March 2025 Vidcast // Mixue, Ice Cream and Tea
The King of Honey Snow
Mixue is a Chinese ice cream and iced tea franchise founded in 1997 by Zhang Hongchao in Zhengzhou, Henan province. It has exported to certain foreign markets in South-East Asia (Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, Laos and Thailand) and Oceania (Australia).
Professor Dominique Jacquet provides a financial analysis of this company.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:08.685 --> 00:00:11.315
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast, which is devoted
2
00:00:11.315 --> 00:00:15.115
to a company whose logo is a round snowman.
3
00:00:15.895 --> 00:00:19.795
The snowman has a crown and a head, so it is a king
4
00:00:20.375 --> 00:00:21.795
and a king has a scepter.
5
00:00:21.955 --> 00:00:24.955
A scepter is in the right hand of the snowman
6
00:00:25.255 --> 00:00:26.395
and it's a nice cream.
7
00:00:27.135 --> 00:00:30.715
In fact, this person is a king of Hane snow.
8
00:00:31.105 --> 00:00:32.955
Hane snow is the English translation
9
00:00:33.495 --> 00:00:35.155
of the name of a Chinese company.
10
00:00:35.765 --> 00:00:40.235
Misre. Why talk about mwe?
11
00:00:40.425 --> 00:00:45.195
Because just a few days ago, the 3rd of March, 2025,
12
00:00:45.495 --> 00:00:46.675
the company went public.
13
00:00:47.135 --> 00:00:49.475
It was listed in the Hong Kong stock exchange,
14
00:00:49.825 --> 00:00:52.515
very well known for the Hong San Index
15
00:00:53.095 --> 00:00:54.635
and it was a tremendous success.
16
00:00:55.215 --> 00:01:00.075
The stock price initially was 202.5 Hong Kong
17
00:01:00.075 --> 00:01:02.955
dollars, which is about 28 US dollars.
18
00:01:03.775 --> 00:01:06.755
For the first year of listing, the stock price went up
19
00:01:06.775 --> 00:01:11.355
by 43%, reaching 290 Hong Kong dollars.
20
00:01:11.375 --> 00:01:12.395
At the end of the first day
21
00:01:12.395 --> 00:01:15.275
of listing the market capitalization is then
22
00:01:16.035 --> 00:01:17.155
14 billion US dollars.
23
00:01:17.175 --> 00:01:18.835
So it's quite significant company,
24
00:01:19.535 --> 00:01:22.275
but what is absolutely mind blowing is
25
00:01:22.275 --> 00:01:26.515
that the offer was subscribed 5,258 times.
26
00:01:26.975 --> 00:01:30.195
So the demand was stratospheric against the offer.
27
00:01:30.625 --> 00:01:31.955
It's by the way, quite curious
28
00:01:31.955 --> 00:01:35.755
that the stock price went up only by 43%.
29
00:01:36.575 --> 00:01:39.875
Now, why is the company extremely successful
30
00:01:39.935 --> 00:01:41.755
and highly demanding on stock market?
31
00:01:41.985 --> 00:01:43.755
Because it's a company which is growing,
32
00:01:44.215 --> 00:01:45.635
the revenues are growing
33
00:01:46.295 --> 00:01:49.315
and the growth is not realized at the expense of performance
34
00:01:49.315 --> 00:01:53.395
because in net income, the bottom line represents 16%
35
00:01:53.495 --> 00:01:55.155
of sales of revenues.
36
00:01:55.415 --> 00:01:57.475
So it is a company which is growing
37
00:01:58.055 --> 00:02:01.905
and performing with such metrics.
38
00:02:02.445 --> 00:02:05.665
One could expect that this company is in a AI business,
39
00:02:05.855 --> 00:02:07.905
data centers cloud or whatsoever.
40
00:02:09.145 --> 00:02:13.145
Absolutely not. It is just selling sparkling tea,
41
00:02:13.755 --> 00:02:15.985
refreshing drinks, ice cream,
42
00:02:16.045 --> 00:02:20.665
and at a very, very low price, less than a US D,
43
00:02:21.365 --> 00:02:24.865
closer to one, rein B, the Chinese Yuan.
44
00:02:25.165 --> 00:02:27.265
And we are going to discuss the marketing
45
00:02:27.405 --> 00:02:30.585
and commercial strategy of the company in the next slide.
46
00:02:32.535 --> 00:02:36.725
Definitely the timing of the IPO was absolutely excellent,
47
00:02:36.995 --> 00:02:39.885
extremely favorable stock market conditions.
48
00:02:40.425 --> 00:02:42.685
If you look at the last 12 months of the Hong
49
00:02:43.145 --> 00:02:46.765
and you compare that with a NASDAQ over the first
50
00:02:47.425 --> 00:02:52.045
11 months, the trend was quite the same, more volatility
51
00:02:52.185 --> 00:02:55.605
for the Hong, but basically over 11 months,
52
00:02:56.155 --> 00:03:00.165
both stock prices, stock market index went up by 20%.
53
00:03:00.945 --> 00:03:02.605
But if you look at the last months,
54
00:03:02.985 --> 00:03:07.445
the Hong made an additional 20% when when Nasdaq was down
55
00:03:07.545 --> 00:03:09.445
by about 13%.
56
00:03:10.105 --> 00:03:13.285
So definitely the Hong Kong market is doing quite well.
57
00:03:13.785 --> 00:03:14.925
And in addition to that,
58
00:03:15.135 --> 00:03:19.205
there is another company operating roughly the same industry
59
00:03:19.505 --> 00:03:23.565
as booming, which went public in February.
60
00:03:23.825 --> 00:03:24.965
So quite recently
61
00:03:25.265 --> 00:03:29.765
and since the IPO, the stock price went uh by 23%.
62
00:03:30.145 --> 00:03:32.325
So definitely the market isn't the demand
63
00:03:32.345 --> 00:03:34.165
for this kind of stocks.
64
00:03:36.375 --> 00:03:39.005
Let's go back to the story of mbe.
65
00:03:39.425 --> 00:03:41.885
The company was created in 1997
66
00:03:42.545 --> 00:03:46.925
and during six years the company just failed at opening
67
00:03:47.225 --> 00:03:49.245
stores which were successful.
68
00:03:49.745 --> 00:03:52.085
It was about opening and closing.
69
00:03:52.825 --> 00:03:54.045
In 2003,
70
00:03:54.425 --> 00:03:58.325
the company makes its first successful localization,
71
00:03:58.715 --> 00:04:00.245
then it becomes sustainable.
72
00:04:00.745 --> 00:04:04.845
In 2005, the company is producing its signature product,
73
00:04:05.225 --> 00:04:09.205
the ice cream at one Chinese Yuan one Ren mibi,
74
00:04:09.255 --> 00:04:12.405
which represents 14 US cents.
75
00:04:12.745 --> 00:04:14.045
So it's quite low cost
76
00:04:14.305 --> 00:04:16.245
and it's going to become extremely popular.
77
00:04:17.025 --> 00:04:20.245
Now the day you want to develop your business, you have
78
00:04:20.245 --> 00:04:22.005
to go through franchise.
79
00:04:22.475 --> 00:04:24.765
Franchise is a fantastic lever
80
00:04:25.145 --> 00:04:29.085
for developing sites at the speed of light in 2007,
81
00:04:29.385 --> 00:04:31.565
the start the franchise activity.
82
00:04:32.665 --> 00:04:36.085
Now the question is what do you offer to the franchisees?
83
00:04:36.665 --> 00:04:39.045
The answer is raw materials, which are produced
84
00:04:39.045 --> 00:04:43.805
by the company and in 2012 the company started production
85
00:04:43.805 --> 00:04:46.805
manufacturing facilities in Han in order
86
00:04:46.945 --> 00:04:50.645
to sell raw material for franchisees franchises.
87
00:04:51.505 --> 00:04:56.085
And then the development accelerated In 2020, the number
88
00:04:56.265 --> 00:05:00.205
of stores reaches the outstanding level of 10,000
89
00:05:00.745 --> 00:05:03.165
and the company is opening its first store
90
00:05:03.715 --> 00:05:05.725
outside China in Indonesia.
