Educational Film, March 2025 // Xerox: Debt or synergies
Educational Film, March 2025 // Xerox: Debt or synergies
Xerox, a pioneer in printing and computing technologies (with the famous Xerox PARC), missed key opportunities, such as the commercial exploitation of the graphical user interface, which was left to Apple and Microsoft. Its failure to adapt to the digital transition and the rise of cloud computing has relegated it to a secondary role. Today, despite the merger with Lexmark, Xerox survives mainly on printing and document management services, a far cry from its former stature as a major innovator.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:07.465 --> 00:00:10.135
Hello and welcome to this educational film which is
2
00:00:10.245 --> 00:00:13.295
devoted to the merger of Xerox
3
00:00:13.795 --> 00:00:16.015
and Lexmark in the printing industry.
4
00:00:17.075 --> 00:00:20.135
I'm not going to elaborate too much about the deal itself.
5
00:00:20.315 --> 00:00:22.335
I'm going to insist very much on the management
6
00:00:22.335 --> 00:00:26.375
of technological innovation, inventions innovation
7
00:00:26.875 --> 00:00:31.215
and all the missed opportunities at Xerox in the first years
8
00:00:31.315 --> 00:00:35.175
of its existence, there are very well known statements made
9
00:00:35.235 --> 00:00:37.895
by Xerox and missed opportunity.
10
00:00:38.345 --> 00:00:41.015
Could have owned the entire computer industry.
11
00:00:41.315 --> 00:00:43.495
It could have been the IBM of the nineties
12
00:00:43.515 --> 00:00:45.095
and Microsoft the nineties
13
00:00:46.075 --> 00:00:47.695
and at the end of the day who said
14
00:00:47.695 --> 00:00:50.575
that very well known person whose name is Steve Jobs
15
00:00:51.515 --> 00:00:55.255
in 1995, Steve Jobs is interviewed at that time,
16
00:00:55.275 --> 00:00:58.535
his normal at Apple are not yet at Apple.
17
00:00:58.785 --> 00:01:00.695
Again, he is a manager
18
00:01:00.835 --> 00:01:04.735
and owner of next, which is going to produce the OSX.
19
00:01:05.715 --> 00:01:08.775
He holds 51% of Pixar.
20
00:01:09.065 --> 00:01:13.295
Pixar is going to produce Toy Story in 95, which is going
21
00:01:13.295 --> 00:01:16.535
to be the beginning of a stratospheric career of Pixar,
22
00:01:16.925 --> 00:01:19.415
leading eventually to the sale to Disney
23
00:01:19.635 --> 00:01:21.215
for seven point some billion.
24
00:01:21.795 --> 00:01:24.215
So Steve Jobs is interviewed, it's going
25
00:01:24.215 --> 00:01:26.455
to be named the lost interview.
26
00:01:26.675 --> 00:01:28.055
Why? Because it's been lost
27
00:01:28.555 --> 00:01:31.575
and during about 20 years nobody knows where exactly
28
00:01:32.195 --> 00:01:33.375
the video he is.
29
00:01:33.555 --> 00:01:36.575
We have some extracts of the podcast and that's it.
30
00:01:37.075 --> 00:01:39.055
It was found again and it's available
31
00:01:39.275 --> 00:01:43.695
and it is a mind blowing course in technological innovation.
32
00:01:44.875 --> 00:01:47.015
Now, Steve Jobs is going to explain the reasons
33
00:01:47.075 --> 00:01:48.535
of the failure of Xerox.
34
00:01:49.035 --> 00:01:52.015
He says, well, if you look at companies Jerry speaking at X,
35
00:01:52.315 --> 00:01:55.535
you have a success and the success comes from an
36
00:01:55.535 --> 00:01:56.575
innovative product.
37
00:01:57.755 --> 00:01:58.935
Ts is an innovative product.
38
00:01:59.075 --> 00:02:03.575
You create a monopole because you are far beyond everybody
39
00:02:03.965 --> 00:02:06.815
because you are protected your business with a portfolio
40
00:02:06.815 --> 00:02:09.335
of patents, protection and so on and so forth.
41
00:02:09.715 --> 00:02:11.255
So this is the beginning of the story
42
00:02:11.315 --> 00:02:14.375
and then you keep on with the pursuit of this story
43
00:02:15.035 --> 00:02:16.695
and it's about improving the product.
44
00:02:17.045 --> 00:02:18.695
It's about maximizing sales.
45
00:02:19.355 --> 00:02:21.215
So who is in charge of the success?
46
00:02:21.445 --> 00:02:23.935
Next step, marketing and sales.
47
00:02:24.395 --> 00:02:27.215
So the marketing and sales team is going to be the source
48
00:02:27.215 --> 00:02:29.375
of success is why this guys going
49
00:02:29.375 --> 00:02:30.895
to be promoted in the company
50
00:02:31.275 --> 00:02:32.615
and they're going to be the senior
51
00:02:32.615 --> 00:02:33.655
management of the company.
52
00:02:33.795 --> 00:02:37.215
The company is led by the sales and marketing team.
53
00:02:37.915 --> 00:02:39.135
Now what about products?
54
00:02:39.165 --> 00:02:42.215
Product is outside their concerns
55
00:02:42.675 --> 00:02:45.215
and for a number of reasons, including time horizon
56
00:02:45.965 --> 00:02:47.215
when you're in charge of sales
57
00:02:47.235 --> 00:02:50.655
and marketing, your objective is next week, next month,
58
00:02:50.765 --> 00:02:53.335
next quarter, next year when you're in charge
59
00:02:53.335 --> 00:02:56.375
of product development, your time horizon about years,
60
00:02:57.225 --> 00:03:00.245
maybe 10 years if it is a disruptive innovation.
61
00:03:00.785 --> 00:03:03.565
So you understand that the product teams are
62
00:03:04.125 --> 00:03:05.645
absolutely not listened to
63
00:03:06.225 --> 00:03:07.685
by the sales and marketing people.
64
00:03:07.685 --> 00:03:12.245
It's a very traditional dilemma between exploration product
65
00:03:12.665 --> 00:03:15.445
and exploitation, sales and marketing.
66
00:03:16.785 --> 00:03:18.845
At the end of the day, if you look at the story
67
00:03:19.025 --> 00:03:21.245
of Xerox at the beginning of the story,
68
00:03:21.405 --> 00:03:25.125
a gentleman whose name is Chester Carson, not invented,
69
00:03:25.385 --> 00:03:29.285
but one of the very first pioneers of electro photography,
70
00:03:29.655 --> 00:03:33.605
which is going to replace a chemical photography whose icon
71
00:03:33.665 --> 00:03:38.205
is obviously Eastman Co Eastman Coac is producing Copers,
72
00:03:38.345 --> 00:03:42.085
but they are all working operating based on the technology
73
00:03:42.085 --> 00:03:44.445
which is about chemical photography.
74
00:03:45.355 --> 00:03:47.325
Then you can copy a little bit,
75
00:03:47.585 --> 00:03:51.045
you get something which is not exactly dry, you have
76
00:03:51.045 --> 00:03:52.045
to dry it,
77
00:03:52.585 --> 00:03:55.405
and what zero is about, it's about
78
00:03:55.985 --> 00:03:59.765
dry copying concept is going to first propose the patterns
79
00:03:59.765 --> 00:04:01.165
and the innovation to the company,
80
00:04:01.215 --> 00:04:02.485
which is living next door.
81
00:04:03.095 --> 00:04:04.405
Whose name is Isman?
82
00:04:04.785 --> 00:04:08.645
AK Rochester, New York because he lived there, right?
83
00:04:08.745 --> 00:04:12.845
And Kodak is going to refuse, reject this innovation. Why?
84
00:04:13.315 --> 00:04:17.125
Because all the researchers are in organic chemicals.
85
00:04:17.125 --> 00:04:20.645
They have been trained to do so they know this technology
86
00:04:20.745 --> 00:04:22.165
and there's a guy who is saying,
87
00:04:22.355 --> 00:04:23.885
your technology is outdated.
88
00:04:24.125 --> 00:04:25.365
I have something which is brand new
89
00:04:25.585 --> 00:04:28.085
and which is going to completely change your business.
90
00:04:28.235 --> 00:04:31.405
They're rejected. It's a very famous syndrome
91
00:04:32.265 --> 00:04:33.645
not invented here.
92
00:04:34.435 --> 00:04:38.085
International business machines is also going
93
00:04:38.105 --> 00:04:42.725
to reject innovation and ironically later on Kodak
94
00:04:42.905 --> 00:04:46.285
and IBM are going to produce photocopiers,
95
00:04:46.465 --> 00:04:48.285
but they both miss the opportunity
96
00:04:48.705 --> 00:04:51.125
of taking the patent in the first years.
97
00:04:51.505 --> 00:04:54.205
Now, who accepted this technology, A small company
98
00:04:54.775 --> 00:04:58.045
based in Rochester, New York whose name is Helo Company.
99
00:04:58.635 --> 00:05:01.565
They are in the photographic equipment and so on, so forth.
100
00:05:02.145 --> 00:05:04.805
And so the CEO is going to say this is a great invention.
101
00:05:05.665 --> 00:05:09.525
So he bought the patent, he started producing equipment.
102
00:05:09.985 --> 00:05:14.765
Cop initially transformed the name from Halo to Halo, Xerox
103
00:05:15.105 --> 00:05:18.925
and it became Xerox first base in Rochester, New York.
104
00:05:18.925 --> 00:05:21.725
Then moved to Stanford, Connecticut.
105
00:05:21.905 --> 00:05:23.805
Now after the innovation, you have the product.
106
00:05:24.145 --> 00:05:28.845
The first product is named Xerox nine 14.
