Educational film, April 2025 // $5 billion for CATL and BYD
The financial constancy of the Chinese automotive economy
BYD (Build Your Dreams) and CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited) are two Chinese industrial giants in the clean technology and energy sector. Although they have different specialities – BYD being a car manufacturer and CATL a battery manufacturer – they share a number of economic commonalities, particularly in the context of the global energy transition. Professor Jacquet paints an eloquent portrait of them.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:07.465 --> 00:00:11.215
Hello and welcome to this educational film, which is going
2
00:00:11.215 --> 00:00:13.935
to deal with one figure and two companies.
3
00:00:14.195 --> 00:00:17.095
The figure is $5 billion plus
4
00:00:17.915 --> 00:00:21.575
and the two companies are BY, D and cattle.
5
00:00:23.045 --> 00:00:25.695
What do these two companies have in common?
6
00:00:25.805 --> 00:00:27.535
They are first born in China.
7
00:00:27.845 --> 00:00:29.895
They are mainly operating in China.
8
00:00:30.245 --> 00:00:32.975
They are 100% Chinese corporations.
9
00:00:33.485 --> 00:00:35.415
They both operate in the same industry,
10
00:00:35.415 --> 00:00:37.055
which is the automotive industry.
11
00:00:37.975 --> 00:00:40.655
BYD is about batteries and cars.
12
00:00:41.195 --> 00:00:45.375
Cattle is about batteries and maybe tomorrow cars as well.
13
00:00:46.165 --> 00:00:48.415
It's about the electrical vehicle.
14
00:00:48.645 --> 00:00:50.175
Nothing to do with the terminal.
15
00:00:50.495 --> 00:00:52.975
NGM, it's about the EV
16
00:00:53.195 --> 00:00:55.495
and these two companies are quite recent.
17
00:00:56.245 --> 00:01:00.535
They were not created decades ago, quite recently
18
00:01:00.715 --> 00:01:05.215
and extremely successful in terms of growth in the revenues
19
00:01:05.475 --> 00:01:09.415
and in terms of value creation as well for the investors.
20
00:01:10.355 --> 00:01:13.135
If we look at the evolution of the revenues generated
21
00:01:13.235 --> 00:01:14.855
by respectively, BYD
22
00:01:15.095 --> 00:01:18.615
and cattle, we observed that it was slow moving up
23
00:01:18.615 --> 00:01:22.215
to a few years ago and it started skyrocketing.
24
00:01:22.215 --> 00:01:25.895
If you look at the current BYD revenues
25
00:01:26.075 --> 00:01:29.695
2024, it's more than $100 billion,
26
00:01:30.155 --> 00:01:31.895
so it's not a startup anymore.
27
00:01:32.205 --> 00:01:35.615
It's a very big company which is fast growing.
28
00:01:35.885 --> 00:01:39.495
What about cattle? Cattle is about half the size of BYD.
29
00:01:40.115 --> 00:01:42.455
It started getting up recently.
30
00:01:42.875 --> 00:01:44.215
It was dramatic growth
31
00:01:44.995 --> 00:01:48.615
and if you look at 24, there's a kind of stabilization,
32
00:01:49.275 --> 00:01:51.895
but we are going to discover the potential for growth
33
00:01:52.715 --> 00:01:55.375
for BYD and certainly for cattle.
34
00:01:56.395 --> 00:01:59.175
Now what about value creation? What about the stock price?
35
00:01:59.665 --> 00:02:02.735
These companies were recently for cattle
36
00:02:02.915 --> 00:02:07.255
and a bit far ago for BYD listed on the sheen
37
00:02:07.435 --> 00:02:09.695
and now on the Hong Kong stock exchange.
38
00:02:10.315 --> 00:02:13.375
And if you look at the original stock price, it was not
39
00:02:13.445 --> 00:02:17.335
that brilliant except that from 2019
40
00:02:17.475 --> 00:02:21.775
to 2021, the stock price mul multiplied by five
41
00:02:22.475 --> 00:02:24.975
in two years, which is an outstanding performance.
42
00:02:24.975 --> 00:02:28.695
Now there seems to be a kind of plateauing this last year,
43
00:02:28.755 --> 00:02:30.855
but the question is how does it compare
44
00:02:30.925 --> 00:02:33.015
with the Hong Kong stock exchange?
45
00:02:33.635 --> 00:02:36.135
And that's a very interesting observation.
46
00:02:36.725 --> 00:02:39.535
When the stock price was flat for these two companies,
47
00:02:39.535 --> 00:02:44.215
it was quite flat for the Hong index and then it went up
48
00:02:44.325 --> 00:02:47.615
because of these companies, not because of the market.
49
00:02:48.315 --> 00:02:51.735
And if you look at the last year, the Hoang index was down
50
00:02:52.715 --> 00:02:55.455
and both companies show some resilience,
51
00:02:56.195 --> 00:03:00.165
so cattle is down not as much as the hang saying
52
00:03:00.585 --> 00:03:04.205
and BYD is down not as much as cattle.
53
00:03:04.505 --> 00:03:06.085
So you understand that there is kind
54
00:03:06.085 --> 00:03:08.125
of resilience in the value creation
55
00:03:08.275 --> 00:03:11.325
because of the prospects investors have in mind about
56
00:03:11.325 --> 00:03:12.405
these two companies.
57
00:03:13.305 --> 00:03:17.885
Now let's move to BYD first. You know, build your dream.
58
00:03:17.885 --> 00:03:19.965
Build your dream is not the name of the company.
59
00:03:19.995 --> 00:03:22.405
It's a kind of motto for marketing reasons.
60
00:03:23.025 --> 00:03:26.925
The name of the company initially is Yadi Electronics.
61
00:03:27.075 --> 00:03:30.725
They added a B and it became B Yadis.
62
00:03:30.725 --> 00:03:34.005
This is the name the company was created in 1995
63
00:03:34.265 --> 00:03:35.725
by one Trunk fu.
64
00:03:36.505 --> 00:03:39.645
At the very beginning it was about rechargeable batteries
65
00:03:39.825 --> 00:03:42.005
and predominantly for mobile phones.
66
00:03:42.785 --> 00:03:43.845
In 2012,
67
00:03:44.105 --> 00:03:48.445
the company has more than a 50% market share in a mobile
68
00:03:48.955 --> 00:03:51.045
battery rechargeable battery.
69
00:03:51.545 --> 00:03:56.405
The company went public in 2002 and a few weeks
70
00:03:56.495 --> 00:03:58.765
after the IPO, the company announced
71
00:03:58.765 --> 00:04:00.605
that they were getting into the car business
72
00:04:01.115 --> 00:04:05.125
with the acquisition of Han Wan automobile.
73
00:04:05.885 --> 00:04:09.365
Interestingly, this acquisition was not even mentioned
74
00:04:09.365 --> 00:04:12.685
as a prospect in the IPO prospectus
75
00:04:12.685 --> 00:04:16.085
and the investors were a little bit emotion by the fact
76
00:04:16.085 --> 00:04:17.525
that the information was missing.
77
00:04:17.915 --> 00:04:19.005
Okay, that's another story.
78
00:04:19.225 --> 00:04:21.965
Now the company starts in the electrical vehicle
79
00:04:22.745 --> 00:04:25.325
and start with a plugging hybrid vehicle.
80
00:04:25.545 --> 00:04:29.645
It is 2008, 2009 electric vehicle
81
00:04:30.385 --> 00:04:33.005
and now they are an extremely strong
82
00:04:33.005 --> 00:04:34.205
player in this business.
83
00:04:35.115 --> 00:04:39.885
Just for the fund. In 2008, Berkshire Hadaway Warren Buffet
84
00:04:40.815 --> 00:04:44.245
takes about 10% of BYD
85
00:04:44.385 --> 00:04:47.125
for eight Hong Kong dollars per share.
86
00:04:47.715 --> 00:04:52.605
It's a cash out of $230 million, so it's quite significant,
87
00:04:53.305 --> 00:04:57.165
but if you look at the stock price in 2025 today,
88
00:04:57.305 --> 00:05:01.165
the price is $382.50.
89
00:05:01.625 --> 00:05:04.885
The day I am recording this film, you understand
90
00:05:04.885 --> 00:05:06.765
that the initial investment made
91
00:05:06.765 --> 00:05:09.805
by Berkshire Hadaway was multiplied by 48
92
00:05:10.545 --> 00:05:14.885
and today the value of this investment is $11 billion.
93
00:05:14.995 --> 00:05:17.685
This is not bad if you compare the initial investment
94
00:05:17.745 --> 00:05:19.365
of 230 million.
95
00:05:20.425 --> 00:05:23.445
Warren Buffet always said, it's not my credit,
96
00:05:23.555 --> 00:05:26.085
it's the credit of my partner Charlie Munger.
97
00:05:26.225 --> 00:05:28.845
He had the idea congratulations
98
00:05:28.945 --> 00:05:30.205
and that's a great investment.
99
00:05:30.545 --> 00:05:32.485
Now, initially they had 10%.
100
00:05:32.495 --> 00:05:35.165
Today they have a little bit less than 5%
101
00:05:35.435 --> 00:05:39.125
because it's a bit easier in terms of publication
102
00:05:39.345 --> 00:05:42.525
and reporting as far as the value of the asset is concerned.
103
00:05:42.715 --> 00:05:46.045
Initially B widely was in a battery business.
104
00:05:46.315 --> 00:05:48.445
They progressively move to the car business
105
00:05:48.505 --> 00:05:52.165
and today the automotive business is producing 80%
106
00:05:52.225 --> 00:05:53.685
of their revenue, so it's quite
107
00:05:54.045 --> 00:05:55.405
dominant, no doubt about that.
108
00:05:55.705 --> 00:05:58.485
The revenue is generated by the company in 2024.
109
00:05:58.885 --> 00:06:01.285
I said a bit more than $100 billion,
110
00:06:01.515 --> 00:06:04.005
exactly $107 billion.
111
00:06:04.545 --> 00:06:08.965
In the meantime, same year Tesla announced 98 billion.
112
00:06:09.345 --> 00:06:11.085
Now BYD is billions
113
00:06:11.085 --> 00:06:15.725
and Tesla, more vehicles 4.3 million,
114
00:06:16.305 --> 00:06:17.805
but it combines hybrid
115
00:06:18.545 --> 00:06:22.325
and ev, it's about 32% market share in China,
116
00:06:22.545 --> 00:06:26.005
so it's the biggest EV company in China,
117
00:06:26.665 --> 00:06:30.125
and electric vehicles represent a bit more than 50%
118
00:06:30.125 --> 00:06:32.765
of the total vehicles which are sold in China.
119
00:06:33.545 --> 00:06:36.085
How does it compare with Tesla in terms of number
120
00:06:36.085 --> 00:06:40.005
of vehicles, no hybrid of any kind of Tesla, just EV
121
00:06:40.625 --> 00:06:44.645
1.8 million, which is much less than 4.3 million.
122
00:06:45.115 --> 00:06:46.765
They are not sold on the same price.
123
00:06:47.145 --> 00:06:50.845
Now in terms of volume B widely looks much bigger than Tesla
124
00:06:51.585 --> 00:06:54.965
in terms of market capitalization, it's a different story
125
00:06:55.785 --> 00:06:59.405
The day I'm recording this film, the stock market value,
126
00:06:59.425 --> 00:07:03.765
the market capitalization of BYD is $150 billion,
127
00:07:04.175 --> 00:07:05.485
which is not negligible,
128
00:07:05.825 --> 00:07:09.565
but Tesla is $850 billion.