91
00:05:06.705 --> 00:05:09.725
Now in the 31st of December, 2024,
92
00:05:09.815 --> 00:05:14.205
there are 46,479
93
00:05:14.425 --> 00:05:17.325
stores, which is an outstanding commercial
94
00:05:17.475 --> 00:05:21.265
development an 3rd of March.
95
00:05:21.525 --> 00:05:23.385
So the there's a company is listed,
96
00:05:24.165 --> 00:05:26.345
the Wall Street Journal headline is,
97
00:05:26.885 --> 00:05:28.545
forget about McDonald's,
98
00:05:29.255 --> 00:05:32.745
this Chinese fast food chain is now the world's biggest.
99
00:05:33.365 --> 00:05:37.465
And that's absolutely true in terms of number of sites.
100
00:05:38.245 --> 00:05:40.585
If you look at the evolution of worldwide stores
101
00:05:40.685 --> 00:05:42.785
for a number of companies, mwe,
102
00:05:42.805 --> 00:05:45.945
but competitors such as McDonald's, Starbucks
103
00:05:46.085 --> 00:05:48.785
and Subway, it's absolutely mind blowing.
104
00:05:49.565 --> 00:05:54.065
So basically as far as McDonald's is concerned, from 2019
105
00:05:54.125 --> 00:05:56.625
to 2024, the number of stores
106
00:05:56.685 --> 00:05:59.725
of locations is about less than 40,000 to
107
00:06:00.245 --> 00:06:01.725
a bit more than 40,000.
108
00:06:02.435 --> 00:06:06.725
What about Starbucks from 30 to 40,000, subway
109
00:06:07.315 --> 00:06:12.165
down from 40,000 to 35,000 plus, and what about me?
110
00:06:12.185 --> 00:06:15.205
Way from less than 10,000
111
00:06:15.705 --> 00:06:17.965
to more than 46,000.
112
00:06:18.425 --> 00:06:20.645
So in terms of number of points of sales,
113
00:06:20.995 --> 00:06:22.885
it's absolutely outstanding.
114
00:06:23.545 --> 00:06:27.885
Now forget about McDonald's is simply a journalist punchline
115
00:06:27.885 --> 00:06:30.605
because the rest of the metrics is slightly different.
116
00:06:30.825 --> 00:06:32.845
We are going to look at that in the next slide.
117
00:06:35.305 --> 00:06:37.315
What is a business model of me?
118
00:06:38.315 --> 00:06:40.595
I already mentioned that the company is selling
119
00:06:41.175 --> 00:06:43.875
low price products, which were quite consistent
120
00:06:43.875 --> 00:06:46.875
with the purchasing power of the consumers.
121
00:06:47.695 --> 00:06:48.835
The purchasing power
122
00:06:48.855 --> 00:06:52.355
of the consumers in China is a little bit different from one
123
00:06:52.555 --> 00:06:54.635
area to the other and a number of people
124
00:06:54.865 --> 00:06:56.675
with low income are happy
125
00:06:56.895 --> 00:07:00.075
to buy high quality products with low price.
126
00:07:00.775 --> 00:07:03.515
In order to develop the business as quickly as possible,
127
00:07:03.575 --> 00:07:07.755
the company decided to franchise massive appeal to franchise
128
00:07:08.215 --> 00:07:10.995
and I will develop below the relationship
129
00:07:10.995 --> 00:07:12.875
between and the franchisees.
130
00:07:13.615 --> 00:07:17.435
But basically the revenues are not coming from royalties
131
00:07:17.625 --> 00:07:18.795
paid by the franchises,
132
00:07:18.855 --> 00:07:22.075
but by manufacturing the raw materials which are going
133
00:07:22.075 --> 00:07:23.355
to be sold to franchises
134
00:07:23.495 --> 00:07:25.315
and transformed into end product,
135
00:07:25.935 --> 00:07:29.795
the company is still predominantly a Chinese company
136
00:07:29.905 --> 00:07:33.875
operating in China with 80% of the revenues.
137
00:07:34.255 --> 00:07:35.715
But you remember what I said,
138
00:07:35.805 --> 00:07:37.355
there was an opening in Indonesia
139
00:07:37.855 --> 00:07:40.315
and the company wants to go for progressive
140
00:07:40.615 --> 00:07:42.995
and sustained international development.
141
00:07:43.335 --> 00:07:46.675
So the company wants to grow abroad overseas
142
00:07:46.695 --> 00:07:51.235
and it can count on one of the very important strengths
143
00:07:51.235 --> 00:07:53.795
of the company, operational excellence,
144
00:07:54.245 --> 00:07:55.715
excellence in manufacturing
145
00:07:56.255 --> 00:07:58.435
and excellence in the supply chain.
146
00:07:58.735 --> 00:08:02.235
The quality of execution is transforming the strategy
147
00:08:02.235 --> 00:08:04.155
of the company into financial success.
148
00:08:06.405 --> 00:08:08.635
Let's describe a little bit now the company
149
00:08:09.015 --> 00:08:10.115
in financial terms.
150
00:08:10.775 --> 00:08:12.635
We have the IPO prospectus
151
00:08:12.975 --> 00:08:15.435
and we have figures for the last 12 months
152
00:08:16.135 --> 00:08:18.475
before September, 2024,
153
00:08:19.575 --> 00:08:21.915
income $3.3 billion.
154
00:08:22.415 --> 00:08:26.795
So 23.6 billion Chinese yuan.
155
00:08:27.455 --> 00:08:29.155
That's not a very big company
156
00:08:29.575 --> 00:08:32.155
and when we compare with McDonald's, maybe the number
157
00:08:32.155 --> 00:08:33.355
of sites is larger,
158
00:08:33.855 --> 00:08:35.715
but the revenues are not exactly
159
00:08:35.815 --> 00:08:37.395
of the same order of magnitude.
160
00:08:38.175 --> 00:08:42.795
But what is mind blowing is gross plus 16% compared
161
00:08:42.815 --> 00:08:44.435
to 12 months before.
162
00:08:45.385 --> 00:08:49.835
Well, that's quite good, but the gross is not accelerating.
163
00:08:49.935 --> 00:08:51.075
In fact, it's slowing down.
164
00:08:51.095 --> 00:08:55.445
The revenues had doubled from 2021 to 2023.
165
00:08:55.505 --> 00:08:58.045
So there's a little bit of slowing down the growth
166
00:08:58.345 --> 00:09:00.325
and this is why now the company wants
167
00:09:00.325 --> 00:09:03.045
to get the resources in order to accelerate the growth.
168
00:09:03.825 --> 00:09:05.205
The company is profitable.
169
00:09:05.385 --> 00:09:09.725
The operating income, the EBIT represents 23% of revenues
170
00:09:09.915 --> 00:09:12.485
with 5.4 billion yuan
171
00:09:13.305 --> 00:09:15.285
and the return on capital employed,
172
00:09:15.285 --> 00:09:17.685
which is definitely the performance indicator, is
173
00:09:18.365 --> 00:09:21.725
absolutely stratospheric with 65%.
174
00:09:22.265 --> 00:09:25.645
So the company is immensely profitable, it's growing
175
00:09:26.105 --> 00:09:27.885
and it wants to accelerate its growth.
176
00:09:28.145 --> 00:09:31.525
The consequence of its operating income is an earning
177
00:09:31.645 --> 00:09:34.045
income, which is about $600 million
178
00:09:34.475 --> 00:09:37.085
with 4.2 billion yuan.
179
00:09:37.465 --> 00:09:39.445
So the company is profitable,
180
00:09:41.405 --> 00:09:44.465
but the question is, is the company profitable enough
181
00:09:44.485 --> 00:09:45.585
to finance his growth?
182
00:09:46.045 --> 00:09:49.065
And how is this performance perceived by the market?
183
00:09:50.045 --> 00:09:51.425
How do you finance your growth?
184
00:09:51.425 --> 00:09:52.785
Growth is organ and growth
185
00:09:52.815 --> 00:09:57.025
with capital expenditures 1.5 billion Chinese Iran
186
00:09:57.525 --> 00:10:01.345
and it's financed by EBITDA by far, by the EBITDA
187
00:10:01.375 --> 00:10:03.145
with 5.8 billion.
