September 2025 Vidcast // Iberdrola: Equity Issue
Iberdrola: Equity Issue
Iberdrola is the European champion of financially efficient renewable energy. But doesn’t its recent capital increase give more weight to networks and smart grids than to sustainable development?
WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.945 --> 00:00:03.855
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast, which is devoted
2
00:00:03.855 --> 00:00:05.015
to Iola.
3
00:00:05.755 --> 00:00:09.055
The company is the European leader in renewable energy
4
00:00:09.795 --> 00:00:12.575
and we are going to discuss its development project
5
00:00:13.075 --> 00:00:15.255
and the financing strategy
6
00:00:17.105 --> 00:00:18.605
in December, 2022.
7
00:00:19.205 --> 00:00:22.165
I describe the remarkable strategic shift
8
00:00:22.185 --> 00:00:24.925
of the company towards green energy
9
00:00:25.665 --> 00:00:29.325
and we observe that ESG criteria are
10
00:00:29.845 --> 00:00:33.285
absolutely not incompatible with financial performance
11
00:00:33.285 --> 00:00:34.325
and value creation.
12
00:00:35.185 --> 00:00:37.245
Now a little bit less than three years later,
13
00:00:37.435 --> 00:00:38.805
it's quite interesting
14
00:00:38.885 --> 00:00:42.765
and relevant to make an update of the financial metrics
15
00:00:42.905 --> 00:00:45.845
of the company and its strategic shift.
16
00:00:48.055 --> 00:00:50.065
It's quite interesting to observe the evolution
17
00:00:50.065 --> 00:00:51.865
of the revenues generated by the company
18
00:00:52.715 --> 00:00:55.625
first period 20 13 20 17, stability
19
00:00:55.925 --> 00:00:58.025
around 30 billion euros.
20
00:00:58.975 --> 00:01:02.465
Then increased growth in the revenues from 2017
21
00:01:02.565 --> 00:01:06.425
to 2021 from 30 billion to 40 billion.
22
00:01:07.215 --> 00:01:08.665
Then in 2022,
23
00:01:08.805 --> 00:01:11.625
an outstanding growth which is predominantly due
24
00:01:11.625 --> 00:01:14.265
to the increase in the prices of energy.
25
00:01:14.965 --> 00:01:17.025
Now as a combination of price drops
26
00:01:17.125 --> 00:01:18.265
and assets disposal,
27
00:01:18.965 --> 00:01:22.225
the revenues went down in 2324.
28
00:01:22.885 --> 00:01:26.385
Now the revenues are about 45 billion euros,
29
00:01:28.295 --> 00:01:31.565
which is remarkable throughout the period 2013 to today
30
00:01:32.145 --> 00:01:34.365
is the increase in the return on sales.
31
00:01:35.035 --> 00:01:39.005
EBIT divided by sales it was less than 10% in 2013
32
00:01:39.505 --> 00:01:43.365
and more than 20% in 2024 more than doubling
33
00:01:44.105 --> 00:01:47.685
As far as cash operating profit is concerned ebitda,
34
00:01:47.915 --> 00:01:52.405
it's up from 20% plus to a little bit less than 40%,
35
00:01:52.865 --> 00:01:55.565
so again, a dramatic increase in the
36
00:01:55.565 --> 00:01:56.725
commercial profitability.
37
00:01:59.015 --> 00:02:01.625
It's very interesting to observe that at the end of the day,
38
00:02:01.625 --> 00:02:05.625
the capital markets bought their strategic shift of ber.
39
00:02:06.645 --> 00:02:09.305
The stock price of the company from 2012
40
00:02:09.325 --> 00:02:13.265
to today went up from about four euros per share
41
00:02:13.725 --> 00:02:16.345
to about 14 euros per share.
42
00:02:17.125 --> 00:02:19.625
In the meantime, the IEX Certifi five,
43
00:02:19.645 --> 00:02:22.905
the stock market index was quite stable
44
00:02:23.135 --> 00:02:26.225
with some variability around the mean obviously.
45
00:02:26.805 --> 00:02:29.945
So IBA draw is a good case for the capital investors.
46
00:02:32.265 --> 00:02:34.875
When you look at the evolution in the recent years
47
00:02:35.335 --> 00:02:36.395
of revenues
48
00:02:36.495 --> 00:02:38.835
and cash operating profit ebitda,
49
00:02:38.905 --> 00:02:42.355
there's something which at first sight looks like a paradox.
50
00:02:42.915 --> 00:02:43.995
Revenues are down
51
00:02:44.335 --> 00:02:46.195
and EBITDA as a percentage
52
00:02:46.195 --> 00:02:49.195
to sales is up at the end of the test.
53
00:02:49.195 --> 00:02:51.235
This is explained by two facts.
54
00:02:51.535 --> 00:02:53.915
The first fact is revenues are down
55
00:02:53.915 --> 00:02:55.515
because of assets disposal
56
00:02:55.815 --> 00:02:59.115
and there's no reason why the ebit, DA as a percentage
57
00:02:59.185 --> 00:03:01.245
to revenue should be affected by that,
58
00:03:01.535 --> 00:03:04.125
especially if you sell non-profitable assets.
59
00:03:04.665 --> 00:03:07.685
But in the meantime, the sales price as far
60
00:03:07.685 --> 00:03:10.365
as energy is concerned, are dramatically down,
61
00:03:10.815 --> 00:03:13.005
which is a reason why revenues are down,
62
00:03:13.025 --> 00:03:16.845
but the supplies, the cost of supplies for hybrid draw is
63
00:03:17.485 --> 00:03:18.845
dramatically dropping.
64
00:03:19.265 --> 00:03:21.645
As a consequence, a gross margin is up.
65
00:03:21.865 --> 00:03:24.285
As a consequence, the EBIT D as a percentage
66
00:03:24.285 --> 00:03:25.485
to revenues is up.
67
00:03:27.835 --> 00:03:29.535
The company is permanently
68
00:03:29.675 --> 00:03:32.295
and massively investing in its business operations.
69
00:03:32.875 --> 00:03:36.815
The CapEx to revenue ratio lies between 12
70
00:03:37.155 --> 00:03:41.975
and 16%, 20, 24, little bit more than 68%,
71
00:03:42.675 --> 00:03:45.615
and if you calculate the investment capacity dividing
72
00:03:45.615 --> 00:03:47.495
capital expenditures by the precision
73
00:03:47.495 --> 00:03:50.535
and monetization, you get to figure which is each
74
00:03:50.535 --> 00:03:52.015
and every year more than one,
75
00:03:52.015 --> 00:03:55.575
significantly more than one about 1.5.
76
00:03:56.445 --> 00:03:58.695
This ratio is quite interesting to calculate
77
00:03:58.695 --> 00:03:59.855
because depreciation
78
00:03:59.855 --> 00:04:03.815
and ization is a consequence of past years CapEx,
79
00:04:04.395 --> 00:04:07.175
and when you take CapEx of the year divided by a kind
80
00:04:07.175 --> 00:04:09.055
of historical average of the last years,
81
00:04:09.595 --> 00:04:11.175
you observe the evolution,
82
00:04:11.235 --> 00:04:13.815
the growth in the investment of the company.
83
00:04:14.275 --> 00:04:16.495
So the company is investing more
84
00:04:16.715 --> 00:04:19.695
and more today than it was investing yesterday.
85
00:04:21.925 --> 00:04:24.345
The consequence of this investing strategy is
86
00:04:24.345 --> 00:04:26.265
that the assets turnover is low,
87
00:04:26.365 --> 00:04:28.225
the assets productivity is low.
88
00:04:28.655 --> 00:04:31.785
It's calculated dividing revenues by invested capital
89
00:04:32.245 --> 00:04:34.305
and it is 0.4.
90
00:04:34.805 --> 00:04:37.465
It does not mean that the company is poorly managed.
91
00:04:37.805 --> 00:04:40.745
It simply means that the company is operating in an industry
92
00:04:40.915 --> 00:04:42.985
which is extremely capital intensive.
93
00:04:43.735 --> 00:04:46.385
Then you remember that the return on sales eeb divided
94
00:04:46.445 --> 00:04:49.665
by revenues is about 20%, which is quite high,
95
00:04:50.205 --> 00:04:53.585
but when you multiply 20% by 0.4,
96
00:04:53.765 --> 00:04:55.825
you get a return on capital employed.