107
00:05:29.225 --> 00:05:32.565
It was produced and sold in 1959
108
00:05:33.385 --> 00:05:34.765
and if you see on the picture,
109
00:05:35.355 --> 00:05:38.685
it's a very big stuff whose design is a
110
00:05:38.685 --> 00:05:39.845
little bit approximate.
111
00:05:40.195 --> 00:05:41.205
What are the features
112
00:05:41.265 --> 00:05:44.245
of this first photocopier first is very big.
113
00:05:45.075 --> 00:05:49.965
It's heavy more than 300 kilograms, so it's not the kind
114
00:05:49.965 --> 00:05:51.205
of thing you can move easily
115
00:05:51.665 --> 00:05:55.485
and it's very expensive, $400,000
116
00:05:55.985 --> 00:05:57.805
as people private business
117
00:05:58.105 --> 00:06:00.525
and companies cannot pay this amount upfront.
118
00:06:01.235 --> 00:06:04.005
It's going to be leased by Xerox,
119
00:06:04.305 --> 00:06:07.125
so their rental business is going to start on lease.
120
00:06:07.255 --> 00:06:11.645
Activ is going to be a very significant profit generator in
121
00:06:11.645 --> 00:06:13.805
the company at the very beginning.
122
00:06:14.115 --> 00:06:18.645
Technically the copier produces seven copies per minute,
123
00:06:18.935 --> 00:06:22.445
which is absolutely not big, but it's fast growing
124
00:06:22.545 --> 00:06:25.245
and it's going to be dozens per minute quite quickly.
125
00:06:26.305 --> 00:06:30.325
Now the competitors are the classic traditional copiers,
126
00:06:30.555 --> 00:06:35.285
east man Coda, which are much less expensive, 300 to $400,
127
00:06:35.665 --> 00:06:38.725
but they're producing one to two copies per minute
128
00:06:39.225 --> 00:06:41.765
and then you have to wait for the moment, it's dry
129
00:06:41.765 --> 00:06:42.845
before you can use it.
130
00:06:43.265 --> 00:06:46.245
Now the technology is not completely mature as far
131
00:06:46.245 --> 00:06:48.085
as the nine 14 is concerned
132
00:06:48.085 --> 00:06:51.365
because when there's a paper jam inside the equipment,
133
00:06:51.515 --> 00:06:53.885
sometimes the equipment catches fire.
134
00:06:54.515 --> 00:06:56.725
This is why you need to put a cavity
135
00:06:56.785 --> 00:06:58.685
for the fire extinguisher.
136
00:06:59.315 --> 00:07:02.325
There's a paper jam, it catches fire and
137
00:07:02.545 --> 00:07:05.525
and you use the extinguisher a little bit later on.
138
00:07:05.755 --> 00:07:08.325
This feature disappeared from the functioning
139
00:07:08.425 --> 00:07:11.285
of the equipment and the commercial point of view.
140
00:07:11.315 --> 00:07:12.565
It's an outstanding success.
141
00:07:12.625 --> 00:07:15.405
The first machine is sold in 1959.
142
00:07:15.945 --> 00:07:18.965
In 1961, the revenues generated
143
00:07:19.025 --> 00:07:23.045
by sales are about $60 million in 65,
144
00:07:23.435 --> 00:07:25.485
more than $500 million
145
00:07:25.785 --> 00:07:26.885
and the company is going
146
00:07:26.885 --> 00:07:29.525
to start going at the speed of flight.
147
00:07:30.235 --> 00:07:34.165
It's going to adv or it become the Fifteenth's largest
148
00:07:34.315 --> 00:07:36.245
company in the United States.
149
00:07:36.675 --> 00:07:39.205
Outstanding success as a consequence
150
00:07:39.225 --> 00:07:40.805
of being in the monopoly,
151
00:07:41.305 --> 00:07:43.925
the company is generating considerable margins
152
00:07:44.625 --> 00:07:47.605
and then the question is, where do you invest your margin?
153
00:07:48.105 --> 00:07:49.405
Or you can pay dividend,
154
00:07:49.505 --> 00:07:51.165
of course you can buy back your shares.
155
00:07:51.165 --> 00:07:55.885
Of course you can reinvent the corporation product renewal
156
00:07:56.505 --> 00:07:58.565
and this is what they're going to try to do.
157
00:08:00.145 --> 00:08:02.325
In 1969, the regime
158
00:08:02.785 --> 00:08:06.285
and in 1970 they opened the pillow.
159
00:08:06.355 --> 00:08:10.285
Palo Alto Research Centers a very famous park.
160
00:08:10.555 --> 00:08:13.165
It's based in Palo Alto in California
161
00:08:14.145 --> 00:08:17.045
and it's going to welcome a few researchers.
162
00:08:17.135 --> 00:08:20.885
First a few dozens, then 100, 150.
163
00:08:21.075 --> 00:08:24.125
It's never going to be a army of researchers.
164
00:08:24.305 --> 00:08:27.965
Not too many people maximum 400 researchers,
165
00:08:28.465 --> 00:08:30.365
but these are geniuses.
166
00:08:30.745 --> 00:08:34.565
You put a few geniuses in the world, you give them freedom.
167
00:08:34.705 --> 00:08:38.205
You say, Hey guys, develop the office of the future.
168
00:08:38.635 --> 00:08:41.285
They are going to be extremely successful in a technology
169
00:08:41.285 --> 00:08:44.045
called point of view and they're going to produce dozens of
170
00:08:44.705 --> 00:08:48.365
Brexit innovations, which are still extremely valid
171
00:08:48.705 --> 00:08:50.645
and used in our daily life today.
172
00:08:51.175 --> 00:08:55.245
Among the inventions Alto, the first personal computer
173
00:08:55.855 --> 00:08:59.885
which was developed in 1973, you remember
174
00:08:59.885 --> 00:09:03.085
that Apple one was produced by Steve Jobs
175
00:09:03.305 --> 00:09:07.325
and Steve Nia in 76, 77,
176
00:09:08.275 --> 00:09:10.925
they developed a graphical user interface,
177
00:09:11.595 --> 00:09:13.205
mind blowing innovation.
178
00:09:13.955 --> 00:09:16.125
Another innovation is with a wig.
179
00:09:16.155 --> 00:09:17.925
What you see is what you get, okay?
180
00:09:17.925 --> 00:09:20.685
You want to print something you see on the screen
181
00:09:20.985 --> 00:09:22.525
and what you see on the screen is going
182
00:09:22.525 --> 00:09:26.285
to be reproduced on the paper, which is definitely a plus.
183
00:09:27.105 --> 00:09:29.685
Now they notice that the alto computers were not
184
00:09:29.715 --> 00:09:30.765
that powerful.
185
00:09:31.225 --> 00:09:34.765
In order to transform that into a more powerful pc,
186
00:09:35.265 --> 00:09:38.245
you link them, you link them with a network
187
00:09:38.625 --> 00:09:40.605
and the network going to be ethernet
188
00:09:40.625 --> 00:09:42.845
and they are going to develop at the part the seven
189
00:09:42.845 --> 00:09:44.405
layers of ethernet.
190
00:09:45.185 --> 00:09:46.205
Now you want to print
191
00:09:46.265 --> 00:09:47.965
but you don't need a printer per machine.
192
00:09:47.965 --> 00:09:50.885
You want to share the printer. It's going to be on internet.
193
00:09:51.505 --> 00:09:53.405
And in addition to that, instead
194
00:09:53.405 --> 00:09:56.885
of these all very noisy printers, you replace at
195
00:09:56.905 --> 00:09:59.805
by something which is extremely powerful, high quality
196
00:10:00.335 --> 00:10:02.445
laser printer, which uses more
197
00:10:02.445 --> 00:10:04.605
or less the same technology as a photocopy
198
00:10:05.465 --> 00:10:09.125
and also you want to share messages and so on and so forth.
199
00:10:09.345 --> 00:10:10.645
You develop a technology
200
00:10:10.945 --> 00:10:13.605
and this technology is going to become Internet
201
00:10:14.555 --> 00:10:18.525
park did not develop internet park developed innovation
202
00:10:18.525 --> 00:10:22.085
science to which basically 50% of what was needed
203
00:10:22.105 --> 00:10:24.565
to develop internet was created.
204
00:10:24.905 --> 00:10:27.965
So there were major contributor, et cetera,
205
00:10:28.305 --> 00:10:29.325
et cetera, et cetera.
206
00:10:29.505 --> 00:10:32.765
Now the reputation of the park is absolutely outstanding,
207
00:10:33.025 --> 00:10:34.685
so they are going to receive some visits.
208
00:10:35.415 --> 00:10:38.725
Apple is created in 76, 77.
209
00:10:38.975 --> 00:10:42.125
Steve Jobs visit the park in 79
210
00:10:42.945 --> 00:10:45.845
and in the interview I already imagined he's going
211
00:10:45.845 --> 00:10:48.645
to mention the fact that he's been fascinated
212
00:10:48.785 --> 00:10:51.285
by the graphical user interface.
213
00:10:51.865 --> 00:10:53.445
Of course he's going to say there were plenty
214
00:10:53.465 --> 00:10:55.005
of other things to do the shopping,
215
00:10:55.345 --> 00:10:57.565
but that was absolutely mind blowing.
216
00:10:57.915 --> 00:11:00.285
He's going to sign a deal with Xox, he's going
217
00:11:00.285 --> 00:11:03.765
to pay his Apple shares value.
218
00:11:03.895 --> 00:11:07.805
About $1 million at that time went up later on.
219
00:11:08.435 --> 00:11:10.125
It's going to pay the ability
220
00:11:10.385 --> 00:11:13.685
and the right to do a kind of shopping inside the park
221
00:11:14.145 --> 00:11:15.605
and he's going to do the shopping
222
00:11:16.305 --> 00:11:18.885
and with what he is going to buy, he's going to be able
223
00:11:18.885 --> 00:11:22.605
to develop Liza Macintosh and so on so forth.
