March 2024 Vidcast // Athens airport: financial rationality and listing
The case for privatizing a major airport
WEBVTT
1
00:00:08.665 --> 00:00:10.695
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast
2
00:00:11.225 --> 00:00:13.855
which will give us the opportunity to analyze
3
00:00:13.955 --> 00:00:18.215
and observe the different statuses that an asset can take
4
00:00:18.725 --> 00:00:21.975
private asset versus public asset.
5
00:00:22.635 --> 00:00:26.255
And we are going to use the example of the recent listing
6
00:00:26.595 --> 00:00:30.295
of the International Airport of Athens In Greece
7
00:00:32.595 --> 00:00:35.295
before the listing there was a price range
8
00:00:35.795 --> 00:00:37.175
for the stock price
9
00:00:37.835 --> 00:00:40.495
and the price range was ranging from pessimistic
10
00:00:40.495 --> 00:00:45.295
to optimistic, from seven euros to 8.2 euros per share.
11
00:00:46.275 --> 00:00:50.375
At the end of the day, the price which was decided was 8.2,
12
00:00:51.035 --> 00:00:52.375
the upper side of the range,
13
00:00:52.995 --> 00:00:57.975
and quite quickly the stock price went too high of 9.6 euros
14
00:00:57.975 --> 00:01:01.575
because investors were quite enthusiastic about the offer.
15
00:01:02.745 --> 00:01:05.855
Today, March 13, when I record this with
16
00:01:06.555 --> 00:01:09.335
the stock price is about 8.7 euros.
17
00:01:09.875 --> 00:01:12.655
The market has been quite stable throughout the months
18
00:01:12.995 --> 00:01:15.815
and so at the end of the day it was a right price.
19
00:01:16.825 --> 00:01:18.535
Today market capitalization
20
00:01:18.835 --> 00:01:22.575
of a i A is 2.6 billion euros.
21
00:01:23.115 --> 00:01:27.055
The demand from the investors was 8.6 billion euros,
22
00:01:27.505 --> 00:01:30.175
which gives you an idea about the enthusiasm
23
00:01:30.175 --> 00:01:32.535
of the investors in the listing.
24
00:01:34.155 --> 00:01:36.855
Now a few dates to observe the chronology.
25
00:01:37.795 --> 00:01:39.935
The first date is 2001.
26
00:01:40.485 --> 00:01:42.935
It's the opening of the airport, the integration
27
00:01:42.955 --> 00:01:47.135
of the airport, a left areas vene, which was given
28
00:01:47.515 --> 00:01:48.655
as a name to the airport
29
00:01:48.685 --> 00:01:52.775
because of a very famous political person in Greece.
30
00:01:53.235 --> 00:01:57.215
The first plane which landed in Akins was coming
31
00:01:57.285 --> 00:01:58.295
from Montreal.
32
00:01:59.475 --> 00:02:02.095
The reason why a new airport was built
33
00:02:02.275 --> 00:02:05.895
by Greece is the Olympic Games, which took place
34
00:02:06.475 --> 00:02:07.655
in 2004.
35
00:02:07.865 --> 00:02:11.335
There was an urgent need for a new efficient
36
00:02:11.415 --> 00:02:12.655
and modern airport,
37
00:02:13.955 --> 00:02:17.375
but very often when you build such a very
38
00:02:17.965 --> 00:02:19.375
expensive construction,
39
00:02:19.995 --> 00:02:22.255
you use a public private partnership.
40
00:02:22.955 --> 00:02:24.855
So basically there will be a number
41
00:02:24.855 --> 00:02:27.375
of investors contributing to the construction,
42
00:02:27.395 --> 00:02:31.095
the operations throughout a concession who's going
43
00:02:31.095 --> 00:02:33.855
to be in charge, a very well known German captain,
44
00:02:33.855 --> 00:02:36.415
and in a construction business whose name is tif
45
00:02:37.115 --> 00:02:38.175
and TIF is going
46
00:02:38.175 --> 00:02:41.775
to start running a business about running airports.
47
00:02:42.775 --> 00:02:47.255
TIF F Airport is going to be created in 1997, uh,
48
00:02:47.255 --> 00:02:50.895
taking the opportunity of the airport of Athens.
49
00:02:51.675 --> 00:02:54.655
At the end of the day, you create a special purpose vehicle,
50
00:02:54.975 --> 00:02:57.575
a company which is going to run throughout the concession.
51
00:02:58.595 --> 00:03:03.485
HTI Airport holds 40% of the shares plus 60 shares,
52
00:03:03.485 --> 00:03:06.805
so a little bit more than 40%, which is going
53
00:03:06.805 --> 00:03:07.925
to be absolutely crucial.
54
00:03:08.565 --> 00:03:10.085
I will explain you why in a few minutes.
55
00:03:10.385 --> 00:03:15.125
The Greek state keeps retains 55% of the shares
56
00:03:15.265 --> 00:03:17.245
and then is controlling the airport.
57
00:03:18.485 --> 00:03:21.845
A family known in Greece to be, uh,
58
00:03:21.895 --> 00:03:25.485
quite involved in concession and construction to cop's.
59
00:03:25.485 --> 00:03:30.165
Family is going to hold 5%, a little bit less than 5%
60
00:03:30.165 --> 00:03:34.765
of the shares, so 5% minus 60 shares, so plus 60
61
00:03:35.225 --> 00:03:37.885
for TIF and minus 60 for the family.
62
00:03:38.415 --> 00:03:42.415
Again, it's going to be quite a, as you all know,
63
00:03:42.595 --> 00:03:47.255
in 2009 there will be the explosion of the subprime crisis.
64
00:03:47.435 --> 00:03:48.655
So it's going to be an economic
65
00:03:48.715 --> 00:03:50.535
and financial crisis for the whole planet
66
00:03:51.195 --> 00:03:52.975
and probably more for Greece
67
00:03:52.975 --> 00:03:56.215
because there will be some problems which are going
68
00:03:56.215 --> 00:03:58.015
to be discovered in sovereign debt.
69
00:03:58.955 --> 00:04:02.375
As a consequence, a country is going to take commitments,
70
00:04:02.915 --> 00:04:05.215
is going to create a privatization fund.
71
00:04:05.395 --> 00:04:09.575
You have to sell assets just to be able to reduce the amount
72
00:04:09.575 --> 00:04:12.055
of indebtedness in the country.
73
00:04:13.355 --> 00:04:15.495
The Hellenic Corporation of Assets
74
00:04:15.795 --> 00:04:18.055
and Participation is a financial holding
75
00:04:18.715 --> 00:04:22.735
in which they are most of the assets owned by the state.
76
00:04:23.925 --> 00:04:28.495
HCAP owns 55% of the airport at the very beginning.
77
00:04:28.565 --> 00:04:30.375
This is what I was explaining,
78
00:04:31.115 --> 00:04:35.175
but today the fund owns only 25%
79
00:04:36.175 --> 00:04:37.655
directly in the airport
80
00:04:37.655 --> 00:04:41.775
because 30% of the shares were put in a fund,
81
00:04:41.775 --> 00:04:45.815
which was a dedicated privatization fund whose name is
82
00:04:45.895 --> 00:04:49.375
Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund.
83
00:04:51.715 --> 00:04:53.175
In parallel, something happens,
84
00:04:53.175 --> 00:04:56.055
which is quite important in Canada, it's a creation
85
00:04:56.055 --> 00:04:57.535
of PSP investment.
86
00:04:58.445 --> 00:05:02.855
It's a Canadian public sector pension investment board.
87
00:05:03.805 --> 00:05:06.695
Basically, this pension fund is in charge of
88
00:05:07.375 --> 00:05:08.775
managing the pension of a number
89
00:05:08.775 --> 00:05:11.455
of people coming from the public sector.