188
00:10:03.805 --> 00:10:05.825
So the company is generating an ebitda,
189
00:10:05.825 --> 00:10:10.225
which is almost four times its industrial investments now
190
00:10:10.225 --> 00:10:12.545
as a company is generating a high strong,
191
00:10:12.905 --> 00:10:15.665
positive free cash flow, it's a accumulating cash
192
00:10:16.525 --> 00:10:18.105
not returning to the shareholders,
193
00:10:18.485 --> 00:10:20.145
but piling up cash in order
194
00:10:20.165 --> 00:10:21.945
to finance the growth in the future.
195
00:10:22.565 --> 00:10:26.305
The cash net of financial debt of the company is 5.8 billion
196
00:10:27.065 --> 00:10:29.865
re mibi, so it's a one year of ebitda.
197
00:10:30.565 --> 00:10:34.425
The company is quite conservative in its financial strategy
198
00:10:34.645 --> 00:10:38.905
and its cash rich in order again to finance future growth.
199
00:10:39.845 --> 00:10:42.025
Now, how is it appraised by the market?
200
00:10:42.575 --> 00:10:44.265
There's a very well known multiple,
201
00:10:44.265 --> 00:10:48.625
which is enterprise value divided by ebitda 16 times
202
00:10:49.285 --> 00:10:52.025
and 16 is a high figure, which is a consequence
203
00:10:52.025 --> 00:10:54.545
of a company which is perceived as a high gross
204
00:10:54.805 --> 00:10:56.305
and high performing company
205
00:10:57.095 --> 00:10:59.425
with about stock market credibility,
206
00:11:00.265 --> 00:11:02.505
relative value creation, we very often knew the market
207
00:11:02.645 --> 00:11:05.025
to book dividing the enterprise value
208
00:11:05.065 --> 00:11:06.985
by the capital employee, the value
209
00:11:06.985 --> 00:11:09.745
of the business operations divided by the amount
210
00:11:09.745 --> 00:11:11.545
of money invested in business operations.
211
00:11:11.605 --> 00:11:14.105
And it's 12, which means that each
212
00:11:14.125 --> 00:11:16.345
and every REN mibi invested in
213
00:11:16.865 --> 00:11:19.105
business operations has been transforming to 12
214
00:11:20.055 --> 00:11:21.065
MBIs of value.
215
00:11:21.765 --> 00:11:24.105
The price to book is sometimes used.
216
00:11:24.155 --> 00:11:26.025
Price to book is market capitalization
217
00:11:26.025 --> 00:11:27.545
divided by book equity.
218
00:11:28.135 --> 00:11:30.705
It's roughly the same rationality as the market to book,
219
00:11:30.705 --> 00:11:33.145
but the market to book is much better in terms
220
00:11:33.145 --> 00:11:34.425
of financial analysis.
221
00:11:34.435 --> 00:11:37.025
Still the price to book is seven.
222
00:11:37.555 --> 00:11:40.945
Again, its value creation for the equity holders.
223
00:11:41.725 --> 00:11:44.665
As a conclusion, strong stock market credibility,
224
00:11:44.665 --> 00:11:48.345
definitely very high multiples, which is consistent
225
00:11:48.455 --> 00:11:50.225
with the performance which is very high
226
00:11:50.485 --> 00:11:52.185
and the growth, which is very promising.
227
00:11:54.665 --> 00:11:57.085
Now as it was suggested by the Wall Street Journal,
228
00:11:57.415 --> 00:12:00.245
let's compare McDonald's and me way
229
00:12:00.245 --> 00:12:02.765
because they are supposedly of the same size,
230
00:12:03.105 --> 00:12:05.205
at least in terms of number of stores.
231
00:12:06.065 --> 00:12:09.325
In my opinion, these two companies are not really comparable
232
00:12:09.595 --> 00:12:12.045
because it don't operate on the same market
233
00:12:12.385 --> 00:12:14.765
and they don't operate on the same business model
234
00:12:14.835 --> 00:12:16.205
with the same kind of product.
235
00:12:16.665 --> 00:12:18.245
But it's still quite interesting
236
00:12:18.345 --> 00:12:20.605
to benchmark the financial metrics.
237
00:12:21.705 --> 00:12:26.405
You remember mwe $3.3 billion growing revenues,
238
00:12:26.785 --> 00:12:29.365
Magnus 26 billion, much larger
239
00:12:30.105 --> 00:12:32.485
but stable return on sales.
240
00:12:32.715 --> 00:12:37.485
EBIT operating income represents 23% of revenues at MWE
241
00:12:37.905 --> 00:12:40.845
and 45% for McDonalds.
242
00:12:41.385 --> 00:12:44.485
That's a very big difference, which is due to the fact that
243
00:12:45.325 --> 00:12:50.005
MWE makes Monet selling raw materials when McDonald's makes
244
00:12:50.015 --> 00:12:54.125
money cashing in royalties, which are basically
245
00:12:54.755 --> 00:12:56.045
real estate royalties.
246
00:12:56.285 --> 00:12:58.325
I will elaborate on this point a little bit later.
247
00:12:59.065 --> 00:13:01.085
And real estate means what by the way, it means
248
00:13:01.085 --> 00:13:03.165
that the Rosie of McDonald is much less
249
00:13:03.165 --> 00:13:04.245
than the return on sales.
250
00:13:04.505 --> 00:13:06.205
The company's capital intensive
251
00:13:06.205 --> 00:13:08.445
because it's about Relay State.
252
00:13:08.825 --> 00:13:12.405
Now about mwe, the rose is about three times as much
253
00:13:12.405 --> 00:13:15.245
as a return on sales, which is the assets productivity
254
00:13:15.425 --> 00:13:17.725
of the company, the company's manufacturing,
255
00:13:18.105 --> 00:13:20.965
but it's not a very capital intensive business.
256
00:13:21.665 --> 00:13:25.245
Now in terms of market capitalization, MWE is promising
257
00:13:25.555 --> 00:13:27.205
with 14 billion us,
258
00:13:27.225 --> 00:13:31.885
but McDonald's is a giant with more than $200 billion
259
00:13:31.905 --> 00:13:32.925
of market cap.
260
00:13:34.245 --> 00:13:35.605
Interestingly, the enterprise value
261
00:13:35.625 --> 00:13:37.845
of EBITDA is roughly of the same size.
262
00:13:38.545 --> 00:13:40.085
Me sway is about 16
263
00:13:40.595 --> 00:13:43.605
with a higher rose than McDonald's
264
00:13:43.905 --> 00:13:46.525
and with more growth than mag don's.
265
00:13:46.525 --> 00:13:49.405
So you would expect that the enterprise value is lower worth
266
00:13:49.485 --> 00:13:51.645
macdonna, which is absolutely not the case.
267
00:13:52.195 --> 00:13:56.245
It's 19. So you understand that there's maybe a potential
268
00:13:56.305 --> 00:13:59.805
for growth in terms of me phase profitability,
269
00:14:00.035 --> 00:14:04.965
capital performance, the last not least ratio is a market
270
00:14:04.985 --> 00:14:09.325
to book enterprise value divided by capital employed 12
271
00:14:09.505 --> 00:14:12.845
for Mishu and only six for McDonalds.
272
00:14:13.305 --> 00:14:15.165
And it probably comes from the fact
273
00:14:15.165 --> 00:14:17.085
that the company is a capital intensive
274
00:14:17.355 --> 00:14:19.325
because of relay state.
275
00:14:21.535 --> 00:14:23.875
Of course what makes a difference between McDonald's
276
00:14:23.875 --> 00:14:27.755
and Mishu is not the number of sites, it's the size, size
277
00:14:27.755 --> 00:14:30.155
of revenues, market cap and so on and so forth.
278
00:14:30.815 --> 00:14:33.595
But there's another difference which is quite interesting.
279
00:14:33.855 --> 00:14:36.155
It comes from again the assets turnover.
280
00:14:36.695 --> 00:14:39.235
The assets turnover is bought. Three four ue.
281
00:14:39.975 --> 00:14:43.755
UE is producing manufacturing raw materials which are sold
282
00:14:43.755 --> 00:14:46.875
to the franchisees and transformed into finished product.