129
00:07:10.665 --> 00:07:13.645
The founder of the company was Mr. Wong Chan Fu.
130
00:07:14.385 --> 00:07:18.965
His wealth is estimated by Forbes $28 billion.
131
00:07:19.595 --> 00:07:21.125
This is a commercial success
132
00:07:21.145 --> 00:07:23.605
but it is also a personal success as far as
133
00:07:24.165 --> 00:07:25.245
personal wealth is concerned.
134
00:07:25.385 --> 00:07:26.485
Now let's move to cattle.
135
00:07:27.185 --> 00:07:31.725
Cattle means contemporary and Parex X technology limited.
136
00:07:32.145 --> 00:07:35.165
At the very beginning it was just named Amper X technology
137
00:07:35.825 --> 00:07:40.605
and it was in the electronic competence acquired by TDK,
138
00:07:41.265 --> 00:07:43.485
the Japanese company in this kind of industry
139
00:07:43.485 --> 00:07:46.165
with energy mobile IOT and so
140
00:07:46.165 --> 00:07:49.205
and so first, the part of the business which is devoted
141
00:07:49.205 --> 00:07:53.805
to the electric vehicle is spun off in 2011 from TDK.
142
00:07:54.785 --> 00:07:58.125
Now the company immediately signed a corporation agreement
143
00:07:58.305 --> 00:08:01.325
in 2012 with the joint venture
144
00:08:01.465 --> 00:08:04.165
of BMW is brilliance in China.
145
00:08:04.625 --> 00:08:08.125
Now BMW is dominant in the joint venture
146
00:08:08.745 --> 00:08:11.685
and it's a very important starting point in terms
147
00:08:11.705 --> 00:08:15.005
of agreement with large car manufacturers.
148
00:08:15.705 --> 00:08:17.685
Now the company is extremely successful
149
00:08:18.265 --> 00:08:22.205
in 2016 there are number three behind PANACEK
150
00:08:22.465 --> 00:08:26.485
and BYD in terms of batteries for electric vehicles.
151
00:08:26.875 --> 00:08:29.525
This is 20 16 20 17.
152
00:08:29.595 --> 00:08:31.885
They moved from number three to number one
153
00:08:32.025 --> 00:08:34.845
and they are still number one by far.
154
00:08:35.225 --> 00:08:37.285
If you look at the statistics which are produced
155
00:08:37.385 --> 00:08:40.485
by a research center based in Korea cattle
156
00:08:40.865 --> 00:08:44.405
for the period January to December, 2024,
157
00:08:44.875 --> 00:08:48.445
it's 38% worldwide market share for
158
00:08:49.065 --> 00:08:53.485
EV batteries number two, but quite far now is BYD.
159
00:08:53.555 --> 00:08:56.245
Then you have a few players and so on so forth.
160
00:08:56.545 --> 00:08:59.925
One is a bit more than 10%, the rest is 4% or less.
161
00:09:00.425 --> 00:09:02.565
So you understand that the company's corporately
162
00:09:03.045 --> 00:09:04.285
dominant worldwide.
163
00:09:04.765 --> 00:09:06.885
BYD was listed in 2002.
164
00:09:06.985 --> 00:09:11.005
Cattle was listed more recently in 2018
165
00:09:12.045 --> 00:09:14.725
IPO just on the Xang Z stock market.
166
00:09:14.865 --> 00:09:16.405
So it's about a shares
167
00:09:16.785 --> 00:09:19.765
and ahas are reserves to investors
168
00:09:20.315 --> 00:09:24.925
operating in mainland China, which is quite interesting,
169
00:09:25.225 --> 00:09:26.965
but you are not open to the world
170
00:09:27.025 --> 00:09:29.325
and this is why the day you need money you need
171
00:09:29.325 --> 00:09:32.565
to probably broaden a little bit to scope in terms of
172
00:09:33.545 --> 00:09:37.725
internationalization of the investors funds raised at
173
00:09:37.725 --> 00:09:42.605
that time 760 million US dollars for a valuation
174
00:09:42.865 --> 00:09:44.205
of 11 billion.
175
00:09:45.025 --> 00:09:48.045
To date, it's a little bit more 2018
176
00:09:49.195 --> 00:09:53.925
factory in Germany for BNW announcement of a cooperation
177
00:09:53.925 --> 00:09:57.485
with Ford Electric vehicles Mustang
178
00:09:58.045 --> 00:10:01.205
Electric F 150 electric
179
00:10:01.385 --> 00:10:04.845
and also a plant which is going to be built in Michigan,
180
00:10:05.795 --> 00:10:08.565
same year announcement of a plant in Europe,
181
00:10:08.795 --> 00:10:12.885
central Europe in Hungary in 2023.
182
00:10:13.185 --> 00:10:15.685
The company is number eight in terms
183
00:10:15.705 --> 00:10:17.965
of patents produced in the world.
184
00:10:18.505 --> 00:10:22.565
So the company is very much invested in innovation research
185
00:10:22.565 --> 00:10:25.485
and the abundance is protecting its intellectual
186
00:10:25.485 --> 00:10:26.885
properties throughout the world.
187
00:10:27.665 --> 00:10:30.245
2024 a year ago agreement
188
00:10:30.395 --> 00:10:33.125
with stellantis, you remember that St.
189
00:10:33.355 --> 00:10:35.925
STIs is PSA plus Chrysler
190
00:10:36.665 --> 00:10:40.085
and they are going to create a joint venture 50 50,
191
00:10:40.555 --> 00:10:43.725
another factory now in Spain, which is going
192
00:10:43.725 --> 00:10:46.725
to cost a little bit more than 4 billion euros.
193
00:10:47.505 --> 00:10:50.365
If you pile up all the investments which were announced
194
00:10:50.385 --> 00:10:54.205
by the company, it's about 14 billion US dollars.
195
00:10:54.795 --> 00:10:56.405
It's quite a large amount of money
196
00:10:56.625 --> 00:10:58.045
and you need some financing.
197
00:10:58.435 --> 00:11:00.765
This will be addressed a little bit later.
198
00:11:00.955 --> 00:11:04.485
What is the valuation today roughly is the same as B,
199
00:11:04.665 --> 00:11:07.845
widely $150 billion.
200
00:11:08.585 --> 00:11:10.405
The founder of the company, Mr.
201
00:11:10.705 --> 00:11:13.965
Jan Hun, has an equity stake in the company
202
00:11:14.185 --> 00:11:17.085
and Forbes evaluates his own wealth at the level
203
00:11:17.105 --> 00:11:18.765
of $36 billion.
204
00:11:19.135 --> 00:11:21.725
Again, it's a fantastic commercial success
205
00:11:22.025 --> 00:11:23.605
and it's not bad for the founder.
206
00:11:23.985 --> 00:11:25.285
Now, very recently,
207
00:11:25.645 --> 00:11:29.645
a few weeks ago there was an announcement which was made
208
00:11:29.645 --> 00:11:32.165
between Baidu and cattle.
209
00:11:32.715 --> 00:11:35.325
They announced that they were going to start producing,
210
00:11:35.855 --> 00:11:39.845
developing and producing autonomous driving systems.
211
00:11:40.825 --> 00:11:45.485
Now if you produce the a DS, if you produce the battery,
212
00:11:45.985 --> 00:11:49.965
the next step is obviously the vehicle, the car itself,
213
00:11:50.905 --> 00:11:53.325
and then what's going to be very interesting is
214
00:11:53.325 --> 00:11:56.165
that be widely moved from the battery to the car
215
00:11:56.785 --> 00:11:58.965
and probably cattle is going to do the same,
216
00:11:59.625 --> 00:12:02.565
but the day you have 38% of worldwide market share,
217
00:12:02.565 --> 00:12:05.685
you are an extremely strong situation in order
218
00:12:05.745 --> 00:12:09.125
to become dominant in this kind industry, which in China
219
00:12:09.785 --> 00:12:12.485
is extremely competitive industry.
220
00:12:12.785 --> 00:12:14.245
Now that was about this story.
221
00:12:14.255 --> 00:12:16.005
Let's have a look at the financial metrics.
222
00:12:16.435 --> 00:12:19.005
Financial metrics which return capital employed
223
00:12:19.805 --> 00:12:22.245
economic indicator, which tells you the performance
224
00:12:22.245 --> 00:12:23.685
of your business operations.
225
00:12:24.005 --> 00:12:26.405
A strong element in the financial performance
226
00:12:26.405 --> 00:12:27.725
calculation of the company.
227
00:12:28.265 --> 00:12:29.285
You remember that you
228
00:12:29.505 --> 00:12:33.005
for mulla rose return capital is return on sales,
229
00:12:33.005 --> 00:12:35.845
commercial profitability times assets, turnover,
230
00:12:36.305 --> 00:12:37.405
assets, productivity.
231
00:12:38.355 --> 00:12:41.485
What is interesting if you look at BYD is
232
00:12:41.485 --> 00:12:45.245
that the return capital today is significantly more than
233
00:12:45.245 --> 00:12:48.845
yesterday, but it is only 15%.
234
00:12:49.195 --> 00:12:50.485
What drove the evolution
235
00:12:50.485 --> 00:12:54.125
of the return capital employed in the last years is not
236
00:12:54.125 --> 00:12:56.605
that much evolution of the commercial profitability,
237
00:12:57.255 --> 00:12:59.845
which is quite low, four 5%.
238
00:13:00.585 --> 00:13:02.805
Now what drove the rose up is the evolution
239
00:13:02.805 --> 00:13:06.885
of the assets turnover, which went up dramatically
240
00:13:06.885 --> 00:13:08.245
during the last years.
241
00:13:09.225 --> 00:13:12.605
If you look at the same graph for capital, you understand
242
00:13:12.605 --> 00:13:17.405
that the return capital employed is also kind of 15%
243
00:13:18.145 --> 00:13:20.485
return on sales, not outstanding,
244
00:13:21.445 --> 00:13:23.405
a little bit growing throughout the years,
245
00:13:23.465 --> 00:13:27.845
but not dramatic economies of scale generated by volumes.
246
00:13:28.275 --> 00:13:31.645
Then the assets turnover is driving the return capital
247
00:13:32.005 --> 00:13:34.605
employee, it's a bit more volatile, of course it's up,
248
00:13:34.665 --> 00:13:38.765
but it's more volatile than BYD for which it's steadily up.
249
00:13:38.945 --> 00:13:41.205
Now if we summarize the construction of the rose,
250
00:13:41.825 --> 00:13:45.765
the return sales is constant for BYD four, five,
251
00:13:46.305 --> 00:13:51.125
all growing slowly for cattle from six to seven to 8%,
252
00:13:51.585 --> 00:13:52.685
but it's not that big.
253
00:13:53.035 --> 00:13:54.525
It's not tremendous p
254
00:13:54.525 --> 00:13:56.845
and l, it is the assets turnover,
255
00:13:56.845 --> 00:13:59.965
which is driving the return capital employed against about
256
00:13:59.965 --> 00:14:04.125
15% for both of them tripling for BY, D
257
00:14:04.125 --> 00:14:08.285
during the last years a bit variable even if it was a little
258
00:14:08.285 --> 00:14:09.845
bit of for cattle.
259
00:14:10.305 --> 00:14:12.005
Now the return on capital employee,
260
00:14:12.065 --> 00:14:16.525
and that's a very important observation, is quite moderate,
261
00:14:17.345 --> 00:14:19.845
so these companies are creating a lot of value.
