your earnings before tax by 638, you are going to overevaluate your income tax payable by 20% of 638, which is 128.
This is why your income tax payable is now 7,000 which is exactly 6,872 plus 100 and 28.
And you're over evaluate all so your bottom line your net earnings your earnings after tax by 80% of 600 and 38, which is the earnings before tax minus income tax payable.
And the difference is 638 minus 128 which is 510.
This is why your retain earnings are 36,720, which is exactly the sum of 36,210 plus 510.
So you understand that both side of the balance sheet are going to be incremented by the increase in yearnings before tax, which is a consequence of making a mistake in a calculation of the production cost.
I strongly suggest you go back to this calculation a little bit later quietly.
But if you really understand the mechanics of this calculation, you are extremely comfortable with a mechanics of building the balance sheet as an integrated document with p&l and cash flow statement.
Now, let's move to the third contribution financial analysis Financial Accounting.
Why do we produce accounting statements simply to record what is happening in business operations so that we can understand what is really happening and we can take good decisions.
You remember quite early in the process.
I introduce.
Financial analysis at the end of each and every month.
Financial analysis is very useful process, but it is not simply reading the accounts and making simple calculations.
It's not just about adding and subtracting figures.
It is understanding the link between the figures and the reality of business operations.
Let's take a very simple example.
You remember that in May the gross margin is down.
If you just observe that the gross margin is down.
You're going to say something terrible, which is happening in a company, which is absolutely wrong.
The reason why the growth margin is down in May is that in the cost of sales now, we show the production cost of these products which we manufactured in April and whose cost per unit is 26 dollars as opposed to 20 or 19.
Why because volume was low.
So the explanation is volume.
It's a business explanation to an accounting reality.
Then you understand that mastering technical skills in accounting is not just about observing the past.
It is also being good at taking decisions whose impact is going to show in a future.
And that's why accounting is absolutely of strategic importance.
It's of strategic importance for the company, but it's of strategic importance all so for you managers in business operations.
If you just observe the figures and you don't understand the mechanics, you don't understand the rationality behind the financial documents.
You're not going to be able to understand really what happens and you're not going to be able to take the best decisions for your business operations.
So you understand that there are very big difference between two managers two operating managers one who understands accounting the other one who does not.
Really understanding what's behind the figures is a competitive Advantage for you managers when you run your business operations.
But then you understand that the information which is in your hands should be as accurate as possible.
If you use wrong figures in your understanding of reality and in your financial analysis, you're going to make wrong decisions.
This is why accurate information is absolutely fundamental together with a relevant information.
You managers in business operations, you need to be provided with information, which you need in order to take your decision.
This is why you need to have relevant and accurate information to assess a situation understand judge evaluate and decide.
Last but not least a contribution on which I insisted throughout the three modules growth.
Of course if revenues are growing you're quite happy because it means that your business model is right you create value for your customers.
You have the right product.
The price is probably quite okay, at least for your customers and you are validating the commercial marketing policy of the firm.
This is great because this is a purpose of the company to serve its customers.
And a performance point of view growth in revenues is also quite valid and good for the company.
When you consider fixed costs, which are not affected by revenues, if you grow the volume you reduce a fixed cost per unit and then you improve the economic performance of the company, which is named economy is a scale.
Take care because the fixed cost should be really fixed.
And sometimes there are thresholds in the fixed cost.
You remember the capacity of the machine is 5000 units, but you need three operators from 0 to 2500.
If it goes beyond 2500 you need three additional operators.
Then you understand that fixed costs are fixed within a range of figures.
But if you cross the border, then the fixed costs are incremented by a lumpsum amount from three to six workers.
I also mentioned depreciation as a fixed cost which is not entirely true.
Depreciation is a consequence of buying a machine whose capacity is 5,000 units, but imagine that in a month, you have to produce more than 5,000 units.
Then you need to increase the capacity of the machine all you need to buy a second machine in both case you are going to increase the depreciation.
So depreciation is also a fixed cost which is fixed within a range beyond the range depreciation is no more fixed.
It's incremented by the new capacity.
So take care about fixed cost because fixed costs are fixed within a range and take care about what happened when you cross the border and you go beyond the threshold.
We have so far observes a two positive impacts of growth even though there were some constraints unlimitation in seron one.
The third one is definitely not positive.
If you want to sell and produce more, what do you need to do increase your production capacity? You need to buy a machine.
It's a cash conception you cash out the purchase price as a machine and what about the operating working capital requirements going to increase? You produce more you have more inventories.
You sell more you have more cancerous of all you produce more you purchase more you have more accounts payable though.
The operating working capital requirement is mechanically linked with volume of activity of the company and more operating working capital requirement is less cash you remember again, and again that funds from operations are ebida minus change in the operating working capital requirement more operating working capital requirement less funds from operations.
Growth consumes cash.
It's a fundamental statement for large companies and it is even more fundamental for startups.
You are started you build a business model.
You start selling your products and You observe a commercial success.
So you are quite happy because it means that there's a product Market fit and it works.
Absolutely great.
But when you start selling your goods and services, maybe you have not yet Rich Break Even.
You're a bit dies negative or you're a bit dies hardly positive.
But if revenues are up you need to invest in capital expenditures cash out you are going to observe your operating working capital requirement, which is up cash out.
And then negligible a bit minus capex minus increasing working capital requirement is going to give you a strongly negative free cash flow.
Then you visit your bankers and your Bankers say I don't want to provide any debt because you're a bit is not large enough to pay the interest expense.
So if Bankers are out of the picture, you have to visit the shareholders and what is very interesting is the more you grow the more you consume cash the quicker you have to visit your shareholders and the quicker as an entrepreneur you are going to be diluted.
This is definitely one of the key issues startups and entrepreneurs are facing about growth.
Now, let's go back to you as managers and business operations.
Of course, you have to increase a bit down.
Take care.
They are a little bit of biases with indicator.
But if you increase a bit, it's not enough.
You also have to manage a cash conversion cycle the operating working capital requirements so that you can transform the Bida into funds from operations.
And you also have to carefully select your investment projects.
You can invest in capital expenditures today because you selected great investment projects yesterday, we charge generating a bit today, which you can transform into funds from operations and those great projects which you decide to invest in today are going to generate even more funds from operations in the future.
That is the essence of your job.
You operating managers as Fast Finance and Accounting are concerned.
Now the progress report on the first three modules is over we can start with module 4 now you remember in module 3 we invested in material in tangible investment.
We bought a machine property plant and Equipment a real asset but as you know companies invest intangible fixed assets increasing capacity in a manufacturing footprint, but they also invest in intensible assets.
It's going to be the issue of module 4 That will be two imagerial investment one is going to be purchasing intellectual property a software.
I will give you the description of that and invest in research and development so that we can design different new Innovative products to serve our customers.
This will be the focus of module 4.