283
00:14:47.625 --> 00:14:48.995
It's light manufacturing.
284
00:14:49.175 --> 00:14:50.915
So the assets turnover is about three
285
00:14:51.695 --> 00:14:53.005
again, about McDonald's.
286
00:14:53.065 --> 00:14:54.645
The company is about real estate.
287
00:14:55.605 --> 00:14:59.725
McDonald's owns about 70% of its restaurant site, land
288
00:14:59.985 --> 00:15:04.045
and building and additional restaurants are owned building
289
00:15:04.345 --> 00:15:08.005
not the land long-term leasehold agreement with a landlord.
290
00:15:08.145 --> 00:15:11.445
But at the end of the day it's a real a state company which
291
00:15:11.445 --> 00:15:15.205
explains the high return on sales, the very low assets,
292
00:15:15.565 --> 00:15:18.685
turnover, and other metrics such as a market capitalization,
293
00:15:18.785 --> 00:15:21.445
the value of the building plus the value of the services
294
00:15:22.065 --> 00:15:24.645
and the enterprise value over a capital employed,
295
00:15:24.695 --> 00:15:26.805
which is significantly lower
296
00:15:27.155 --> 00:15:30.725
because the assets turnover is significantly lower.
297
00:15:33.235 --> 00:15:35.655
Now it's difficult to compare McDonald's and UE
298
00:15:35.655 --> 00:15:37.015
because one is really a state.
299
00:15:37.075 --> 00:15:38.295
The other one is manufacturing,
300
00:15:38.485 --> 00:15:41.495
even though there are some similarities in terms
301
00:15:41.495 --> 00:15:42.535
of business operations.
302
00:15:42.535 --> 00:15:46.855
So it could be interesting to compare UE with other company,
303
00:15:46.855 --> 00:15:49.895
company fast food, but with no relay state.
304
00:15:50.235 --> 00:15:51.415
The answer is Starbucks.
305
00:15:51.875 --> 00:15:54.375
Of course Starbucks is much bigger than me way
306
00:15:54.605 --> 00:15:57.095
with $36 billion of revenues.
307
00:15:57.395 --> 00:16:00.055
You remember McDonald's only 26 billion
308
00:16:00.435 --> 00:16:02.375
and me way is 3.3 billion.
309
00:16:02.835 --> 00:16:04.215
So Starbucks is much bigger,
310
00:16:04.635 --> 00:16:07.255
but at Starbucks there's no relay estate at all.
311
00:16:07.915 --> 00:16:10.135
No point of sale is owned by the company.
312
00:16:10.995 --> 00:16:15.935
The return on sales is 14% at Starbucks on 23% at Mewa.
313
00:16:16.075 --> 00:16:18.935
So Mewa is quite profitable as far
314
00:16:18.935 --> 00:16:20.135
as the p and l is concerned.
315
00:16:20.435 --> 00:16:22.135
But what is quite interesting is
316
00:16:22.135 --> 00:16:24.175
to observe the return capital employed.
317
00:16:24.475 --> 00:16:26.495
You remember light manufacturing for
318
00:16:27.395 --> 00:16:29.695
return capital employed 65%,
319
00:16:30.275 --> 00:16:34.455
118%, 2024 for Starbucks.
320
00:16:35.155 --> 00:16:37.095
And the reason is quite mechanical
321
00:16:37.355 --> 00:16:40.375
and technical, not so much a financial reason.
322
00:16:41.155 --> 00:16:44.215
The reason is coming from a contract sign between
323
00:16:44.735 --> 00:16:45.935
Starbucks and Nestle.
324
00:16:46.495 --> 00:16:49.695
Starbucks is proposing Nestle product in the stores
325
00:16:50.595 --> 00:16:52.455
for a long-term contract.
326
00:16:53.075 --> 00:16:56.335
Now Nestle paid cash upfront the amount of money,
327
00:16:56.865 --> 00:16:58.655
which basically means that it shows
328
00:16:58.755 --> 00:17:01.815
as a liability in the balance sheet of Starbucks,
329
00:17:02.025 --> 00:17:04.855
other long term operating liabilities,
330
00:17:05.555 --> 00:17:08.975
and it's going to be progressively transformed into revenues
331
00:17:09.365 --> 00:17:10.615
year after year.
332
00:17:11.155 --> 00:17:13.335
But capital employee is technically reduced
333
00:17:13.435 --> 00:17:16.775
by this other long-term operating liability.
334
00:17:16.965 --> 00:17:20.375
This is a reason why the assets turnover is absolutely
335
00:17:20.725 --> 00:17:22.695
stratospheric at Starbucks.
336
00:17:23.325 --> 00:17:26.855
It's not a matter of operations, it's a matter of contract.
337
00:17:27.595 --> 00:17:32.495
Now the market capitalization was more than $200 billion at
338
00:17:32.735 --> 00:17:37.655
McDonald's is only quotes $121 billion at Starbucks
339
00:17:38.285 --> 00:17:41.095
with higher rose and higher revenues.
340
00:17:41.675 --> 00:17:45.175
So you understand that the relay state plays a very big role
341
00:17:45.515 --> 00:17:46.655
at McDonald's.
342
00:17:47.185 --> 00:17:49.845
Enterprise value in EBITDA is 21,
343
00:17:49.975 --> 00:17:53.405
which is supposedly a performance, yes, gross no
344
00:17:54.105 --> 00:17:57.365
and 16 at Mefe and 19 at McDonald's.
345
00:17:57.365 --> 00:18:01.085
The enterprise value over capital employed is also very
346
00:18:01.085 --> 00:18:03.365
difficult to analyze because of the contract,
347
00:18:03.365 --> 00:18:07.005
which I already mentioned, 29 for Starbucks.
348
00:18:07.545 --> 00:18:09.725
So even though you compare Starbucks
349
00:18:10.385 --> 00:18:13.725
and sway with similarities in the business operations,
350
00:18:13.725 --> 00:18:17.205
you understand that some technical aspects makes a
351
00:18:17.205 --> 00:18:20.285
comparison and the benchmarking quite difficult.
352
00:18:22.365 --> 00:18:24.385
The three companies which I mobilized in order
353
00:18:24.445 --> 00:18:26.545
to do this benchmarking exercise
354
00:18:26.765 --> 00:18:30.025
or massively use a franchise in order
355
00:18:30.045 --> 00:18:31.745
to develop their business operations,
356
00:18:32.125 --> 00:18:33.625
but the systems seem
357
00:18:33.625 --> 00:18:35.665
to be quite different from one to the other.
358
00:18:36.485 --> 00:18:38.065
As far as McDonald's is concerned,
359
00:18:38.065 --> 00:18:40.545
the companies a real estate investors also franchisees
360
00:18:40.545 --> 00:18:43.305
paying the rent for the relay estate in addition
361
00:18:43.305 --> 00:18:46.265
to royalties based on revenues and profit.
362
00:18:47.205 --> 00:18:48.825
As far as Mewa is concerned,
363
00:18:49.325 --> 00:18:51.545
we have some information in the prospectus.
364
00:18:52.245 --> 00:18:54.705
I'm quite cautious about what I'm going to say
365
00:18:54.775 --> 00:18:57.305
because it's not fully transparent,
366
00:18:57.365 --> 00:19:00.625
but you see that the franchisees are paying quite limited
367
00:19:01.255 --> 00:19:02.345
franchise fees.
368
00:19:02.645 --> 00:19:04.345
So the payment upfront made
369
00:19:04.345 --> 00:19:06.185
by the FraNChiS is quite reasonable.
370
00:19:06.935 --> 00:19:10.425
Then during the operations, low royalties,
371
00:19:11.085 --> 00:19:13.665
no royalties at the end of the day,
372
00:19:13.885 --> 00:19:16.145
the royalties which are cashed in
373
00:19:16.325 --> 00:19:20.745
by Meise from the franchisees represent only 2.4%
374
00:19:20.805 --> 00:19:22.705
of Meise revenues.
375
00:19:23.765 --> 00:19:25.665
In addition to that, for the franchisees,
376
00:19:25.925 --> 00:19:29.425
the initial investment, the initial CapEx are quite reduced.
