March 2024 educational film // Snap: Options for phantom growth…
How to enrich founders at the expense of investors
Snapchat promised to be an exceptional revolutionary application. Unfortunately, the founders’ greed, the competition and a distinct lack of vision turned it into a white elephant profitable only for its initiators.
A detailed, documented analysis of a social medium that has faded from view.
WEBVTT
1
00:00:07.505 --> 00:00:10.375
Hello and welcome to this film which is devoted to
2
00:00:10.895 --> 00:00:14.455
Snapchat, a star of the social network world.
3
00:00:15.485 --> 00:00:17.705
The story starts in a very nice way.
4
00:00:17.765 --> 00:00:21.025
The capital is doing extremely well and even bigger.
5
00:00:21.405 --> 00:00:24.385
23 years old at that time is going
6
00:00:24.385 --> 00:00:27.345
to reject Nora coming from Mark Zuckerberg.
7
00:00:28.155 --> 00:00:32.385
Zuckerberg wants to buy the company for $3 billion.
8
00:00:32.565 --> 00:00:37.105
We are in October, 2030. The offer is rejected.
9
00:00:37.805 --> 00:00:39.905
It would have generated a wealth,
10
00:00:40.165 --> 00:00:42.865
an increase in their wealth for even Speaker
11
00:00:43.085 --> 00:00:47.465
and Bobby Murphy, $750 million for each of them
12
00:00:47.655 --> 00:00:51.385
because at that time they owned something like 25% each
13
00:00:51.645 --> 00:00:54.425
of the company and they rejected the offer.
14
00:00:54.605 --> 00:00:56.505
Why? Because they thought that they were going
15
00:00:56.505 --> 00:00:59.105
to do much better by themselves
16
00:00:59.885 --> 00:01:01.785
as Snap was doing very well.
17
00:01:02.625 --> 00:01:04.345
Facebook wanted to defeat them
18
00:01:04.535 --> 00:01:06.865
with a new service PO publication
19
00:01:07.005 --> 00:01:09.345
of ephemeral photo pictures.
20
00:01:09.765 --> 00:01:11.505
It was a fear of Facebook
21
00:01:12.125 --> 00:01:16.025
and it was interestingly a kind of ad
22
00:01:16.045 --> 00:01:19.665
for Snapchat showing the interest in this
23
00:01:19.895 --> 00:01:21.065
very new business.
24
00:01:21.405 --> 00:01:22.985
The target is the teenagers.
25
00:01:23.205 --> 00:01:25.465
The teenagers don't like Facebook anymore
26
00:01:25.765 --> 00:01:29.705
and they are very much attracted by this new social network,
27
00:01:30.645 --> 00:01:33.545
so it's going to be rejected, which is extremely glorious.
28
00:01:33.885 --> 00:01:35.105
It seems that Google
29
00:01:35.445 --> 00:01:39.985
and Tencent also made offers probably around $4 billion,
30
00:01:40.455 --> 00:01:44.825
both rejected by Speer and the co-founder of Bobby Murphy.
31
00:01:45.625 --> 00:01:49.385
Facebook was not unsuccessful with all its acquisitions.
32
00:01:50.085 --> 00:01:54.705
The year before in 2012, the company had quite Instagram
33
00:01:55.405 --> 00:01:59.865
for teenagers and for $1 billion a year later it's going
34
00:01:59.865 --> 00:02:02.385
to be WhatsApp for $16 billion.
35
00:02:02.965 --> 00:02:05.425
So the company wants to make acquisitions
36
00:02:05.655 --> 00:02:07.985
with a strategic intent behind that.
37
00:02:08.605 --> 00:02:12.025
We want to keep the monopoly, we want to keep the control
38
00:02:12.025 --> 00:02:15.105
of the market and what is the financial rationality
39
00:02:15.245 --> 00:02:19.705
behind this strategic intent, recurring financial result?
40
00:02:19.885 --> 00:02:22.105
If we control the business, it's going
41
00:02:22.105 --> 00:02:25.665
to be about recurring cash flow, much less sensitive to
42
00:02:26.265 --> 00:02:28.145
fluctuations in the macro economy.
43
00:02:28.935 --> 00:02:30.945
What does it mean less fluctuations?
44
00:02:31.005 --> 00:02:34.105
It means less risk, less lower beta,
45
00:02:34.255 --> 00:02:37.185
less systematic risk than a reduction in the cost
46
00:02:37.185 --> 00:02:39.265
of capital which discount the cash flows.
47
00:02:39.645 --> 00:02:42.105
You should reduce a discount rate, you increase the value.
48
00:02:42.485 --> 00:02:45.345
So there's a lot of value behind this strategy.
49
00:02:45.835 --> 00:02:48.625
Let's go back to STA at the very beginning.
50
00:02:48.625 --> 00:02:52.585
2011 pbu the first service which
51
00:02:52.585 --> 00:02:53.705
is offered by staff.
52
00:02:54.205 --> 00:02:57.785
In fact, PBU is written in a different way as usual,
53
00:02:58.125 --> 00:03:01.325
and as you know, Phu means games with a baby.
54
00:03:01.655 --> 00:03:05.185
Hello, hide and seek or whatsoever, forget it.
55
00:03:05.185 --> 00:03:08.625
There are three founders, Reggie Brown, Bobby Murphy,
56
00:03:09.015 --> 00:03:11.905
even speaker, even speaker was is still
57
00:03:12.285 --> 00:03:13.465
the chief executive officer.
58
00:03:14.105 --> 00:03:17.905
Reggie Brown is the inventor of the mascot Go face chiller.
59
00:03:18.125 --> 00:03:20.625
He is going to be ousted by the other two
60
00:03:20.965 --> 00:03:23.345
and then there will be a legal battle, which is going
61
00:03:23.345 --> 00:03:26.785
to start and it's going to end in 2014.
62
00:03:27.445 --> 00:03:30.665
Now he has a right to be named a co-founder of Snapchat
63
00:03:30.685 --> 00:03:35.105
and he received $157.5 million out
64
00:03:35.105 --> 00:03:36.665
of this uh, legal battle.
65
00:03:37.205 --> 00:03:41.905
And the last news about Regi Brown are quite disaster.
66
00:03:42.805 --> 00:03:44.865
That's it. What are the products which are
67
00:03:44.865 --> 00:03:46.145
so attractive for teenagers?
68
00:03:46.205 --> 00:03:49.265
The abilities to send instant photos.
69
00:03:49.815 --> 00:03:51.105
There's a kind of cultural
70
00:03:51.365 --> 00:03:54.825
and historical reference to the J of the photography
71
00:03:55.455 --> 00:03:59.305
Eastman Kodak, but what makes a difference between Facebook
72
00:03:59.605 --> 00:04:04.105
and Snaps is the ability to make them quickly disappear.
73
00:04:05.205 --> 00:04:08.505
For some people, they show some pictures on Facebook,
74
00:04:08.505 --> 00:04:10.585
they are not so happy about these pictures
75
00:04:10.885 --> 00:04:12.065
and they want to get rid of them.
76
00:04:12.285 --> 00:04:13.705
That's not so easy.
77
00:04:14.125 --> 00:04:17.385
That's strictly organized in Snapchat,
78
00:04:17.835 --> 00:04:19.145
rapid disappearance,
79
00:04:19.645 --> 00:04:21.705
so it's much more a favorable than Facebook.
80
00:04:21.775 --> 00:04:24.545
Obviously. At the very beginning the picture
81
00:04:25.245 --> 00:04:29.265
was surviving one second, then 10 seconds and 24 hours.
82
00:04:29.315 --> 00:04:30.465
Today you have the ability
83
00:04:31.045 --> 00:04:35.065
to make them sustainable on the system with incident loop,
84
00:04:35.805 --> 00:04:40.025
but the segment which is very much targeted by Snap is
85
00:04:40.545 --> 00:04:44.665
teenagers and young adults, 13 to 35 years old.
86
00:04:45.535 --> 00:04:48.305
Then the new service starts in May, 2012
87
00:04:49.245 --> 00:04:52.625
and at that time 25 pictures are posted
88
00:04:52.925 --> 00:04:57.265
and sent per second in November, the same year it's going
89
00:04:57.265 --> 00:05:00.385
to be 270 pictures per second.
90
00:05:00.525 --> 00:05:02.465
So it's a fantastic success.
91
00:05:03.005 --> 00:05:05.705
The users, they really like the service.
92
00:05:06.205 --> 00:05:07.305
Of course there will be plenty
93
00:05:07.405 --> 00:05:09.705
of evolutions from this period today.
94
00:05:09.705 --> 00:05:13.745
Today and now the company is a social network with
95
00:05:14.515 --> 00:05:18.865
multimedia messaging, app, audio and video calls.
96
00:05:19.245 --> 00:05:22.505
You can send photos, you can send short videos.
97
00:05:22.835 --> 00:05:25.825
There are plenty of features, augmented realities,
98
00:05:25.935 --> 00:05:27.585
very important filters.
99
00:05:28.245 --> 00:05:30.225
Uh, the ability to create stories
100
00:05:30.805 --> 00:05:33.865
and the ability to delete even though it's a little bit
101
00:05:33.865 --> 00:05:38.785
limited by the fact that the user may register, may record
102
00:05:39.055 --> 00:05:40.225
what you sent.
103
00:05:40.805 --> 00:05:42.905
Now, what is a business model for Snapchat?
104
00:05:43.525 --> 00:05:46.895
You understand that you really have an access to a young
105
00:05:47.115 --> 00:05:48.615
and creative segment.
106
00:05:49.115 --> 00:05:51.135
The so-called Generation Z,
107
00:05:52.475 --> 00:05:55.495
the service itself is absolutely free.
