Educational film 2, February 2023 // Rio Tinto: Market value, current practices and ESG
Film 2: Consequences
More and more, managers and directors are concerned about the environmental and social practices that underlie them. It is increasingly clear that governance and financial and stock market performance depend on it.
The mining sector is particularly vulnerable to the impact of poor practices within the sector.
In a desire to include ESG management in our training and content, we wanted to draw an exhaustive portrait of the Anglo-Australian giant Rio Tinto in this area.
The subject and the contradictions discovered being so vast, we thought it would be a good idea to make two films to cover all the issues.
The second notes the major problems facing the mining industry. It also demonstrates that there are solutions that can be applied to the increasingly essential ESG principles.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:07.500 --> 00:00:10.300
Hello and welcome to the second film which is devoted to
2
00:00:10.300 --> 00:00:13.800
Rio Tinto and the relationship between market
3
00:00:13.800 --> 00:00:17.000
value and ESG environment
4
00:00:16.900 --> 00:00:18.600
society and governance.
5
00:00:19.600 --> 00:00:22.500
You remember that Rio Tito is operating in a mining
6
00:00:22.500 --> 00:00:25.700
industry. It's an Anglo Australian company and
7
00:00:25.700 --> 00:00:28.200
what we observed during the first film is that the
8
00:00:28.200 --> 00:00:31.200
capital is performance was justifying a market
9
00:00:31.200 --> 00:00:34.500
to book Enterprise Value divided by
10
00:00:34.500 --> 00:00:37.900
Capital employed of four times. The
11
00:00:37.900 --> 00:00:40.300
cabinet should be worth four times the
12
00:00:40.300 --> 00:00:43.800
amount of money which is invested in the business operations. And
13
00:00:43.800 --> 00:00:46.400
what did we observe the market value
14
00:00:46.400 --> 00:00:49.800
was only representing twice the capital
15
00:00:49.800 --> 00:00:52.300
employed. That's obviously the
16
00:00:52.300 --> 00:00:55.800
consequence of the major credibility gap, which
17
00:00:55.800 --> 00:00:58.600
we try to explain now can the
18
00:00:58.600 --> 00:01:02.000
particular specific ESG profile of
19
00:01:01.700 --> 00:01:04.300
radio Tinto or the
20
00:01:04.300 --> 00:01:07.800
mining industry at large be regarded as
21
00:01:07.800 --> 00:01:10.500
an explanatory factor for this huge
22
00:01:10.500 --> 00:01:13.900
difference between expected value and
23
00:01:13.900 --> 00:01:15.000
actual value.
24
00:01:16.200 --> 00:01:20.100
That's not a small issue. The answer is really a
25
00:01:19.100 --> 00:01:22.800
financial issue because the company's worth
26
00:01:22.800 --> 00:01:25.200
twice should be worth four times the difference between
27
00:01:25.200 --> 00:01:28.700
four and two is two and then the difference represents
28
00:01:28.700 --> 00:01:33.500
twice a capital employed, which is only 110
29
00:01:31.500 --> 00:01:34.400
billion dollars. So
30
00:01:34.400 --> 00:01:37.500
it's absolutely not negligible. We need to Deep dive
31
00:01:37.500 --> 00:01:38.600
into this Gap.
32
00:01:39.600 --> 00:01:43.000
Very interestingly. When did we start observing
33
00:01:42.100 --> 00:01:45.900
the Gap 2017 you remember
34
00:01:45.900 --> 00:01:48.600
that in all my films? I always make the
35
00:01:48.600 --> 00:01:51.700
correlation for industrial firms between the return capital
36
00:01:51.700 --> 00:01:54.200
and the market to book the market to book
37
00:01:54.200 --> 00:01:57.400
measures a relative value creation and in
38
00:01:57.400 --> 00:02:00.500
return Capital the economic performance of the company what
39
00:02:00.500 --> 00:02:03.300
we observe throughout the years of the company is a perfect
40
00:02:03.300 --> 00:02:06.500
consistency between the return capital in the market the
41
00:02:06.500 --> 00:02:09.900
book up to 20 16 2017. There's
42
00:02:09.900 --> 00:02:12.600
a little bit of Gap and the Gap is widening.
