June 2025 Vidcast // Circle IPO
Circle – Successful IPO in the cryptocurrency
On June 6, 2025, a company in the cryptocurrency sector, Circle, made a triumphant entry on the Nasdaq, closing its first day of trading at a price equal to 3.5 times its IPO price… Risky speculation, loss of opportunity or logical conclusion to a successful journey in the stablecoin world? The vidcast shows the operational stakes of a "token" whose value must follow the dollar by guaranteeing its convertibility into fiat currency. As is often the case, building trust capital is critical to the success of such a project, accompanied by a minimum of opportunism…
WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.785 --> 00:00:03.495
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast, which is diverted
2
00:00:03.495 --> 00:00:06.975
to a company operating in a cryptocurrency industry
3
00:00:07.435 --> 00:00:10.855
and which realized very recently an extremely successful
4
00:00:11.215 --> 00:00:12.415
IPO circle.
5
00:00:14.535 --> 00:00:18.975
A few weeks ago on the 27th of May, 2025, the company
6
00:00:19.575 --> 00:00:22.015
communicated a rage for the issue prize,
7
00:00:22.225 --> 00:00:24.895
which was supposedly happening a few days later.
8
00:00:25.435 --> 00:00:29.135
The range was 25 to 26 US dollars
9
00:00:30.095 --> 00:00:32.015
a week later, the 4th of June,
10
00:00:32.435 --> 00:00:35.935
the final issue prize is announced $31,
11
00:00:35.935 --> 00:00:40.615
which is about 20% more than the upper part of the range.
12
00:00:41.315 --> 00:00:44.375
At the end of the day, two days later, the 6th of June,
13
00:00:44.675 --> 00:00:48.255
the opening price is not going to be 31, it's going
14
00:00:48.255 --> 00:00:49.335
to be 96.
15
00:00:50.035 --> 00:00:54.815
The highest is going to be achieved during this day at 124,
16
00:00:54.905 --> 00:00:58.095
which is exactly four times the issue price.
17
00:00:58.565 --> 00:01:00.335
Then there will be a small decline
18
00:01:00.635 --> 00:01:04.055
and the stock price will close at 107.7,
19
00:01:04.505 --> 00:01:09.055
which is plus 247% against the
20
00:01:09.185 --> 00:01:11.175
issue price of $31.
21
00:01:13.175 --> 00:01:16.065
When the closing price at the end of the first day
22
00:01:16.065 --> 00:01:18.865
of listing represents more than three times as much
23
00:01:18.885 --> 00:01:21.745
as the issue price, you can directly conclude
24
00:01:21.745 --> 00:01:25.385
that it was a very significant underpricing in the process.
25
00:01:26.365 --> 00:01:30.545
For June 6th Circle high PO leaves more than
26
00:01:30.725 --> 00:01:33.425
$1.7 billion on the table.
27
00:01:34.135 --> 00:01:38.025
Seven's biggest underpricing indicates in fact,
28
00:01:38.025 --> 00:01:40.945
when you calculate 34 million shares offered to the market
29
00:01:41.525 --> 00:01:44.265
and you multiply that by the difference 96,
30
00:01:44.555 --> 00:01:45.825
which is the opening price
31
00:01:45.965 --> 00:01:49.585
and 31 which is the issue price, you even get $2.2 billion
32
00:01:50.575 --> 00:01:54.185
seven's biggest underpricing in the list rivian
33
00:01:54.725 --> 00:01:58.505
for the car industry, 2.6 billion snowflake, top
34
00:01:58.505 --> 00:02:01.705
of the list number one, $3.7 billion.
35
00:02:02.445 --> 00:02:04.825
But if you remember the film which was produced
36
00:02:04.845 --> 00:02:07.945
by the academy about the IPO of Snowflake,
37
00:02:08.365 --> 00:02:13.025
the opening market cap is 50 years of revenues.
38
00:02:13.365 --> 00:02:16.345
The closing market cap at the end of the first day
39
00:02:16.345 --> 00:02:19.825
of listing is 100 years of revenues,
40
00:02:20.115 --> 00:02:21.905
which is extremely high.
41
00:02:22.405 --> 00:02:25.225
Of course, later on there would be some disappointment.
42
00:02:27.845 --> 00:02:29.185
Of course there was a mistake,
43
00:02:29.285 --> 00:02:32.865
but it's always much easier to predict the path than
44
00:02:33.085 --> 00:02:34.345
to anticipate the future
45
00:02:35.205 --> 00:02:38.105
and it's quite easy to understand as well
46
00:02:38.695 --> 00:02:41.945
that making the financial analysis a financial valuation
47
00:02:41.945 --> 00:02:45.705
of a company operating in a cryptocurrency business
48
00:02:45.885 --> 00:02:49.105
and trying to anticipate the reactions
49
00:02:49.105 --> 00:02:51.985
of the investors is extremely difficult,
50
00:02:52.355 --> 00:02:55.865
especially those days when the cryptocurrency industry is
51
00:02:56.905 --> 00:02:59.225
volatile and quite unpredictable.
52
00:03:01.615 --> 00:03:03.925
There were two objectives in this IPO.
53
00:03:04.345 --> 00:03:07.005
The first one, traditional is about financing growth,
54
00:03:07.625 --> 00:03:09.805
but the second one is providing an exit
55
00:03:09.825 --> 00:03:11.725
to some historical called investors,
56
00:03:12.055 --> 00:03:14.605
which were absolutely significant in the financing
57
00:03:14.605 --> 00:03:15.965
and development of the company.
58
00:03:16.825 --> 00:03:19.685
So 34 million shares were offered to the market.
59
00:03:20.685 --> 00:03:23.285
14.8 million were issued
60
00:03:23.585 --> 00:03:27.245
and sold against cash at $31 per share.
61
00:03:27.385 --> 00:03:30.845
It represents $460 million cash in
62
00:03:30.845 --> 00:03:31.965
the bank account of the company.
63
00:03:33.325 --> 00:03:38.045
19.2 million shares were sold from investors,
64
00:03:38.455 --> 00:03:40.405
which had been so significant in the
65
00:03:40.405 --> 00:03:41.445
development of the company.
66
00:03:41.825 --> 00:03:44.485
So you provide an exit, a partial exit to
67
00:03:44.705 --> 00:03:46.565
for example Goldman Sachs.
68
00:03:48.945 --> 00:03:51.425
A few dates are quite important in the history circle.
69
00:03:51.575 --> 00:03:55.945
Further creation in 2013 by Jeremy Allaire and Sean Neville.