90
00:05:11.835 --> 00:05:13.695
And today as a total assets managed
91
00:05:13.755 --> 00:05:16.495
by the fund are about 250
92
00:05:16.995 --> 00:05:19.655
to 300 billion Canadian dollars.
93
00:05:19.795 --> 00:05:21.815
So it's absolutely not negligible.
94
00:05:21.835 --> 00:05:25.375
In 2030 PSP is acquiring
95
00:05:25.885 --> 00:05:28.775
four teeth airport GA and Beha
96
00:05:28.775 --> 00:05:33.375
because it's a German company, very often this kind
97
00:05:33.375 --> 00:05:35.975
of pension fund is investing in infrastructure
98
00:05:35.975 --> 00:05:38.135
because it's about long term concessions
99
00:05:38.395 --> 00:05:40.815
and reasonably predictable cash flows.
100
00:05:41.755 --> 00:05:45.295
HTI Airport is going to be renamed AVI Alliance
101
00:05:45.995 --> 00:05:48.215
and it's still headquartered in d***o.
102
00:05:48.365 --> 00:05:50.655
It's a German company according to Z Low.
103
00:05:51.435 --> 00:05:56.135
Now the company is running the airport in Athens, Greece,
104
00:05:56.515 --> 00:06:00.965
but also Germany, Hungary, Albania, Australia
105
00:06:01.025 --> 00:06:02.045
and Puerto Rico.
106
00:06:02.265 --> 00:06:05.125
So it's quite diversified infrastructure fund.
107
00:06:05.295 --> 00:06:09.405
Today if we go back to Greece,
108
00:06:09.745 --> 00:06:12.525
of course a country has been hit by the subprime crisis
109
00:06:13.265 --> 00:06:15.565
and the sovereign debt problems.
110
00:06:16.355 --> 00:06:20.405
Financial consolidation is needed prioritizations,
111
00:06:20.905 --> 00:06:23.685
but as far as air transportation is concerned,
112
00:06:24.505 --> 00:06:27.205
the planet was hit by COVID-19.
113
00:06:27.435 --> 00:06:32.165
Traffic went down by 60% in Athens for domestic flights
114
00:06:32.785 --> 00:06:36.485
and about 90% for international flights.
115
00:06:37.025 --> 00:06:40.565
Now the Covid is obviously a bit behind us
116
00:06:41.065 --> 00:06:43.365
and domestic flights are back to normal,
117
00:06:44.065 --> 00:06:47.405
almost international flights, not quite some,
118
00:06:47.865 --> 00:06:50.845
but basically it's getting better and better.
119
00:06:53.665 --> 00:06:56.005
Now there are some other good news as far
120
00:06:56.005 --> 00:06:57.285
as Greece is concerned.
121
00:06:58.065 --> 00:07:00.165
As a consequence of the crisis, the company
122
00:07:00.715 --> 00:07:04.685
sovereign debt was speculative grade BB plus
123
00:07:05.625 --> 00:07:07.405
in October, 2023, standard
124
00:07:07.425 --> 00:07:08.685
and pools decided
125
00:07:08.685 --> 00:07:11.965
to be a little bit more positive about Greece
126
00:07:12.545 --> 00:07:16.485
and move the rating from BB plus to triple B minus,
127
00:07:17.505 --> 00:07:19.205
and this one notch
128
00:07:19.305 --> 00:07:22.005
of transformed the country from speculative
129
00:07:22.025 --> 00:07:25.405
to investment grade feature followed in
130
00:07:25.605 --> 00:07:30.005
December, 2023 from BB plus two,
131
00:07:30.185 --> 00:07:33.565
triple B minus in the country.
132
00:07:33.635 --> 00:07:35.645
Tourism is absolutely fundamental.
133
00:07:35.905 --> 00:07:38.685
It represents 18% of GDP
134
00:07:39.345 --> 00:07:43.765
and it employs 900,000 people, which is about 20%
135
00:07:43.905 --> 00:07:46.325
of the total employed people in Greece.
136
00:07:46.905 --> 00:07:48.805
So that's absolutely phenomenal.
137
00:07:49.025 --> 00:07:51.005
Athens plays a huge role
138
00:07:51.005 --> 00:07:54.805
because it welcomes 35% of foreign visitors
139
00:07:55.425 --> 00:07:58.285
and the extremely good news about the airport is
140
00:07:58.285 --> 00:08:00.925
that it is a real cash machine.
141
00:08:03.575 --> 00:08:05.245
Let's first have a look at the p
142
00:08:05.245 --> 00:08:07.685
and l financial metrics of the airport.
143
00:08:08.505 --> 00:08:11.485
The revenues generated by the airport in 2023
144
00:08:12.105 --> 00:08:15.045
are about 600 million, uh,
145
00:08:15.105 --> 00:08:17.685
by 27% against 2022.
146
00:08:18.145 --> 00:08:22.125
2022 was up by 25% against 2021,
147
00:08:22.625 --> 00:08:24.485
but it is the consequence of the
148
00:08:25.165 --> 00:08:27.685
recovery from Covid increase in the traffic.
149
00:08:28.705 --> 00:08:32.805
Now the EBITDA is absolutely great, 400 million,
150
00:08:32.815 --> 00:08:35.925
which represents 67% to revenues.
151
00:08:36.425 --> 00:08:39.925
It was 69% in 2022, but it's a strong p
152
00:08:39.925 --> 00:08:41.765
and l strong performance as far
153
00:08:41.765 --> 00:08:43.365
as the return on sales is concerned
154
00:08:43.705 --> 00:08:47.165
and it is transforming to a high return on sales as far
155
00:08:47.165 --> 00:08:48.485
as EBIT is concerned,
156
00:08:49.015 --> 00:08:53.325
54% in 20 23, 50 2% in 2022.
157
00:08:53.745 --> 00:08:57.005
So the p and a is quite strong earning earnings per share.
158
00:08:57.025 --> 00:09:00.205
The bottom line is going to show some nice progresses.
159
00:09:00.905 --> 00:09:03.565
The earnings per share in 2023 are earned
160
00:09:03.625 --> 00:09:06.765
by 37% against 2022.
161
00:09:07.395 --> 00:09:11.325
Well, the p and l is strong, but the p and l is not the p
162
00:09:11.325 --> 00:09:13.645
and l is about the return on sales,
163
00:09:13.785 --> 00:09:16.125
but it's not about the financial performance as a company.
164
00:09:16.785 --> 00:09:19.245
The financial performance is represented by the ability
165
00:09:19.265 --> 00:09:21.645
of the company to generate a return on capital,
166
00:09:21.735 --> 00:09:24.845
which is more than the weighted average cost of capital,
167
00:09:25.345 --> 00:09:27.365
the return which is expected by investors
168
00:09:27.665 --> 00:09:29.365
to remunerate risk.
169
00:09:30.465 --> 00:09:32.525
Now you have to calculate the capital employed.
170
00:09:32.585 --> 00:09:35.325
It was 1.1 in 2023
171
00:09:35.665 --> 00:09:38.525
and about 1.4 in 2022.
172
00:09:39.305 --> 00:09:42.205
So there is a kind of asset management in order
173
00:09:42.265 --> 00:09:43.645
to reduce the capital employed.
174
00:09:44.305 --> 00:09:45.885
Now when the capital employee is down
175
00:09:46.065 --> 00:09:48.885
and in the meantime the revenues are up, you understand
176
00:09:48.885 --> 00:09:51.085
that the assets productivity is going
177
00:09:51.085 --> 00:09:53.445
to be very significantly up.
