November 2023 Vidcast // Oil acquisitions: financial rationality and economic governance
Major financial moves around black gold
Professor Jacquet looks at recent acquisitions in the oil sector at a time when we are advocating the decarbonization of the planet.
He also looks back at the history of major oil companies in the United States.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:08.265 --> 00:00:11.415
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast, which is dedicated
2
00:00:11.595 --> 00:00:15.495
to the wave of oil acquisitions currently
3
00:00:15.855 --> 00:00:17.055
observed in the United States.
4
00:00:17.755 --> 00:00:21.775
We will discuss some financial metrics around the valuation
5
00:00:21.795 --> 00:00:24.775
of reserves, but also turn our attention
6
00:00:24.875 --> 00:00:26.775
to the probable consequences
7
00:00:27.035 --> 00:00:29.215
of these operations on the economic
8
00:00:29.505 --> 00:00:30.895
governance of the country.
9
00:00:32.815 --> 00:00:34.415
A few announcements to start with.
10
00:00:35.015 --> 00:00:39.335
A few days ago, the 23rd of October, 2023,
11
00:00:39.645 --> 00:00:42.095
Chevron announces buying Hess
12
00:00:42.475 --> 00:00:45.015
for 53 billion US dollars.
13
00:00:45.765 --> 00:00:47.255
It's an all stock transaction.
14
00:00:47.525 --> 00:00:51.135
It's paid in shares, not a dollar of cash out.
15
00:00:51.615 --> 00:00:53.495
A few days before the 11th of October,
16
00:00:54.085 --> 00:00:58.215
ExxonMobile announced buying Pioneer Natural Resources
17
00:00:58.275 --> 00:01:02.295
for $60 billion again, paid in shares.
18
00:01:02.805 --> 00:01:05.255
Both are all stock transactions.
19
00:01:06.405 --> 00:01:08.615
When you observe the evolutions as stock prices,
20
00:01:08.925 --> 00:01:11.815
it's absolutely clear that the capital markets don't like
21
00:01:11.865 --> 00:01:12.895
these operations.
22
00:01:13.685 --> 00:01:15.815
When ExxonMobil makes the announcement,
23
00:01:16.075 --> 00:01:18.535
the stock price is down by 4.1%.
24
00:01:19.165 --> 00:01:22.455
When Chevron makes its own announcement a few days later,
25
00:01:22.875 --> 00:01:26.815
the stock price is immediately down by 5.5%, then it's going
26
00:01:26.815 --> 00:01:28.095
to stabilize more or less,
27
00:01:28.635 --> 00:01:31.975
and then there's another drop by 7%.
28
00:01:32.155 --> 00:01:35.935
So definitely capital markets don't appreciate very
29
00:01:35.935 --> 00:01:37.015
much these strategies.
30
00:01:37.665 --> 00:01:40.455
ExxonMobil and Chevron belongs to the same industry, oil
31
00:01:40.455 --> 00:01:42.855
and gas, and they don't share only that.
32
00:01:42.855 --> 00:01:44.975
They also share their financial strategy.
33
00:01:45.755 --> 00:01:48.455
Low debt, marginal debt, equity, finance
34
00:01:48.975 --> 00:01:52.015
companies returning cash to shareholders, uh,
35
00:01:52.045 --> 00:01:54.375
massive dividend growing dividend
36
00:01:54.435 --> 00:01:57.575
and also massive share buybacks.
37
00:01:58.275 --> 00:02:00.215
As far as ExxonMobil is concerned.
38
00:02:00.215 --> 00:02:03.575
In 2022, the company paid a dividend of $15 billion
39
00:02:04.195 --> 00:02:06.935
and bought back its shares for another 15 billion.
40
00:02:06.935 --> 00:02:09.735
So you return $30 billion to the shareholders.
41
00:02:10.685 --> 00:02:12.975
Chevron 2022 dividend,
42
00:02:13.075 --> 00:02:16.015
11 billion shares buyback five billions.
43
00:02:16.435 --> 00:02:19.935
So these returns to the shareholders are quite significant.
44
00:02:21.145 --> 00:02:23.295
Let's start with a little bit of history.
45
00:02:23.725 --> 00:02:27.175
Chevron is a result of the merger between standard
46
00:02:27.315 --> 00:02:29.855
of California and Gulf Oil,
47
00:02:30.105 --> 00:02:32.175
which happened in the mid eighties.
48
00:02:33.245 --> 00:02:34.775
This is one of my favorite studies
49
00:02:34.835 --> 00:02:39.735
and this is why in February, 2020, I produced AT cast on
50
00:02:40.255 --> 00:02:43.655
T-Bone Pickens, who had passed away, uh, shortly before,
51
00:02:44.035 --> 00:02:46.335
and Pickens was more
52
00:02:46.335 --> 00:02:49.735
or less the initiat of the merger between SoCal and Girl fod
53
00:02:49.735 --> 00:02:51.735
because he tried to make a takeover.
54
00:02:51.945 --> 00:02:55.575
Horse style takeover on girl foil, I think observed
55
00:02:55.575 --> 00:02:59.925
that the value of the oil reserves was significantly more
56
00:02:59.925 --> 00:03:03.165
than the enterprise value than what you do.
57
00:03:03.385 --> 00:03:06.685
You buy the company, you extract, you produce,
58
00:03:06.785 --> 00:03:08.605
you generate revenues out of that,
59
00:03:08.905 --> 00:03:11.165
and for the rest of it you simply abandon
60
00:03:11.345 --> 00:03:13.925
and you cash in the value of the reserves.
61
00:03:15.025 --> 00:03:18.645
But I have to add some additional historical comment about
62
00:03:18.645 --> 00:03:19.925
what happened before.
63
00:03:20.905 --> 00:03:24.725
Before standard dollar of California, it was standard dollar
64
00:03:25.075 --> 00:03:26.205
with a very, um,
65
00:03:26.565 --> 00:03:28.565
I would say specific gentleman whose name was
66
00:03:28.795 --> 00:03:30.485
John Davidson, Rockefeller.