262
00:14:20.225 --> 00:14:22.885
The stock price is skyrocketing, not the rose,
263
00:14:24.025 --> 00:14:27.245
and if you look at BYD as opposed to cattle, BYD,
264
00:14:27.245 --> 00:14:31.485
again it's 4.5% average times 3.2
265
00:14:31.985 --> 00:14:35.405
for cattle is 7.5% times two.
266
00:14:35.825 --> 00:14:40.525
The by the ends a day you get to 15%, you take the taxes out
267
00:14:40.525 --> 00:14:42.805
of that and you deduct the cost of capital.
268
00:14:43.065 --> 00:14:45.525
The financial performance is not fantastic,
269
00:14:45.945 --> 00:14:48.245
but the market likes these two companies.
270
00:14:48.545 --> 00:14:51.405
If you confront the return capital market to book,
271
00:14:51.405 --> 00:14:53.885
which are Jira speaking, quite correlated
272
00:14:53.985 --> 00:14:57.685
for companies which get to a certain level of maturity,
273
00:14:57.935 --> 00:14:59.245
there is a correlation here.
274
00:14:59.265 --> 00:15:02.005
The correlation is not that obvious.
275
00:15:02.015 --> 00:15:04.485
There is a kind of correlation and momentum,
276
00:15:04.665 --> 00:15:06.605
but what is very interesting if that
277
00:15:06.605 --> 00:15:08.525
for a company like biwa E,
278
00:15:08.905 --> 00:15:11.925
the rose is only 15 per cm
279
00:15:12.105 --> 00:15:14.125
and the market to book is three
280
00:15:14.545 --> 00:15:17.405
or it went up to four and five.
281
00:15:17.775 --> 00:15:22.445
Today it's three, but three is quite a lot when you compare
282
00:15:22.675 --> 00:15:25.285
with the rose, which again should be calculated
283
00:15:25.285 --> 00:15:26.805
after tax minus the wh.
284
00:15:27.385 --> 00:15:29.885
So at the end of the day there is some potential
285
00:15:29.945 --> 00:15:31.125
for growth in the market
286
00:15:31.185 --> 00:15:34.165
to book even though it was declining the last two years.
287
00:15:34.595 --> 00:15:35.885
Same story for cattle.
288
00:15:36.345 --> 00:15:38.045
The correlation is not that obvious
289
00:15:38.075 --> 00:15:40.445
between the return capital and the market to book,
290
00:15:40.445 --> 00:15:41.805
but this company is quite young
291
00:15:42.025 --> 00:15:44.525
and it's not yet quite stabilized.
292
00:15:45.065 --> 00:15:50.005
Not 15% is the rose and the market to book is four.
293
00:15:50.465 --> 00:15:53.725
So you understand that there is some credibility in terms
294
00:15:53.725 --> 00:15:55.485
of value creation as far
295
00:15:55.485 --> 00:15:57.725
as investors' opinions are concerned.
296
00:15:57.875 --> 00:16:00.965
It's interesting to make a benchmark between B, y, D
297
00:16:00.965 --> 00:16:02.485
and cattle as far as credibility
298
00:16:02.505 --> 00:16:04.245
and performance are concerned.
299
00:16:04.895 --> 00:16:08.445
Again, the rose is quite the same for both companies market
300
00:16:08.545 --> 00:16:12.645
to book more than four, four cattle, three, four, BYD.
301
00:16:13.465 --> 00:16:16.605
But what is interesting is to look at the gearing
302
00:16:16.605 --> 00:16:19.285
because when you calculate the work it's weighted average
303
00:16:19.355 --> 00:16:22.485
cost of capillary is the cost of equity and cost of debt.
304
00:16:22.585 --> 00:16:25.125
Pro ratta a respective investment made
305
00:16:25.125 --> 00:16:26.685
by shareholders on one side
306
00:16:26.685 --> 00:16:28.605
and financial operators on the other side.
307
00:16:28.945 --> 00:16:32.445
No financial debt is absolutely marginal,
308
00:16:33.005 --> 00:16:34.965
a little bit positive for BYD,
309
00:16:35.405 --> 00:16:36.965
a little bit negative for cattle.
310
00:16:37.465 --> 00:16:39.885
So the work is in fact the cost of equity.
311
00:16:40.225 --> 00:16:43.725
The cost of equity is a long term government bond rate plus
312
00:16:44.185 --> 00:16:46.885
the market risk premium multiplied by the beta.
313
00:16:47.415 --> 00:16:49.525
These companies are predominantly Chinese
314
00:16:50.105 --> 00:16:51.725
so the government bond rate is the same
315
00:16:51.725 --> 00:16:53.285
and the market risk premium is the same.
316
00:16:53.355 --> 00:16:55.125
What makes a difference is the beta,
317
00:16:55.465 --> 00:16:57.565
and you remember I said
318
00:16:57.565 --> 00:17:00.765
that there was some resilience when the Hong saying went
319
00:17:00.765 --> 00:17:04.605
down, BYD was more resilient than cattle.
320
00:17:05.385 --> 00:17:09.045
The consequences of beta, the beta is 0.64 BY, D
321
00:17:09.185 --> 00:17:10.885
and it is about one for cattle,
322
00:17:11.585 --> 00:17:14.725
but interestingly as the beta is higher for cattle,
323
00:17:15.265 --> 00:17:18.525
the W is higher because the W again is a cost of equity.
324
00:17:19.545 --> 00:17:23.285
Now you understand that it generates the same rose, the wack
325
00:17:23.345 --> 00:17:25.925
of cattle is a little bit higher, which mean
326
00:17:25.925 --> 00:17:29.725
that the economic profit generated by cattle is less
327
00:17:29.745 --> 00:17:32.685
and the economic profit generated by BYD
328
00:17:33.145 --> 00:17:34.885
and the market to book is higher.
329
00:17:35.995 --> 00:17:38.045
What conclusion do you take from that?
330
00:17:38.505 --> 00:17:40.325
You take a very simple conclusion.
331
00:17:40.785 --> 00:17:41.965
If the economic profit
332
00:17:42.105 --> 00:17:45.445
of cattle is less than the economic profit of BYD,
333
00:17:45.445 --> 00:17:47.685
because again it is the same thing,
334
00:17:47.945 --> 00:17:51.165
but as the beta of cattle is greater than the beta of BYD,
335
00:17:51.165 --> 00:17:54.005
the wack of cattle is greater than the wack of BYD.
336
00:17:54.545 --> 00:17:56.165
But if the market to book
337
00:17:56.165 --> 00:17:59.485
of cattle is higher than the market to book for BYD,
338
00:17:59.485 --> 00:18:02.845
it means that the gross prospect are significantly higher
339
00:18:03.185 --> 00:18:06.405
for cattle than BYD, which is quite interesting
340
00:18:06.405 --> 00:18:09.365
because if you look at the recent evolution of sales
341
00:18:10.045 --> 00:18:11.605
B white, it was skyrocketing
342
00:18:11.625 --> 00:18:14.285
and cattle was a little bit plateauing,
343
00:18:15.065 --> 00:18:19.045
but it's not in the announcements about investment factories
344
00:18:19.185 --> 00:18:21.005
and so on, which I'm going to develop.
345
00:18:21.135 --> 00:18:22.325
Let's go back a minute
346
00:18:22.325 --> 00:18:24.285
to the financial structure of the company.
347
00:18:24.745 --> 00:18:28.005
The financial structure is assessed by two indicators.
348
00:18:28.455 --> 00:18:32.085
First debt as opposed to equity in book terms,
349
00:18:32.265 --> 00:18:35.445
so debt divided by equity, which you read in the bouncy
350
00:18:35.865 --> 00:18:38.005
or in market terms, which is debt divided
351
00:18:38.105 --> 00:18:39.685
by the market capitalization.
352
00:18:39.715 --> 00:18:40.965
This is a financial structure
353
00:18:41.545 --> 00:18:42.965
and the ability of the company
354
00:18:42.985 --> 00:18:45.725
to repay its debt is named the leverage is debt
355
00:18:45.725 --> 00:18:47.165
divided by EBD.
356
00:18:47.945 --> 00:18:50.605
If you look at both indicators for BYD, you understand
357
00:18:50.605 --> 00:18:54.645
that the company had quite a high leverage in 2000
358
00:18:54.645 --> 00:18:56.685
12, 14, 15, et cetera,
359
00:18:57.065 --> 00:18:59.765
and then the gearing dramatically went down.
360
00:19:00.145 --> 00:19:02.125
The leverage dramatically went down
361
00:19:02.425 --> 00:19:06.045
and you understand that today the company's indebtedness is
362
00:19:06.235 --> 00:19:10.925
extremely negligible as far as capital is concerned.
363
00:19:10.945 --> 00:19:13.565
The financial structure was a little bit more stable.
364
00:19:14.345 --> 00:19:18.005
On the graph you see some variability in the leverage.
365
00:19:18.005 --> 00:19:21.445
It's because it's due to a B, D, A on one side
366
00:19:21.545 --> 00:19:24.045
and debt, which is a bit negative, a bit positive,
367
00:19:24.385 --> 00:19:26.045
so this is why there's some variability,
368
00:19:26.225 --> 00:19:28.085
but you understand that the financial structure
369
00:19:28.085 --> 00:19:31.365
of the financial strategy of capital was no debt
370
00:19:32.025 --> 00:19:35.125
and today the gearing is a little bit negative.
371
00:19:35.795 --> 00:19:39.165
This is why net debt divided by a bid D is negative.
372
00:19:39.195 --> 00:19:41.965
It's not because EBD is negative, it is
373
00:19:41.965 --> 00:19:43.285
because debt is negative.
374
00:19:43.465 --> 00:19:46.405
So you understand that these two companies have another
375
00:19:46.405 --> 00:19:51.165
feature in common, very conservative financial strategies.
376
00:19:51.785 --> 00:19:54.365
Now when you have almost no debt in the balance sheet
377
00:19:54.385 --> 00:19:57.285
or a little bit negative gearing, your flexibility
378
00:19:57.825 --> 00:20:01.245
is at its maximum level and that's great
379
00:20:01.475 --> 00:20:04.645
because when you have some flexibility in your balance
380
00:20:04.645 --> 00:20:07.925
sheet, you have the ability to grasp opportunities
381
00:20:08.345 --> 00:20:10.085
and exercise growth options.
382
00:20:10.745 --> 00:20:12.205
Growth is about investment.
383
00:20:12.625 --> 00:20:15.805
The companies want to grow, they need to invest
384
00:20:16.105 --> 00:20:17.925
and the need is kind of flexibility
385
00:20:18.305 --> 00:20:21.525
so it's perfectly consistent in terms of business as opposed
386
00:20:21.525 --> 00:20:22.645
to financial strategy.
387
00:20:23.215 --> 00:20:26.725
Let's deep dive a little bit into the CapEx strategies
388
00:20:26.725 --> 00:20:27.725
of these two companies.
389
00:20:28.465 --> 00:20:31.445
In order to assess the CapEx strategy of a company,
390
00:20:31.935 --> 00:20:33.005
there are two indicators.
391
00:20:33.465 --> 00:20:36.285
One is CapEx as a percentage to revenues,
392
00:20:36.975 --> 00:20:38.885
which is about which percentage
393
00:20:38.885 --> 00:20:40.485
of your revenues you invest each
394
00:20:40.485 --> 00:20:42.925
and every year in developing the company.
395
00:20:43.425 --> 00:20:45.845
And the other one is about intensity.
396
00:20:46.675 --> 00:20:48.845
It's CapEx divided by depreciation.