224
00:11:23.435 --> 00:11:24.805
Sometimes people say
225
00:11:24.805 --> 00:11:27.205
that the mouse was invented at the park.
226
00:11:27.345 --> 00:11:29.685
Now it was very much developed at the park,
227
00:11:29.745 --> 00:11:32.125
but initially it comes from the Stanford
228
00:11:32.765 --> 00:11:33.805
research institutes.
229
00:11:33.985 --> 00:11:35.325
The neighbor next door
230
00:11:36.095 --> 00:11:39.645
after Steve Jobs, bill Gates is also going to visit the park
231
00:11:40.465 --> 00:11:43.525
and Bill Gates said, well, I took plenty of ideas
232
00:11:43.585 --> 00:11:47.965
to develop windows from what I've seen in the park.
233
00:11:48.965 --> 00:11:52.445
Interestingly, later on, Steve Jobs accused Bill Gates of
234
00:11:53.085 --> 00:11:54.685
stealing what was in the park,
235
00:11:55.345 --> 00:11:57.205
but there was a very interesting
236
00:11:57.385 --> 00:12:00.045
and humoristic answer from Bill Gates.
237
00:12:00.555 --> 00:12:01.925
Well, Steve, you know what?
238
00:12:02.065 --> 00:12:03.565
We were both the neighbor
239
00:12:03.865 --> 00:12:06.685
of a rich Kaepernick's name was the rocks.
240
00:12:07.235 --> 00:12:11.365
When I broke into the house to steal the tv, I understood
241
00:12:11.365 --> 00:12:13.645
that you had already stolen the tv,
242
00:12:13.895 --> 00:12:15.605
which is exactly what happened.
243
00:12:15.605 --> 00:12:17.485
Steve Jobs did the shopping first
244
00:12:17.985 --> 00:12:19.005
and what was left,
245
00:12:19.515 --> 00:12:22.365
basically Bill Gates did the additional shopping.
246
00:12:24.385 --> 00:12:27.845
Now the reasons for the fear what has been named
247
00:12:27.865 --> 00:12:30.685
by academics, the competency trap,
248
00:12:30.905 --> 00:12:35.045
of course it's about exploitation versus exploration.
249
00:12:35.665 --> 00:12:37.885
One competency is very much about sales
250
00:12:37.885 --> 00:12:40.525
and market can develop on productivity, et cetera.
251
00:12:40.785 --> 00:12:42.685
The other one is about inventing.
252
00:12:43.015 --> 00:12:46.285
There is a trap, you move into one, you lose the other.
253
00:12:47.145 --> 00:12:49.565
But there are a few additional points which I would like
254
00:12:49.565 --> 00:12:52.685
to point out the length of the sales cycle.
255
00:12:53.515 --> 00:12:55.565
I've been privileged to work at Xerox,
256
00:12:55.625 --> 00:12:59.045
the finance department at that time in the eighties,
257
00:12:59.065 --> 00:13:01.805
and I could observe the fact that it was extremely difficult
258
00:13:01.825 --> 00:13:06.485
for the French subsidiary to hire good salespeople
259
00:13:07.195 --> 00:13:09.125
because a good salespeople,
260
00:13:09.275 --> 00:13:12.285
they were all working in a co business.
261
00:13:12.705 --> 00:13:17.245
In a co business, a sales cycle is a few days, a few weeks
262
00:13:17.865 --> 00:13:19.125
for individuals.
263
00:13:19.265 --> 00:13:21.725
For large companies it's a few months,
264
00:13:22.265 --> 00:13:25.685
but you know what, you immediately get your bonus on the
265
00:13:25.765 --> 00:13:27.845
price of the copay you have sold to the company.
266
00:13:29.065 --> 00:13:31.125
If you want to sell ethernet
267
00:13:31.265 --> 00:13:34.645
and the associated equipments, it takes yours.
268
00:13:35.075 --> 00:13:36.965
It's not the same time horizon
269
00:13:37.465 --> 00:13:40.845
and which kind of bonus do you get initially a percentage
270
00:13:40.905 --> 00:13:44.045
of the ethernet cable you have installed in the building,
271
00:13:44.535 --> 00:13:46.045
which is absolutely peanut.
272
00:13:46.505 --> 00:13:50.645
Of course, later on you are going to sell laser printers
273
00:13:50.705 --> 00:13:52.925
and so on and so forth, and the policy is going
274
00:13:52.925 --> 00:13:54.165
to be very much postponed,
275
00:13:54.175 --> 00:13:57.125
which is absolutely not in the mind of the salespeople.
276
00:13:57.425 --> 00:13:59.765
So it was impossible to hire good
277
00:14:00.275 --> 00:14:05.085
salespeople at Xerox in France, everywhere else I guess.
278
00:14:05.865 --> 00:14:09.885
And also there was an interesting cultural gap between sales
279
00:14:09.945 --> 00:14:11.165
and marketing r
280
00:14:11.165 --> 00:14:14.005
and d of course time Horizon and so on and so forth.
281
00:14:14.385 --> 00:14:15.885
But you know what? Sales
282
00:14:15.905 --> 00:14:19.125
and marketing head office, Stanford, Connecticut, east Coast
283
00:14:20.075 --> 00:14:22.365
Park, Palo Alto, west coast,
284
00:14:22.865 --> 00:14:25.285
and these guys, it just could not talk to each other.
285
00:14:26.405 --> 00:14:29.525
I had the privilege to meet some people working at the park
286
00:14:29.985 --> 00:14:31.365
and they used to tell me, you know,
287
00:14:31.365 --> 00:14:33.725
it's very funny when we observe those sales
288
00:14:33.745 --> 00:14:35.605
and marketing people who are dressed like sales
289
00:14:35.605 --> 00:14:39.205
and marketing people coming from east coast to to visit us,
290
00:14:39.865 --> 00:14:41.805
we are dressed like researchers.
291
00:14:42.425 --> 00:14:44.485
And so at the end of the day, uh,
292
00:14:44.625 --> 00:14:48.245
you see people in the research department in the park
293
00:14:48.475 --> 00:14:51.245
with a guitar on the shoulder, uh, barefoot
294
00:14:51.365 --> 00:14:53.645
because you know shoes, it's not that comfortable.
295
00:14:54.065 --> 00:14:57.205
You are allowed to bring your personal pets in the office.
296
00:14:57.705 --> 00:15:00.125
So you can bring your cat, you can bring your dog,
297
00:15:00.425 --> 00:15:03.205
and for a researcher, the pet was a python.
298
00:15:03.745 --> 00:15:05.765
So you want to take a coffee with your colleagues,
299
00:15:05.765 --> 00:15:07.485
you leave your python on the chair,
300
00:15:08.065 --> 00:15:11.165
no problem about security, nobody's going
301
00:15:11.165 --> 00:15:12.245
to get into your office.
302
00:15:12.705 --> 00:15:14.925
You understand the cultural gap, which was
303
00:15:15.485 --> 00:15:16.565
absolutely tremendous.
304
00:15:16.975 --> 00:15:19.285
These people could not talk to each other.
305
00:15:19.665 --> 00:15:21.525
So there were visits from outside,
306
00:15:22.265 --> 00:15:24.685
but there were also missed opportunities from inside.
307
00:15:25.825 --> 00:15:27.085
Uh, one day a couple
308
00:15:27.145 --> 00:15:30.165
of researchers saying they had developed something which was
309
00:15:30.165 --> 00:15:32.205
quite interesting about pictures,
310
00:15:32.295 --> 00:15:34.205
about softwares and so on and so forth.
311
00:15:34.475 --> 00:15:36.565
They concluded that they wanted to create a startup.
312
00:15:37.385 --> 00:15:40.005
So the company said, okay, you can buy the technology.
313
00:15:40.435 --> 00:15:43.885
They bought the intellectual property for $2,000
314
00:15:43.945 --> 00:15:47.365
and they created a company whose name was Adobe.
315
00:15:48.075 --> 00:15:49.685
They developed Photoshop.
316
00:15:50.375 --> 00:15:55.165
Adobe is worse on the capital market there, $190 billion.
317
00:15:56.225 --> 00:15:57.805
The market capitalization
318
00:15:57.825 --> 00:16:01.925
of Xerox is less than a billion dollars end of the story.
319
00:16:02.235 --> 00:16:05.325
Unfortunately, April, 2023,
320
00:16:05.975 --> 00:16:09.725
Xerox eventually donates the Palo Alto research
321
00:16:09.725 --> 00:16:14.005
after what is left from to the Stanford Research Institute,
322
00:16:14.425 --> 00:16:15.685
the neighbor next door.
323
00:16:15.905 --> 00:16:17.005
Now, what is the evolution
324
00:16:17.005 --> 00:16:19.245
of the market valuation of the company?
325
00:16:19.785 --> 00:16:21.765
If you look at the long term, you understand
326
00:16:21.765 --> 00:16:25.045
that the company had a value which was quite stable
327
00:16:25.385 --> 00:16:27.365
and then it started skyrocketing.
328
00:16:28.245 --> 00:16:30.805
I mean more or less because of the success of the company
329
00:16:31.185 --> 00:16:34.285
and also because of the internet bubble at the maximum,
330
00:16:34.945 --> 00:16:39.885
the sales price got to the point of $166 per share.
331
00:16:40.495 --> 00:16:45.205
Today when I record this movie, it's $6.60 per share.
332
00:16:45.665 --> 00:16:46.725
The value of equity,
333
00:16:46.785 --> 00:16:50.405
the market capitalization is less than 1,000,000,800
334
00:16:50.505 --> 00:16:51.805
and $30 million.
