November 2024 Vidcast // Pixar : A good moment to sell ?
An analysis of a major Disney partner
Professor Jacquet analyses the case of the American film company Pixar and questions the wisdom of putting it up for sale at this time.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:08.255 --> 00:00:12.425
Welcome to this Vidcast, which is devoted to Pixar,
2
00:00:12.505 --> 00:00:16.825
a company whose creativity in animation films has been a
3
00:00:16.825 --> 00:00:21.065
source of so many dreams for such a diverse public.
4
00:00:21.885 --> 00:00:25.905
We are going to concentrate on the year 2006 when the
5
00:00:25.905 --> 00:00:27.625
company is acquired by Disney.
6
00:00:28.605 --> 00:00:32.145
As far as shareholders are concerned, Pixar shareholders,
7
00:00:32.485 --> 00:00:34.305
was it the right moment for sale?
8
00:00:36.495 --> 00:00:39.185
Obviously, Pixar represented a disruption,
9
00:00:39.385 --> 00:00:42.705
a main disruption in the animation film industry.
10
00:00:43.565 --> 00:00:47.585
For Steve Jobs, it was the best financial investment ever
11
00:00:47.965 --> 00:00:51.385
and Steve Jobs made much more money with Pixar than
12
00:00:51.385 --> 00:00:55.305
with Apple and for Disney it was a turnaround,
13
00:00:55.805 --> 00:00:58.185
the opportunity for a revival,
14
00:00:58.185 --> 00:01:00.705
which was absolutely crucial for the company.
15
00:01:02.245 --> 00:01:05.915
Let's go back to the early years of Pixar. At the beginning.
16
00:01:05.925 --> 00:01:09.675
There is an outstanding director, George Lucas
17
00:01:10.055 --> 00:01:13.435
and George Lucas is going to create his own company,
18
00:01:13.995 --> 00:01:16.315
Lucas Film, to produce his own films.
19
00:01:17.375 --> 00:01:21.995
Inside Lucas's film is going to create in 1979 the computer
20
00:01:22.635 --> 00:01:23.635
graphics group.
21
00:01:24.335 --> 00:01:28.195
The objective is to create visual effects for films such
22
00:01:28.195 --> 00:01:29.235
as Star Wars.
23
00:01:29.945 --> 00:01:33.315
He's going to invite pioneers to join the venture,
24
00:01:33.985 --> 00:01:35.035
including Dr.
25
00:01:35.475 --> 00:01:38.955
Edwin Kamal, who is a genius in computer science.
26
00:01:39.545 --> 00:01:43.075
He's going to receive plenty of prestigious awards such
27
00:01:43.075 --> 00:01:46.035
as John Neuman and the Touring Awards,
28
00:01:46.575 --> 00:01:48.355
and his career will end as a president
29
00:01:48.355 --> 00:01:51.035
of Wal Disney Animation Studios.
30
00:01:52.695 --> 00:01:54.355
At a certain moment in time,
31
00:01:54.565 --> 00:01:57.195
there will be a certain actor showing on stage.
32
00:01:58.175 --> 00:02:03.035
In May, 1985, Steve Jobs ousted from Apple.
33
00:02:03.655 --> 00:02:05.715
He was more or less forced to resign
34
00:02:05.715 --> 00:02:10.275
after a conflict with John Sculley hired by Steve Jobs
35
00:02:10.895 --> 00:02:14.235
and Conflict, which is confirmed with the board of directors
36
00:02:14.235 --> 00:02:16.915
of Apple Co-founded by Steve Jobs
37
00:02:17.495 --> 00:02:19.715
and Steve Wozniak at that time.
38
00:02:19.715 --> 00:02:24.435
Steve Jobs sells all of his 11% shares of Apple,
39
00:02:24.825 --> 00:02:27.155
excluding one share to be invited
40
00:02:27.295 --> 00:02:28.355
for the shareholders meeting,
41
00:02:29.415 --> 00:02:32.835
and it's not quite sure how much he got out of that,
42
00:02:32.975 --> 00:02:37.395
but some estimations are about $130 million.
43
00:02:37.625 --> 00:02:39.595
What did he do with the money it created?
44
00:02:40.385 --> 00:02:44.275
Next, the next adventure, the objective is
45
00:02:44.275 --> 00:02:47.715
to defeat Apple to take his revenge against Apple.