108
00:05:55.995 --> 00:05:59.815
You can have additional features investing, paying
109
00:05:59.915 --> 00:06:04.095
for Snapchat plus, and then you pay $4 per month.
110
00:06:04.435 --> 00:06:06.375
If you multiply that by 12 months
111
00:06:06.375 --> 00:06:08.375
and if you multiply that by the number of users
112
00:06:08.915 --> 00:06:12.815
it represents today something like $240 million per year,
113
00:06:13.645 --> 00:06:16.775
it's only 5% of the total revenues of the company.
114
00:06:17.815 --> 00:06:21.335
Advertising represents 95% of revenue.
115
00:06:21.955 --> 00:06:26.375
So it's about ad placement, it's about service snap ads,
116
00:06:26.525 --> 00:06:30.455
it's about augmented reality access to this generation.
117
00:06:31.445 --> 00:06:33.255
Obviously it's our competitors.
118
00:06:33.315 --> 00:06:36.135
The main competitors are Instagram
119
00:06:36.795 --> 00:06:39.975
and TikTok as the services of good quality
120
00:06:40.235 --> 00:06:42.775
and very attractive for these young people.
121
00:06:43.115 --> 00:06:44.415
The number of users is going
122
00:06:44.415 --> 00:06:46.095
to grow at least during the first years.
123
00:06:46.835 --> 00:06:50.305
Three regions, north America, Europe, rest of the world,
124
00:06:50.755 --> 00:06:53.985
north America growth and then maturity.
125
00:06:54.535 --> 00:06:58.785
It's a bit like Facebook, Europe, same story growth
126
00:06:59.125 --> 00:07:00.585
and maturity because a number
127
00:07:00.585 --> 00:07:02.985
of users is limited by the population.
128
00:07:03.645 --> 00:07:05.025
Now what about the rest of the world?
129
00:07:05.025 --> 00:07:06.145
There is no limitation.
130
00:07:06.695 --> 00:07:09.945
It's lower at the very beginning because it started later
131
00:07:10.165 --> 00:07:11.985
and then skyrocketing.
132
00:07:12.335 --> 00:07:15.665
Then you understand that the number of user is growing
133
00:07:15.935 --> 00:07:17.745
because of rest of the world.
134
00:07:18.015 --> 00:07:20.905
It's at maturity for the rest of the story,
135
00:07:20.905 --> 00:07:23.145
which is North America and Europe.
136
00:07:23.725 --> 00:07:26.745
Now what about the total revenues by geographical area?
137
00:07:28.005 --> 00:07:30.585
You observe here something which is absolutely
138
00:07:30.605 --> 00:07:31.745
the same as Facebook.
139
00:07:32.055 --> 00:07:33.905
It's a seasonal business. Why?
140
00:07:33.905 --> 00:07:35.705
Because based on advertising,
141
00:07:36.045 --> 00:07:40.145
so Q4 is structured stronger than Q1,
142
00:07:40.465 --> 00:07:41.545
Q2 and Q3.
143
00:07:41.805 --> 00:07:43.505
You have this seasonality,
144
00:07:44.045 --> 00:07:47.785
but what you observe is definitely same as Facebook.
145
00:07:48.155 --> 00:07:51.705
North America is the leading source of revenues,
146
00:07:53.015 --> 00:07:55.655
skyrocketing and stabilizing,
147
00:07:55.825 --> 00:07:59.535
maybe declining except maybe some kind of bouncing back
148
00:08:00.115 --> 00:08:02.895
at the end of Q4 2023.
149
00:08:03.315 --> 00:08:05.775
But it's not that glorious in North America.
150
00:08:06.005 --> 00:08:09.935
What about rest of the world and what about Europe? Exactly.
151
00:08:10.495 --> 00:08:14.895
Centric parallel evolution seems to stabilize a little bit,
152
00:08:14.995 --> 00:08:17.175
but no worries about that,
153
00:08:17.555 --> 00:08:20.375
but much lower than North America.
154
00:08:20.995 --> 00:08:23.655
Now if you divide the second right by the first one,
155
00:08:23.795 --> 00:08:27.095
you get revenue per user as a very well known
156
00:08:27.675 --> 00:08:29.975
rpu average revenue per user.
157
00:08:30.315 --> 00:08:31.615
And then what do you observe?
158
00:08:32.115 --> 00:08:35.695
You observe the seasonality for each and every region.
159
00:08:35.955 --> 00:08:38.055
Of course it's strong work for North America
160
00:08:38.055 --> 00:08:40.255
because it's easier to observe that on the graph,
161
00:08:40.635 --> 00:08:44.735
but basically the RPU is now stable in North America,
162
00:08:45.345 --> 00:08:49.095
maybe declining except maybe Q4, 20, 23.
163
00:08:49.535 --> 00:08:53.415
A bit up back to growth, but limited growth.
164
00:08:54.005 --> 00:08:57.935
What do you observe for Europe and rest of the world growth
165
00:08:58.315 --> 00:08:59.975
and then maturity for Europe.
166
00:09:01.035 --> 00:09:04.655
But what is really a concern is that as far as rest
167
00:09:04.655 --> 00:09:05.815
of the world is concerned,
168
00:09:05.925 --> 00:09:08.255
it's absolutely not the same case as Facebook.
169
00:09:08.615 --> 00:09:11.255
Facebook is growing in terms of our pure rest of the world.
170
00:09:11.275 --> 00:09:13.695
It is absolutely not the case for snap.
171
00:09:14.395 --> 00:09:17.655
So the growth in rest of the world is not RP,
172
00:09:18.075 --> 00:09:19.135
it is number of users.
173
00:09:19.755 --> 00:09:22.615
So you understand that there is really a problem in terms
174
00:09:22.635 --> 00:09:25.855
of generating more revenues out of each
175
00:09:25.955 --> 00:09:28.295
and every daily active user.
176
00:09:28.635 --> 00:09:29.895
Now as you forget about the quarter
177
00:09:30.195 --> 00:09:32.735
and you observe your on year,
178
00:09:33.475 --> 00:09:35.455
you see the gross in the revenues,
179
00:09:35.455 --> 00:09:39.585
which is absolutely fantastic up to 2021.
180
00:09:40.175 --> 00:09:42.825
Then 2022 shows some beginning
181
00:09:42.825 --> 00:09:45.905
of the plateau in 2023, no gross at all.
182
00:09:46.565 --> 00:09:50.265
So if you look at the growth rate year on year,
183
00:09:50.965 --> 00:09:53.705
it was absolutely stratospheric at the very beginning.
184
00:09:53.815 --> 00:09:56.825
Then it stabilized around the listing of the company
185
00:09:57.685 --> 00:09:59.785
2022, 10%,
186
00:09:59.885 --> 00:10:04.225
20, 23 0% growth it out of the picture.
187
00:10:04.525 --> 00:10:07.825
If you make a quick recap about the revenue model, number
188
00:10:07.965 --> 00:10:12.465
of users, revenue per users maturity in terms of number
189
00:10:12.485 --> 00:10:14.825
of users in North America and Europe.
190
00:10:15.485 --> 00:10:18.025
The only growth comes from the rest of the world.
191
00:10:18.805 --> 00:10:21.425
But if you look at the revenue per users, rest
192
00:10:21.445 --> 00:10:24.705
of the world seems to be at maturity, the IQ stable
193
00:10:24.765 --> 00:10:28.825
for Europe and for rest of the world for North America.
194
00:10:29.685 --> 00:10:33.545
We gross maybe if we are optimistic when we look at the
195
00:10:33.705 --> 00:10:36.185
graph because there was a trend which was downward
196
00:10:36.245 --> 00:10:39.065
and it seems that there is a little bit of kind of recovery,
197
00:10:39.525 --> 00:10:42.745
but if you compare Q4 23 as opposed to 22,
198
00:10:43.445 --> 00:10:47.905
the increase is just by 2.2%, which is very weak.
199
00:10:48.885 --> 00:10:51.705
Now if you are growing your revenues, you have to invest
200
00:10:52.285 --> 00:10:55.105
growth consumes financial resources, you have
201
00:10:55.105 --> 00:10:58.305
to invest in infrastructure, your network, you have
202
00:10:58.305 --> 00:11:00.385
to invest in research and the roadmap and sales
203
00:11:00.385 --> 00:11:02.305
and marketing and so on and so forth.
204
00:11:02.685 --> 00:11:05.945
And if you consume financial resources, you need investors.
205
00:11:06.805 --> 00:11:08.345
So there will be investors up
206
00:11:08.345 --> 00:11:10.145
to the IPO, which is venture capital.
207
00:11:10.415 --> 00:11:11.425
Then will be IPO
208
00:11:11.425 --> 00:11:15.105
and post IPO first you have the founders' contribution,
209
00:11:15.125 --> 00:11:17.985
the early stage series, A, B, C, and so on.
210
00:11:18.095 --> 00:11:22.705
Okay? Now the serious story is going to start with series D
211
00:11:23.235 --> 00:11:25.265
where in December, 2014
212
00:11:25.365 --> 00:11:26.865
and Ider packings is going
213
00:11:26.865 --> 00:11:30.545
to invest almost half a billion dollar by itself
214
00:11:31.205 --> 00:11:33.505
for a premo evaluation of 10 billion.
215
00:11:33.645 --> 00:11:36.865
$10 billion is the premo evaluation, which means the value
216
00:11:36.865 --> 00:11:39.825
of the company before firms are raised.
217
00:11:41.125 --> 00:11:43.105
The primo evaluation is going
218
00:11:43.105 --> 00:11:47.025
to be almost $15 billion just a few months later.
219
00:11:47.445 --> 00:11:52.425
Series E, March, 2015, Alibaba very well known it's going
220
00:11:52.425 --> 00:11:54.485
to provide $200 million.