178
00:09:53.905 --> 00:09:55.405
We are going to discuss that in a minute,
179
00:09:56.065 --> 00:09:57.685
but what is also very important
180
00:09:57.745 --> 00:10:00.325
to understand is the evolution of the financial structure
181
00:10:00.345 --> 00:10:04.925
of the financial strategy of the company in 2022, the 1.4
182
00:10:05.105 --> 00:10:07.565
or more or less, 1 billion in equity
183
00:10:07.825 --> 00:10:09.765
and 400 million in debt.
184
00:10:10.555 --> 00:10:14.005
Then the gearing debt over equity is about 0.4.
185
00:10:15.185 --> 00:10:17.645
As a consequence of strong dividend payments,
186
00:10:18.105 --> 00:10:22.285
the equity is down to half a billion in 2023
187
00:10:22.865 --> 00:10:26.405
and it's about 600 million of net financial debt.
188
00:10:26.405 --> 00:10:29.365
Then the gearing is 1.32.
189
00:10:30.225 --> 00:10:32.685
The airport, the company decided to
190
00:10:33.525 --> 00:10:37.485
leverage the business paying a huge amount of dividend.
191
00:10:37.705 --> 00:10:41.765
The dividend which was paid in 2022 is 200 million
192
00:10:42.665 --> 00:10:46.365
in twenty twenty three, five hundred and fifty 5 million.
193
00:10:46.905 --> 00:10:49.645
And when you look at the balance sheet at the end of 2023,
194
00:10:49.665 --> 00:10:51.125
you observe dividend payable
195
00:10:51.185 --> 00:10:55.645
of an additional 130 million euros.
196
00:10:56.155 --> 00:10:58.165
This is quite a huge amount of money
197
00:10:58.865 --> 00:11:00.645
and it is a financial strategy of the company.
198
00:11:01.585 --> 00:11:04.005
Now, does it put the company at risk or not?
199
00:11:04.005 --> 00:11:05.605
This is another question,
200
00:11:05.665 --> 00:11:08.005
but as far as cash flows are concerned,
201
00:11:08.185 --> 00:11:09.845
the question is can you finance growth?
202
00:11:10.385 --> 00:11:11.445
And the answer is, well,
203
00:11:11.715 --> 00:11:16.525
capital expenditures represent about 50 million in 2022
204
00:11:16.785 --> 00:11:17.805
and 2023.
205
00:11:18.225 --> 00:11:21.565
The EBITDA you remember is 400 million,
206
00:11:21.905 --> 00:11:26.365
though EBITDA is eight times CapEx as far
207
00:11:26.365 --> 00:11:27.805
as the free cash was concerned,
208
00:11:27.975 --> 00:11:30.045
there is absolutely no problem.
209
00:11:31.595 --> 00:11:33.045
Basically, there are two ways
210
00:11:33.065 --> 00:11:35.125
to calculate the return capital employee.
211
00:11:35.385 --> 00:11:38.485
The first one is to directly divide the EBIT
212
00:11:38.485 --> 00:11:39.605
by the cap employee.
213
00:11:40.785 --> 00:11:42.085
The second way is
214
00:11:42.125 --> 00:11:45.365
to remember the deploy in the more formula, which say
215
00:11:45.365 --> 00:11:49.365
that first you divide EBIT by sales, by revenues,
216
00:11:49.365 --> 00:11:50.605
and you get the return on sales.
217
00:11:50.945 --> 00:11:53.965
Second, you multiply that by revenues divided
218
00:11:54.065 --> 00:11:55.125
by capital employed.
219
00:11:55.595 --> 00:11:56.965
It's the assets productivity
220
00:11:57.465 --> 00:11:59.085
and it's name the assets turnover.
221
00:12:00.065 --> 00:12:02.605
The return on sales is more than 50%
222
00:12:02.905 --> 00:12:04.285
during the last two years.
223
00:12:04.745 --> 00:12:07.085
The company is very profitable as far as the p
224
00:12:07.085 --> 00:12:10.525
and l is concerned, but the airport is very capital
225
00:12:11.075 --> 00:12:12.525
intensive infrastructure,
226
00:12:12.545 --> 00:12:17.085
and this is why the assets turnover is 0.53
227
00:12:17.225 --> 00:12:18.285
in 2023.
228
00:12:18.945 --> 00:12:22.205
Of course, it's significantly up from 2022.
229
00:12:22.905 --> 00:12:24.125
For very simple reason,
230
00:12:24.225 --> 00:12:27.085
the capital employed is a little bit less.
231
00:12:27.175 --> 00:12:29.925
Under revenues are very much up
232
00:12:30.795 --> 00:12:33.605
from point 35 to point 53.
233
00:12:33.605 --> 00:12:36.405
There is a dramatic increase in the assets productivity
234
00:12:36.905 --> 00:12:40.765
and it shows in the rose A, which moves up from 18%
235
00:12:40.985 --> 00:12:42.445
to 29%.
236
00:12:43.265 --> 00:12:46.565
So the financial performance is absolutely strong,
237
00:12:47.225 --> 00:12:48.645
but the financial profitability
238
00:12:48.825 --> 00:12:52.445
for the shareholders is even higher for a couple of reasons.
239
00:12:52.445 --> 00:12:54.085
Further, rose is up
240
00:12:54.385 --> 00:12:57.285
and the rose is absolutely fundamental in the calculation
241
00:12:57.285 --> 00:12:58.325
of the return equity,
242
00:12:58.945 --> 00:13:02.285
but the return equity using the leverage formula is return
243
00:13:02.285 --> 00:13:03.925
capital plus the leverage effect.
244
00:13:04.585 --> 00:13:08.325
And the leverage effect is a rose minus interest multiplied
245
00:13:08.325 --> 00:13:12.365
by the gearing as rose is much more than the interest rate.
246
00:13:12.505 --> 00:13:16.325
And as the gearing is moving from 0.4 to 1.3,
247
00:13:16.625 --> 00:13:18.925
the return on equity as a consequence is going
248
00:13:18.925 --> 00:13:22.965
to move up from 17% to 47%,
249
00:13:23.215 --> 00:13:25.925
which is a dramatic increase, uh,
250
00:13:26.005 --> 00:13:27.405
to the benefit of the shareholders.
251
00:13:30.745 --> 00:13:33.045
Now, let's draw a few financial conclusions
252
00:13:33.045 --> 00:13:34.245
from these analysis.
253
00:13:35.135 --> 00:13:39.845
Again, EBITDA is absolutely stratospheric 400 million.
254
00:13:39.985 --> 00:13:43.765
It pays eight times the capital expenditures
255
00:13:44.815 --> 00:13:46.165
CapEx is 50 million.
256
00:13:46.475 --> 00:13:48.965
It's a bit less than depreciation or monetization.
257
00:13:49.365 --> 00:13:50.925
Depreciation is a consequence
258
00:13:50.925 --> 00:13:53.165
of investment in the past when you were building the
259
00:13:53.445 --> 00:13:57.085
capacity and now CapEx is probably more about
260
00:13:57.085 --> 00:13:58.525
maintenance and productivity.
261
00:13:59.725 --> 00:14:01.225
Now with the ebitda, you have
262
00:14:01.225 --> 00:14:02.785
to find on the capital expenditures,
263
00:14:02.785 --> 00:14:05.825
but you also have to finance a working capital requirement.
264
00:14:06.725 --> 00:14:09.265
The good news is that the working capital requirement is
265
00:14:09.905 --> 00:14:12.225
negative, and then as a consequence,
266
00:14:12.295 --> 00:14:13.865
when revenues are growing,
267
00:14:14.445 --> 00:14:17.785
the working capital requirement in absolute terms is up.
