December 2025 Vidcast // CoreWeave
When an IPO is not enough to finance explosive growth
The funds raised by CoreWeave during its IPO in March 2025 clearly did not guarantee sufficient financing for the company’s considerable growth. When EBITDA and equity are insufficient to finance capital expenditures (Capex), debt takes over, but its cost can skyrocket if, after an initial period of stock market euphoria, anxiety replaces enthusiasm among investors.
AUDIO VERSION
WEBVTT
1
00:00:01.095 --> 00:00:04.405
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast which will focus on a
2
00:00:04.435 --> 00:00:06.645
very prominent field right now.
3
00:00:07.195 --> 00:00:11.525
Data centers, more specifically those dedicated to training
4
00:00:12.385 --> 00:00:14.325
AI generated LLMs.
5
00:00:14.705 --> 00:00:17.125
The companies that best symbolizes this business
6
00:00:17.505 --> 00:00:21.205
and is currently the center of attention is core wave.
7
00:00:23.475 --> 00:00:25.415
The story starts in 2017.
8
00:00:25.865 --> 00:00:28.575
Three traders and a computer scientist.
9
00:00:28.765 --> 00:00:33.095
Experts are going to create a company around mining
10
00:00:33.235 --> 00:00:36.015
for cryptocurrencies, especially Ethereum.
11
00:00:36.555 --> 00:00:38.735
But in 2018, a year later,
12
00:00:38.735 --> 00:00:41.815
there will be a big crash in the cryptocurrencies business.
13
00:00:42.045 --> 00:00:45.495
Bitcoin value is going to go down by 80%.
14
00:00:46.125 --> 00:00:48.775
Then you have to experience a strategic shift,
15
00:00:49.315 --> 00:00:50.975
and in 2019 they are going
16
00:00:50.975 --> 00:00:54.335
to repurpose the capacity in cloud infrastructures.
17
00:00:54.335 --> 00:00:56.695
IT change the name, it becomes core wave
18
00:00:57.435 --> 00:01:00.415
and it's about computing, not just data storage,
19
00:01:00.725 --> 00:01:04.175
it's about high performance computing for ai.
20
00:01:06.645 --> 00:01:10.025
Now, even though there are some similarities between HPC
21
00:01:10.085 --> 00:01:13.625
and hyperscale, there are quite significant differences.
22
00:01:14.545 --> 00:01:16.385
Hyperscalers are very well known.
23
00:01:16.385 --> 00:01:19.665
Cloud suppliers, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft,
24
00:01:19.795 --> 00:01:21.225
Azure, and Google.
25
00:01:22.265 --> 00:01:26.465
HPC is very much about processing, not simply data storage
26
00:01:27.195 --> 00:01:29.385
processing for training AI model.
27
00:01:29.445 --> 00:01:32.185
So it's a kind of capacity as a service model,
28
00:01:32.485 --> 00:01:36.625
you run your capacity to these guys who need the capacity
29
00:01:37.085 --> 00:01:39.185
and the computing in order to train the models.
30
00:01:39.735 --> 00:01:41.985
It's about dedicated data centers.
31
00:01:42.495 --> 00:01:44.665
Very big difference in terms of capacity,
32
00:01:45.125 --> 00:01:47.625
energy consumption, safety needs.
33
00:01:48.125 --> 00:01:49.665
Now they can be independent
34
00:01:50.005 --> 00:01:54.385
or owned in core wave owned by Amazon,
35
00:01:55.065 --> 00:01:57.945
Microsoft, et cetera, the big hyper skaters
36
00:01:59.955 --> 00:02:01.575
In order to understand what it means.
37
00:02:01.935 --> 00:02:04.895
HPC, let's have a look at the project matrix
38
00:02:05.035 --> 00:02:09.815
of a traditional data center cluster AI unit processes
39
00:02:09.885 --> 00:02:14.135
from Nvidia H 100, for example, 14,000 GPUs,
40
00:02:14.835 --> 00:02:16.695
but you need plenty of energy,
41
00:02:17.495 --> 00:02:20.135
electricity capacity, 18 megawatts.
42
00:02:20.685 --> 00:02:22.895
What does it mean in terms of capacity?
43
00:02:22.895 --> 00:02:26.295
If you take a city electrical capacity with 18 megawatts,
44
00:02:26.295 --> 00:02:29.775
it's okay for 10,000 to 15,000 inhabitants,
45
00:02:30.555 --> 00:02:33.935
but the city does not use a full capacity full time.
46
00:02:34.755 --> 00:02:38.055
As far as HPC is concerned, the conception is much higher
47
00:02:38.055 --> 00:02:42.135
because it's 24 7, full speed, full capacity
48
00:02:42.805 --> 00:02:46.215
capital expenditure is about a billion from 900 million
49
00:02:46.235 --> 00:02:50.735
to 1.2 billion in the figure, you have 400 million
50
00:02:50.755 --> 00:02:52.335
for the GPUs for example,
51
00:02:52.755 --> 00:02:56.495
and 250 million for the 18 megawatt capacity.
52
00:02:57.195 --> 00:03:00.845
The problem is a rapid obsolescence in terms of technology.
53
00:03:01.465 --> 00:03:04.765
In three to four years your processes are outdated,
54
00:03:05.255 --> 00:03:08.365
which means that there is a very high operating risks,
55
00:03:08.705 --> 00:03:11.365
plenty of CapEx and short life.
56
00:03:11.915 --> 00:03:14.525
Then the only way to run the business is take over pace.
57
00:03:14.525 --> 00:03:17.125
There will be a client which makes a commitment
58
00:03:17.125 --> 00:03:20.565
of using say 80% of the theoretical capacity
59
00:03:20.565 --> 00:03:22.165
during 3, 4, 5 years.
60
00:03:22.955 --> 00:03:27.085
Then you take a dedicated SPV to welcome the data center.
61
00:03:27.505 --> 00:03:30.285
You have a customer and as you have some visibility,
62
00:03:30.585 --> 00:03:33.965
you can put plenty of debt with a return capital
63
00:03:34.385 --> 00:03:37.565
and the leverage the shareholder internal rate
64
00:03:37.565 --> 00:03:41.565
of return might reach about 20%, which is okay,
65
00:03:41.825 --> 00:03:43.245
but the risk is very high.
66
00:03:45.265 --> 00:03:48.095
Let's deep dive a little bit in the financial metrics.
67
00:03:48.875 --> 00:03:52.495
Our repeat capital expenditures, 900 million to 1.2 billion
68
00:03:53.055 --> 00:03:56.575
revenues only quote $300 million,
69
00:03:57.235 --> 00:03:59.495
so it's about 30% of the CapEx.
70
00:03:59.675 --> 00:04:02.575
The assets turnover is very low, which is a consequence
71
00:04:02.575 --> 00:04:04.455
of a very high capital intensity.
72
00:04:05.325 --> 00:04:07.375
Then if the assets turnover is very low
73
00:04:07.375 --> 00:04:09.655
and you want to generate a decent return on capital,
74
00:04:09.915 --> 00:04:12.095
you need to generate a high return on sales.
75
00:04:12.925 --> 00:04:16.055
Operating expenses account for about 80 million.
76
00:04:16.635 --> 00:04:17.975
Out of 300 million
77
00:04:17.995 --> 00:04:21.975
of revenues though they bid die 220 million,
78
00:04:22.305 --> 00:04:25.495
which is quite okay, but during three years
79
00:04:26.235 --> 00:04:28.695
and maybe you are going to keep on running the business,
80
00:04:28.715 --> 00:04:30.495
you're four, five to six,
81
00:04:30.875 --> 00:04:33.535
but you understand that for example, four years
82
00:04:33.675 --> 00:04:37.015
of 220 million is just a CapEx.
83
00:04:37.515 --> 00:04:40.455
So you break even on a cash point of view in four years
84
00:04:40.915 --> 00:04:44.575
and you make your bread and butter your INPV in year
85
00:04:44.725 --> 00:04:45.815
five to six.
86
00:04:46.005 --> 00:04:47.415
It's extremely risky.
87
00:04:48.275 --> 00:04:52.215
The bank is are providing 800 million, 80%
88
00:04:52.395 --> 00:04:54.655
of the financing, but why?
89
00:04:54.655 --> 00:04:55.775
Because of the take
90
00:04:55.835 --> 00:04:58.695
or pay, then you create a special purpose vehicle
91
00:04:59.315 --> 00:05:02.175
and financing belongs to a very specific field,
92
00:05:02.175 --> 00:05:03.575
which is project finance,
93
00:05:03.955 --> 00:05:06.415
not very traditional corporate finance.
94
00:05:08.665 --> 00:05:11.255
Where does core wave stands today?
95
00:05:11.995 --> 00:05:13.535
The technical status is
96
00:05:13.815 --> 00:05:16.295
provided by some information, the IPO,
97
00:05:16.295 --> 00:05:18.375
which took place in March, 2025,
98
00:05:18.835 --> 00:05:22.495
and we have the update October with Q3 2025.
99
00:05:23.195 --> 00:05:27.215
It seems that the company at that time owns 41 data centers.
100
00:05:27.425 --> 00:05:31.735
There are 100% dedicated to AI training.
101
00:05:32.405 --> 00:05:35.655
LLMs more than 250,000
102
00:05:36.165 --> 00:05:37.895
GPUs coming from nvidia.
103
00:05:38.635 --> 00:05:42.575
The traditional history called H 100 and the new Blackwell.
104
00:05:43.235 --> 00:05:46.775
So there is a very high supplier dependency
105
00:05:47.125 --> 00:05:50.655
because they buy the GPUs from Nvidia, 100% of them,
106
00:05:50.875 --> 00:05:52.335
but there is a kind of privilege
107
00:05:52.515 --> 00:05:56.055
and highly communicated relationship with Nvidia,
108
00:05:56.515 --> 00:05:58.765
so there's also a client's dependency.
109
00:05:58.905 --> 00:06:01.365
Not many companies are going to buy a service,
110
00:06:02.265 --> 00:06:04.525
OpenAI obviously Microsoft,
111
00:06:05.065 --> 00:06:08.845
but there are some other dependencies, a dependence on debt
112
00:06:09.685 --> 00:06:11.045
floating or fixed rate,
113
00:06:11.425 --> 00:06:14.805
and there is a dependence on energy costs which are quite
114
00:06:14.805 --> 00:06:16.565
difficult to forecast those days.