97
00:04:56.205 --> 00:05:00.065
The famous DUP point formula, which is 8%,
98
00:05:00.845 --> 00:05:03.665
the 8% is gradually increasing.
99
00:05:04.005 --> 00:05:08.665
It was only 4% in 2013, but it's not very high
100
00:05:09.125 --> 00:05:11.705
and it does not exceed the weight, leverage cost
101
00:05:11.705 --> 00:05:13.225
of capital by large.
102
00:05:13.475 --> 00:05:14.945
We'll see that in a few minutes.
103
00:05:17.285 --> 00:05:19.985
We always observe that the dynamics
104
00:05:19.985 --> 00:05:22.785
of value creation is the same as the dynamics
105
00:05:22.785 --> 00:05:25.025
of the operating profitability, the gross,
106
00:05:25.215 --> 00:05:28.825
because value comes from operating performance.
107
00:05:29.565 --> 00:05:31.425
Now, when you look at the evolution of the market
108
00:05:31.445 --> 00:05:34.305
to book enterprise value divided by a capital employee
109
00:05:35.105 --> 00:05:36.865
relative value creation and rose,
110
00:05:37.175 --> 00:05:38.945
they move in parallel directions.
111
00:05:39.525 --> 00:05:43.105
The rose is up and the market to book is up,
112
00:05:43.645 --> 00:05:47.385
but as 8% is absolutely not outstanding in terms
113
00:05:47.585 --> 00:05:48.785
of operating performance.
114
00:05:48.785 --> 00:05:51.305
Market book is relatively low.
115
00:05:51.975 --> 00:05:55.305
It's a bit more than one, which is about value creation,
116
00:05:55.685 --> 00:05:58.525
but it is a little bit less than 1.2.
117
00:05:59.105 --> 00:06:02.245
So the company is credible on a stock market,
118
00:06:02.785 --> 00:06:06.045
but the market to book is absolutely not outstanding.
119
00:06:08.115 --> 00:06:11.245
Another way to confirm the relative value creation
120
00:06:11.305 --> 00:06:13.765
and the financial performance of the company is
121
00:06:13.765 --> 00:06:15.765
to compare the evolution of the market
122
00:06:15.865 --> 00:06:20.165
to book without any growth in a free cash flow in the
123
00:06:20.165 --> 00:06:21.405
financial performance of the company
124
00:06:21.545 --> 00:06:23.205
and the act market to book.
125
00:06:23.865 --> 00:06:25.245
So theoretical market
126
00:06:25.305 --> 00:06:28.165
to book no growth is calculated dividing the R
127
00:06:28.215 --> 00:06:31.205
after tax by the weighted average cost of capital.
128
00:06:32.525 --> 00:06:36.005
Interestingly, in 2015 to 2017
129
00:06:36.705 --> 00:06:40.685
or in 20 23, 20 24, there's no gap
130
00:06:40.685 --> 00:06:42.645
between the actual market book
131
00:06:42.825 --> 00:06:46.205
and the no growth market book, which means that in the minds
132
00:06:46.205 --> 00:06:49.365
of investors there's no growth, no potential growth.
133
00:06:49.945 --> 00:06:53.085
But what happened during the period 2018
134
00:06:53.465 --> 00:06:55.805
to 2022 is quite interesting.
135
00:06:56.625 --> 00:07:00.205
The market to book no growth is up and up
136
00:07:00.345 --> 00:07:03.485
and then down, which means that the financial performance
137
00:07:03.485 --> 00:07:07.645
of the company is significantly higher as the actual market
138
00:07:07.665 --> 00:07:09.525
to book does not change very much.
139
00:07:10.105 --> 00:07:12.605
It means that the market is not quite sure
140
00:07:13.035 --> 00:07:16.165
that this increase in the performance is sustainable.
141
00:07:17.105 --> 00:07:19.565
At the end of the day, they are right
142
00:07:19.565 --> 00:07:22.325
because the market to book no growth is down
143
00:07:22.665 --> 00:07:26.005
and converges towards the actual market to book.
144
00:07:28.115 --> 00:07:29.695
But you remember, we observe
145
00:07:29.695 --> 00:07:33.375
that the return on capital employed was gradually up.
146
00:07:33.955 --> 00:07:38.695
So if return on capital employed divided by WAC is up
147
00:07:38.795 --> 00:07:41.695
and then down, it means that something happened
148
00:07:41.755 --> 00:07:44.895
to the weighted average cost of capital to the denominator.
149
00:07:45.595 --> 00:07:48.375
Now the WAC is calculated with interest rate,
150
00:07:48.565 --> 00:07:49.775
with risk premium
151
00:07:50.275 --> 00:07:52.615
and with the beta, the risk coefficient,
152
00:07:52.675 --> 00:07:54.495
the systematic risk coefficient,
153
00:07:55.085 --> 00:07:57.055
what do we observe in the long term?
154
00:07:57.715 --> 00:08:01.575
2013 to 2015, the beta is about one.
155
00:08:01.925 --> 00:08:06.055
Then it goes down to 0.5, which is a consequence of kind of
156
00:08:06.615 --> 00:08:09.095
remarkable predictability in the cash flow.
157
00:08:09.715 --> 00:08:13.175
And then if you observe what happens starting in 2022,
158
00:08:13.515 --> 00:08:17.295
the beta is up from 0.5 to 0.7
159
00:08:17.835 --> 00:08:20.695
and this is a reason why combined with the evolution
160
00:08:20.695 --> 00:08:24.815
of interest rates, the work is down and then is up.
161
00:08:27.105 --> 00:08:30.155
Then we look at the dynamics of the evolution of rose
162
00:08:30.495 --> 00:08:32.635
as opposed to work rose after tax.
163
00:08:33.255 --> 00:08:35.275
We observed that the rose, which is 6%
164
00:08:35.275 --> 00:08:37.955
after tax today, consequence of 8%
165
00:08:38.175 --> 00:08:41.315
before tax, is now exactly the same.
166
00:08:41.335 --> 00:08:42.875
By the way, the average cost of capital,
167
00:08:43.605 --> 00:08:45.635
those economic profit is kneel
168
00:08:46.135 --> 00:08:48.395
and it's kneel when it was about two,
169
00:08:48.395 --> 00:08:50.275
3% a couple of years ago.
170
00:08:51.335 --> 00:08:54.315
Why? Simply because that wack is up.
171
00:08:54.985 --> 00:08:58.605
Now the rose is down and that's very important
172
00:08:58.605 --> 00:09:01.485
because it has an impact on the financial performance
173
00:09:01.485 --> 00:09:04.845
of the company which converge towards zero, not
174
00:09:04.845 --> 00:09:07.725
because of bad operating performance, but
175
00:09:07.725 --> 00:09:10.685
because of a change in the capital markets performance
176
00:09:10.865 --> 00:09:12.045
and expectations.
177
00:09:14.735 --> 00:09:18.165
Let's conclude this first part, devoted to performance
178
00:09:18.745 --> 00:09:21.445
and evolution of relative value creation.
179
00:09:21.865 --> 00:09:23.445
The rose is up.
180
00:09:23.825 --> 00:09:27.485
The rose is not weakening even though the company is
181
00:09:27.515 --> 00:09:29.765
massively investing in its business operations,
182
00:09:30.385 --> 00:09:34.445
but the W is higher now because of interest rates and
183
00:09:34.445 --> 00:09:37.645
because of beta it was lower than higher
184
00:09:37.785 --> 00:09:40.885
and as a consequence, the financial performance
185
00:09:41.765 --> 00:09:45.965
measured instantaneously by economic profit is Neil.
186
00:09:47.845 --> 00:09:50.935
That was very much about the recent part of the company.
187
00:09:51.635 --> 00:09:53.695
Now what do we observe today?
188
00:09:54.355 --> 00:09:58.335
An acceleration of the economic and financial model.
189
00:09:58.915 --> 00:10:00.375
We some strategic shift
190
00:10:00.955 --> 00:10:02.175
and the question which is going
191
00:10:02.175 --> 00:10:05.495
to be raised from observing this evolution is
192
00:10:05.765 --> 00:10:09.775
what about preserving the values of the company in terms
193
00:10:09.795 --> 00:10:11.455
of green energy?