268
00:14:18.245 --> 00:14:22.225
But as it is negative, it's not a consumption of funds,
269
00:14:22.255 --> 00:14:25.065
it's not the use of funds, it is a source of funds.
270
00:14:25.815 --> 00:14:29.625
This is why as a con, the free cash flow is extremely
271
00:14:30.225 --> 00:14:31.305
strongly positive.
272
00:14:31.935 --> 00:14:34.065
When your free cash flow is strongly positive,
273
00:14:34.125 --> 00:14:35.905
you can return the cash to share orders.
274
00:14:36.715 --> 00:14:38.225
Today it's about dividends
275
00:14:38.845 --> 00:14:40.385
and tomorrow it's going
276
00:14:40.385 --> 00:14:42.745
to be probably about shares buybacks.
277
00:14:45.585 --> 00:14:49.445
In addition to the financial analysis of the Athens Airport,
278
00:14:49.755 --> 00:14:52.685
it's interesting to make a kind of competitive benchmark.
279
00:14:53.505 --> 00:14:56.685
We can compare Athens with Paris Jewish,
280
00:14:56.945 --> 00:15:01.285
and Frankfurt Return equity is very high for Athens
281
00:15:02.195 --> 00:15:03.265
47%.
282
00:15:03.925 --> 00:15:07.545
As far as the other three are concerned, it's about 15
283
00:15:07.605 --> 00:15:10.585
for Paris, 11 for the Swiss airport,
284
00:15:10.925 --> 00:15:12.865
and 10 for the German airport.
285
00:15:13.765 --> 00:15:16.505
As a financial profitability is extremely strong.
286
00:15:16.525 --> 00:15:19.945
The price to book is going to be extremely positive.
287
00:15:20.415 --> 00:15:23.625
It's 3.7. The price to book is calculated
288
00:15:23.625 --> 00:15:27.225
by dividing the market capitalization by the book equity.
289
00:15:28.015 --> 00:15:32.265
When it is 3.7, it simply means that one Euro invested
290
00:15:32.265 --> 00:15:36.665
by shareholders has been transformed into 3.7 euros
291
00:15:36.665 --> 00:15:38.305
of market cap of value.
292
00:15:38.855 --> 00:15:40.505
This is strong value creation.
293
00:15:41.745 --> 00:15:43.185
Interestingly, in Paris,
294
00:15:43.605 --> 00:15:45.745
the return equity is significantly less,
295
00:15:46.205 --> 00:15:48.945
but the market to book is still 2.9.
296
00:15:49.805 --> 00:15:54.705
In Zurich, it's 2.1, and in Fvu it's hardly more than one.
297
00:15:55.965 --> 00:15:59.185
The enterprise value divided by the sales
298
00:15:59.245 --> 00:16:03.145
and revenues is six years of revenues for Evans four,
299
00:16:03.215 --> 00:16:05.905
four Paris, almost six for Zurich,
300
00:16:06.005 --> 00:16:08.905
and 0.6 for Frankfort.
301
00:16:09.405 --> 00:16:12.465
But there's a very interesting multiple in which you have a
302
00:16:12.465 --> 00:16:14.545
combination of the performance
303
00:16:15.045 --> 00:16:16.705
and the growth expectations,
304
00:16:16.705 --> 00:16:19.505
which is enterprise value divided by ebitda.
305
00:16:20.325 --> 00:16:21.625
The enterprise value,
306
00:16:21.715 --> 00:16:24.905
which you remember is market capitalization plus net
307
00:16:24.905 --> 00:16:28.225
financial debts is seven years of EBITDA for assets
308
00:16:28.645 --> 00:16:30.385
and almost 10 years for Paris,
309
00:16:30.945 --> 00:16:32.705
a bit more than 10 years for Zurich.
310
00:16:33.485 --> 00:16:37.105
So basically the market anticipates strong growths for Paris
311
00:16:37.245 --> 00:16:39.945
and Zurich and not so much for assets.
312
00:16:40.515 --> 00:16:45.065
Enterprise value on EBITDA for Frankfurt is 1.8,
313
00:16:45.435 --> 00:16:47.785
which basically means that the shareholders are
314
00:16:47.845 --> 00:16:50.905
as well treated as the customers in this airport.
315
00:16:51.845 --> 00:16:55.145
As you compare the size of these airports,
316
00:16:55.875 --> 00:17:00.265
atens is not very big one, 2.6 billion market cap
317
00:17:00.775 --> 00:17:03.665
when it's 12 for Paris 6 4 0,
318
00:17:04.165 --> 00:17:06.265
and about five four Frankfurt.
319
00:17:09.165 --> 00:17:12.665
Now, let's go back to the recent listing of the airport.
320
00:17:13.645 --> 00:17:17.185
You remember that the EBITDA is financing growth,
321
00:17:17.605 --> 00:17:19.745
is financing capital expenditures,
322
00:17:20.165 --> 00:17:21.425
and does not need to finance
323
00:17:21.945 --> 00:17:23.745
a negative working capital requirement.
324
00:17:23.765 --> 00:17:25.745
So basically the objective
325
00:17:25.745 --> 00:17:28.585
of the IPO is not funding for growth.
326
00:17:29.725 --> 00:17:31.065
You don't need a penny,
327
00:17:31.645 --> 00:17:33.785
but basically there's commitment which is
328
00:17:33.785 --> 00:17:34.945
about privatization.
329
00:17:35.765 --> 00:17:38.785
As a consequence, the IPO is going to be run
330
00:17:38.785 --> 00:17:40.585
with sale of shares.
331
00:17:41.235 --> 00:17:43.625
There was a privatization commitment
332
00:17:44.165 --> 00:17:47.425
and it's going to be realized by the state.
333
00:17:48.085 --> 00:17:51.605
As a consequence, there will be changes in the shareholding
334
00:17:51.805 --> 00:17:55.005
structure because the privatization fund
335
00:17:55.525 --> 00:18:00.045
H-R-A-D-F is going to sell the 30%
336
00:18:00.145 --> 00:18:01.725
of shares it's holding.
337
00:18:02.145 --> 00:18:04.085
Who is going to buy the shares?
338
00:18:06.245 --> 00:18:08.325
I already mentioned the shareholder structure
339
00:18:09.225 --> 00:18:11.885
before the IPO AVI Alliance.
340
00:18:12.425 --> 00:18:15.925
So PSP investment holds 40%
341
00:18:15.945 --> 00:18:17.525
of the shares plus 60.
342
00:18:18.665 --> 00:18:22.845
The privatization fund holds 30% of the shares, right?
343
00:18:22.845 --> 00:18:24.365
It's going to be transformed to zero.
344
00:18:25.825 --> 00:18:30.365
The state is 25% and will remain 25%.
345
00:18:30.665 --> 00:18:34.845
The family, the copay Zulus family holds 5%
346
00:18:34.845 --> 00:18:39.445
of the shares minus something public, nothing before,
347
00:18:39.905 --> 00:18:44.165
but the public is going to hold 19% of the shares
348
00:18:44.455 --> 00:18:45.845
after the IPO.
349
00:18:46.825 --> 00:18:48.045
No change again.
350
00:18:48.305 --> 00:18:51.405
For the Greece country family,
351
00:18:51.895 --> 00:18:54.965
Coors will move from five minus to six minus,
352
00:18:55.905 --> 00:18:59.365
and in fact, as the alliance is going to reinforce its
353
00:19:00.005 --> 00:19:03.845
contribution to the equity from 40% plus 60 shares
354
00:19:04.585 --> 00:19:06.685
to 15% plus 60 shares.
355
00:19:07.065 --> 00:19:11.685
So PSP is going to actually take the control of the airport.
356
00:19:13.955 --> 00:19:15.805
What is the interesting impact
357
00:19:16.305 --> 00:19:19.085
of this controlling interest held by PSP?