115
00:06:18.705 --> 00:06:20.885
Now this we have the financial metrics of a project.
116
00:06:21.055 --> 00:06:22.685
Let's have a look at the financial metrics
117
00:06:22.865 --> 00:06:25.165
of the company core wave as it is.
118
00:06:27.475 --> 00:06:29.505
First, let's have a look at the revenues.
119
00:06:30.125 --> 00:06:32.825
The growth is absolutely unbelievable.
120
00:06:33.425 --> 00:06:37.425
Revenues are growing by $200 million each and every quarter.
121
00:06:38.305 --> 00:06:41.025
A few quarters ago the revenues were 200 million
122
00:06:41.325 --> 00:06:44.745
to their eighties, 1.4 billion per quarter
123
00:06:45.525 --> 00:06:48.105
and it is absolutely mechanical increase,
124
00:06:48.105 --> 00:06:49.425
which is unbelievable.
125
00:06:49.715 --> 00:06:54.665
Again, what about the future as far as growth is concerned,
126
00:06:55.205 --> 00:06:57.425
the company is communicating on its backlog.
127
00:06:58.205 --> 00:07:01.505
The backlog Q3 24 was 15 billion.
128
00:07:02.125 --> 00:07:06.465
The backlog Q3 25 is more than 55 billion
129
00:07:07.085 --> 00:07:09.865
out of which 40% for the next 24 months
130
00:07:09.865 --> 00:07:14.745
for the next two years, if you take 40% of 55 billion,
131
00:07:14.845 --> 00:07:18.345
you divide by eight quarters in two years it's about
132
00:07:18.445 --> 00:07:22.705
$2.8 billion per quarter, so it is twice as much
133
00:07:22.765 --> 00:07:24.345
as a current ebit.
134
00:07:24.845 --> 00:07:26.705
So you understand that the perspectives in terms
135
00:07:26.705 --> 00:07:29.865
of revenue growth are absolutely huge.
136
00:07:32.085 --> 00:07:33.905
You could expect that the company is going
137
00:07:33.905 --> 00:07:36.065
to generate significant economies of scale
138
00:07:36.215 --> 00:07:39.465
with such a high growth rate and it's not the case.
139
00:07:40.125 --> 00:07:43.625
If you look at the operating expenses, the main one,
140
00:07:43.685 --> 00:07:45.585
the big figure is technology.
141
00:07:45.935 --> 00:07:49.465
It's about 50%, it was 50%
142
00:07:49.725 --> 00:07:52.425
and it's still 50% cost of sales.
143
00:07:52.755 --> 00:07:55.585
There were some economies of scale a few quarters ago,
144
00:07:55.585 --> 00:07:57.705
but now it's quite stable general
145
00:07:57.845 --> 00:07:59.145
and that mean quite stable.
146
00:07:59.355 --> 00:08:02.345
Sales and marketing absolutely negligible
147
00:08:02.645 --> 00:08:05.385
and growing a little bit as a percentage to revenues,
148
00:08:05.725 --> 00:08:07.225
so you generate economies
149
00:08:07.345 --> 00:08:09.425
of scale when fixed costs are fixed,
150
00:08:09.605 --> 00:08:12.545
but it seems that costs are quite variable.
151
00:08:14.215 --> 00:08:17.345
When you observe operating expenses which are quite stable
152
00:08:17.435 --> 00:08:20.025
percentage of revenues, you would anticipate
153
00:08:20.025 --> 00:08:23.305
that the EBIT itself, which is revenues minus of x,
154
00:08:23.685 --> 00:08:25.305
is a quite stable percentage
155
00:08:25.325 --> 00:08:27.185
to revenues and it's not the case.
156
00:08:27.765 --> 00:08:30.785
It was about 15% up to three quarters ago
157
00:08:30.965 --> 00:08:32.265
and then it dramatically
158
00:08:32.325 --> 00:08:36.225
and abruptly went down positive to negative,
159
00:08:36.905 --> 00:08:39.225
a little bit negative and then it's a little bit up
160
00:08:39.285 --> 00:08:42.985
but not 15 C, about three, 4%.
161
00:08:43.845 --> 00:08:45.305
Now, how do you explain that?
162
00:08:45.965 --> 00:08:47.945
As a matter of fact, the operating expenses,
163
00:08:47.945 --> 00:08:52.545
which I showed you are excluding stock based compensation
164
00:08:52.965 --> 00:08:55.565
and what happened is that stock based compensation
165
00:08:56.085 --> 00:08:58.285
dramatically increased during the first quarter
166
00:08:58.705 --> 00:09:00.285
for a very simple reason.
167
00:09:00.625 --> 00:09:04.855
The IPO, You should look at the evolution
168
00:09:04.855 --> 00:09:06.215
of stock-based compensation.
169
00:09:06.315 --> 00:09:10.455
The last quarters, it was absolutely negligible up to end
170
00:09:10.455 --> 00:09:13.775
of 2024, a few millions per quarter,
171
00:09:14.645 --> 00:09:19.255
less than 5% a few quarters ago are now down to 2%,
172
00:09:19.875 --> 00:09:23.455
and then because of the IPO, the cap distributed penny off
173
00:09:24.135 --> 00:09:26.535
restricted stock units, stock options and so on
174
00:09:26.535 --> 00:09:30.415
and so forth, and it amounted to 180 million just
175
00:09:30.415 --> 00:09:34.815
during the first quarter, which is about 18%
176
00:09:34.915 --> 00:09:37.415
of the revenues of the company at that time.
177
00:09:38.085 --> 00:09:39.175
Then it went down,
178
00:09:39.235 --> 00:09:41.655
but you understand that it explains the difference between
179
00:09:42.275 --> 00:09:45.335
the opex without stock-based compensation
180
00:09:45.475 --> 00:09:50.135
and the published opex difference between the adjusted EBIT
181
00:09:50.475 --> 00:09:52.495
and the actual published ebit
182
00:09:54.545 --> 00:09:59.145
adjusted unpublished EBIT were quite the same up to end
183
00:09:59.245 --> 00:10:00.465
of 2024,
184
00:10:01.365 --> 00:10:05.825
and then the adjusted EBIT stabilized to the level of 15%,
185
00:10:05.825 --> 00:10:08.025
which is a consequence of the figures,
186
00:10:08.025 --> 00:10:10.065
which I gave you a few minutes ago,
187
00:10:10.725 --> 00:10:14.465
and then the act four published EBIT went down dramatically.
188
00:10:15.085 --> 00:10:17.665
As I said, the difference is simply the stock
189
00:10:17.665 --> 00:10:18.705
based compensation.
190
00:10:21.505 --> 00:10:24.525
Now let's keep these adjusted figures adjusted from stock
191
00:10:24.525 --> 00:10:25.525
based compensation.
192
00:10:26.425 --> 00:10:28.325
The difference between adjusted EBIT
193
00:10:28.585 --> 00:10:30.365
and adjusted EBITDA is
194
00:10:30.365 --> 00:10:32.285
of course depreciation and monetization.
195
00:10:32.785 --> 00:10:35.445
The company is investing a lot in capital expenditures,
196
00:10:35.865 --> 00:10:38.965
but the COMPANIE is also investing a lot in research
197
00:10:39.025 --> 00:10:40.845
and development capitalized r
198
00:10:40.845 --> 00:10:43.005
and d expenses, one is depreciated,
199
00:10:43.225 --> 00:10:44.525
the other one is amortized.
200
00:10:45.305 --> 00:10:49.525
The EBITDA adjusted is about 60% of revenues
201
00:10:50.265 --> 00:10:52.965
and the EBIT adjusted is about 15.
202
00:10:53.225 --> 00:10:54.805
The difference is investment.
203
00:10:55.015 --> 00:10:58.245
These companies extremely capital intensive,
204
00:11:00.655 --> 00:11:03.715
But then the question is capital intensity, yes,
205
00:11:04.295 --> 00:11:05.795
as a percentage to revenues,
206
00:11:06.095 --> 00:11:08.355
how do you compare CapEx and revenues?
207
00:11:09.215 --> 00:11:11.595
If you look at the recent quarters, you understand
208
00:11:11.595 --> 00:11:15.715
that capital expenditure is about two years of revenues,
209
00:11:15.715 --> 00:11:17.715
which is absolutely dramatic,
210
00:11:18.415 --> 00:11:20.835
but you generate a high bid DA easy A bid,
211
00:11:20.955 --> 00:11:24.395
DA high enough in order to finance the capital expenditures
212
00:11:24.735 --> 00:11:26.995
and the answer is absolutely no.
213
00:11:27.305 --> 00:11:30.795
Even though the EBIT D is very much up in absolute terms
214
00:11:30.975 --> 00:11:33.475
as a consequence of growth in revenues,
215
00:11:33.975 --> 00:11:37.995
the E-P-D-H-S finances one third 35%
216
00:11:37.995 --> 00:11:40.755
of the capital expenditures, so you understand
217
00:11:40.755 --> 00:11:44.155
that growth is consuming financial resources,
218
00:11:44.875 --> 00:11:49.035
internal financial resources, about 35 of the CapEx.
219
00:11:49.335 --> 00:11:51.635
Now you need to find 65 somewhere else
220
00:11:53.905 --> 00:11:56.965
before we explore the way the company's financing is gross
221
00:11:56.985 --> 00:11:58.285
and capital expenditures.
222
00:11:58.875 --> 00:12:03.445
It's interesting to make a very quick stop at Q3
223
00:12:04.005 --> 00:12:07.525
communication, Q2 communication full.
224
00:12:07.525 --> 00:12:11.005
Your guidance for 2025 is five to
225
00:12:11.595 --> 00:12:14.325
five point 35 billion of revenues.
226
00:12:15.125 --> 00:12:18.725
Revenues are a little bit lower in the guidance which is
227
00:12:18.925 --> 00:12:20.485
provided in Q3 25.