46
00:02:48.375 --> 00:02:49.795
The computers created
47
00:02:49.975 --> 00:02:52.995
and produced by Next are not going to be a massive success,
48
00:02:53.095 --> 00:02:56.635
but the operating system, which is based on Unix, is going
49
00:02:56.635 --> 00:02:57.635
to be a great success
50
00:02:58.095 --> 00:03:02.205
and when next later on is bought by Apple, it's going
51
00:03:02.205 --> 00:03:04.245
to be Mac OSX.
52
00:03:06.505 --> 00:03:07.965
The second investment made
53
00:03:07.985 --> 00:03:10.605
by Steve Jobs is an investment in Pixar.
54
00:03:11.455 --> 00:03:14.285
Steve Jobs first makes an offer, which is rejected
55
00:03:14.505 --> 00:03:17.365
by the management of the company.
56
00:03:18.035 --> 00:03:21.005
Then the management tries to find another investor
57
00:03:21.635 --> 00:03:24.285
they don't find and then they go back to Steve Jobs
58
00:03:24.585 --> 00:03:25.605
who accepts the offer.
59
00:03:26.275 --> 00:03:28.125
He's going to be paid $1 per month.
60
00:03:28.475 --> 00:03:30.485
He's going to invest $5 million
61
00:03:30.585 --> 00:03:32.845
to buy the computer graphics groups,
62
00:03:33.265 --> 00:03:36.685
and he's going to inject an additional 5 million to pay
63
00:03:36.685 --> 00:03:38.805
for the losses and create some
64
00:03:39.445 --> 00:03:40.565
invested capital in the company,
65
00:03:40.565 --> 00:03:43.645
which is renamed Pixar Animation Studios.
66
00:03:44.395 --> 00:03:48.205
What is of first interest for Steve Jobs is
67
00:03:48.205 --> 00:03:52.725
that Pixar is selling a Pixar, an image computer,
68
00:03:53.465 --> 00:03:57.525
and the objective of Steve Jobs is to fight against Apple.
69
00:03:58.095 --> 00:04:00.405
Again, the revenge against Apple.
70
00:04:01.065 --> 00:04:05.565
The copywriter is sold for just $135,000
71
00:04:05.945 --> 00:04:09.765
at that time, to which you have to add $35 for the software,
72
00:04:09.765 --> 00:04:12.925
which is acquired on both from Sun Systems.
73
00:04:13.425 --> 00:04:15.725
That's quite a high amount of money
74
00:04:16.105 --> 00:04:18.765
and it's going to be a complete commercial disaster.
75
00:04:18.955 --> 00:04:21.445
They're going to sell less than 300 units.
76
00:04:21.585 --> 00:04:24.725
Of course, if you compare that with Apple One,
77
00:04:25.135 --> 00:04:28.845
which had been sold 175 times, it looks better,
78
00:04:29.225 --> 00:04:32.245
but Apple two, which followed Apple one,
79
00:04:32.825 --> 00:04:36.245
was sold at the level of 6 million units,
80
00:04:36.375 --> 00:04:38.005
which is a quite different story.
81
00:04:39.425 --> 00:04:42.725
In the meantime, there is a third actor who's working hard.
82
00:04:43.075 --> 00:04:47.965
John Lasseter, whose creativity is outstanding, is using
83
00:04:48.145 --> 00:04:51.045
and capitalizing on the right software, which was developed
84
00:04:51.145 --> 00:04:55.765
by Pixar to produce very successful animated shortcuts
85
00:04:56.265 --> 00:04:59.005
who are going to receive recognition from the industry
86
00:04:59.035 --> 00:05:01.165
with a nomination at the Huska.
87
00:05:02.155 --> 00:05:04.485
John Lasseter also has good ties with Disney,
88
00:05:04.865 --> 00:05:06.605
and thanks to that they are going
89
00:05:06.605 --> 00:05:09.485
to sign a partnership in 1991
90
00:05:10.295 --> 00:05:12.845
about producing films distributed by Disney.
91
00:05:13.665 --> 00:05:16.005
The rest of the stories are going to be a succession
92
00:05:16.005 --> 00:05:20.445
of tensions, conflicts, terrible meanings, insults,
93
00:05:20.465 --> 00:05:22.485
and so on and so forth, and after four
94
00:05:22.485 --> 00:05:25.125
and a half years of hard work
95
00:05:25.385 --> 00:05:30.325
and difficulties, toy Story is going to be produced in
96
00:05:30.965 --> 00:05:35.485
1995 and it's going to be immediately fantastic success
97
00:05:35.595 --> 00:05:40.165
with more than $360 million of revenues at the box office.