70
00:03:56.725 --> 00:04:00.665
In 2015, they obtained a bid license for the company name
71
00:04:01.125 --> 00:04:03.065
and what's interesting is that they decide
72
00:04:03.065 --> 00:04:05.665
to operate from the New York state, which is very well known
73
00:04:06.005 --> 00:04:09.305
for a strict regulation for cryptocurrencies.
74
00:04:09.925 --> 00:04:14.785
Strict regulation means resilience, transparency, quality
75
00:04:15.085 --> 00:04:16.905
and robustness of execution.
76
00:04:17.245 --> 00:04:18.825
At the end of the day, trust
77
00:04:19.005 --> 00:04:21.345
for the stakeholders very important point.
78
00:04:22.165 --> 00:04:26.745
In 2016, they start and stop circle pay and application.
79
00:04:26.975 --> 00:04:28.505
They launch under withdraw,
80
00:04:28.685 --> 00:04:32.145
but the turning point is 2018 when the consortium is
81
00:04:32.385 --> 00:04:36.145
launching a stable coin, which is based backed
82
00:04:36.145 --> 00:04:37.185
by the US dollar.
83
00:04:37.725 --> 00:04:39.345
The name of the consortium is center.
84
00:04:39.685 --> 00:04:42.905
The two main actors are circle and coin base
85
00:04:42.965 --> 00:04:46.065
and the name of the stablecoin is USDC.
86
00:04:46.565 --> 00:04:49.505
Now going to share the governance up to 2023.
87
00:04:50.125 --> 00:04:51.705
Now circle either one
88
00:04:51.765 --> 00:04:55.185
and unique company in charge of full governance
89
00:04:55.245 --> 00:04:56.305
of the stable coin.
90
00:04:58.765 --> 00:05:02.335
What is a stable coin? First, it's a cryptocurrency.
91
00:05:02.845 --> 00:05:05.535
It's a digital currency which is mobilizing
92
00:05:05.535 --> 00:05:07.655
and using the blockchain technology.
93
00:05:08.835 --> 00:05:11.015
The Bitcoin is also a cryptocurrency,
94
00:05:11.155 --> 00:05:14.455
but the value of the Bitcoin depends on the evolution
95
00:05:14.455 --> 00:05:15.615
of supply and demand.
96
00:05:16.365 --> 00:05:18.175
It's not the case for a stable coin.
97
00:05:18.235 --> 00:05:20.895
It drags the evolution of a reference currency.
98
00:05:21.365 --> 00:05:24.015
It's pegged to the evolution of the reference currency.
99
00:05:24.635 --> 00:05:27.335
In this case it's a US dollar, but it might be the Euro
100
00:05:27.675 --> 00:05:29.935
or any robust robust currency.
101
00:05:30.555 --> 00:05:35.215
The objective is to facilitate secure transactions secure
102
00:05:35.215 --> 00:05:37.615
because of blockchain and facilitate
103
00:05:37.615 --> 00:05:41.255
because you can exchange US dollars without holding them.
104
00:05:41.755 --> 00:05:45.455
You hold something which looks like something which follows,
105
00:05:45.455 --> 00:05:47.295
which tracks the US dollars.
106
00:05:47.955 --> 00:05:49.775
As far as the US dollar is concerned,
107
00:05:49.775 --> 00:05:52.975
there are two main players for stable coins.
108
00:05:53.515 --> 00:05:54.855
Tether is the largest one.
109
00:05:55.355 --> 00:05:57.485
The name of the stable coin is USDT
110
00:05:57.825 --> 00:06:00.365
and the capitalization is $110 billion.
111
00:06:00.785 --> 00:06:02.965
Circle is number two with USDC
112
00:06:03.305 --> 00:06:06.605
and with $60 billion of capitalization,
113
00:06:07.145 --> 00:06:10.685
but the reputation of circle is to be much more transparent
114
00:06:11.145 --> 00:06:13.485
and regulated than its competitor.
115
00:06:16.315 --> 00:06:19.195
Probably the main challenge which is met by
116
00:06:19.715 --> 00:06:21.555
companies operating in a stable con business
117
00:06:22.295 --> 00:06:25.555
is a combination of convertibility and liquidity.
118
00:06:26.395 --> 00:06:30.475
A token A-U-S-D-C is worth by construction $1.
119
00:06:31.015 --> 00:06:34.035
So if for example, you want to buy a token which is created
120
00:06:34.375 --> 00:06:36.555
by circle, you are going
121
00:06:36.555 --> 00:06:40.395
to buy one token created against cash
122
00:06:40.575 --> 00:06:41.675
of $1,
123
00:06:42.535 --> 00:06:46.435
but you may be also motivated of doing the other way around.
124
00:06:46.775 --> 00:06:49.355
So you want to convert the token which you hold into cash
125
00:06:49.775 --> 00:06:51.795
and then you are going to ask maybe to circle
126
00:06:52.455 --> 00:06:53.835
to do the conversion.
127
00:06:53.965 --> 00:06:55.315
There will be a bank transfer
128
00:06:55.335 --> 00:06:58.275
and you are going to get your money back maybe minus some
129
00:06:58.305 --> 00:07:00.835
fees, but in order to do so,
130
00:07:01.135 --> 00:07:04.835
the USD must be available in the bank account of C
131
00:07:05.615 --> 00:07:08.435
and then you can enter the liquidity of the tokens,
132
00:07:08.695 --> 00:07:12.035
the liquidity of the USDC as a stable coin.
133
00:07:12.785 --> 00:07:15.435
Then you understand that the cash which is held
134
00:07:15.575 --> 00:07:16.675
by circle has
135
00:07:16.675 --> 00:07:20.195
to be invested in assets which are risk-free and liquid.
136
00:07:20.785 --> 00:07:24.115
Sometimes there are some unpleasant surprises.
137
00:07:24.695 --> 00:07:27.635
You remember the bank, Silicon Valley Bank, very well known
138
00:07:27.635 --> 00:07:30.915
for investing its cash in risk-free assets such
139
00:07:30.915 --> 00:07:33.715
as long-term US government bonds and so on
140
00:07:33.715 --> 00:07:36.915
and so forth Because of evolution of interest rate
141
00:07:37.015 --> 00:07:40.195
and mark to market accounting SVB went bankrupt,
142
00:07:40.815 --> 00:07:44.195
but there were $3.3 billion of circle cash
143
00:07:45.355 --> 00:07:46.995
invested in SVB
144
00:07:47.855 --> 00:07:52.035
and so during a short period of time, the company circle had
145
00:07:52.035 --> 00:07:54.795
to interrupt the conversion up
146
00:07:54.795 --> 00:07:57.435
to the moment when a financial institution
147
00:07:57.915 --> 00:08:01.835
provided a warranty on the assets of SVB.