67
00:03:30.485 --> 00:03:35.205
Rockefeller was obsessed by customers quality pricing
68
00:03:36.005 --> 00:03:37.205
services and so on and so forth.
69
00:03:37.225 --> 00:03:39.325
So he wanted to create value for the customers,
70
00:03:39.625 --> 00:03:42.565
but at the determined at the expense of the value
71
00:03:42.665 --> 00:03:44.645
and the relationship with the stakeholders.
72
00:03:45.665 --> 00:03:50.325
In fact, the business practices of standard oil with uh,
73
00:03:50.425 --> 00:03:54.045
the partners, with the suppliers, with the competitors were
74
00:03:54.925 --> 00:03:58.445
absolutely questionable, very much criticized.
75
00:03:58.865 --> 00:04:01.605
And at the end of the day, the Court of Justice decided
76
00:04:01.635 --> 00:04:03.285
that there should be a stock split.
77
00:04:03.545 --> 00:04:06.365
It was implemented in 1911
78
00:04:06.825 --> 00:04:09.405
and there was a dissolution of the 31 firms,
79
00:04:09.495 --> 00:04:13.645
which these 31 firms became autonomous on the legal
80
00:04:13.785 --> 00:04:15.085
and financial point of view.
81
00:04:15.865 --> 00:04:20.005
And then we're created standard, all of Ohio standard, all
82
00:04:20.005 --> 00:04:23.045
of California standard, all of New Jersey.
83
00:04:23.545 --> 00:04:27.645
And by the way, Exxon was standard oil of New Jersey.
84
00:04:28.345 --> 00:04:30.205
As a matter of fact, the Empire was
85
00:04:30.765 --> 00:04:32.725
absolutely split dismantle,
86
00:04:33.225 --> 00:04:36.045
but what we can observe at the moment is kind
87
00:04:36.045 --> 00:04:38.885
of reconstitution of this empire.
88
00:04:39.455 --> 00:04:41.405
Let's go back a minute on the reserves
89
00:04:41.475 --> 00:04:44.565
because it's going to have a huge impact on the valuation.
90
00:04:45.265 --> 00:04:49.965
Before the hostile takeover of pecans on Gulf Oil,
91
00:04:50.385 --> 00:04:52.365
the companies were just providing
92
00:04:53.085 --> 00:04:55.805
physical communication on their reserves, the number
93
00:04:55.805 --> 00:04:58.845
of barrels, the number of cubic meters of gas,
94
00:04:59.065 --> 00:05:00.085
and so on and so forth.
95
00:05:00.905 --> 00:05:05.405
But the tricky part of the takeover launch by Pickens
96
00:05:05.405 --> 00:05:09.445
and Gulf Oil, it made a bit based on their financial value,
97
00:05:10.125 --> 00:05:11.405
discounted cash flows.
98
00:05:12.185 --> 00:05:15.525
The stock price of Gulf Oil at the very beginning
99
00:05:15.525 --> 00:05:18.085
of the process is about $40 per share.
100
00:05:18.265 --> 00:05:19.325
If you decide only
101
00:05:19.385 --> 00:05:23.285
to extract the oil reserve without investing a dollar in
102
00:05:23.525 --> 00:05:24.965
renewing the reserves,
103
00:05:25.625 --> 00:05:29.965
the value which you get is about 100 plus dollars per share.
104
00:05:30.585 --> 00:05:34.325
So you buy at 40, you extract your cash in
105
00:05:34.545 --> 00:05:38.925
and you make $60 abandoning the company at the end.
106
00:05:39.315 --> 00:05:42.085
This is why after this big financial battle,
107
00:05:42.785 --> 00:05:44.085
the company's in the oil
108
00:05:44.085 --> 00:05:47.365
and gas business started communicating not only about
109
00:05:47.835 --> 00:05:51.965
barrels and cubic meters, but about discounted cash flows.
110
00:05:52.395 --> 00:05:53.965
What is the net present value
111
00:05:53.985 --> 00:05:56.285
of the reserves if we simply extract?
112
00:05:56.785 --> 00:05:59.005
And of course, to calculate a net present value,
113
00:05:59.005 --> 00:06:01.205
you calculate cash flows, but you discount them.
114
00:06:01.545 --> 00:06:03.725
And the weighted average cost of capital, which is used
115
00:06:03.725 --> 00:06:06.765
by ExxonMobil and Chevron today is 10%,
116
00:06:06.975 --> 00:06:08.925
which is normal business practice.
117
00:06:10.105 --> 00:06:12.365
Now, to evaluate a campaign to evaluate business,
118
00:06:12.365 --> 00:06:16.365
to calculate an enterprise value, you have to sum the value
119
00:06:16.365 --> 00:06:19.125
of the existing assets inside the company
120
00:06:19.785 --> 00:06:22.845
and add the present value of what's going to be generated
121
00:06:22.905 --> 00:06:24.165
by the future assets.
122
00:06:24.505 --> 00:06:27.325
The existing assets, very simple, straightforward,
123
00:06:27.675 --> 00:06:30.605
it's about the oil reserves, what about future assets
124
00:06:31.425 --> 00:06:34.725
or it's going to be about new businesses, diversification,
125
00:06:34.905 --> 00:06:36.925
new vertical business segments
126
00:06:36.925 --> 00:06:39.925
and so on so forth, plus the result of future
127
00:06:40.515 --> 00:06:44.205
exploration investment in the renewing of the reserves.
128
00:06:45.065 --> 00:06:47.205
Now, what is interesting in the reserve is
129
00:06:47.205 --> 00:06:50.125
that there is a kind of optional dimension.
130
00:06:50.625 --> 00:06:54.205
The oil reserves are real options.
131
00:06:54.515 --> 00:06:57.325
When you want to calculate value creation,
132
00:06:57.465 --> 00:07:00.005
you calculate a net present value, the present value
133
00:07:00.005 --> 00:07:02.965
of the cash flows net of the CapEx,
134
00:07:02.985 --> 00:07:04.445
the investment and so on and so forth.
135
00:07:05.065 --> 00:07:08.285
But there is another concept in real option thinking,
136
00:07:08.285 --> 00:07:10.605
which is the augmented net present value.