335
00:16:52.145 --> 00:16:54.965
The enterprise value, which is market capital debt,
336
00:16:55.465 --> 00:16:59.685
is a bit more than $4 billion, which basically means
337
00:16:59.685 --> 00:17:02.525
that in the company there's a lot of debt,
338
00:17:03.255 --> 00:17:05.965
which is a problem we'll discuss a little bit later on.
339
00:17:06.155 --> 00:17:09.365
What about the stock market credibility price
340
00:17:09.385 --> 00:17:12.965
to book market value for equity divided by book equity
341
00:17:13.515 --> 00:17:16.325
zero point 77, which means that for each
342
00:17:16.325 --> 00:17:19.805
and every dollar invested by shareholders in the equity,
343
00:17:20.225 --> 00:17:22.085
the value is 77 cents.
344
00:17:23.185 --> 00:17:25.365
It is about value, distraction, and value.
345
00:17:25.645 --> 00:17:28.085
Distraction is absolutely consistent with the fact
346
00:17:28.085 --> 00:17:30.805
that the company is not performing at all.
347
00:17:31.065 --> 00:17:32.605
If you take a shorter perspective,
348
00:17:32.665 --> 00:17:33.845
and if you look at what happened
349
00:17:33.845 --> 00:17:37.645
to the stock price the last year, the NASDAQ went up
350
00:17:37.905 --> 00:17:39.565
by 17%
351
00:17:40.185 --> 00:17:44.805
and stock price of Xerox went down by 64%.
352
00:17:45.105 --> 00:17:47.725
Now let's have a look at the financial developments over the
353
00:17:47.725 --> 00:17:51.765
last years, 20 18, 20, 24, 7 years.
354
00:17:52.095 --> 00:17:56.085
First, sales are declining, declining a little bit,
355
00:17:56.085 --> 00:17:58.925
declining a little bit more because the sell of business
356
00:17:59.265 --> 00:18:01.765
and then stabilizing and then declining.
357
00:18:02.545 --> 00:18:05.525
So basically the sales figure, which was about 10 billion,
358
00:18:06.185 --> 00:18:08.205
is now about 6 billion.
359
00:18:08.545 --> 00:18:10.885
So no good news as far as sales are concerned.
360
00:18:11.715 --> 00:18:13.445
What about the revenues by segment?
361
00:18:13.705 --> 00:18:16.525
The company is in fact involving three segments.
362
00:18:16.945 --> 00:18:19.085
You sell services, you sell product,
363
00:18:19.585 --> 00:18:21.285
and there's some sales financing.
364
00:18:21.345 --> 00:18:22.925
You remember the leasing activity.
365
00:18:23.585 --> 00:18:26.925
The leasing activity is absolutely marginal.
366
00:18:26.975 --> 00:18:29.725
Today, what is dominant is services,
367
00:18:29.975 --> 00:18:33.045
which is reasonably stable as a business
368
00:18:33.825 --> 00:18:37.285
and equipment, which is stable in terms of uh,
369
00:18:37.855 --> 00:18:39.365
percentage to revenues.
370
00:18:39.625 --> 00:18:40.805
But at the end of the day, you have
371
00:18:40.805 --> 00:18:43.565
to start the sales process again, each
372
00:18:43.585 --> 00:18:46.245
and every year service, it's more about contract,
373
00:18:46.355 --> 00:18:47.685
it's more about visibility.
374
00:18:49.545 --> 00:18:53.005
The problem is the gross margin. The gross margin is down.
375
00:18:53.065 --> 00:18:56.325
The gross margin is sales, minus cost of sales
376
00:18:56.745 --> 00:18:59.405
as a percentage to revenues, and it's down.
377
00:18:59.435 --> 00:19:03.165
It's down for the three segments, not at the same time.
378
00:19:03.435 --> 00:19:05.885
Financing went down quite recently
379
00:19:05.885 --> 00:19:08.485
because probably of the evolution of the interest rates,
380
00:19:08.665 --> 00:19:11.285
but basically it's declining year after year
381
00:19:11.305 --> 00:19:14.445
and the company lost about 10% in gross margin.
382
00:19:14.905 --> 00:19:17.365
Now, if you observe all the cost, you have the cost
383
00:19:17.365 --> 00:19:19.645
of sales, which is up by 10%.
384
00:19:19.935 --> 00:19:22.205
Gross margin is down by 10%.
385
00:19:23.245 --> 00:19:24.765
SGNA sales general
386
00:19:24.945 --> 00:19:28.885
and have been quite stable throughout the years and research
387
00:19:28.905 --> 00:19:31.245
and development, which is not a cost, it's an investment.
388
00:19:31.515 --> 00:19:33.245
Well, it's not very much an investment.
389
00:19:33.715 --> 00:19:36.125
It's quite low, unstable, low.
390
00:19:36.345 --> 00:19:38.845
As a consequence, what happens to the return on sales?
391
00:19:38.915 --> 00:19:43.005
It's about EBIT divided by revenues. It's down.
392
00:19:43.425 --> 00:19:46.725
You take the current ebit when you exclude all the
393
00:19:46.725 --> 00:19:49.405
exceptional items or you take the published ebit.
394
00:19:49.705 --> 00:19:54.005
Return on sales is down year after year indefinitely.
395
00:19:54.055 --> 00:19:56.965
There is a trend. Return on sales can be calculated
396
00:19:57.075 --> 00:20:00.045
with the ebit, which takes into account precision
397
00:20:00.045 --> 00:20:01.045
and monetization.
398
00:20:01.465 --> 00:20:03.805
The question is, if you exclude the precision
399
00:20:03.805 --> 00:20:05.285
or monetization, what happens?
400
00:20:05.505 --> 00:20:07.605
The return on sales, now it's a bid DA.
401
00:20:07.985 --> 00:20:11.565
If you take a bid, DA divided by revenues, it's declining.
402
00:20:11.915 --> 00:20:15.005
It's declining from 14%, 8%.
403
00:20:15.425 --> 00:20:19.685
So in seven years a company lost six points,
404
00:20:20.105 --> 00:20:23.805
6% of EBDA as a percentage to revenues.
405
00:20:24.375 --> 00:20:27.365
CapEx is not a very significant figure in the company
406
00:20:27.825 --> 00:20:30.125
and if you take the cash conversion cycle,
407
00:20:30.195 --> 00:20:32.725
basically the working capital requirement in days
408
00:20:32.725 --> 00:20:36.045
of revenues, it's quite stable
409
00:20:36.385 --> 00:20:39.045
and it's about one to two months of revenues.
410
00:20:39.545 --> 00:20:41.405
Um, nothing special about that.
411
00:20:41.705 --> 00:20:44.445
Now, the assets turnover is going to be a little bit up
412
00:20:44.445 --> 00:20:47.685
during the last years, but the return on capital employee is
413
00:20:47.685 --> 00:20:48.725
a return on sales time.
414
00:20:48.725 --> 00:20:49.765
The assets turnover
415
00:20:50.545 --> 00:20:53.525
and definitely the trend of the rose is a trend
416
00:20:53.525 --> 00:20:54.925
of the return on sales.
417
00:20:55.825 --> 00:20:58.165
And so the return capital is going to go down.
418
00:20:58.925 --> 00:21:01.765
A few years ago it was about 10%.
419
00:21:02.255 --> 00:21:06.365
Today it is about 5%, a bit less than 5%
420
00:21:06.945 --> 00:21:08.845
at 10% you hardly pay the wage.
421
00:21:08.845 --> 00:21:11.805
Average cost of capital economic profit is at
422
00:21:11.805 --> 00:21:13.485
breakeven at 5%.
423
00:21:13.505 --> 00:21:17.445
You don't pay the work. So the company is not performing.
424
00:21:17.465 --> 00:21:19.285
The performance of the company is negative,
425
00:21:19.285 --> 00:21:21.005
it's economic profit is negative,
426
00:21:21.385 --> 00:21:23.125
the percentage and dollars.
427
00:21:23.435 --> 00:21:26.645
When you observe a company in way some sales financing
428
00:21:27.005 --> 00:21:29.805
activity, it disturbs a little bit the analysis
429
00:21:29.955 --> 00:21:33.605
because the sales financing productivity is a bit different
430
00:21:33.605 --> 00:21:35.525
from industrial service activity.
431
00:21:35.625 --> 00:21:37.485
So you can calculate a rose, a core,
432
00:21:37.985 --> 00:21:41.445
and a rose a total in the total you have the core business,
433
00:21:41.445 --> 00:21:45.485
which is about selling goods and selling services,
434
00:21:45.905 --> 00:21:49.085
and the rose total incorporates the sales financ activity.
435
00:21:49.475 --> 00:21:54.005
Same trend. So rose core is down also
436
00:21:54.885 --> 00:21:57.325
probably a little bit less, but it's very marginal.
437
00:21:57.505 --> 00:21:59.165
You know that there is a strong correlation
438
00:21:59.165 --> 00:22:02.565
between the performance rose, rose against walk
439
00:22:03.305 --> 00:22:05.645
and the value creation market to book.
440
00:22:05.725 --> 00:22:07.725
I already mentioned that the price to book
441
00:22:07.725 --> 00:22:10.085
of the company was 0.77.
442
00:22:10.985 --> 00:22:14.005
Now, definitely we calculate the market to book, not
443
00:22:14.035 --> 00:22:16.125
with only the market capitalization,
444
00:22:16.185 --> 00:22:19.605
but introducing also the net financial debt in order
445
00:22:19.785 --> 00:22:21.365
to calculate the enterprise value.