228
00:12:21.345 --> 00:12:24.965
Of course, when revenues are down as costs are variable,
229
00:12:25.355 --> 00:12:27.805
well basically the adjusted operating income is going
230
00:12:27.805 --> 00:12:29.125
to be a little bit down.
231
00:12:30.565 --> 00:12:32.645
Interest expense is quite significant
232
00:12:32.645 --> 00:12:34.965
because there is a lot of debt and interest expense
233
00:12:35.425 --> 00:12:37.765
and interest rates are not negligible.
234
00:12:38.225 --> 00:12:39.885
But what is very interesting is
235
00:12:39.885 --> 00:12:42.525
to observe the guidance in terms of capital expenditures.
236
00:12:43.185 --> 00:12:46.725
The company was announcing during the first quarter of 2025
237
00:12:46.725 --> 00:12:49.365
that CapEx would be 20 to 23 billion
238
00:12:50.025 --> 00:12:52.405
and the guidance is reduced to 12
239
00:12:52.505 --> 00:12:54.925
to 14 billion just a quarter later.
240
00:12:55.545 --> 00:12:58.845
That's quite a surprise in terms of capacity investment.
241
00:13:01.455 --> 00:13:02.755
You remember that when you want
242
00:13:02.755 --> 00:13:05.795
to find on the non-car assets of a company,
243
00:13:06.255 --> 00:13:09.155
you can mobilize data and equity, but
244
00:13:09.155 --> 00:13:12.395
before that you can also mobilize your own operating cycle,
245
00:13:12.405 --> 00:13:14.355
which is a working capital requirement.
246
00:13:14.615 --> 00:13:16.235
Of course, when it is negative,
247
00:13:17.065 --> 00:13:19.195
when you look at the working capital requirement
248
00:13:19.195 --> 00:13:22.515
of core wave, it's operating current assets minus operating
249
00:13:22.515 --> 00:13:26.595
current liabilities and it's negative by 2.1 billion.
250
00:13:27.495 --> 00:13:31.915
The current liabilities operating are exceeding the current
251
00:13:32.015 --> 00:13:34.395
assets operating by 2.1 billion,
252
00:13:34.495 --> 00:13:37.715
so it's a resource which comes from the operating cycle,
253
00:13:38.335 --> 00:13:39.755
but that's not the end of the story
254
00:13:39.905 --> 00:13:44.675
because as the clients are paying in advance short term
255
00:13:44.815 --> 00:13:48.235
and long term, there's a deferred revenue which is more than
256
00:13:48.265 --> 00:13:50.715
$5 billion in the balance sheet of the company.
257
00:13:51.255 --> 00:13:54.715
So the operating resources are coming from the operating
258
00:13:54.715 --> 00:13:56.395
cycle are the combination
259
00:13:56.455 --> 00:13:59.035
of a negative working capital requirement
260
00:13:59.545 --> 00:14:02.355
without the deferred revenue 2.1 billion
261
00:14:02.815 --> 00:14:06.755
and the deferred revenue 5.4, so it's a total
262
00:14:06.855 --> 00:14:10.035
of 7.5 billion, which is extremely significant.
263
00:14:10.865 --> 00:14:13.435
It's not enough, but it's quite a lot of money.
264
00:14:15.805 --> 00:14:18.505
Of course, 7.5 billion is a very high figure,
265
00:14:18.525 --> 00:14:21.145
but it's far from being enough to finance the growth
266
00:14:21.165 --> 00:14:22.985
and the capital expenditures of the company.
267
00:14:23.695 --> 00:14:27.825
What comes from capital markets is 22.3 billion out
268
00:14:27.825 --> 00:14:32.505
of which most of it is debt, 19.5, Q3, 2025,
269
00:14:33.405 --> 00:14:37.385
and only in 2025 the company raised almost $9 billion
270
00:14:37.385 --> 00:14:41.145
of debt, so it's a very important actor on the bond market.
271
00:14:41.965 --> 00:14:45.985
The rest is about equity, but equity is 2.8.
272
00:14:46.135 --> 00:14:49.025
It's not exactly 2.8 issues.
273
00:14:49.125 --> 00:14:51.685
Equity shares issues about 1.5 billion
274
00:14:51.785 --> 00:14:54.485
and the rest is about secondary offerings,
275
00:14:54.825 --> 00:14:57.405
but secondary offerings is not cash for the cab.
276
00:14:58.185 --> 00:15:02.005
It sells from shareholders to shareholders,
277
00:15:02.305 --> 00:15:05.245
and so the shareholders are cashing in 1.3 billion.
278
00:15:05.535 --> 00:15:08.565
Those who sell their shares but not the cab itself.
279
00:15:09.145 --> 00:15:11.605
So cash for the company is 1.5 billion
280
00:15:12.265 --> 00:15:14.485
two series are absolutely significant.
281
00:15:14.785 --> 00:15:19.485
Series B, a first tranche of 200 and a second of 200
282
00:15:19.945 --> 00:15:23.245
and series C, which is very big with 1.1 billion.
283
00:15:23.965 --> 00:15:28.245
A very important investor is both in debt and equity.
284
00:15:29.055 --> 00:15:32.805
Manar and Manar holds more than 20%
285
00:15:32.825 --> 00:15:36.965
of the shares when the company is listed in March, 2025.
286
00:15:39.505 --> 00:15:42.215
Manar is a very well known actor operating in the industry
287
00:15:42.215 --> 00:15:45.535
of structured finance there were quite involved in the
288
00:15:45.695 --> 00:15:46.855
subprime business.
289
00:15:47.525 --> 00:15:50.335
They're also involved in arbitrary strategies
290
00:15:50.335 --> 00:15:53.775
and they started investing in venture capital in 2024.
291
00:15:54.645 --> 00:15:56.455
When you're involved in the subprime business,
292
00:15:56.555 --> 00:15:58.655
do you survive to the subprime crisis?
293
00:15:59.035 --> 00:16:03.055
The answer is yes. They were very much a structuring, CDOs,
294
00:16:03.205 --> 00:16:06.175
investments, et cetera, but they are quite ous people
295
00:16:06.675 --> 00:16:08.735
and they understood that there was something
296
00:16:08.735 --> 00:16:09.815
which was going to happen.
297
00:16:09.925 --> 00:16:13.055
This is why they hedge very much their position with credit,
298
00:16:13.305 --> 00:16:16.255
their fois, the CDS, and then they survived.
299
00:16:17.035 --> 00:16:20.015
Now they participated to series B and C
300
00:16:20.075 --> 00:16:22.495
and sometimes as the leader for call wave
301
00:16:23.075 --> 00:16:24.975
and they participated to the issue
302
00:16:24.975 --> 00:16:27.735
of the convertible bond issued by coal wave.
303
00:16:28.155 --> 00:16:31.375
Now the company has more than 20% of these shares.
304
00:16:31.915 --> 00:16:36.055
The value of their equity holding is $8 billion
305
00:16:36.125 --> 00:16:38.175
with a current stock price of coal wave,
306
00:16:38.175 --> 00:16:40.695
which is a very significant multiple.
307
00:16:42.975 --> 00:16:45.385
When you are extremely active on a debt
308
00:16:45.445 --> 00:16:48.665
and bond market, the question is which risk premium are you
309
00:16:48.665 --> 00:16:51.185
going to pay as a consequence of the property
310
00:16:51.185 --> 00:16:52.305
of default of your debt?
311
00:16:52.415 --> 00:16:55.225
What is your rating? There are two approaches.
312
00:16:55.555 --> 00:16:57.785
First, your ability with your cash flows
313
00:16:57.785 --> 00:16:58.905
to repair your debt.
314
00:16:58.975 --> 00:17:01.785
Cash flow is about ebitda, cash upbringing, profit,
315
00:17:02.605 --> 00:17:04.745
and so if you divide net debt by a bid,
316
00:17:04.925 --> 00:17:06.345
you get the financial leverage.
317
00:17:06.445 --> 00:17:09.665
How many years does it take in order to repair the debt?
318
00:17:10.445 --> 00:17:12.505
The second one is well,
319
00:17:12.505 --> 00:17:14.985
debt is financing your business operations,
320
00:17:15.465 --> 00:17:17.945
business operations, capital employed, capital employed
321
00:17:17.965 --> 00:17:20.545
as a value which is named enterprise value.
322
00:17:21.365 --> 00:17:23.785
Is the enterprise value high enough,
323
00:17:24.015 --> 00:17:27.265
significantly greater than your indebtedness?
324
00:17:27.485 --> 00:17:29.145
If it is the case, then
325
00:17:29.145 --> 00:17:32.305
with your enterprise value you can repair the debt.
326
00:17:32.525 --> 00:17:33.785
That's a financial structure
327
00:17:33.895 --> 00:17:37.025
that the gearing debt divided by equity.
328
00:17:39.375 --> 00:17:41.285
Let's start with the financial leverage.
329
00:17:41.595 --> 00:17:44.845
Financial leverage is net divided by EBDA,
330
00:17:44.845 --> 00:17:46.205
the cash operating profit.
331
00:17:47.185 --> 00:17:49.085
Now the question is debt.
332
00:17:49.345 --> 00:17:51.525
Of course it's the one we chose in your balance sheet,
333
00:17:51.825 --> 00:17:53.885
but what about EBDA?
334
00:17:54.305 --> 00:17:57.365
Do you take the current one? Do you take the historical one?
335
00:17:57.365 --> 00:17:58.605
Do you take the future one?
336
00:17:59.105 --> 00:18:02.365
The future will be certainly much more than the current one,
337
00:18:02.745 --> 00:18:05.405
but if you take the past, you take the last 12 months
338
00:18:05.425 --> 00:18:08.085
for example, you get six years of a bid DA,
339
00:18:08.665 --> 00:18:10.525
but it's not a very relevant figure
340
00:18:10.525 --> 00:18:13.365
because you remember the current revenue is
341
00:18:13.365 --> 00:18:14.485
about 1.4 billion.
342
00:18:15.145 --> 00:18:18.045
The average revenue for the next quarters
343
00:18:18.045 --> 00:18:21.045
for the next two years going to be 2.8 twice as much.