221
00:11:55.065 --> 00:11:59.725
The premium evaluation is going to be 14.8, so you have 10
222
00:12:00.275 --> 00:12:02.605
plus 0.5 is 10.5.
223
00:12:02.745 --> 00:12:04.365
Now it is 14.8.
224
00:12:04.745 --> 00:12:07.685
So it's an increase of $4 billion of the value
225
00:12:07.685 --> 00:12:11.125
of the company just in a few months, a year
226
00:12:11.305 --> 00:12:15.125
before the listing in May, 2016 series F.
227
00:12:15.265 --> 00:12:18.525
Now 1.8 billion, not one investor
228
00:12:18.525 --> 00:12:21.125
but 18 investors led by Glad Brook
229
00:12:21.865 --> 00:12:25.805
and the primo evaluation of that I is 17.5 billion.
230
00:12:25.825 --> 00:12:27.605
So you understand that it's quite a success.
231
00:12:27.905 --> 00:12:31.725
The companies in the momentum, it's a successful momentum
232
00:12:31.825 --> 00:12:35.245
but the value is growing from one fundraising to the other
233
00:12:36.145 --> 00:12:40.005
and then there is a listing in 2017 at the price,
234
00:12:40.005 --> 00:12:41.925
which is $17 per share.
235
00:12:42.505 --> 00:12:46.525
The stock price go to immediately go up from 17 to $25.
236
00:12:46.865 --> 00:12:48.325
The market value a day,
237
00:12:48.485 --> 00:12:51.445
the capital was listed in $33 billion.
238
00:12:51.545 --> 00:12:54.725
So significantly more than the 17.5.
239
00:12:55.305 --> 00:12:58.125
The capital is going to take the opportunity to raise funds,
240
00:12:58.175 --> 00:12:59.725
$3.4 billion
241
00:13:00.185 --> 00:13:04.085
and Tencent to wanted to get into the capital a few years
242
00:13:04.085 --> 00:13:07.525
before is going to use the open market to buy
243
00:13:08.185 --> 00:13:12.085
146 million shares, $2 billion invested.
244
00:13:12.395 --> 00:13:13.685
It's not money for the company
245
00:13:13.905 --> 00:13:16.725
but it is buy shares from the open market so
246
00:13:16.725 --> 00:13:19.805
that Tencent has a role, plays a role in the company.
247
00:13:20.305 --> 00:13:24.555
The rest is going to be a bit less glorious, 17
248
00:13:24.615 --> 00:13:28.875
to 25 and then down and then collapse.
249
00:13:29.645 --> 00:13:32.595
There will be a kind of recovery of the stock price
250
00:13:32.735 --> 00:13:36.955
for some reasons, which are epidemic reasons I would say.
251
00:13:37.015 --> 00:13:39.795
But then the stock price is going to go skyrocketing
252
00:13:40.635 --> 00:13:44.195
collapse again and today it's definitely $12
253
00:13:44.375 --> 00:13:48.915
and it does move very much if you compare SNAP with nasdaq,
254
00:13:49.305 --> 00:13:53.035
what you observe is that NASDAQ went up again and again.
255
00:13:53.735 --> 00:13:56.115
In the meantime, snap was down the lowest
256
00:13:56.855 --> 00:13:58.675
was about $5 per share.
257
00:13:59.405 --> 00:14:02.295
Then thanks too. Quotes covid.
258
00:14:03.025 --> 00:14:05.255
There will be an increase stock price
259
00:14:05.255 --> 00:14:08.775
because at that time all the stock prices
260
00:14:09.155 --> 00:14:12.095
of these companies which are providing services which you
261
00:14:12.095 --> 00:14:13.895
can use without leaving your home,
262
00:14:14.795 --> 00:14:18.615
the stock prices are going to go un reach the sky, zoom,
263
00:14:19.135 --> 00:14:20.135
Facebook or whatsoever.
264
00:14:20.595 --> 00:14:23.655
We all know that. Then the stock price of SNAP is going
265
00:14:23.655 --> 00:14:25.455
to reach $80 per year.
266
00:14:25.805 --> 00:14:30.295
It's going to collapse again, it's 12 up 12.
267
00:14:31.075 --> 00:14:35.415
The company is quite opportunistic in terms of stock prices
268
00:14:35.795 --> 00:14:37.215
and and and fundraising.
269
00:14:38.075 --> 00:14:41.695
The prices are rising because of COVID-19.
270
00:14:42.425 --> 00:14:43.775
Let's take the opportunity
271
00:14:43.885 --> 00:14:46.415
because the stock price is up to sell shares.
272
00:14:46.435 --> 00:14:48.775
Uh, if we sell shares they will be delution
273
00:14:49.155 --> 00:14:51.445
and we don't want to lose the control of the company.
274
00:14:51.585 --> 00:14:54.925
So what do we do? We sell convertible bonds.
275
00:14:55.205 --> 00:14:58.165
A convertible bond is a bond which is going to be tomorrow
276
00:14:59.025 --> 00:15:02.085
if everything goes right, converted into shares.
277
00:15:02.345 --> 00:15:04.285
So basically you get the money now
278
00:15:04.905 --> 00:15:07.925
and the investors, they have the option to convert
279
00:15:08.225 --> 00:15:11.125
as they hold an options, they have to pay for it.
280
00:15:11.185 --> 00:15:12.245
How do they pay for it?
281
00:15:12.435 --> 00:15:14.085
They receive a coupon on interest,
282
00:15:14.085 --> 00:15:16.845
which is less than the coupon of a straight bottle.
283
00:15:17.785 --> 00:15:19.315
Basically the day you do that,
284
00:15:19.335 --> 00:15:22.075
you are strengthening your cash situation.
285
00:15:22.615 --> 00:15:24.035
You're reducing your cost of that
286
00:15:24.035 --> 00:15:26.395
because the coupon is lower and you're delaying
287
00:15:26.395 --> 00:15:29.475
and reducing dilution because dilution is cost postponed.
288
00:15:29.705 --> 00:15:31.715
Convertible bond is absolutely perfect.
289
00:15:32.325 --> 00:15:35.195
There will be three main issues in 2020.
290
00:15:35.415 --> 00:15:40.075
The company is raising $1 billion coupon point 25%.
291
00:15:40.075 --> 00:15:42.355
Of course the interest rates are quite low at that time,
292
00:15:42.375 --> 00:15:44.035
but it is significantly less than
293
00:15:44.035 --> 00:15:46.875
what the company should pay for a straight debt.
294
00:15:47.735 --> 00:15:50.235
The exercise price, the exercise price is the price
295
00:15:50.235 --> 00:15:51.675
as the stock price should reach.
296
00:15:52.415 --> 00:15:57.275
So conversion is more attractive than getting cash back at
297
00:15:57.275 --> 00:15:58.955
the end at the maturity of the bond.
298
00:15:59.105 --> 00:16:00.475
This is a bit technical stuff,
299
00:16:00.475 --> 00:16:03.475
but basically it means that the convertible bond will be
300
00:16:03.475 --> 00:16:07.955
converted if the stock price exceeds $21.70
301
00:16:08.255 --> 00:16:09.315
for the first book.
302
00:16:10.015 --> 00:16:12.115
At that time the stock price is $18.
303
00:16:12.255 --> 00:16:16.115
So 21.7 is just 21% more than
304
00:16:16.115 --> 00:16:19.595
80 20, 21, the stock price is 62.
305
00:16:20.175 --> 00:16:24.155
The company is raising one point 15 billion, zero coupon,
306
00:16:24.415 --> 00:16:28.955
no interest at all, and the exercise price is 89.
307
00:16:29.495 --> 00:16:32.195
So the stock price should be more than 89 so
308
00:16:32.195 --> 00:16:33.755
that the conversion is exercised
309
00:16:34.095 --> 00:16:37.795
and 89 is 44% more than 62.
310
00:16:37.825 --> 00:16:39.315
It's quite aggressive issue.
311
00:16:40.305 --> 00:16:45.035
Same aggressive issue in 20 22, 1 $0.5 billion
312
00:16:45.295 --> 00:16:47.035
At that time the stock price is down
313
00:16:47.175 --> 00:16:49.155
but it's still $40 per share.
314
00:16:49.775 --> 00:16:50.515
The point is
315
00:16:50.515 --> 00:16:54.955
0.125%, very close to zero.
316
00:16:55.335 --> 00:17:00.035
The exercise price is 56. 56 is 40% more than $40.
317
00:17:00.815 --> 00:17:03.235
But you understand that today the stock price is
318
00:17:03.235 --> 00:17:04.755
$12 per share.
319
00:17:05.285 --> 00:17:07.315
There is no conversion so far
320
00:17:08.255 --> 00:17:10.915
and there will be probably no conversion at all.
321
00:17:11.455 --> 00:17:13.835
Now why is the stock price so gloomy those days?
322
00:17:13.835 --> 00:17:17.435
Because the financial metrics are absolutely not positive.
323
00:17:18.215 --> 00:17:21.475
You remember that value comes from financial performance
324
00:17:21.495 --> 00:17:24.315
and financial performance is return capital.
325
00:17:24.825 --> 00:17:26.315
Your return capital should be
326
00:17:26.315 --> 00:17:27.475
greater than the cost of capital.
327
00:17:27.535 --> 00:17:29.835
Return. Capital is how much you earn divided by
328
00:17:29.835 --> 00:17:33.595
how much you invested, how much you earn is very much EBITDA
329
00:17:34.215 --> 00:17:36.835
and how much you invested is very much capital expenditures,
330
00:17:36.835 --> 00:17:39.355
working capital requirement and so on.
331
00:17:39.615 --> 00:17:41.475
So let's have a look at ebitda.
332
00:17:42.415 --> 00:17:45.835
EBITDA is cash, operating revenues minus cash.
333
00:17:45.835 --> 00:17:48.275
Operating expenses, something which looks like cash.