194
00:10:13.495 --> 00:10:17.105
What we observed about the past was definitely a strategy
195
00:10:17.585 --> 00:10:21.425
focusing on networks and renewables networks
196
00:10:21.425 --> 00:10:24.905
because there is a demand for smart grids and renewables
197
00:10:24.905 --> 00:10:27.905
because it's simply the mission statement of the company.
198
00:10:30.725 --> 00:10:33.625
It is interesting to observe over the last 10 years
199
00:10:33.645 --> 00:10:38.145
or so, the evolution of the segments, liberalized,
200
00:10:38.445 --> 00:10:41.385
energy supply, renewables, networks.
201
00:10:42.215 --> 00:10:43.225
What happens is
202
00:10:43.375 --> 00:10:47.265
what was very dominant in 2016 was liberalized energy
203
00:10:47.365 --> 00:10:50.905
supply, which was accounting for 60% of the revenues.
204
00:10:50.955 --> 00:10:55.185
Today it's down to about 45% year after year.
205
00:10:55.405 --> 00:10:57.385
The relative share of the segment is down.
206
00:10:58.295 --> 00:11:01.985
Renewable energy was absolutely marginal in 2016
207
00:11:01.985 --> 00:11:04.585
and now it's about 20% of the revenues and year
208
00:11:04.675 --> 00:11:06.545
after year it's growing.
209
00:11:07.495 --> 00:11:08.705
What about networks?
210
00:11:09.205 --> 00:11:14.185
It was about 30% in 2016 it went up and then down,
211
00:11:14.485 --> 00:11:18.025
but what we observed during the last two, three years is
212
00:11:18.025 --> 00:11:22.545
that it's definitely up there is a shift in 21, 22
213
00:11:22.855 --> 00:11:26.185
towards growth in the network business.
214
00:11:26.285 --> 00:11:27.665
In a smart grid business,
215
00:11:30.645 --> 00:11:32.745
AA has two sources of profit.
216
00:11:33.685 --> 00:11:36.505
The company is managing assets, a portfolio
217
00:11:36.525 --> 00:11:38.105
of assets projects.
218
00:11:38.575 --> 00:11:40.705
When the company is developing the project,
219
00:11:40.935 --> 00:11:42.745
it's predominantly financed by itself,
220
00:11:43.605 --> 00:11:46.145
but when the project gets to a kind of maturity,
221
00:11:46.935 --> 00:11:50.585
then the company sells some equity stakes at a profit.
222
00:11:51.595 --> 00:11:54.765
Accounting wise, this is supposed to be non-current profit,
223
00:11:54.915 --> 00:11:59.685
kind of exceptional item, but in reality it's very current
224
00:11:59.985 --> 00:12:02.445
and it's part of the business model of the company.
225
00:12:03.225 --> 00:12:05.565
The second source is about the a bit data generated
226
00:12:05.585 --> 00:12:07.125
by the operating segments.
227
00:12:07.675 --> 00:12:10.645
What we observe is lateralized segment
228
00:12:11.025 --> 00:12:12.925
is a bit volatile.
229
00:12:13.515 --> 00:12:17.485
Open market sometimes reasonably high, 2020,
230
00:12:17.915 --> 00:12:22.765
sometimes quite low, 2021, sometimes higher, 2024
231
00:12:23.145 --> 00:12:25.525
and it's 20% by far.
232
00:12:25.525 --> 00:12:27.205
It's not the highest return on sales.
233
00:12:27.265 --> 00:12:30.205
The best return on sales for the company is about renewable.
234
00:12:30.835 --> 00:12:34.125
Renewable is 40%, which is twice as much as lateralized,
235
00:12:34.745 --> 00:12:38.045
but if you observe in the past it was not 40%,
236
00:12:38.265 --> 00:12:39.965
it was 60%
237
00:12:40.625 --> 00:12:43.965
and there was a some kind of uncertainty about the evolution
238
00:12:44.025 --> 00:12:45.885
of the return on sales.
239
00:12:46.595 --> 00:12:48.405
Network is in between.
240
00:12:49.065 --> 00:12:53.725
The return on sales is a bit higher than 30%, which is not
241
00:12:53.745 --> 00:12:58.045
as high as renewables, but looks much more predictable
242
00:12:58.315 --> 00:13:02.605
because of contracts, because of a regulated environment.
243
00:13:03.145 --> 00:13:04.525
So the trend is okay
244
00:13:04.545 --> 00:13:07.765
and the stability is supposedly quarantined.
245
00:13:09.865 --> 00:13:13.845
Now, this is exactly the strategic choice which has been
246
00:13:14.245 --> 00:13:15.645
selected by the company
247
00:13:16.765 --> 00:13:21.605
networks investment from 2025 to 2028 as it is announced
248
00:13:21.625 --> 00:13:22.805
by the capital markets.
249
00:13:22.975 --> 00:13:25.525
Today is 37 billion.
250
00:13:26.515 --> 00:13:28.885
It's about predictable frameworks,
251
00:13:29.115 --> 00:13:31.085
it's about predictable cash flows.
252
00:13:31.625 --> 00:13:34.445
The investment is going to be predominantly UK
253
00:13:34.465 --> 00:13:37.605
and US for more than 70% of the 37 billion,
254
00:13:38.425 --> 00:13:41.645
and there's a kind of guaranteed weighted average nominal
255
00:13:41.665 --> 00:13:46.005
return of equity on these regulated
256
00:13:46.205 --> 00:13:47.205
networks investments.
257
00:13:47.205 --> 00:13:50.445
So basically it's about contract, it's about regulations
258
00:13:50.985 --> 00:13:55.125
and a kind of 9.5% return on equity,
259
00:13:55.175 --> 00:13:57.645
which is in the books in the contracts
260
00:13:59.685 --> 00:14:01.305
before the capital market there,
261
00:14:01.305 --> 00:14:03.345
which happened a few days ago, by the way,
262
00:14:03.765 --> 00:14:06.945
the company presented its result for the first semester
263
00:14:06.945 --> 00:14:07.945
of 2025.
264
00:14:08.725 --> 00:14:12.825
The profit is earned by 20%, which is outstanding networks.
265
00:14:13.085 --> 00:14:16.945
EBITDA is earned by 31% and networks.
266
00:14:17.005 --> 00:14:20.905
EBITDA is now more than 50% of the total ED generated
267
00:14:20.905 --> 00:14:25.225
by the company, energy production and so on and so forth.
268
00:14:25.565 --> 00:14:28.025
EBITDA minus 13%.
269
00:14:28.925 --> 00:14:31.185
Now we invest and we invest a lot.
270
00:14:31.655 --> 00:14:33.025
Investments are growing
271
00:14:33.445 --> 00:14:36.665
and growing at the rate of 14% for networks
272
00:14:37.165 --> 00:14:41.265
but not growing for renewables down by 1%.
273
00:14:41.805 --> 00:14:44.945
So the focus is definitely on networks against
274
00:14:44.945 --> 00:14:46.545
between quote renewable.
275
00:14:47.285 --> 00:14:50.785
In the meantime, the company says we are quite conservative
276
00:14:50.805 --> 00:14:52.685
in terms of financing strategy.
277
00:14:53.265 --> 00:14:54.605
The net debt is down
278
00:14:54.795 --> 00:14:57.965
because we generate operating cash flows and also
279
00:14:57.995 --> 00:15:01.365
because we generate some transaction asset rotation,
280
00:15:01.585 --> 00:15:05.005
we sell some equity stakes at a profit and against cash.
281
00:15:07.555 --> 00:15:10.375
Why invest in networks on smart grids?
282
00:15:10.375 --> 00:15:11.775
Because the demand is growing.
283
00:15:12.555 --> 00:15:15.455
If you look at the historical evolution of production
284
00:15:15.455 --> 00:15:19.095
and consumption of energy worldwide, 2015,
285
00:15:19.625 --> 00:15:22.175
about 25,000 terawatts
286
00:15:22.905 --> 00:15:25.175
today more than 30,000
287
00:15:25.755 --> 00:15:29.615
and the evolution towards 2030 is more than
288
00:15:29.715 --> 00:15:31.135
35,000.