397
00:20:48.845 --> 00:20:52.125
Depreciation is a memory of the investment you made
398
00:20:52.125 --> 00:20:55.405
during the last years and CapEx is a CapEx of the year,
399
00:20:55.425 --> 00:20:58.205
so you confirm the CapEx of the year with a CapEx
400
00:20:58.205 --> 00:21:00.845
of yesterday and when you are CapEx divided
401
00:21:00.865 --> 00:21:02.565
by depreciation is more than one
402
00:21:02.745 --> 00:21:04.805
and significantly more than one.
403
00:21:05.185 --> 00:21:09.285
It means that you are investing in capacity companies
404
00:21:09.425 --> 00:21:11.405
for which a ratio is about one.
405
00:21:11.555 --> 00:21:14.285
They are maturity, CapEx, depreciation,
406
00:21:14.545 --> 00:21:18.205
no increase in capacity, just productivity and maintenance.
407
00:21:18.205 --> 00:21:21.365
When the company's CapEx over depreciation is less than one,
408
00:21:21.865 --> 00:21:23.605
it means that the companies maybe
409
00:21:24.235 --> 00:21:27.245
only maintaining its manufacturing facilities
410
00:21:27.545 --> 00:21:30.885
and maybe outsourcing, but when it's greater than one it's
411
00:21:30.885 --> 00:21:32.365
about capacity and
412
00:21:32.365 --> 00:21:36.005
of course BY is extremely dynamic investing in production
413
00:21:36.005 --> 00:21:37.845
just to be able to serve the customers.
414
00:21:38.425 --> 00:21:41.565
Of course there is a period where CapEx is less,
415
00:21:41.675 --> 00:21:42.925
it's in 2020.
416
00:21:43.675 --> 00:21:44.685
This is about covid,
417
00:21:45.145 --> 00:21:47.485
but that's an accident that's an exception.
418
00:21:47.625 --> 00:21:50.045
The company is investing dramatically
419
00:21:51.545 --> 00:21:53.005
cattle, same story.
420
00:21:53.425 --> 00:21:56.605
The investment is a very high percentage to sales
421
00:21:56.625 --> 00:21:59.485
and revenues except during these two years,
422
00:21:59.705 --> 00:22:02.165
but we have observed that the company's volume
423
00:22:02.585 --> 00:22:04.845
and revenues are a little bit stabilizing.
424
00:22:05.545 --> 00:22:08.165
In the meantime, there is plenty of announcement
425
00:22:08.385 --> 00:22:11.845
for new factories in Spain, in Michigan,
426
00:22:12.265 --> 00:22:14.045
in Hungary and so on and so forth.
427
00:22:14.265 --> 00:22:16.485
It means that today is a kind of accident
428
00:22:16.665 --> 00:22:19.325
or temporarily we are down,
429
00:22:19.585 --> 00:22:21.805
but tomorrow it's going to be up again.
430
00:22:21.985 --> 00:22:24.965
To summarize the investment strategies of these companies,
431
00:22:25.475 --> 00:22:28.165
very high CapEx to revenue ratios
432
00:22:28.625 --> 00:22:31.045
and very high CapEx depreciation
433
00:22:31.545 --> 00:22:33.725
by far CapEx exceed depreciation.
434
00:22:33.825 --> 00:22:38.285
Though the companies are investing in production capacity
435
00:22:38.585 --> 00:22:39.925
and it's consistent with the fact
436
00:22:39.925 --> 00:22:41.365
that their revenues are growing.
437
00:22:42.215 --> 00:22:46.725
Maybe not today but tomorrow. Today is BYD.
438
00:22:47.165 --> 00:22:49.845
Tomorrow it's cattle. Plenty of announcements.
439
00:22:50.105 --> 00:22:53.525
We are going to build new plants to produce.
440
00:22:53.905 --> 00:22:55.845
The problem with growth is
441
00:22:55.845 --> 00:22:59.045
that it creates value if you are performing
442
00:22:59.105 --> 00:23:00.525
so if your rose is greater
443
00:23:00.625 --> 00:23:02.205
and your weight leverage cost of capital,
444
00:23:02.345 --> 00:23:06.405
but in any case, growth is consuming financial resources
445
00:23:06.625 --> 00:23:09.445
so you need to find the resources in order
446
00:23:09.505 --> 00:23:11.125
to fuel the growth of the company.
447
00:23:11.345 --> 00:23:14.725
The first resource which you can mobilize is the profit you
448
00:23:14.925 --> 00:23:16.485
generate in business operations
449
00:23:17.265 --> 00:23:19.125
and this is the one we prefer.
450
00:23:19.145 --> 00:23:21.445
We finance people. If you are performing today
451
00:23:21.445 --> 00:23:24.205
and generating nice profits today as a consequence
452
00:23:24.205 --> 00:23:27.245
of good investments you made yesterday, then you have plenty
453
00:23:27.385 --> 00:23:29.565
of money in your pocket today in order
454
00:23:29.585 --> 00:23:32.605
to finance the evolution of your capacity.
455
00:23:34.875 --> 00:23:36.215
But when you look at the p
456
00:23:36.215 --> 00:23:40.135
and l, you remember the return on sales is not skyrocketing
457
00:23:40.635 --> 00:23:43.055
and the return on sales is not outstanding.
458
00:23:43.835 --> 00:23:46.205
If you look at the evolution of of the operating expenses
459
00:23:46.745 --> 00:23:48.885
of BYD, what do you observe?
460
00:23:49.395 --> 00:23:53.845
Cost of sales, cost of goods sold 80 to 90%,
461
00:23:54.785 --> 00:23:57.445
not much in terms of economies of scale
462
00:23:58.005 --> 00:23:59.285
a little bit this last years,
463
00:23:59.345 --> 00:24:01.325
but it does not seem to be outstanding.
464
00:24:02.135 --> 00:24:05.965
There are some economies of scale in the indirect costs, s,
465
00:24:06.205 --> 00:24:08.965
g and a sales general and admin expenses
466
00:24:09.705 --> 00:24:14.365
and this went down by 1.5%, quite stable in terms
467
00:24:14.425 --> 00:24:17.005
of cost of sales and what about r and d?
468
00:24:17.225 --> 00:24:20.445
The company's massively investing in research development
469
00:24:20.545 --> 00:24:23.045
and innovation and as a consequence
470
00:24:23.625 --> 00:24:26.365
the figure went up not only in absolute terms
471
00:24:26.465 --> 00:24:28.005
but relative to revenues.
472
00:24:28.205 --> 00:24:32.205
R and d went up from 2.5% to 6% of revenue.
473
00:24:33.235 --> 00:24:36.645
This is why maybe the company is generating some economies
474
00:24:36.645 --> 00:24:37.805
scale for indirect cost.
475
00:24:37.805 --> 00:24:40.885
Maybe the cost of sales is a bit down when you know
476
00:24:40.885 --> 00:24:43.685
what you invest not only in tangible assets
477
00:24:43.945 --> 00:24:45.205
but also in innovation.
478
00:24:45.875 --> 00:24:47.045
Intangibles, r
479
00:24:47.045 --> 00:24:49.605
and d for cattle it's a little bit different story.
480
00:24:50.265 --> 00:24:53.285
The SGNA figure went dramatically up.
481
00:24:53.315 --> 00:24:57.085
They saved about 4.5%. What about the cost of sales?
482
00:24:57.145 --> 00:25:00.005
It went up dramatically at the very beginning
483
00:25:00.005 --> 00:25:04.805
of the story in 2019 to 2020 then there is a kind
484
00:25:04.805 --> 00:25:08.885
of stabilization and today some economies of scale r
485
00:25:08.885 --> 00:25:11.605
and d constant about 5%
486
00:25:11.665 --> 00:25:14.365
of revenues waste fluctuations obviously,
487
00:25:14.425 --> 00:25:16.765
but there is no specific trend.
488
00:25:16.985 --> 00:25:20.045
The companies investing a lot, plenty of patterns.
489
00:25:20.045 --> 00:25:23.125
You remember number eight in the world in 2023
490
00:25:23.465 --> 00:25:25.645
and the company is keeping on investing
491
00:25:25.645 --> 00:25:26.725
in research and development.
492
00:25:26.785 --> 00:25:28.125
Now you understand that the commercial
493
00:25:28.125 --> 00:25:29.885
profitability is not outstanding.
494
00:25:30.705 --> 00:25:33.085
If you want to finance your capital expenditures,
495
00:25:33.665 --> 00:25:36.405
you are going to calculate the free cash flow in which the
496
00:25:36.605 --> 00:25:38.045
resource is EBDA.
497
00:25:38.635 --> 00:25:41.965
What we discussed so far is the EBIT return on sales is EBIT
498
00:25:41.965 --> 00:25:43.205
divided by revenues.
499
00:25:43.745 --> 00:25:46.885
EBITDA A is EBIT before you deduct the precision
500
00:25:46.885 --> 00:25:50.405
and amortization the consequence of your past investment.
501
00:25:50.785 --> 00:25:54.285
The cash operating profit, which is EBDA, went down
502
00:25:54.545 --> 00:25:58.005
for cattle for a number of reasons, including the fact
503
00:25:58.005 --> 00:26:01.205
that the cost of sales was up and now he's stabilizing.
504
00:26:01.955 --> 00:26:03.285
What about BYD?
505
00:26:03.655 --> 00:26:04.725
Relatively stable,
506
00:26:05.145 --> 00:26:07.845
but it does not seem that these companies are privileging
507
00:26:08.055 --> 00:26:09.685
their p and l in the short run.
508
00:26:10.145 --> 00:26:13.765
The return on sales are quite stable or a little bit up,
509
00:26:14.185 --> 00:26:15.885
but it's absolutely not outstanding.
510
00:26:16.665 --> 00:26:19.765
The problem is that with your EBIT deal you have to be able
511
00:26:19.765 --> 00:26:21.845
to finance your working capital requirement
512
00:26:22.185 --> 00:26:23.645
and your capital expenditures.
513
00:26:25.765 --> 00:26:28.035
Let's have a look at the evolutionary working capital
514
00:26:28.035 --> 00:26:29.395
requirement, which is a consequence
515
00:26:29.395 --> 00:26:31.115
of managing your operating cycle.
516
00:26:31.855 --> 00:26:34.395
You remember that inventories plus receivables minus
517
00:26:34.515 --> 00:26:37.235
payables, it's a monnet which is stock in the operating
518
00:26:37.235 --> 00:26:39.595
cycle and we finance people we like very much.
519
00:26:39.595 --> 00:26:42.075
When you can reduce a working capital requirement
520
00:26:42.345 --> 00:26:45.325
because it's money which is no more in the operating cycle
521
00:26:45.425 --> 00:26:49.445
but invested in value generating non current asset
522
00:26:49.445 --> 00:26:52.125
investment factories, brands whatsoever.
523
00:26:52.465 --> 00:26:55.485
If you look at BYD, you understand that there was a very
524
00:26:56.165 --> 00:26:57.925
negative and then positive evolution
525
00:26:57.925 --> 00:26:59.405
of the cash conversion cycle.
526
00:27:00.185 --> 00:27:04.245
It was quite high up to 150 days of revenues.
527
00:27:05.095 --> 00:27:07.125
Today it's a bit less. Why?
528
00:27:07.125 --> 00:27:09.005
Because the company started managing
529
00:27:09.065 --> 00:27:10.085
its accounts receivable.