98
00:05:41.085 --> 00:05:44.725
Capitalizing on that, Pixar is going to go public.
99
00:05:45.205 --> 00:05:49.365
IPO is going to happen in November, 1995,
100
00:05:49.465 --> 00:05:51.205
and it's going to be immediately great
101
00:05:51.205 --> 00:05:53.245
success in half an hour.
102
00:05:53.745 --> 00:05:58.205
The stock price is going to move from $22 to $45
103
00:05:58.625 --> 00:06:00.405
and it's going to end at a level
104
00:06:00.505 --> 00:06:03.645
of 14 $9.50 for the period.
105
00:06:04.825 --> 00:06:08.485
At that time, the Pixar stock market value market
106
00:06:08.545 --> 00:06:10.565
capitalization is $2 billion,
107
00:06:11.305 --> 00:06:14.965
and this is slightly more than Apple for the period,
108
00:06:15.575 --> 00:06:20.485
which is the revenge for Steve Jobs later on.
109
00:06:20.485 --> 00:06:23.205
The evolution of the revenues generated by Psar
110
00:06:23.945 --> 00:06:26.125
is a consequence of success stories in the
111
00:06:26.125 --> 00:06:27.325
production of films.
112
00:06:28.425 --> 00:06:32.325
If you observe the period from 94 to 2005,
113
00:06:32.835 --> 00:06:36.365
revenue start at a very low negligible level.
114
00:06:36.745 --> 00:06:40.245
96, it's about $30 million as a consequence
115
00:06:40.245 --> 00:06:42.205
of Toy Story one.
116
00:06:42.715 --> 00:06:44.445
Then there will be a stabilization
117
00:06:45.145 --> 00:06:48.525
and really as a starting point is 99 with Bug's Life.
118
00:06:49.475 --> 00:06:54.205
Then Toy Story number two, monsters is going
119
00:06:54.205 --> 00:06:57.805
to be created and produced in 2001.
120
00:06:58.355 --> 00:07:01.325
It's going to produce all its effects in 2002,
121
00:07:02.185 --> 00:07:06.525
and then the revenues generated by Pixar are $200 million.
122
00:07:07.025 --> 00:07:10.285
In 2005, it's almost 300 million.
123
00:07:11.115 --> 00:07:13.005
What is interesting to observe is
124
00:07:13.005 --> 00:07:15.405
that their revenues are dramatically up,
125
00:07:15.945 --> 00:07:17.605
but there seems to be at the beginning
126
00:07:17.605 --> 00:07:22.525
of a plateauing in 2005 as opposed to 2004
127
00:07:23.185 --> 00:07:27.525
growth, but slowing down for the shareholders
128
00:07:27.985 --> 00:07:31.085
of Pixar, there is not much of a slowing down.
129
00:07:32.225 --> 00:07:35.965
You remember that in 2001, 2002,
130
00:07:36.255 --> 00:07:38.445
there was the explosion of the internet bubble
131
00:07:38.585 --> 00:07:41.325
and NASDAQ went down by more than 50%.
132
00:07:41.905 --> 00:07:45.165
In the meantime, because of the success of the stories
133
00:07:45.765 --> 00:07:48.645
produced by Pixar, the stock price is going
134
00:07:48.645 --> 00:07:50.445
to keep on going up,
135
00:07:51.055 --> 00:07:53.485
which is a tremendous success for the company.
136
00:07:54.825 --> 00:07:58.125
As a matter of fact, Pixar is combining growth
137
00:07:58.665 --> 00:08:02.565
and performance, which is a key for value creation,
138
00:08:02.785 --> 00:08:05.965
but there are some early longing signals.
139
00:08:07.425 --> 00:08:09.645
Of course, if you look at the money which is invested
140
00:08:09.665 --> 00:08:12.485
by the capital in its development there,
141
00:08:12.625 --> 00:08:14.165
no stop, no plateau.
142
00:08:14.755 --> 00:08:18.485
Capital expenditures represent $10 million on the average
143
00:08:18.485 --> 00:08:19.525
throughout the years
144
00:08:19.955 --> 00:08:22.805
because now the industrial manufacturing
145
00:08:22.955 --> 00:08:24.125
footprint is available.
146
00:08:24.945 --> 00:08:28.965
The amount of money invested in field production keeps on
147
00:08:29.195 --> 00:08:32.605
growing from 30 million in 2000
148
00:08:33.145 --> 00:08:35.925
to 70 million in 2005.
149
00:08:37.565 --> 00:08:40.805
I already mentioned that revenue growth was slowing down.