344
00:18:21.705 --> 00:18:23.765
Now, if you take the current bid DA,
345
00:18:23.765 --> 00:18:26.525
which is a bit more relevant than the last four quarters,
346
00:18:26.905 --> 00:18:28.045
you get five years,
347
00:18:28.705 --> 00:18:32.205
but basically even though the figure is a bit higher today
348
00:18:32.315 --> 00:18:36.205
than what it was a few quarters ago, it's not very high
349
00:18:36.675 --> 00:18:38.725
because the growth is there.
350
00:18:40.255 --> 00:18:42.315
Second perspective, the financial structure,
351
00:18:42.855 --> 00:18:45.715
the gearing debt divided by equity,
352
00:18:46.575 --> 00:18:49.155
the gearing dramatically went down when the company
353
00:18:49.775 --> 00:18:53.155
issued shares one public, the initial public offering.
354
00:18:53.695 --> 00:18:56.595
I'm going to explain you that in a few minutes though.
355
00:18:56.655 --> 00:18:59.395
You repair your debt with the equity which is raised
356
00:18:59.395 --> 00:19:03.275
and the gearing naturally goes down, it goes down to two,
357
00:19:03.695 --> 00:19:07.115
and then it is up a few quarters later to four
358
00:19:07.705 --> 00:19:10.195
that the gearing is up exactly the same
359
00:19:10.215 --> 00:19:11.875
as the financial leverage is up,
360
00:19:12.535 --> 00:19:14.755
but the gearing is that divided by equity.
361
00:19:14.765 --> 00:19:16.195
Which equity do you take?
362
00:19:16.195 --> 00:19:17.555
Do you take the one which is in the books
363
00:19:17.815 --> 00:19:19.555
or do you take the value of equity?
364
00:19:20.495 --> 00:19:23.115
And then what is very interesting is to understand
365
00:19:23.115 --> 00:19:26.555
that the value of equity is much more than the book value.
366
00:19:26.935 --> 00:19:30.435
The price to book is 18, which means that $1
367
00:19:30.495 --> 00:19:34.075
of book equity is evaluated $18 by the market.
368
00:19:34.745 --> 00:19:36.555
Then if you take the market gearing,
369
00:19:36.555 --> 00:19:38.875
which is debt non divided by book equity,
370
00:19:39.055 --> 00:19:42.675
but by market value of equity market capitalization,
371
00:19:43.215 --> 00:19:45.355
you understand that the debt structure,
372
00:19:45.695 --> 00:19:47.475
the gearing is a fraction.
373
00:19:47.985 --> 00:19:51.475
It's significantly less than one. What does it mean?
374
00:19:51.495 --> 00:19:53.875
It means that the financial structure is extremely
375
00:19:53.875 --> 00:19:56.875
conservative if you trust values.
376
00:19:59.405 --> 00:20:02.705
Now, what is in the mind of investors and rating agencies?
377
00:20:03.125 --> 00:20:04.145
Do they consider that
378
00:20:04.145 --> 00:20:07.465
because of the value of the company, the enterprise value,
379
00:20:07.965 --> 00:20:10.065
the debt structure is extremely conservative,
380
00:20:10.845 --> 00:20:13.345
or do they consider that even though there are some good
381
00:20:13.665 --> 00:20:16.105
prospects in the revenues, the financial leverage is high?
382
00:20:16.835 --> 00:20:19.145
Definitely the approach which is privileged
383
00:20:19.165 --> 00:20:20.905
by the market is leverage
384
00:20:21.495 --> 00:20:24.385
more than gearing in a decision making process.
385
00:20:25.625 --> 00:20:29.905
S and p is providing a rating which is B plus Moodys
386
00:20:29.925 --> 00:20:34.265
and FI equivalent BBB minus, so it's speculative grade,
387
00:20:34.455 --> 00:20:38.665
it's high yield debt, and that's quite interesting
388
00:20:38.665 --> 00:20:41.505
because you could interpret that with the fact
389
00:20:41.505 --> 00:20:44.945
that the market valuation is extremely volatile,
390
00:20:45.705 --> 00:20:47.065
absolutely not guaranteed.
391
00:20:47.785 --> 00:20:49.965
The one thing which counts if you want
392
00:20:49.965 --> 00:20:54.605
to repair your debt is cash and stock price is not cash.
393
00:20:54.835 --> 00:20:55.845
It's a valuation,
394
00:20:56.275 --> 00:20:59.245
it's a transaction which happened a few minutes ago.
395
00:20:59.505 --> 00:21:03.645
It is absolutely not cash to repair the debt. EBDA is cash.
396
00:21:05.825 --> 00:21:08.125
Now the consequence of a probability of default,
397
00:21:08.125 --> 00:21:09.845
which is perceived as quite high
398
00:21:10.065 --> 00:21:13.885
by the rating agencies on the capital market, the cost of
399
00:21:13.885 --> 00:21:14.925
that is going to be high.
400
00:21:15.465 --> 00:21:18.165
If you look at the last issues of the company
401
00:21:18.885 --> 00:21:20.725
communicated in the regulated information,
402
00:21:21.225 --> 00:21:24.725
the interest rate is nine to 10%,
403
00:21:25.015 --> 00:21:27.805
which is significantly higher than the governed bond rate.
404
00:21:27.855 --> 00:21:31.805
There is a very high risk premium, very high probability
405
00:21:31.825 --> 00:21:34.245
of default in the valuation of the bonds.
406
00:21:36.785 --> 00:21:38.725
You understand that the cost of that is quite high,
407
00:21:38.725 --> 00:21:40.805
which is consistent with the rating of the company.
408
00:21:41.545 --> 00:21:44.285
But what is very interesting is to observe the evolution
409
00:21:44.285 --> 00:21:46.965
of the perception of the bond market
410
00:21:47.505 --> 00:21:51.005
of the investors in the bonds in terms of risk,
411
00:21:51.745 --> 00:21:53.845
and then there is a very nice way to observe that,
412
00:21:53.845 --> 00:21:56.085
which is a credit de swap market.
413
00:21:56.825 --> 00:22:00.325
The cost of the CDS is what you are ready to pay in order
414
00:22:00.345 --> 00:22:03.805
to make sure that your investment in the bond is quite safe.
415
00:22:04.265 --> 00:22:05.405
You remember what happened
416
00:22:05.405 --> 00:22:09.605
with the CDS market when the subprime crisis uh
417
00:22:10.245 --> 00:22:12.925
exploded and it's interesting to observe what happened
418
00:22:12.925 --> 00:22:16.005
to a rle and coal wave the last three months
419
00:22:16.565 --> 00:22:19.525
starting in September for a rockle,
420
00:22:19.825 --> 00:22:21.805
the five year born and 10 year born.
421
00:22:22.035 --> 00:22:26.085
This credit Defo swap was half a percent a little bit more
422
00:22:26.465 --> 00:22:30.165
and it doubled to one and 1.5%
423
00:22:30.825 --> 00:22:33.765
and you observe what happened to the stock price of Oracle,
424
00:22:33.765 --> 00:22:37.765
which is very much involved in data centers with a lot of
425
00:22:37.765 --> 00:22:40.365
that in the balance sheet for coal wave,
426
00:22:40.555 --> 00:22:41.885
it's even more dramatic.
427
00:22:42.585 --> 00:22:46.285
The credit falls to up rate in September was 4%,
428
00:22:46.395 --> 00:22:48.525
4.5% depending on the maturity,
429
00:22:48.905 --> 00:22:52.725
and today it's 6.5, 7.5%.
430
00:22:53.225 --> 00:22:55.285
So what is perceived by the market is
431
00:22:55.285 --> 00:22:57.565
that it's extremely risky business
432
00:22:57.985 --> 00:23:00.685
and with a huge impact on your ability
433
00:23:00.745 --> 00:23:03.125
to repetitive debt on the property of default.
434
00:23:05.655 --> 00:23:07.295
I mentioned that the company went public
435
00:23:07.295 --> 00:23:09.295
during the first quarter of 2025.
436
00:23:09.955 --> 00:23:11.775
It happened in March, 2025
437
00:23:11.875 --> 00:23:13.695
and the price which was proposed
438
00:23:13.695 --> 00:23:16.735
to the market is $40 per share.
439
00:23:17.275 --> 00:23:20.895
The company issued 37.6 million shares, which is an increase
440
00:23:21.035 --> 00:23:23.735
by 9% of the number of shares outstanding,
441
00:23:24.475 --> 00:23:25.735
one multiplied by the other.
442
00:23:25.795 --> 00:23:28.335
It gives you uh, the amount of money which is raised
443
00:23:28.335 --> 00:23:30.695
by the company from the market, 1.5 billion,
444
00:23:31.395 --> 00:23:33.255
but they reduced very much ambition.
445
00:23:33.275 --> 00:23:35.935
The initial ambitions were about 4 billion
446
00:23:36.475 --> 00:23:37.495
and they were not sure
447
00:23:37.495 --> 00:23:40.295
that the market would accept such a high amount.
448
00:23:41.045 --> 00:23:44.295
Then they redo their ambitions to 1.5 and it was a success,
449
00:23:45.025 --> 00:23:47.005
but a success in terms of liquidity,
450
00:23:47.105 --> 00:23:48.845
not very much in terms of stock price.
451
00:23:48.945 --> 00:23:53.285
The closing price, the first day of listing is $40,
452
00:23:53.455 --> 00:23:54.685
which means that the company
453
00:23:55.325 --> 00:23:57.205
accepted the price but not more.
454
00:23:59.375 --> 00:24:01.035
What's very interesting is to understand
455
00:24:01.035 --> 00:24:05.035
that in the ordinary shares they are ahas and B shares.
456
00:24:05.325 --> 00:24:07.915
There are 300 million of ahas each
457
00:24:07.915 --> 00:24:10.795
and every share hold one voting right,
458
00:24:11.495 --> 00:24:14.475
118 million B shares each
459
00:24:14.475 --> 00:24:16.955
and every B share has 10 voting rights
460
00:24:17.335 --> 00:24:18.795
and there are reserves as a founders,
461
00:24:18.805 --> 00:24:22.635
which is very traditional in the so-called new economy.
462
00:24:22.935 --> 00:24:25.515
The shares which were offered are a shares.