377
00:19:30.135 --> 00:19:31.665
It's not very capital intensive
378
00:19:31.765 --> 00:19:34.145
to transform the raw materials into ice creams
379
00:19:34.445 --> 00:19:35.625
and sparkling teas.
380
00:19:36.125 --> 00:19:38.825
So definitely Meise does not make the Monet
381
00:19:38.825 --> 00:19:40.425
with the franchisees.
382
00:19:41.085 --> 00:19:42.465
In terms of royalties
383
00:19:42.525 --> 00:19:45.625
and payments upfront, the revenue generation
384
00:19:45.765 --> 00:19:47.345
for Mease come from where
385
00:19:47.965 --> 00:19:52.345
it comes from selling the road materials to the franchisees.
386
00:19:54.595 --> 00:19:56.415
So as far as McDonald's
387
00:19:56.415 --> 00:19:58.415
and Mease are concerned, we are in front
388
00:19:58.415 --> 00:20:00.815
of two extremely differentiated
389
00:20:01.165 --> 00:20:02.935
franchise and p and l models.
390
00:20:04.375 --> 00:20:08.375
McDonald's is really a estate company which owns 70%
391
00:20:08.375 --> 00:20:13.335
of the sites, more than 70% if you include the restaurants
392
00:20:13.475 --> 00:20:16.335
for which McDonald's owns a building and not the land.
393
00:20:17.195 --> 00:20:19.895
So what happened, the franchises are using the premise
394
00:20:20.115 --> 00:20:22.935
and they are paying the rent in addition to the rent.
395
00:20:22.935 --> 00:20:26.415
They're paying royalties for the marketing support which is
396
00:20:26.655 --> 00:20:28.935
provided by McDonald's and so on and so forth.
397
00:20:29.555 --> 00:20:32.815
But basically the business consists in generating enough
398
00:20:32.815 --> 00:20:36.775
revenue so that McDonald's can repay the loan,
399
00:20:37.195 --> 00:20:38.335
repair the mortgage,
400
00:20:38.715 --> 00:20:42.295
and at the end of the day generate capital gains in the real
401
00:20:42.355 --> 00:20:44.175
estate investment business.
402
00:20:44.965 --> 00:20:46.015
What about mwe?
403
00:20:46.325 --> 00:20:47.445
It's about producing,
404
00:20:47.875 --> 00:20:50.885
producing raw materials which are transformed
405
00:20:51.545 --> 00:20:52.805
by the franchisees,
406
00:20:53.225 --> 00:20:56.085
but the franchisees are not paying so much upfront.
407
00:20:56.085 --> 00:21:00.165
There is no barrier to entry as far as finance is concerned.
408
00:21:00.825 --> 00:21:04.165
So basically they are paying of course in terms
409
00:21:04.165 --> 00:21:05.805
of industrial margins.
410
00:21:06.225 --> 00:21:08.765
So they are buying the raw materials and it's bread
411
00:21:08.865 --> 00:21:10.125
and butter for mwe.
412
00:21:12.025 --> 00:21:13.155
What is very interesting
413
00:21:13.155 --> 00:21:15.155
to understand when you compare these three companies
414
00:21:15.825 --> 00:21:18.915
that it's not only the size which is differentiating them,
415
00:21:19.105 --> 00:21:21.715
it's not only the franchise system which is differentiating,
416
00:21:21.715 --> 00:21:23.675
it's also the financial strategy.
417
00:21:24.775 --> 00:21:28.235
You remember that is generating an ebitda, which
418
00:21:28.375 --> 00:21:30.515
by far pays a capital expenditure.
419
00:21:30.515 --> 00:21:34.395
So the free cash flow is strong, is positive, is high.
420
00:21:35.065 --> 00:21:37.555
It's the same story for McDonald's and Starbucks,
421
00:21:37.575 --> 00:21:39.275
but what do McDonald's
422
00:21:39.275 --> 00:21:41.195
and Starbucks do with their free cash flow?
423
00:21:41.665 --> 00:21:43.275
They buy back their shares.
424
00:21:43.935 --> 00:21:46.235
So at the end of the day we are in a situation where
425
00:21:46.295 --> 00:21:47.795
for both McDonald's
426
00:21:47.795 --> 00:21:51.515
and Starbucks, the book equity is negative.
427
00:21:51.875 --> 00:21:55.555
Shareholders equity is what was invested by shareholders
428
00:21:55.555 --> 00:21:59.155
through capital, through additional paying capital on
429
00:21:59.155 --> 00:22:02.155
what they reinvested through retain earnings minus
430
00:22:03.035 --> 00:22:05.315
treasury stock and treasury stock.
431
00:22:05.315 --> 00:22:06.755
It's about the market value
432
00:22:06.895 --> 00:22:09.315
of the shares which we have bought back by the company.
433
00:22:09.815 --> 00:22:11.755
The rest is about book value of the shares
434
00:22:12.055 --> 00:22:13.355
and at the market value
435
00:22:13.455 --> 00:22:15.995
by far exceed the book value of the shares.
436
00:22:16.835 --> 00:22:19.875
Mechanically, the shareholders equity turns negative
437
00:22:20.415 --> 00:22:22.195
for McDonald's and Starbucks, not
438
00:22:22.195 --> 00:22:24.555
because they generated losses, it's
439
00:22:24.555 --> 00:22:25.915
because they generated plenty
440
00:22:25.975 --> 00:22:28.155
of profit transforming into cash
441
00:22:28.455 --> 00:22:31.555
and return to the shareholders through shares buy back.
442
00:22:31.935 --> 00:22:34.835
The equity is negative by $4 billion
443
00:22:34.855 --> 00:22:39.395
for McDonald's when the debt is positive by $51 billion,
444
00:22:40.125 --> 00:22:41.875
51 compare with four.
445
00:22:42.175 --> 00:22:45.155
It looks big, but the market capitalization
446
00:22:45.155 --> 00:22:48.955
of McDonald's you remember is more than $200 billion.
447
00:22:49.015 --> 00:22:53.115
Though no problem for the bankers is a different story
448
00:22:53.185 --> 00:22:55.875
because the company's growing McDonald's
449
00:22:55.875 --> 00:22:59.435
and Starbucks are not that much growing, so they don't have
450
00:22:59.435 --> 00:23:02.515
to reinvest their financial resources in the growth.
451
00:23:02.855 --> 00:23:07.315
So as they don't reinvest, they return has to prepare
452
00:23:07.335 --> 00:23:10.235
for growth, they want to grow at a higher rate, they want
453
00:23:10.235 --> 00:23:12.075
to grow abroad, it's going to consume a lot
454
00:23:12.075 --> 00:23:13.355
of financial resources.
455
00:23:13.625 --> 00:23:15.475
This is why they have to retain the cash.
456
00:23:15.865 --> 00:23:18.875
They have plenty of cash in the balance sheet at the end
457
00:23:18.875 --> 00:23:22.755
of 2024, $800 million compared with equity
458
00:23:22.855 --> 00:23:23.915
of $2 billion.
459
00:23:24.615 --> 00:23:26.315
And it is before the IPO.
460
00:23:26.335 --> 00:23:29.555
The IPO is going to add an additional $400 million
461
00:23:29.775 --> 00:23:31.275
to the cash situation of the company.
462
00:23:31.935 --> 00:23:33.115
The company wants to grow.
463
00:23:33.415 --> 00:23:36.675
You need to have plenty of financial cash,
464
00:23:36.865 --> 00:23:39.795
financial resources in your bank account the day
465
00:23:39.795 --> 00:23:40.915
you want to go for growth.
466
00:23:43.455 --> 00:23:45.925
You have observed that the EBITDA generated by
467
00:23:46.645 --> 00:23:49.285
represents about four times its capital expenditures.
468
00:23:49.745 --> 00:23:51.725
So the free cash flow is strongly positive.
469
00:23:52.385 --> 00:23:54.165
The company is growing. Generally speaking,
470
00:23:54.165 --> 00:23:56.525
when you grow you need financial resources.
471
00:23:56.865 --> 00:23:59.445
But when the free cash flow is strongly positive,
472
00:23:59.825 --> 00:24:03.725
you don't need to visit the capital market is you New shares
473
00:24:03.785 --> 00:24:05.805
and dute, the initial founders.