334
00:17:48.825 --> 00:17:51.525
It's nearly cash, it's quite important.
335
00:17:51.785 --> 00:17:54.005
You can calculate the EBITDA directly
336
00:17:54.465 --> 00:17:57.565
or you can calculate indirectly who the operating comes
337
00:17:57.565 --> 00:18:00.365
with the ebit and then you calculate EBITDA
338
00:18:00.985 --> 00:18:04.365
as EBIT plus depreciation, plus amortization,
339
00:18:04.475 --> 00:18:06.685
plus stock based compensation.
340
00:18:07.555 --> 00:18:09.325
Then the weight works. So at the end
341
00:18:09.325 --> 00:18:12.765
of the day you calculate the ebit, you calculate the EBITDA
342
00:18:12.945 --> 00:18:14.125
and you calculate the roof.
343
00:18:14.745 --> 00:18:17.685
You remember that the campaign is growing in terms of sales.
344
00:18:17.755 --> 00:18:21.085
When you grow in sales, you generate economies of scale.
345
00:18:21.555 --> 00:18:22.765
Economies of scale means
346
00:18:22.765 --> 00:18:24.685
that fixed cost per you need are down.
347
00:18:25.065 --> 00:18:27.885
As a consequence, if your costs are down as a percentage
348
00:18:27.905 --> 00:18:31.725
to revenue, your EBIT as a percentage to revenue is up,
349
00:18:32.175 --> 00:18:33.645
which is absolutely mechanical.
350
00:18:34.185 --> 00:18:37.485
So we see the growth which is there in terms of revenues
351
00:18:37.545 --> 00:18:40.605
and the EBIT as a percentage to revenue, which is going up
352
00:18:40.825 --> 00:18:45.045
and it's going to be significantly positive in 2021.
353
00:18:45.825 --> 00:18:48.645
In 2022, abro is slowing down
354
00:18:49.065 --> 00:18:52.805
and as you have to invest in fighting against competition,
355
00:18:52.805 --> 00:18:56.365
which is Instagram and TikTok, EBIT dies down to zero
356
00:18:56.985 --> 00:19:01.165
and in 2023 revenues are stable, EBIT dies zero
357
00:19:01.745 --> 00:19:03.285
as a percentage to revenue.
358
00:19:03.995 --> 00:19:06.605
That was for ebitda. Now let's have a look at ebit.
359
00:19:07.255 --> 00:19:09.545
EBIT is revenues minus operating expenses.
360
00:19:10.545 --> 00:19:12.565
You can observe the same economies of scale.
361
00:19:12.565 --> 00:19:16.045
There is a fair virtual period up to 2021.
362
00:19:17.145 --> 00:19:19.685
All the costs are up in absolute terms,
363
00:19:19.825 --> 00:19:24.205
but relative to revenues, it's down cost of sales, search
364
00:19:24.205 --> 00:19:26.365
and development, sales and marketing general
365
00:19:26.465 --> 00:19:28.765
and then me as a percentage to revenues.
366
00:19:28.765 --> 00:19:30.245
They are all down and then
367
00:19:31.075 --> 00:19:34.685
there's a point from when it starts getting up again.
368
00:19:35.385 --> 00:19:38.925
So in any bit you understand that there is a nice period
369
00:19:39.055 --> 00:19:43.325
where you can observe the potential positive return on sales
370
00:19:43.665 --> 00:19:44.885
and then it's out of the picture
371
00:19:44.885 --> 00:19:48.045
because costs are up as a percentage to revenue.
372
00:19:48.675 --> 00:19:51.125
When you observe and capital difference between EBIT
373
00:19:51.125 --> 00:19:53.725
and ebitda, there is an item which is obvious,
374
00:19:53.725 --> 00:19:55.445
which is depreciation,
375
00:19:55.925 --> 00:19:58.885
amortization, a non-cash item.
376
00:19:58.925 --> 00:20:02.485
There's another non-cash item which is quite interesting
377
00:20:02.485 --> 00:20:04.805
to observe, which is a stock-based compensation.
378
00:20:05.745 --> 00:20:08.525
So you pay a salary to people managers
379
00:20:08.525 --> 00:20:12.325
and for key people you are transforming them from employees
380
00:20:12.325 --> 00:20:15.405
to employees and core investors in the company.
381
00:20:16.185 --> 00:20:18.645
So you give them equities, shares,
382
00:20:19.045 --> 00:20:21.365
restricted stock units which are vested
383
00:20:21.515 --> 00:20:23.885
because of service as time goes on
384
00:20:23.985 --> 00:20:26.165
or when there is an event which is happening
385
00:20:26.425 --> 00:20:28.605
and you give them also stock options,
386
00:20:29.145 --> 00:20:30.845
employ stock options plan
387
00:20:31.465 --> 00:20:34.125
and that's about options on the stock
388
00:20:34.385 --> 00:20:36.645
or absolute shares which are
389
00:20:36.865 --> 00:20:39.125
to be in your pocket year after year.
390
00:20:40.125 --> 00:20:42.485
Interestingly, there's a huge debate about
391
00:20:42.545 --> 00:20:44.925
how you should account for these SC.
392
00:20:45.465 --> 00:20:48.170
Uh, the accounting authorities say it should be accounted
393
00:20:48.170 --> 00:20:49.365
as operating expenses
394
00:20:49.545 --> 00:20:51.365
and should be written off in the p and l.
395
00:20:51.905 --> 00:20:55.685
Um, I am personally absolutely against that opinion
396
00:20:56.145 --> 00:20:59.925
and I published a blog and the academy on this topic.
397
00:21:00.345 --> 00:21:03.605
Uh, when people are investing in a company,
398
00:21:04.555 --> 00:21:07.085
when venture Cap is investing in the company,
399
00:21:07.705 --> 00:21:10.325
you don't treat its investment as an expense.
400
00:21:10.745 --> 00:21:12.205
And so if managers
401
00:21:12.205 --> 00:21:14.525
and key employees are investing in the
402
00:21:14.525 --> 00:21:16.325
company, it's an investment.
403
00:21:16.835 --> 00:21:20.175
It's not a cost should not be opinion. I stop there.
404
00:21:20.435 --> 00:21:23.095
Now, SPC is something which is quite
405
00:21:23.095 --> 00:21:24.615
important in some companies.
406
00:21:25.155 --> 00:21:29.775
If you remember as example of Snowflake, it represents 50%
407
00:21:29.795 --> 00:21:31.015
of the operating charges.
408
00:21:31.955 --> 00:21:33.615
As far as SNAP is concerned,
409
00:21:33.635 --> 00:21:36.895
the figure is $1.3 billion in 2023.
410
00:21:37.245 --> 00:21:39.215
It's not 50, but it's small than 20%
411
00:21:39.215 --> 00:21:42.255
of the operating expenses quite significant.
412
00:21:42.795 --> 00:21:46.495
Now, if you divide this together 1.3 billion by the number
413
00:21:46.515 --> 00:21:49.895
of employed at snap at that time you get upset,
414
00:21:49.895 --> 00:21:54.095
which is about $250,000 per employee.
415
00:21:54.635 --> 00:21:56.815
Of course there are huge differences from one employee
416
00:21:56.815 --> 00:22:00.415
to the other, but it's quite interesting to compare that
417
00:22:00.415 --> 00:22:03.895
and contract it with the media salary Million means
418
00:22:03.895 --> 00:22:06.255
that there are as many people who receive more,
419
00:22:06.355 --> 00:22:07.855
as many people who receive less.
420
00:22:08.325 --> 00:22:12.095
It's $346,000, which is quite high
421
00:22:12.115 --> 00:22:13.575
as a media salary by the way.
422
00:22:13.915 --> 00:22:17.415
And you understand that SBC is a very significant part of
423
00:22:17.415 --> 00:22:20.735
that 250, 350.
424
00:22:21.155 --> 00:22:24.135
Now, if we consider that SBC should not be treated
425
00:22:24.235 --> 00:22:26.615
as an expense, let's calculate the cost
426
00:22:27.285 --> 00:22:31.055
excluding stock based compensation quarter by quarter
427
00:22:31.485 --> 00:22:34.015
what you observe, you observe this virtual phase
428
00:22:34.045 --> 00:22:37.095
with declining costs as a percentage to revenues
429
00:22:37.095 --> 00:22:39.095
and stabilize shallow the Yellowstone so far.
430
00:22:39.515 --> 00:22:42.615
But even though you exclude SBC, what do you observe?
431
00:22:43.075 --> 00:22:46.615
If you make a sum of cost of sales and r and d and sales
432
00:22:46.635 --> 00:22:51.065
and marketing and GA, you get a sum, which is more
433
00:22:51.065 --> 00:22:52.305
or less 100%
434
00:22:52.525 --> 00:22:56.585
or more than 100%, then it's going to be very difficult
435
00:22:57.325 --> 00:22:59.905
to be a positive in terms of p
436
00:22:59.905 --> 00:23:01.745
and l in terms of EBIT and ebitda.
437
00:23:02.005 --> 00:23:05.145
If your costs are exceeding your revenues as far
438
00:23:05.145 --> 00:23:06.385
as the rose sales concerns
439
00:23:06.385 --> 00:23:08.985
and the narrator is EBIT is negative,
440
00:23:09.365 --> 00:23:11.705
but the denominator, the denominator is
441
00:23:11.705 --> 00:23:13.785
how much we invest in your business operations.
442
00:23:14.655 --> 00:23:16.705
It's about fixed and current capital.
443
00:23:16.895 --> 00:23:18.305
It's about capital expenditures
444
00:23:18.645 --> 00:23:20.225
and working capital requirement.
445
00:23:20.475 --> 00:23:23.145
Let's start with the cash conversion cycle.