463
00:24:25.975 --> 00:24:29.595
So of course the founders were diluted in terms of
464
00:24:30.255 --> 00:24:31.435
net asset value,
465
00:24:31.695 --> 00:24:35.395
but they were not diluted at all in terms of voting rights
466
00:24:35.395 --> 00:24:38.035
and they keep the control is 80% of the shares
467
00:24:40.125 --> 00:24:41.535
Shortly after its listing.
468
00:24:41.685 --> 00:24:44.335
Coal Wave started discussions with core scientific
469
00:24:44.475 --> 00:24:47.695
to buy core scientific core scientific company,
470
00:24:47.825 --> 00:24:49.695
which was created the same year
471
00:24:49.755 --> 00:24:53.215
as Coal Wave in 2017 was the same business model
472
00:24:53.275 --> 00:24:54.655
mining for cryptos.
473
00:24:55.275 --> 00:24:57.575
The company experienced very big problems
474
00:24:57.715 --> 00:25:01.455
and put itself under the protection of chapter 11 in 2022,
475
00:25:02.155 --> 00:25:04.455
crypto and energy cost
476
00:25:05.035 --> 00:25:09.615
and the company was ED to NASDAQ in 2024.
477
00:25:10.205 --> 00:25:13.655
Same s pivot HPC for ai,
478
00:25:14.195 --> 00:25:17.055
but the very key advantage for cost scientific
479
00:25:17.155 --> 00:25:20.895
and extremely reliable and efficient access to energy.
480
00:25:21.555 --> 00:25:24.655
If you look at the existing capacity plus projects under
481
00:25:24.685 --> 00:25:27.455
development, it's most at two gigawatt
482
00:25:27.455 --> 00:25:30.935
and you remember it's absolutely emal for this business,
483
00:25:31.145 --> 00:25:34.335
which is consuming GPUs from Nvidia
484
00:25:34.515 --> 00:25:36.615
but also a lot of electricity,
485
00:25:39.125 --> 00:25:40.935
Coal wave and core scientific.
486
00:25:41.085 --> 00:25:42.615
They know each other quite well
487
00:25:43.045 --> 00:25:46.615
because coal wave is leasing capacity to core scientific.
488
00:25:47.515 --> 00:25:50.375
In fact, the one is in tenant, the other one is a landlord.
489
00:25:51.005 --> 00:25:54.255
When you sign a long term contract with a kind of uh,
490
00:25:54.345 --> 00:25:55.855
lease commitment, you also have
491
00:25:55.855 --> 00:25:57.175
to show it on the balance sheet.
492
00:25:57.175 --> 00:25:59.215
This is IFRS 16.
493
00:25:59.755 --> 00:26:03.575
You discount the lease payments which are committed
494
00:26:04.235 --> 00:26:07.535
and then it's an amount which is absolutely not negligible.
495
00:26:07.605 --> 00:26:12.055
It's $3 billion in the IPO prospectus end of Q3, the 10 Q,
496
00:26:12.435 --> 00:26:16.335
nearly $5 billion and then Core Wave
497
00:26:16.435 --> 00:26:18.095
and discloses that they're going
498
00:26:18.095 --> 00:26:22.975
to internalize $12 billion in lease payments plus
499
00:26:23.115 --> 00:26:25.455
and wall synergies between the two companies,
500
00:26:25.485 --> 00:26:27.575
500 million per year, et cetera.
501
00:26:27.875 --> 00:26:30.175
But you understand that the rationality
502
00:26:30.515 --> 00:26:33.415
for core wave is this kind of lease flexibility,
503
00:26:33.985 --> 00:26:37.055
especially if there is uncertainty in the demand.
504
00:26:37.435 --> 00:26:39.655
You analyze the lease payments
505
00:26:39.675 --> 00:26:42.055
and then you don't have to show huge losses.
506
00:26:42.935 --> 00:26:45.725
Press access to energy, press size
507
00:26:46.025 --> 00:26:47.605
and then bargaining power.
508
00:26:47.905 --> 00:26:50.405
You understand the rationality for Coal wave.
509
00:26:52.815 --> 00:26:55.785
Unfortunately for Coal Wave, this uh,
510
00:26:55.815 --> 00:26:57.425
deal which was quite favorable
511
00:26:57.425 --> 00:26:59.145
for them did not go to the end.
512
00:27:00.045 --> 00:27:02.465
The companies listed in March, 2025,
513
00:27:02.525 --> 00:27:04.345
the stock price is skyrocketing
514
00:27:04.345 --> 00:27:06.545
and in July, 2025 they make an offer.
515
00:27:07.335 --> 00:27:10.905
They evaluate Core Scientific at $9 billion
516
00:27:11.605 --> 00:27:13.785
and it's an all stock transaction, so they're going
517
00:27:13.785 --> 00:27:14.985
to pay with their own shares.
518
00:27:15.725 --> 00:27:19.585
The stock price which is offered for Car Scientific paid
519
00:27:19.655 --> 00:27:23.265
with Core Wave stocks is $20.40 per share,
520
00:27:23.475 --> 00:27:27.745
which was a premium of 66% against the last
521
00:27:28.095 --> 00:27:29.225
days of stock prices.
522
00:27:29.965 --> 00:27:33.825
The price of Core Wave at that time is speaking at 165,
523
00:27:34.445 --> 00:27:35.745
so you understand that they are going
524
00:27:35.745 --> 00:27:40.625
to offer 0.1235 call wave shares
525
00:27:40.645 --> 00:27:44.145
for one core scientific shares end of October.
526
00:27:44.415 --> 00:27:48.745
Core wave stock price is down from 1 65 to 1 33
527
00:27:49.325 --> 00:27:52.025
and then the evaluation of Core Scientific is no more.
528
00:27:52.025 --> 00:27:54.785
9 billion is 7.3 billion,
529
00:27:55.445 --> 00:27:57.705
but there are some estimates considering
530
00:27:57.735 --> 00:28:00.865
that Core Scientific is worth 11 billion
531
00:28:01.165 --> 00:28:03.665
and certainly not seven points, 3 billion.
532
00:28:04.735 --> 00:28:07.905
When Core Scientific withdraws from the deal at the end
533
00:28:07.905 --> 00:28:11.825
of October, core wave is at $82 per share.
534
00:28:12.085 --> 00:28:14.465
So it's quite rational for Core Scientific
535
00:28:14.485 --> 00:28:17.665
to say either you change a conversion price,
536
00:28:17.805 --> 00:28:21.385
you change the rate at which you are going to buy our shares
537
00:28:21.645 --> 00:28:23.585
or we withdraw and they withdrew.
538
00:28:25.415 --> 00:28:27.995
Now it's quite interesting to put all the pieces together
539
00:28:28.055 --> 00:28:30.435
and observe what happens with stock price of coal wave.
540
00:28:30.435 --> 00:28:35.235
Since the listing, the company is listed at $40 per
541
00:28:35.235 --> 00:28:38.835
share, not many changes from March to May,
542
00:28:38.935 --> 00:28:43.795
and then the stock price skyrocketing get to a peak in June,
543
00:28:44.065 --> 00:28:47.115
July and at that time they start a discussion
544
00:28:47.115 --> 00:28:48.155
with Core Scientific
545
00:28:48.175 --> 00:28:51.915
and they make the offer then the stock price goes down, get
546
00:28:51.935 --> 00:28:55.915
to a low point, which is September, 1890,
547
00:28:56.415 --> 00:28:59.635
and then interestingly you remember that the CDS, the cost
548
00:28:59.635 --> 00:29:02.155
of the CDS is up starting in September.
549
00:29:02.855 --> 00:29:05.835
In the meantime, the stock price is back
550
00:29:05.895 --> 00:29:08.955
to a very high level showing a return
551
00:29:08.955 --> 00:29:12.075
of 250% as opposed
552
00:29:12.075 --> 00:29:15.115
to the stock price when the company is listed.
553
00:29:15.815 --> 00:29:18.515
So you have the probability of de default of the debt,
554
00:29:18.515 --> 00:29:21.635
which is up in the meantime the stock price which is up,
555
00:29:21.725 --> 00:29:23.995
which means that the company is investors,
556
00:29:24.455 --> 00:29:25.955
the financial analysts,
557
00:29:26.185 --> 00:29:29.675
they don't trust the stock price when it is about assessing
558
00:29:29.815 --> 00:29:31.435
the probability of deferred of the dead.
559
00:29:32.185 --> 00:29:35.915
Then after this second peak, it's down and it's down
560
00:29:35.915 --> 00:29:39.515
because of a core scientific deal which does not work
561
00:29:39.655 --> 00:29:40.995
and then it's further down
562
00:29:41.045 --> 00:29:45.445
because of the announcement in Q3, you reduce the revenues
563
00:29:45.445 --> 00:29:48.205
and the guidance, you reduce the operating income
564
00:29:48.265 --> 00:29:50.245
and you reduce the capital expenditures
565
00:29:50.665 --> 00:29:54.045
and today it's plus 100 something percent
566
00:29:54.065 --> 00:29:55.245
as opposed to stock price.
567
00:29:55.395 --> 00:29:59.285
When the company is issued Each's 80 something against 40.
568
00:29:59.945 --> 00:30:03.205
In the meantime, the NASDAQ is up by 36%,
569
00:30:03.205 --> 00:30:05.805
so it's not bad deal for the investors,
570
00:30:06.265 --> 00:30:09.525
but you understand that there was quite a lot of volatility,
571
00:30:10.055 --> 00:30:14.735
especially this last month Quite recently
572
00:30:14.875 --> 00:30:17.655
and the age of December, 2025.
573
00:30:17.835 --> 00:30:20.375
The company announces another debt issue,
574
00:30:20.555 --> 00:30:23.735
but it's not a straight traditional classical debt.
575
00:30:24.165 --> 00:30:27.895
It's a hybrid convertible bonds, so it's a debt
576
00:30:27.895 --> 00:30:30.215
to debt which can be converted into equity.
577
00:30:30.315 --> 00:30:32.295
The stock price is high enough at maturity.
578
00:30:33.115 --> 00:30:36.135
The initial amount which is offers $2 billion.
579
00:30:36.195 --> 00:30:38.695
It will be an overall allocation, a green shoe,
580
00:30:39.195 --> 00:30:40.895
$2.25 billion.