43
00:02:13.600 --> 00:02:17.500
But the return capital is very interesting Indie
44
00:02:16.500 --> 00:02:19.600
gear. It's not the performance the
45
00:02:19.600 --> 00:02:22.000
financial performance of a company consists in
46
00:02:22.400 --> 00:02:25.200
confronting the return capital of the tax and the way
47
00:02:25.200 --> 00:02:29.000
that average cost of capital and there's a very interesting Financial
48
00:02:28.600 --> 00:02:32.200
indicator which consists in confronting these
49
00:02:31.200 --> 00:02:34.500
two calculating the return Capital after tax
50
00:02:34.500 --> 00:02:37.400
divided by the work to measure
51
00:02:37.400 --> 00:02:40.900
something which might be the theoretical Market to
52
00:02:40.900 --> 00:02:43.200
book assuming there's no growth in the free cash
53
00:02:43.200 --> 00:02:43.300
flow.
54
00:02:43.800 --> 00:02:46.500
Then if you look at the financial performance, this
55
00:02:46.500 --> 00:02:49.300
is what your Market to book should be. And then we confront
56
00:02:49.300 --> 00:02:52.000
that with what the market to book actually is.
57
00:02:52.700 --> 00:02:56.500
We have exactly the same conclusion perfect consistency
58
00:02:55.500 --> 00:02:58.800
up to 2016 a gap
59
00:02:58.800 --> 00:03:01.500
starting in 2017. And the Gap
60
00:03:01.500 --> 00:03:04.800
is widening from 2017 on of
61
00:03:04.800 --> 00:03:08.700
course. We can't find an explanation for 2021 at
62
00:03:08.700 --> 00:03:11.700
that time exceptional row materials prices.
63
00:03:12.500 --> 00:03:15.300
So you could argue that investors considers that it's
64
00:03:15.300 --> 00:03:16.700
exceptional not sustainable.
65
00:03:17.500 --> 00:03:22.500
It declines 2021. It does not explain 2018-2019 and
66
00:03:22.500 --> 00:03:23.200
2020.
67
00:03:24.200 --> 00:03:27.300
Now we have to look at the ESG track record of
68
00:03:27.300 --> 00:03:30.200
Rio Tinto e and s first and then a little
69
00:03:30.200 --> 00:03:33.700
bit later G. What about environment you remember
70
00:03:33.700 --> 00:03:36.600
the first thing I was mentioning it difficult start
71
00:03:36.600 --> 00:03:40.100
in Spain with toxic smokes at that
72
00:03:39.100 --> 00:03:41.200
time the company communicated.
73
00:03:42.100 --> 00:03:45.700
This is the inevitable consequences of technical progress.
74
00:03:45.700 --> 00:03:47.900
Are you against progress? No?
75
00:03:48.500 --> 00:03:52.300
As well probably a confusion between tactical progress
76
00:03:51.300 --> 00:03:54.300
and societal progress, but that
77
00:03:54.300 --> 00:03:58.000
has a story later on even mouth in
78
00:03:57.200 --> 00:04:01.000
the six days much Beyond acceptable
79
00:04:00.400 --> 00:04:03.800
lead content. It's about pollution. It's
80
00:04:03.800 --> 00:04:06.700
about health. It's about safety the very
81
00:04:06.700 --> 00:04:09.500
well known Kruger National Park in South Africa. There's
82
00:04:09.500 --> 00:04:12.100
close to the park. There is a corporate mine which
83
00:04:12.100 --> 00:04:16.400
is named parabaro, which is very likely producing
84
00:04:15.400 --> 00:04:18.800
some contamination of Flora and
85
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:21.800
Fauna. Let's move on with the list acquisition in
86
00:04:21.800 --> 00:04:24.800
1989 of Kenneth copper
87
00:04:24.800 --> 00:04:27.500
copper mining huge difficulties with
88
00:04:27.500 --> 00:04:31.100
a flammable mining site in Wisconsin, Utah and
89
00:04:30.100 --> 00:04:34.500
a grand water contamination huge
90
00:04:33.500 --> 00:04:36.900
right on biodiversity in
91
00:04:36.900 --> 00:04:39.200
Madagascar, etc. Etc. Etc.