137
00:07:10.755 --> 00:07:14.485
Augmented means that you can add some value just being
138
00:07:14.665 --> 00:07:16.565
clever in management of the project.
139
00:07:17.505 --> 00:07:19.845
In the case of oil reserves, you're not supposed
140
00:07:19.845 --> 00:07:21.005
to extract each
141
00:07:21.005 --> 00:07:23.965
and every day same volume, no, you are going
142
00:07:23.965 --> 00:07:26.525
to adjust the rate, the rhythm of extraction
143
00:07:26.525 --> 00:07:28.445
to changes in market prices.
144
00:07:29.515 --> 00:07:33.365
Very simply, if the oil prices are higher, you accelerate.
145
00:07:33.945 --> 00:07:36.885
If it is lower, well you slow down
146
00:07:37.035 --> 00:07:38.085
because you don't want
147
00:07:38.085 --> 00:07:40.325
to spoil your reserves selling at the low price.
148
00:07:40.385 --> 00:07:44.565
You prefer to maximize your revenues, then you understand
149
00:07:44.565 --> 00:07:46.525
that to evaluate the reserves,
150
00:07:46.795 --> 00:07:51.245
they are very important factors including price
151
00:07:51.265 --> 00:07:55.085
of oil and interest rates, the price for the cashflow,
152
00:07:55.265 --> 00:07:57.205
the interest rate for the wac.
153
00:07:57.535 --> 00:08:01.565
Let's starts with the WAC for the calculation of the wac.
154
00:08:01.565 --> 00:08:04.005
The weighted average cost of capital, ExxonMobil
155
00:08:04.025 --> 00:08:07.005
and Chevron as debt is absolutely negligible.
156
00:08:07.225 --> 00:08:10.285
In both cases, the cost of capital is the cost
157
00:08:10.285 --> 00:08:11.405
of the one unique
158
00:08:11.405 --> 00:08:15.245
and phenomenal financial resources, which is equity.
159
00:08:15.665 --> 00:08:17.245
So it's a cost of equity capital
160
00:08:17.825 --> 00:08:19.845
and then cost of equity capital is supposed
161
00:08:19.845 --> 00:08:23.005
to be 10% using the capital asset pricing model.
162
00:08:23.105 --> 00:08:26.005
The cost of equity is long-term government bond rate plus
163
00:08:26.345 --> 00:08:29.685
the beta systematic risk coefficient multiplied
164
00:08:29.705 --> 00:08:32.085
by the equity market risk premium
165
00:08:32.985 --> 00:08:36.325
equity market risk premium is about 6% in New York stock
166
00:08:36.565 --> 00:08:38.805
exchange and the beta is one
167
00:08:38.805 --> 00:08:40.845
or a little bit more than one for ExxonMobil
168
00:08:40.945 --> 00:08:45.365
and Chevron, roughly 1.5 for Hess
169
00:08:45.625 --> 00:08:48.805
and Pioneer, because they are smaller, there's kind
170
00:08:48.805 --> 00:08:51.445
of premium for the size in the beta,
171
00:08:52.065 --> 00:08:54.525
but what is quite difficult to assess
172
00:08:55.185 --> 00:08:58.445
is which interest rate do we take For the government born
173
00:08:58.445 --> 00:09:01.165
rate today it's about 5.5%,
174
00:09:01.625 --> 00:09:04.005
but a couple of years ago it was close to zero.
175
00:09:04.625 --> 00:09:05.765
And what about tomorrow?
176
00:09:05.955 --> 00:09:09.125
What a kind of long-term perspective for this interest rate.
177
00:09:09.785 --> 00:09:14.085
Now let's make the calculation again, what equals cost
178
00:09:14.085 --> 00:09:15.605
of equity raise premium?
179
00:09:15.905 --> 00:09:17.805
New York Stock Exchange 6%.
180
00:09:18.665 --> 00:09:21.485
If we take 5.5% as a risk-free rate,
181
00:09:21.985 --> 00:09:26.405
the WAC will be 5.5% plus 1.1, a bit more than one
182
00:09:26.965 --> 00:09:29.925
multiplied by 6%, and you get a bit more than 12%.
183
00:09:30.985 --> 00:09:34.685
Now, it should communicate the value of the reserves at 10%
184
00:09:34.905 --> 00:09:36.645
and the cost of capital is 12.
185
00:09:37.515 --> 00:09:39.365
Well, the discount rate is too low,
186
00:09:39.625 --> 00:09:42.445
and in fact you have over evaluated the reserves,
187
00:09:43.385 --> 00:09:45.405
but 5.5 might be a kind
188
00:09:45.405 --> 00:09:48.045
of short term evolution of interest rate.
189
00:09:48.225 --> 00:09:49.445
And what about the long term?
190
00:09:49.465 --> 00:09:53.685
You understand that the objective of the Federal Reserve is
191
00:09:53.685 --> 00:09:55.965
to bring the inflation down to 2%.
192
00:09:57.165 --> 00:09:59.925
Historically, when you observe the bond rates,
193
00:10:00.595 --> 00:10:03.605
it's about inflation plus 1% more
194
00:10:03.605 --> 00:10:06.565
or less, then two plus one is about 3%.
195
00:10:06.625 --> 00:10:11.165
And if you add 1.1 times six to 3%, you get 9.6
196
00:10:11.265 --> 00:10:12.805
and it's quite close to 10%.
197
00:10:13.265 --> 00:10:15.445
Uh, no big deal about the discount rate.
198
00:10:16.665 --> 00:10:19.285
The big question is definitely about the oil price.
199
00:10:20.065 --> 00:10:21.205
If you look at the evolution
200
00:10:21.205 --> 00:10:25.485
of oil prices over the last 20 years, beginning of the 2000,
201
00:10:26.065 --> 00:10:29.685
we are in a range between say 10 and $30.
202
00:10:30.435 --> 00:10:33.165
Then the prices are going to go skyrocketing,
203
00:10:33.345 --> 00:10:35.925
and in the middle of the subprime crisis it's going
204
00:10:35.925 --> 00:10:37.765
to be 140.