446
00:23:23.605 --> 00:23:25.865
The operating working capital requirements made
447
00:23:25.865 --> 00:23:29.065
of inventory, but cash receivable bonds, accounts payable.
448
00:23:29.565 --> 00:23:31.785
Of course, in a business like snap, there is no inventory,
449
00:23:32.325 --> 00:23:35.265
not in manufacturing are retail distribution.
450
00:23:35.645 --> 00:23:37.745
So it's about receivables minus payables
451
00:23:37.745 --> 00:23:38.825
and it's quite significant.
452
00:23:39.045 --> 00:23:42.105
The cash conversion cycle is about 80 days of sales
453
00:23:42.125 --> 00:23:45.605
and revenues, but the non-operating working capital
454
00:23:45.605 --> 00:23:48.885
requirement incorporate a few things like CHA fund revenue
455
00:23:50.365 --> 00:23:52.125
advertising agencies are paying up
456
00:23:52.125 --> 00:23:53.285
front and so on and so forth.
457
00:23:53.305 --> 00:23:54.365
So as a consequence,
458
00:23:54.945 --> 00:23:57.765
the actual working capital requirement is less than the
459
00:23:57.765 --> 00:23:58.805
cash conversion cycle.
460
00:23:59.195 --> 00:24:02.645
It's about a most, it's not negligible,
461
00:24:02.825 --> 00:24:06.085
but it's not very high when you create the company.
462
00:24:06.185 --> 00:24:08.165
You have to invest a lot in infrastructure,
463
00:24:08.905 --> 00:24:10.845
IT network and so on and so forth.
464
00:24:11.625 --> 00:24:14.485
So basically in the early years of the company,
465
00:24:15.185 --> 00:24:17.845
the CapEx two revenues ratio is quite high.
466
00:24:17.875 --> 00:24:19.165
Then it's going to go down.
467
00:24:19.675 --> 00:24:23.125
Then it's about maintenance productivity and so on so forth.
468
00:24:23.565 --> 00:24:25.645
A bit up during the last years probably
469
00:24:25.645 --> 00:24:26.925
because you have to improve the quality
470
00:24:26.945 --> 00:24:28.165
of service or whatsoever.
471
00:24:29.215 --> 00:24:32.325
CapEx is not very low, but it's not very high.
472
00:24:32.385 --> 00:24:33.805
The assets turnover is going
473
00:24:33.805 --> 00:24:36.125
to profit from the increase in the revenues.
474
00:24:36.355 --> 00:24:38.565
This is part of the economy's skill by the way,
475
00:24:38.985 --> 00:24:42.805
but that is going to plateau and today it's 1.5.
476
00:24:43.105 --> 00:24:46.405
The 1.5 is not explained by onlay capital expenditure
477
00:24:46.665 --> 00:24:47.965
and cash conversion cycle.
478
00:24:48.035 --> 00:24:51.725
It's also explained by acquisitions, intangible assets,
479
00:24:52.285 --> 00:24:55.325
goodwill, capitalize or the expenses or whatsoever.
480
00:24:56.025 --> 00:25:00.045
So basically the assets turnover is 1.5. What does it mean?
481
00:25:00.625 --> 00:25:03.005
It means that there is some capital
482
00:25:03.355 --> 00:25:05.085
intensity in this business.
483
00:25:05.745 --> 00:25:08.325
The capital intensity comes from infrastructure
484
00:25:08.985 --> 00:25:10.445
and it comes from acquisitions,
485
00:25:11.225 --> 00:25:12.445
but it's quite interesting
486
00:25:12.445 --> 00:25:14.285
to observe the consequence of this figure.
487
00:25:14.985 --> 00:25:17.565
You remember that return capital is return on sales
488
00:25:17.645 --> 00:25:18.925
times assets turnover.
489
00:25:19.355 --> 00:25:22.525
Imagine that for any reason, return on sales turns positive.
490
00:25:22.835 --> 00:25:25.165
It's not going to be very much amplified
491
00:25:25.165 --> 00:25:26.325
by the assets turnover.
492
00:25:26.785 --> 00:25:28.085
If a return on sales turns
493
00:25:28.185 --> 00:25:31.685
to 10% return capital would be 15%,
494
00:25:32.175 --> 00:25:33.245
which is not that much.
495
00:25:33.305 --> 00:25:36.125
So the company is fighting in order
496
00:25:36.305 --> 00:25:39.285
to transform the negative into positive return on sales,
497
00:25:39.705 --> 00:25:43.085
but it's not going to profit from asset light business.
498
00:25:43.475 --> 00:25:45.485
It's quite capital intensive
499
00:25:46.025 --> 00:25:49.565
and return on sales is going to be amplified by only 50%
500
00:25:49.585 --> 00:25:51.725
to create the return on capital report.
501
00:25:52.585 --> 00:25:54.365
That's quite difficult for the future.
502
00:25:54.825 --> 00:25:57.845
Now let's go back to the stock based compensation.
503
00:25:58.615 --> 00:26:00.125
Stock based compensation is
504
00:26:00.325 --> 00:26:03.805
provided in the 10 care report for each and every function.
505
00:26:03.865 --> 00:26:06.805
So you have the amount, stock based compensation for r
506
00:26:06.805 --> 00:26:09.085
and d, for general admin and so on, so forth.
507
00:26:09.385 --> 00:26:13.895
Who is the winner? The winner is r and d because for r
508
00:26:13.895 --> 00:26:17.655
and D stock-based compensations represents 50%
509
00:26:17.675 --> 00:26:18.815
of the r and d costs.
510
00:26:19.315 --> 00:26:22.655
So your developers, your engineers, your et cetera,
511
00:26:23.105 --> 00:26:24.295
developing the service
512
00:26:24.955 --> 00:26:27.775
and developing the features, they receive quite a lot
513
00:26:27.775 --> 00:26:32.055
of shares, restricted stock units and um, stock options.
514
00:26:33.175 --> 00:26:36.155
Second with 20% sales and marketing
515
00:26:37.175 --> 00:26:38.235
and general and admin.
516
00:26:38.235 --> 00:26:41.235
General admin includes the general management, uh,
517
00:26:41.295 --> 00:26:43.645
who receives plenty of uh, this kind of stuff.
518
00:26:44.075 --> 00:26:48.125
Cost of revenues, cost of sales, production, knee
519
00:26:48.385 --> 00:26:51.565
or almost so this remuneration,
520
00:26:51.695 --> 00:26:54.165
which is about the price of the company.
521
00:26:54.385 --> 00:26:56.005
The value of the company is going
522
00:26:56.005 --> 00:26:59.165
to be concentrated in the hands of research and development
523
00:26:59.785 --> 00:27:03.525
and sales and marketing general mean general management.
524
00:27:03.905 --> 00:27:06.525
If you observe, when cost
525
00:27:06.525 --> 00:27:09.445
of sales received some stock based compensation, it was
526
00:27:10.155 --> 00:27:11.525
when the IPO took place
527
00:27:12.225 --> 00:27:16.445
before the IPO, everybody received stock based compensation.
528
00:27:16.945 --> 00:27:19.765
And then what you observe is the number one
529
00:27:20.145 --> 00:27:21.245
is general and admin.
530
00:27:21.385 --> 00:27:23.485
Why? Because it's a general manager.
531
00:27:23.865 --> 00:27:27.445
The CEO is going to receive tons of SBC.
532
00:27:27.745 --> 00:27:30.965
You're never better served than by yourself.
533
00:27:31.755 --> 00:27:34.125
When you receive this kind stock based compensation,
534
00:27:34.465 --> 00:27:37.245
you receive a plan which is going to be vested
535
00:27:37.745 --> 00:27:40.325
as a consequence of service time.
536
00:27:40.905 --> 00:27:44.645
So the shares, the restricted stock units are vested quarter
537
00:27:44.865 --> 00:27:48.925
by quarter or, and it's vested because there is an event.
538
00:27:49.785 --> 00:27:51.645
The IPO is part of the event.
539
00:27:51.705 --> 00:27:54.765
So even bigger received just
540
00:27:54.765 --> 00:27:59.165
before the IPO, plenty of restricted stock units,
541
00:27:59.975 --> 00:28:03.845
which were supposed to be immediately vested by the IPO.
542
00:28:04.545 --> 00:28:09.205
It consists in 37.4 million C shares seven,
543
00:28:09.275 --> 00:28:14.165
4.7 B shares 612 million A shares.
544
00:28:14.355 --> 00:28:18.885
This is a total of 724 million shares which were
545
00:28:18.885 --> 00:28:20.965
immediately vested by the IPO.
546
00:28:20.965 --> 00:28:23.445
The IPO took place at $17.
547
00:28:24.105 --> 00:28:26.925
So you understand the amount of money which is going to be
548
00:28:27.585 --> 00:28:30.645
vested immediately in the pocket of the CEO.
549
00:28:30.935 --> 00:28:33.725
There are three classes of shares.
550
00:28:34.545 --> 00:28:38.325
The A shares are non-voting. So you receive the dividend.
551
00:28:38.325 --> 00:28:39.365
Of course there's no dividend
552
00:28:39.365 --> 00:28:41.885
because there is no profit and that's it.
553
00:28:41.885 --> 00:28:44.885
But you have no voting right in the shareholder meeting
554
00:28:45.605 --> 00:28:48.525
B shares, they have one voting right to share
555
00:28:49.125 --> 00:28:51.605
C shares stand voting right to share.
556
00:28:52.385 --> 00:28:55.405
Now the question is where is the capital located?
557
00:28:55.945 --> 00:28:59.325
Who is the owner of the A versus B versus C shares?
558
00:28:59.985 --> 00:29:02.005
The answer is provided in a 10 care report,
559
00:29:02.005 --> 00:29:03.285
2023 of the capital.