474
00:24:06.635 --> 00:24:09.205
This is why sources Crunchbase.
475
00:24:09.495 --> 00:24:13.285
There was only one unique fundraising in the history
476
00:24:13.285 --> 00:24:16.005
of the company 2021 series A
477
00:24:16.005 --> 00:24:18.125
and there was no series B of any kind.
478
00:24:18.585 --> 00:24:22.965
2 billion Es, which is about $280 million
479
00:24:23.625 --> 00:24:25.765
at the primo evaluation of 18 billion.
480
00:24:25.985 --> 00:24:27.965
So $2.5 billion,
481
00:24:28.625 --> 00:24:31.845
2.5 plus 0.3 is about $2.8 billion.
482
00:24:32.745 --> 00:24:34.805
For the investors who participated
483
00:24:34.905 --> 00:24:36.485
to this unique fundraising.
484
00:24:36.485 --> 00:24:40.245
In 2021 IPO 2025,
485
00:24:41.265 --> 00:24:44.645
MWE took this opportunity in order to raise new funds,
486
00:24:45.185 --> 00:24:47.405
add additional cash on the pile of cash
487
00:24:47.505 --> 00:24:51.205
of 800,000,444 million.
488
00:24:51.265 --> 00:24:53.205
So today they have 1.2 plus
489
00:24:53.985 --> 00:24:55.845
and for the shareholders quite good news because
490
00:24:55.845 --> 00:24:59.645
after two trading days the market cap is 14 billion.
491
00:25:00.265 --> 00:25:03.885
You can compare that with a two $2.8 billion
492
00:25:04.425 --> 00:25:05.645
in 2021.
493
00:25:05.705 --> 00:25:08.805
So only four years ago shareholders are happy.
494
00:25:11.005 --> 00:25:13.905
It looks like all green lights for me.
495
00:25:14.735 --> 00:25:18.825
Revenue gross, number of side gross, plenty
496
00:25:18.845 --> 00:25:20.625
of cash in the bank account, high rose,
497
00:25:20.885 --> 00:25:22.705
strong stock market credibility.
498
00:25:23.605 --> 00:25:26.825
But there is still an issue, which is a little bit pending.
499
00:25:27.405 --> 00:25:30.665
The franchise system is extremely decentralized.
500
00:25:31.325 --> 00:25:32.785
As a consequence there's no
501
00:25:32.805 --> 00:25:35.825
or little central quality control.
502
00:25:36.965 --> 00:25:40.225
Of course there's a strong impact in terms of cost.
503
00:25:40.325 --> 00:25:41.465
You reduce your cost
504
00:25:41.465 --> 00:25:43.705
because there's no quality control cost.
505
00:25:44.095 --> 00:25:45.185
It's good for the p and l.
506
00:25:45.565 --> 00:25:48.985
The competitor SHU has decided to go
507
00:25:48.985 --> 00:25:50.905
for a centralized quality control.
508
00:25:51.965 --> 00:25:56.265
SHU is more premium, is more China chic as they say.
509
00:25:56.685 --> 00:25:58.305
And of course it's very expensive
510
00:25:58.325 --> 00:26:00.185
to centralize the quality control,
511
00:26:00.685 --> 00:26:03.185
but it's probably bad for the p and l
512
00:26:03.245 --> 00:26:05.185
and a little bit better for the sustainability.
513
00:26:06.155 --> 00:26:09.905
There have been some franchisees at which were not
514
00:26:09.905 --> 00:26:11.745
that serious about food safety.
515
00:26:11.875 --> 00:26:13.665
There were health problems
516
00:26:14.285 --> 00:26:17.105
and health problems can be very much at the detriment
517
00:26:17.105 --> 00:26:18.145
of your sustainability
518
00:26:18.445 --> 00:26:20.785
and certainly your reputation capital.
519
00:26:21.685 --> 00:26:23.225
That's a negative side of it.
520
00:26:23.445 --> 00:26:26.065
The positive side is when it's decentralized,
521
00:26:26.445 --> 00:26:29.585
it can be a huge adaptation to local conditions
522
00:26:30.285 --> 00:26:32.505
and that was a great lever.
523
00:26:32.975 --> 00:26:34.545
When Covid happened.
524
00:26:34.805 --> 00:26:38.025
The company was very much covid resilient,
525
00:26:38.555 --> 00:26:39.945
which is absolutely great
526
00:26:39.945 --> 00:26:44.325
because it went through the pandemic, keep pointing on you,
527
00:26:44.325 --> 00:26:46.965
increasing the number of stores which were open.
528
00:26:47.385 --> 00:26:49.845
You remember the story about stores opening.
529
00:26:50.385 --> 00:26:52.405
So it's quite different from McDonald's,
530
00:26:52.405 --> 00:26:54.565
which is extremely serious about quality.
531
00:26:55.425 --> 00:26:58.365
Um, the impact is in the return on sales certainly,
532
00:26:58.865 --> 00:27:01.605
but there's also an impact in the sustainability,
533
00:27:01.695 --> 00:27:05.165
which might be an issue in the long term for mwe.
534
00:27:06.885 --> 00:27:08.865
As a matter of conclusion, we can say
535
00:27:08.865 --> 00:27:12.225
that MWE is definitely a growth story.
536
00:27:13.125 --> 00:27:14.785
The company is characterized
537
00:27:14.965 --> 00:27:19.105
by operational excellence in manufacturing, in supply chain,
538
00:27:19.645 --> 00:27:21.705
in the relationship with the franchisees,
539
00:27:21.725 --> 00:27:23.425
in the openings of the store, et cetera.
540
00:27:23.685 --> 00:27:25.345
And financial prudence.
541
00:27:25.725 --> 00:27:28.785
The company is extremely conservative in its financial
542
00:27:29.105 --> 00:27:31.545
strategy, which is extremely good news,
543
00:27:32.285 --> 00:27:35.665
but the company has very much decentralized its business.
544
00:27:36.685 --> 00:27:40.785
Is it sustainable when the size is growing, when the number
545
00:27:40.805 --> 00:27:44.625
of stores is going to increase very much when you go abroad,
546
00:27:44.695 --> 00:27:47.225
when you go into different environments?
547
00:27:47.645 --> 00:27:48.825
Can you decentralize?
548
00:27:49.285 --> 00:27:52.265
Are you forced to introduce a little bit of control,
549
00:27:52.295 --> 00:27:56.265
centralized control in the business, then at the expense
550
00:27:56.325 --> 00:27:58.505
of growth, at the expense of p and l,
551
00:27:58.925 --> 00:28:02.185
but for the benefit of sustainability, this is
552
00:28:02.185 --> 00:28:04.025
what we are going to observe in the future.
553
00:28:04.455 --> 00:28:06.705
Keeping on the benchmarking exercise
554
00:28:06.705 --> 00:28:09.865
between sway on one side and McDonald
555
00:28:10.005 --> 00:28:12.985
and Starbucks on the other hand, thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast, which is devoted to a company whose logo is a round snowman.
The snowman has a crown and a head, so it is a king and a king has a scepter.
A scepter is in the right hand of the snowman and it's a nice cream.
In fact, this person is a king of Hane snow.
Hane snow is the English translation of the name of a Chinese company.
Misre.
Why talk about mwe? Because just a few days ago, the 3rd of March, 2025, the company went public.
It was listed in the Hong Kong stock exchange, very well known for the Hong San Index and it was a tremendous success.
The stock price initially was 202.5 Hong Kong dollars, which is about 28 US dollars.
For the first year of listing, the stock price went up by 43%, reaching 290 Hong Kong dollars.
At the end of the first day of listing the market capitalization is then 14 billion US dollars.
So it's quite significant company, but what is absolutely mind blowing is that the offer was subscribed 5,258 times.
So the demand was stratospheric against the offer.
It's by the way, quite curious that the stock price went up only by 43%.
Now, why is the company extremely successful and highly demanding on stock market? Because it's a company which is growing, the revenues are growing and the growth is not realized at the expense of performance because in net income, the bottom line represents 16% of sales of revenues.
So it is a company which is growing and performing with such metrics.
One could expect that this company is in a AI business, data centers cloud or whatsoever.
Absolutely not.