581
00:30:40.955 --> 00:30:44.455
At the em. The maturity is September, 2031
582
00:30:45.075 --> 00:30:48.015
and the coupon is 1.75 cm.
583
00:30:48.475 --> 00:30:51.575
You remember that for the straight debt it was nine to 10%.
584
00:30:51.715 --> 00:30:53.935
Now one of the main advantages
585
00:30:53.955 --> 00:30:57.535
of issuing convertible bond is you redo the cost of debt.
586
00:30:58.435 --> 00:31:00.695
The other advantages are you are going
587
00:31:00.695 --> 00:31:02.375
to postpone the dilution
588
00:31:02.515 --> 00:31:04.855
and you're going to reduce the dilution
589
00:31:05.555 --> 00:31:07.135
and this is a reason is
590
00:31:07.135 --> 00:31:10.095
because the company is issuing the bond at a nominal value,
591
00:31:10.095 --> 00:31:11.535
which is more than a stock price
592
00:31:12.195 --> 00:31:15.215
and the actual conversion will take place at maturity
593
00:31:15.355 --> 00:31:18.775
and now today the nominal of the bond is $1,000.
594
00:31:19.195 --> 00:31:20.375
The conversion rate,
595
00:31:20.385 --> 00:31:22.895
which is a final adjustment when you issue the bond
596
00:31:23.435 --> 00:31:25.775
is 9.2764.
597
00:31:26.395 --> 00:31:31.135
The breakeven is $107.80, which is
598
00:31:31.685 --> 00:31:34.655
exactly 1000 divided by the conversion rate
599
00:31:35.235 --> 00:31:39.855
and if you compare 1 0 7 0.8 with a current stock price
600
00:31:40.235 --> 00:31:44.095
of $88 when the company issuing the debt,
601
00:31:44.525 --> 00:31:49.255
it's a premium of only 23%, only 23%
602
00:31:49.355 --> 00:31:51.775
and the maturity of six euro.
603
00:31:52.275 --> 00:31:55.255
So you understand that it's absolutely not aggressive
604
00:31:55.515 --> 00:31:57.415
and it's going to be quite a great success.
605
00:31:59.865 --> 00:32:03.475
It's interesting to observe how on an accounting point
606
00:32:03.475 --> 00:32:06.915
of view the financial analysts are treating the convertible
607
00:32:06.985 --> 00:32:08.235
bond in the balance sheet.
608
00:32:08.905 --> 00:32:12.755
Well, first, the option of the convertible bond is out
609
00:32:12.755 --> 00:32:15.075
of the Monet because the stock price is less than the break
610
00:32:15.075 --> 00:32:19.955
even of 107.8, which we calculated, so it's treated as debt,
611
00:32:20.435 --> 00:32:22.235
straight debt, but if the stock price goes up,
612
00:32:22.265 --> 00:32:24.915
then the probability that the bond is converted
613
00:32:24.915 --> 00:32:25.955
to shares higher
614
00:32:26.695 --> 00:32:28.195
and the option is in the money,
615
00:32:28.865 --> 00:32:31.555
then the financial analysts are going to put part
616
00:32:31.555 --> 00:32:35.715
of the debt in equity and the rest of it remains as debt.
617
00:32:36.505 --> 00:32:39.685
Then if you reduce debt, you reduce the financial leverage,
618
00:32:39.705 --> 00:32:40.965
you reduce the gearing
619
00:32:41.425 --> 00:32:44.165
and then this is quite good for the probability
620
00:32:44.165 --> 00:32:45.205
of de default of your debt.
621
00:32:45.205 --> 00:32:47.005
It's quite good for your rating.
622
00:32:47.395 --> 00:32:49.365
It's a reduction in the leverage.
623
00:32:51.605 --> 00:32:54.545
How did the stock market react to the announcement
624
00:32:54.545 --> 00:32:55.945
of this convertible bond issue?
625
00:32:56.685 --> 00:32:58.425
It was very interesting.
626
00:32:58.655 --> 00:33:01.385
Immediately, stock price went down by 10%
627
00:33:01.895 --> 00:33:03.865
from 88 to 80.
628
00:33:04.645 --> 00:33:07.345
Oh, what is happening to the company, et cetera,
629
00:33:07.725 --> 00:33:11.865
and then Hower by Hower, it went up back
630
00:33:11.865 --> 00:33:15.065
to 88 and it went back to 90,
631
00:33:15.765 --> 00:33:20.545
so you understand how much market are volatile, nervous,
632
00:33:20.775 --> 00:33:23.145
anxious about any announcement, oh,
633
00:33:23.145 --> 00:33:25.865
they are issuing convertible bond, what is happening?
634
00:33:26.655 --> 00:33:30.795
Huge, huge volatility And
635
00:33:30.795 --> 00:33:34.275
what Satya Nadella, the very charismatic CEO of
636
00:33:34.915 --> 00:33:39.195
Microsoft said in February, 2025, is not going
637
00:33:39.195 --> 00:33:40.435
to reduce the anxiety
638
00:33:40.455 --> 00:33:42.235
and the volatility of the stock market.
639
00:33:42.885 --> 00:33:44.515
Discussing about data centers,
640
00:33:44.575 --> 00:33:48.115
he said there will be an overbuilt, there will be oversupply
641
00:33:48.175 --> 00:33:51.515
and then as a consequence the prices are going to calm down.
642
00:33:52.575 --> 00:33:55.275
You understand that this kind of statement is not going
643
00:33:55.275 --> 00:33:56.435
to make shareholders
644
00:33:56.735 --> 00:34:00.555
and investors in bonds feel very comfortable about the
645
00:34:00.555 --> 00:34:01.675
risk of their investment.
646
00:34:02.655 --> 00:34:04.675
It is increasing the volatility,
647
00:34:04.815 --> 00:34:06.715
it is increasing the anxiousness,
648
00:34:07.335 --> 00:34:11.315
but this is why also when you build a data center which is
649
00:34:11.315 --> 00:34:14.435
dedicated to AI and LLMs, you go for take
650
00:34:14.495 --> 00:34:15.635
or pay arrangements.
651
00:34:15.935 --> 00:34:17.915
If there is a take or pay arrangements, you know
652
00:34:17.915 --> 00:34:19.515
that your revenues are going
653
00:34:19.515 --> 00:34:21.995
to be a little bit quarantined for the next years.
654
00:34:22.415 --> 00:34:24.995
Though the business is extremely nervous
655
00:34:26.705 --> 00:34:28.965
As a conclusion, there is a considerable
656
00:34:29.315 --> 00:34:30.805
uncertainty in this business.
657
00:34:31.415 --> 00:34:32.965
Technology is fast moving.
658
00:34:33.265 --> 00:34:35.085
You remember that your GPU is going
659
00:34:35.085 --> 00:34:37.845
to be completely obsolete in three to four years time.
660
00:34:38.495 --> 00:34:41.005
There is an uncertainty about capacity,
661
00:34:41.005 --> 00:34:43.325
which I mentioned Satya and Adela.
662
00:34:43.335 --> 00:34:44.685
There will be over a capacity
663
00:34:44.685 --> 00:34:46.205
and you don't know at the end of the day,
664
00:34:46.635 --> 00:34:50.365
there's a huge uncertainty about electricity prices.
665
00:34:51.185 --> 00:34:54.005
Is it possible to build a model about electricity
666
00:34:54.005 --> 00:34:55.925
prices in medium term?
667
00:34:56.105 --> 00:35:00.765
That's extremely complex. What about demand for LLMs for ai?
668
00:35:01.155 --> 00:35:04.645
What about that? That is 80% of the project finance.
669
00:35:05.265 --> 00:35:08.445
Do you understand that? You pile up all these different
670
00:35:08.615 --> 00:35:10.245
risks and uncertainties
671
00:35:10.505 --> 00:35:13.925
and this is why the market is extremely reactive
672
00:35:13.925 --> 00:35:16.645
between quote, the market is extremely anxious
673
00:35:16.825 --> 00:35:19.005
and nervous about everything which is
674
00:35:19.005 --> 00:35:20.085
happening in this business.
675
00:35:20.975 --> 00:35:22.525
Thank you very much. I.
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast which will focus on a very prominent field right now.
Data centers, more specifically those dedicated to training AI generated LLMs.
The companies that best symbolizes this business and is currently the center of attention is core wave.
The story starts in 2017.
Three traders and a computer scientist.
Experts are going to create a company around mining for cryptocurrencies, especially Ethereum.
But in 2018, a year later, there will be a big crash in the cryptocurrencies business.
Bitcoin value is going to go down by 80%.
Then you have to experience a strategic shift, and in 2019 they are going to repurpose the capacity in cloud infrastructures.
IT change the name, it becomes core wave and it's about computing, not just data storage, it's about high performance computing for ai.
Now, even though there are some similarities between HPC and hyperscale, there are quite significant differences.
Hyperscalers are very well known.
Cloud suppliers, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Azure, and Google.
HPC is very much about processing, not simply data storage processing for training AI model.
So it's a kind of capacity as a service model, you run your capacity to these guys who need the capacity and the computing in order to train the models.
It's about dedicated data centers.
Very big difference in terms of capacity, energy consumption, safety needs.
Now they can be independent or owned in core wave owned by Amazon, Microsoft, et cetera, the big hyper skaters In order to understand what it means.
HPC, let's have a look at the project matrix of a traditional data center cluster AI unit processes from Nvidia H 100, for example, 14,000 GPUs, but you need plenty of energy, electricity capacity, 18 megawatts.
What does it mean in terms of capacity? If you take a city electrical capacity with 18 megawatts, it's okay for 10,000 to 15,000 inhabitants, but the city does not use a full capacity full time.
As far as HPC is concerned, the conception is much higher because it's 24 7, full speed, full capacity capital expenditure is about a billion from 900 million to 1.2 billion in the figure, you have 400 million for the GPUs for example, and 250 million for the 18 megawatt capacity.
The problem is a rapid obsolescence in terms of technology.
In three to four years your processes are outdated, which means that there is a very high operating risks, plenty of CapEx and short life.
Then the only way to run the business is take over pace.
There will be a client which makes a commitment of using say 80% of the theoretical capacity during 3, 4, 5 years.