92
00:04:39.200 --> 00:04:42.100
The list is very long. That's for eel. Let's move
93
00:04:42.100 --> 00:04:43.100
to a society.
94
00:04:44.800 --> 00:04:47.600
Permanent constant violations of labor laws
95
00:04:47.600 --> 00:04:50.500
in 2022. The capital is suing a
96
00:04:50.500 --> 00:04:54.000
report which confesses gender
97
00:04:53.200 --> 00:04:57.000
and racial discrimination and harassment
98
00:04:56.300 --> 00:05:00.200
they are very violent labor
99
00:04:59.200 --> 00:05:02.300
disputes. And sometimes the capital is
100
00:05:02.300 --> 00:05:06.000
accused of corporating was governance which are less and
101
00:05:05.200 --> 00:05:08.500
acceptable in terms of Human Rights and so
102
00:05:08.500 --> 00:05:11.600
on so forth last but not least the capital
103
00:05:11.600 --> 00:05:14.200
is showing little respect for local communities.
104
00:05:15.100 --> 00:05:18.200
A very good and recent example is back in
105
00:05:18.200 --> 00:05:22.000
2020. We are in Western Australia the
106
00:05:21.600 --> 00:05:24.600
Duke and Gorge. It's an Aboriginal
107
00:05:24.600 --> 00:05:27.000
site which demonstrate the presence of
108
00:05:27.400 --> 00:05:30.800
human beings the last 46,000 years
109
00:05:30.800 --> 00:05:33.300
and it's a sacred site for the local community.
110
00:05:34.300 --> 00:05:37.800
But the CEO says you know what underneath
111
00:05:37.800 --> 00:05:40.700
we have 100 answer 35
112
00:05:40.700 --> 00:05:44.400
million dollars worth of iron ore for
113
00:05:43.400 --> 00:05:46.900
a few Stone. We are not going to sacrify that
114
00:05:46.900 --> 00:05:49.400
because the one Harrison 35 million dollars
115
00:05:49.400 --> 00:05:52.600
are going to create 70% of it down
116
00:05:52.600 --> 00:05:55.400
and they'd be that represents seven times the capital
117
00:05:55.400 --> 00:05:58.300
expenditures for the company. We're not going to sacrifice that
118
00:05:58.300 --> 00:06:01.100
so let's explode the mine and dig the iron
119
00:06:01.100 --> 00:06:01.600
ore.
120
00:06:02.600 --> 00:06:05.600
There's a price to pay for that at that
121
00:06:05.600 --> 00:06:08.300
time. The Norwegian Sovereign fun said I'm
122
00:06:08.300 --> 00:06:11.400
going to sell my state because it's really all for
123
00:06:11.400 --> 00:06:14.300
inside. The CEO is out an additional to
124
00:06:14.300 --> 00:06:17.500
senior executives are out. That's it. And now
125
00:06:17.500 --> 00:06:19.800
there's a long list of penalties paid by the company.
126
00:06:20.800 --> 00:06:23.700
27 points per million pounds in 2017
127
00:06:23.700 --> 00:06:26.300
because of financial conduct also
128
00:06:26.300 --> 00:06:29.300
Richie difficulties Kenny cut
129
00:06:29.300 --> 00:06:33.100
copper a terrible one 1989 20
130
00:06:32.100 --> 00:06:36.400
million dollars the same one in 2007 an
131
00:06:35.400 --> 00:06:38.500
additional 15 plus 5 million
132
00:06:38.500 --> 00:06:41.500
dollars, etc. Etc. And again the
133
00:06:41.500 --> 00:06:42.700
list is long but
134
00:06:43.600 --> 00:06:46.500
Are the figures big enough to really change
135
00:06:46.500 --> 00:06:47.900
the behavior of the company?
136
00:06:48.400 --> 00:06:50.600
Of course, they are alternative path.