530
00:27:10.085 --> 00:27:11.565
It's nice to sell to your customers
531
00:27:11.585 --> 00:27:14.565
but it's even better to collect the money from them and
532
00:27:14.565 --> 00:27:18.245
because also the accounts payable dramatically went up
533
00:27:18.825 --> 00:27:21.885
it now 150 days, so
534
00:27:22.485 --> 00:27:24.885
suppliers were a little bit mobilized in order
535
00:27:24.985 --> 00:27:27.205
to reduce a working capital requirement.
536
00:27:27.695 --> 00:27:29.485
Today the cash conversion cycle
537
00:27:30.225 --> 00:27:32.725
is quite stabilized at the level which
538
00:27:32.725 --> 00:27:34.005
is a little bit negative.
539
00:27:34.625 --> 00:27:36.645
No problem, no more problem,
540
00:27:37.585 --> 00:27:40.925
but the working capital requirement is at breakeven.
541
00:27:41.205 --> 00:27:44.965
I would say same conclusion, not exactly the same process
542
00:27:45.145 --> 00:27:46.645
and dynamics for cattle,
543
00:27:47.265 --> 00:27:49.245
but what they have in common is the fact
544
00:27:49.245 --> 00:27:51.485
that the accounts payable went up,
545
00:27:51.975 --> 00:27:54.205
which is not very nice for the suppliers.
546
00:27:54.595 --> 00:27:58.085
Inventories went up and down and accounts receiv went down
547
00:27:58.085 --> 00:27:59.845
and it's quite stable for cattle,
548
00:28:00.545 --> 00:28:03.885
but again, the cash conversion cycle is a little bit
549
00:28:04.245 --> 00:28:07.485
negative stabilized, so it's no more problem
550
00:28:08.385 --> 00:28:11.405
and then the working capital requirement is quite stable,
551
00:28:11.825 --> 00:28:14.365
not consuming, not generating cash.
552
00:28:14.475 --> 00:28:17.685
Therefore both companies a working capital requirement is
553
00:28:17.685 --> 00:28:20.925
not a problem, it's not anymore a problem
554
00:28:21.825 --> 00:28:24.405
and we have to thank very much the nice
555
00:28:24.705 --> 00:28:28.485
and certainly happy contribution of the suppliers in terms
556
00:28:28.485 --> 00:28:32.965
of increase in the accounts payable just to wrap up on CapEx
557
00:28:33.025 --> 00:28:35.445
to revenues for BYD and cattle,
558
00:28:35.625 --> 00:28:38.485
but then on the same slide you understand that as far
559
00:28:38.485 --> 00:28:43.405
as BYD is concerned, CapEx is about 15% of revenues,
560
00:28:43.405 --> 00:28:45.445
which is quite high cattle.
561
00:28:45.545 --> 00:28:49.725
In the past it was a bit more than 25% it went down.
562
00:28:50.055 --> 00:28:53.605
It'll certainly go up the JU up to open the factories,
563
00:28:53.815 --> 00:28:56.925
which you announced $14 billion.
564
00:28:57.545 --> 00:29:00.805
Now the working capital requirement is close to zero,
565
00:29:01.345 --> 00:29:04.565
so the question is does EBDA fine on
566
00:29:04.565 --> 00:29:05.685
the capital expenditures?
567
00:29:06.105 --> 00:29:08.245
You simply divide EBDA by CapEx.
568
00:29:08.245 --> 00:29:11.125
If it's more than one, it means that e BDA is large enough
569
00:29:11.125 --> 00:29:14.285
so that your free cash flow is positive in the long term.
570
00:29:14.945 --> 00:29:16.885
So we compare the ratio with one
571
00:29:16.905 --> 00:29:20.165
and we understand that with very few exceptions,
572
00:29:20.825 --> 00:29:22.965
the ratio is less than one,
573
00:29:23.185 --> 00:29:26.325
so the PDA does not fine on the capital expenditures.
574
00:29:26.325 --> 00:29:27.765
Of course, when you stop CapEx
575
00:29:27.765 --> 00:29:31.445
because of covid, the A BDA is financing the CapEx
576
00:29:31.445 --> 00:29:34.725
because there's no CapEx anymore or something like that.
577
00:29:35.225 --> 00:29:39.125
Now in the last years the ratio is a little bit up.
578
00:29:39.355 --> 00:29:41.605
It's strictly greater than one for cattle.
579
00:29:42.115 --> 00:29:44.885
It's about one in 2024 for BYD,
580
00:29:45.145 --> 00:29:47.005
but you understand that at the end
581
00:29:47.005 --> 00:29:50.525
of the day the company's profitability is not very high,
582
00:29:51.185 --> 00:29:53.405
but the CapEx figure is very high
583
00:29:54.185 --> 00:29:56.605
and so you will need some extra additional
584
00:29:56.635 --> 00:29:57.845
financial resources.
585
00:29:58.245 --> 00:30:01.605
EBDA does not finance the industrial
586
00:30:01.655 --> 00:30:03.525
investment in the long term.
587
00:30:03.785 --> 00:30:05.525
Now, how do you finance your investment?
588
00:30:06.025 --> 00:30:08.605
You need external resources.
589
00:30:08.795 --> 00:30:12.525
When the internal resources are not smart enough
590
00:30:12.525 --> 00:30:16.485
to finance CapEx and Rev, you can ask the government
591
00:30:17.185 --> 00:30:18.485
and then there is an aid,
592
00:30:18.645 --> 00:30:21.285
a financial aid which comes from the state.
593
00:30:21.865 --> 00:30:24.605
We all know that it's about subsidies,
594
00:30:24.755 --> 00:30:28.365
it's about regulations, it's about infrastructure in order
595
00:30:28.385 --> 00:30:30.245
to support the development of your sales.
596
00:30:30.555 --> 00:30:33.525
It's about bringing some innovation, cash to finance,
597
00:30:33.525 --> 00:30:36.565
innovation, tax reductions and so on and so forth.
598
00:30:37.225 --> 00:30:40.005
Of course, a Chinese government supported the car
599
00:30:40.405 --> 00:30:41.725
industry quite a lot.
600
00:30:42.555 --> 00:30:45.685
It's obviously extremely difficult to give a figure,
601
00:30:45.695 --> 00:30:47.685
which is certainly the right figure.
602
00:30:47.935 --> 00:30:51.765
There are some estimates about $230 billion,
603
00:30:52.255 --> 00:30:55.605
which is quite a lot and it's quite interesting
604
00:30:55.605 --> 00:30:58.005
because on the one hand the Chinese government is
605
00:30:58.005 --> 00:30:59.085
supporting the industry.
606
00:30:59.545 --> 00:31:02.765
On the other hand, there is a fierce competition in China
607
00:31:03.345 --> 00:31:05.765
to try to identify who the winner is going
608
00:31:05.765 --> 00:31:06.845
to be in the future,
609
00:31:07.385 --> 00:31:10.045
but what is extremely interesting as far
610
00:31:10.045 --> 00:31:11.365
as BYD is concerned,
611
00:31:11.605 --> 00:31:15.485
BYD was a little bit in difficulties in 2017
612
00:31:15.545 --> 00:31:16.845
to 2019.
613
00:31:17.185 --> 00:31:20.365
The CEO said it were terrible euros for us
614
00:31:20.745 --> 00:31:23.125
and at that time the Chinese government
615
00:31:23.525 --> 00:31:24.605
provided some support.
616
00:31:25.435 --> 00:31:27.285
Your company, which is quite interesting
617
00:31:27.285 --> 00:31:29.005
for the country, you are in trouble.
618
00:31:29.615 --> 00:31:32.725
We're going to give you some oxygen so that
619
00:31:32.725 --> 00:31:36.605
during these difficult times you can recover a little bit
620
00:31:36.785 --> 00:31:38.045
and that's quite interesting
621
00:31:38.045 --> 00:31:41.725
because it significantly reduces the risk of the company.
622
00:31:42.505 --> 00:31:45.885
You can take a risk when you know that if you have taken
623
00:31:45.945 --> 00:31:48.965
and selected the right investment, you know that if
624
00:31:49.185 --> 00:31:52.805
by accident there are some difficult times, you are going
625
00:31:52.805 --> 00:31:56.405
to be supported by those people who are mutualizing.
626
00:31:56.545 --> 00:31:59.445
The risk at the country level, which is named the state,
627
00:32:00.265 --> 00:32:03.365
that's quite interesting in terms of industrial policy,
628
00:32:04.315 --> 00:32:07.045
it's just giving money when needed
629
00:32:07.275 --> 00:32:10.125
because there is an accident and you have to go through.
630
00:32:10.465 --> 00:32:13.805
Now we are closer to the conclusion you want to grow,
631
00:32:14.145 --> 00:32:18.205
you need financial resources, your profitability is modest,
632
00:32:18.555 --> 00:32:22.445
your rose is 15, it's certainly not enough
633
00:32:23.065 --> 00:32:24.925
and you have plenty of industrial ambitious.
634
00:32:25.265 --> 00:32:28.805
In the meantime, you keep a conservative financial policy.
635
00:32:29.315 --> 00:32:31.445
Know that in the balance sheet, so who is going
636
00:32:31.445 --> 00:32:32.445
to finance your growth?
637
00:32:32.825 --> 00:32:36.005
Not the bankers, but if it's not the bankers
638
00:32:36.465 --> 00:32:40.525
and if it's not your profitability inside, then
639
00:32:41.115 --> 00:32:42.525
it's about the shareholders.
640
00:32:43.265 --> 00:32:44.485
The dividend which is paid
641
00:32:44.485 --> 00:32:47.725
by both companies is a little bit positive but not that big.
642
00:32:47.785 --> 00:32:50.245
Of course, you're not going to waste your earnings
643
00:32:50.835 --> 00:32:52.365
returning the cash to shareholders,
644
00:32:52.465 --> 00:32:53.525
but then what's going to happen?
645
00:32:53.825 --> 00:32:54.885
You need your shareholders
646
00:32:55.425 --> 00:32:58.365
and then you need to have access to the equity market.
647
00:32:58.835 --> 00:33:03.445
This concept is named sustainable growth if you want to grow
648
00:33:04.025 --> 00:33:06.765
and if your profitability inside is not enough,
649
00:33:07.195 --> 00:33:09.205
it's bankers and it's a shareholders.
650
00:33:09.465 --> 00:33:12.285
If the bankers are out of the pictures, it's a shareholders.
651
00:33:12.335 --> 00:33:13.485
Let's go back to equity,
652
00:33:14.815 --> 00:33:18.095
B-Y-D-I-P-O In 2002 funds raised
653
00:33:18.755 --> 00:33:23.735
180 million Samsung in the battery business understanding
654
00:33:23.735 --> 00:33:27.935
that there was something big happening at BYD 2016.
655
00:33:28.245 --> 00:33:33.175
Samsung is injecting $450 million 2021
656
00:33:33.765 --> 00:33:37.575
open market equity issue, 1.8 billion
657
00:33:38.315 --> 00:33:42.175
2024, quasi equity perpetual bonds.
658
00:33:42.235 --> 00:33:43.455
So you issue the bonds
659
00:33:43.515 --> 00:33:46.175
and there is no termination date for that.
660
00:33:46.635 --> 00:33:50.935
$2 billion 20, 25. Hey folks, we need money.
661
00:33:51.605 --> 00:33:53.815
$5.6 billion
662
00:33:53.995 --> 00:33:56.975
and it's absolutely mechanical cattle.
663
00:33:57.555 --> 00:33:59.895
Recent IPO 2018,
664
00:34:00.155 --> 00:34:04.175
you remember the figure 760 million raised from capital
665
00:34:04.235 --> 00:34:07.655
market, a very big contribution
666
00:34:07.655 --> 00:34:12.055
of Hill House U-B-S-G-P, Morgan Honda car business,
667
00:34:12.795 --> 00:34:15.695
2.8 billion in 2020
668
00:34:16.355 --> 00:34:19.295
for premo valuation of 50 billion.