205
00:10:37.915 --> 00:10:40.645
Then there is a massive drop, and they zip again
206
00:10:40.705 --> 00:10:44.725
and back down and down to $20 in 2020
207
00:10:45.465 --> 00:10:47.325
and then up to 110.
208
00:10:47.345 --> 00:10:49.165
And it seems to be quite stabilized
209
00:10:49.425 --> 00:10:52.645
around 80, 81, 80 $2.
210
00:10:53.625 --> 00:10:56.285
Of course, I'm not going to make any forecast on the future
211
00:10:56.385 --> 00:10:58.405
of the oil prices, but what's interesting is
212
00:10:58.405 --> 00:11:01.685
to observe the last two years, it's about $80 at the end
213
00:11:01.685 --> 00:11:05.845
of 2022, when the companies are producing the annual report.
214
00:11:06.355 --> 00:11:07.645
It's about the same today.
215
00:11:07.945 --> 00:11:10.965
So there is no significant change between 2022 and today,
216
00:11:11.545 --> 00:11:15.565
but there is a very significant increase from 20 20, 20 21
217
00:11:15.665 --> 00:11:16.685
to 2022,
218
00:11:16.705 --> 00:11:19.485
and this shows in the value of the reserves,
219
00:11:19.495 --> 00:11:22.525
which is produced and communicated by these two companies.
220
00:11:22.935 --> 00:11:24.845
Let's start with ExxonMobile.
221
00:11:25.345 --> 00:11:27.685
The value of the reserves for ExxonMobil
222
00:11:27.705 --> 00:11:32.605
as it shows in the annual report 2021 is $153 billion.
223
00:11:32.995 --> 00:11:37.685
It's going to go up to 259 in 2022.
224
00:11:37.685 --> 00:11:41.605
It's an increase by 69% pioneer.
225
00:11:42.355 --> 00:11:47.125
It's a lower value of course, but the growth rate is 36%.
226
00:11:47.355 --> 00:11:51.205
Chevron, 64%, the same as ExxonMobil
227
00:11:51.205 --> 00:11:52.445
and private for the same reasons.
228
00:11:52.745 --> 00:11:53.805
And what about Hess?
229
00:11:53.995 --> 00:11:57.645
Hess, it's going to move up from 11 to 21.
230
00:11:57.795 --> 00:12:02.605
It's an increase by 91%, so it's a dramatic increase.
231
00:12:02.785 --> 00:12:04.765
Why not because of interest rate?
232
00:12:04.795 --> 00:12:05.925
It's a dramatic increase
233
00:12:05.925 --> 00:12:08.005
because of increase in the price of oil.
234
00:12:08.545 --> 00:12:10.565
But what is very interesting now's
235
00:12:10.565 --> 00:12:13.205
to relay the enterprise value of the companies
236
00:12:13.865 --> 00:12:15.565
and the value of their reserves.
237
00:12:16.545 --> 00:12:19.765
For ExxonMobil, the enterprise value today is about
238
00:12:19.795 --> 00:12:21.525
435 billion
239
00:12:22.585 --> 00:12:25.285
and the value of the reserves is 259.
240
00:12:25.385 --> 00:12:29.925
So enterprise value divided by value of the reserves is 1.7,
241
00:12:30.255 --> 00:12:34.405
which basically means that $100 is due to the reserves,
242
00:12:34.405 --> 00:12:38.765
and $70 is due to future assets in a calculation
243
00:12:38.825 --> 00:12:40.605
of the total value of the company.
244
00:12:41.585 --> 00:12:44.365
The same indicator enterprise value divided by value
245
00:12:44.365 --> 00:12:48.445
of reserves is 1.6 for Pioneer, quite the same as ExxonMobil
246
00:12:48.905 --> 00:12:51.525
for Chevron's 1.4 a bit less,
247
00:12:51.585 --> 00:12:54.285
and for S it's 2.5.
248
00:12:54.985 --> 00:12:59.445
So Chevron is paying $52 billion to buy 21 billion
249
00:12:59.745 --> 00:13:03.045
of reserves and 31 billion of
250
00:13:03.755 --> 00:13:06.005
something which is not identified today.
251
00:13:06.395 --> 00:13:10.485
This is very likely one of the reasons why Chevron is going
252
00:13:10.485 --> 00:13:12.845
to be very much penalized by capital markets.
253
00:13:13.675 --> 00:13:16.525
Financial markets are to say the least, quite
254
00:13:17.045 --> 00:13:18.565
skeptical about value creation.
255
00:13:19.505 --> 00:13:21.725
And what's interesting to observe is that Shell
256
00:13:21.865 --> 00:13:24.885
and British Petroleum, they are not going to move at all.
257
00:13:25.275 --> 00:13:28.005
They are going to say, we are not going to follow the crowd.
258
00:13:28.625 --> 00:13:30.605
We manage our existing assets.
259
00:13:31.025 --> 00:13:34.125
We don't want to enter this kind of acquisition game,
260
00:13:34.415 --> 00:13:35.845
which is destroying value.
261
00:13:36.915 --> 00:13:38.565
That was about the financial metrics.
262
00:13:38.705 --> 00:13:41.805
Now let's move to the other item, which is quite important,
263
00:13:42.195 --> 00:13:43.485
economy, governance.
264
00:13:44.385 --> 00:13:46.805
In fact, when you see all these companies in the oil
265
00:13:46.805 --> 00:13:49.045
and gas industry, which are growing and growing
266
00:13:49.145 --> 00:13:52.405
and growing, it's a kind of return to standard oil.
267
00:13:52.945 --> 00:13:55.645
Of course, you don't return fully to standard oil
268
00:13:55.645 --> 00:13:58.845
because it would be absolutely unsinkable
269
00:13:58.845 --> 00:14:02.525
to consider a new standard, always this power and size,
270
00:14:03.225 --> 00:14:05.925
but it is a reconstitution of the empire.
271
00:14:07.035 --> 00:14:09.565
It's very interesting to observe business economics
272
00:14:09.565 --> 00:14:11.565
and the evolution of industry organization
273
00:14:11.625 --> 00:14:12.685
In the United States.