560
00:29:03.835 --> 00:29:06.605
What you can almost read on the extract
561
00:29:06.665 --> 00:29:11.165
of the 10 care report is that 99.5%
562
00:29:11.165 --> 00:29:14.485
of the voting right are concentrated in the hands
563
00:29:14.665 --> 00:29:17.245
of even people and Bobby Murphy.
564
00:29:18.415 --> 00:29:23.205
These guys, they own 100% of the C shares 10 voting rights
565
00:29:23.425 --> 00:29:26.645
and they own 52% of the B shares,
566
00:29:26.865 --> 00:29:28.525
one voting right per share.
567
00:29:28.985 --> 00:29:32.645
So at the end of the day with 52% of the B shares
568
00:29:32.825 --> 00:29:35.125
and all of the C shares,
569
00:29:35.705 --> 00:29:38.445
it represents 21.6% of the capital,
570
00:29:39.025 --> 00:29:42.085
but 99.5% of the voting rights,
571
00:29:42.195 --> 00:29:44.085
they completely control the company.
572
00:29:44.775 --> 00:29:47.125
Their friend Mark Zuckerberg
573
00:29:47.785 --> 00:29:49.445
is almost in the same situation,
574
00:29:49.705 --> 00:29:52.165
is about 13% of the capital.
575
00:29:52.305 --> 00:29:53.645
He sold some shares recently.
576
00:29:54.185 --> 00:29:57.805
Uh, and more than 50% of the voting rights, you are the boss
577
00:29:57.805 --> 00:30:00.805
because you hold the majority of the voting rights.
578
00:30:01.425 --> 00:30:03.605
Of course, a number of shares you hold has
579
00:30:03.605 --> 00:30:04.765
an impact on your wealth.
580
00:30:05.705 --> 00:30:08.845
If you look at the evolution of the net worth of Mr.
581
00:30:09.155 --> 00:30:12.605
Spiegel as it is published by Forbes, the list
582
00:30:12.625 --> 00:30:14.965
of the billionaires, you understand
583
00:30:14.965 --> 00:30:18.485
that there was a peak when the stock price reached something
584
00:30:18.595 --> 00:30:20.365
like $80 per share.
585
00:30:20.945 --> 00:30:23.965
At that time, his net worth was $11 billion.
586
00:30:24.465 --> 00:30:27.725
Uh, it went down, but it is still $3 billion.
587
00:30:28.685 --> 00:30:32.425
So you can maybe compare $3 billion today versus
588
00:30:32.515 --> 00:30:36.265
$750 million 10 years ago invested in
589
00:30:36.265 --> 00:30:37.545
nasdaq, doesn't matter.
590
00:30:37.695 --> 00:30:40.865
With $3 billion, you are reasonably well off
591
00:30:41.365 --> 00:30:45.905
and that what is absolutely important to remember, of course
592
00:30:46.295 --> 00:30:47.625
with a great sense of humor,
593
00:30:47.805 --> 00:30:50.025
the capital is publishing on a 10 K report,
594
00:30:50.245 --> 00:30:53.865
the evolution stock price, and they start in December 18.
595
00:30:54.775 --> 00:30:56.265
When it was at the low point
596
00:30:56.775 --> 00:30:59.505
when the company announced the 2023 result,
597
00:30:59.765 --> 00:31:01.665
the stock price collapsed.
598
00:31:02.205 --> 00:31:03.665
It was very bad news.
599
00:31:03.665 --> 00:31:07.265
Even though the RPU was a bit betterer in North America, as
600
00:31:07.265 --> 00:31:11.225
of course to Q4 2022, it collapsed because there's no growth
601
00:31:11.645 --> 00:31:12.985
and there's no performance.
602
00:31:13.645 --> 00:31:15.665
And so at the end of the day what happened,
603
00:31:16.245 --> 00:31:18.185
NASDAQ was going up smoothly.
604
00:31:19.045 --> 00:31:20.065
It went down.
605
00:31:20.205 --> 00:31:22.345
It went up a little bit when the company
606
00:31:22.485 --> 00:31:25.025
and now that they were buying bags convertible,
607
00:31:25.645 --> 00:31:27.705
of course you can buy bags of convertible
608
00:31:27.705 --> 00:31:28.865
because the probability
609
00:31:28.865 --> 00:31:31.505
of conversion is now absolutely zero.
610
00:31:32.485 --> 00:31:34.225
The coupon is close to zero one.
611
00:31:34.225 --> 00:31:36.185
In the meantime, the HRA rates went up.
612
00:31:36.445 --> 00:31:38.865
So the value of the convertible bonds is down
613
00:31:39.245 --> 00:31:42.425
and then you use your cash to buy back convertible bolts.
614
00:31:43.285 --> 00:31:45.825
Wow, that's a great value creation process.
615
00:31:46.525 --> 00:31:48.585
In the end, if you look at the return investment
616
00:31:48.805 --> 00:31:51.625
for all these investors, the market cap today
617
00:31:52.165 --> 00:31:54.225
is a bit less than $20 billion.
618
00:31:54.725 --> 00:31:59.225
You remember series D, the premo valuation was 10 billion.
619
00:31:59.435 --> 00:32:01.305
Today it's twice as much,
620
00:32:02.125 --> 00:32:04.705
but in the meantime there were other equity issues,
621
00:32:04.705 --> 00:32:06.225
so you've been a bit diluted.
622
00:32:06.225 --> 00:32:09.905
And the meantime, the NASDAQ was multiplied by 2.5
623
00:32:10.565 --> 00:32:14.825
and there is no dilution in Nasda series A, uh,
624
00:32:14.935 --> 00:32:17.265
plus 35% in nine euros.
625
00:32:17.805 --> 00:32:19.225
So it's a positive return,
626
00:32:19.285 --> 00:32:22.065
but it's value destruction, obviously series F
627
00:32:22.575 --> 00:32:24.785
plus 11% in eight euros.
628
00:32:25.155 --> 00:32:26.785
Again, positive return
629
00:32:26.885 --> 00:32:30.345
and value structure does not pay the cost of capital by far
630
00:32:31.145 --> 00:32:35.785
IPO from 17 to 12 minus 30% as a retail university
631
00:32:36.245 --> 00:32:37.585
and the convertible bolts,
632
00:32:37.585 --> 00:32:40.005
they are all non-convertible anymore,
633
00:32:40.305 --> 00:32:41.965
and so the return is negative.
634
00:32:41.965 --> 00:32:44.045
This is why the company can buy them back
635
00:32:44.625 --> 00:32:47.045
at the price which is lower than the price
636
00:32:47.045 --> 00:32:48.125
at which they were issued.
637
00:32:48.545 --> 00:32:50.605
So for the investors, it's a disaster,
638
00:32:51.345 --> 00:32:53.805
but for the founders, it's a success story
639
00:32:54.315 --> 00:32:56.725
because they receive plenty of stocks
640
00:32:56.725 --> 00:32:58.325
and so on and so and so.
641
00:32:58.325 --> 00:33:02.765
At the end of the day, the founders are much more well off
642
00:33:02.795 --> 00:33:07.605
than the investors, and by far that's true for the investors
643
00:33:08.105 --> 00:33:09.405
and that's true for the founders.
644
00:33:09.745 --> 00:33:12.925
But for us, all of us, it raises a question
645
00:33:13.625 --> 00:33:15.765
and it's a question about governance.
646
00:33:16.665 --> 00:33:19.645
How should you structure the governance
647
00:33:19.825 --> 00:33:24.245
of these companies putting 99.5%
648
00:33:24.265 --> 00:33:27.885
of the voting rights into two people
649
00:33:28.545 --> 00:33:30.205
who are deciding everything?
650
00:33:30.875 --> 00:33:32.885
This raises a question of governance.
651
00:33:33.555 --> 00:33:35.605
Okay, thank you very much.
Hello and welcome to this film which is devoted to Snapchat, a star of the social network world.
The story starts in a very nice way.
The capital is doing extremely well and even bigger.
23 years old at that time is going to reject Nora coming from Mark Zuckerberg.
Zuckerberg wants to buy the company for $3 billion.
We are in October, 2030.
The offer is rejected.
It would have generated a wealth, an increase in their wealth for even Speaker and Bobby Murphy, $750 million for each of them because at that time they owned something like 25% each of the company and they rejected the offer.
Why? Because they thought that they were going to do much better by themselves as Snap was doing very well.
Facebook wanted to defeat them with a new service PO publication of ephemeral photo pictures.
It was a fear of Facebook and it was interestingly a kind of ad for Snapchat showing the interest in this very new business.
The target is the teenagers.
The teenagers don't like Facebook anymore and they are very much attracted by this new social network, so it's going to be rejected, which is extremely glorious.
It seems that Google and Tencent also made offers probably around $4 billion, both rejected by Speer and the co-founder of Bobby Murphy.
Facebook was not unsuccessful with all its acquisitions.
The year before in 2012, the company had quite Instagram for teenagers and for $1 billion a year later it's going to be WhatsApp for $16 billion.
So the company wants to make acquisitions with a strategic intent behind that.
We want to keep the monopoly, we want to keep the control of the market and what is the financial rationality behind this strategic intent, recurring financial result? If we control the business, it's going to be about recurring cash flow, much less sensitive to fluctuations in the macro economy.
What does it mean less fluctuations? It means less risk, less lower beta, less systematic risk than a reduction in the cost of capital which discount the cash flows.
You should reduce a discount rate, you increase the value.
So there's a lot of value behind this strategy.
Let's go back to STA at the very beginning.
2011 pbu the first service which is offered by staff.
In fact, PBU is written in a different way as usual, and as you know, Phu means games with a baby.
Hello, hide and seek or whatsoever, forget it.
There are three founders, Reggie Brown, Bobby Murphy, even speaker, even speaker was is still the chief executive officer.