137
00:06:51.300 --> 00:06:55.100
Rio Tinto in Canada, for example history, it's aluminum
138
00:06:54.100 --> 00:06:57.500
with alkan and its iron always
139
00:06:57.500 --> 00:07:00.600
iron ore of Canada the Canadian operations of
140
00:07:00.600 --> 00:07:03.400
a company had a terrible reputation and they decided
141
00:07:03.400 --> 00:07:06.400
to change the behavior even though they are
142
00:07:06.400 --> 00:07:09.800
some problems still remaining moving from
143
00:07:09.800 --> 00:07:12.200
terrible reputation to cooperation with
144
00:07:12.200 --> 00:07:15.800
people and good citizenship. Very simply in
145
00:07:15.800 --> 00:07:18.600
December 2022. The cabin
146
00:07:18.600 --> 00:07:21.200
is silent major all tall a long term one
147
00:07:21.200 --> 00:07:22.400
more than 50 years.
148
00:07:23.200 --> 00:07:27.400
Between Rio Tinto and the First Nations locally in
149
00:07:26.400 --> 00:07:29.500
Eno the name is I don't
150
00:07:29.500 --> 00:07:33.000
want to pronounce because I don't want to make it wrong. But the translation
151
00:07:32.300 --> 00:07:35.700
into English is the wind is turning the wind
152
00:07:35.700 --> 00:07:39.500
is turning is at tomorrow. It's going to be different from yesterday at
153
00:07:38.500 --> 00:07:40.100
least hopefully.
154
00:07:41.100 --> 00:07:44.100
Rialto is probably not the worst in class. There's a
155
00:07:44.100 --> 00:07:47.300
company in Brazil, which is unfortunately well known and whose name
156
00:07:47.300 --> 00:07:51.200
is Valley Valley experienced to disasters quite
157
00:07:50.200 --> 00:07:53.400
similar disasters in only three
158
00:07:53.400 --> 00:07:57.500
years. The last one is absolutely awful. He's brumadinho.
159
00:07:56.500 --> 00:07:59.600
It's a collapse of tellings. Damn.
160
00:08:00.200 --> 00:08:03.300
Took place in 2019. You know that
161
00:08:03.300 --> 00:08:06.400
when you have an open mind, you put the tailing somewhere
162
00:08:06.400 --> 00:08:09.200
you create a dam and you hope that the dam does not
163
00:08:09.200 --> 00:08:12.100
collapse which it did the canteen was
164
00:08:12.100 --> 00:08:15.300
just underneath and people were taking their lash when
165
00:08:15.300 --> 00:08:19.400
it happened 270 people died and
166
00:08:18.400 --> 00:08:21.300
it's a consequence of yours and
167
00:08:21.300 --> 00:08:25.500
yours of yours of safety rules easing you
168
00:08:25.500 --> 00:08:28.400
invest and spend less unless unsafe tea and
169
00:08:28.400 --> 00:08:31.600
a consequence of that is at 270 people are going
170
00:08:31.600 --> 00:08:34.400
to lose their lives and it's tragic for their families as
171
00:08:34.400 --> 00:08:37.300
well. The economist qualified that as
172
00:08:37.300 --> 00:08:40.600
a raptured capitalism let loose
173
00:08:41.500 --> 00:08:44.300
Of course after that you set an action plan
174
00:08:44.300 --> 00:08:47.800
using the CEO you attack a few others. We
175
00:08:47.800 --> 00:08:50.500
are going to pay the fine. We are going to pay the penalty and
176
00:08:50.500 --> 00:08:53.300
then you start communicating. We are going to be great guys.
177
00:08:53.300 --> 00:08:56.700
Now your point independent directors,
178
00:08:56.700 --> 00:08:59.600
you create a group work some group works
179
00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:02.800
and so on so forth you sponsor ngos,
180
00:09:02.800 --> 00:09:05.300
you provide financial support you try to improve
181
00:09:05.300 --> 00:09:08.700
your ESG already, etc, etc. Right, but if
182
00:09:08.700 --> 00:09:10.900
you don't change your campaign, it's worth nothing.
183
00:09:11.700 --> 00:09:14.600
You have to change a company. You have to change the mindset the
184
00:09:14.600 --> 00:09:17.600
mentality of the company the values the
185
00:09:17.600 --> 00:09:20.200
weather company is deciding is taking
186
00:09:20.200 --> 00:09:22.000
its decisions a processes.