148
00:08:02.065 --> 00:08:03.635
That was quite unpleasant
149
00:08:03.855 --> 00:08:06.195
and a risky moment for the stakeholders
150
00:08:09.035 --> 00:08:10.415
in order to meet the challenge
151
00:08:10.435 --> 00:08:13.095
and the requirements of convertibility and liquidity.
152
00:08:13.105 --> 00:08:14.535
There are different backing methods.
153
00:08:15.435 --> 00:08:18.495
The one which is quite resilient and robust
154
00:08:18.675 --> 00:08:21.455
and the one which I described is about fiat money.
155
00:08:21.835 --> 00:08:24.015
So you hold as much fiat currency
156
00:08:24.435 --> 00:08:27.775
as tokens you have issued created
157
00:08:28.355 --> 00:08:30.655
10 billion tokens at $1 each.
158
00:08:30.955 --> 00:08:33.695
You hold $10 billion in your bank account.
159
00:08:34.555 --> 00:08:36.455
Its name Fiat collateralized.
160
00:08:37.245 --> 00:08:39.935
Another way to do the same thing is
161
00:08:39.935 --> 00:08:41.935
to hold another cryptocurrency,
162
00:08:41.935 --> 00:08:44.815
which its itself is fiat collateralized
163
00:08:45.355 --> 00:08:49.055
and then this other cryptocurrency serves as a kind
164
00:08:49.055 --> 00:08:50.615
of intermediary collateral.
165
00:08:50.995 --> 00:08:53.135
Its name crypto collateralized.
166
00:08:54.205 --> 00:08:56.005
Some stable coins are not
167
00:08:56.005 --> 00:08:58.645
that stable I would say they are backed
168
00:08:58.665 --> 00:09:00.725
by algorithmic backing
169
00:09:01.305 --> 00:09:03.005
and it corresponds to a kind
170
00:09:03.005 --> 00:09:05.165
of adjustment supply demand adjustment,
171
00:09:05.165 --> 00:09:06.765
which is extremely risky.
172
00:09:07.025 --> 00:09:11.585
We have terrible examples about that as far
173
00:09:11.605 --> 00:09:15.105
as US backed stable coins are concerned,
174
00:09:15.645 --> 00:09:18.905
the big accident is May, 2022.
175
00:09:19.605 --> 00:09:23.185
The name of stable coin is UST and it's backed by terror.
176
00:09:23.775 --> 00:09:26.185
It's about algorithmic stable coin.
177
00:09:26.735 --> 00:09:28.945
Then there was an arbitrage mechanism
178
00:09:29.015 --> 00:09:32.265
with another cryptocurrency, which is named Luna.
179
00:09:33.245 --> 00:09:35.505
Not getting into the detail what happened,
180
00:09:35.565 --> 00:09:36.745
but there was a panic.
181
00:09:37.115 --> 00:09:41.145
There was a UST sell off massive Luna dilution
182
00:09:41.445 --> 00:09:45.705
and value destruction evaporated $45 billion
183
00:09:46.465 --> 00:09:48.385
consequences, loss of trust,
184
00:09:48.395 --> 00:09:53.185
especially in non collateralized algorithmic stable coins.
185
00:09:55.825 --> 00:09:58.085
The value distraction, the evaporation
186
00:09:58.085 --> 00:10:02.285
of $45 billion is not the only negative consequence
187
00:10:02.285 --> 00:10:04.765
of the accident of terra UST.
188
00:10:05.295 --> 00:10:07.125
There is another collateral damage,
189
00:10:07.125 --> 00:10:12.085
which is the unsuccessful IPO of circle via a spac,
190
00:10:12.285 --> 00:10:14.525
a special purpose acquisition company.
191
00:10:15.105 --> 00:10:19.725
The company wanted to go public merger IPO agreement
192
00:10:19.835 --> 00:10:24.725
with Concord in 2021 based on the valuation of $4.5 billion
193
00:10:25.545 --> 00:10:26.645
in 2022.
194
00:10:26.695 --> 00:10:29.325
There is a renegotiation in February
195
00:10:29.475 --> 00:10:32.165
because the value of circle is skyrocketing.
196
00:10:32.515 --> 00:10:34.485
$9 billion is a new value,
197
00:10:35.145 --> 00:10:38.685
but when you want to go public, you need to propose some
198
00:10:39.245 --> 00:10:42.125
documents which have to be validated by the Securities
199
00:10:42.265 --> 00:10:43.845
and Exchange Commission and
200
00:10:43.845 --> 00:10:48.245
because of the accident in May, 2022, the SEC is extremely
201
00:10:48.885 --> 00:10:52.085
skeptical and ous, there is a collapse of terror,
202
00:10:52.185 --> 00:10:56.085
but there is a collapse of so of FTX and so on and so forth,
203
00:10:56.665 --> 00:10:58.285
but they are going to extend the
204
00:10:58.525 --> 00:10:59.925
deadlines and so on so forth.
205
00:10:59.985 --> 00:11:01.405
At the end of it as a project is going
206
00:11:01.405 --> 00:11:04.925
to be abundant in December, 2022.
207
00:11:07.235 --> 00:11:08.695
Now we are in 2025
208
00:11:09.195 --> 00:11:12.415
and the IPO of circle is a huge success,
209
00:11:12.795 --> 00:11:15.695
but the company is sending two messages to the investors.
210
00:11:16.315 --> 00:11:18.415
The first one is a mission statement of the company.
211
00:11:18.715 --> 00:11:22.335
We want to raise global economic prosperity, frictionless
212
00:11:23.015 --> 00:11:24.215
exchange of value.
213
00:11:24.835 --> 00:11:27.215
We facilitated very much these transactions
214
00:11:27.515 --> 00:11:30.055
and at the end of the day there is a positive impact on
215
00:11:30.335 --> 00:11:31.775
economic growth and prosperity,
216
00:11:32.435 --> 00:11:33.815
but there is a second message.
217
00:11:35.405 --> 00:11:37.665
The second message is very much about safety.
218
00:11:38.245 --> 00:11:39.505
Of course it's a cryptocurrency.
219
00:11:39.615 --> 00:11:41.905
It's fully backed digital doors.