358
00:19:19.795 --> 00:19:23.325
Imagine you are a retired Canadian civil servant
359
00:19:23.505 --> 00:19:25.565
and you want to travel to Greece in
360
00:19:25.565 --> 00:19:27.645
winter instead of Florida.
361
00:19:28.625 --> 00:19:29.965
Of course, you buy a ticket
362
00:19:30.545 --> 00:19:33.125
and in the airfare there are fees paid
363
00:19:33.185 --> 00:19:34.925
by the airline to the airport.
364
00:19:35.985 --> 00:19:38.925
The fees, it's about revenues for the airport,
365
00:19:39.035 --> 00:19:41.725
it's about profit, and then it's about dividends.
366
00:19:42.525 --> 00:19:44.485
Dividends are going to be paid to shareholders
367
00:19:44.785 --> 00:19:48.645
and 50% of the dividends are going to go back to PSP.
368
00:19:49.425 --> 00:19:53.405
As a consequence of PSP cashing in the revenues from the
369
00:19:53.525 --> 00:19:55.645
dividend, PSP is going to be able to pay the pension
370
00:19:55.945 --> 00:19:57.005
to the retiree.
371
00:19:57.465 --> 00:20:02.205
So here you are observing the perfect example of a circular
372
00:20:02.915 --> 00:20:04.085
financial economy.
373
00:20:06.425 --> 00:20:08.845
Now, as you want to be a little bit more serious,
374
00:20:09.505 --> 00:20:12.405
the big question is what is an airport?
375
00:20:13.435 --> 00:20:16.365
Obviously it's a transportation infrastructure.
376
00:20:17.335 --> 00:20:20.525
There are many travelers getting through the airport,
377
00:20:20.585 --> 00:20:22.405
moving from one place to the other,
378
00:20:23.105 --> 00:20:26.725
but while they are waiting for their flight, uh,
379
00:20:26.945 --> 00:20:28.205
you have to make them busy.
380
00:20:28.905 --> 00:20:32.045
You make them busy, uh, making them buy something.
381
00:20:32.065 --> 00:20:35.125
So you transform the airport into a kind of shopping mall.
382
00:20:36.225 --> 00:20:37.325
If you look at the p
383
00:20:37.325 --> 00:20:41.405
and l of Athens International Airport in 2023, you observe
384
00:20:41.475 --> 00:20:46.205
that the aeronautical assets, the activity is going
385
00:20:46.205 --> 00:20:49.125
to generate 460 something million euros
386
00:20:49.715 --> 00:20:52.925
with an EBIT D rate of 62%.
387
00:20:53.305 --> 00:20:55.405
So again, the p and l is strong,
388
00:20:55.945 --> 00:20:59.325
but assets are quite capital intensive
389
00:20:59.585 --> 00:21:01.325
and you have to pay for the investment.
390
00:21:01.385 --> 00:21:03.245
You remember the assets, turnover is low.
391
00:21:04.395 --> 00:21:09.205
Then in addition to that, there are about 140 million euros
392
00:21:09.265 --> 00:21:14.005
of non-iron revenues, the shopping mall,
393
00:21:14.005 --> 00:21:17.765
plus a number of additional services to the customer.
394
00:21:18.305 --> 00:21:19.765
And now if you look at the p and l
395
00:21:19.765 --> 00:21:24.165
and the A, b, D to revenue ratio, it's more than 80%.
396
00:21:24.985 --> 00:21:29.005
But in addition to that, not only is a premium very strong,
397
00:21:29.345 --> 00:21:31.085
but it is an asset like business.
398
00:21:31.085 --> 00:21:33.125
You have to provide square meters.
399
00:21:33.585 --> 00:21:36.965
You don't have to provide very heavy equipment
400
00:21:37.065 --> 00:21:39.445
for the aeronautical activity.
401
00:21:43.025 --> 00:21:45.325
Now, in addition to these financial characteristics,
402
00:21:45.335 --> 00:21:48.205
there are some economic characteristics of an airport.
403
00:21:48.795 --> 00:21:50.845
It's a geographical monopoly.
404
00:21:51.505 --> 00:21:54.965
You don't build an additional airport next door just
405
00:21:54.985 --> 00:21:57.125
to put these two airports in competition.
406
00:21:57.505 --> 00:22:01.525
Now, it's a monopoly local and it's about transportation
407
00:22:02.505 --> 00:22:06.445
and transport is an absolutely fundamental element in the
408
00:22:06.635 --> 00:22:08.245
development of territories.
409
00:22:08.385 --> 00:22:10.405
If you want to open up a territory,
410
00:22:10.745 --> 00:22:13.205
you create some transportation infrastructure.
411
00:22:13.905 --> 00:22:17.125
So that business can be developed. Now is the cost.
412
00:22:17.665 --> 00:22:20.165
So transportation costs are too high.
413
00:22:20.635 --> 00:22:23.365
It's going to penalize the territorial competitiveness.
414
00:22:23.995 --> 00:22:27.765
It's going to penalize local economic development.
415
00:22:28.945 --> 00:22:33.125
We all know that ESG has completely changed our lives,
416
00:22:33.555 --> 00:22:35.605
private and professional lives.
417
00:22:35.955 --> 00:22:38.525
There's a concept which is linked with ESG,
418
00:22:38.525 --> 00:22:40.325
which is double materiality.
419
00:22:41.625 --> 00:22:46.325
The single maturity is very much analyzing the impact of
420
00:22:46.995 --> 00:22:49.805
outside on inside, the impact
421
00:22:49.805 --> 00:22:53.125
of the environment at large on how the business is running.
422
00:22:53.385 --> 00:22:57.845
But now the second materiality is about what is the impact
423
00:22:57.905 --> 00:23:01.005
of our business through the environment at large,
424
00:23:01.475 --> 00:23:04.365
environment society, climate change,
425
00:23:05.005 --> 00:23:06.565
economic development, and so on.
426
00:23:07.145 --> 00:23:10.405
Of course, if the transportation costs are too high,
427
00:23:10.575 --> 00:23:14.805
there will be a strong negative impact as far as
428
00:23:15.385 --> 00:23:17.685
as of ESG is concerned.
429
00:23:20.625 --> 00:23:23.405
Now, we can get to the critical question of this wi cast.
430
00:23:23.945 --> 00:23:26.605
Should an airport be public or private?
431
00:23:27.665 --> 00:23:29.965
If it's a private asset, it's financed by investors,
432
00:23:30.085 --> 00:23:33.165
shareholders and bankers, which kind
433
00:23:33.165 --> 00:23:34.445
of return as they expect.
434
00:23:34.665 --> 00:23:37.045
The wac, the weighted average cost of capital,
435
00:23:37.815 --> 00:23:40.325
which is basically the return, which is expected
436
00:23:40.425 --> 00:23:42.685
by shareholders and bankers per ratta
437
00:23:42.685 --> 00:23:45.405
as a respective investment in the financing of the asset.
438
00:23:46.865 --> 00:23:49.765
As far as an airport is concerned today,
439
00:23:49.765 --> 00:23:54.725
the WAC is approximately 7%, taking into account the risk
440
00:23:55.065 --> 00:23:57.605
of the airport and the level of interest rate.
441
00:23:57.865 --> 00:24:01.245
Now, the return capital should be greater than 7%.
442
00:24:02.225 --> 00:24:05.845
If it's a public asset, the work is going to be much lower
443
00:24:05.845 --> 00:24:10.405
because it's about sovereign financing, probably
444
00:24:10.905 --> 00:24:12.125
around 3%.