187
00:09:23.300 --> 00:09:26.400
Where we stand today the consequence of Decades of
188
00:09:26.400 --> 00:09:29.000
bad behavior. How long is it going to
189
00:09:29.400 --> 00:09:32.500
take to close? The credibility gap decades game.
190
00:09:33.400 --> 00:09:36.100
But now on the picture there should
191
00:09:36.100 --> 00:09:39.800
be some but they're back on stage the shareholders. What
192
00:09:39.800 --> 00:09:42.800
is a real power of shareholders because of
193
00:09:42.800 --> 00:09:45.500
the end of the day, what is the cost for the shareholders
194
00:09:45.500 --> 00:09:48.500
of the fair the penalty which is going to be paid by
195
00:09:48.500 --> 00:09:51.300
ballet is probably seven billion dollars,
196
00:09:51.300 --> 00:09:55.000
at least it's commitment. We are going to see the reality behind
197
00:09:54.300 --> 00:09:57.400
that there is also kind of lots of
198
00:09:57.400 --> 00:10:00.600
credibility with the stock market authorities on a
199
00:10:00.600 --> 00:10:04.100
change Commission in August 2022. Okay, guys,
200
00:10:03.100 --> 00:10:06.800
you many polluted information you
201
00:10:06.800 --> 00:10:09.600
provided through Duluth information you use
202
00:10:09.600 --> 00:10:12.100
that it was wrong what using of course the company said?
203
00:10:12.100 --> 00:10:16.000
Absolutely. No, but Zack he's a serious institution. What
204
00:10:15.200 --> 00:10:18.600
is the impact on the stock price? You remember
205
00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:21.300
radio tento the value of the company should
206
00:10:21.300 --> 00:10:24.300
be four times. It's Capital employees only two times. If
207
00:10:24.300 --> 00:10:27.500
you look at the return Capital employed after tax
208
00:10:27.500 --> 00:10:30.300
of ballet justifies a market the
209
00:10:30.300 --> 00:10:31.700
book of seven to eight.
210
00:10:32.400 --> 00:10:36.400
What is the actual Market to book it's 2.25.
211
00:10:35.400 --> 00:10:38.300
The Enterprise Value is
212
00:10:38.300 --> 00:10:42.000
let's simplify the figures about 90 billion Capital
213
00:10:41.600 --> 00:10:44.700
employed invested capital is about 40 billion
214
00:10:44.700 --> 00:10:48.300
90 divided by 40 is 2.25 but
215
00:10:47.300 --> 00:10:50.500
it should be seven to
216
00:10:50.500 --> 00:10:54.300
eight if you multiply 40 by 7.5 you
217
00:10:53.300 --> 00:10:56.400
get three hundred billion dollars. So
218
00:10:56.400 --> 00:10:59.800
the company says, oh we are worth more than the book values. This
219
00:10:59.800 --> 00:11:02.500
is absolutely wrong. The company should
220
00:11:02.500 --> 00:11:06.000
not be worth a price value 90 but 300 you
221
00:11:05.500 --> 00:11:08.700
understand that there is no opportunity loss of
222
00:11:08.700 --> 00:11:11.500
two hundred and ten billion dollars for
223
00:11:11.500 --> 00:11:14.800
the shareholders which represents 30 times
224
00:11:14.800 --> 00:11:17.400
the penalty which is going to be bad by the
225
00:11:17.400 --> 00:11:19.900
company. It's absolutely huge.
226
00:11:21.300 --> 00:11:23.100
So we know about value.
227
00:11:23.800 --> 00:11:26.800
We know about values. You
228
00:11:26.800 --> 00:11:29.400
understand that this Behavior as a terrible
229
00:11:29.400 --> 00:11:32.200
impact on people. They're losing their life
230
00:11:32.200 --> 00:11:35.100
and the planet and the sustainability of the planet.