220
00:11:42.645 --> 00:11:46.105
Any time, any anywhere you can convert your
221
00:11:46.855 --> 00:11:49.825
uscs in doors one to one,
222
00:11:50.045 --> 00:11:52.425
one USDC is one US dollars.
223
00:11:52.885 --> 00:11:55.565
We have $60 billion in cash
224
00:11:55.565 --> 00:11:59.965
because there are $60 billion of USDC in circulation.
225
00:12:00.495 --> 00:12:02.205
Completely safe process.
226
00:12:04.735 --> 00:12:07.495
I mentioned the skyrocketing valuation of circle.
227
00:12:08.115 --> 00:12:11.255
It can also be observed in the historical funding
228
00:12:11.435 --> 00:12:14.935
of the company source business as usual, Crunchbase
229
00:12:16.015 --> 00:12:17.095
straight equity, a total
230
00:12:17.315 --> 00:12:21.855
of $1.1 billion throughout series A, B, C, et cetera.
231
00:12:22.735 --> 00:12:27.575
A very notable one is 2015 series C, $15 million
232
00:12:28.115 --> 00:12:32.775
coming from Goldman Sachs and IDG the primo valuation.
233
00:12:32.795 --> 00:12:36.735
So before you're cashing the 50 million is $200 million.
234
00:12:37.075 --> 00:12:38.615
So you understand that Goldman Sachs
235
00:12:38.615 --> 00:12:43.215
and I dgs, they are going to hold 20% of the shares, 50 out
236
00:12:43.215 --> 00:12:44.655
of 250.
237
00:12:44.955 --> 00:12:47.735
At that time, the Bitcoin is worth
238
00:12:48.155 --> 00:12:51.895
$225, which can be compared
239
00:12:51.895 --> 00:12:56.495
with a $100,000 plus today, three years later,
240
00:12:56.615 --> 00:13:01.495
a series E 110 million PRI Monet 2.9 billion
241
00:13:01.945 --> 00:13:05.455
Excel venture is going to be the leader three years later,
242
00:13:05.605 --> 00:13:09.415
private equity deal 440 million,
243
00:13:10.225 --> 00:13:12.775
quite the same as the 460 which are raised
244
00:13:12.775 --> 00:13:17.495
through the IPO Premo valuation 4.1 billion with fidelity
245
00:13:18.115 --> 00:13:22.975
20 22, 7 0.3 billion premo 400 million
246
00:13:22.975 --> 00:13:27.335
raised again with again fidelity and BlackRock.
247
00:13:29.705 --> 00:13:30.795
When you list a company
248
00:13:30.855 --> 00:13:34.275
or stock market, you may be make a mistake in the valuation
249
00:13:34.275 --> 00:13:37.795
of the company, but there is another big mistake which is
250
00:13:37.795 --> 00:13:40.515
not selecting the right time for the IPO.
251
00:13:41.015 --> 00:13:45.395
Now today, is it the right time for the IPO of circle?
252
00:13:47.585 --> 00:13:49.245
If you want to build your own answer
253
00:13:49.305 --> 00:13:52.245
to this very difficult question, you can look at the market,
254
00:13:52.315 --> 00:13:54.845
observe the market, and observe the evolution
255
00:13:54.845 --> 00:13:56.845
of your peers in your industry
256
00:13:57.105 --> 00:13:58.525
and their evolution on the market.
257
00:13:59.445 --> 00:14:02.125
Coinbase is kind of a peer, not exactly.
258
00:14:02.645 --> 00:14:03.845
I will tell you a little bit later,
259
00:14:04.425 --> 00:14:05.525
if you look at the evolution
260
00:14:05.525 --> 00:14:07.365
of Coinbase over the last five years,
261
00:14:07.775 --> 00:14:09.405
there are a few surprises.
262
00:14:10.185 --> 00:14:14.245
In 2022, the accident of the cryptocurrency
263
00:14:14.925 --> 00:14:18.645
USD is going to have an impact on all the cryptocurrencies
264
00:14:19.025 --> 00:14:22.325
and there is a very significant drop at that time.
265
00:14:22.325 --> 00:14:27.005
There also a drop of the Nasdaq but not the same size
266
00:14:27.785 --> 00:14:29.925
and so you understand that the fluctuations
267
00:14:29.925 --> 00:14:33.525
of Coinbase are amplifying the fluctuations of the nasdaq,
268
00:14:33.735 --> 00:14:36.325
which is quite consistent with the fact that the beta,
269
00:14:36.505 --> 00:14:38.365
the systematic risk coefficient
270
00:14:38.365 --> 00:14:41.525
of Coinbase is much larger than one.
271
00:14:42.195 --> 00:14:46.525
Then there is a very difficult period from mid 2022 to
272
00:14:47.065 --> 00:14:49.805
end of 2023, beginning of 2024,
273
00:14:50.185 --> 00:14:51.885
and then there's a kind of recovery.
274
00:14:52.465 --> 00:14:55.605
The recovery of the Coinbase is going to be quite the same
275
00:14:55.625 --> 00:14:58.805
as a recovery of the NASDAQ amplified again
276
00:14:58.985 --> 00:15:00.085
and for the same reason.
277
00:15:00.705 --> 00:15:03.165
Now, if you look at the evolution is quite stable over the
278
00:15:03.165 --> 00:15:04.325
last two years
279
00:15:04.835 --> 00:15:08.525
with some very curious situations which happened the last
280
00:15:08.985 --> 00:15:12.405
six months for the NASDAQ and for Coinbase.
281
00:15:15.015 --> 00:15:17.575
Interestingly, if you deep dive in the last six months,
282
00:15:18.115 --> 00:15:21.335
you observe that for the nasdaq it was quite stable
283
00:15:21.435 --> 00:15:23.855
during a couple of months, three months,
284
00:15:24.395 --> 00:15:29.255
and then there was a drop for the Coinbase Global Inc.
285
00:15:29.525 --> 00:15:32.215
Cooperation. There was a kind of stability
286
00:15:32.525 --> 00:15:35.775
with much higher volatility over the same period
287
00:15:35.875 --> 00:15:39.335
and then a drop, a very significant drop beta,
288
00:15:39.365 --> 00:15:41.615
much greater than one and then a recovery
289
00:15:41.995 --> 00:15:45.295
and it seems to be quite stabilized May
290
00:15:45.435 --> 00:15:47.775
and beginning of June for Coinbase,
291
00:15:48.275 --> 00:15:50.095
so maybe it's the right moment,
292
00:15:50.675 --> 00:15:53.695
but Coinbase is a very different company.