445
00:24:12.825 --> 00:24:16.085
You understand that if the rose should be more than 3%
446
00:24:16.465 --> 00:24:20.805
or more than 7%, it completely changes the picture in terms
447
00:24:20.805 --> 00:24:22.645
of fees paid by the airlines
448
00:24:23.115 --> 00:24:26.685
because the rose is basically the fees you are going
449
00:24:26.685 --> 00:24:28.125
to collect from the airlines,
450
00:24:28.515 --> 00:24:31.685
plus some additional royalties you get out of the stores.
451
00:24:32.955 --> 00:24:34.405
Then there's an alternative.
452
00:24:35.225 --> 00:24:39.445
If you want to promote public territorial development,
453
00:24:40.195 --> 00:24:44.685
then the airport should be public state owed.
454
00:24:45.345 --> 00:24:48.925
If you want to maximize the cash you are going to get out
455
00:24:48.945 --> 00:24:51.365
of this asset, then you're privatized.
456
00:24:52.185 --> 00:24:55.365
If you want to repay the sovereign debt,
457
00:24:55.675 --> 00:24:57.525
then the asset is going to be private.
458
00:24:57.625 --> 00:25:02.085
But if you want to maximize the cash you're going to get out
459
00:25:02.105 --> 00:25:06.525
of this private asset, it might be at the expense
460
00:25:07.305 --> 00:25:10.925
of the territorial local economic development.
461
00:25:13.675 --> 00:25:17.965
When they were young, all economists studied at the
462
00:25:17.965 --> 00:25:22.805
university, the Wealth of Nations, a book published
463
00:25:22.905 --> 00:25:26.405
by Adam Smith in 1776.
464
00:25:27.805 --> 00:25:31.505
Of course, a number of people mentioned the invisible hand,
465
00:25:32.155 --> 00:25:35.705
which basically says that if you are a baker, you have
466
00:25:35.825 --> 00:25:38.505
to be free in the way you run your business.
467
00:25:38.965 --> 00:25:40.905
Let the baker work in order
468
00:25:40.965 --> 00:25:43.065
to maximize the quality of the bread.
469
00:25:43.965 --> 00:25:48.225
And it's very often mentioned as a way to legitimate a
470
00:25:48.865 --> 00:25:51.625
complete freedom in the way businesses manage.
471
00:25:52.365 --> 00:25:53.425
It has to be known
472
00:25:53.425 --> 00:25:56.785
that invisible hand represents something like 10 lines
473
00:25:57.365 --> 00:25:59.145
in the book, but Adam,
474
00:25:59.145 --> 00:26:02.185
Adam Smith insists very much in also saying
475
00:26:02.185 --> 00:26:07.105
that the state is in charge of traditional sovereign
476
00:26:07.625 --> 00:26:11.945
functions, justice, police, army, national defense.
477
00:26:12.525 --> 00:26:15.425
But Adam, Adam Smith insists on the fact that
478
00:26:16.005 --> 00:26:19.425
the state is in charge of allowing people to have access
479
00:26:19.445 --> 00:26:23.585
to health, to education, and to infrastructure.
480
00:26:24.525 --> 00:26:27.745
And this is an absolutely fundamental point when you
481
00:26:28.065 --> 00:26:29.545
consider privatizing
482
00:26:30.245 --> 00:26:32.745
or keeping public an airport,
483
00:26:35.835 --> 00:26:40.105
which decisions have been taken by geographical areas, by
484
00:26:40.665 --> 00:26:43.845
countries, by nations, about privatization or not.
485
00:26:44.855 --> 00:26:48.005
Let's first have a look at private airports.
486
00:26:48.025 --> 00:26:51.525
Listed or not, it's about the case in Europe, mostly
487
00:26:52.505 --> 00:26:54.405
United Kingdom, the airport
488
00:26:54.465 --> 00:26:58.605
of e Israel is fully completely private Asian airport.
489
00:26:59.035 --> 00:27:02.485
Same story. What about public airports?
490
00:27:02.625 --> 00:27:07.285
United States, another Anglo-Saxon strong economic power.
491
00:27:08.065 --> 00:27:11.085
Uh, it's considered that, uh, the airport should be public,
492
00:27:11.225 --> 00:27:12.965
and there is no discussion about that
493
00:27:13.675 --> 00:27:16.605
same story in Middle East and in most freaking countries.
494
00:27:17.865 --> 00:27:22.125
Now, the question is what is the argument in favor
495
00:27:22.345 --> 00:27:24.565
of public versus private?
496
00:27:25.715 --> 00:27:28.085
Some advocates of private say, oh,
497
00:27:28.085 --> 00:27:29.805
there is a productivity gap.
498
00:27:30.545 --> 00:27:32.885
The private airports are much more productive than
499
00:27:32.885 --> 00:27:34.005
the public airports.
500
00:27:34.545 --> 00:27:37.645
But there are some other studies which tend to demonstrate
501
00:27:37.645 --> 00:27:39.565
that it's absolutely not true.
502
00:27:40.665 --> 00:27:44.485
And in addition to that, let's imagine that you analyze
503
00:27:44.745 --> 00:27:47.925
and produce a correlation, which basically says
504
00:27:47.925 --> 00:27:50.605
that private airports are more productive
505
00:27:50.605 --> 00:27:51.885
than public airports.
506
00:27:52.435 --> 00:27:54.045
It's not a demonstration at all
507
00:27:54.595 --> 00:27:57.125
because you can say that it's
508
00:27:57.205 --> 00:27:59.365
because they are private, that they're more productive,
509
00:27:59.825 --> 00:28:01.045
or it's
510
00:28:01.045 --> 00:28:02.405
because they're more productive,
511
00:28:02.675 --> 00:28:04.485
that you can privatize them.
512
00:28:05.225 --> 00:28:07.245
So basically it's a correlation.
513
00:28:07.855 --> 00:28:11.525
Maybe it is certainly not a causal relationship.
514
00:28:14.945 --> 00:28:16.805
As a conclusion of this vidcast,
515
00:28:17.385 --> 00:28:19.405
we have observed the listing of an airport,
516
00:28:20.175 --> 00:28:23.125
successful operation, nicely executed.
517
00:28:24.065 --> 00:28:28.005
But as far as the question, should an airport be public
518
00:28:28.385 --> 00:28:31.885
or private is concerned, the debate is absolutely
519
00:28:32.145 --> 00:28:33.525
and fully open.
520
00:28:34.705 --> 00:28:35.495
Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast which will give us the opportunity to analyze and observe the different statuses that an asset can take private asset versus public asset.
And we are going to use the example of the recent listing of the International Airport of Athens In Greece before the listing there was a price range for the stock price and the price range was ranging from pessimistic to optimistic, from seven euros to 8.2 euros per share.
At the end of the day, the price which was decided was 8.2, the upper side of the range, and quite quickly the stock price went too high of 9.6 euros because investors were quite enthusiastic about the offer.
Today, March 13, when I record this with the stock price is about 8.7 euros.
The market has been quite stable throughout the months and so at the end of the day it was a right price.
Today market capitalization of a i A is 2.6 billion euros.
The demand from the investors was 8.6 billion euros, which gives you an idea about the enthusiasm of the investors in the listing.
Now a few dates to observe the chronology.
The first date is 2001.
It's the opening of the airport, the integration of the airport, a left areas vene, which was given as a name to the airport because of a very famous political person in Greece.
The first plane which landed in Akins was coming from Montreal.
The reason why a new airport was built by Greece is the Olympic Games, which took place in 2004.
There was an urgent need for a new efficient and modern airport, but very often when you build such a very expensive construction, you use a public private partnership.
So basically there will be a number of investors contributing to the construction, the operations throughout a concession who's going to be in charge, a very well known German captain, and in a construction business whose name is tif and TIF is going to start running a business about running airports.