150
00:08:41.235 --> 00:08:44.885
What about the performance performances return on capital
151
00:08:45.245 --> 00:08:47.445
employed, which is a combination of return on sales
152
00:08:47.705 --> 00:08:50.445
and assets, productivity, assets, turnover?
153
00:08:51.845 --> 00:08:54.565
Interestingly, what is happening in the return capital,
154
00:08:54.800 --> 00:08:59.685
capital is growing, increasing Verage from 2001 to 2004,
155
00:09:00.105 --> 00:09:04.045
and then there's a little bit of getting down in 2005.
156
00:09:04.425 --> 00:09:06.765
Why? Because both commercial profitability
157
00:09:07.265 --> 00:09:11.005
and assets productivity are getting a little bit down.
158
00:09:11.865 --> 00:09:15.725
Of course, the return on capital is between 55
159
00:09:15.865 --> 00:09:19.005
and 60%, which is still quite outstanding,
160
00:09:19.545 --> 00:09:21.045
but there's a kind of the beginning
161
00:09:21.045 --> 00:09:25.205
of a plateauing in the return on capital, which is combined
162
00:09:25.205 --> 00:09:28.365
with a slowing down in the growth in the revenues.
163
00:09:30.545 --> 00:09:33.685
The good news is at a small reduction in the return capital
164
00:09:34.005 --> 00:09:36.125
employee does not show in the stock price.
165
00:09:37.195 --> 00:09:41.165
Rose went up from 2001 20%
166
00:09:41.465 --> 00:09:45.965
to 2004, 2005, 55, 60%,
167
00:09:47.225 --> 00:09:49.845
and the market to book enterprise value divided
168
00:09:49.905 --> 00:09:52.525
by capital employed, which is a market credibility.
169
00:09:52.665 --> 00:09:56.005
The relative value creation of the company is up
170
00:09:56.705 --> 00:09:59.245
in 2002, the market book is five.
171
00:09:59.985 --> 00:10:03.245
In 2004, it is about nine,
172
00:10:03.385 --> 00:10:06.125
but in 2005 it's more than 11,
173
00:10:06.905 --> 00:10:09.965
so the market is not penalizing at all.
174
00:10:10.255 --> 00:10:13.805
Pixar for the slowdown in their revenues
175
00:10:14.265 --> 00:10:18.725
and the plateauing of the return capital 2004,
176
00:10:18.725 --> 00:10:22.085
2005 is really a dec moment for Pixar.
177
00:10:22.865 --> 00:10:26.285
The company had signed an initial contract, an agreement
178
00:10:26.355 --> 00:10:29.565
with Disney for distribution in 1991.
179
00:10:30.535 --> 00:10:34.085
Later on, the initial contract had been renewed, amended,
180
00:10:34.145 --> 00:10:38.125
and so on so forth, but Steve Jobs now wants to quit Disney
181
00:10:38.465 --> 00:10:40.765
and there are strong disagreements between Steve Jobs
182
00:10:41.185 --> 00:10:43.285
and Michael Eisner, the head of Disney.
183
00:10:44.195 --> 00:10:48.005
They both have a quite relatively high ego.
184
00:10:48.675 --> 00:10:51.485
Then as a consequence, negotiations are interrupted,
185
00:10:51.785 --> 00:10:54.805
but they will start again under the leadership of Bob Iger,
186
00:10:54.805 --> 00:10:58.205
Michael Eisner successor as they are going
187
00:10:58.205 --> 00:11:00.445
to reach an agreement in January, 2006.
188
00:11:00.635 --> 00:11:04.725
This nearby PIX up for $7.4 billion.
189
00:11:05.355 --> 00:11:07.245
It's an all stock transaction,
190
00:11:07.945 --> 00:11:11.205
and at that time, Steve Jobs owns a little bit less than 50%
191
00:11:11.205 --> 00:11:15.005
of Pixar, exactly 49.65%,
192
00:11:15.625 --> 00:11:19.645
so he's going to receive Disney shares exactly 7%
193
00:11:19.645 --> 00:11:20.645
of Disney shares,
194
00:11:20.865 --> 00:11:24.485
and he's going to become the largest shareholder at Disney,
195
00:11:25.115 --> 00:11:27.605
much ahead of Michael Eisner,
196
00:11:28.105 --> 00:11:30.645
who has only 1.7%,
197
00:11:31.025 --> 00:11:35.965
and Roy Disney, Wal Disney's browser with 1% of the shares.