293
00:15:55.615 --> 00:15:59.775
Coinbase is not running a stable coin like circle
294
00:16:00.295 --> 00:16:02.175
Coinbase in the trading
295
00:16:02.435 --> 00:16:05.815
and the management of wallets of Bitcoins.
296
00:16:06.515 --> 00:16:10.215
So you immediately understand that the prosperity of Bitcoin
297
00:16:10.715 --> 00:16:13.175
and the prosperity of Coinbase are
298
00:16:13.855 --> 00:16:15.815
absolutely pegged one with each other.
299
00:16:16.595 --> 00:16:19.735
If you look at the evolution of Bitcoin USD price,
300
00:16:20.115 --> 00:16:21.975
you understand that there is some volatility
301
00:16:22.195 --> 00:16:26.255
and then it goes down and then it goes up and stabilizes.
302
00:16:26.795 --> 00:16:29.775
It is quite the same track as Coinbase
303
00:16:31.555 --> 00:16:32.835
plotting on the same graph.
304
00:16:32.855 --> 00:16:34.195
The evolution of the Bitcoin
305
00:16:34.735 --> 00:16:37.275
and the evolution of the stock price of Coinbase.
306
00:16:37.855 --> 00:16:40.155
You understand that the correlation is quite strong
307
00:16:41.275 --> 00:16:42.275
stability and volatility.
308
00:16:42.945 --> 00:16:47.075
Then it goes down, then it goes up, then it stabilizes.
309
00:16:47.855 --> 00:16:49.755
As far as Coinbase is concerned,
310
00:16:49.985 --> 00:16:53.035
it's not exactly the same recovery as the Bitcoin,
311
00:16:53.495 --> 00:16:55.435
but the correlation is quite obvious
312
00:16:55.435 --> 00:16:56.875
between these two assets.
313
00:16:59.285 --> 00:17:02.355
Let's go back now to circle and to its valuation.
314
00:17:03.315 --> 00:17:05.515
I told you that making the financial analysis
315
00:17:05.515 --> 00:17:08.115
and the financial valuation of a company like Circle
316
00:17:08.785 --> 00:17:11.115
operating in an industry which is so chaotic
317
00:17:11.335 --> 00:17:14.155
and unpredictable is really a challenge,
318
00:17:14.575 --> 00:17:18.155
but it's financial valuation X anti expo.
319
00:17:18.335 --> 00:17:21.355
Now the IPO is realized and it's a success.
320
00:17:21.425 --> 00:17:23.515
Then we can calculate valuation metrics.
321
00:17:24.055 --> 00:17:26.835
We know the market cap, we know the enterprise value,
322
00:17:27.095 --> 00:17:30.635
and we can calculate multiples based on the financial
323
00:17:30.635 --> 00:17:32.235
statements of 2024.
324
00:17:33.055 --> 00:17:35.115
The market capitalization at the end of the first
325
00:17:35.135 --> 00:17:38.995
of listing is $22 billion revenues generated
326
00:17:39.095 --> 00:17:40.595
by the company in 2024.
327
00:17:41.215 --> 00:17:45.595
$1.7 billion to the market cap represents more than
328
00:17:46.135 --> 00:17:48.115
10 years of revenues.
329
00:17:48.625 --> 00:17:51.845
It's quite high, but compared with Snowflake 50 euro,
330
00:17:51.985 --> 00:17:56.845
100 euro, it's reasonable between crows shareholders,
331
00:17:56.915 --> 00:17:59.085
capital shareholders contribution
332
00:17:59.085 --> 00:18:03.165
to the financing 1.1 in straight equity, which is
333
00:18:03.165 --> 00:18:05.245
what I described, plus convertible,
334
00:18:05.245 --> 00:18:07.725
preferred renewable, et cetera, et cetera.
335
00:18:07.785 --> 00:18:08.805
2.9 billion.
336
00:18:09.505 --> 00:18:11.685
Now, this is what was injected by investors
337
00:18:11.825 --> 00:18:13.245
and the value is 22 billion.
338
00:18:13.715 --> 00:18:16.005
It's a price to book of 7.6.
339
00:18:16.435 --> 00:18:18.485
It's value creation for the investors.
340
00:18:19.225 --> 00:18:21.245
The price earnings, which is
341
00:18:21.785 --> 00:18:24.925
not extremely illustrative when the company is growing is
342
00:18:24.925 --> 00:18:26.925
140 euros of earnings.
343
00:18:27.345 --> 00:18:31.405
The price value on adjusted EBITDA is 77 adjusted.
344
00:18:31.625 --> 00:18:33.325
Ebitda you remember is the ebitda.
345
00:18:33.425 --> 00:18:35.805
You get rid of the non recurrent items
346
00:18:36.065 --> 00:18:38.165
and you add a stock base compensation,
347
00:18:38.165 --> 00:18:39.765
which is a non-cash item.
348
00:18:40.545 --> 00:18:44.325
Of course, the value of a company is not the EBITDA today is
349
00:18:44.485 --> 00:18:47.525
not the earnings today, it's the evolution of ebitda,
350
00:18:47.845 --> 00:18:49.725
cashflow and earnings in the future.
351
00:18:50.465 --> 00:18:52.965
Now, what do you understand out
352
00:18:52.965 --> 00:18:56.445
of these multiples in the mind of investors, there is a huge
353
00:18:56.975 --> 00:18:58.365
profitable growth.
354
00:19:00.885 --> 00:19:03.275
Let's have a look at growth and profitability
355
00:19:03.415 --> 00:19:05.995
and financial performance, financial characteristics.
356
00:19:06.095 --> 00:19:10.315
At circle, you remember revenue is $1.7 billion
357
00:19:10.415 --> 00:19:11.475
in 2024.
358
00:19:12.215 --> 00:19:14.675
It represents more than twice as much as uh,
359
00:19:14.795 --> 00:19:17.835
revenues generated by the company in 20 22, 2 years before.
360
00:19:18.535 --> 00:19:20.715
If you take the first quarter of 2025,
361
00:19:20.945 --> 00:19:25.475
it's plus 55% against the first quarter of 2024.
362
00:19:26.375 --> 00:19:28.315
The total balance sheet, total assets,
363
00:19:28.315 --> 00:19:29.795
total equity and liabilities.
364
00:19:30.495 --> 00:19:34.035
It was $45.8 billion at the end of 2024,
365
00:19:34.415 --> 00:19:36.635
and it is 62.3 billion at the end
366
00:19:36.635 --> 00:19:37.995
of the first quarter, 2025.