446
00:22:21.905 --> 00:22:24.325
So market to book is enterprise value, the value
447
00:22:24.325 --> 00:22:26.245
of your business operations divided by
448
00:22:26.305 --> 00:22:28.045
how much you invested in your business
449
00:22:28.045 --> 00:22:29.605
operations capital employed.
450
00:22:30.315 --> 00:22:32.245
When the market to book is greater than one,
451
00:22:32.245 --> 00:22:34.085
it's about value creation less than one.
452
00:22:34.085 --> 00:22:35.365
It's about value. Distraction
453
00:22:35.905 --> 00:22:40.325
as a predominantly debt is playing a big role in the balance
454
00:22:40.415 --> 00:22:43.205
sheet in the market to book is less than one,
455
00:22:43.225 --> 00:22:46.445
but closer to one that what could be suggested by a price
456
00:22:46.445 --> 00:22:49.085
to book off about 0.77,
457
00:22:49.705 --> 00:22:52.245
but definitely the company is destroying values.
458
00:22:52.255 --> 00:22:55.765
There is a consistency between the rose, which is terrible
459
00:22:56.225 --> 00:22:58.805
and the market to book, which is less than one.
460
00:23:01.465 --> 00:23:04.645
You can also compliment this analysis confronting the market
461
00:23:04.705 --> 00:23:07.085
to book, assuming that there is no growth
462
00:23:07.305 --> 00:23:09.765
and the market to book, which is actually observed.
463
00:23:09.885 --> 00:23:13.485
A capital market market to book no growth is calculated.
464
00:23:13.485 --> 00:23:16.005
Dividing the R attacks by the whack,
465
00:23:16.505 --> 00:23:18.525
you can calculate the rose total,
466
00:23:18.945 --> 00:23:21.645
you can take the rose core At the end
467
00:23:21.645 --> 00:23:22.805
of the day, what do you observe?
468
00:23:22.865 --> 00:23:25.205
You observe that there is a consistency
469
00:23:25.205 --> 00:23:26.605
between these three figures.
470
00:23:27.115 --> 00:23:29.565
There's absolutely no recovery,
471
00:23:30.195 --> 00:23:34.005
potential recovery in the actual market to book as opposed
472
00:23:34.005 --> 00:23:35.565
to the market to book no growth.
473
00:23:36.265 --> 00:23:39.325
So this company is poorly performing
474
00:23:39.865 --> 00:23:44.085
and the market has absolutely no hope about producing a
475
00:23:44.325 --> 00:23:46.045
recovery out of the current situation.
476
00:23:46.305 --> 00:23:47.765
The only figure, which is I,
477
00:23:47.785 --> 00:23:51.085
but that's not a good news, is the leverage is the gearing,
478
00:23:51.105 --> 00:23:52.965
is the financial structure of the campaign.
479
00:23:53.825 --> 00:23:57.605
You remember that the cash conversion cycle is quite stable.
480
00:23:57.865 --> 00:23:59.245
The CapEx is not that big,
481
00:23:59.425 --> 00:24:02.405
but the company made a few acquisitions in the last year in
482
00:24:02.405 --> 00:24:06.045
order to try to find a a way to recover from,
483
00:24:06.825 --> 00:24:08.765
but basically it's paid in cash.
484
00:24:08.765 --> 00:24:12.845
Nobody wants to receive Xerox shares if you observe the
485
00:24:12.845 --> 00:24:13.845
version of the stock price.
486
00:24:14.265 --> 00:24:17.405
So at the end of the day, what happened, the debt to a bid
487
00:24:17.405 --> 00:24:20.285
that went up, the leverage went up to today,
488
00:24:20.285 --> 00:24:23.325
it represents six years of ebitda.
489
00:24:23.945 --> 00:24:26.125
Now you have to be very cautious about that
490
00:24:26.125 --> 00:24:29.645
because in the net debt there is some sales financing debt,
491
00:24:29.645 --> 00:24:31.965
but if you exclude a sales financing debt,
492
00:24:32.265 --> 00:24:34.565
if you exclude the EBITDA generated
493
00:24:34.625 --> 00:24:37.685
by the financing activity, you still get a net debt
494
00:24:37.685 --> 00:24:41.245
to ebitda, which is two point something about 2.3,
495
00:24:41.655 --> 00:24:42.885
which is quite high
496
00:24:43.265 --> 00:24:46.845
for a company whose prospects are not outstanding declining,
497
00:24:46.895 --> 00:24:48.765
gross declining performance.
498
00:24:48.995 --> 00:24:52.045
Wrap up of the financial analysis, revenues are down,
499
00:24:52.945 --> 00:24:55.005
EBITDA is down in percentage,
500
00:24:55.225 --> 00:24:58.365
and of course in DRIs the rose is down,
501
00:24:59.105 --> 00:25:01.165
the financial leverage is up
502
00:25:01.545 --> 00:25:04.205
and the stock market credibility, it's quite poor.
503
00:25:04.785 --> 00:25:06.765
So this capital is definitely in difficulty
504
00:25:07.305 --> 00:25:09.965
and it's very much weakened if you compare
505
00:25:10.115 --> 00:25:11.325
with the glorious times
506
00:25:11.345 --> 00:25:13.725
of the company when the return capital,
507
00:25:14.025 --> 00:25:16.685
the gross margin were absolutely outstanding.
508
00:25:16.985 --> 00:25:20.325
In order to get out of this situation, the company wanted
509
00:25:20.345 --> 00:25:23.125
to grow by acquisition, external growth.
510
00:25:23.625 --> 00:25:28.245
It tried to acquire the printers of HP in 2020
511
00:25:28.545 --> 00:25:32.285
for $31 billion paying in
512
00:25:32.285 --> 00:25:33.885
stocks, paying in cash.
513
00:25:34.625 --> 00:25:38.485
It failed as a consequence of the failure in this deal,
514
00:25:39.185 --> 00:25:42.085
the stock price market cap of Xerox went down
515
00:25:42.585 --> 00:25:45.165
and it was worse at the end 4 billion.
516
00:25:45.735 --> 00:25:48.045
Today it's less than 1 billion.
517
00:25:48.585 --> 00:25:51.525
The server acquisition attempt is Lexmark,
518
00:25:52.225 --> 00:25:56.005
and the moment which is supposedly implemented
519
00:25:56.005 --> 00:26:00.565
during the second half of 2025, its number $30 billion,
520
00:26:00.565 --> 00:26:01.805
which they cannot pay.
521
00:26:02.315 --> 00:26:05.525
It's $1.5 billion paid in cash.
522
00:26:06.065 --> 00:26:09.605
It was announced on the 23rd of December, 2024,
523
00:26:10.495 --> 00:26:11.925
about a couple of months ago.
524
00:26:12.185 --> 00:26:14.365
The beginning of the story of Flex Mark
525
00:26:14.505 --> 00:26:17.405
as an inept company is 1991.
526
00:26:17.945 --> 00:26:21.365
It was formerly the IBM printers division.
527
00:26:22.195 --> 00:26:24.965
It's absolutely not core business spun off
528
00:26:24.975 --> 00:26:26.165
individual company.
529
00:26:26.795 --> 00:26:28.045
Then a few things happened
530
00:26:28.745 --> 00:26:32.045
and in 2016 the company was acquired by a group
531
00:26:32.145 --> 00:26:33.485
of Chinese investors.
532
00:26:34.235 --> 00:26:37.565
They together paid $2.5 billion.
533
00:26:38.755 --> 00:26:40.725
Some are private, one is public.
534
00:26:40.785 --> 00:26:42.725
The name of the public company is nine star.
535
00:26:43.195 --> 00:26:45.605
Nine star is basically in the printer's business
536
00:26:45.785 --> 00:26:48.925
and also in the microchips business, especially
537
00:26:48.945 --> 00:26:50.805
for the internet of things.
538
00:26:50.825 --> 00:26:52.405
The IOT business,
539
00:26:53.265 --> 00:26:55.605
the company is still based in the United States,
540
00:26:55.665 --> 00:26:58.685
but it is listed on the SHE stock market.
541
00:26:59.565 --> 00:27:01.525
I tried to find the annual report,
542
00:27:01.965 --> 00:27:03.005
I found the annual report,
543
00:27:03.025 --> 00:27:04.405
but they are all in Chinese,
544
00:27:04.625 --> 00:27:07.565
so there's not much information you can get out of that.
545
00:27:07.625 --> 00:27:08.925
As far as I'm concerned.
546
00:27:09.175 --> 00:27:11.725
Still the market capitalization is known
547
00:27:11.905 --> 00:27:16.165
and it's $5 billion plus, so it's bigger than the rocks.
548
00:27:16.665 --> 00:27:19.485
The sales figures about 3.5 billion,
549
00:27:19.705 --> 00:27:21.325
so it's smaller than Xerox,
550
00:27:21.865 --> 00:27:24.605
and the price to book is 3.6, which demonstrate
551
00:27:24.605 --> 00:27:26.005
that the credibility of the company
552
00:27:26.545 --> 00:27:28.605
is much bigger than Xerox one.
553
00:27:28.865 --> 00:27:31.805
Now, Lexmark was acquired for $2.5 billion,
554
00:27:31.905 --> 00:27:33.445
but as a group of Chinese investors
555
00:27:34.025 --> 00:27:36.645
and it's now sold for $1.5 billion,
556
00:27:36.705 --> 00:27:38.645
but it's difficult to compare these figures
557
00:27:38.725 --> 00:27:40.645
because it seems that there were a few
558
00:27:40.835 --> 00:27:42.245
divestments in between.
559
00:27:43.145 --> 00:27:44.205
One thing is sure is
560
00:27:44.205 --> 00:27:46.605
that there has been agreements with Xerox.
561
00:27:46.715 --> 00:27:50.445
They know each other starting at least in 2021,
562
00:27:50.665 --> 00:27:54.725
and the contracts are about supplying about sales financing.