198
00:11:37.995 --> 00:11:40.645
It's quite interesting to spend a moment observing
199
00:11:40.905 --> 00:11:43.685
and discussing the financial metrics of the acquisition.
200
00:11:44.745 --> 00:11:48.325
You know that you can calculate multiples enterprise value
201
00:11:48.345 --> 00:11:50.605
and ebitda, enterprise value and revenues,
202
00:11:51.185 --> 00:11:54.180
but you can base this calculation on the enterprise value,
203
00:11:54.180 --> 00:11:58.045
which you observe on the average in 2005
204
00:11:58.305 --> 00:12:00.645
or the acquisition enterprise value
205
00:12:01.575 --> 00:12:03.845
based on the average 2005,
206
00:12:03.975 --> 00:12:07.805
enterprise value represents 21 years of EBITDA
207
00:12:07.805 --> 00:12:12.525
and 16 years of revenue, which is a consequence of an EBITDA
208
00:12:12.545 --> 00:12:16.965
to revenues, which is 75%, so 21 years
209
00:12:16.965 --> 00:12:18.245
of EBITDA for a company
210
00:12:18.315 --> 00:12:21.925
with an outstanding commercial performance, good prospect
211
00:12:21.945 --> 00:12:23.685
for growth is quite reasonable.
212
00:12:24.425 --> 00:12:27.125
34 years of EBITDA is
213
00:12:27.665 --> 00:12:30.325
the enterprise value based on the acquisition price
214
00:12:30.625 --> 00:12:34.845
and 26 years of revenues that starts being quite high.
215
00:12:35.745 --> 00:12:37.645
Now you remember, you can calculate the market
216
00:12:37.865 --> 00:12:40.925
to book enter price value divided by capital employed,
217
00:12:41.355 --> 00:12:43.445
putting no growth in a calculation.
218
00:12:43.465 --> 00:12:46.445
You get to a figure theoretical figure of four,
219
00:12:47.185 --> 00:12:50.765
you calculate that dividing the OSA after tax by the wac.
220
00:12:51.385 --> 00:12:54.965
Now you can confront these four times market
221
00:12:54.985 --> 00:12:58.405
to book no growth with the act hole, which is 18,
222
00:12:59.065 --> 00:13:02.085
and then you understand that there is a huge growth rate
223
00:13:02.625 --> 00:13:06.325
in the stock price in the acquisition enterprise value,
224
00:13:06.735 --> 00:13:09.245
which is no more in a p and l.
225
00:13:11.245 --> 00:13:13.495
Then you understand that the financial metrics
226
00:13:14.275 --> 00:13:18.455
of the acquisition are quite outstanding for a company
227
00:13:18.845 --> 00:13:21.975
with revenues are showing some early signs
228
00:13:21.995 --> 00:13:24.015
of potential slowdown.
229
00:13:25.525 --> 00:13:27.495
It's also quite interesting to observe
230
00:13:27.755 --> 00:13:30.055
how this name managed the integration.
231
00:13:30.875 --> 00:13:34.415
Of course, the two companies merged on a legal point of view
232
00:13:34.415 --> 00:13:36.935
and an accounting point of view on a financial point
233
00:13:36.935 --> 00:13:40.935
of view, but as far as organizations are concerned,
234
00:13:40.935 --> 00:13:42.575
they stayed away from each other.
235
00:13:43.265 --> 00:13:46.935
There were still two organizations, Pixar on the one hand,
236
00:13:47.355 --> 00:13:51.655
Disney Animation Studios on the other hand, interestingly,
237
00:13:51.845 --> 00:13:54.615
they were sharing the same chief creative
238
00:13:54.615 --> 00:13:56.135
officer, John Lasseter.
239
00:13:56.315 --> 00:13:59.775
Of course, they had the same president, Edwin Kamo
240
00:13:59.955 --> 00:14:02.175
of course, but two separate teams
241
00:14:02.835 --> 00:14:06.255
and no possibility of poaching, which means
242
00:14:06.255 --> 00:14:09.975
that if one team has a problem, they cannot take
243
00:14:10.725 --> 00:14:13.375
good animator creator and so on
244
00:14:13.375 --> 00:14:15.935
and so forth from the other organizations, they have
245
00:14:15.935 --> 00:14:18.135
to solve their problems by themselves.
246
00:14:19.105 --> 00:14:22.095
Pixar stayed in Emeril, California,
247
00:14:22.835 --> 00:14:25.175
and when a film is produced, there's a kind
248
00:14:25.175 --> 00:14:28.295
of cool branding, which is Disney, Pixar.