231
00:11:35.800 --> 00:11:38.300
And some companies are mentioning people or planet
232
00:11:38.300 --> 00:11:41.700
and profit. What about profit, you know, very cynical Behavior
233
00:11:41.700 --> 00:11:44.200
might be as long as a benefits of not doing
234
00:11:44.200 --> 00:11:47.300
the job or more than the fights. We're paying. Let's keep
235
00:11:47.300 --> 00:11:51.600
on that's not only cynical that wrong economically
236
00:11:50.600 --> 00:11:53.200
because the profit is
237
00:11:53.200 --> 00:11:54.400
not the p&l.
238
00:11:54.900 --> 00:11:57.200
You remember that the prophet is concept which goes
239
00:11:57.200 --> 00:12:00.700
merge beyond the p&n. It's not profit. It's
240
00:12:00.700 --> 00:12:03.200
performance. And of course it's performance, which is
241
00:12:03.200 --> 00:12:06.700
driving value. But how do you access value?
242
00:12:06.700 --> 00:12:09.400
You remember discounted cash flows and
243
00:12:09.400 --> 00:12:12.400
so on so first so the value is a consequence
244
00:12:12.400 --> 00:12:15.100
of the bit which is transformed into free cash flows after
245
00:12:15.100 --> 00:12:19.000
you took into account Capital expenditures and so on discounted that
246
00:12:18.200 --> 00:12:21.300
the cost of capital and the walk is
247
00:12:21.300 --> 00:12:24.400
very much a consequence of the risk the risk as it is
248
00:12:24.400 --> 00:12:27.400
perceived by the investors today is no
249
00:12:27.400 --> 00:12:30.800
trust there's a huge information asymmetry. There's
250
00:12:30.800 --> 00:12:33.300
plenty of great washing. There's a
251
00:12:33.300 --> 00:12:36.600
risk which is perceived by investors. It's very high and as
252
00:12:36.600 --> 00:12:39.600
a consequence the value is much lower than
253
00:12:39.600 --> 00:12:42.700
what each should be if there is perception walls
254
00:12:42.700 --> 00:12:44.200
reasonably normal.
255
00:12:45.100 --> 00:12:48.500
ESG is obviously a moral obligation. But
256
00:12:48.500 --> 00:12:51.700
ESG is not only immoral obligation. It's
257
00:12:51.700 --> 00:12:54.900
about value creation and a
258
00:12:54.900 --> 00:12:57.700
value creation, which is a growing concern among
259
00:12:57.700 --> 00:13:00.400
investors. This is why you see
260
00:13:00.400 --> 00:13:04.200
the gap which is starting in 2017 and widening
261
00:13:03.200 --> 00:13:05.500
throughout the years.
262
00:13:06.300 --> 00:13:07.800
as a matter of conclusion
263
00:13:08.400 --> 00:13:11.500
communication is nothing you really have
264
00:13:11.500 --> 00:13:15.100
to change the processes of the company mindset
265
00:13:14.100 --> 00:13:16.800
values decisions.
266
00:13:17.900 --> 00:13:21.700
In order to improve the ESG performance
267
00:13:20.700 --> 00:13:23.100
the real one of the
268
00:13:23.100 --> 00:13:26.600
companies on the one which we come in a case and that's
269
00:13:26.600 --> 00:13:30.300
not ESG for the stakeholders. That's ESG
270
00:13:29.300 --> 00:13:33.000
for the shareholders. And for
271
00:13:32.300 --> 00:13:35.800
the stakeholders. It's not ASG shareholders
272
00:13:35.800 --> 00:13:38.800
against stakeholders. There's
273
00:13:38.800 --> 00:13:41.600
a perfect alignment of interest between
274
00:13:41.600 --> 00:13:44.100
these two communities. At least
275
00:13:44.100 --> 00:13:48.000
this is what I try to demonstrate you. This is my deep conviction.
276
00:13:49.200 --> 00:13:49.800
Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to the second film which is devoted to Rio Tinto and the relationship between market value and ESG environment society and governance.
You remember that Rio Tito is operating in a mining industry.
It's an Anglo Australian company and what we observed during the first film is that the capital is performance was justifying a market to book Enterprise Value divided by Capital employed of four times.
The cabinet should be worth four times the amount of money which is invested in the business operations.
And what did we observe the market value was only representing twice the capital employed.
That's obviously the consequence of the major credibility gap, which we try to explain now can the particular specific ESG profile of radio Tinto or the mining industry at large be regarded as an explanatory factor for this huge difference between expected value and actual value.