Then you take a dedicated SPV to welcome the data center.
You have a customer and as you have some visibility, you can put plenty of debt with a return capital and the leverage the shareholder internal rate of return might reach about 20%, which is okay, but the risk is very high.
Let's deep dive a little bit in the financial metrics.
Our repeat capital expenditures, 900 million to 1.2 billion revenues only quote $300 million, so it's about 30% of the CapEx.
The assets turnover is very low, which is a consequence of a very high capital intensity.
Then if the assets turnover is very low and you want to generate a decent return on capital, you need to generate a high return on sales.
Operating expenses account for about 80 million.
Out of 300 million of revenues though they bid die 220 million, which is quite okay, but during three years and maybe you are going to keep on running the business, you're four, five to six, but you understand that for example, four years of 220 million is just a CapEx.
So you break even on a cash point of view in four years and you make your bread and butter your INPV in year five to six.
It's extremely risky.
The bank is are providing 800 million, 80% of the financing, but why? Because of the take or pay, then you create a special purpose vehicle and financing belongs to a very specific field, which is project finance, not very traditional corporate finance.
Where does core wave stands today? The technical status is provided by some information, the IPO, which took place in March, 2025, and we have the update October with Q3 2025.
It seems that the company at that time owns 41 data centers.
There are 100% dedicated to AI training.
LLMs more than 250,000 GPUs coming from nvidia.
The traditional history called H 100 and the new Blackwell.
So there is a very high supplier dependency because they buy the GPUs from Nvidia, 100% of them, but there is a kind of privilege and highly communicated relationship with Nvidia, so there's also a client's dependency.
Not many companies are going to buy a service, OpenAI obviously Microsoft, but there are some other dependencies, a dependence on debt floating or fixed rate, and there is a dependence on energy costs which are quite difficult to forecast those days.
Now this we have the financial metrics of a project.
Let's have a look at the financial metrics of the company core wave as it is.
First, let's have a look at the revenues.
The growth is absolutely unbelievable.
Revenues are growing by $200 million each and every quarter.
A few quarters ago the revenues were 200 million to their eighties, 1.4 billion per quarter and it is absolutely mechanical increase, which is unbelievable.
Again, what about the future as far as growth is concerned, the company is communicating on its backlog.
The backlog Q3 24 was 15 billion.
The backlog Q3 25 is more than 55 billion out of which 40% for the next 24 months for the next two years, if you take 40% of 55 billion, you divide by eight quarters in two years it's about $2.8 billion per quarter, so it is twice as much as a current ebit.
So you understand that the perspectives in terms of revenue growth are absolutely huge.
You could expect that the company is going to generate significant economies of scale with such a high growth rate and it's not the case.
If you look at the operating expenses, the main one, the big figure is technology.
It's about 50%, it was 50% and it's still 50% cost of sales.
There were some economies of scale a few quarters ago, but now it's quite stable general and that mean quite stable.
Sales and marketing absolutely negligible and growing a little bit as a percentage to revenues, so you generate economies of scale when fixed costs are fixed, but it seems that costs are quite variable.
When you observe operating expenses which are quite stable percentage of revenues, you would anticipate that the EBIT itself, which is revenues minus of x, is a quite stable percentage to revenues and it's not the case.
It was about 15% up to three quarters ago and then it dramatically and abruptly went down positive to negative, a little bit negative and then it's a little bit up but not 15 C, about three, 4%.
Now, how do you explain that? As a matter of fact, the operating expenses, which I showed you are excluding stock based compensation and what happened is that stock based compensation dramatically increased during the first quarter for a very simple reason.
The IPO, You should look at the evolution of stock-based compensation.
The last quarters, it was absolutely negligible up to end of 2024, a few millions per quarter, less than 5% a few quarters ago are now down to 2%, and then because of the IPO, the cap distributed penny off restricted stock units, stock options and so on and so forth, and it amounted to 180 million just during the first quarter, which is about 18% of the revenues of the company at that time.
Then it went down, but you understand that it explains the difference between the opex without stock-based compensation and the published opex difference between the adjusted EBIT and the actual published ebit adjusted unpublished EBIT were quite the same up to end of 2024, and then the adjusted EBIT stabilized to the level of 15%, which is a consequence of the figures, which I gave you a few minutes ago, and then the act four published EBIT went down dramatically.
As I said, the difference is simply the stock based compensation.
Now let's keep these adjusted figures adjusted from stock based compensation.
The difference between adjusted EBIT and adjusted EBITDA is of course depreciation and monetization.
The company is investing a lot in capital expenditures, but the COMPANIE is also investing a lot in research and development capitalized r and d expenses, one is depreciated, the other one is amortized.
The EBITDA adjusted is about 60% of revenues and the EBIT adjusted is about 15.
The difference is investment.
These companies extremely capital intensive, But then the question is capital intensity, yes, as a percentage to revenues, how do you compare CapEx and revenues? If you look at the recent quarters, you understand that capital expenditure is about two years of revenues, which is absolutely dramatic, but you generate a high bid DA easy A bid, DA high enough in order to finance the capital expenditures and the answer is absolutely no.
Even though the EBIT D is very much up in absolute terms as a consequence of growth in revenues, the E-P-D-H-S finances one third 35% of the capital expenditures, so you understand that growth is consuming financial resources, internal financial resources, about 35 of the CapEx.
Now you need to find 65 somewhere else before we explore the way the company's financing is gross and capital expenditures.
It's interesting to make a very quick stop at Q3 communication, Q2 communication full.
Your guidance for 2025 is five to five point 35 billion of revenues.
Revenues are a little bit lower in the guidance which is provided in Q3 25.
Of course, when revenues are down as costs are variable, well basically the adjusted operating income is going to be a little bit down.
Interest expense is quite significant because there is a lot of debt and interest expense and interest rates are not negligible.
But what is very interesting is to observe the guidance in terms of capital expenditures.
The company was announcing during the first quarter of 2025 that CapEx would be 20 to 23 billion and the guidance is reduced to 12 to 14 billion just a quarter later.
That's quite a surprise in terms of capacity investment.
You remember that when you want to find on the non-car assets of a company, you can mobilize data and equity, but before that you can also mobilize your own operating cycle, which is a working capital requirement.
Of course, when it is negative, when you look at the working capital requirement of core wave, it's operating current assets minus operating current liabilities and it's negative by 2.1 billion.
The current liabilities operating are exceeding the current assets operating by 2.1 billion, so it's a resource which comes from the operating cycle, but that's not the end of the story because as the clients are paying in advance short term and long term, there's a deferred revenue which is more than $5 billion in the balance sheet of the company.
So the operating resources are coming from the operating cycle are the combination of a negative working capital requirement without the deferred revenue 2.1 billion and the deferred revenue 5.4, so it's a total of 7.5 billion, which is extremely significant.
It's not enough, but it's quite a lot of money.
Of course, 7.5 billion is a very high figure, but it's far from being enough to finance the growth and the capital expenditures of the company.
What comes from capital markets is 22.3 billion out of which most of it is debt, 19.5, Q3, 2025, and only in 2025 the company raised almost $9 billion of debt, so it's a very important actor on the bond market.
The rest is about equity, but equity is 2.8.
It's not exactly 2.8 issues.
Equity shares issues about 1.5 billion and the rest is about secondary offerings, but secondary offerings is not cash for the cab.
It sells from shareholders to shareholders, and so the shareholders are cashing in 1.3 billion.
Those who sell their shares but not the cab itself.
So cash for the company is 1.5 billion two series are absolutely significant.
Series B, a first tranche of 200 and a second of 200 and series C, which is very big with 1.1 billion.
A very important investor is both in debt and equity.
Manar and Manar holds more than 20% of the shares when the company is listed in March, 2025.
Manar is a very well known actor operating in the industry of structured finance there were quite involved in the subprime business.
They're also involved in arbitrary strategies and they started investing in venture capital in 2024.
When you're involved in the subprime business, do you survive to the subprime crisis? The answer is yes.
They were very much a structuring, CDOs, investments, et cetera, but they are quite ous people and they understood that there was something which was going to happen.
This is why they hedge very much their position with credit, their fois, the CDS, and then they survived.
Now they participated to series B and C and sometimes as the leader for call wave and they participated to the issue of the convertible bond issued by coal wave.
Now the company has more than 20% of these shares.
The value of their equity holding is $8 billion with a current stock price of coal wave, which is a very significant multiple.
When you are extremely active on a debt and bond market, the question is which risk premium are you going to pay as a consequence of the property of default of your debt? What is your rating? There are two approaches.
First, your ability with your cash flows to repair your debt.
Cash flow is about ebitda, cash upbringing, profit, and so if you divide net debt by a bid, you get the financial leverage.
How many years does it take in order to repair the debt? The second one is well, debt is financing your business operations, business operations, capital employed, capital employed as a value which is named enterprise value.
Is the enterprise value high enough, significantly greater than your indebtedness? If it is the case, then with your enterprise value you can repair the debt.
That's a financial structure that the gearing debt divided by equity.
Let's start with the financial leverage.
Financial leverage is net divided by EBDA, the cash operating profit.
Now the question is debt.
Of course it's the one we chose in your balance sheet, but what about EBDA? Do you take the current one? Do you take the historical one? Do you take the future one? The future will be certainly much more than the current one, but if you take the past, you take the last 12 months for example, you get six years of a bid DA, but it's not a very relevant figure because you remember the current revenue is about 1.4 billion.
The average revenue for the next quarters for the next two years going to be 2.8 twice as much.
Now, if you take the current bid DA, which is a bit more relevant than the last four quarters, you get five years, but basically even though the figure is a bit higher today than what it was a few quarters ago, it's not very high because the growth is there.
Second perspective, the financial structure, the gearing debt divided by equity, the gearing dramatically went down when the company issued shares one public, the initial public offering.
I'm going to explain you that in a few minutes though.
You repair your debt with the equity which is raised and the gearing naturally goes down, it goes down to two, and then it is up a few quarters later to four that the gearing is up exactly the same as the financial leverage is up, but the gearing is that divided by equity.
Which equity do you take? Do you take the one which is in the books or do you take the value of equity? And then what is very interesting is to understand that the value of equity is much more than the book value.