274
00:14:13.345 --> 00:14:15.845
You very often start from monopolies,
275
00:14:15.955 --> 00:14:18.565
then you fragment the monopolies, you split the monopolies,
276
00:14:18.905 --> 00:14:22.885
and then little by little there will be a change
277
00:14:23.225 --> 00:14:26.645
and you get back to a kind of restricted, oligo,
278
00:14:26.645 --> 00:14:29.005
poly American telephone.
279
00:14:29.005 --> 00:14:31.045
And Telegraph was the one
280
00:14:31.145 --> 00:14:33.405
and unique company operating in
281
00:14:33.425 --> 00:14:35.285
as a telecommunication operators
282
00:14:35.305 --> 00:14:36.485
at the beginning of the eighties.
283
00:14:36.875 --> 00:14:37.965
Then there is a split,
284
00:14:38.705 --> 00:14:42.165
and these company is split into the regional Bell operating
285
00:14:42.165 --> 00:14:46.525
company, and then progressively, little by little the new at
286
00:14:46.545 --> 00:14:49.005
and t, much smaller than the initial one is
287
00:14:49.005 --> 00:14:50.125
going to grow again.
288
00:14:50.655 --> 00:14:53.325
There will be another player in the game whose name is
289
00:14:53.555 --> 00:14:56.605
Verizon, very big player in mobile business.
290
00:14:56.895 --> 00:14:59.925
Third one, which is smaller, but growing by merger
291
00:15:00.025 --> 00:15:02.045
and acquisition, whose name is Sprint.
292
00:15:02.745 --> 00:15:04.965
And then you understand that you have a very limited number
293
00:15:04.965 --> 00:15:07.205
of players for a very big market.
294
00:15:08.155 --> 00:15:10.925
What is the impact on the quality?
295
00:15:11.075 --> 00:15:12.845
What is the impact on the prices?
296
00:15:13.395 --> 00:15:15.005
What is impact on the quality
297
00:15:15.145 --> 00:15:17.205
and the diversity of services which are
298
00:15:17.205 --> 00:15:18.365
offered to the customers?
299
00:15:19.145 --> 00:15:21.325
You understand that with a limited number of player,
300
00:15:21.585 --> 00:15:25.845
it looks like a kind of gentleman sport rather than
301
00:15:26.885 --> 00:15:28.365
TAF competition so
302
00:15:28.445 --> 00:15:30.965
that you can create more value for the customers.
303
00:15:31.355 --> 00:15:34.205
Same story for the island gas industry.
304
00:15:34.785 --> 00:15:36.605
You start with standard oil
305
00:15:36.745 --> 00:15:39.885
and then progressively you create a picture
306
00:15:40.025 --> 00:15:42.085
of restricted oligopoly.
307
00:15:42.235 --> 00:15:45.325
Obviously, this has an impact on the intensity
308
00:15:45.545 --> 00:15:48.605
of competition and value creation for the customers,
309
00:15:48.625 --> 00:15:51.685
but this also has an impact on lobbying.
310
00:15:52.535 --> 00:15:54.485
There is a very limited number
311
00:15:54.625 --> 00:15:59.525
of actors in the fossil energy business in North America,
312
00:16:00.225 --> 00:16:02.045
and their power is very big.
313
00:16:02.255 --> 00:16:05.525
Their financial power is increasing.
314
00:16:06.825 --> 00:16:10.725
Now you understand that fossil energy is subject
315
00:16:10.725 --> 00:16:13.325
to negotiations, regulations
316
00:16:13.435 --> 00:16:16.245
because of their impact on climate change,
317
00:16:17.385 --> 00:16:20.245
but all these campuses are contributing to the financing
318
00:16:20.245 --> 00:16:21.565
of political parties.
319
00:16:22.105 --> 00:16:25.565
So they are quite strong in some decisions which are going
320
00:16:25.565 --> 00:16:29.205
to be taken by actors, by the lawmakers.
321
00:16:29.665 --> 00:16:31.605
So definitely in terms of low being
322
00:16:31.755 --> 00:16:34.485
what is currently happening has an impact on
323
00:16:34.635 --> 00:16:35.765
political decisions.
324
00:16:36.305 --> 00:16:38.645
It has an impact on climate change
325
00:16:39.025 --> 00:16:42.045
and a management of energy transition.
326
00:16:42.635 --> 00:16:46.405
This issue is so big that the New York Times decided to
327
00:16:47.055 --> 00:16:48.685
offer as a main title.
328
00:16:49.485 --> 00:16:51.645
ExxonMobil's Pioneer acquisition
329
00:16:52.585 --> 00:16:54.565
is a direct threat to democracy.
330
00:16:54.835 --> 00:16:56.925
This is a very violent statement,
331
00:16:56.925 --> 00:17:00.925
very brutal statement dated October, the eighteens.
332
00:17:01.555 --> 00:17:04.165
This is obviously linked with the fact that lobbying is
333
00:17:04.185 --> 00:17:08.445
so important for lawmakers and business operations.
334
00:17:09.425 --> 00:17:11.205
Now, behind that, there is a little bit
335
00:17:11.205 --> 00:17:15.205
of economic thinking, liberalism and competition.
336
00:17:15.225 --> 00:17:18.725
It has always been a very important economy issue,
337
00:17:19.205 --> 00:17:20.645
a very big economic subject.
338
00:17:21.305 --> 00:17:22.805
One of my favorite economies,
339
00:17:22.805 --> 00:17:27.125
maybe my favorite economist is Adam Smith, who was living
340
00:17:27.185 --> 00:17:29.205
during the 18th century.
341
00:17:29.785 --> 00:17:32.765
He was an economist, but he was also a moralist.
342
00:17:33.665 --> 00:17:36.005
Of course, people in charge of free trade
343
00:17:36.185 --> 00:17:40.205
and very tough liberalism, they all say he was in favor
344
00:17:40.385 --> 00:17:42.125
of the invisible hand.
345
00:17:42.345 --> 00:17:45.085
The invisible hand means that there will be a kind
346
00:17:45.085 --> 00:17:49.365
of stabilization of the market and it's supposed to be good.