That's not a small issue.
The answer is really a financial issue because the company's worth twice should be worth four times the difference between four and two is two and then the difference represents twice a capital employed, which is only 110 billion dollars.
So it's absolutely not negligible.
We need to Deep dive into this Gap.
Very interestingly.
When did we start observing the Gap 2017 you remember that in all my films? I always make the correlation for industrial firms between the return capital and the market to book the market to book measures a relative value creation and in return Capital the economic performance of the company what we observe throughout the years of the company is a perfect consistency between the return capital in the market the book up to 20 16 2017.
There's a little bit of Gap and the Gap is widening.
But the return capital is very interesting Indie gear.
It's not the performance the financial performance of a company consists in confronting the return capital of the tax and the way that average cost of capital and there's a very interesting Financial indicator which consists in confronting these two calculating the return Capital after tax divided by the work to measure something which might be the theoretical Market to book assuming there's no growth in the free cash flow.
Then if you look at the financial performance, this is what your Market to book should be.
And then we confront that with what the market to book actually is.
We have exactly the same conclusion perfect consistency up to 2016 a gap starting in 2017.
And the Gap is widening from 2017 on of course.
We can't find an explanation for 2021 at that time exceptional row materials prices.
So you could argue that investors considers that it's exceptional not sustainable.
It declines 2021.
It does not explain 2018-2019 and 2020.
Now we have to look at the ESG track record of Rio Tinto e and s first and then a little bit later G.
What about environment you remember the first thing I was mentioning it difficult start in Spain with toxic smokes at that time the company communicated.
This is the inevitable consequences of technical progress.
Are you against progress? No? As well probably a confusion between tactical progress and societal progress, but that has a story later on even mouth in the six days much Beyond acceptable lead content.
It's about pollution.
It's about health.
It's about safety the very well known Kruger National Park in South Africa.
There's close to the park.
There is a corporate mine which is named parabaro, which is very likely producing some contamination of Flora and Fauna.
Let's move on with the list acquisition in 1989 of Kenneth copper copper mining huge difficulties with a flammable mining site in Wisconsin, Utah and a grand water contamination huge right on biodiversity in Madagascar, etc.
Etc.
Etc.
The list is very long.
That's for eel.
Let's move to a society.
Permanent constant violations of labor laws in 2022.
The capital is suing a report which confesses gender and racial discrimination and harassment they are very violent labor disputes.
And sometimes the capital is accused of corporating was governance which are less and acceptable in terms of Human Rights and so on so forth last but not least the capital is showing little respect for local communities.
A very good and recent example is back in 2020.
We are in Western Australia the Duke and Gorge.
It's an Aboriginal site which demonstrate the presence of human beings the last 46,000 years and it's a sacred site for the local community.
But the CEO says you know what underneath we have 100 answer 35 million dollars worth of iron ore for a few Stone.
We are not going to sacrify that because the one Harrison 35 million dollars are going to create 70% of it down and they'd be that represents seven times the capital expenditures for the company.
We're not going to sacrifice that so let's explode the mine and dig the iron ore.
There's a price to pay for that at that time.
The Norwegian Sovereign fun said I'm going to sell my state because it's really all for inside.
The CEO is out an additional to senior executives are out.
That's it.
And now there's a long list of penalties paid by the company.
27 points per million pounds in 2017 because of financial conduct also Richie difficulties Kenny cut copper a terrible one 1989 20 million dollars the same one in 2007 an additional 15 plus 5 million dollars, etc.
Etc.
And again the list is long but Are the figures big enough to really change the behavior of the company? Of course, they are alternative path.
Rio Tinto in Canada, for example history, it's aluminum with alkan and its iron always iron ore of Canada the Canadian operations of a company had a terrible reputation and they decided to change the behavior even though they are some problems still remaining moving from terrible reputation to cooperation with people and good citizenship.
Very simply in December 2022.
The cabin is silent major all tall a long term one more than 50 years.
Between Rio Tinto and the First Nations locally in Eno the name is I don't want to pronounce because I don't want to make it wrong.
But the translation into English is the wind is turning the wind is turning is at tomorrow.