249
00:14:30.035 --> 00:14:32.735
As far as film production is concerned, the rest
250
00:14:32.735 --> 00:14:34.215
of the story is a dream list.
251
00:14:34.605 --> 00:14:36.615
Finding Nemo cars, right?
252
00:14:36.615 --> 00:14:40.615
Tattoo, honestly my favorite Incredibles
253
00:14:41.035 --> 00:14:43.015
inside out, et cetera.
254
00:14:43.755 --> 00:14:46.695
Of course, there was the original films plus plenty
255
00:14:46.915 --> 00:14:50.455
of swells to manage the return investment.
256
00:14:51.745 --> 00:14:54.525
As far as recognition is concerned, the company
257
00:14:55.485 --> 00:14:59.085
received plenty of awards, 23 Academy Awards
258
00:14:59.265 --> 00:15:03.125
or Scars, including 11 for the best animation film,
259
00:15:03.705 --> 00:15:07.805
10 Golden Globe Awards, 11 Grammy Awards,
260
00:15:08.585 --> 00:15:11.525
and all in all it represents about today,
261
00:15:11.635 --> 00:15:14.125
$15 billion at the box office.
262
00:15:14.865 --> 00:15:18.045
If you remember that the acquisition price was 7.4 billion.
263
00:15:18.835 --> 00:15:23.565
It's about two multiplied by the acquisition price of Pixar,
264
00:15:25.315 --> 00:15:27.935
so of course it's an outstanding story.
265
00:15:28.165 --> 00:15:29.855
It's an exceptional story,
266
00:15:30.555 --> 00:15:34.415
and it's a path which was dotted with pitfalls, noise,
267
00:15:35.415 --> 00:15:36.975
conflict, and so on and so forth.
268
00:15:38.755 --> 00:15:41.935
But now the new challenge, which is made by Pixar
269
00:15:42.155 --> 00:15:45.615
and Disney, is about a spectacular weariness.
270
00:15:46.515 --> 00:15:49.815
You can create Toy Story number 25,
271
00:15:50.675 --> 00:15:53.415
but at the end of the day it's a little bit of repetition
272
00:15:53.795 --> 00:15:56.735
and there is a threat that spectators considers
273
00:15:56.735 --> 00:15:59.575
that there is no more originality in the films.
274
00:16:00.515 --> 00:16:03.255
It does not show today in the box office
275
00:16:03.255 --> 00:16:08.015
because inside out number two, which was produced in 2024,
276
00:16:08.115 --> 00:16:12.935
so this year generated revenues of $1.7 billion,
277
00:16:13.155 --> 00:16:15.815
so it's great, but what about the future?
278
00:16:17.255 --> 00:16:19.895
Probably the company will have to balance between sequels
279
00:16:19.995 --> 00:16:24.655
for the rich and investment, but also original characters,
280
00:16:25.315 --> 00:16:28.375
and of course this is much more risky.
281
00:16:29.435 --> 00:16:31.615
Now the question is Lasseter
282
00:16:31.875 --> 00:16:35.175
and Cat Mill are no more working in the company,
283
00:16:36.195 --> 00:16:40.135
so the challenge is going to be really able to replace them.
284
00:16:40.715 --> 00:16:42.535
That's the real challenge
285
00:16:42.595 --> 00:16:45.255
for Pixar slash Disney in the future.
286
00:16:46.185 --> 00:16:47.015
Thank you very much.
Welcome to this Vidcast, which is devoted to Pixar, a company whose creativity in animation films has been a source of so many dreams for such a diverse public.
We are going to concentrate on the year 2006 when the company is acquired by Disney.
As far as shareholders are concerned, Pixar shareholders, was it the right moment for sale? Obviously, Pixar represented a disruption, a main disruption in the animation film industry.
For Steve Jobs, it was the best financial investment ever and Steve Jobs made much more money with Pixar than with Apple and for Disney it was a turnaround, the opportunity for a revival, which was absolutely crucial for the company.
Let's go back to the early years of Pixar.
At the beginning.
There is an outstanding director, George Lucas and George Lucas is going to create his own company, Lucas Film, to produce his own films.
Inside Lucas's film is going to create in 1979 the computer graphics group.
The objective is to create visual effects for films such as Star Wars.
He's going to invite pioneers to join the venture, including Dr.
Edwin Kamal, who is a genius in computer science.
He's going to receive plenty of prestigious awards such as John Neuman and the Touring Awards, and his career will end as a president of Wal Disney Animation Studios.