563
00:27:55.495 --> 00:27:59.485
Xerox does some sales financing for Lexmark equipments
564
00:27:59.505 --> 00:28:01.445
and so on, so they know each other quite well.
565
00:28:01.745 --> 00:28:04.845
We have some figures about Lexmark in the corporate
566
00:28:04.845 --> 00:28:08.765
financial communication of Xerox announcing the deal.
567
00:28:09.025 --> 00:28:11.485
You don't find any information on a nice
568
00:28:11.485 --> 00:28:12.685
stock corporate site.
569
00:28:13.415 --> 00:28:14.965
Where do we read? We read
570
00:28:14.965 --> 00:28:17.965
that Lexmark is much smaller than Xerox.
571
00:28:18.515 --> 00:28:22.125
Lexmark itself is ING revenues, which is one third
572
00:28:22.305 --> 00:28:25.765
of Xerox six point something, two point something
573
00:28:25.905 --> 00:28:28.405
for Lexmark, and the return says
574
00:28:28.405 --> 00:28:29.685
competi is the other way around.
575
00:28:30.075 --> 00:28:33.685
Ebit overseas operating can divided by sales is
576
00:28:34.515 --> 00:28:36.765
nine point something for next Mark
577
00:28:36.905 --> 00:28:41.365
and 4.6, 4.9 depending on how you calculate it for Xerox.
578
00:28:41.745 --> 00:28:43.685
So return says it's twice as March
579
00:28:44.105 --> 00:28:46.805
and revenues are divided by three.
580
00:28:47.145 --> 00:28:49.285
Now, when you make the announcement of an acquisition,
581
00:28:49.465 --> 00:28:51.965
you have to demonstrate that you pay the right price
582
00:28:52.745 --> 00:28:55.765
and it is demonstrated through synergies.
583
00:28:55.865 --> 00:28:57.285
You are going to reduce costs.
584
00:28:57.745 --> 00:28:59.805
So they give a list of synergies.
585
00:28:59.805 --> 00:29:03.085
They are going to reduce the cost by $200 million.
586
00:29:03.715 --> 00:29:05.045
It's quite good news by the way,
587
00:29:05.045 --> 00:29:09.125
because 200 millions of cost reduction is additional profit
588
00:29:09.305 --> 00:29:13.365
of the same amount, minus some taxes multiplied
589
00:29:13.425 --> 00:29:16.525
by the adequate price earning multiple or whatsoever.
590
00:29:17.105 --> 00:29:19.005
You understand that the price
591
00:29:19.065 --> 00:29:23.125
of $1.5 billion is significantly justified
592
00:29:23.265 --> 00:29:24.525
by the cost reductions.
593
00:29:25.375 --> 00:29:28.365
Other synergies, commercial synergies, oh,
594
00:29:28.385 --> 00:29:31.525
we are very complimentary, but they don't give any figure.
595
00:29:31.665 --> 00:29:34.525
The only figure which they give is about the cost savings.
596
00:29:35.665 --> 00:29:38.405
The other figure which they give is about the evolution
597
00:29:38.405 --> 00:29:39.765
of their leverage
598
00:29:40.355 --> 00:29:44.205
because the balance sheet of Lexmark is quite strong
599
00:29:45.105 --> 00:29:49.605
and as a company is generating some ebit, DA, it's going
600
00:29:49.605 --> 00:29:52.485
to complement to the existing EBITDA of Xerox,
601
00:29:52.545 --> 00:29:56.085
and at the end of the day, the net debt divided by ebitda,
602
00:29:56.745 --> 00:29:59.325
pro forma consolidated, it's going
603
00:29:59.685 --> 00:30:01.805
to be merged down compared to the six,
604
00:30:02.545 --> 00:30:05.365
and then to complete the argument saying that you are going
605
00:30:05.365 --> 00:30:06.885
to generate free cash flows
606
00:30:06.885 --> 00:30:08.965
and the free cash flow is going to be used in order
607
00:30:09.065 --> 00:30:10.085
to reduce a debt.
608
00:30:10.665 --> 00:30:13.205
So you now that in the future the gearing,
609
00:30:13.265 --> 00:30:15.685
the leverage is going to be further down.
610
00:30:16.515 --> 00:30:17.845
This is quite good news
611
00:30:17.845 --> 00:30:20.565
because definitely the current situation as far
612
00:30:20.565 --> 00:30:22.365
as the financial structure is concerned
613
00:30:22.745 --> 00:30:24.845
of Xerox is a bit risky.
614
00:30:27.545 --> 00:30:30.605
Now the rationality is economies of scale,
615
00:30:31.325 --> 00:30:34.685
quantified 200 million commercial complementarities,
616
00:30:35.225 --> 00:30:37.485
not quantified, or we are going
617
00:30:37.485 --> 00:30:41.245
to complement the business in emerging growth, et cetera.
618
00:30:41.905 --> 00:30:46.605
No figure better lower net to EBIT DA ratio.
619
00:30:46.905 --> 00:30:48.525
That's definitely one
620
00:30:48.525 --> 00:30:51.205
of the strong rationalities of this deal.
621
00:30:51.545 --> 00:30:53.285
Now, unfortunately for Xerox,
622
00:30:53.285 --> 00:30:56.365
this was announced on the 27 December, 2024.
623
00:30:57.305 --> 00:31:00.765
Now the company announced its 2024 results
624
00:31:01.345 --> 00:31:03.565
in January the 28th of January,
625
00:31:04.185 --> 00:31:07.565
and the cabinet says revenues are down by 10%.
626
00:31:08.145 --> 00:31:12.205
The operating margin is down from 5.6 to 4.9.
627
00:31:12.745 --> 00:31:16.485
The free cash flow is down by almost 30%.
628
00:31:16.825 --> 00:31:19.565
We have to divide the dividend by two.
629
00:31:20.705 --> 00:31:23.565
And last but not least, KA announces
630
00:31:23.565 --> 00:31:26.525
that there are $600 million
631
00:31:26.785 --> 00:31:31.645
of financial debt maturing in 2025 this year.
632
00:31:32.185 --> 00:31:34.445
So the liquidity risk is quite high
633
00:31:34.705 --> 00:31:36.205
and the company says we are going
634
00:31:36.205 --> 00:31:39.605
to restructure the debt most before the maturity, et cetera.
635
00:31:40.195 --> 00:31:42.925
Okay, is it wishful thinking? I don't know.
636
00:31:43.425 --> 00:31:44.725
The consequence is what,
637
00:31:45.115 --> 00:31:47.965
when the company is announcing its performance,
638
00:31:48.305 --> 00:31:49.525
the stock price is down.
639
00:31:49.905 --> 00:31:51.965
Now, what is a conse stock price?
640
00:31:52.065 --> 00:31:54.405
If you look at the last month, you understand
641
00:31:54.405 --> 00:31:57.485
that the company is announcing its performance
642
00:31:57.705 --> 00:32:00.605
and the stock price is down, then it's going to stabilize.
643
00:32:01.115 --> 00:32:02.605
Then the NASDAQ is down
644
00:32:03.145 --> 00:32:06.645
and Xerox is going to amplify the drop in the nasdaq.
645
00:32:07.345 --> 00:32:10.965
So if you look at the last month, NASDAQ is down by 4%.
646
00:32:11.415 --> 00:32:14.045
Xerox is down by 22.4%.
647
00:32:14.905 --> 00:32:16.885
So the credibility of the company is
648
00:32:17.445 --> 00:32:18.525
absolutely at its minimum.
649
00:32:19.195 --> 00:32:20.965
They announced plenty of things.
650
00:32:21.355 --> 00:32:25.325
This is going to be a great deal, maybe hopefully for them,
651
00:32:25.545 --> 00:32:29.085
but now everything has to be demonstrated
652
00:32:29.385 --> 00:32:33.045
and it is absolutely not the case today, unfortunately,
653
00:32:33.065 --> 00:32:36.205
for Iraq, whose history was so bright.
654
00:32:37.055 --> 00:32:37.845
Thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to this educational film which is devoted to the merger of Xerox and Lexmark in the printing industry.
I'm not going to elaborate too much about the deal itself.
I'm going to insist very much on the management of technological innovation, inventions innovation and all the missed opportunities at Xerox in the first years of its existence, there are very well known statements made by Xerox and missed opportunity.
Could have owned the entire computer industry.
It could have been the IBM of the nineties and Microsoft the nineties and at the end of the day who said that very well known person whose name is Steve Jobs in 1995, Steve Jobs is interviewed at that time, his normal at Apple are not yet at Apple.
Again, he is a manager and owner of next, which is going to produce the OSX.
He holds 51% of Pixar.
Pixar is going to produce Toy Story in 95, which is going to be the beginning of a stratospheric career of Pixar, leading eventually to the sale to Disney for seven point some billion.
So Steve Jobs is interviewed, it's going to be named the lost interview.
Why? Because it's been lost and during about 20 years nobody knows where exactly the video he is.
We have some extracts of the podcast and that's it.
It was found again and it's available and it is a mind blowing course in technological innovation.
Now, Steve Jobs is going to explain the reasons of the failure of Xerox.
He says, well, if you look at companies Jerry speaking at X, you have a success and the success comes from an innovative product.
Ts is an innovative product.
You create a monopole because you are far beyond everybody because you are protected your business with a portfolio of patents, protection and so on and so forth.
So this is the beginning of the story and then you keep on with the pursuit of this story and it's about improving the product.
It's about maximizing sales.
So who is in charge of the success? Next step, marketing and sales.
So the marketing and sales team is going to be the source of success is why this guys going to be promoted in the company and they're going to be the senior management of the company.
The company is led by the sales and marketing team.