367
00:19:38.855 --> 00:19:43.075
But the key item in assets is fiduciary cash,
368
00:19:43.885 --> 00:19:47.875
$45 billion of cash at the end of 2024.
369
00:19:48.135 --> 00:19:52.115
Why? Because we have issued 45 billion tokens
370
00:19:52.375 --> 00:19:54.835
of $1 each, so we need the cash
371
00:19:55.735 --> 00:20:00.275
and now the fiduciary cash is $61.3 billion at the end
372
00:20:00.275 --> 00:20:04.195
of the first quarter, 2025 for exactly the same reason.
373
00:20:04.655 --> 00:20:06.835
So the balance sheet is the cash
374
00:20:07.215 --> 00:20:10.635
and the liability, which is representing the SDCs.
375
00:20:10.895 --> 00:20:15.315
So stable coins issued by the company, adjusted ebitda.
376
00:20:15.375 --> 00:20:20.235
Now it's about profitability, $285 million,
377
00:20:21.115 --> 00:20:23.835
17% of 2024 revenue,
378
00:20:25.055 --> 00:20:27.515
but the EBITDA is not the free cash flow.
379
00:20:27.855 --> 00:20:32.395
EBITDA minus delta working capital requirement minus CapEx
380
00:20:32.415 --> 00:20:33.595
is about the free cash flow.
381
00:20:34.445 --> 00:20:38.475
CapEx are quite low just capitalized.
382
00:20:39.395 --> 00:20:40.875
Software development expenses
383
00:20:41.015 --> 00:20:45.195
and CapEx are significantly overpaid by the interest income.
384
00:20:45.775 --> 00:20:48.245
The interest income is the income you generate out
385
00:20:48.265 --> 00:20:51.285
of investing your cash in risk-free securities.
386
00:20:52.155 --> 00:20:53.685
Well, it's a financial income,
387
00:20:53.825 --> 00:20:55.445
but this cash is so much
388
00:20:56.125 --> 00:20:57.925
embedded in your business operations.
389
00:20:58.195 --> 00:21:00.645
Then you can qualify this interest income
390
00:21:00.905 --> 00:21:02.085
as an operating income.
391
00:21:02.755 --> 00:21:05.605
What about the working capital requirement? It's negative.
392
00:21:06.105 --> 00:21:07.205
So if you are growing,
393
00:21:07.745 --> 00:21:10.445
you are not financing an increase in the working capital
394
00:21:10.475 --> 00:21:13.645
requirement, you generate a resource which is an
395
00:21:13.725 --> 00:21:16.525
increasingly negative working capital requirement,
396
00:21:16.525 --> 00:21:18.645
so you understand that the company is growing,
397
00:21:19.025 --> 00:21:20.845
the company is generating an ebitda,
398
00:21:20.985 --> 00:21:24.485
and the EBITDA is straight free cash flow,
399
00:21:24.935 --> 00:21:28.365
which is in your pocket and remunerating your investors.
400
00:21:29.055 --> 00:21:30.565
These are about the financial
401
00:21:30.565 --> 00:21:31.885
characteristics of the company.
402
00:21:32.435 --> 00:21:34.885
It's about profitable growth.
403
00:21:35.225 --> 00:21:37.365
Growth, transform into profit
404
00:21:37.705 --> 00:21:40.005
and profit, transform into cash.
405
00:21:42.695 --> 00:21:45.395
Now, in order to conclude this vidcast, I would like to say
406
00:21:45.545 --> 00:21:49.155
that there is a word which is absolutely fundamental central
407
00:21:49.695 --> 00:21:54.195
in all these developments, which is trust the investors,
408
00:21:54.405 --> 00:21:57.035
trust the ability of the company to generate growth
409
00:21:57.575 --> 00:22:00.555
and transforms this growth into profits and so on, so forth.
410
00:22:00.975 --> 00:22:03.595
But the stakeholders, they trust the liquidity
411
00:22:03.595 --> 00:22:07.155
of the company, the quality of execution, the robustness
412
00:22:07.255 --> 00:22:09.915
of the operations is about liquidity
413
00:22:10.735 --> 00:22:12.635
and then why do you trust the liquidity?
414
00:22:12.635 --> 00:22:15.435
Because the company is operating in an environment which is
415
00:22:15.435 --> 00:22:20.395
about regulation, strict regulation, the New York state
416
00:22:21.355 --> 00:22:24.275
selected by the founders of the company to run the business,
417
00:22:25.095 --> 00:22:27.235
and once you have selected this environment,
418
00:22:27.365 --> 00:22:29.155
there are some people who are in charge
419
00:22:29.215 --> 00:22:30.795
of auditing your figures
420
00:22:30.795 --> 00:22:32.755
and confirming that the figures,
421
00:22:32.985 --> 00:22:35.675
they provide a fair picture about how the company is doing.
422
00:22:36.405 --> 00:22:39.435
Trust is absolutely al in any
423
00:22:39.835 --> 00:22:41.435
economic activity of the world.
424
00:22:42.145 --> 00:22:46.195
It's even more true in a business such as cryptocurrency,
425
00:22:46.645 --> 00:22:50.115
which is today an extremely chaotic industry.
426
00:22:50.905 --> 00:22:52.575
Thank you very much. I.
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast, which is diverted to a company operating in a cryptocurrency industry and which realized very recently an extremely successful IPO circle.
A few weeks ago on the 27th of May, 2025, the company communicated a rage for the issue prize, which was supposedly happening a few days later.
The range was 25 to 26 US dollars a week later, the 4th of June, the final issue prize is announced $31, which is about 20% more than the upper part of the range.
At the end of the day, two days later, the 6th of June, the opening price is not going to be 31, it's going to be 96.
The highest is going to be achieved during this day at 124, which is exactly four times the issue price.
Then there will be a small decline and the stock price will close at 107.7, which is plus 247% against the issue price of $31.
When the closing price at the end of the first day of listing represents more than three times as much as the issue price, you can directly conclude that it was a very significant underpricing in the process.
For June 6th Circle high PO leaves more than $1.7 billion on the table.
Seven's biggest underpricing indicates in fact, when you calculate 34 million shares offered to the market and you multiply that by the difference 96, which is the opening price and 31 which is the issue price, you even get $2.2 billion seven's biggest underpricing in the list rivian for the car industry, 2.6 billion snowflake, top of the list number one, $3.7 billion.