It is just selling sparkling tea, refreshing drinks, ice cream, and at a very, very low price, less than a US D, closer to one, rein B, the Chinese Yuan.
And we are going to discuss the marketing and commercial strategy of the company in the next slide.
Definitely the timing of the IPO was absolutely excellent, extremely favorable stock market conditions.
If you look at the last 12 months of the Hong and you compare that with a NASDAQ over the first 11 months, the trend was quite the same, more volatility for the Hong, but basically over 11 months, both stock prices, stock market index went up by 20%.
But if you look at the last months, the Hong made an additional 20% when when Nasdaq was down by about 13%.
So definitely the Hong Kong market is doing quite well.
And in addition to that, there is another company operating roughly the same industry as booming, which went public in February.
So quite recently and since the IPO, the stock price went uh by 23%.
So definitely the market isn't the demand for this kind of stocks.
Let's go back to the story of mbe.
The company was created in 1997 and during six years the company just failed at opening stores which were successful.
It was about opening and closing.
In 2003, the company makes its first successful localization, then it becomes sustainable.
In 2005, the company is producing its signature product, the ice cream at one Chinese Yuan one Ren mibi, which represents 14 US cents.
So it's quite low cost and it's going to become extremely popular.
Now the day you want to develop your business, you have to go through franchise.
Franchise is a fantastic lever for developing sites at the speed of light in 2007, the start the franchise activity.
Now the question is what do you offer to the franchisees? The answer is raw materials, which are produced by the company and in 2012 the company started production manufacturing facilities in Han in order to sell raw material for franchisees franchises.
And then the development accelerated In 2020, the number of stores reaches the outstanding level of 10,000 and the company is opening its first store outside China in Indonesia.
Now in the 31st of December, 2024, there are 46,479 stores, which is an outstanding commercial development an 3rd of March.
So the there's a company is listed, the Wall Street Journal headline is, forget about McDonald's, this Chinese fast food chain is now the world's biggest.
And that's absolutely true in terms of number of sites.
If you look at the evolution of worldwide stores for a number of companies, mwe, but competitors such as McDonald's, Starbucks and Subway, it's absolutely mind blowing.
So basically as far as McDonald's is concerned, from 2019 to 2024, the number of stores of locations is about less than 40,000 to a bit more than 40,000.
What about Starbucks from 30 to 40,000, subway down from 40,000 to 35,000 plus, and what about me? Way from less than 10,000 to more than 46,000.
So in terms of number of points of sales, it's absolutely outstanding.
Now forget about McDonald's is simply a journalist punchline because the rest of the metrics is slightly different.
We are going to look at that in the next slide.
What is a business model of me? I already mentioned that the company is selling low price products, which were quite consistent with the purchasing power of the consumers.
The purchasing power of the consumers in China is a little bit different from one area to the other and a number of people with low income are happy to buy high quality products with low price.
In order to develop the business as quickly as possible, the company decided to franchise massive appeal to franchise and I will develop below the relationship between and the franchisees.
But basically the revenues are not coming from royalties paid by the franchises, but by manufacturing the raw materials which are going to be sold to franchises and transformed into end product, the company is still predominantly a Chinese company operating in China with 80% of the revenues.
But you remember what I said, there was an opening in Indonesia and the company wants to go for progressive and sustained international development.
So the company wants to grow abroad overseas and it can count on one of the very important strengths of the company, operational excellence, excellence in manufacturing and excellence in the supply chain.
The quality of execution is transforming the strategy of the company into financial success.
Let's describe a little bit now the company in financial terms.
We have the IPO prospectus and we have figures for the last 12 months before September, 2024, income $3.3 billion.
So 23.6 billion Chinese yuan.
That's not a very big company and when we compare with McDonald's, maybe the number of sites is larger, but the revenues are not exactly of the same order of magnitude.
But what is mind blowing is gross plus 16% compared to 12 months before.
Well, that's quite good, but the gross is not accelerating.
In fact, it's slowing down.
The revenues had doubled from 2021 to 2023.
So there's a little bit of slowing down the growth and this is why now the company wants to get the resources in order to accelerate the growth.
The company is profitable.
The operating income, the EBIT represents 23% of revenues with 5.4 billion yuan and the return on capital employed, which is definitely the performance indicator, is absolutely stratospheric with 65%.
So the company is immensely profitable, it's growing and it wants to accelerate its growth.
The consequence of its operating income is an earning income, which is about $600 million with 4.2 billion yuan.
So the company is profitable, but the question is, is the company profitable enough to finance his growth? And how is this performance perceived by the market? How do you finance your growth? Growth is organ and growth with capital expenditures 1.5 billion Chinese Iran and it's financed by EBITDA by far, by the EBITDA with 5.8 billion.
So the company is generating an ebitda, which is almost four times its industrial investments now as a company is generating a high strong, positive free cash flow, it's a accumulating cash not returning to the shareholders, but piling up cash in order to finance the growth in the future.
The cash net of financial debt of the company is 5.8 billion re mibi, so it's a one year of ebitda.
The company is quite conservative in its financial strategy and its cash rich in order again to finance future growth.
Now, how is it appraised by the market? There's a very well known multiple, which is enterprise value divided by ebitda 16 times and 16 is a high figure, which is a consequence of a company which is perceived as a high gross and high performing company with about stock market credibility, relative value creation, we very often knew the market to book dividing the enterprise value by the capital employee, the value of the business operations divided by the amount of money invested in business operations.
And it's 12, which means that each and every REN mibi invested in business operations has been transforming to 12 MBIs of value.
The price to book is sometimes used.
Price to book is market capitalization divided by book equity.
It's roughly the same rationality as the market to book, but the market to book is much better in terms of financial analysis.
Still the price to book is seven.
Again, its value creation for the equity holders.
As a conclusion, strong stock market credibility, definitely very high multiples, which is consistent with the performance which is very high and the growth, which is very promising.
Now as it was suggested by the Wall Street Journal, let's compare McDonald's and me way because they are supposedly of the same size, at least in terms of number of stores.
In my opinion, these two companies are not really comparable because it don't operate on the same market and they don't operate on the same business model with the same kind of product.
But it's still quite interesting to benchmark the financial metrics.
You remember mwe $3.3 billion growing revenues, Magnus 26 billion, much larger but stable return on sales.
EBIT operating income represents 23% of revenues at MWE and 45% for McDonalds.
That's a very big difference, which is due to the fact that MWE makes Monet selling raw materials when McDonald's makes money cashing in royalties, which are basically real estate royalties.
I will elaborate on this point a little bit later.
And real estate means what by the way, it means that the Rosie of McDonald is much less than the return on sales.
The company's capital intensive because it's about Relay State.
Now about mwe, the rose is about three times as much as a return on sales, which is the assets productivity of the company, the company's manufacturing, but it's not a very capital intensive business.
Now in terms of market capitalization, MWE is promising with 14 billion us, but McDonald's is a giant with more than $200 billion of market cap.
Interestingly, the enterprise value of EBITDA is roughly of the same size.
Me sway is about 16 with a higher rose than McDonald's and with more growth than mag don's.
So you would expect that the enterprise value is lower worth macdonna, which is absolutely not the case.
It's 19.
So you understand that there's maybe a potential for growth in terms of me phase profitability, capital performance, the last not least ratio is a market to book enterprise value divided by capital employed 12 for Mishu and only six for McDonalds.
And it probably comes from the fact that the company is a capital intensive because of relay state.
Of course what makes a difference between McDonald's and Mishu is not the number of sites, it's the size, size of revenues, market cap and so on and so forth.
But there's another difference which is quite interesting.
It comes from again the assets turnover.
The assets turnover is bought.
Three four ue.
UE is producing manufacturing raw materials which are sold to the franchisees and transformed into finished product.
It's light manufacturing.
So the assets turnover is about three again, about McDonald's.
The company is about real estate.
McDonald's owns about 70% of its restaurant site, land and building and additional restaurants are owned building not the land long-term leasehold agreement with a landlord.
But at the end of the day it's a real a state company which explains the high return on sales, the very low assets, turnover, and other metrics such as a market capitalization, the value of the building plus the value of the services and the enterprise value over a capital employed, which is significantly lower because the assets turnover is significantly lower.