Now what about products? Product is outside their concerns and for a number of reasons, including time horizon when you're in charge of sales and marketing, your objective is next week, next month, next quarter, next year when you're in charge of product development, your time horizon about years, maybe 10 years if it is a disruptive innovation.
So you understand that the product teams are absolutely not listened to by the sales and marketing people.
It's a very traditional dilemma between exploration product and exploitation, sales and marketing.
At the end of the day, if you look at the story of Xerox at the beginning of the story, a gentleman whose name is Chester Carson, not invented, but one of the very first pioneers of electro photography, which is going to replace a chemical photography whose icon is obviously Eastman Co Eastman Coac is producing Copers, but they are all working operating based on the technology which is about chemical photography.
Then you can copy a little bit, you get something which is not exactly dry, you have to dry it, and what zero is about, it's about dry copying concept is going to first propose the patterns and the innovation to the company, which is living next door.
Whose name is Isman? AK Rochester, New York because he lived there, right? And Kodak is going to refuse, reject this innovation.
Why? Because all the researchers are in organic chemicals.
They have been trained to do so they know this technology and there's a guy who is saying, your technology is outdated.
I have something which is brand new and which is going to completely change your business.
They're rejected.
It's a very famous syndrome not invented here.
International business machines is also going to reject innovation and ironically later on Kodak and IBM are going to produce photocopiers, but they both miss the opportunity of taking the patent in the first years.
Now, who accepted this technology, A small company based in Rochester, New York whose name is Helo Company.
They are in the photographic equipment and so on, so forth.
And so the CEO is going to say this is a great invention.
So he bought the patent, he started producing equipment.
Cop initially transformed the name from Halo to Halo, Xerox and it became Xerox first base in Rochester, New York.
Then moved to Stanford, Connecticut.
Now after the innovation, you have the product.
The first product is named Xerox nine 14.
It was produced and sold in 1959 and if you see on the picture, it's a very big stuff whose design is a little bit approximate.
What are the features of this first photocopier first is very big.
It's heavy more than 300 kilograms, so it's not the kind of thing you can move easily and it's very expensive, $400,000 as people private business and companies cannot pay this amount upfront.
It's going to be leased by Xerox, so their rental business is going to start on lease.
Activ is going to be a very significant profit generator in the company at the very beginning.
Technically the copier produces seven copies per minute, which is absolutely not big, but it's fast growing and it's going to be dozens per minute quite quickly.
Now the competitors are the classic traditional copiers, east man Coda, which are much less expensive, 300 to $400, but they're producing one to two copies per minute and then you have to wait for the moment, it's dry before you can use it.
Now the technology is not completely mature as far as the nine 14 is concerned because when there's a paper jam inside the equipment, sometimes the equipment catches fire.
This is why you need to put a cavity for the fire extinguisher.
There's a paper jam, it catches fire and and you use the extinguisher a little bit later on.
This feature disappeared from the functioning of the equipment and the commercial point of view.
It's an outstanding success.
The first machine is sold in 1959.
In 1961, the revenues generated by sales are about $60 million in 65, more than $500 million and the company is going to start going at the speed of flight.
It's going to adv or it become the Fifteenth's largest company in the United States.
Outstanding success as a consequence of being in the monopoly, the company is generating considerable margins and then the question is, where do you invest your margin? Or you can pay dividend, of course you can buy back your shares.
Of course you can reinvent the corporation product renewal and this is what they're going to try to do.
In 1969, the regime and in 1970 they opened the pillow.
Palo Alto Research Centers a very famous park.
It's based in Palo Alto in California and it's going to welcome a few researchers.
First a few dozens, then 100, 150.
It's never going to be a army of researchers.
Not too many people maximum 400 researchers, but these are geniuses.
You put a few geniuses in the world, you give them freedom.
You say, Hey guys, develop the office of the future.
They are going to be extremely successful in a technology called point of view and they're going to produce dozens of Brexit innovations, which are still extremely valid and used in our daily life today.
Among the inventions Alto, the first personal computer which was developed in 1973, you remember that Apple one was produced by Steve Jobs and Steve Nia in 76, 77, they developed a graphical user interface, mind blowing innovation.
Another innovation is with a wig.
What you see is what you get, okay? You want to print something you see on the screen and what you see on the screen is going to be reproduced on the paper, which is definitely a plus.
Now they notice that the alto computers were not that powerful.
In order to transform that into a more powerful pc, you link them, you link them with a network and the network going to be ethernet and they are going to develop at the part the seven layers of ethernet.
Now you want to print but you don't need a printer per machine.
You want to share the printer.
It's going to be on internet.
And in addition to that, instead of these all very noisy printers, you replace at by something which is extremely powerful, high quality laser printer, which uses more or less the same technology as a photocopy and also you want to share messages and so on and so forth.
You develop a technology and this technology is going to become Internet park did not develop internet park developed innovation science to which basically 50% of what was needed to develop internet was created.
So there were major contributor, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Now the reputation of the park is absolutely outstanding, so they are going to receive some visits.
Apple is created in 76, 77.
Steve Jobs visit the park in 79 and in the interview I already imagined he's going to mention the fact that he's been fascinated by the graphical user interface.
Of course he's going to say there were plenty of other things to do the shopping, but that was absolutely mind blowing.
He's going to sign a deal with Xox, he's going to pay his Apple shares value.
About $1 million at that time went up later on.
It's going to pay the ability and the right to do a kind of shopping inside the park and he's going to do the shopping and with what he is going to buy, he's going to be able to develop Liza Macintosh and so on so forth.
Sometimes people say that the mouse was invented at the park.
Now it was very much developed at the park, but initially it comes from the Stanford research institutes.
The neighbor next door after Steve Jobs, bill Gates is also going to visit the park and Bill Gates said, well, I took plenty of ideas to develop windows from what I've seen in the park.
Interestingly, later on, Steve Jobs accused Bill Gates of stealing what was in the park, but there was a very interesting and humoristic answer from Bill Gates.
Well, Steve, you know what? We were both the neighbor of a rich Kaepernick's name was the rocks.
When I broke into the house to steal the tv, I understood that you had already stolen the tv, which is exactly what happened.
Steve Jobs did the shopping first and what was left, basically Bill Gates did the additional shopping.
Now the reasons for the fear what has been named by academics, the competency trap, of course it's about exploitation versus exploration.
One competency is very much about sales and market can develop on productivity, et cetera.
The other one is about inventing.
There is a trap, you move into one, you lose the other.
But there are a few additional points which I would like to point out the length of the sales cycle.
I've been privileged to work at Xerox, the finance department at that time in the eighties, and I could observe the fact that it was extremely difficult for the French subsidiary to hire good salespeople because a good salespeople, they were all working in a co business.
In a co business, a sales cycle is a few days, a few weeks for individuals.
For large companies it's a few months, but you know what, you immediately get your bonus on the price of the copay you have sold to the company.
If you want to sell ethernet and the associated equipments, it takes yours.
It's not the same time horizon and which kind of bonus do you get initially a percentage of the ethernet cable you have installed in the building, which is absolutely peanut.
Of course, later on you are going to sell laser printers and so on and so forth, and the policy is going to be very much postponed, which is absolutely not in the mind of the salespeople.
So it was impossible to hire good salespeople at Xerox in France, everywhere else I guess.
And also there was an interesting cultural gap between sales and marketing r and d of course time Horizon and so on and so forth.
But you know what? Sales and marketing head office, Stanford, Connecticut, east Coast Park, Palo Alto, west coast, and these guys, it just could not talk to each other.
I had the privilege to meet some people working at the park and they used to tell me, you know, it's very funny when we observe those sales and marketing people who are dressed like sales and marketing people coming from east coast to to visit us, we are dressed like researchers.
And so at the end of the day, uh, you see people in the research department in the park with a guitar on the shoulder, uh, barefoot because you know shoes, it's not that comfortable.
You are allowed to bring your personal pets in the office.
So you can bring your cat, you can bring your dog, and for a researcher, the pet was a python.
So you want to take a coffee with your colleagues, you leave your python on the chair, no problem about security, nobody's going to get into your office.
You understand the cultural gap, which was absolutely tremendous.
These people could not talk to each other.
So there were visits from outside, but there were also missed opportunities from inside.
Uh, one day a couple of researchers saying they had developed something which was quite interesting about pictures, about softwares and so on and so forth.
They concluded that they wanted to create a startup.
So the company said, okay, you can buy the technology.
They bought the intellectual property for $2,000 and they created a company whose name was Adobe.
They developed Photoshop.
Adobe is worse on the capital market there, $190 billion.
The market capitalization of Xerox is less than a billion dollars end of the story.
Unfortunately, April, 2023, Xerox eventually donates the Palo Alto research after what is left from to the Stanford Research Institute, the neighbor next door.
Now, what is the evolution of the market valuation of the company? If you look at the long term, you understand that the company had a value which was quite stable and then it started skyrocketing.
I mean more or less because of the success of the company and also because of the internet bubble at the maximum, the sales price got to the point of $166 per share.
Today when I record this movie, it's $6.60 per share.
The value of equity, the market capitalization is less than 1,000,000,800 and $30 million.
The enterprise value, which is market capital debt, is a bit more than $4 billion, which basically means that in the company there's a lot of debt, which is a problem we'll discuss a little bit later on.
What about the stock market credibility price to book market value for equity divided by book equity zero point 77, which means that for each and every dollar invested by shareholders in the equity, the value is 77 cents.
It is about value, distraction, and value.
Distraction is absolutely consistent with the fact that the company is not performing at all.
If you take a shorter perspective, and if you look at what happened to the stock price the last year, the NASDAQ went up by 17% and stock price of Xerox went down by 64%.
Now let's have a look at the financial developments over the last years, 20 18, 20, 24, 7 years.