But if you remember the film which was produced by the academy about the IPO of Snowflake, the opening market cap is 50 years of revenues.
The closing market cap at the end of the first day of listing is 100 years of revenues, which is extremely high.
Of course, later on there would be some disappointment.
Of course there was a mistake, but it's always much easier to predict the path than to anticipate the future and it's quite easy to understand as well that making the financial analysis a financial valuation of a company operating in a cryptocurrency business and trying to anticipate the reactions of the investors is extremely difficult, especially those days when the cryptocurrency industry is volatile and quite unpredictable.
There were two objectives in this IPO.
The first one, traditional is about financing growth, but the second one is providing an exit to some historical called investors, which were absolutely significant in the financing and development of the company.
So 34 million shares were offered to the market.
14.8 million were issued and sold against cash at $31 per share.
It represents $460 million cash in the bank account of the company.
19.2 million shares were sold from investors, which had been so significant in the development of the company.
So you provide an exit, a partial exit to for example Goldman Sachs.
A few dates are quite important in the history circle.
Further creation in 2013 by Jeremy Allaire and Sean Neville.
In 2015, they obtained a bid license for the company name and what's interesting is that they decide to operate from the New York state, which is very well known for a strict regulation for cryptocurrencies.
Strict regulation means resilience, transparency, quality and robustness of execution.
At the end of the day, trust for the stakeholders very important point.
In 2016, they start and stop circle pay and application.
They launch under withdraw, but the turning point is 2018 when the consortium is launching a stable coin, which is based backed by the US dollar.
The name of the consortium is center.
The two main actors are circle and coin base and the name of the stablecoin is USDC.
Now going to share the governance up to 2023.
Now circle either one and unique company in charge of full governance of the stable coin.
What is a stable coin? First, it's a cryptocurrency.
It's a digital currency which is mobilizing and using the blockchain technology.
The Bitcoin is also a cryptocurrency, but the value of the Bitcoin depends on the evolution of supply and demand.
It's not the case for a stable coin.
It drags the evolution of a reference currency.
It's pegged to the evolution of the reference currency.
In this case it's a US dollar, but it might be the Euro or any robust robust currency.
The objective is to facilitate secure transactions secure because of blockchain and facilitate because you can exchange US dollars without holding them.
You hold something which looks like something which follows, which tracks the US dollars.
As far as the US dollar is concerned, there are two main players for stable coins.
Tether is the largest one.
The name of the stable coin is USDT and the capitalization is $110 billion.
Circle is number two with USDC and with $60 billion of capitalization, but the reputation of circle is to be much more transparent and regulated than its competitor.
Probably the main challenge which is met by companies operating in a stable con business is a combination of convertibility and liquidity.
A token A-U-S-D-C is worth by construction $1.
So if for example, you want to buy a token which is created by circle, you are going to buy one token created against cash of $1, but you may be also motivated of doing the other way around.
So you want to convert the token which you hold into cash and then you are going to ask maybe to circle to do the conversion.
There will be a bank transfer and you are going to get your money back maybe minus some fees, but in order to do so, the USD must be available in the bank account of C and then you can enter the liquidity of the tokens, the liquidity of the USDC as a stable coin.
Then you understand that the cash which is held by circle has to be invested in assets which are risk-free and liquid.
Sometimes there are some unpleasant surprises.
You remember the bank, Silicon Valley Bank, very well known for investing its cash in risk-free assets such as long-term US government bonds and so on and so forth Because of evolution of interest rate and mark to market accounting SVB went bankrupt, but there were $3.3 billion of circle cash invested in SVB and so during a short period of time, the company circle had to interrupt the conversion up to the moment when a financial institution provided a warranty on the assets of SVB.
That was quite unpleasant and a risky moment for the stakeholders in order to meet the challenge and the requirements of convertibility and liquidity.
There are different backing methods.
The one which is quite resilient and robust and the one which I described is about fiat money.
So you hold as much fiat currency as tokens you have issued created 10 billion tokens at $1 each.
You hold $10 billion in your bank account.
Its name Fiat collateralized.
Another way to do the same thing is to hold another cryptocurrency, which its itself is fiat collateralized and then this other cryptocurrency serves as a kind of intermediary collateral.
Its name crypto collateralized.
Some stable coins are not that stable I would say they are backed by algorithmic backing and it corresponds to a kind of adjustment supply demand adjustment, which is extremely risky.
We have terrible examples about that as far as US backed stable coins are concerned, the big accident is May, 2022.
The name of stable coin is UST and it's backed by terror.
It's about algorithmic stable coin.
Then there was an arbitrage mechanism with another cryptocurrency, which is named Luna.
Not getting into the detail what happened, but there was a panic.
There was a UST sell off massive Luna dilution and value destruction evaporated $45 billion consequences, loss of trust, especially in non collateralized algorithmic stable coins.
The value distraction, the evaporation of $45 billion is not the only negative consequence of the accident of terra UST.
There is another collateral damage, which is the unsuccessful IPO of circle via a spac, a special purpose acquisition company.
The company wanted to go public merger IPO agreement with Concord in 2021 based on the valuation of $4.5 billion in 2022.
There is a renegotiation in February because the value of circle is skyrocketing.
$9 billion is a new value, but when you want to go public, you need to propose some documents which have to be validated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and because of the accident in May, 2022, the SEC is extremely skeptical and ous, there is a collapse of terror, but there is a collapse of so of FTX and so on and so forth, but they are going to extend the deadlines and so on so forth.
At the end of it as a project is going to be abundant in December, 2022.
Now we are in 2025 and the IPO of circle is a huge success, but the company is sending two messages to the investors.
The first one is a mission statement of the company.
We want to raise global economic prosperity, frictionless exchange of value.
We facilitated very much these transactions and at the end of the day there is a positive impact on economic growth and prosperity, but there is a second message.
The second message is very much about safety.
Of course it's a cryptocurrency.
It's fully backed digital doors.
Any time, any anywhere you can convert your uscs in doors one to one, one USDC is one US dollars.
We have $60 billion in cash because there are $60 billion of USDC in circulation.
Completely safe process.
I mentioned the skyrocketing valuation of circle.
It can also be observed in the historical funding of the company source business as usual, Crunchbase straight equity, a total of $1.1 billion throughout series A, B, C, et cetera.
A very notable one is 2015 series C, $15 million coming from Goldman Sachs and IDG the primo valuation.
So before you're cashing the 50 million is $200 million.
So you understand that Goldman Sachs and I dgs, they are going to hold 20% of the shares, 50 out of 250.