289
00:15:31.795 --> 00:15:33.975
So there is a demand which is very much driven
290
00:15:34.155 --> 00:15:35.535
by data centers
291
00:15:36.155 --> 00:15:39.735
and data centers for artificial intelligence.
292
00:15:39.735 --> 00:15:44.495
So there is a huge impact of this industry of revolution on
293
00:15:44.495 --> 00:15:46.735
what happens in the smart grid business,
294
00:15:46.955 --> 00:15:48.255
in the energy business,
295
00:15:50.565 --> 00:15:53.665
in its financial communication, I be all assets.
296
00:15:53.885 --> 00:15:56.225
Of course there will be some storage, investment,
297
00:15:56.935 --> 00:15:58.545
battery and so on so forth.
298
00:15:58.615 --> 00:16:02.905
It's supposed to grow renewable investment plus 50%
299
00:16:03.245 --> 00:16:07.825
by 2030, but networks, investment expansion,
300
00:16:08.695 --> 00:16:13.505
replacement digitalization multiplied by two in 2030
301
00:16:14.185 --> 00:16:18.585
multiplied by three in 2035, we have to be part of the game.
302
00:16:20.865 --> 00:16:22.475
This is why communicated
303
00:16:22.535 --> 00:16:25.795
by the company when she presented the result
304
00:16:25.835 --> 00:16:28.595
of the first semester, 2025, we need funds,
305
00:16:29.175 --> 00:16:30.995
we need funding in order to be able
306
00:16:30.995 --> 00:16:34.115
to grasp this opportunity, which is unprecedented,
307
00:16:34.755 --> 00:16:38.435
networks investment outlook, we have to invest
308
00:16:39.025 --> 00:16:40.755
minimum 55 billion.
309
00:16:40.985 --> 00:16:44.235
Then later on they adjusted the figure to 58 billion
310
00:16:45.175 --> 00:16:47.035
and to find on that we need funds.
311
00:16:47.585 --> 00:16:49.115
It's going to be a great investment
312
00:16:49.115 --> 00:16:52.555
because it's about stable regulatory frameworks,
313
00:16:53.095 --> 00:16:57.435
return on equity again and again, 9.5%.
314
00:16:58.095 --> 00:16:59.555
We have to profit from that.
315
00:16:59.585 --> 00:17:01.795
It's going to be great for the earnings per share
316
00:17:01.895 --> 00:17:02.915
and so on so forth.
317
00:17:03.455 --> 00:17:07.795
But we have also to preserve our financial strengths
318
00:17:07.975 --> 00:17:10.275
and our ability to pay a dividend.
319
00:17:10.745 --> 00:17:12.035
This is why we need funds.
320
00:17:12.225 --> 00:17:15.995
This is why we are raising 5 billion from the equity market.
321
00:17:18.145 --> 00:17:21.365
The 55 billion announced when the company presented its
322
00:17:21.365 --> 00:17:24.445
result for the first semester was updated in a capital
323
00:17:24.445 --> 00:17:26.765
markets debt to 58 billion.
324
00:17:27.585 --> 00:17:29.805
We are not going to cash out 58 billion.
325
00:17:29.945 --> 00:17:31.365
We have financial partners.
326
00:17:31.365 --> 00:17:33.485
You're going to contribute up to 8 billion,
327
00:17:34.025 --> 00:17:36.485
but we have to finance 50 billion by ourselves.
328
00:17:36.985 --> 00:17:41.725
Now two thirds of these 50 billion are going to be devoted
329
00:17:41.745 --> 00:17:44.925
to networks, one third renewable energies
330
00:17:45.185 --> 00:17:46.365
and so on and so forth.
331
00:17:46.825 --> 00:17:48.605
So it's about two third for the networks
332
00:17:48.705 --> 00:17:51.445
and it's about almost two thirds for UK
333
00:17:51.865 --> 00:17:55.685
and US where the regulatory environment looks quite
334
00:17:55.685 --> 00:17:59.245
predictable and positive in terms of return and equity.
335
00:17:59.745 --> 00:18:03.885
So it's going to be about growth, actual growth of 70%.
336
00:18:04.335 --> 00:18:05.445
Again, UK
337
00:18:05.865 --> 00:18:10.835
and us, this massive investment in US
338
00:18:10.895 --> 00:18:15.875
and UK is explained by the company as a once in a century.
339
00:18:16.515 --> 00:18:20.035
Business opportunity networks, it's about growth,
340
00:18:20.525 --> 00:18:21.755
clear growth perspective,
341
00:18:22.415 --> 00:18:26.155
but growth with predictability, multiyear frameworks,
342
00:18:26.485 --> 00:18:27.675
there are contracts
343
00:18:27.695 --> 00:18:29.795
and we know how much we are going to sell
344
00:18:30.015 --> 00:18:33.315
and at which price in the medium term profitability.
345
00:18:33.645 --> 00:18:38.515
Again and again, 9.5 ROE and security
346
00:18:38.515 --> 00:18:43.075
because we are experiencing the gross in a rated
347
00:18:43.675 --> 00:18:47.195
countries, of course the company is going
348
00:18:47.195 --> 00:18:50.275
to keep on investing in renewable green energy.
349
00:18:50.785 --> 00:18:54.595
It's going to be about 21 billion out of 58,
350
00:18:55.455 --> 00:18:57.875
but then it's going to be partners contribution
351
00:18:57.895 --> 00:18:58.955
for 7 billion,
352
00:18:59.575 --> 00:19:02.315
and you remember that the total contribution from partners
353
00:19:02.335 --> 00:19:03.555
was 8 billion.
354
00:19:04.175 --> 00:19:08.075
So the partners are involved in the renewable S, not
355
00:19:08.095 --> 00:19:10.835
so much in the networks in the grids,
356
00:19:11.045 --> 00:19:12.435
which we keep for ourself.
357
00:19:13.175 --> 00:19:17.475
We are going to keep on building windmills on shore, shore
358
00:19:18.005 --> 00:19:19.275
solar storage,
359
00:19:20.185 --> 00:19:23.235
more than 90% in air rated countries,
360
00:19:23.505 --> 00:19:24.715
very predictable stuff,
361
00:19:25.335 --> 00:19:29.035
but 75 in projects already
362
00:19:29.165 --> 00:19:30.435
under construction.
363
00:19:31.135 --> 00:19:33.515
So it's not very much about new project,
364
00:19:33.985 --> 00:19:37.275
it's just about completing the existing projects
365
00:19:39.535 --> 00:19:42.395
and that's in new investment philosophy of the company.
366
00:19:42.855 --> 00:19:44.075
We want to go for growth.
367
00:19:44.615 --> 00:19:47.275
We enjoy very much predictability in the cash flows.
368
00:19:47.535 --> 00:19:48.755
We want to be profitable
369
00:19:49.015 --> 00:19:51.755
and we want to be operating in a safe environment.
370
00:19:52.415 --> 00:19:55.875
So networks is a key investment destination.
371
00:19:56.625 --> 00:19:58.515
Renewable is about completing
372
00:19:58.735 --> 00:20:02.115
and we are going to be quite selective in any case,
373
00:20:02.495 --> 00:20:05.275
we focus on a rated countries
374
00:20:05.305 --> 00:20:08.115
because the needs is investment and
375
00:20:08.115 --> 00:20:11.235
because the regulatory framework is attractive
376
00:20:11.655 --> 00:20:15.755
and predictable thanks to these conditions, we are going
377
00:20:15.755 --> 00:20:17.915
to be able to keep on growing the dividend,
378
00:20:18.375 --> 00:20:23.035
but we have to preserve our financial strengths.
379
00:20:25.435 --> 00:20:29.215
In addition to the allocation strategy information,
380
00:20:29.275 --> 00:20:31.135
the company is providing some financial
381
00:20:31.135 --> 00:20:33.135
metrics about the projects.
382
00:20:33.635 --> 00:20:35.775
As far as networks are concerned, the spread
383
00:20:35.775 --> 00:20:40.575
to work should be 200 basis points, 2% internet rate
384
00:20:40.575 --> 00:20:42.455
of return should be more than 8%.