347
00:17:50.225 --> 00:17:52.045
Now, at MPS used to take the example
348
00:17:52.045 --> 00:17:54.165
of the baker and the government.
349
00:17:54.855 --> 00:17:56.885
There are different kinds of bakers.
350
00:17:57.345 --> 00:17:59.125
The ones who produce good bread
351
00:17:59.545 --> 00:18:01.365
and the ones who produce bad bread.
352
00:18:01.705 --> 00:18:04.205
The government is not in charge of making the split.
353
00:18:04.785 --> 00:18:07.885
The government is not in charge of telling you how you have
354
00:18:07.885 --> 00:18:11.165
to produce, manufacture, and sell your bread.
355
00:18:11.595 --> 00:18:13.805
Then the market, the invisible hand,
356
00:18:13.895 --> 00:18:16.445
which is basically the customer will makes a difference
357
00:18:16.445 --> 00:18:18.125
between the good and the bad baker.
358
00:18:18.825 --> 00:18:21.645
The bad will disappear and the good will remain,
359
00:18:22.305 --> 00:18:26.645
but the invisible hand is not supposed to manage everything.
360
00:18:27.145 --> 00:18:30.405
Of course, each and every subject, which is relevant
361
00:18:30.405 --> 00:18:31.925
for the sovereignty of the country,
362
00:18:32.425 --> 00:18:33.765
is dealt by the government.
363
00:18:34.435 --> 00:18:37.325
It's about the army, it's about, uh, the police,
364
00:18:37.955 --> 00:18:39.525
it's about the justice.
365
00:18:40.025 --> 00:18:42.605
But this is very classical and traditional list.
366
00:18:42.675 --> 00:18:47.485
Adam Smith was adding education, health, and infrastructure.
367
00:18:48.635 --> 00:18:51.685
Education should be accessible to each
368
00:18:51.825 --> 00:18:53.725
and every person in the country.
369
00:18:54.225 --> 00:18:57.005
It should be affordable on a financial point of view.
370
00:18:57.465 --> 00:19:01.365
Health, exactly the same, accessible to everybody,
371
00:19:01.615 --> 00:19:02.925
affordable to everybody.
372
00:19:03.395 --> 00:19:04.845
Last but not least, the quality
373
00:19:04.945 --> 00:19:07.885
of the infrastructure is going to improve the efficiency
374
00:19:08.185 --> 00:19:10.045
of the economic life of the country.
375
00:19:10.785 --> 00:19:15.485
But a very important point, Adam Smith was extremely afraid
376
00:19:15.665 --> 00:19:19.325
of what he was naming the large corporations,
377
00:19:20.335 --> 00:19:23.685
these corporations which have a tendency to grow
378
00:19:24.025 --> 00:19:27.485
and to grow, to gain in power, to gain in influence,
379
00:19:27.625 --> 00:19:30.005
and to influence the decisions made
380
00:19:30.005 --> 00:19:32.085
by the lawmakers and the governments.
381
00:19:32.585 --> 00:19:35.965
It was very much afraid that large corporations
382
00:19:36.875 --> 00:19:38.525
destroy competition
383
00:19:39.265 --> 00:19:43.925
and impose their lobbying power to the lawmakers again.
384
00:19:44.385 --> 00:19:47.885
So you understand that Adam Smith had a very clear vision
385
00:19:48.015 --> 00:19:50.645
about the dangers, the threats
386
00:19:51.265 --> 00:19:53.165
of the evolution of liberalism.
387
00:19:53.705 --> 00:19:57.285
Now, you can take two perspectives on his operations.
388
00:19:58.245 --> 00:19:59.765
A perspective is about shareholders.
389
00:19:59.915 --> 00:20:02.445
What about value for the shareholders? Oh, it's great.
390
00:20:02.925 --> 00:20:06.365
A loss in value, a value distraction
391
00:20:06.665 --> 00:20:08.365
of $50 billion.
392
00:20:09.255 --> 00:20:12.805
Stock price, market cap evaporated in the sky.
393
00:20:13.465 --> 00:20:15.285
So as far as financial markets are
394
00:20:15.285 --> 00:20:16.605
concerned, this is no good news.
395
00:20:16.635 --> 00:20:20.005
What about the economic and ecological environment?
396
00:20:20.315 --> 00:20:22.725
There's a very, very big question mark,
397
00:20:23.395 --> 00:20:24.965
because when you create
398
00:20:25.385 --> 00:20:29.205
or recreate these large, big corporations,
399
00:20:29.875 --> 00:20:32.525
it's at the expense of economic efficiency
400
00:20:32.985 --> 00:20:35.965
and it is probably something at the detriment
401
00:20:36.025 --> 00:20:39.565
of the sustainability of the planet as far
402
00:20:39.565 --> 00:20:41.285
as climate change is concerned.
403
00:20:41.965 --> 00:20:44.775
A very big question mark. Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast, which is dedicated to the wave of oil acquisitions currently observed in the United States.
We will discuss some financial metrics around the valuation of reserves, but also turn our attention to the probable consequences of these operations on the economic governance of the country.
A few announcements to start with.
A few days ago, the 23rd of October, 2023, Chevron announces buying Hess for 53 billion US dollars.
It's an all stock transaction.
It's paid in shares, not a dollar of cash out.
A few days before the 11th of October, ExxonMobile announced buying Pioneer Natural Resources for $60 billion again, paid in shares.
Both are all stock transactions.
When you observe the evolutions as stock prices, it's absolutely clear that the capital markets don't like these operations.
When ExxonMobil makes the announcement, the stock price is down by 4.1%.
When Chevron makes its own announcement a few days later, the stock price is immediately down by 5.5%, then it's going to stabilize more or less, and then there's another drop by 7%.
So definitely capital markets don't appreciate very much these strategies.
ExxonMobil and Chevron belongs to the same industry, oil and gas, and they don't share only that.
They also share their financial strategy.
Low debt, marginal debt, equity, finance companies returning cash to shareholders, uh, massive dividend growing dividend and also massive share buybacks.