TIF F Airport is going to be created in 1997, uh, taking the opportunity of the airport of Athens.
At the end of the day, you create a special purpose vehicle, a company which is going to run throughout the concession.
HTI Airport holds 40% of the shares plus 60 shares, so a little bit more than 40%, which is going to be absolutely crucial.
I will explain you why in a few minutes.
The Greek state keeps retains 55% of the shares and then is controlling the airport.
A family known in Greece to be, uh, quite involved in concession and construction to cop's.
Family is going to hold 5%, a little bit less than 5% of the shares, so 5% minus 60 shares, so plus 60 for TIF and minus 60 for the family.
Again, it's going to be quite a, as you all know, in 2009 there will be the explosion of the subprime crisis.
So it's going to be an economic and financial crisis for the whole planet and probably more for Greece because there will be some problems which are going to be discovered in sovereign debt.
As a consequence, a country is going to take commitments, is going to create a privatization fund.
You have to sell assets just to be able to reduce the amount of indebtedness in the country.
The Hellenic Corporation of Assets and Participation is a financial holding in which they are most of the assets owned by the state.
HCAP owns 55% of the airport at the very beginning.
This is what I was explaining, but today the fund owns only 25% directly in the airport because 30% of the shares were put in a fund, which was a dedicated privatization fund whose name is Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund.
In parallel, something happens, which is quite important in Canada, it's a creation of PSP investment.
It's a Canadian public sector pension investment board.
Basically, this pension fund is in charge of managing the pension of a number of people coming from the public sector.
And today as a total assets managed by the fund are about 250 to 300 billion Canadian dollars.
So it's absolutely not negligible.
In 2030 PSP is acquiring four teeth airport GA and Beha because it's a German company, very often this kind of pension fund is investing in infrastructure because it's about long term concessions and reasonably predictable cash flows.
HTI Airport is going to be renamed AVI Alliance and it's still headquartered in d***o.
It's a German company according to Z Low.
Now the company is running the airport in Athens, Greece, but also Germany, Hungary, Albania, Australia and Puerto Rico.
So it's quite diversified infrastructure fund.
Today if we go back to Greece, of course a country has been hit by the subprime crisis and the sovereign debt problems.
Financial consolidation is needed prioritizations, but as far as air transportation is concerned, the planet was hit by COVID-19.
Traffic went down by 60% in Athens for domestic flights and about 90% for international flights.
Now the Covid is obviously a bit behind us and domestic flights are back to normal, almost international flights, not quite some, but basically it's getting better and better.
Now there are some other good news as far as Greece is concerned.
As a consequence of the crisis, the company sovereign debt was speculative grade BB plus in October, 2023, standard and pools decided to be a little bit more positive about Greece and move the rating from BB plus to triple B minus, and this one notch of transformed the country from speculative to investment grade feature followed in December, 2023 from BB plus two, triple B minus in the country.
Tourism is absolutely fundamental.
It represents 18% of GDP and it employs 900,000 people, which is about 20% of the total employed people in Greece.
So that's absolutely phenomenal.
Athens plays a huge role because it welcomes 35% of foreign visitors and the extremely good news about the airport is that it is a real cash machine.
Let's first have a look at the p and l financial metrics of the airport.
The revenues generated by the airport in 2023 are about 600 million, uh, by 27% against 2022.
2022 was up by 25% against 2021, but it is the consequence of the recovery from Covid increase in the traffic.
Now the EBITDA is absolutely great, 400 million, which represents 67% to revenues.
It was 69% in 2022, but it's a strong p and l strong performance as far as the return on sales is concerned and it is transforming to a high return on sales as far as EBIT is concerned, 54% in 20 23, 50 2% in 2022.
So the p and a is quite strong earning earnings per share.
The bottom line is going to show some nice progresses.
The earnings per share in 2023 are earned by 37% against 2022.
Well, the p and l is strong, but the p and l is not the p and l is about the return on sales, but it's not about the financial performance as a company.
The financial performance is represented by the ability of the company to generate a return on capital, which is more than the weighted average cost of capital, the return which is expected by investors to remunerate risk.
Now you have to calculate the capital employed.
It was 1.1 in 2023 and about 1.4 in 2022.
So there is a kind of asset management in order to reduce the capital employed.
Now when the capital employee is down and in the meantime the revenues are up, you understand that the assets productivity is going to be very significantly up.
We are going to discuss that in a minute, but what is also very important to understand is the evolution of the financial structure of the financial strategy of the company in 2022, the 1.4 or more or less, 1 billion in equity and 400 million in debt.
Then the gearing debt over equity is about 0.4.
As a consequence of strong dividend payments, the equity is down to half a billion in 2023 and it's about 600 million of net financial debt.
Then the gearing is 1.32.
The airport, the company decided to leverage the business paying a huge amount of dividend.
The dividend which was paid in 2022 is 200 million in twenty twenty three, five hundred and fifty 5 million.
And when you look at the balance sheet at the end of 2023, you observe dividend payable of an additional 130 million euros.
This is quite a huge amount of money and it is a financial strategy of the company.
Now, does it put the company at risk or not? This is another question, but as far as cash flows are concerned, the question is can you finance growth? And the answer is, well, capital expenditures represent about 50 million in 2022 and 2023.
The EBITDA you remember is 400 million, though EBITDA is eight times CapEx as far as the free cash was concerned, there is absolutely no problem.
Basically, there are two ways to calculate the return capital employee.
The first one is to directly divide the EBIT by the cap employee.
The second way is to remember the deploy in the more formula, which say that first you divide EBIT by sales, by revenues, and you get the return on sales.
Second, you multiply that by revenues divided by capital employed.
It's the assets productivity and it's name the assets turnover.
The return on sales is more than 50% during the last two years.
The company is very profitable as far as the p and l is concerned, but the airport is very capital intensive infrastructure, and this is why the assets turnover is 0.53 in 2023.
Of course, it's significantly up from 2022.
For very simple reason, the capital employed is a little bit less.
Under revenues are very much up from point 35 to point 53.
There is a dramatic increase in the assets productivity and it shows in the rose A, which moves up from 18% to 29%.
So the financial performance is absolutely strong, but the financial profitability for the shareholders is even higher for a couple of reasons.
Further, rose is up and the rose is absolutely fundamental in the calculation of the return equity, but the return equity using the leverage formula is return capital plus the leverage effect.
And the leverage effect is a rose minus interest multiplied by the gearing as rose is much more than the interest rate.
And as the gearing is moving from 0.4 to 1.3, the return on equity as a consequence is going to move up from 17% to 47%, which is a dramatic increase, uh, to the benefit of the shareholders.
Now, let's draw a few financial conclusions from these analysis.
Again, EBITDA is absolutely stratospheric 400 million.
It pays eight times the capital expenditures CapEx is 50 million.
It's a bit less than depreciation or monetization.
Depreciation is a consequence of investment in the past when you were building the capacity and now CapEx is probably more about maintenance and productivity.
Now with the ebitda, you have to find on the capital expenditures, but you also have to finance a working capital requirement.
The good news is that the working capital requirement is negative, and then as a consequence, when revenues are growing, the working capital requirement in absolute terms is up.
But as it is negative, it's not a consumption of funds, it's not the use of funds, it is a source of funds.
This is why as a con, the free cash flow is extremely strongly positive.
When your free cash flow is strongly positive, you can return the cash to share orders.
Today it's about dividends and tomorrow it's going to be probably about shares buybacks.
In addition to the financial analysis of the Athens Airport, it's interesting to make a kind of competitive benchmark.
We can compare Athens with Paris Jewish, and Frankfurt Return equity is very high for Athens 47%.