385
00:20:43.545 --> 00:20:46.975
Renewables spread to work should be more than 2%,
386
00:20:47.265 --> 00:20:49.125
and the internal rate of return should lie
387
00:20:49.235 --> 00:20:53.525
between seven 12%, so it's WAC plus two
388
00:20:53.585 --> 00:20:55.445
or W plus more than two,
389
00:20:55.865 --> 00:20:59.365
and in the meantime, the company's endlessly repeating
390
00:20:59.635 --> 00:21:04.245
that return equity after tax is going to be 9.5%.
391
00:21:06.755 --> 00:21:08.815
As we have some financial metrics about the project,
392
00:21:08.965 --> 00:21:11.695
it's quite interesting to understand the consistency
393
00:21:11.695 --> 00:21:13.295
between internal rate of return,
394
00:21:13.635 --> 00:21:15.335
return equity, and return capital.
395
00:21:16.315 --> 00:21:18.255
The internal rate of return should exceed the work
396
00:21:18.275 --> 00:21:19.495
by at least 2%.
397
00:21:20.115 --> 00:21:23.615
The work is a weighted average cost of financial resources.
398
00:21:23.815 --> 00:21:27.815
Shareholders represent 56%, bankers, 44%.
399
00:21:28.555 --> 00:21:31.935
The shareholders expect 4% long-term government bond rate,
400
00:21:32.155 --> 00:21:34.535
but the beta times the equity market risk premium
401
00:21:34.595 --> 00:21:36.935
and the beta is now about 0.7.
402
00:21:37.555 --> 00:21:39.415
Equity market risk premium for US
403
00:21:39.415 --> 00:21:41.255
and UK investment, about 6%,
404
00:21:41.745 --> 00:21:44.255
3% is the apparent interest rate
405
00:21:44.435 --> 00:21:46.975
and 25% is the cost of taxes.
406
00:21:47.595 --> 00:21:49.895
And as interest expense tax deductible,
407
00:21:50.355 --> 00:21:52.175
we can calculate the cost of debt
408
00:21:52.315 --> 00:21:55.655
as interest rate multiplied by one minus the tax credit.
409
00:21:56.355 --> 00:21:58.735
The waac, all in all is 5.5%.
410
00:21:59.315 --> 00:22:02.175
Now, if the internal rate of return
411
00:22:02.275 --> 00:22:04.775
of all this project is 8%
412
00:22:04.775 --> 00:22:09.695
or more, then the internal rate of return exit or walk by 2%
413
00:22:09.915 --> 00:22:14.535
or more, and if the company is investing in 8%
414
00:22:14.975 --> 00:22:17.095
internal rate of return projects progressively,
415
00:22:17.115 --> 00:22:20.735
the row say should be 8% after tax.
416
00:22:21.755 --> 00:22:23.135
Now, what is the relationship
417
00:22:23.135 --> 00:22:25.215
between the return equity and rose A?
418
00:22:25.285 --> 00:22:26.535
It's named the leverage formula.
419
00:22:27.435 --> 00:22:30.655
Return equity is a function of the rose, A, the tax rate,
420
00:22:30.875 --> 00:22:32.815
the interest rate, and the financial structure
421
00:22:32.815 --> 00:22:34.975
of the company, the leverage of the gearing.
422
00:22:35.635 --> 00:22:38.455
Now, once you know the factors is the parameters,
423
00:22:38.455 --> 00:22:40.295
you can calculate the return on equity,
424
00:22:40.915 --> 00:22:43.175
but once you know the return on equity,
425
00:22:43.395 --> 00:22:44.455
you can calculate the
426
00:22:44.665 --> 00:22:48.095
after tax, which is consistent with the financial structure
427
00:22:48.315 --> 00:22:50.735
and the return on equity, and you get a Rosie
428
00:22:50.745 --> 00:22:52.815
after tax of 6.4%.
429
00:22:53.715 --> 00:22:58.215
Now it's WAC plus one, not WAC plus two.
430
00:22:58.835 --> 00:23:01.295
So there is a little bit of inconsistency
431
00:23:01.325 --> 00:23:02.975
between all these figures.
432
00:23:05.195 --> 00:23:07.695
Now, let's deep dive a little bit in the equity issue
433
00:23:07.695 --> 00:23:10.455
itself, the process is going to be accelerated,
434
00:23:10.805 --> 00:23:13.975
very accelerated by the way, book building offering.
435
00:23:14.915 --> 00:23:17.295
At the end of the process, you get the price.
436
00:23:17.675 --> 00:23:20.815
The price is going to be 15 point 15 euros,
437
00:23:21.145 --> 00:23:22.295
which shows a discount
438
00:23:22.475 --> 00:23:26.935
of 4.7% against the last stock price.
439
00:23:27.765 --> 00:23:31.255
It's accelerated, so it's reserved to qualified investors
440
00:23:31.715 --> 00:23:35.215
and the shareholders are going to abandon their preferential
441
00:23:35.815 --> 00:23:36.895
subscription, right?
442
00:23:37.475 --> 00:23:40.735
The announcement is going to be made on the 23rd of July.
443
00:23:41.435 --> 00:23:43.975
The quotation of the new share is going
444
00:23:43.975 --> 00:23:48.445
to happen on the 25th of July, so it's quite quick process.
445
00:23:50.915 --> 00:23:53.255
The capital increase, which is announced on the
446
00:23:53.255 --> 00:23:55.695
23rd of July, together with the earnings
447
00:23:55.695 --> 00:23:58.735
of the first semester is quite well received
448
00:23:58.735 --> 00:24:00.495
by the financial analyst community.
449
00:24:01.085 --> 00:24:06.055
Morningstar says, IBA, earnings guidance confirm
450
00:24:06.885 --> 00:24:09.855
5 billion Euro equity, good timing,
451
00:24:10.835 --> 00:24:12.415
but it seems that the investors
452
00:24:12.515 --> 00:24:16.135
and capital markets have a slightly more negative opinion.
453
00:24:16.875 --> 00:24:18.855
If you look at what happens as the stock price,
454
00:24:19.435 --> 00:24:23.375
the stock price went down When the announcement was made,
455
00:24:23.905 --> 00:24:27.775
there were quite a number of sale equity sales,
456
00:24:28.155 --> 00:24:30.215
and so as a consequence, stock price went down.
457
00:24:30.215 --> 00:24:34.215
Then it went up. Then I began, and then it went down,
458
00:24:34.395 --> 00:24:37.415
and today it's roughly at the same level as just
459
00:24:37.415 --> 00:24:38.855
before the announcement.
460
00:24:39.795 --> 00:24:44.175
That's okay, but in the meantime, the IEX was uh, by
461
00:24:44.875 --> 00:24:48.495
almost 10%, which means that the company still has
462
00:24:48.495 --> 00:24:51.935
to demonstrate the credibility of its new strategy
463
00:24:52.475 --> 00:24:55.775
and its ability to really make a high internal rate
464
00:24:55.775 --> 00:25:00.405
of return out of its project maybe in order
465
00:25:00.545 --> 00:25:04.605
to respond to the slightly negative consequence on the stock
466
00:25:04.605 --> 00:25:06.085
prices of this announcement.
467
00:25:06.865 --> 00:25:09.845
In the capital markets day, the company says,
468
00:25:09.985 --> 00:25:12.445
we don't need any additional capital
469
00:25:13.035 --> 00:25:16.645
with a 5 billion withdrawn, no problem, 100%.
470
00:25:16.785 --> 00:25:18.285
We are not going to visit you again.
471
00:25:18.835 --> 00:25:20.605
When we sell some equity stakes,
472
00:25:20.835 --> 00:25:24.365
when we generate cash flows, predictable, stable, et cetera,
473
00:25:24.435 --> 00:25:25.925
it's going to be enough,
474
00:25:26.425 --> 00:25:30.325
and then their plan is almost fully funded.
475
00:25:30.745 --> 00:25:32.925
So far, no liquidity risk.
476
00:25:35.385 --> 00:25:37.605
Of course, there will be some additional debt,
477
00:25:37.825 --> 00:25:40.645
but limited to 15% of the total funds,
478
00:25:41.185 --> 00:25:43.685
and when the company says This is how we are going
479
00:25:43.685 --> 00:25:45.325
to find on the 58 billion,
480
00:25:45.855 --> 00:25:47.805
there will be cashflow from operations,
481
00:25:47.805 --> 00:25:49.885
which they name funds from operations.