As far as ExxonMobil is concerned.
In 2022, the company paid a dividend of $15 billion and bought back its shares for another 15 billion.
So you return $30 billion to the shareholders.
Chevron 2022 dividend, 11 billion shares buyback five billions.
So these returns to the shareholders are quite significant.
Let's start with a little bit of history.
Chevron is a result of the merger between standard of California and Gulf Oil, which happened in the mid eighties.
This is one of my favorite studies and this is why in February, 2020, I produced AT cast on T-Bone Pickens, who had passed away, uh, shortly before, and Pickens was more or less the initiat of the merger between SoCal and Girl fod because he tried to make a takeover.
Horse style takeover on girl foil, I think observed that the value of the oil reserves was significantly more than the enterprise value than what you do.
You buy the company, you extract, you produce, you generate revenues out of that, and for the rest of it you simply abandon and you cash in the value of the reserves.
But I have to add some additional historical comment about what happened before.
Before standard dollar of California, it was standard dollar with a very, um, I would say specific gentleman whose name was John Davidson, Rockefeller.
Rockefeller was obsessed by customers quality pricing services and so on and so forth.
So he wanted to create value for the customers, but at the determined at the expense of the value and the relationship with the stakeholders.
In fact, the business practices of standard oil with uh, the partners, with the suppliers, with the competitors were absolutely questionable, very much criticized.
And at the end of the day, the Court of Justice decided that there should be a stock split.
It was implemented in 1911 and there was a dissolution of the 31 firms, which these 31 firms became autonomous on the legal and financial point of view.
And then we're created standard, all of Ohio standard, all of California standard, all of New Jersey.
And by the way, Exxon was standard oil of New Jersey.
As a matter of fact, the Empire was absolutely split dismantle, but what we can observe at the moment is kind of reconstitution of this empire.
Let's go back a minute on the reserves because it's going to have a huge impact on the valuation.
Before the hostile takeover of pecans on Gulf Oil, the companies were just providing physical communication on their reserves, the number of barrels, the number of cubic meters of gas, and so on and so forth.
But the tricky part of the takeover launch by Pickens and Gulf Oil, it made a bit based on their financial value, discounted cash flows.
The stock price of Gulf Oil at the very beginning of the process is about $40 per share.
If you decide only to extract the oil reserve without investing a dollar in renewing the reserves, the value which you get is about 100 plus dollars per share.
So you buy at 40, you extract your cash in and you make $60 abandoning the company at the end.
This is why after this big financial battle, the company's in the oil and gas business started communicating not only about barrels and cubic meters, but about discounted cash flows.
What is the net present value of the reserves if we simply extract? And of course, to calculate a net present value, you calculate cash flows, but you discount them.
And the weighted average cost of capital, which is used by ExxonMobil and Chevron today is 10%, which is normal business practice.
Now, to evaluate a campaign to evaluate business, to calculate an enterprise value, you have to sum the value of the existing assets inside the company and add the present value of what's going to be generated by the future assets.
The existing assets, very simple, straightforward, it's about the oil reserves, what about future assets or it's going to be about new businesses, diversification, new vertical business segments and so on so forth, plus the result of future exploration investment in the renewing of the reserves.
Now, what is interesting in the reserve is that there is a kind of optional dimension.
The oil reserves are real options.
When you want to calculate value creation, you calculate a net present value, the present value of the cash flows net of the CapEx, the investment and so on and so forth.
But there is another concept in real option thinking, which is the augmented net present value.
Augmented means that you can add some value just being clever in management of the project.
In the case of oil reserves, you're not supposed to extract each and every day same volume, no, you are going to adjust the rate, the rhythm of extraction to changes in market prices.
Very simply, if the oil prices are higher, you accelerate.
If it is lower, well you slow down because you don't want to spoil your reserves selling at the low price.
You prefer to maximize your revenues, then you understand that to evaluate the reserves, they are very important factors including price of oil and interest rates, the price for the cashflow, the interest rate for the wac.
Let's starts with the WAC for the calculation of the wac.
The weighted average cost of capital, ExxonMobil and Chevron as debt is absolutely negligible.
In both cases, the cost of capital is the cost of the one unique and phenomenal financial resources, which is equity.
So it's a cost of equity capital and then cost of equity capital is supposed to be 10% using the capital asset pricing model.
The cost of equity is long-term government bond rate plus the beta systematic risk coefficient multiplied by the equity market risk premium equity market risk premium is about 6% in New York stock exchange and the beta is one or a little bit more than one for ExxonMobil and Chevron, roughly 1.5 for Hess and Pioneer, because they are smaller, there's kind of premium for the size in the beta, but what is quite difficult to assess is which interest rate do we take For the government born rate today it's about 5.5%, but a couple of years ago it was close to zero.
And what about tomorrow? What a kind of long-term perspective for this interest rate.
Now let's make the calculation again, what equals cost of equity raise premium? New York Stock Exchange 6%.
If we take 5.5% as a risk-free rate, the WAC will be 5.5% plus 1.1, a bit more than one multiplied by 6%, and you get a bit more than 12%.
Now, it should communicate the value of the reserves at 10% and the cost of capital is 12.
Well, the discount rate is too low, and in fact you have over evaluated the reserves, but 5.5 might be a kind of short term evolution of interest rate.
And what about the long term? You understand that the objective of the Federal Reserve is to bring the inflation down to 2%.
Historically, when you observe the bond rates, it's about inflation plus 1% more or less, then two plus one is about 3%.
And if you add 1.1 times six to 3%, you get 9.6 and it's quite close to 10%.
Uh, no big deal about the discount rate.
The big question is definitely about the oil price.
If you look at the evolution of oil prices over the last 20 years, beginning of the 2000, we are in a range between say 10 and $30.
Then the prices are going to go skyrocketing, and in the middle of the subprime crisis it's going to be 140.
Then there is a massive drop, and they zip again and back down and down to $20 in 2020 and then up to 110.
And it seems to be quite stabilized around 80, 81, 80 $2.
Of course, I'm not going to make any forecast on the future of the oil prices, but what's interesting is to observe the last two years, it's about $80 at the end of 2022, when the companies are producing the annual report.