669
00:34:20.515 --> 00:34:23.695
Now the company is listed in the SHE stock market.
670
00:34:23.955 --> 00:34:26.895
It is very restricted in terms of investors portfolio.
671
00:34:27.195 --> 00:34:28.735
You have to broaden the scope
672
00:34:29.435 --> 00:34:32.935
and then it's no more a shares in Shanghai or in Xang.
673
00:34:32.935 --> 00:34:36.735
Zhen. It is H shares on the Hong Kong stock exchange
674
00:34:37.155 --> 00:34:38.975
and cattle announced that they are going
675
00:34:38.975 --> 00:34:40.615
to make a dual listing.
676
00:34:41.245 --> 00:34:45.975
Xang Zhen Hong Kong 2025 amount. Difficult to assess.
677
00:34:46.635 --> 00:34:48.615
The minimum as it is communicated
678
00:34:48.675 --> 00:34:50.695
by the company is 5 billion,
679
00:34:51.515 --> 00:34:54.855
but in the prospectus there are some comments which uh,
680
00:34:54.865 --> 00:34:57.815
might drive the equity issue up
681
00:34:57.815 --> 00:34:59.895
to $8 billion.
682
00:35:00.515 --> 00:35:01.655
You simply need that
683
00:35:01.655 --> 00:35:03.695
because you have to finance your growth, you have
684
00:35:03.695 --> 00:35:06.175
to finance your factories, your plans.
685
00:35:06.835 --> 00:35:10.495
Why are these capitals investing for the leadership?
686
00:35:11.195 --> 00:35:13.775
You remember the famous statement, Jeff Bezos,
687
00:35:14.115 --> 00:35:17.335
we will continue to make investment decisions in order
688
00:35:17.435 --> 00:35:19.935
to reach the long term market leadership,
689
00:35:20.335 --> 00:35:23.215
whatever the profit in the short run, whatever the opinion
690
00:35:23.235 --> 00:35:25.055
of Wall Street he added.
691
00:35:25.635 --> 00:35:27.935
So you want to invest because you are a leader.
692
00:35:28.155 --> 00:35:30.335
You want to be a leader in the long term,
693
00:35:31.035 --> 00:35:32.415
but if you invest, you're growing
694
00:35:32.915 --> 00:35:35.535
and if you're growing, you're consuming financial resources.
695
00:35:36.235 --> 00:35:37.685
Are you going to grow in China?
696
00:35:38.925 --> 00:35:40.445
Probably because the market is up,
697
00:35:40.945 --> 00:35:43.805
but that is also very much in their mind is the
698
00:35:43.805 --> 00:35:45.765
development overseas.
699
00:35:45.945 --> 00:35:49.085
And what is nice with overseas is that the prices
700
00:35:49.305 --> 00:35:51.445
for the vehicles are not exactly the same.
701
00:35:52.505 --> 00:35:53.805
On the picture here,
702
00:35:54.185 --> 00:35:57.365
you see two cars which are quite the same.
703
00:35:58.585 --> 00:36:02.045
It is the BYD ATO three.
704
00:36:02.735 --> 00:36:04.245
There is another name in China.
705
00:36:05.145 --> 00:36:06.965
Of course there are a little bit of differences
706
00:36:06.965 --> 00:36:09.765
because the regulations and constraints are a bit different.
707
00:36:09.985 --> 00:36:12.525
In China, the car is sold at the price,
708
00:36:12.525 --> 00:36:14.805
which is 17,000 US dollars.
709
00:36:15.505 --> 00:36:19.485
In Western Europe it is 47,000 US dollars.
710
00:36:19.505 --> 00:36:22.245
So you understand that behind the investment,
711
00:36:22.985 --> 00:36:25.485
of course the opex and the cost of sales are not going
712
00:36:25.485 --> 00:36:27.485
to be quite the same, but you have
713
00:36:27.505 --> 00:36:28.725
in mind this kind of profit.
714
00:36:29.185 --> 00:36:31.965
But in order to generate a profit tomorrow you have
715
00:36:31.965 --> 00:36:33.045
to invest today.
716
00:36:33.345 --> 00:36:34.645
If you want to invest today,
717
00:36:34.825 --> 00:36:36.405
you need the financial resources.
718
00:36:37.505 --> 00:36:41.525
The alternative could be debt. Oh, that is very risky.
719
00:36:42.635 --> 00:36:45.085
Then you select to go for shareholders equity.
720
00:36:45.145 --> 00:36:47.325
Ah, yes, but there is a dilution problems.
721
00:36:47.325 --> 00:36:50.245
This is why sometimes some companies they want
722
00:36:50.245 --> 00:36:54.325
to avoid equity issue because they don't want to be diluted.
723
00:36:54.395 --> 00:36:55.885
They don't want to lose the power.
724
00:36:56.195 --> 00:36:58.445
It's a case of some family businesses.
725
00:36:59.105 --> 00:37:02.525
But here, if you accept dilution, that's okay.
726
00:37:02.745 --> 00:37:04.965
And then you can finance your growth with equity.
727
00:37:05.865 --> 00:37:07.885
If you don't want to be diluted
728
00:37:07.985 --> 00:37:10.205
and if you don't want to take the risk of your debt
729
00:37:10.385 --> 00:37:12.045
and you have to grow
730
00:37:12.185 --> 00:37:13.605
and consume resources,
731
00:37:14.155 --> 00:37:16.525
then you could raise your prices in order
732
00:37:16.625 --> 00:37:19.125
to improve your margins and your rose
733
00:37:19.305 --> 00:37:20.925
and then you self-finance your growth.
734
00:37:21.105 --> 00:37:25.605
And fortunately the Chinese market is extremely competitive
735
00:37:26.105 --> 00:37:30.325
and it's impossible to increase your margins locally
736
00:37:30.435 --> 00:37:32.445
because the competition is fierce.
737
00:37:33.265 --> 00:37:35.885
And so at the end of the day, you have to go overseas.
738
00:37:36.185 --> 00:37:38.085
You want to invest, you want to be a leader.
739
00:37:38.665 --> 00:37:40.525
You don't want to take the risk in your debt,
740
00:37:40.745 --> 00:37:41.925
you accept the delusion.
741
00:37:42.065 --> 00:37:44.285
It is simply mechanical
742
00:37:45.745 --> 00:37:48.325
and you understand that the day you want
743
00:37:48.325 --> 00:37:49.765
to maximize your profit.
744
00:37:50.395 --> 00:37:53.405
Sometimes it is at the expense of the clients.
745
00:37:54.025 --> 00:37:57.245
You remember there are a few fills on the platform which are
746
00:37:57.245 --> 00:37:59.525
about, oh, there's inflation on the cost.
747
00:37:59.765 --> 00:38:01.325
I increase my prices, yes,
748
00:38:01.345 --> 00:38:05.165
but if I lose my clients, if I lose my volume,
749
00:38:05.865 --> 00:38:07.605
that's probably not a good idea.
750
00:38:07.705 --> 00:38:10.045
In terms of long term market leadership.
751
00:38:10.665 --> 00:38:13.565
If you are in a period of con querying your market share,
752
00:38:13.985 --> 00:38:17.405
forget about your short term profit, it's about long term.
753
00:38:18.185 --> 00:38:19.445
Ah, you look at the long term,
754
00:38:20.025 --> 00:38:22.045
but you also have to make money in the short term
755
00:38:22.105 --> 00:38:24.165
and if you don't make enough money in the short term,
756
00:38:24.465 --> 00:38:25.565
you need to go for equity.
757
00:38:26.235 --> 00:38:28.525
It's always this kind of tension of conflict
758
00:38:28.595 --> 00:38:31.605
between short term and long term decision taken.
759
00:38:32.185 --> 00:38:34.685
No debt equity delusion, no problem.
760
00:38:35.565 --> 00:38:40.365
Billions of dollars and not only for B, y, D and cattle.
761
00:38:40.555 --> 00:38:41.885
Last year, Jerry,
762
00:38:42.485 --> 00:38:45.925
a common factor in China is announcing the IPO
763
00:38:45.925 --> 00:38:47.405
and the Hong Kong stock exchange.
764
00:38:48.145 --> 00:38:51.085
The figures which are mentioned today are about 1 billion
765
00:38:52.065 --> 00:38:54.525
OMI in the smartphone business.
766
00:38:55.235 --> 00:38:59.725
They want to raise $5.5 billion in order
767
00:38:59.825 --> 00:39:01.885
to get into the EV business.
768
00:39:01.985 --> 00:39:04.965
So you understand that it's already densely populated
769
00:39:05.505 --> 00:39:06.845
and the crowd is growing.
770
00:39:07.355 --> 00:39:09.845
This is why you need quite a lot of equity
771
00:39:10.385 --> 00:39:14.765
and getting to overseas investment is probably a great idea.
772
00:39:15.915 --> 00:39:18.975
You understand that 5 billion seems to be a figure,
773
00:39:19.735 --> 00:39:21.055
a consensus in terms
774
00:39:21.055 --> 00:39:23.975
of equity issue in the car industry in China.
775
00:39:24.805 --> 00:39:25.595
Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to this educational film, which is going to deal with one figure and two companies.
The figure is $5 billion plus and the two companies are BY, D and cattle.
What do these two companies have in common? They are first born in China.
They are mainly operating in China.
They are 100% Chinese corporations.
They both operate in the same industry, which is the automotive industry.
BYD is about batteries and cars.
Cattle is about batteries and maybe tomorrow cars as well.
It's about the electrical vehicle.
Nothing to do with the terminal.
NGM, it's about the EV and these two companies are quite recent.
They were not created decades ago, quite recently and extremely successful in terms of growth in the revenues and in terms of value creation as well for the investors.
If we look at the evolution of the revenues generated by respectively, BYD and cattle, we observed that it was slow moving up to a few years ago and it started skyrocketing.
If you look at the current BYD revenues 2024, it's more than $100 billion, so it's not a startup anymore.
It's a very big company which is fast growing.
What about cattle? Cattle is about half the size of BYD.
It started getting up recently.
It was dramatic growth and if you look at 24, there's a kind of stabilization, but we are going to discover the potential for growth for BYD and certainly for cattle.
Now what about value creation? What about the stock price? These companies were recently for cattle and a bit far ago for BYD listed on the sheen and now on the Hong Kong stock exchange.
And if you look at the original stock price, it was not that brilliant except that from 2019 to 2021, the stock price mul multiplied by five in two years, which is an outstanding performance.
Now there seems to be a kind of plateauing this last year, but the question is how does it compare with the Hong Kong stock exchange? And that's a very interesting observation.
When the stock price was flat for these two companies, it was quite flat for the Hong index and then it went up because of these companies, not because of the market.
And if you look at the last year, the Hoang index was down and both companies show some resilience, so cattle is down not as much as the hang saying and BYD is down not as much as cattle.
So you understand that there is kind of resilience in the value creation because of the prospects investors have in mind about these two companies.
Now let's move to BYD first.
You know, build your dream.
Build your dream is not the name of the company.
It's a kind of motto for marketing reasons.
The name of the company initially is Yadi Electronics.
They added a B and it became B Yadis.
This is the name the company was created in 1995 by one Trunk fu.
At the very beginning it was about rechargeable batteries and predominantly for mobile phones.