At that time, the Bitcoin is worth $225, which can be compared with a $100,000 plus today, three years later, a series E 110 million PRI Monet 2.9 billion Excel venture is going to be the leader three years later, private equity deal 440 million, quite the same as the 460 which are raised through the IPO Premo valuation 4.1 billion with fidelity 20 22, 7 0.3 billion premo 400 million raised again with again fidelity and BlackRock.
When you list a company or stock market, you may be make a mistake in the valuation of the company, but there is another big mistake which is not selecting the right time for the IPO.
Now today, is it the right time for the IPO of circle? If you want to build your own answer to this very difficult question, you can look at the market, observe the market, and observe the evolution of your peers in your industry and their evolution on the market.
Coinbase is kind of a peer, not exactly.
I will tell you a little bit later, if you look at the evolution of Coinbase over the last five years, there are a few surprises.
In 2022, the accident of the cryptocurrency USD is going to have an impact on all the cryptocurrencies and there is a very significant drop at that time.
There also a drop of the Nasdaq but not the same size and so you understand that the fluctuations of Coinbase are amplifying the fluctuations of the nasdaq, which is quite consistent with the fact that the beta, the systematic risk coefficient of Coinbase is much larger than one.
Then there is a very difficult period from mid 2022 to end of 2023, beginning of 2024, and then there's a kind of recovery.
The recovery of the Coinbase is going to be quite the same as a recovery of the NASDAQ amplified again and for the same reason.
Now, if you look at the evolution is quite stable over the last two years with some very curious situations which happened the last six months for the NASDAQ and for Coinbase.
Interestingly, if you deep dive in the last six months, you observe that for the nasdaq it was quite stable during a couple of months, three months, and then there was a drop for the Coinbase Global Inc.
Cooperation.
There was a kind of stability with much higher volatility over the same period and then a drop, a very significant drop beta, much greater than one and then a recovery and it seems to be quite stabilized May and beginning of June for Coinbase, so maybe it's the right moment, but Coinbase is a very different company.
Coinbase is not running a stable coin like circle Coinbase in the trading and the management of wallets of Bitcoins.
So you immediately understand that the prosperity of Bitcoin and the prosperity of Coinbase are absolutely pegged one with each other.
If you look at the evolution of Bitcoin USD price, you understand that there is some volatility and then it goes down and then it goes up and stabilizes.
It is quite the same track as Coinbase plotting on the same graph.
The evolution of the Bitcoin and the evolution of the stock price of Coinbase.
You understand that the correlation is quite strong stability and volatility.
Then it goes down, then it goes up, then it stabilizes.
As far as Coinbase is concerned, it's not exactly the same recovery as the Bitcoin, but the correlation is quite obvious between these two assets.
Let's go back now to circle and to its valuation.
I told you that making the financial analysis and the financial valuation of a company like Circle operating in an industry which is so chaotic and unpredictable is really a challenge, but it's financial valuation X anti expo.
Now the IPO is realized and it's a success.
Then we can calculate valuation metrics.
We know the market cap, we know the enterprise value, and we can calculate multiples based on the financial statements of 2024.
The market capitalization at the end of the first of listing is $22 billion revenues generated by the company in 2024.
$1.7 billion to the market cap represents more than 10 years of revenues.
It's quite high, but compared with Snowflake 50 euro, 100 euro, it's reasonable between crows shareholders, capital shareholders contribution to the financing 1.1 in straight equity, which is what I described, plus convertible, preferred renewable, et cetera, et cetera.
2.9 billion.
Now, this is what was injected by investors and the value is 22 billion.
It's a price to book of 7.6.
It's value creation for the investors.
The price earnings, which is not extremely illustrative when the company is growing is 140 euros of earnings.
The price value on adjusted EBITDA is 77 adjusted.
Ebitda you remember is the ebitda.
You get rid of the non recurrent items and you add a stock base compensation, which is a non-cash item.
Of course, the value of a company is not the EBITDA today is not the earnings today, it's the evolution of ebitda, cashflow and earnings in the future.
Now, what do you understand out of these multiples in the mind of investors, there is a huge profitable growth.
Let's have a look at growth and profitability and financial performance, financial characteristics.
At circle, you remember revenue is $1.7 billion in 2024.
It represents more than twice as much as uh, revenues generated by the company in 20 22, 2 years before.
If you take the first quarter of 2025, it's plus 55% against the first quarter of 2024.
The total balance sheet, total assets, total equity and liabilities.
It was $45.8 billion at the end of 2024, and it is 62.3 billion at the end of the first quarter, 2025.
But the key item in assets is fiduciary cash, $45 billion of cash at the end of 2024.
Why? Because we have issued 45 billion tokens of $1 each, so we need the cash and now the fiduciary cash is $61.3 billion at the end of the first quarter, 2025 for exactly the same reason.
So the balance sheet is the cash and the liability, which is representing the SDCs.
So stable coins issued by the company, adjusted ebitda.
Now it's about profitability, $285 million, 17% of 2024 revenue, but the EBITDA is not the free cash flow.
EBITDA minus delta working capital requirement minus CapEx is about the free cash flow.
CapEx are quite low just capitalized.
Software development expenses and CapEx are significantly overpaid by the interest income.
The interest income is the income you generate out of investing your cash in risk-free securities.
Well, it's a financial income, but this cash is so much embedded in your business operations.
Then you can qualify this interest income as an operating income.
What about the working capital requirement? It's negative.
So if you are growing, you are not financing an increase in the working capital requirement, you generate a resource which is an increasingly negative working capital requirement, so you understand that the company is growing, the company is generating an ebitda, and the EBITDA is straight free cash flow, which is in your pocket and remunerating your investors.
These are about the financial characteristics of the company.
It's about profitable growth.
Growth, transform into profit and profit, transform into cash.
Now, in order to conclude this vidcast, I would like to say that there is a word which is absolutely fundamental central in all these developments, which is trust the investors, trust the ability of the company to generate growth and transforms this growth into profits and so on, so forth.
But the stakeholders, they trust the liquidity of the company, the quality of execution, the robustness of the operations is about liquidity and then why do you trust the liquidity? Because the company is operating in an environment which is about regulation, strict regulation, the New York state selected by the founders of the company to run the business, and once you have selected this environment, there are some people who are in charge of auditing your figures and confirming that the figures, they provide a fair picture about how the company is doing.
Trust is absolutely al in any economic activity of the world.
It's even more true in a business such as cryptocurrency, which is today an extremely chaotic industry.
Thank you very much.
I.