482
00:25:50.435 --> 00:25:52.005
Then there will be some additional debt.
483
00:25:52.465 --> 00:25:56.365
We sell equity stake, ation partnerships,
484
00:25:57.105 --> 00:25:58.765
the capital increase, which is done,
485
00:25:59.305 --> 00:26:01.765
the increase in the working capital is not going
486
00:26:01.765 --> 00:26:04.845
to consume a lot of money, which is about 4% of the funds,
487
00:26:05.785 --> 00:26:08.565
and we are going to remunerate our shareholders.
488
00:26:09.465 --> 00:26:10.685
If you look at the figures,
489
00:26:10.745 --> 00:26:13.325
it represents about 20 billion year.
490
00:26:14.545 --> 00:26:18.605
So at the end of the day, we increase that in order
491
00:26:18.785 --> 00:26:20.245
to finance the investment,
492
00:26:20.665 --> 00:26:24.925
but also in order to be able to remunerate the shareholders,
493
00:26:25.755 --> 00:26:27.765
then it's going to be funded.
494
00:26:28.305 --> 00:26:31.365
No problem in liquidity when you make this kind
495
00:26:31.365 --> 00:26:32.845
of communication is
496
00:26:32.845 --> 00:26:34.845
because you are very much aware about the evolution
497
00:26:34.845 --> 00:26:35.925
of your rating.
498
00:26:37.705 --> 00:26:40.525
Rating is very much about the financial structure
499
00:26:40.525 --> 00:26:42.245
of the company and its ability
500
00:26:42.265 --> 00:26:45.965
to repay its net financial debt with a limited number
501
00:26:45.985 --> 00:26:49.925
of years of EBIT DA, which is never leverage gearing.
502
00:26:49.925 --> 00:26:53.245
They divided by equity book value of equity.
503
00:26:53.955 --> 00:26:58.365
It's about one market value of equity is about 0.8.
504
00:26:58.875 --> 00:27:00.965
This is this financial structure, which I used
505
00:27:00.965 --> 00:27:03.885
to calculate the weighted average cost of capital, so a kind
506
00:27:03.885 --> 00:27:05.645
of balanced contribution of shareholders
507
00:27:05.745 --> 00:27:08.885
and bankers that divided by EBITDA.
508
00:27:08.985 --> 00:27:11.965
In 2022, it was about 4.5
509
00:27:12.705 --> 00:27:14.205
and then it's down and down.
510
00:27:14.395 --> 00:27:17.205
It's about 3.6, 3.7 today,
511
00:27:17.865 --> 00:27:21.765
but if we invest dramatically in the growth
512
00:27:22.505 --> 00:27:26.885
of the network segment, then debt is going to be up.
513
00:27:27.545 --> 00:27:31.645
If debt is up, there will be some financing problems maybe,
514
00:27:31.745 --> 00:27:33.285
but there will be a rating problem
515
00:27:33.825 --> 00:27:36.725
and we want to keep our rating to have access
516
00:27:36.745 --> 00:27:41.725
to the market in a very nice way, liquid and low cost.
517
00:27:44.055 --> 00:27:45.395
The financial strategy
518
00:27:45.535 --> 00:27:47.995
of the company is very well explained in the
519
00:27:47.995 --> 00:27:49.115
capital markets day.
520
00:27:49.335 --> 00:27:51.715
On top of it, it's a commitment with a rating,
521
00:27:51.715 --> 00:27:56.515
which is triple B plus, so it's not in the A zone,
522
00:27:57.055 --> 00:27:59.155
but it is extremely safe.
523
00:27:59.375 --> 00:28:01.515
Triple B plus for S and p
524
00:28:01.815 --> 00:28:04.995
and Fitch BAA one for Moody's.
525
00:28:05.735 --> 00:28:08.915
Now it's based on growing funds from operations,
526
00:28:09.415 --> 00:28:13.435
new investment stabilized, predictable asset
527
00:28:13.935 --> 00:28:15.075
and partnership plans.
528
00:28:15.335 --> 00:28:16.755
We sell some equity stakes,
529
00:28:16.755 --> 00:28:18.995
which is very much about the current activity
530
00:28:18.995 --> 00:28:21.555
of the company, and then we have liquidity.
531
00:28:21.575 --> 00:28:23.195
We have access to the debt market
532
00:28:23.585 --> 00:28:25.395
because we are a safe investment
533
00:28:26.095 --> 00:28:29.115
and we are extremely conservative in terms
534
00:28:29.135 --> 00:28:30.635
of financial strategy.
535
00:28:31.255 --> 00:28:34.875
Now we have access to a diversified portfolio
536
00:28:35.095 --> 00:28:36.915
of financing resources.
537
00:28:39.235 --> 00:28:41.315
Historically, IBA has initiated
538
00:28:41.415 --> 00:28:45.715
and completed a remarkable strategic transformation towards
539
00:28:45.805 --> 00:28:48.195
green energy, renewable energy,
540
00:28:48.935 --> 00:28:50.795
and the company has nicely demonstrated
541
00:28:50.795 --> 00:28:53.635
that ESG is absolutely compatible
542
00:28:53.865 --> 00:28:55.515
with financial performance.
543
00:28:56.615 --> 00:29:00.995
Of course, today, the company keeps on communicating on ESG,
544
00:29:01.565 --> 00:29:03.475
increasing social dividends.
545
00:29:04.315 --> 00:29:07.235
E, we are going to be carbon neutral by 2030
546
00:29:07.655 --> 00:29:09.195
as we pay our taxes.
547
00:29:09.735 --> 00:29:14.435
We invest in innovation, we create jobs at OLA
548
00:29:14.495 --> 00:29:15.835
and at our suppliers.
549
00:29:16.575 --> 00:29:18.755
Gee, we have the best practices in terms
550
00:29:18.755 --> 00:29:22.635
of corporate governance, so these criteria are still there,
551
00:29:23.175 --> 00:29:26.435
but you understand that the focus is a little bit more on
552
00:29:27.155 --> 00:29:28.435
demonstrating to the investors
553
00:29:28.435 --> 00:29:31.195
that we are grasping an opportunity,
554
00:29:31.195 --> 00:29:32.915
which is about networks.
555
00:29:35.235 --> 00:29:38.605
Financial value is created by profitable growth.
556
00:29:39.385 --> 00:29:43.285
The company is showing an outstanding investment case which
557
00:29:43.365 --> 00:29:48.125
combines growth, security, predictability, profitability.
558
00:29:48.955 --> 00:29:51.965
Even though there are a few questions about the calculations
559
00:29:51.965 --> 00:29:55.925
and the metrics, of course the company is still ESG,
560
00:29:56.025 --> 00:29:57.805
but if you look at the evolution
561
00:29:57.805 --> 00:30:02.005
of the investment in renewables, it's just completing
562
00:30:02.005 --> 00:30:03.125
what we have started.
563
00:30:03.865 --> 00:30:06.165
It may be a little bit less the future
564
00:30:06.265 --> 00:30:08.085
of the company, unfortunately.
565
00:30:08.855 --> 00:30:09.645
Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to this Vidcast, which is devoted to Iola.
The company is the European leader in renewable energy and we are going to discuss its development project and the financing strategy in December, 2022.
I describe the remarkable strategic shift of the company towards green energy and we observe that ESG criteria are absolutely not incompatible with financial performance and value creation.
Now a little bit less than three years later, it's quite interesting and relevant to make an update of the financial metrics of the company and its strategic shift.
It's quite interesting to observe the evolution of the revenues generated by the company first period 20 13 20 17, stability around 30 billion euros.
Then increased growth in the revenues from 2017 to 2021 from 30 billion to 40 billion.
Then in 2022, an outstanding growth which is predominantly due to the increase in the prices of energy.
Now as a combination of price drops and assets disposal, the revenues went down in 2324.
Now the revenues are about 45 billion euros, which is remarkable throughout the period 2013 to today is the increase in the return on sales.
EBIT divided by sales it was less than 10% in 2013 and more than 20% in 2024 more than doubling As far as cash operating profit is concerned ebitda, it's up from 20% plus to a little bit less than 40%, so again, a dramatic increase in the commercial profitability.
It's very interesting to observe that at the end of the day, the capital markets bought their strategic shift of ber.