Reggie Brown is the inventor of the mascot Go face chiller.
He is going to be ousted by the other two and then there will be a legal battle, which is going to start and it's going to end in 2014.
Now he has a right to be named a co-founder of Snapchat and he received $157.5 million out of this uh, legal battle.
And the last news about Regi Brown are quite disaster.
That's it.
What are the products which are so attractive for teenagers? The abilities to send instant photos.
There's a kind of cultural and historical reference to the J of the photography Eastman Kodak, but what makes a difference between Facebook and Snaps is the ability to make them quickly disappear.
For some people, they show some pictures on Facebook, they are not so happy about these pictures and they want to get rid of them.
That's not so easy.
That's strictly organized in Snapchat, rapid disappearance, so it's much more a favorable than Facebook.
Obviously.
At the very beginning the picture was surviving one second, then 10 seconds and 24 hours.
Today you have the ability to make them sustainable on the system with incident loop, but the segment which is very much targeted by Snap is teenagers and young adults, 13 to 35 years old.
Then the new service starts in May, 2012 and at that time 25 pictures are posted and sent per second in November, the same year it's going to be 270 pictures per second.
So it's a fantastic success.
The users, they really like the service.
Of course there will be plenty of evolutions from this period today.
Today and now the company is a social network with multimedia messaging, app, audio and video calls.
You can send photos, you can send short videos.
There are plenty of features, augmented realities, very important filters.
Uh, the ability to create stories and the ability to delete even though it's a little bit limited by the fact that the user may register, may record what you sent.
Now, what is a business model for Snapchat? You understand that you really have an access to a young and creative segment.
The so-called Generation Z, the service itself is absolutely free.
You can have additional features investing, paying for Snapchat plus, and then you pay $4 per month.
If you multiply that by 12 months and if you multiply that by the number of users it represents today something like $240 million per year, it's only 5% of the total revenues of the company.
Advertising represents 95% of revenue.
So it's about ad placement, it's about service snap ads, it's about augmented reality access to this generation.
Obviously it's our competitors.
The main competitors are Instagram and TikTok as the services of good quality and very attractive for these young people.
The number of users is going to grow at least during the first years.
Three regions, north America, Europe, rest of the world, north America growth and then maturity.
It's a bit like Facebook, Europe, same story growth and maturity because a number of users is limited by the population.
Now what about the rest of the world? There is no limitation.
It's lower at the very beginning because it started later and then skyrocketing.
Then you understand that the number of user is growing because of rest of the world.
It's at maturity for the rest of the story, which is North America and Europe.
Now what about the total revenues by geographical area? You observe here something which is absolutely the same as Facebook.
It's a seasonal business.
Why? Because based on advertising, so Q4 is structured stronger than Q1, Q2 and Q3.
You have this seasonality, but what you observe is definitely same as Facebook.
North America is the leading source of revenues, skyrocketing and stabilizing, maybe declining except maybe some kind of bouncing back at the end of Q4 2023.
But it's not that glorious in North America.
What about rest of the world and what about Europe? Exactly.
Centric parallel evolution seems to stabilize a little bit, but no worries about that, but much lower than North America.
Now if you divide the second right by the first one, you get revenue per user as a very well known rpu average revenue per user.
And then what do you observe? You observe the seasonality for each and every region.
Of course it's strong work for North America because it's easier to observe that on the graph, but basically the RPU is now stable in North America, maybe declining except maybe Q4, 20, 23.
A bit up back to growth, but limited growth.
What do you observe for Europe and rest of the world growth and then maturity for Europe.
But what is really a concern is that as far as rest of the world is concerned, it's absolutely not the same case as Facebook.
Facebook is growing in terms of our pure rest of the world.
It is absolutely not the case for snap.
So the growth in rest of the world is not RP, it is number of users.
So you understand that there is really a problem in terms of generating more revenues out of each and every daily active user.
Now as you forget about the quarter and you observe your on year, you see the gross in the revenues, which is absolutely fantastic up to 2021.
Then 2022 shows some beginning of the plateau in 2023, no gross at all.
So if you look at the growth rate year on year, it was absolutely stratospheric at the very beginning.
Then it stabilized around the listing of the company 2022, 10%, 20, 23 0% growth it out of the picture.
If you make a quick recap about the revenue model, number of users, revenue per users maturity in terms of number of users in North America and Europe.
The only growth comes from the rest of the world.
But if you look at the revenue per users, rest of the world seems to be at maturity, the IQ stable for Europe and for rest of the world for North America.
We gross maybe if we are optimistic when we look at the graph because there was a trend which was downward and it seems that there is a little bit of kind of recovery, but if you compare Q4 23 as opposed to 22, the increase is just by 2.2%, which is very weak.
Now if you are growing your revenues, you have to invest growth consumes financial resources, you have to invest in infrastructure, your network, you have to invest in research and the roadmap and sales and marketing and so on and so forth.
And if you consume financial resources, you need investors.
So there will be investors up to the IPO, which is venture capital.
Then will be IPO and post IPO first you have the founders' contribution, the early stage series, A, B, C, and so on.
Okay? Now the serious story is going to start with series D where in December, 2014 and Ider packings is going to invest almost half a billion dollar by itself for a premo evaluation of 10 billion.
$10 billion is the premo evaluation, which means the value of the company before firms are raised.
The primo evaluation is going to be almost $15 billion just a few months later.
Series E, March, 2015, Alibaba very well known it's going to provide $200 million.
The premium evaluation is going to be 14.8, so you have 10 plus 0.5 is 10.5.
Now it is 14.8.
So it's an increase of $4 billion of the value of the company just in a few months, a year before the listing in May, 2016 series F.
Now 1.8 billion, not one investor but 18 investors led by Glad Brook and the primo evaluation of that I is 17.5 billion.
So you understand that it's quite a success.
The companies in the momentum, it's a successful momentum but the value is growing from one fundraising to the other and then there is a listing in 2017 at the price, which is $17 per share.
The stock price go to immediately go up from 17 to $25.
The market value a day, the capital was listed in $33 billion.
So significantly more than the 17.5.
The capital is going to take the opportunity to raise funds, $3.4 billion and Tencent to wanted to get into the capital a few years before is going to use the open market to buy 146 million shares, $2 billion invested.
It's not money for the company but it is buy shares from the open market so that Tencent has a role, plays a role in the company.
The rest is going to be a bit less glorious, 17 to 25 and then down and then collapse.
There will be a kind of recovery of the stock price for some reasons, which are epidemic reasons I would say.
But then the stock price is going to go skyrocketing collapse again and today it's definitely $12 and it does move very much if you compare SNAP with nasdaq, what you observe is that NASDAQ went up again and again.
In the meantime, snap was down the lowest was about $5 per share.
Then thanks too.
Quotes covid.
There will be an increase stock price because at that time all the stock prices of these companies which are providing services which you can use without leaving your home, the stock prices are going to go un reach the sky, zoom, Facebook or whatsoever.
We all know that.
Then the stock price of SNAP is going to reach $80 per year.
It's going to collapse again, it's 12 up 12.
The company is quite opportunistic in terms of stock prices and and and fundraising.
The prices are rising because of COVID-19.
Let's take the opportunity because the stock price is up to sell shares.
Uh, if we sell shares they will be delution and we don't want to lose the control of the company.
So what do we do? We sell convertible bonds.
A convertible bond is a bond which is going to be tomorrow if everything goes right, converted into shares.
So basically you get the money now and the investors, they have the option to convert as they hold an options, they have to pay for it.
How do they pay for it? They receive a coupon on interest, which is less than the coupon of a straight bottle.
Basically the day you do that, you are strengthening your cash situation.
You're reducing your cost of that because the coupon is lower and you're delaying and reducing dilution because dilution is cost postponed.
Convertible bond is absolutely perfect.
There will be three main issues in 2020.
The company is raising $1 billion coupon point 25%.
Of course the interest rates are quite low at that time, but it is significantly less than what the company should pay for a straight debt.
The exercise price, the exercise price is the price as the stock price should reach.
So conversion is more attractive than getting cash back at the end at the maturity of the bond.
This is a bit technical stuff, but basically it means that the convertible bond will be converted if the stock price exceeds $21.70 for the first book.
At that time the stock price is $18.
So 21.7 is just 21% more than 80 20, 21, the stock price is 62.
The company is raising one point 15 billion, zero coupon, no interest at all, and the exercise price is 89.
So the stock price should be more than 89 so that the conversion is exercised and 89 is 44% more than 62.
It's quite aggressive issue.
Same aggressive issue in 20 22, 1 $0.5 billion At that time the stock price is down but it's still $40 per share.
The point is 0.125%, very close to zero.
The exercise price is 56.
56 is 40% more than $40.
But you understand that today the stock price is $12 per share.
There is no conversion so far and there will be probably no conversion at all.
Now why is the stock price so gloomy those days? Because the financial metrics are absolutely not positive.
You remember that value comes from financial performance and financial performance is return capital.
Your return capital should be greater than the cost of capital.
Return.
Capital is how much you earn divided by how much you invested, how much you earn is very much EBITDA and how much you invested is very much capital expenditures, working capital requirement and so on.
So let's have a look at ebitda.
EBITDA is cash, operating revenues minus cash.
Operating expenses, something which looks like cash.
It's nearly cash, it's quite important.
You can calculate the EBITDA directly or you can calculate indirectly who the operating comes with the ebit and then you calculate EBITDA as EBIT plus depreciation, plus amortization, plus stock based compensation.
Then the weight works.
So at the end of the day you calculate the ebit, you calculate the EBITDA and you calculate the roof.
You remember that the campaign is growing in terms of sales.
When you grow in sales, you generate economies of scale.
Economies of scale means that fixed cost per you need are down.