It's about the same today.
So there is no significant change between 2022 and today, but there is a very significant increase from 20 20, 20 21 to 2022, and this shows in the value of the reserves, which is produced and communicated by these two companies.
Let's start with ExxonMobile.
The value of the reserves for ExxonMobil as it shows in the annual report 2021 is $153 billion.
It's going to go up to 259 in 2022.
It's an increase by 69% pioneer.
It's a lower value of course, but the growth rate is 36%.
Chevron, 64%, the same as ExxonMobil and private for the same reasons.
And what about Hess? Hess, it's going to move up from 11 to 21.
It's an increase by 91%, so it's a dramatic increase.
Why not because of interest rate? It's a dramatic increase because of increase in the price of oil.
But what is very interesting now's to relay the enterprise value of the companies and the value of their reserves.
For ExxonMobil, the enterprise value today is about 435 billion and the value of the reserves is 259.
So enterprise value divided by value of the reserves is 1.7, which basically means that $100 is due to the reserves, and $70 is due to future assets in a calculation of the total value of the company.
The same indicator enterprise value divided by value of reserves is 1.6 for Pioneer, quite the same as ExxonMobil for Chevron's 1.4 a bit less, and for S it's 2.5.
So Chevron is paying $52 billion to buy 21 billion of reserves and 31 billion of something which is not identified today.
This is very likely one of the reasons why Chevron is going to be very much penalized by capital markets.
Financial markets are to say the least, quite skeptical about value creation.
And what's interesting to observe is that Shell and British Petroleum, they are not going to move at all.
They are going to say, we are not going to follow the crowd.
We manage our existing assets.
We don't want to enter this kind of acquisition game, which is destroying value.
That was about the financial metrics.
Now let's move to the other item, which is quite important, economy, governance.
In fact, when you see all these companies in the oil and gas industry, which are growing and growing and growing, it's a kind of return to standard oil.
Of course, you don't return fully to standard oil because it would be absolutely unsinkable to consider a new standard, always this power and size, but it is a reconstitution of the empire.
It's very interesting to observe business economics and the evolution of industry organization In the United States.
You very often start from monopolies, then you fragment the monopolies, you split the monopolies, and then little by little there will be a change and you get back to a kind of restricted, oligo, poly American telephone.
And Telegraph was the one and unique company operating in as a telecommunication operators at the beginning of the eighties.
Then there is a split, and these company is split into the regional Bell operating company, and then progressively, little by little the new at and t, much smaller than the initial one is going to grow again.
There will be another player in the game whose name is Verizon, very big player in mobile business.
Third one, which is smaller, but growing by merger and acquisition, whose name is Sprint.
And then you understand that you have a very limited number of players for a very big market.
What is the impact on the quality? What is the impact on the prices? What is impact on the quality and the diversity of services which are offered to the customers? You understand that with a limited number of player, it looks like a kind of gentleman sport rather than TAF competition so that you can create more value for the customers.
Same story for the island gas industry.
You start with standard oil and then progressively you create a picture of restricted oligopoly.
Obviously, this has an impact on the intensity of competition and value creation for the customers, but this also has an impact on lobbying.
There is a very limited number of actors in the fossil energy business in North America, and their power is very big.
Their financial power is increasing.
Now you understand that fossil energy is subject to negotiations, regulations because of their impact on climate change, but all these campuses are contributing to the financing of political parties.
So they are quite strong in some decisions which are going to be taken by actors, by the lawmakers.
So definitely in terms of low being what is currently happening has an impact on political decisions.
It has an impact on climate change and a management of energy transition.
This issue is so big that the New York Times decided to offer as a main title.
ExxonMobil's Pioneer acquisition is a direct threat to democracy.
This is a very violent statement, very brutal statement dated October, the eighteens.
This is obviously linked with the fact that lobbying is so important for lawmakers and business operations.
Now, behind that, there is a little bit of economic thinking, liberalism and competition.
It has always been a very important economy issue, a very big economic subject.
One of my favorite economies, maybe my favorite economist is Adam Smith, who was living during the 18th century.
He was an economist, but he was also a moralist.
Of course, people in charge of free trade and very tough liberalism, they all say he was in favor of the invisible hand.
The invisible hand means that there will be a kind of stabilization of the market and it's supposed to be good.
Now, at MPS used to take the example of the baker and the government.
There are different kinds of bakers.
The ones who produce good bread and the ones who produce bad bread.
The government is not in charge of making the split.
The government is not in charge of telling you how you have to produce, manufacture, and sell your bread.
Then the market, the invisible hand, which is basically the customer will makes a difference between the good and the bad baker.
The bad will disappear and the good will remain, but the invisible hand is not supposed to manage everything.
Of course, each and every subject, which is relevant for the sovereignty of the country, is dealt by the government.
It's about the army, it's about, uh, the police, it's about the justice.
But this is very classical and traditional list.
Adam Smith was adding education, health, and infrastructure.
Education should be accessible to each and every person in the country.
It should be affordable on a financial point of view.
Health, exactly the same, accessible to everybody, affordable to everybody.
Last but not least, the quality of the infrastructure is going to improve the efficiency of the economic life of the country.
But a very important point, Adam Smith was extremely afraid of what he was naming the large corporations, these corporations which have a tendency to grow and to grow, to gain in power, to gain in influence, and to influence the decisions made by the lawmakers and the governments.
It was very much afraid that large corporations destroy competition and impose their lobbying power to the lawmakers again.
So you understand that Adam Smith had a very clear vision about the dangers, the threats of the evolution of liberalism.
Now, you can take two perspectives on his operations.
A perspective is about shareholders.
What about value for the shareholders? Oh, it's great.
A loss in value, a value distraction of $50 billion.
Stock price, market cap evaporated in the sky.
So as far as financial markets are concerned, this is no good news.
What about the economic and ecological environment? There's a very, very big question mark, because when you create or recreate these large, big corporations, it's at the expense of economic efficiency and it is probably something at the detriment of the sustainability of the planet as far as climate change is concerned.
A very big question mark.
Thank you very much.