As far as the other three are concerned, it's about 15 for Paris, 11 for the Swiss airport, and 10 for the German airport.
As a financial profitability is extremely strong.
The price to book is going to be extremely positive.
It's 3.7.
The price to book is calculated by dividing the market capitalization by the book equity.
When it is 3.7, it simply means that one Euro invested by shareholders has been transformed into 3.7 euros of market cap of value.
This is strong value creation.
Interestingly, in Paris, the return equity is significantly less, but the market to book is still 2.9.
In Zurich, it's 2.1, and in Fvu it's hardly more than one.
The enterprise value divided by the sales and revenues is six years of revenues for Evans four, four Paris, almost six for Zurich, and 0.6 for Frankfort.
But there's a very interesting multiple in which you have a combination of the performance and the growth expectations, which is enterprise value divided by ebitda.
The enterprise value, which you remember is market capitalization plus net financial debts is seven years of EBITDA for assets and almost 10 years for Paris, a bit more than 10 years for Zurich.
So basically the market anticipates strong growths for Paris and Zurich and not so much for assets.
Enterprise value on EBITDA for Frankfurt is 1.8, which basically means that the shareholders are as well treated as the customers in this airport.
As you compare the size of these airports, atens is not very big one, 2.6 billion market cap when it's 12 for Paris 6 4 0, and about five four Frankfurt.
Now, let's go back to the recent listing of the airport.
You remember that the EBITDA is financing growth, is financing capital expenditures, and does not need to finance a negative working capital requirement.
So basically the objective of the IPO is not funding for growth.
You don't need a penny, but basically there's commitment which is about privatization.
As a consequence, the IPO is going to be run with sale of shares.
There was a privatization commitment and it's going to be realized by the state.
As a consequence, there will be changes in the shareholding structure because the privatization fund H-R-A-D-F is going to sell the 30% of shares it's holding.
Who is going to buy the shares? I already mentioned the shareholder structure before the IPO AVI Alliance.
So PSP investment holds 40% of the shares plus 60.
The privatization fund holds 30% of the shares, right? It's going to be transformed to zero.
The state is 25% and will remain 25%.
The family, the copay Zulus family holds 5% of the shares minus something public, nothing before, but the public is going to hold 19% of the shares after the IPO.
No change again.
For the Greece country family, Coors will move from five minus to six minus, and in fact, as the alliance is going to reinforce its contribution to the equity from 40% plus 60 shares to 15% plus 60 shares.
So PSP is going to actually take the control of the airport.
What is the interesting impact of this controlling interest held by PSP? Imagine you are a retired Canadian civil servant and you want to travel to Greece in winter instead of Florida.
Of course, you buy a ticket and in the airfare there are fees paid by the airline to the airport.
The fees, it's about revenues for the airport, it's about profit, and then it's about dividends.
Dividends are going to be paid to shareholders and 50% of the dividends are going to go back to PSP.
As a consequence of PSP cashing in the revenues from the dividend, PSP is going to be able to pay the pension to the retiree.
So here you are observing the perfect example of a circular financial economy.
Now, as you want to be a little bit more serious, the big question is what is an airport? Obviously it's a transportation infrastructure.
There are many travelers getting through the airport, moving from one place to the other, but while they are waiting for their flight, uh, you have to make them busy.
You make them busy, uh, making them buy something.
So you transform the airport into a kind of shopping mall.
If you look at the p and l of Athens International Airport in 2023, you observe that the aeronautical assets, the activity is going to generate 460 something million euros with an EBIT D rate of 62%.
So again, the p and l is strong, but assets are quite capital intensive and you have to pay for the investment.
You remember the assets, turnover is low.
Then in addition to that, there are about 140 million euros of non-iron revenues, the shopping mall, plus a number of additional services to the customer.
And now if you look at the p and l and the A, b, D to revenue ratio, it's more than 80%.
But in addition to that, not only is a premium very strong, but it is an asset like business.
You have to provide square meters.
You don't have to provide very heavy equipment for the aeronautical activity.
Now, in addition to these financial characteristics, there are some economic characteristics of an airport.
It's a geographical monopoly.
You don't build an additional airport next door just to put these two airports in competition.
Now, it's a monopoly local and it's about transportation and transport is an absolutely fundamental element in the development of territories.
If you want to open up a territory, you create some transportation infrastructure.
So that business can be developed.
Now is the cost.
So transportation costs are too high.
It's going to penalize the territorial competitiveness.
It's going to penalize local economic development.
We all know that ESG has completely changed our lives, private and professional lives.
There's a concept which is linked with ESG, which is double materiality.
The single maturity is very much analyzing the impact of outside on inside, the impact of the environment at large on how the business is running.
But now the second materiality is about what is the impact of our business through the environment at large, environment society, climate change, economic development, and so on.
Of course, if the transportation costs are too high, there will be a strong negative impact as far as as of ESG is concerned.
Now, we can get to the critical question of this wi cast.
Should an airport be public or private? If it's a private asset, it's financed by investors, shareholders and bankers, which kind of return as they expect.
The wac, the weighted average cost of capital, which is basically the return, which is expected by shareholders and bankers per ratta as a respective investment in the financing of the asset.
As far as an airport is concerned today, the WAC is approximately 7%, taking into account the risk of the airport and the level of interest rate.
Now, the return capital should be greater than 7%.
If it's a public asset, the work is going to be much lower because it's about sovereign financing, probably around 3%.
You understand that if the rose should be more than 3% or more than 7%, it completely changes the picture in terms of fees paid by the airlines because the rose is basically the fees you are going to collect from the airlines, plus some additional royalties you get out of the stores.
Then there's an alternative.
If you want to promote public territorial development, then the airport should be public state owed.
If you want to maximize the cash you are going to get out of this asset, then you're privatized.
If you want to repay the sovereign debt, then the asset is going to be private.
But if you want to maximize the cash you're going to get out of this private asset, it might be at the expense of the territorial local economic development.
When they were young, all economists studied at the university, the Wealth of Nations, a book published by Adam Smith in 1776.
Of course, a number of people mentioned the invisible hand, which basically says that if you are a baker, you have to be free in the way you run your business.
Let the baker work in order to maximize the quality of the bread.
And it's very often mentioned as a way to legitimate a complete freedom in the way businesses manage.
It has to be known that invisible hand represents something like 10 lines in the book, but Adam, Adam Smith insists very much in also saying that the state is in charge of traditional sovereign functions, justice, police, army, national defense.
But Adam, Adam Smith insists on the fact that the state is in charge of allowing people to have access to health, to education, and to infrastructure.
And this is an absolutely fundamental point when you consider privatizing or keeping public an airport, which decisions have been taken by geographical areas, by countries, by nations, about privatization or not.
Let's first have a look at private airports.
Listed or not, it's about the case in Europe, mostly United Kingdom, the airport of e Israel is fully completely private Asian airport.
Same story.
What about public airports? United States, another Anglo-Saxon strong economic power.
Uh, it's considered that, uh, the airport should be public, and there is no discussion about that same story in Middle East and in most freaking countries.
Now, the question is what is the argument in favor of public versus private? Some advocates of private say, oh, there is a productivity gap.
The private airports are much more productive than the public airports.
But there are some other studies which tend to demonstrate that it's absolutely not true.
And in addition to that, let's imagine that you analyze and produce a correlation, which basically says that private airports are more productive than public airports.
It's not a demonstration at all because you can say that it's because they are private, that they're more productive, or it's because they're more productive, that you can privatize them.
So basically it's a correlation.
Maybe it is certainly not a causal relationship.
As a conclusion of this vidcast, we have observed the listing of an airport, successful operation, nicely executed.
But as far as the question, should an airport be public or private is concerned, the debate is absolutely and fully open.
Thank you very much.