The price to book is 18, which means that $1 of book equity is evaluated $18 by the market.
Then if you take the market gearing, which is debt non divided by book equity, but by market value of equity market capitalization, you understand that the debt structure, the gearing is a fraction.
It's significantly less than one.
What does it mean? It means that the financial structure is extremely conservative if you trust values.
Now, what is in the mind of investors and rating agencies? Do they consider that because of the value of the company, the enterprise value, the debt structure is extremely conservative, or do they consider that even though there are some good prospects in the revenues, the financial leverage is high? Definitely the approach which is privileged by the market is leverage more than gearing in a decision making process.
S and p is providing a rating which is B plus Moodys and FI equivalent BBB minus, so it's speculative grade, it's high yield debt, and that's quite interesting because you could interpret that with the fact that the market valuation is extremely volatile, absolutely not guaranteed.
The one thing which counts if you want to repair your debt is cash and stock price is not cash.
It's a valuation, it's a transaction which happened a few minutes ago.
It is absolutely not cash to repair the debt.
EBDA is cash.
Now the consequence of a probability of default, which is perceived as quite high by the rating agencies on the capital market, the cost of that is going to be high.
If you look at the last issues of the company communicated in the regulated information, the interest rate is nine to 10%, which is significantly higher than the governed bond rate.
There is a very high risk premium, very high probability of default in the valuation of the bonds.
You understand that the cost of that is quite high, which is consistent with the rating of the company.
But what is very interesting is to observe the evolution of the perception of the bond market of the investors in the bonds in terms of risk, and then there is a very nice way to observe that, which is a credit de swap market.
The cost of the CDS is what you are ready to pay in order to make sure that your investment in the bond is quite safe.
You remember what happened with the CDS market when the subprime crisis uh exploded and it's interesting to observe what happened to a rle and coal wave the last three months starting in September for a rockle, the five year born and 10 year born.
This credit Defo swap was half a percent a little bit more and it doubled to one and 1.5% and you observe what happened to the stock price of Oracle, which is very much involved in data centers with a lot of that in the balance sheet for coal wave, it's even more dramatic.
The credit falls to up rate in September was 4%, 4.5% depending on the maturity, and today it's 6.5, 7.5%.
So what is perceived by the market is that it's extremely risky business and with a huge impact on your ability to repetitive debt on the property of default.
I mentioned that the company went public during the first quarter of 2025.
It happened in March, 2025 and the price which was proposed to the market is $40 per share.
The company issued 37.6 million shares, which is an increase by 9% of the number of shares outstanding, one multiplied by the other.
It gives you uh, the amount of money which is raised by the company from the market, 1.5 billion, but they reduced very much ambition.
The initial ambitions were about 4 billion and they were not sure that the market would accept such a high amount.
Then they redo their ambitions to 1.5 and it was a success, but a success in terms of liquidity, not very much in terms of stock price.
The closing price, the first day of listing is $40, which means that the company accepted the price but not more.
What's very interesting is to understand that in the ordinary shares they are ahas and B shares.
There are 300 million of ahas each and every share hold one voting right, 118 million B shares each and every B share has 10 voting rights and there are reserves as a founders, which is very traditional in the so-called new economy.
The shares which were offered are a shares.
So of course the founders were diluted in terms of net asset value, but they were not diluted at all in terms of voting rights and they keep the control is 80% of the shares Shortly after its listing.
Coal Wave started discussions with core scientific to buy core scientific core scientific company, which was created the same year as Coal Wave in 2017 was the same business model mining for cryptos.
The company experienced very big problems and put itself under the protection of chapter 11 in 2022, crypto and energy cost and the company was ED to NASDAQ in 2024.
Same s pivot HPC for ai, but the very key advantage for cost scientific and extremely reliable and efficient access to energy.
If you look at the existing capacity plus projects under development, it's most at two gigawatt and you remember it's absolutely emal for this business, which is consuming GPUs from Nvidia but also a lot of electricity, Coal wave and core scientific.
They know each other quite well because coal wave is leasing capacity to core scientific.
In fact, the one is in tenant, the other one is a landlord.
When you sign a long term contract with a kind of uh, lease commitment, you also have to show it on the balance sheet.
This is IFRS 16.
You discount the lease payments which are committed and then it's an amount which is absolutely not negligible.
It's $3 billion in the IPO prospectus end of Q3, the 10 Q, nearly $5 billion and then Core Wave and discloses that they're going to internalize $12 billion in lease payments plus and wall synergies between the two companies, 500 million per year, et cetera.
But you understand that the rationality for core wave is this kind of lease flexibility, especially if there is uncertainty in the demand.
You analyze the lease payments and then you don't have to show huge losses.
Press access to energy, press size and then bargaining power.
You understand the rationality for Coal wave.
Unfortunately for Coal Wave, this uh, deal which was quite favorable for them did not go to the end.
The companies listed in March, 2025, the stock price is skyrocketing and in July, 2025 they make an offer.
They evaluate Core Scientific at $9 billion and it's an all stock transaction, so they're going to pay with their own shares.
The stock price which is offered for Car Scientific paid with Core Wave stocks is $20.40 per share, which was a premium of 66% against the last days of stock prices.
The price of Core Wave at that time is speaking at 165, so you understand that they are going to offer 0.1235 call wave shares for one core scientific shares end of October.
Core wave stock price is down from 1 65 to 1 33 and then the evaluation of Core Scientific is no more.
9 billion is 7.3 billion, but there are some estimates considering that Core Scientific is worth 11 billion and certainly not seven points, 3 billion.
When Core Scientific withdraws from the deal at the end of October, core wave is at $82 per share.
So it's quite rational for Core Scientific to say either you change a conversion price, you change the rate at which you are going to buy our shares or we withdraw and they withdrew.
Now it's quite interesting to put all the pieces together and observe what happens with stock price of coal wave.
Since the listing, the company is listed at $40 per share, not many changes from March to May, and then the stock price skyrocketing get to a peak in June, July and at that time they start a discussion with Core Scientific and they make the offer then the stock price goes down, get to a low point, which is September, 1890, and then interestingly you remember that the CDS, the cost of the CDS is up starting in September.
In the meantime, the stock price is back to a very high level showing a return of 250% as opposed to the stock price when the company is listed.
So you have the probability of de default of the debt, which is up in the meantime the stock price which is up, which means that the company is investors, the financial analysts, they don't trust the stock price when it is about assessing the probability of deferred of the dead.
Then after this second peak, it's down and it's down because of a core scientific deal which does not work and then it's further down because of the announcement in Q3, you reduce the revenues and the guidance, you reduce the operating income and you reduce the capital expenditures and today it's plus 100 something percent as opposed to stock price.
When the company is issued Each's 80 something against 40.
In the meantime, the NASDAQ is up by 36%, so it's not bad deal for the investors, but you understand that there was quite a lot of volatility, especially this last month Quite recently and the age of December, 2025.
The company announces another debt issue, but it's not a straight traditional classical debt.
It's a hybrid convertible bonds, so it's a debt to debt which can be converted into equity.
The stock price is high enough at maturity.
The initial amount which is offers $2 billion.
It will be an overall allocation, a green shoe, $2.25 billion.
At the em.
The maturity is September, 2031 and the coupon is 1.75 cm.
You remember that for the straight debt it was nine to 10%.
Now one of the main advantages of issuing convertible bond is you redo the cost of debt.
The other advantages are you are going to postpone the dilution and you're going to reduce the dilution and this is a reason is because the company is issuing the bond at a nominal value, which is more than a stock price and the actual conversion will take place at maturity and now today the nominal of the bond is $1,000.
The conversion rate, which is a final adjustment when you issue the bond is 9.2764.
The breakeven is $107.80, which is exactly 1000 divided by the conversion rate and if you compare 1 0 7 0.8 with a current stock price of $88 when the company issuing the debt, it's a premium of only 23%, only 23% and the maturity of six euro.
So you understand that it's absolutely not aggressive and it's going to be quite a great success.
It's interesting to observe how on an accounting point of view the financial analysts are treating the convertible bond in the balance sheet.
Well, first, the option of the convertible bond is out of the Monet because the stock price is less than the break even of 107.8, which we calculated, so it's treated as debt, straight debt, but if the stock price goes up, then the probability that the bond is converted to shares higher and the option is in the money, then the financial analysts are going to put part of the debt in equity and the rest of it remains as debt.
Then if you reduce debt, you reduce the financial leverage, you reduce the gearing and then this is quite good for the probability of de default of your debt.
It's quite good for your rating.
It's a reduction in the leverage.
How did the stock market react to the announcement of this convertible bond issue? It was very interesting.
Immediately, stock price went down by 10% from 88 to 80.
Oh, what is happening to the company, et cetera, and then Hower by Hower, it went up back to 88 and it went back to 90, so you understand how much market are volatile, nervous, anxious about any announcement, oh, they are issuing convertible bond, what is happening? Huge, huge volatility And what Satya Nadella, the very charismatic CEO of Microsoft said in February, 2025, is not going to reduce the anxiety and the volatility of the stock market.
Discussing about data centers, he said there will be an overbuilt, there will be oversupply and then as a consequence the prices are going to calm down.
You understand that this kind of statement is not going to make shareholders and investors in bonds feel very comfortable about the risk of their investment.
It is increasing the volatility, it is increasing the anxiousness, but this is why also when you build a data center which is dedicated to AI and LLMs, you go for take or pay arrangements.
If there is a take or pay arrangements, you know that your revenues are going to be a little bit quarantined for the next years.
Though the business is extremely nervous As a conclusion, there is a considerable uncertainty in this business.
Technology is fast moving.
You remember that your GPU is going to be completely obsolete in three to four years time.
There is an uncertainty about capacity, which I mentioned Satya and Adela.
There will be over a capacity and you don't know at the end of the day, there's a huge uncertainty about electricity prices.
Is it possible to build a model about electricity prices in medium term? That's extremely complex.
What about demand for LLMs for ai? What about that? That is 80% of the project finance.
Do you understand that? You pile up all these different risks and uncertainties and this is why the market is extremely reactive between quote, the market is extremely anxious and nervous about everything which is happening in this business.
Thank you very much.
I.