It's going to be different from yesterday at least hopefully.
Rialto is probably not the worst in class.
There's a company in Brazil, which is unfortunately well known and whose name is Valley Valley experienced to disasters quite similar disasters in only three years.
The last one is absolutely awful.
He's brumadinho.
It's a collapse of tellings.
Damn.
Took place in 2019.
You know that when you have an open mind, you put the tailing somewhere you create a dam and you hope that the dam does not collapse which it did the canteen was just underneath and people were taking their lash when it happened 270 people died and it's a consequence of yours and yours of yours of safety rules easing you invest and spend less unless unsafe tea and a consequence of that is at 270 people are going to lose their lives and it's tragic for their families as well.
The economist qualified that as a raptured capitalism let loose Of course after that you set an action plan using the CEO you attack a few others.
We are going to pay the fine.
We are going to pay the penalty and then you start communicating.
We are going to be great guys.
Now your point independent directors, you create a group work some group works and so on so forth you sponsor ngos, you provide financial support you try to improve your ESG already, etc, etc.
Right, but if you don't change your campaign, it's worth nothing.
You have to change a company.
You have to change the mindset the mentality of the company the values the weather company is deciding is taking its decisions a processes.
Where we stand today the consequence of Decades of bad behavior.
How long is it going to take to close? The credibility gap decades game.
But now on the picture there should be some but they're back on stage the shareholders.
What is a real power of shareholders because of the end of the day, what is the cost for the shareholders of the fair the penalty which is going to be paid by ballet is probably seven billion dollars, at least it's commitment.
We are going to see the reality behind that there is also kind of lots of credibility with the stock market authorities on a change Commission in August 2022.
Okay, guys, you many polluted information you provided through Duluth information you use that it was wrong what using of course the company said? Absolutely.
No, but Zack he's a serious institution.
What is the impact on the stock price? You remember radio tento the value of the company should be four times.
It's Capital employees only two times.
If you look at the return Capital employed after tax of ballet justifies a market the book of seven to eight.
What is the actual Market to book it's 2.25.
The Enterprise Value is let's simplify the figures about 90 billion Capital employed invested capital is about 40 billion 90 divided by 40 is 2.25 but it should be seven to eight if you multiply 40 by 7.5 you get three hundred billion dollars.
So the company says, oh we are worth more than the book values.
This is absolutely wrong.
The company should not be worth a price value 90 but 300 you understand that there is no opportunity loss of two hundred and ten billion dollars for the shareholders which represents 30 times the penalty which is going to be bad by the company.
It's absolutely huge.
So we know about value.
We know about values.
You understand that this Behavior as a terrible impact on people.
They're losing their life and the planet and the sustainability of the planet.
And some companies are mentioning people or planet and profit.
What about profit, you know, very cynical Behavior might be as long as a benefits of not doing the job or more than the fights.
We're paying.
Let's keep on that's not only cynical that wrong economically because the profit is not the p&l.
You remember that the prophet is concept which goes merge beyond the p&n.
It's not profit.
It's performance.
And of course it's performance, which is driving value.
But how do you access value? You remember discounted cash flows and so on so first so the value is a consequence of the bit which is transformed into free cash flows after you took into account Capital expenditures and so on discounted that the cost of capital and the walk is very much a consequence of the risk the risk as it is perceived by the investors today is no trust there's a huge information asymmetry.
There's plenty of great washing.
There's a risk which is perceived by investors.
It's very high and as a consequence the value is much lower than what each should be if there is perception walls reasonably normal.
ESG is obviously a moral obligation.
But ESG is not only immoral obligation.
It's about value creation and a value creation, which is a growing concern among investors.
This is why you see the gap which is starting in 2017 and widening throughout the years.
as a matter of conclusion communication is nothing you really have to change the processes of the company mindset values decisions.
In order to improve the ESG performance the real one of the companies on the one which we come in a case and that's not ESG for the stakeholders.
That's ESG for the shareholders.
And for the stakeholders.
It's not ASG shareholders against stakeholders.
There's a perfect alignment of interest between these two communities.
At least this is what I try to demonstrate you.
This is my deep conviction.
Thank you very much.