At a certain moment in time, there will be a certain actor showing on stage.
In May, 1985, Steve Jobs ousted from Apple.
He was more or less forced to resign after a conflict with John Sculley hired by Steve Jobs and Conflict, which is confirmed with the board of directors of Apple Co-founded by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak at that time.
Steve Jobs sells all of his 11% shares of Apple, excluding one share to be invited for the shareholders meeting, and it's not quite sure how much he got out of that, but some estimations are about $130 million.
What did he do with the money it created? Next, the next adventure, the objective is to defeat Apple to take his revenge against Apple.
The computers created and produced by Next are not going to be a massive success, but the operating system, which is based on Unix, is going to be a great success and when next later on is bought by Apple, it's going to be Mac OSX.
The second investment made by Steve Jobs is an investment in Pixar.
Steve Jobs first makes an offer, which is rejected by the management of the company.
Then the management tries to find another investor they don't find and then they go back to Steve Jobs who accepts the offer.
He's going to be paid $1 per month.
He's going to invest $5 million to buy the computer graphics groups, and he's going to inject an additional 5 million to pay for the losses and create some invested capital in the company, which is renamed Pixar Animation Studios.
What is of first interest for Steve Jobs is that Pixar is selling a Pixar, an image computer, and the objective of Steve Jobs is to fight against Apple.
Again, the revenge against Apple.
The copywriter is sold for just $135,000 at that time, to which you have to add $35 for the software, which is acquired on both from Sun Systems.
That's quite a high amount of money and it's going to be a complete commercial disaster.
They're going to sell less than 300 units.
Of course, if you compare that with Apple One, which had been sold 175 times, it looks better, but Apple two, which followed Apple one, was sold at the level of 6 million units, which is a quite different story.
In the meantime, there is a third actor who's working hard.
John Lasseter, whose creativity is outstanding, is using and capitalizing on the right software, which was developed by Pixar to produce very successful animated shortcuts who are going to receive recognition from the industry with a nomination at the Huska.
John Lasseter also has good ties with Disney, and thanks to that they are going to sign a partnership in 1991 about producing films distributed by Disney.
The rest of the stories are going to be a succession of tensions, conflicts, terrible meanings, insults, and so on and so forth, and after four and a half years of hard work and difficulties, toy Story is going to be produced in 1995 and it's going to be immediately fantastic success with more than $360 million of revenues at the box office.
Capitalizing on that, Pixar is going to go public.
IPO is going to happen in November, 1995, and it's going to be immediately great success in half an hour.
The stock price is going to move from $22 to $45 and it's going to end at a level of 14 $9.50 for the period.
At that time, the Pixar stock market value market capitalization is $2 billion, and this is slightly more than Apple for the period, which is the revenge for Steve Jobs later on.
The evolution of the revenues generated by Psar is a consequence of success stories in the production of films.
If you observe the period from 94 to 2005, revenue start at a very low negligible level.
96, it's about $30 million as a consequence of Toy Story one.
Then there will be a stabilization and really as a starting point is 99 with Bug's Life.
Then Toy Story number two, monsters is going to be created and produced in 2001.
It's going to produce all its effects in 2002, and then the revenues generated by Pixar are $200 million.
In 2005, it's almost 300 million.
What is interesting to observe is that their revenues are dramatically up, but there seems to be at the beginning of a plateauing in 2005 as opposed to 2004 growth, but slowing down for the shareholders of Pixar, there is not much of a slowing down.
You remember that in 2001, 2002, there was the explosion of the internet bubble and NASDAQ went down by more than 50%.
In the meantime, because of the success of the stories produced by Pixar, the stock price is going to keep on going up, which is a tremendous success for the company.
As a matter of fact, Pixar is combining growth and performance, which is a key for value creation, but there are some early longing signals.
Of course, if you look at the money which is invested by the capital in its development there, no stop, no plateau.
Capital expenditures represent $10 million on the average throughout the years because now the industrial manufacturing footprint is available.
The amount of money invested in field production keeps on growing from 30 million in 2000 to 70 million in 2005.
I already mentioned that revenue growth was slowing down.
What about the performance performances return on capital employed, which is a combination of return on sales and assets, productivity, assets, turnover? Interestingly, what is happening in the return capital, capital is growing, increasing Verage from 2001 to 2004, and then there's a little bit of getting down in 2005.
Why? Because both commercial profitability and assets productivity are getting a little bit down.
Of course, the return on capital is between 55 and 60%, which is still quite outstanding, but there's a kind of the beginning of a plateauing in the return on capital, which is combined with a slowing down in the growth in the revenues.