As a consequence, if your costs are down as a percentage to revenue, your EBIT as a percentage to revenue is up, which is absolutely mechanical.
So we see the growth which is there in terms of revenues and the EBIT as a percentage to revenue, which is going up and it's going to be significantly positive in 2021.
In 2022, abro is slowing down and as you have to invest in fighting against competition, which is Instagram and TikTok, EBIT dies down to zero and in 2023 revenues are stable, EBIT dies zero as a percentage to revenue.
That was for ebitda.
Now let's have a look at ebit.
EBIT is revenues minus operating expenses.
You can observe the same economies of scale.
There is a fair virtual period up to 2021.
All the costs are up in absolute terms, but relative to revenues, it's down cost of sales, search and development, sales and marketing general and then me as a percentage to revenues.
They are all down and then there's a point from when it starts getting up again.
So in any bit you understand that there is a nice period where you can observe the potential positive return on sales and then it's out of the picture because costs are up as a percentage to revenue.
When you observe and capital difference between EBIT and ebitda, there is an item which is obvious, which is depreciation, amortization, a non-cash item.
There's another non-cash item which is quite interesting to observe, which is a stock-based compensation.
So you pay a salary to people managers and for key people you are transforming them from employees to employees and core investors in the company.
So you give them equities, shares, restricted stock units which are vested because of service as time goes on or when there is an event which is happening and you give them also stock options, employ stock options plan and that's about options on the stock or absolute shares which are to be in your pocket year after year.
Interestingly, there's a huge debate about how you should account for these SC.
Uh, the accounting authorities say it should be accounted as operating expenses and should be written off in the p and l.
Um, I am personally absolutely against that opinion and I published a blog and the academy on this topic.
Uh, when people are investing in a company, when venture Cap is investing in the company, you don't treat its investment as an expense.
And so if managers and key employees are investing in the company, it's an investment.
It's not a cost should not be opinion.
I stop there.
Now, SPC is something which is quite important in some companies.
If you remember as example of Snowflake, it represents 50% of the operating charges.
As far as SNAP is concerned, the figure is $1.3 billion in 2023.
It's not 50, but it's small than 20% of the operating expenses quite significant.
Now, if you divide this together 1.3 billion by the number of employed at snap at that time you get upset, which is about $250,000 per employee.
Of course there are huge differences from one employee to the other, but it's quite interesting to compare that and contract it with the media salary Million means that there are as many people who receive more, as many people who receive less.
It's $346,000, which is quite high as a media salary by the way.
And you understand that SBC is a very significant part of that 250, 350.
Now, if we consider that SBC should not be treated as an expense, let's calculate the cost excluding stock based compensation quarter by quarter what you observe, you observe this virtual phase with declining costs as a percentage to revenues and stabilize shallow the Yellowstone so far.
But even though you exclude SBC, what do you observe? If you make a sum of cost of sales and r and d and sales and marketing and GA, you get a sum, which is more or less 100% or more than 100%, then it's going to be very difficult to be a positive in terms of p and l in terms of EBIT and ebitda.
If your costs are exceeding your revenues as far as the rose sales concerns and the narrator is EBIT is negative, but the denominator, the denominator is how much we invest in your business operations.
It's about fixed and current capital.
It's about capital expenditures and working capital requirement.
Let's start with the cash conversion cycle.
The operating working capital requirements made of inventory, but cash receivable bonds, accounts payable.
Of course, in a business like snap, there is no inventory, not in manufacturing are retail distribution.
So it's about receivables minus payables and it's quite significant.
The cash conversion cycle is about 80 days of sales and revenues, but the non-operating working capital requirement incorporate a few things like CHA fund revenue advertising agencies are paying up front and so on and so forth.
So as a consequence, the actual working capital requirement is less than the cash conversion cycle.
It's about a most, it's not negligible, but it's not very high when you create the company.
You have to invest a lot in infrastructure, IT network and so on and so forth.
So basically in the early years of the company, the CapEx two revenues ratio is quite high.
Then it's going to go down.
Then it's about maintenance productivity and so on so forth.
A bit up during the last years probably because you have to improve the quality of service or whatsoever.
CapEx is not very low, but it's not very high.
The assets turnover is going to profit from the increase in the revenues.
This is part of the economy's skill by the way, but that is going to plateau and today it's 1.5.
The 1.5 is not explained by onlay capital expenditure and cash conversion cycle.
It's also explained by acquisitions, intangible assets, goodwill, capitalize or the expenses or whatsoever.
So basically the assets turnover is 1.5.
What does it mean? It means that there is some capital intensity in this business.
The capital intensity comes from infrastructure and it comes from acquisitions, but it's quite interesting to observe the consequence of this figure.
You remember that return capital is return on sales times assets turnover.
Imagine that for any reason, return on sales turns positive.
It's not going to be very much amplified by the assets turnover.
If a return on sales turns to 10% return capital would be 15%, which is not that much.
So the company is fighting in order to transform the negative into positive return on sales, but it's not going to profit from asset light business.
It's quite capital intensive and return on sales is going to be amplified by only 50% to create the return on capital report.
That's quite difficult for the future.
Now let's go back to the stock based compensation.
Stock based compensation is provided in the 10 care report for each and every function.
So you have the amount, stock based compensation for r and d, for general admin and so on, so forth.
Who is the winner? The winner is r and d because for r and D stock-based compensations represents 50% of the r and d costs.
So your developers, your engineers, your et cetera, developing the service and developing the features, they receive quite a lot of shares, restricted stock units and um, stock options.
Second with 20% sales and marketing and general and admin.
General admin includes the general management, uh, who receives plenty of uh, this kind of stuff.
Cost of revenues, cost of sales, production, knee or almost so this remuneration, which is about the price of the company.
The value of the company is going to be concentrated in the hands of research and development and sales and marketing general mean general management.
If you observe, when cost of sales received some stock based compensation, it was when the IPO took place before the IPO, everybody received stock based compensation.
And then what you observe is the number one is general and admin.
Why? Because it's a general manager.
The CEO is going to receive tons of SBC.
You're never better served than by yourself.
When you receive this kind stock based compensation, you receive a plan which is going to be vested as a consequence of service time.
So the shares, the restricted stock units are vested quarter by quarter or, and it's vested because there is an event.
The IPO is part of the event.
So even bigger received just before the IPO, plenty of restricted stock units, which were supposed to be immediately vested by the IPO.
It consists in 37.4 million C shares seven, 4.7 B shares 612 million A shares.
This is a total of 724 million shares which were immediately vested by the IPO.
The IPO took place at $17.
So you understand the amount of money which is going to be vested immediately in the pocket of the CEO.
There are three classes of shares.
The A shares are non-voting.
So you receive the dividend.
Of course there's no dividend because there is no profit and that's it.
But you have no voting right in the shareholder meeting B shares, they have one voting right to share C shares stand voting right to share.
Now the question is where is the capital located? Who is the owner of the A versus B versus C shares? The answer is provided in a 10 care report, 2023 of the capital.
What you can almost read on the extract of the 10 care report is that 99.5% of the voting right are concentrated in the hands of even people and Bobby Murphy.
These guys, they own 100% of the C shares 10 voting rights and they own 52% of the B shares, one voting right per share.
So at the end of the day with 52% of the B shares and all of the C shares, it represents 21.6% of the capital, but 99.5% of the voting rights, they completely control the company.
Their friend Mark Zuckerberg is almost in the same situation, is about 13% of the capital.
He sold some shares recently.
Uh, and more than 50% of the voting rights, you are the boss because you hold the majority of the voting rights.
Of course, a number of shares you hold has an impact on your wealth.
If you look at the evolution of the net worth of Mr.
Spiegel as it is published by Forbes, the list of the billionaires, you understand that there was a peak when the stock price reached something like $80 per share.
At that time, his net worth was $11 billion.
Uh, it went down, but it is still $3 billion.
So you can maybe compare $3 billion today versus $750 million 10 years ago invested in nasdaq, doesn't matter.
With $3 billion, you are reasonably well off and that what is absolutely important to remember, of course with a great sense of humor, the capital is publishing on a 10 K report, the evolution stock price, and they start in December 18.
When it was at the low point when the company announced the 2023 result, the stock price collapsed.
It was very bad news.
Even though the RPU was a bit betterer in North America, as of course to Q4 2022, it collapsed because there's no growth and there's no performance.
And so at the end of the day what happened, NASDAQ was going up smoothly.
It went down.
It went up a little bit when the company and now that they were buying bags convertible, of course you can buy bags of convertible because the probability of conversion is now absolutely zero.
The coupon is close to zero one.
In the meantime, the HRA rates went up.
So the value of the convertible bonds is down and then you use your cash to buy back convertible bolts.
Wow, that's a great value creation process.
In the end, if you look at the return investment for all these investors, the market cap today is a bit less than $20 billion.
You remember series D, the premo valuation was 10 billion.
Today it's twice as much, but in the meantime there were other equity issues, so you've been a bit diluted.
And the meantime, the NASDAQ was multiplied by 2.5 and there is no dilution in Nasda series A, uh, plus 35% in nine euros.
So it's a positive return, but it's value destruction, obviously series F plus 11% in eight euros.
Again, positive return and value structure does not pay the cost of capital by far IPO from 17 to 12 minus 30% as a retail university and the convertible bolts, they are all non-convertible anymore, and so the return is negative.
This is why the company can buy them back at the price which is lower than the price at which they were issued.
So for the investors, it's a disaster, but for the founders, it's a success story because they receive plenty of stocks and so on and so and so.
At the end of the day, the founders are much more well off than the investors, and by far that's true for the investors and that's true for the founders.
But for us, all of us, it raises a question and it's a question about governance.
How should you structure the governance of these companies putting 99.5% of the voting rights into two people who are deciding everything? This raises a question of governance.
Okay, thank you very much.