In 2012, the company has more than a 50% market share in a mobile battery rechargeable battery.
The company went public in 2002 and a few weeks after the IPO, the company announced that they were getting into the car business with the acquisition of Han Wan automobile.
Interestingly, this acquisition was not even mentioned as a prospect in the IPO prospectus and the investors were a little bit emotion by the fact that the information was missing.
Okay, that's another story.
Now the company starts in the electrical vehicle and start with a plugging hybrid vehicle.
It is 2008, 2009 electric vehicle and now they are an extremely strong player in this business.
Just for the fund.
In 2008, Berkshire Hadaway Warren Buffet takes about 10% of BYD for eight Hong Kong dollars per share.
It's a cash out of $230 million, so it's quite significant, but if you look at the stock price in 2025 today, the price is $382.50.
The day I am recording this film, you understand that the initial investment made by Berkshire Hadaway was multiplied by 48 and today the value of this investment is $11 billion.
This is not bad if you compare the initial investment of 230 million.
Warren Buffet always said, it's not my credit, it's the credit of my partner Charlie Munger.
He had the idea congratulations and that's a great investment.
Now, initially they had 10%.
Today they have a little bit less than 5% because it's a bit easier in terms of publication and reporting as far as the value of the asset is concerned.
Initially B widely was in a battery business.
They progressively move to the car business and today the automotive business is producing 80% of their revenue, so it's quite dominant, no doubt about that.
The revenue is generated by the company in 2024.
I said a bit more than $100 billion, exactly $107 billion.
In the meantime, same year Tesla announced 98 billion.
Now BYD is billions and Tesla, more vehicles 4.3 million, but it combines hybrid and ev, it's about 32% market share in China, so it's the biggest EV company in China, and electric vehicles represent a bit more than 50% of the total vehicles which are sold in China.
How does it compare with Tesla in terms of number of vehicles, no hybrid of any kind of Tesla, just EV 1.8 million, which is much less than 4.3 million.
They are not sold on the same price.
Now in terms of volume B widely looks much bigger than Tesla in terms of market capitalization, it's a different story The day I'm recording this film, the stock market value, the market capitalization of BYD is $150 billion, which is not negligible, but Tesla is $850 billion.
The founder of the company was Mr.
Wong Chan Fu.
His wealth is estimated by Forbes $28 billion.
This is a commercial success but it is also a personal success as far as personal wealth is concerned.
Now let's move to cattle.
Cattle means contemporary and Parex X technology limited.
At the very beginning it was just named Amper X technology and it was in the electronic competence acquired by TDK, the Japanese company in this kind of industry with energy mobile IOT and so and so first, the part of the business which is devoted to the electric vehicle is spun off in 2011 from TDK.
Now the company immediately signed a corporation agreement in 2012 with the joint venture of BMW is brilliance in China.
Now BMW is dominant in the joint venture and it's a very important starting point in terms of agreement with large car manufacturers.
Now the company is extremely successful in 2016 there are number three behind PANACEK and BYD in terms of batteries for electric vehicles.
This is 20 16 20 17.
They moved from number three to number one and they are still number one by far.
If you look at the statistics which are produced by a research center based in Korea cattle for the period January to December, 2024, it's 38% worldwide market share for EV batteries number two, but quite far now is BYD.
Then you have a few players and so on so forth.
One is a bit more than 10%, the rest is 4% or less.
So you understand that the company's corporately dominant worldwide.
BYD was listed in 2002.
Cattle was listed more recently in 2018 IPO just on the Xang Z stock market.
So it's about a shares and ahas are reserves to investors operating in mainland China, which is quite interesting, but you are not open to the world and this is why the day you need money you need to probably broaden a little bit to scope in terms of internationalization of the investors funds raised at that time 760 million US dollars for a valuation of 11 billion.
To date, it's a little bit more 2018 factory in Germany for BNW announcement of a cooperation with Ford Electric vehicles Mustang Electric F 150 electric and also a plant which is going to be built in Michigan, same year announcement of a plant in Europe, central Europe in Hungary in 2023.
The company is number eight in terms of patents produced in the world.
So the company is very much invested in innovation research and the abundance is protecting its intellectual properties throughout the world.
2024 a year ago agreement with stellantis, you remember that St.
STIs is PSA plus Chrysler and they are going to create a joint venture 50 50, another factory now in Spain, which is going to cost a little bit more than 4 billion euros.
If you pile up all the investments which were announced by the company, it's about 14 billion US dollars.
It's quite a large amount of money and you need some financing.
This will be addressed a little bit later.
What is the valuation today roughly is the same as B, widely $150 billion.
The founder of the company, Mr.
Jan Hun, has an equity stake in the company and Forbes evaluates his own wealth at the level of $36 billion.
Again, it's a fantastic commercial success and it's not bad for the founder.
Now, very recently, a few weeks ago there was an announcement which was made between Baidu and cattle.
They announced that they were going to start producing, developing and producing autonomous driving systems.
Now if you produce the a DS, if you produce the battery, the next step is obviously the vehicle, the car itself, and then what's going to be very interesting is that be widely moved from the battery to the car and probably cattle is going to do the same, but the day you have 38% of worldwide market share, you are an extremely strong situation in order to become dominant in this kind industry, which in China is extremely competitive industry.
Now that was about this story.
Let's have a look at the financial metrics.
Financial metrics which return capital employed economic indicator, which tells you the performance of your business operations.
A strong element in the financial performance calculation of the company.
You remember that you for mulla rose return capital is return on sales, commercial profitability times assets, turnover, assets, productivity.
What is interesting if you look at BYD is that the return capital today is significantly more than yesterday, but it is only 15%.
What drove the evolution of the return capital employed in the last years is not that much evolution of the commercial profitability, which is quite low, four 5%.
Now what drove the rose up is the evolution of the assets turnover, which went up dramatically during the last years.
If you look at the same graph for capital, you understand that the return capital employed is also kind of 15% return on sales, not outstanding, a little bit growing throughout the years, but not dramatic economies of scale generated by volumes.
Then the assets turnover is driving the return capital employee, it's a bit more volatile, of course it's up, but it's more volatile than BYD for which it's steadily up.
Now if we summarize the construction of the rose, the return sales is constant for BYD four, five, all growing slowly for cattle from six to seven to 8%, but it's not that big.
It's not tremendous p and l, it is the assets turnover, which is driving the return capital employed against about 15% for both of them tripling for BY, D during the last years a bit variable even if it was a little bit of for cattle.
Now the return on capital employee, and that's a very important observation, is quite moderate, so these companies are creating a lot of value.
The stock price is skyrocketing, not the rose, and if you look at BYD as opposed to cattle, BYD, again it's 4.5% average times 3.2 for cattle is 7.5% times two.
The by the ends a day you get to 15%, you take the taxes out of that and you deduct the cost of capital.
The financial performance is not fantastic, but the market likes these two companies.
If you confront the return capital market to book, which are Jira speaking, quite correlated for companies which get to a certain level of maturity, there is a correlation here.
The correlation is not that obvious.
There is a kind of correlation and momentum, but what is very interesting if that for a company like biwa E, the rose is only 15 per cm and the market to book is three or it went up to four and five.
Today it's three, but three is quite a lot when you compare with the rose, which again should be calculated after tax minus the wh.
So at the end of the day there is some potential for growth in the market to book even though it was declining the last two years.
Same story for cattle.
The correlation is not that obvious between the return capital and the market to book, but this company is quite young and it's not yet quite stabilized.
Not 15% is the rose and the market to book is four.
So you understand that there is some credibility in terms of value creation as far as investors' opinions are concerned.
It's interesting to make a benchmark between B, y, D and cattle as far as credibility and performance are concerned.
Again, the rose is quite the same for both companies market to book more than four, four cattle, three, four, BYD.
But what is interesting is to look at the gearing because when you calculate the work it's weighted average cost of capillary is the cost of equity and cost of debt.
Pro ratta a respective investment made by shareholders on one side and financial operators on the other side.
No financial debt is absolutely marginal, a little bit positive for BYD, a little bit negative for cattle.
So the work is in fact the cost of equity.
The cost of equity is a long term government bond rate plus the market risk premium multiplied by the beta.
These companies are predominantly Chinese so the government bond rate is the same and the market risk premium is the same.
What makes a difference is the beta, and you remember I said that there was some resilience when the Hong saying went down, BYD was more resilient than cattle.
The consequences of beta, the beta is 0.64 BY, D and it is about one for cattle, but interestingly as the beta is higher for cattle, the W is higher because the W again is a cost of equity.
Now you understand that it generates the same rose, the wack of cattle is a little bit higher, which mean that the economic profit generated by cattle is less and the economic profit generated by BYD and the market to book is higher.
What conclusion do you take from that? You take a very simple conclusion.
If the economic profit of cattle is less than the economic profit of BYD, because again it is the same thing, but as the beta of cattle is greater than the beta of BYD, the wack of cattle is greater than the wack of BYD.
But if the market to book of cattle is higher than the market to book for BYD, it means that the gross prospect are significantly higher for cattle than BYD, which is quite interesting because if you look at the recent evolution of sales B white, it was skyrocketing and cattle was a little bit plateauing, but it's not in the announcements about investment factories and so on, which I'm going to develop.
Let's go back a minute to the financial structure of the company.
The financial structure is assessed by two indicators.
First debt as opposed to equity in book terms, so debt divided by equity, which you read in the bouncy or in market terms, which is debt divided by the market capitalization.
This is a financial structure and the ability of the company to repay its debt is named the leverage is debt divided by EBD.
If you look at both indicators for BYD, you understand that the company had quite a high leverage in 2000 12, 14, 15, et cetera, and then the gearing dramatically went down.
The leverage dramatically went down and you understand that today the company's indebtedness is extremely negligible as far as capital is concerned.
The financial structure was a little bit more stable.
On the graph you see some variability in the leverage.
It's because it's due to a B, D, A on one side and debt, which is a bit negative, a bit positive, so this is why there's some variability, but you understand that the financial structure of the financial strategy of capital was no debt and today the gearing is a little bit negative.
This is why net debt divided by a bid D is negative.
It's not because EBD is negative, it is because debt is negative.
So you understand that these two companies have another feature in common, very conservative financial strategies.
Now when you have almost no debt in the balance sheet or a little bit negative gearing, your flexibility is at its maximum level and that's great because when you have some flexibility in your balance sheet, you have the ability to grasp opportunities and exercise growth options.
Growth is about investment.
The companies want to grow, they need to invest and the need is kind of flexibility so it's perfectly consistent in terms of business as opposed to financial strategy.
Let's deep dive a little bit into the CapEx strategies of these two companies.
In order to assess the CapEx strategy of a company, there are two indicators.
One is CapEx as a percentage to revenues, which is about which percentage of your revenues you invest each and every year in developing the company.
And the other one is about intensity.
It's CapEx divided by depreciation.
Depreciation is a memory of the investment you made during the last years and CapEx is a CapEx of the year, so you confirm the CapEx of the year with a CapEx of yesterday and when you are CapEx divided by depreciation is more than one and significantly more than one.
It means that you are investing in capacity companies for which a ratio is about one.
They are maturity, CapEx, depreciation, no increase in capacity, just productivity and maintenance.
When the company's CapEx over depreciation is less than one, it means that the companies maybe only maintaining its manufacturing facilities and maybe outsourcing, but when it's greater than one it's about capacity and of course BY is extremely dynamic investing in production just to be able to serve the customers.
Of course there is a period where CapEx is less, it's in 2020.
This is about covid, but that's an accident that's an exception.
The company is investing dramatically cattle, same story.