The good news is at a small reduction in the return capital employee does not show in the stock price.
Rose went up from 2001 20% to 2004, 2005, 55, 60%, and the market to book enterprise value divided by capital employed, which is a market credibility.
The relative value creation of the company is up in 2002, the market book is five.
In 2004, it is about nine, but in 2005 it's more than 11, so the market is not penalizing at all.
Pixar for the slowdown in their revenues and the plateauing of the return capital 2004, 2005 is really a dec moment for Pixar.
The company had signed an initial contract, an agreement with Disney for distribution in 1991.
Later on, the initial contract had been renewed, amended, and so on so forth, but Steve Jobs now wants to quit Disney and there are strong disagreements between Steve Jobs and Michael Eisner, the head of Disney.
They both have a quite relatively high ego.
Then as a consequence, negotiations are interrupted, but they will start again under the leadership of Bob Iger, Michael Eisner successor as they are going to reach an agreement in January, 2006.
This nearby PIX up for $7.4 billion.
It's an all stock transaction, and at that time, Steve Jobs owns a little bit less than 50% of Pixar, exactly 49.65%, so he's going to receive Disney shares exactly 7% of Disney shares, and he's going to become the largest shareholder at Disney, much ahead of Michael Eisner, who has only 1.7%, and Roy Disney, Wal Disney's browser with 1% of the shares.
It's quite interesting to spend a moment observing and discussing the financial metrics of the acquisition.
You know that you can calculate multiples enterprise value and ebitda, enterprise value and revenues, but you can base this calculation on the enterprise value, which you observe on the average in 2005 or the acquisition enterprise value based on the average 2005, enterprise value represents 21 years of EBITDA and 16 years of revenue, which is a consequence of an EBITDA to revenues, which is 75%, so 21 years of EBITDA for a company with an outstanding commercial performance, good prospect for growth is quite reasonable.
34 years of EBITDA is the enterprise value based on the acquisition price and 26 years of revenues that starts being quite high.
Now you remember, you can calculate the market to book enter price value divided by capital employed, putting no growth in a calculation.
You get to a figure theoretical figure of four, you calculate that dividing the OSA after tax by the wac.
Now you can confront these four times market to book no growth with the act hole, which is 18, and then you understand that there is a huge growth rate in the stock price in the acquisition enterprise value, which is no more in a p and l.
Then you understand that the financial metrics of the acquisition are quite outstanding for a company with revenues are showing some early signs of potential slowdown.
It's also quite interesting to observe how this name managed the integration.
Of course, the two companies merged on a legal point of view and an accounting point of view on a financial point of view, but as far as organizations are concerned, they stayed away from each other.
There were still two organizations, Pixar on the one hand, Disney Animation Studios on the other hand, interestingly, they were sharing the same chief creative officer, John Lasseter.
Of course, they had the same president, Edwin Kamo of course, but two separate teams and no possibility of poaching, which means that if one team has a problem, they cannot take good animator creator and so on and so forth from the other organizations, they have to solve their problems by themselves.
Pixar stayed in Emeril, California, and when a film is produced, there's a kind of cool branding, which is Disney, Pixar.
As far as film production is concerned, the rest of the story is a dream list.
Finding Nemo cars, right? Tattoo, honestly my favorite Incredibles inside out, et cetera.
Of course, there was the original films plus plenty of swells to manage the return investment.
As far as recognition is concerned, the company received plenty of awards, 23 Academy Awards or Scars, including 11 for the best animation film, 10 Golden Globe Awards, 11 Grammy Awards, and all in all it represents about today, $15 billion at the box office.
If you remember that the acquisition price was 7.4 billion.
It's about two multiplied by the acquisition price of Pixar, so of course it's an outstanding story.
It's an exceptional story, and it's a path which was dotted with pitfalls, noise, conflict, and so on and so forth.
But now the new challenge, which is made by Pixar and Disney, is about a spectacular weariness.
You can create Toy Story number 25, but at the end of the day it's a little bit of repetition and there is a threat that spectators considers that there is no more originality in the films.
It does not show today in the box office because inside out number two, which was produced in 2024, so this year generated revenues of $1.7 billion, so it's great, but what about the future? Probably the company will have to balance between sequels for the rich and investment, but also original characters, and of course this is much more risky.
Now the question is Lasseter and Cat Mill are no more working in the company, so the challenge is going to be really able to replace them.
That's the real challenge for Pixar slash Disney in the future.
Thank you very much.