Now it's difficult to compare McDonald's and UE because one is really a state.
The other one is manufacturing, even though there are some similarities in terms of business operations.
So it could be interesting to compare UE with other company, company fast food, but with no relay state.
The answer is Starbucks.
Of course Starbucks is much bigger than me way with $36 billion of revenues.
You remember McDonald's only 26 billion and me way is 3.3 billion.
So Starbucks is much bigger, but at Starbucks there's no relay estate at all.
No point of sale is owned by the company.
The return on sales is 14% at Starbucks on 23% at Mewa.
So Mewa is quite profitable as far as the p and l is concerned.
But what is quite interesting is to observe the return capital employed.
You remember light manufacturing for return capital employed 65%, 118%, 2024 for Starbucks.
And the reason is quite mechanical and technical, not so much a financial reason.
The reason is coming from a contract sign between Starbucks and Nestle.
Starbucks is proposing Nestle product in the stores for a long-term contract.
Now Nestle paid cash upfront the amount of money, which basically means that it shows as a liability in the balance sheet of Starbucks, other long term operating liabilities, and it's going to be progressively transformed into revenues year after year.
But capital employee is technically reduced by this other long-term operating liability.
This is a reason why the assets turnover is absolutely stratospheric at Starbucks.
It's not a matter of operations, it's a matter of contract.
Now the market capitalization was more than $200 billion at McDonald's is only quotes $121 billion at Starbucks with higher rose and higher revenues.
So you understand that the relay state plays a very big role at McDonald's.
Enterprise value in EBITDA is 21, which is supposedly a performance, yes, gross no and 16 at Mefe and 19 at McDonald's.
The enterprise value over capital employed is also very difficult to analyze because of the contract, which I already mentioned, 29 for Starbucks.
So even though you compare Starbucks and sway with similarities in the business operations, you understand that some technical aspects makes a comparison and the benchmarking quite difficult.
The three companies which I mobilized in order to do this benchmarking exercise or massively use a franchise in order to develop their business operations, but the systems seem to be quite different from one to the other.
As far as McDonald's is concerned, the companies a real estate investors also franchisees paying the rent for the relay estate in addition to royalties based on revenues and profit.
As far as Mewa is concerned, we have some information in the prospectus.
I'm quite cautious about what I'm going to say because it's not fully transparent, but you see that the franchisees are paying quite limited franchise fees.
So the payment upfront made by the FraNChiS is quite reasonable.
Then during the operations, low royalties, no royalties at the end of the day, the royalties which are cashed in by Meise from the franchisees represent only 2.4% of Meise revenues.
In addition to that, for the franchisees, the initial investment, the initial CapEx are quite reduced.
It's not very capital intensive to transform the raw materials into ice creams and sparkling teas.
So definitely Meise does not make the Monet with the franchisees.
In terms of royalties and payments upfront, the revenue generation for Mease come from where it comes from selling the road materials to the franchisees.
So as far as McDonald's and Mease are concerned, we are in front of two extremely differentiated franchise and p and l models.
McDonald's is really a estate company which owns 70% of the sites, more than 70% if you include the restaurants for which McDonald's owns a building and not the land.
So what happened, the franchises are using the premise and they are paying the rent in addition to the rent.
They're paying royalties for the marketing support which is provided by McDonald's and so on and so forth.
But basically the business consists in generating enough revenue so that McDonald's can repay the loan, repair the mortgage, and at the end of the day generate capital gains in the real estate investment business.
What about mwe? It's about producing, producing raw materials which are transformed by the franchisees, but the franchisees are not paying so much upfront.
There is no barrier to entry as far as finance is concerned.
So basically they are paying of course in terms of industrial margins.
So they are buying the raw materials and it's bread and butter for mwe.
What is very interesting to understand when you compare these three companies that it's not only the size which is differentiating them, it's not only the franchise system which is differentiating, it's also the financial strategy.
You remember that is generating an ebitda, which by far pays a capital expenditure.
So the free cash flow is strong, is positive, is high.
It's the same story for McDonald's and Starbucks, but what do McDonald's and Starbucks do with their free cash flow? They buy back their shares.
So at the end of the day we are in a situation where for both McDonald's and Starbucks, the book equity is negative.
Shareholders equity is what was invested by shareholders through capital, through additional paying capital on what they reinvested through retain earnings minus treasury stock and treasury stock.
It's about the market value of the shares which we have bought back by the company.
The rest is about book value of the shares and at the market value by far exceed the book value of the shares.
Mechanically, the shareholders equity turns negative for McDonald's and Starbucks, not because they generated losses, it's because they generated plenty of profit transforming into cash and return to the shareholders through shares buy back.
The equity is negative by $4 billion for McDonald's when the debt is positive by $51 billion, 51 compare with four.
It looks big, but the market capitalization of McDonald's you remember is more than $200 billion.
Though no problem for the bankers is a different story because the company's growing McDonald's and Starbucks are not that much growing, so they don't have to reinvest their financial resources in the growth.
So as they don't reinvest, they return has to prepare for growth, they want to grow at a higher rate, they want to grow abroad, it's going to consume a lot of financial resources.
This is why they have to retain the cash.
They have plenty of cash in the balance sheet at the end of 2024, $800 million compared with equity of $2 billion.
And it is before the IPO.
The IPO is going to add an additional $400 million to the cash situation of the company.
The company wants to grow.
You need to have plenty of financial cash, financial resources in your bank account the day you want to go for growth.
You have observed that the EBITDA generated by represents about four times its capital expenditures.
So the free cash flow is strongly positive.
The company is growing.
Generally speaking, when you grow you need financial resources.
But when the free cash flow is strongly positive, you don't need to visit the capital market is you New shares and dute, the initial founders.
This is why sources Crunchbase.
There was only one unique fundraising in the history of the company 2021 series A and there was no series B of any kind.
2 billion Es, which is about $280 million at the primo evaluation of 18 billion.
So $2.5 billion, 2.5 plus 0.3 is about $2.8 billion.
For the investors who participated to this unique fundraising.
In 2021 IPO 2025, MWE took this opportunity in order to raise new funds, add additional cash on the pile of cash of 800,000,444 million.
So today they have 1.2 plus and for the shareholders quite good news because after two trading days the market cap is 14 billion.
You can compare that with a two $2.8 billion in 2021.
So only four years ago shareholders are happy.
It looks like all green lights for me.
Revenue gross, number of side gross, plenty of cash in the bank account, high rose, strong stock market credibility.
But there is still an issue, which is a little bit pending.
The franchise system is extremely decentralized.
As a consequence there's no or little central quality control.
Of course there's a strong impact in terms of cost.
You reduce your cost because there's no quality control cost.
It's good for the p and l.
The competitor SHU has decided to go for a centralized quality control.
SHU is more premium, is more China chic as they say.
And of course it's very expensive to centralize the quality control, but it's probably bad for the p and l and a little bit better for the sustainability.
There have been some franchisees at which were not that serious about food safety.
There were health problems and health problems can be very much at the detriment of your sustainability and certainly your reputation capital.
That's a negative side of it.
The positive side is when it's decentralized, it can be a huge adaptation to local conditions and that was a great lever.
When Covid happened.
The company was very much covid resilient, which is absolutely great because it went through the pandemic, keep pointing on you, increasing the number of stores which were open.
You remember the story about stores opening.
So it's quite different from McDonald's, which is extremely serious about quality.
Um, the impact is in the return on sales certainly, but there's also an impact in the sustainability, which might be an issue in the long term for mwe.
As a matter of conclusion, we can say that MWE is definitely a growth story.
The company is characterized by operational excellence in manufacturing, in supply chain, in the relationship with the franchisees, in the openings of the store, et cetera.
And financial prudence.
The company is extremely conservative in its financial strategy, which is extremely good news, but the company has very much decentralized its business.
Is it sustainable when the size is growing, when the number of stores is going to increase very much when you go abroad, when you go into different environments? Can you decentralize? Are you forced to introduce a little bit of control, centralized control in the business, then at the expense of growth, at the expense of p and l, but for the benefit of sustainability, this is what we are going to observe in the future.
Keeping on the benchmarking exercise between sway on one side and McDonald and Starbucks on the other hand, thank you very much.