The stock price of the company from 2012 to today went up from about four euros per share to about 14 euros per share.
In the meantime, the IEX Certifi five, the stock market index was quite stable with some variability around the mean obviously.
So IBA draw is a good case for the capital investors.
When you look at the evolution in the recent years of revenues and cash operating profit ebitda, there's something which at first sight looks like a paradox.
Revenues are down and EBITDA as a percentage to sales is up at the end of the test.
This is explained by two facts.
The first fact is revenues are down because of assets disposal and there's no reason why the ebit, DA as a percentage to revenue should be affected by that, especially if you sell non-profitable assets.
But in the meantime, the sales price as far as energy is concerned, are dramatically down, which is a reason why revenues are down, but the supplies, the cost of supplies for hybrid draw is dramatically dropping.
As a consequence, a gross margin is up.
As a consequence, the EBIT D as a percentage to revenues is up.
The company is permanently and massively investing in its business operations.
The CapEx to revenue ratio lies between 12 and 16%, 20, 24, little bit more than 68%, and if you calculate the investment capacity dividing capital expenditures by the precision and monetization, you get to figure which is each and every year more than one, significantly more than one about 1.5.
This ratio is quite interesting to calculate because depreciation and ization is a consequence of past years CapEx, and when you take CapEx of the year divided by a kind of historical average of the last years, you observe the evolution, the growth in the investment of the company.
So the company is investing more and more today than it was investing yesterday.
The consequence of this investing strategy is that the assets turnover is low, the assets productivity is low.
It's calculated dividing revenues by invested capital and it is 0.4.
It does not mean that the company is poorly managed.
It simply means that the company is operating in an industry which is extremely capital intensive.
Then you remember that the return on sales eeb divided by revenues is about 20%, which is quite high, but when you multiply 20% by 0.4, you get a return on capital employed.
The famous DUP point formula, which is 8%, the 8% is gradually increasing.
It was only 4% in 2013, but it's not very high and it does not exceed the weight, leverage cost of capital by large.
We'll see that in a few minutes.
We always observe that the dynamics of value creation is the same as the dynamics of the operating profitability, the gross, because value comes from operating performance.
Now, when you look at the evolution of the market to book enterprise value divided by a capital employee relative value creation and rose, they move in parallel directions.
The rose is up and the market to book is up, but as 8% is absolutely not outstanding in terms of operating performance.
Market book is relatively low.
It's a bit more than one, which is about value creation, but it is a little bit less than 1.2.
So the company is credible on a stock market, but the market to book is absolutely not outstanding.
Another way to confirm the relative value creation and the financial performance of the company is to compare the evolution of the market to book without any growth in a free cash flow in the financial performance of the company and the act market to book.
So theoretical market to book no growth is calculated dividing the R after tax by the weighted average cost of capital.
Interestingly, in 2015 to 2017 or in 20 23, 20 24, there's no gap between the actual market book and the no growth market book, which means that in the minds of investors there's no growth, no potential growth.
But what happened during the period 2018 to 2022 is quite interesting.
The market to book no growth is up and up and then down, which means that the financial performance of the company is significantly higher as the actual market to book does not change very much.
It means that the market is not quite sure that this increase in the performance is sustainable.
At the end of the day, they are right because the market to book no growth is down and converges towards the actual market to book.
But you remember, we observe that the return on capital employed was gradually up.
So if return on capital employed divided by WAC is up and then down, it means that something happened to the weighted average cost of capital to the denominator.
Now the WAC is calculated with interest rate, with risk premium and with the beta, the risk coefficient, the systematic risk coefficient, what do we observe in the long term? 2013 to 2015, the beta is about one.
Then it goes down to 0.5, which is a consequence of kind of remarkable predictability in the cash flow.
And then if you observe what happens starting in 2022, the beta is up from 0.5 to 0.7 and this is a reason why combined with the evolution of interest rates, the work is down and then is up.
Then we look at the dynamics of the evolution of rose as opposed to work rose after tax.
We observed that the rose, which is 6% after tax today, consequence of 8% before tax, is now exactly the same.
By the way, the average cost of capital, those economic profit is kneel and it's kneel when it was about two, 3% a couple of years ago.
Why? Simply because that wack is up.
Now the rose is down and that's very important because it has an impact on the financial performance of the company which converge towards zero, not because of bad operating performance, but because of a change in the capital markets performance and expectations.
Let's conclude this first part, devoted to performance and evolution of relative value creation.
The rose is up.
The rose is not weakening even though the company is massively investing in its business operations, but the W is higher now because of interest rates and because of beta it was lower than higher and as a consequence, the financial performance measured instantaneously by economic profit is Neil.
That was very much about the recent part of the company.
Now what do we observe today? An acceleration of the economic and financial model.
We some strategic shift and the question which is going to be raised from observing this evolution is what about preserving the values of the company in terms of green energy? What we observed about the past was definitely a strategy focusing on networks and renewables networks because there is a demand for smart grids and renewables because it's simply the mission statement of the company.
It is interesting to observe over the last 10 years or so, the evolution of the segments, liberalized, energy supply, renewables, networks.
What happens is what was very dominant in 2016 was liberalized energy supply, which was accounting for 60% of the revenues.
Today it's down to about 45% year after year.
The relative share of the segment is down.
Renewable energy was absolutely marginal in 2016 and now it's about 20% of the revenues and year after year it's growing.
What about networks? It was about 30% in 2016 it went up and then down, but what we observed during the last two, three years is that it's definitely up there is a shift in 21, 22 towards growth in the network business.
In a smart grid business, AA has two sources of profit.
The company is managing assets, a portfolio of assets projects.
When the company is developing the project, it's predominantly financed by itself, but when the project gets to a kind of maturity, then the company sells some equity stakes at a profit.
Accounting wise, this is supposed to be non-current profit, kind of exceptional item, but in reality it's very current and it's part of the business model of the company.
The second source is about the a bit data generated by the operating segments.
What we observe is lateralized segment is a bit volatile.
Open market sometimes reasonably high, 2020, sometimes quite low, 2021, sometimes higher, 2024 and it's 20% by far.
It's not the highest return on sales.
The best return on sales for the company is about renewable.
Renewable is 40%, which is twice as much as lateralized, but if you observe in the past it was not 40%, it was 60% and there was a some kind of uncertainty about the evolution of the return on sales.
Network is in between.
The return on sales is a bit higher than 30%, which is not as high as renewables, but looks much more predictable because of contracts, because of a regulated environment.
So the trend is okay and the stability is supposedly quarantined.
Now, this is exactly the strategic choice which has been selected by the company networks investment from 2025 to 2028 as it is announced by the capital markets.
Today is 37 billion.
It's about predictable frameworks, it's about predictable cash flows.
The investment is going to be predominantly UK and US for more than 70% of the 37 billion, and there's a kind of guaranteed weighted average nominal return of equity on these regulated networks investments.
So basically it's about contract, it's about regulations and a kind of 9.5% return on equity, which is in the books in the contracts before the capital market there, which happened a few days ago, by the way, the company presented its result for the first semester of 2025.
The profit is earned by 20%, which is outstanding networks.
EBITDA is earned by 31% and networks.
EBITDA is now more than 50% of the total ED generated by the company, energy production and so on and so forth.
EBITDA minus 13%.
Now we invest and we invest a lot.
Investments are growing and growing at the rate of 14% for networks but not growing for renewables down by 1%.
So the focus is definitely on networks against between quote renewable.
In the meantime, the company says we are quite conservative in terms of financing strategy.
The net debt is down because we generate operating cash flows and also because we generate some transaction asset rotation, we sell some equity stakes at a profit and against cash.
Why invest in networks on smart grids? Because the demand is growing.
If you look at the historical evolution of production and consumption of energy worldwide, 2015, about 25,000 terawatts today more than 30,000 and the evolution towards 2030 is more than 35,000.
So there is a demand which is very much driven by data centers and data centers for artificial intelligence.
So there is a huge impact of this industry of revolution on what happens in the smart grid business, in the energy business, in its financial communication, I be all assets.
Of course there will be some storage, investment, battery and so on so forth.
It's supposed to grow renewable investment plus 50% by 2030, but networks, investment expansion, replacement digitalization multiplied by two in 2030 multiplied by three in 2035, we have to be part of the game.