First, sales are declining, declining a little bit, declining a little bit more because the sell of business and then stabilizing and then declining.
So basically the sales figure, which was about 10 billion, is now about 6 billion.
So no good news as far as sales are concerned.
What about the revenues by segment? The company is in fact involving three segments.
You sell services, you sell product, and there's some sales financing.
You remember the leasing activity.
The leasing activity is absolutely marginal.
Today, what is dominant is services, which is reasonably stable as a business and equipment, which is stable in terms of uh, percentage to revenues.
But at the end of the day, you have to start the sales process again, each and every year service, it's more about contract, it's more about visibility.
The problem is the gross margin.
The gross margin is down.
The gross margin is sales, minus cost of sales as a percentage to revenues, and it's down.
It's down for the three segments, not at the same time.
Financing went down quite recently because probably of the evolution of the interest rates, but basically it's declining year after year and the company lost about 10% in gross margin.
Now, if you observe all the cost, you have the cost of sales, which is up by 10%.
Gross margin is down by 10%.
SGNA sales general and have been quite stable throughout the years and research and development, which is not a cost, it's an investment.
Well, it's not very much an investment.
It's quite low, unstable, low.
As a consequence, what happens to the return on sales? It's about EBIT divided by revenues.
It's down.
You take the current ebit when you exclude all the exceptional items or you take the published ebit.
Return on sales is down year after year indefinitely.
There is a trend.
Return on sales can be calculated with the ebit, which takes into account precision and monetization.
The question is, if you exclude the precision or monetization, what happens? The return on sales, now it's a bid DA.
If you take a bid, DA divided by revenues, it's declining.
It's declining from 14%, 8%.
So in seven years a company lost six points, 6% of EBDA as a percentage to revenues.
CapEx is not a very significant figure in the company and if you take the cash conversion cycle, basically the working capital requirement in days of revenues, it's quite stable and it's about one to two months of revenues.
Um, nothing special about that.
Now, the assets turnover is going to be a little bit up during the last years, but the return on capital employee is a return on sales time.
The assets turnover and definitely the trend of the rose is a trend of the return on sales.
And so the return capital is going to go down.
A few years ago it was about 10%.
Today it is about 5%, a bit less than 5% at 10% you hardly pay the wage.
Average cost of capital economic profit is at breakeven at 5%.
You don't pay the work.
So the company is not performing.
The performance of the company is negative, it's economic profit is negative, the percentage and dollars.
When you observe a company in way some sales financing activity, it disturbs a little bit the analysis because the sales financing productivity is a bit different from industrial service activity.
So you can calculate a rose, a core, and a rose a total in the total you have the core business, which is about selling goods and selling services, and the rose total incorporates the sales financ activity.
Same trend.
So rose core is down also probably a little bit less, but it's very marginal.
You know that there is a strong correlation between the performance rose, rose against walk and the value creation market to book.
I already mentioned that the price to book of the company was 0.77.
Now, definitely we calculate the market to book, not with only the market capitalization, but introducing also the net financial debt in order to calculate the enterprise value.
So market to book is enterprise value, the value of your business operations divided by how much you invested in your business operations capital employed.
When the market to book is greater than one, it's about value creation less than one.
It's about value.
Distraction as a predominantly debt is playing a big role in the balance sheet in the market to book is less than one, but closer to one that what could be suggested by a price to book off about 0.77, but definitely the company is destroying values.
There is a consistency between the rose, which is terrible and the market to book, which is less than one.
You can also compliment this analysis confronting the market to book, assuming that there is no growth and the market to book, which is actually observed.
A capital market market to book no growth is calculated.
Dividing the R attacks by the whack, you can calculate the rose total, you can take the rose core At the end of the day, what do you observe? You observe that there is a consistency between these three figures.
There's absolutely no recovery, potential recovery in the actual market to book as opposed to the market to book no growth.
So this company is poorly performing and the market has absolutely no hope about producing a recovery out of the current situation.
The only figure, which is I, but that's not a good news, is the leverage is the gearing, is the financial structure of the campaign.
You remember that the cash conversion cycle is quite stable.
The CapEx is not that big, but the company made a few acquisitions in the last year in order to try to find a a way to recover from, but basically it's paid in cash.
Nobody wants to receive Xerox shares if you observe the version of the stock price.
So at the end of the day, what happened, the debt to a bid that went up, the leverage went up to today, it represents six years of ebitda.
Now you have to be very cautious about that because in the net debt there is some sales financing debt, but if you exclude a sales financing debt, if you exclude the EBITDA generated by the financing activity, you still get a net debt to ebitda, which is two point something about 2.3, which is quite high for a company whose prospects are not outstanding declining, gross declining performance.
Wrap up of the financial analysis, revenues are down, EBITDA is down in percentage, and of course in DRIs the rose is down, the financial leverage is up and the stock market credibility, it's quite poor.
So this capital is definitely in difficulty and it's very much weakened if you compare with the glorious times of the company when the return capital, the gross margin were absolutely outstanding.
In order to get out of this situation, the company wanted to grow by acquisition, external growth.
It tried to acquire the printers of HP in 2020 for $31 billion paying in stocks, paying in cash.
It failed as a consequence of the failure in this deal, the stock price market cap of Xerox went down and it was worse at the end 4 billion.
Today it's less than 1 billion.
The server acquisition attempt is Lexmark, and the moment which is supposedly implemented during the second half of 2025, its number $30 billion, which they cannot pay.
It's $1.5 billion paid in cash.
It was announced on the 23rd of December, 2024, about a couple of months ago.
The beginning of the story of Flex Mark as an inept company is 1991.
It was formerly the IBM printers division.
It's absolutely not core business spun off individual company.
Then a few things happened and in 2016 the company was acquired by a group of Chinese investors.
They together paid $2.5 billion.
Some are private, one is public.
The name of the public company is nine star.
Nine star is basically in the printer's business and also in the microchips business, especially for the internet of things.
The IOT business, the company is still based in the United States, but it is listed on the SHE stock market.
I tried to find the annual report, I found the annual report, but they are all in Chinese, so there's not much information you can get out of that.
As far as I'm concerned.
Still the market capitalization is known and it's $5 billion plus, so it's bigger than the rocks.
The sales figures about 3.5 billion, so it's smaller than Xerox, and the price to book is 3.6, which demonstrate that the credibility of the company is much bigger than Xerox one.
Now, Lexmark was acquired for $2.5 billion, but as a group of Chinese investors and it's now sold for $1.5 billion, but it's difficult to compare these figures because it seems that there were a few divestments in between.
One thing is sure is that there has been agreements with Xerox.
They know each other starting at least in 2021, and the contracts are about supplying about sales financing.
Xerox does some sales financing for Lexmark equipments and so on, so they know each other quite well.
We have some figures about Lexmark in the corporate financial communication of Xerox announcing the deal.
You don't find any information on a nice stock corporate site.
Where do we read? We read that Lexmark is much smaller than Xerox.
Lexmark itself is ING revenues, which is one third of Xerox six point something, two point something for Lexmark, and the return says competi is the other way around.
Ebit overseas operating can divided by sales is nine point something for next Mark and 4.6, 4.9 depending on how you calculate it for Xerox.
So return says it's twice as March and revenues are divided by three.
Now, when you make the announcement of an acquisition, you have to demonstrate that you pay the right price and it is demonstrated through synergies.
You are going to reduce costs.
So they give a list of synergies.
They are going to reduce the cost by $200 million.
It's quite good news by the way, because 200 millions of cost reduction is additional profit of the same amount, minus some taxes multiplied by the adequate price earning multiple or whatsoever.
You understand that the price of $1.5 billion is significantly justified by the cost reductions.
Other synergies, commercial synergies, oh, we are very complimentary, but they don't give any figure.
The only figure which they give is about the cost savings.
The other figure which they give is about the evolution of their leverage because the balance sheet of Lexmark is quite strong and as a company is generating some ebit, DA, it's going to complement to the existing EBITDA of Xerox, and at the end of the day, the net debt divided by ebitda, pro forma consolidated, it's going to be merged down compared to the six, and then to complete the argument saying that you are going to generate free cash flows and the free cash flow is going to be used in order to reduce a debt.
So you now that in the future the gearing, the leverage is going to be further down.
This is quite good news because definitely the current situation as far as the financial structure is concerned of Xerox is a bit risky.
Now the rationality is economies of scale, quantified 200 million commercial complementarities, not quantified, or we are going to complement the business in emerging growth, et cetera.
No figure better lower net to EBIT DA ratio.
That's definitely one of the strong rationalities of this deal.
Now, unfortunately for Xerox, this was announced on the 27 December, 2024.
Now the company announced its 2024 results in January the 28th of January, and the cabinet says revenues are down by 10%.
The operating margin is down from 5.6 to 4.9.
The free cash flow is down by almost 30%.
We have to divide the dividend by two.
And last but not least, KA announces that there are $600 million of financial debt maturing in 2025 this year.
So the liquidity risk is quite high and the company says we are going to restructure the debt most before the maturity, et cetera.
Okay, is it wishful thinking? I don't know.
The consequence is what, when the company is announcing its performance, the stock price is down.
Now, what is a conse stock price? If you look at the last month, you understand that the company is announcing its performance and the stock price is down, then it's going to stabilize.
Then the NASDAQ is down and Xerox is going to amplify the drop in the nasdaq.
So if you look at the last month, NASDAQ is down by 4%.
Xerox is down by 22.4%.
So the credibility of the company is absolutely at its minimum.
They announced plenty of things.
This is going to be a great deal, maybe hopefully for them, but now everything has to be demonstrated and it is absolutely not the case today, unfortunately, for Iraq, whose history was so bright.
Thank you very much.