The investment is a very high percentage to sales and revenues except during these two years, but we have observed that the company's volume and revenues are a little bit stabilizing.
In the meantime, there is plenty of announcement for new factories in Spain, in Michigan, in Hungary and so on and so forth.
It means that today is a kind of accident or temporarily we are down, but tomorrow it's going to be up again.
To summarize the investment strategies of these companies, very high CapEx to revenue ratios and very high CapEx depreciation by far CapEx exceed depreciation.
Though the companies are investing in production capacity and it's consistent with the fact that their revenues are growing.
Maybe not today but tomorrow.
Today is BYD.
Tomorrow it's cattle.
Plenty of announcements.
We are going to build new plants to produce.
The problem with growth is that it creates value if you are performing so if your rose is greater and your weight leverage cost of capital, but in any case, growth is consuming financial resources so you need to find the resources in order to fuel the growth of the company.
The first resource which you can mobilize is the profit you generate in business operations and this is the one we prefer.
We finance people.
If you are performing today and generating nice profits today as a consequence of good investments you made yesterday, then you have plenty of money in your pocket today in order to finance the evolution of your capacity.
But when you look at the p and l, you remember the return on sales is not skyrocketing and the return on sales is not outstanding.
If you look at the evolution of of the operating expenses of BYD, what do you observe? Cost of sales, cost of goods sold 80 to 90%, not much in terms of economies of scale a little bit this last years, but it does not seem to be outstanding.
There are some economies of scale in the indirect costs, s, g and a sales general and admin expenses and this went down by 1.5%, quite stable in terms of cost of sales and what about r and d? The company's massively investing in research development and innovation and as a consequence the figure went up not only in absolute terms but relative to revenues.
R and d went up from 2.5% to 6% of revenue.
This is why maybe the company is generating some economies scale for indirect cost.
Maybe the cost of sales is a bit down when you know what you invest not only in tangible assets but also in innovation.
Intangibles, r and d for cattle it's a little bit different story.
The SGNA figure went dramatically up.
They saved about 4.5%.
What about the cost of sales? It went up dramatically at the very beginning of the story in 2019 to 2020 then there is a kind of stabilization and today some economies of scale r and d constant about 5% of revenues waste fluctuations obviously, but there is no specific trend.
The companies investing a lot, plenty of patterns.
You remember number eight in the world in 2023 and the company is keeping on investing in research and development.
Now you understand that the commercial profitability is not outstanding.
If you want to finance your capital expenditures, you are going to calculate the free cash flow in which the resource is EBDA.
What we discussed so far is the EBIT return on sales is EBIT divided by revenues.
EBITDA A is EBIT before you deduct the precision and amortization the consequence of your past investment.
The cash operating profit, which is EBDA, went down for cattle for a number of reasons, including the fact that the cost of sales was up and now he's stabilizing.
What about BYD? Relatively stable, but it does not seem that these companies are privileging their p and l in the short run.
The return on sales are quite stable or a little bit up, but it's absolutely not outstanding.
The problem is that with your EBIT deal you have to be able to finance your working capital requirement and your capital expenditures.
Let's have a look at the evolutionary working capital requirement, which is a consequence of managing your operating cycle.
You remember that inventories plus receivables minus payables, it's a monnet which is stock in the operating cycle and we finance people we like very much.
When you can reduce a working capital requirement because it's money which is no more in the operating cycle but invested in value generating non current asset investment factories, brands whatsoever.
If you look at BYD, you understand that there was a very negative and then positive evolution of the cash conversion cycle.
It was quite high up to 150 days of revenues.
Today it's a bit less.
Why? Because the company started managing its accounts receivable.
It's nice to sell to your customers but it's even better to collect the money from them and because also the accounts payable dramatically went up it now 150 days, so suppliers were a little bit mobilized in order to reduce a working capital requirement.
Today the cash conversion cycle is quite stabilized at the level which is a little bit negative.
No problem, no more problem, but the working capital requirement is at breakeven.
I would say same conclusion, not exactly the same process and dynamics for cattle, but what they have in common is the fact that the accounts payable went up, which is not very nice for the suppliers.
Inventories went up and down and accounts receiv went down and it's quite stable for cattle, but again, the cash conversion cycle is a little bit negative stabilized, so it's no more problem and then the working capital requirement is quite stable, not consuming, not generating cash.
Therefore both companies a working capital requirement is not a problem, it's not anymore a problem and we have to thank very much the nice and certainly happy contribution of the suppliers in terms of increase in the accounts payable just to wrap up on CapEx to revenues for BYD and cattle, but then on the same slide you understand that as far as BYD is concerned, CapEx is about 15% of revenues, which is quite high cattle.
In the past it was a bit more than 25% it went down.
It'll certainly go up the JU up to open the factories, which you announced $14 billion.
Now the working capital requirement is close to zero, so the question is does EBDA fine on the capital expenditures? You simply divide EBDA by CapEx.
If it's more than one, it means that e BDA is large enough so that your free cash flow is positive in the long term.
So we compare the ratio with one and we understand that with very few exceptions, the ratio is less than one, so the PDA does not fine on the capital expenditures.
Of course, when you stop CapEx because of covid, the A BDA is financing the CapEx because there's no CapEx anymore or something like that.
Now in the last years the ratio is a little bit up.
It's strictly greater than one for cattle.
It's about one in 2024 for BYD, but you understand that at the end of the day the company's profitability is not very high, but the CapEx figure is very high and so you will need some extra additional financial resources.
EBDA does not finance the industrial investment in the long term.
Now, how do you finance your investment? You need external resources.
When the internal resources are not smart enough to finance CapEx and Rev, you can ask the government and then there is an aid, a financial aid which comes from the state.
We all know that it's about subsidies, it's about regulations, it's about infrastructure in order to support the development of your sales.
It's about bringing some innovation, cash to finance, innovation, tax reductions and so on and so forth.
Of course, a Chinese government supported the car industry quite a lot.
It's obviously extremely difficult to give a figure, which is certainly the right figure.
There are some estimates about $230 billion, which is quite a lot and it's quite interesting because on the one hand the Chinese government is supporting the industry.
On the other hand, there is a fierce competition in China to try to identify who the winner is going to be in the future, but what is extremely interesting as far as BYD is concerned, BYD was a little bit in difficulties in 2017 to 2019.
The CEO said it were terrible euros for us and at that time the Chinese government provided some support.
Your company, which is quite interesting for the country, you are in trouble.
We're going to give you some oxygen so that during these difficult times you can recover a little bit and that's quite interesting because it significantly reduces the risk of the company.
You can take a risk when you know that if you have taken and selected the right investment, you know that if by accident there are some difficult times, you are going to be supported by those people who are mutualizing.
The risk at the country level, which is named the state, that's quite interesting in terms of industrial policy, it's just giving money when needed because there is an accident and you have to go through.
Now we are closer to the conclusion you want to grow, you need financial resources, your profitability is modest, your rose is 15, it's certainly not enough and you have plenty of industrial ambitious.
In the meantime, you keep a conservative financial policy.
Know that in the balance sheet, so who is going to finance your growth? Not the bankers, but if it's not the bankers and if it's not your profitability inside, then it's about the shareholders.
The dividend which is paid by both companies is a little bit positive but not that big.
Of course, you're not going to waste your earnings returning the cash to shareholders, but then what's going to happen? You need your shareholders and then you need to have access to the equity market.
This concept is named sustainable growth if you want to grow and if your profitability inside is not enough, it's bankers and it's a shareholders.
If the bankers are out of the pictures, it's a shareholders.
Let's go back to equity, B-Y-D-I-P-O In 2002 funds raised 180 million Samsung in the battery business understanding that there was something big happening at BYD 2016.
Samsung is injecting $450 million 2021 open market equity issue, 1.8 billion 2024, quasi equity perpetual bonds.
So you issue the bonds and there is no termination date for that.
$2 billion 20, 25.
Hey folks, we need money.
$5.6 billion and it's absolutely mechanical cattle.
Recent IPO 2018, you remember the figure 760 million raised from capital market, a very big contribution of Hill House U-B-S-G-P, Morgan Honda car business, 2.8 billion in 2020 for premo valuation of 50 billion.
Now the company is listed in the SHE stock market.
It is very restricted in terms of investors portfolio.
You have to broaden the scope and then it's no more a shares in Shanghai or in Xang.
Zhen.
It is H shares on the Hong Kong stock exchange and cattle announced that they are going to make a dual listing.
Xang Zhen Hong Kong 2025 amount.
Difficult to assess.
The minimum as it is communicated by the company is 5 billion, but in the prospectus there are some comments which uh, might drive the equity issue up to $8 billion.
You simply need that because you have to finance your growth, you have to finance your factories, your plans.
Why are these capitals investing for the leadership? You remember the famous statement, Jeff Bezos, we will continue to make investment decisions in order to reach the long term market leadership, whatever the profit in the short run, whatever the opinion of Wall Street he added.
So you want to invest because you are a leader.
You want to be a leader in the long term, but if you invest, you're growing and if you're growing, you're consuming financial resources.
Are you going to grow in China? Probably because the market is up, but that is also very much in their mind is the development overseas.
And what is nice with overseas is that the prices for the vehicles are not exactly the same.
On the picture here, you see two cars which are quite the same.
It is the BYD ATO three.
There is another name in China.
Of course there are a little bit of differences because the regulations and constraints are a bit different.
In China, the car is sold at the price, which is 17,000 US dollars.
In Western Europe it is 47,000 US dollars.
So you understand that behind the investment, of course the opex and the cost of sales are not going to be quite the same, but you have in mind this kind of profit.
But in order to generate a profit tomorrow you have to invest today.
If you want to invest today, you need the financial resources.
The alternative could be debt.
Oh, that is very risky.
Then you select to go for shareholders equity.
Ah, yes, but there is a dilution problems.
This is why sometimes some companies they want to avoid equity issue because they don't want to be diluted.
They don't want to lose the power.
It's a case of some family businesses.
But here, if you accept dilution, that's okay.
And then you can finance your growth with equity.
If you don't want to be diluted and if you don't want to take the risk of your debt and you have to grow and consume resources, then you could raise your prices in order to improve your margins and your rose and then you self-finance your growth.
And fortunately the Chinese market is extremely competitive and it's impossible to increase your margins locally because the competition is fierce.
And so at the end of the day, you have to go overseas.
You want to invest, you want to be a leader.
You don't want to take the risk in your debt, you accept the delusion.
It is simply mechanical and you understand that the day you want to maximize your profit.
Sometimes it is at the expense of the clients.
You remember there are a few fills on the platform which are about, oh, there's inflation on the cost.
I increase my prices, yes, but if I lose my clients, if I lose my volume, that's probably not a good idea.
In terms of long term market leadership.
If you are in a period of con querying your market share, forget about your short term profit, it's about long term.
Ah, you look at the long term, but you also have to make money in the short term and if you don't make enough money in the short term, you need to go for equity.
It's always this kind of tension of conflict between short term and long term decision taken.
No debt equity delusion, no problem.
Billions of dollars and not only for B, y, D and cattle.
Last year, Jerry, a common factor in China is announcing the IPO and the Hong Kong stock exchange.
The figures which are mentioned today are about 1 billion OMI in the smartphone business.
They want to raise $5.5 billion in order to get into the EV business.
So you understand that it's already densely populated and the crowd is growing.
This is why you need quite a lot of equity and getting to overseas investment is probably a great idea.
You understand that 5 billion seems to be a figure, a consensus in terms of equity issue in the car industry in China.
Thank you very much.