This is why communicated by the company when she presented the result of the first semester, 2025, we need funds, we need funding in order to be able to grasp this opportunity, which is unprecedented, networks investment outlook, we have to invest minimum 55 billion.
Then later on they adjusted the figure to 58 billion and to find on that we need funds.
It's going to be a great investment because it's about stable regulatory frameworks, return on equity again and again, 9.5%.
We have to profit from that.
It's going to be great for the earnings per share and so on so forth.
But we have also to preserve our financial strengths and our ability to pay a dividend.
This is why we need funds.
This is why we are raising 5 billion from the equity market.
The 55 billion announced when the company presented its result for the first semester was updated in a capital markets debt to 58 billion.
We are not going to cash out 58 billion.
We have financial partners.
You're going to contribute up to 8 billion, but we have to finance 50 billion by ourselves.
Now two thirds of these 50 billion are going to be devoted to networks, one third renewable energies and so on and so forth.
So it's about two third for the networks and it's about almost two thirds for UK and US where the regulatory environment looks quite predictable and positive in terms of return and equity.
So it's going to be about growth, actual growth of 70%.
Again, UK and us, this massive investment in US and UK is explained by the company as a once in a century.
Business opportunity networks, it's about growth, clear growth perspective, but growth with predictability, multiyear frameworks, there are contracts and we know how much we are going to sell and at which price in the medium term profitability.
Again and again, 9.5 ROE and security because we are experiencing the gross in a rated countries, of course the company is going to keep on investing in renewable green energy.
It's going to be about 21 billion out of 58, but then it's going to be partners contribution for 7 billion, and you remember that the total contribution from partners was 8 billion.
So the partners are involved in the renewable S, not so much in the networks in the grids, which we keep for ourself.
We are going to keep on building windmills on shore, shore solar storage, more than 90% in air rated countries, very predictable stuff, but 75 in projects already under construction.
So it's not very much about new project, it's just about completing the existing projects and that's in new investment philosophy of the company.
We want to go for growth.
We enjoy very much predictability in the cash flows.
We want to be profitable and we want to be operating in a safe environment.
So networks is a key investment destination.
Renewable is about completing and we are going to be quite selective in any case, we focus on a rated countries because the needs is investment and because the regulatory framework is attractive and predictable thanks to these conditions, we are going to be able to keep on growing the dividend, but we have to preserve our financial strengths.
In addition to the allocation strategy information, the company is providing some financial metrics about the projects.
As far as networks are concerned, the spread to work should be 200 basis points, 2% internet rate of return should be more than 8%.
Renewables spread to work should be more than 2%, and the internal rate of return should lie between seven 12%, so it's WAC plus two or W plus more than two, and in the meantime, the company's endlessly repeating that return equity after tax is going to be 9.5%.
As we have some financial metrics about the project, it's quite interesting to understand the consistency between internal rate of return, return equity, and return capital.
The internal rate of return should exceed the work by at least 2%.
The work is a weighted average cost of financial resources.
Shareholders represent 56%, bankers, 44%.
The shareholders expect 4% long-term government bond rate, but the beta times the equity market risk premium and the beta is now about 0.7.
Equity market risk premium for US and UK investment, about 6%, 3% is the apparent interest rate and 25% is the cost of taxes.
And as interest expense tax deductible, we can calculate the cost of debt as interest rate multiplied by one minus the tax credit.
The waac, all in all is 5.5%.
Now, if the internal rate of return of all this project is 8% or more, then the internal rate of return exit or walk by 2% or more, and if the company is investing in 8% internal rate of return projects progressively, the row say should be 8% after tax.
Now, what is the relationship between the return equity and rose A? It's named the leverage formula.
Return equity is a function of the rose, A, the tax rate, the interest rate, and the financial structure of the company, the leverage of the gearing.
Now, once you know the factors is the parameters, you can calculate the return on equity, but once you know the return on equity, you can calculate the after tax, which is consistent with the financial structure and the return on equity, and you get a Rosie after tax of 6.4%.
Now it's WAC plus one, not WAC plus two.
So there is a little bit of inconsistency between all these figures.
Now, let's deep dive a little bit in the equity issue itself, the process is going to be accelerated, very accelerated by the way, book building offering.
At the end of the process, you get the price.
The price is going to be 15 point 15 euros, which shows a discount of 4.7% against the last stock price.
It's accelerated, so it's reserved to qualified investors and the shareholders are going to abandon their preferential subscription, right? The announcement is going to be made on the 23rd of July.
The quotation of the new share is going to happen on the 25th of July, so it's quite quick process.
The capital increase, which is announced on the 23rd of July, together with the earnings of the first semester is quite well received by the financial analyst community.
Morningstar says, IBA, earnings guidance confirm 5 billion Euro equity, good timing, but it seems that the investors and capital markets have a slightly more negative opinion.
If you look at what happens as the stock price, the stock price went down When the announcement was made, there were quite a number of sale equity sales, and so as a consequence, stock price went down.
Then it went up.
Then I began, and then it went down, and today it's roughly at the same level as just before the announcement.
That's okay, but in the meantime, the IEX was uh, by almost 10%, which means that the company still has to demonstrate the credibility of its new strategy and its ability to really make a high internal rate of return out of its project maybe in order to respond to the slightly negative consequence on the stock prices of this announcement.
In the capital markets day, the company says, we don't need any additional capital with a 5 billion withdrawn, no problem, 100%.
We are not going to visit you again.
When we sell some equity stakes, when we generate cash flows, predictable, stable, et cetera, it's going to be enough, and then their plan is almost fully funded.
So far, no liquidity risk.
Of course, there will be some additional debt, but limited to 15% of the total funds, and when the company says This is how we are going to find on the 58 billion, there will be cashflow from operations, which they name funds from operations.
Then there will be some additional debt.
We sell equity stake, ation partnerships, the capital increase, which is done, the increase in the working capital is not going to consume a lot of money, which is about 4% of the funds, and we are going to remunerate our shareholders.
If you look at the figures, it represents about 20 billion year.
So at the end of the day, we increase that in order to finance the investment, but also in order to be able to remunerate the shareholders, then it's going to be funded.
No problem in liquidity when you make this kind of communication is because you are very much aware about the evolution of your rating.
Rating is very much about the financial structure of the company and its ability to repay its net financial debt with a limited number of years of EBIT DA, which is never leverage gearing.
They divided by equity book value of equity.
It's about one market value of equity is about 0.8.
This is this financial structure, which I used to calculate the weighted average cost of capital, so a kind of balanced contribution of shareholders and bankers that divided by EBITDA.
In 2022, it was about 4.5 and then it's down and down.
It's about 3.6, 3.7 today, but if we invest dramatically in the growth of the network segment, then debt is going to be up.
If debt is up, there will be some financing problems maybe, but there will be a rating problem and we want to keep our rating to have access to the market in a very nice way, liquid and low cost.
The financial strategy of the company is very well explained in the capital markets day.
On top of it, it's a commitment with a rating, which is triple B plus, so it's not in the A zone, but it is extremely safe.
Triple B plus for S and p and Fitch BAA one for Moody's.
Now it's based on growing funds from operations, new investment stabilized, predictable asset and partnership plans.
We sell some equity stakes, which is very much about the current activity of the company, and then we have liquidity.
We have access to the debt market because we are a safe investment and we are extremely conservative in terms of financial strategy.
Now we have access to a diversified portfolio of financing resources.
Historically, IBA has initiated and completed a remarkable strategic transformation towards green energy, renewable energy, and the company has nicely demonstrated that ESG is absolutely compatible with financial performance.
Of course, today, the company keeps on communicating on ESG, increasing social dividends.
E, we are going to be carbon neutral by 2030 as we pay our taxes.
We invest in innovation, we create jobs at OLA and at our suppliers.
Gee, we have the best practices in terms of corporate governance, so these criteria are still there, but you understand that the focus is a little bit more on demonstrating to the investors that we are grasping an opportunity, which is about networks.
Financial value is created by profitable growth.
The company is showing an outstanding investment case which combines growth, security, predictability, profitability.
Even though there are a few questions about the calculations and the metrics, of course the company is still ESG, but if you look at the evolution of the investment in renewables, it's just completing what we have started.
It may be a little bit less the future of the company, unfortunately.
Thank you very much.